@@ -15 +15 @@
-<gloss>ignoring (somebody)</gloss>
+<gloss>ignoring (someone)</gloss>

Meikyo

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

OK. Leave as it is.

* both mention it but end with "という"

https://news.yahoo.co.jp/pickup/6409095
維新と国民、改憲に向け連携　9日にも幹事長、国対委員長会談

@@ -27,0 +28,7 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2834694">日本維新の会</xref>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<gloss>Nippon Ishin no Kai</gloss>
+<gloss>Japan Innovation Party</gloss>
+</sense>

@@ -23,0 +24 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1532470">明治維新</xref>

@@ -23,0 +24 @@
+<misc>&hist;</misc>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Indian</gloss>
+<gloss>Indian (person)</gloss>

インド人	511387
印度人	8579

self-approve

We don't usually include ateji in -人 entries

@@ -6,4 +5,0 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>印度人</keb>
-<ke_inf>&ateji;</ke_inf>

Hindu is ヒンズー/ヒンドゥー.

@@ -17,1 +17,0 @@
-<gloss>Hindu</gloss>

@@ -4,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>インド人</keb>
+</k_ele>

@@ -22 +22 @@
-<gloss>dispersion (e.g. of a crowd)</gloss>
+<gloss>dispersal (e.g. of a crowd)</gloss>

gg5, prog

@@ -21,2 +21,2 @@
-<gloss>breaking up (e.g. meeting)</gloss>
-<gloss>dispersing (e.g. crowd)</gloss>
+<gloss>breaking up (a meeting, gathering, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>dispersion (e.g. of a crowd)</gloss>
@@ -29,3 +29,4 @@
-<gloss>dissolving (company, organization, etc.)</gloss>
-<gloss>liquidating</gloss>
-<gloss>disbanding</gloss>
+<gloss>dissolution (of a company, organization, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>winding-up</gloss>
+<gloss>disbandment</gloss>
+<gloss>split-up</gloss>
@@ -38 +39 @@
-<gloss>dissolving (diet, parliament, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>dissolution (of the Diet, Parliament, etc.)</gloss>

mk (same 3 senses)

@@ -18,0 +19,2 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -24,0 +27,2 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -31,0 +36,2 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

I've aligned the sentences.

@@ -19,2 +19,2 @@
-<gloss>breaking up (meeting)</gloss>
-<gloss>dispersing (crowd)</gloss>
+<gloss>breaking up (e.g. meeting)</gloss>
+<gloss>dispersing (e.g. crowd)</gloss>

nikk

@@ -15,0 +16,4 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>快豁</keb>

快闊	170
快豁	46

快活	132213
快闊	170
快濶	685

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -14,0 +16 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

@@ -12,0 +12,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>快濶</keb>

@@ -21 +21 @@
-<gloss>dolphin (or other small toothed whales, such as porpoises, belugas, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>dolphin (or other small toothed whales, incl. porpoises, belugas, etc.)</gloss>

海豚	40187
いるか	12684628
イルカ	1810193

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -9,0 +11 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>
@@ -13,0 +16 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

海馬	201997
胡獱	No matches
魹	313
とど	206526
トド	193044

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -11,0 +13 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

gg5, wiki, daijr

I don't think the [oK] tags are necessary.

@@ -8,2 +8 @@
-<keb>魹</keb>
-<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>
+<keb>胡獱</keb>
@@ -12,2 +11 @@
-<keb>胡獱</keb>
-<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>
+<keb>魹</keb>
@@ -25,2 +23,2 @@
-<gloss>Steller's sea lion</gloss>
-<gloss>Northern sea lion</gloss>
+<gloss>Steller sea lion (Eumetopias jubatus)</gloss>
+<gloss>northern sea lion</gloss>

@@ -30 +30 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1201710">海豹</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1201710">アザラシ</xref>

海驢	3405
葦鹿	150
海馬	201997 (also means hippocampus)
アシカ	169993

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -8,0 +10 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -11,0 +14 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -27 +29,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

皆既食	2738
皆既蝕	72

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

concise; gg5; luminous

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>total eclipse (of sun by moon)</gloss>
+<gloss>total eclipse (solar or lunar)</gloss>

koj
(「介」とも書く)

@@ -8,0 +9,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>介</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

gg5, daijr/s

More accurate.

@@ -18 +17,0 @@
-<gloss>shell</gloss>
@@ -20,0 +20,6 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1203130">貝殻</xref>
+<gloss>seashell</gloss>
+<gloss>shell</gloss>
+</sense>

蒲公英	39636
たんぽぽ	887180
ほこうえい	1785
タンポポ	614429
= less than 3% of katakana plus hiragana 
versions

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -9,0 +11 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>
@@ -16,0 +19 @@
+<re_pri>spec2</re_pri>

鴨の嘴	746
鴨嘴	536
かものはし	46391
カモノハシ	46109

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -8,0 +10 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

Wiki

@@ -20,1 +20,1 @@
-<gloss>platypus</gloss>
+<gloss>platypus (Ornithorhynchus anatinus)</gloss>

@@ -13,0 +13,4 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>カモノハシ</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>
+</r_ele>

daij, meikyo, prog

@@ -24,0 +25,7 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<gloss>being infected (e.g. with harmful ideas)</gloss>
+<gloss>being influenced (by)</gloss>
+</sense>

mk (2 senses, second figurative use of first)

@@ -18,0 +19,2 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<field>&med;</field>

gg5, prog
Oxford (infection): "the process of infecting or the state of being infected"

"Infection" is not wrong.

@@ -19,2 +19 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<gloss>contracting an infection</gloss>
+<gloss>infection</gloss>
@@ -21,0 +21 @@
+<gloss>becoming infected</gloss>

daijr

@@ -20 +20 @@
-<gloss>infection</gloss>
+<gloss>contracting an infection</gloss>

I think it's OK to keep.

https://s.japanese.joins.com/JArticle/210811?
sectcode=400&servcode=400
日帝７３１部隊の「マルタ」、韓国出身犠牲者が初めて確
認 (headline in Jp-language edition of Korean 
newspaper)
https://bunshun.jp/articles/-/48218?page=4
中国人捕虜「マルタ」への人体実験をしていた731部隊
https://hodanren.doc-
net.or.jp/inorinri2015/pdf/tuchiya.pdf
(article in the Keio Journal of Economics)
explained once, then used an additional 13 times 
in the document (within 「」 quotes every time, 
from it being sens I imagine (using at without 
quotes would probably be offensive))

https://www.asahi.com/articles/ASN273VPFN27UCVL0
07.html
「ヒロアカ」作者と集英社がお詫び　海外から抗議続く
...集英社は「事前に編集部が表現について十全な検討を
行うべきでした。深くお詫び申し上げます」としている。
また堀越さんは「読者のみなさんを傷つける意図は全くあ
りませんでした。心からお詫びいたします」と記した。
　「志賀丸太」の名前は単行本収録時に変更するという。
re: the incident previously mentioned. It 
apparently ended with the publisher issuing an 
apology and changing the name of the character

I don't think the fact that the word is usually 
introduced with an explanation is a strong 
argument against including it here. When we're 
talking about katakana versions of words in 
English then yes, it can constitute evidence 
that the English word is just being discussed in 
the context of English language, not actually 
used in Japanese, but I don't think that's very 
convincing when we're talking about a word (or 
sense) that is exclusively Japanese. I'd 
similarly expect any obscure to semi-obscure 
historical term to be explained/described in the 
first instance its' used in most texts. 
That said I might agree with you that there 
wouldn't be a need to record this if it were 
_just_ a slightly obscure historical term that 
hadn't received any attention outside of 
scholarly circles, but again, the fact that it's 
recently received attention both in and outside 
of Japan, in national press, that led to an 
actual apology and a name change, means it's 
something dictionaries from now on really should 
be including.

It almost always appears in a form like "「マルタ」と呼ばれた", "「マルタ」と称した", etc., which are mentions (not uses) of the word - an important distinction. I don't think a word that 
hasn't at any point been widely used for its meaning meets the criteria for inclusion.

OK

sense 4: daijs and nikk. nikk's 語源 note is interesting and is quite similar to sense 3: (頭の丸いことから①を連想し、転びやすい
ことを掛けて) (which is similar to NHK's explanation for sense 3, that the prisoners were bald)


sense 3:
nipp: 七三一部隊
七三一部隊に送り込まれた捕虜は中国人、ロシア人をはじめモンゴル人、朝鮮人、少数のアングロ・サクソン系白人で、女性、子供も含まれていた。彼ら
はマルタ（丸太）とよばれ、1000種類以上の生体実験、あらゆる生体解剖に使用された。「マルタ」は2日に3体の割で「消費」され、1939～1945年だけ
で3000人以上が犠牲になったという。
https://gendai.ismedia.jp/articles/-/70626
731部隊は満洲北部の平房（現在の黒龍江省哈爾濱〈ハルビン〉市平房区）という寒村に、一大細菌・生物戦施設を設け、捕虜とした中国人やロシア人約
3000人を「マルタ」と称し、文字通り「丸太」のごとく非人道的な扱いをしながら、ペスト菌やコレラ菌など細菌の感染実験、生体解剖を重ねていた。
https://www.nhk.or.jp/special/plus/articles/20170915/index.html
囚人は頭を丸坊主に刈られ、「マルタ」と呼ばれていたという。
「杭を打ってね、ずーっと杭を打って、そこにマルタをつないどくんです。実験の計画に沿って憲兵が連れて行って、“何番の杭に誰を縛る”とかっ
て、“つなぐ”とかっていう、やるわけね」（三角さん）
https://www.lit.osaka-cu.ac.jp/user/tsuchiya/class/vuniv99/exp-lec4.html
中心になる建物は「ロ」の字型をしており、その内側に「マルタ」と呼ばれた被験者を閉じこめておく特設の監獄が二つ設けられていました。
https://www.courts.go.jp/app/files/hanrei_jp/795/005795_hanrei.pdf
ロ号棟の中庭には，最大４００名を収容できる特殊
監獄が建設され，ここに，日本の支配に抵抗し，あるいは抵抗したとみなされて捕
えられた中国人，ロシア人，朝鮮人，モンゴル人などが収容された。これらの人々
は「マルタ」（丸太）と呼ばれ，１本，２本と数えられた。
http://war-medicine-ethics.com/Seniken/Journal_contents.htm
「731部隊」―遁走時のマルタ及び施設の抹殺―「療養中」の731部隊兵士、40人も同時に殺害か―
https://mainichi.jp/articles/20181215/ddl/k26/070/466000c
ハバロフスク裁判では同氏を中心とする“凍傷実験”（マルタを無理に凍傷にさせる実験）が暴露されました。 
https://mainichi.jp/articles/20201217/ddl/k36/040/405000c
現地で捕らえられた人々を「マルタ」と呼んで人為的に細菌に感染させ、生きたまま解剖する ...

It's one meaning of the word that has recently received media attention in China and Korea (and as a result of this coverage, 
also in Japan). I think it'd be remiss to not mention it here. It's obscure in the sense that the average Japanese person won't 
be aware of this meaning, yes, but it's obviously not at all obscure in a historical sense.

@@ -13,0 +14,4 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>マルタ</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>
+</r_ele>
@@ -19,0 +24 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -23,0 +29,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2849424">七三一部隊</xref>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -26,0 +34,6 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&derog;</misc>
+<misc>&arch;</misc>
+<gloss>prostitute dressed as a Buddhist nun</gloss>

gg5, prog
ルミナス: 騒乱の起因は判決に対する村民の不満だった 
起因	1193602
起因を	1599
起因が	1569
起因は	1897

I could only find one example in my refs where it's used as a noun.
Shinmeikai has separate n and vs senses. Probably the best approach.

@@ -18,0 +19,9 @@
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<gloss>to be caused by</gloss>
+<gloss>to result from</gloss>
+<gloss>to arise from</gloss>
+<gloss>to stem from</gloss>
+<gloss>to be due to</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
@@ -20 +28,0 @@
-<pos>&vs;</pos>

起因する	847750
基因する	3406

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

Daijr (merges).

Merging 1617980.

@@ -7,0 +8,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>基因</keb>
@@ -17,0 +21 @@
+<gloss>origin</gloss>

more common in ngrams and in all kokugos 
unlike 蟻食い

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>蟻食い</keb>
+<keb>蟻食</keb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<keb>蟻食</keb>
+<keb>蟻食い</keb>

I don't think so.

@@ -32 +31,0 @@
-<s_inf>食蟻獣 is gikun</s_inf>

アリクイ	25327
食蟻獣	27

do we rally need to spell out that the super 
obscure 
食蟻獣 is gikun in a note? it's clutter

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -14,0 +16 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -17,0 +20 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

G n-grams:
蟻食い	1126
蟻食	5031
蟻喰い	 230
蟻喰	 164
食蟻獣	  27

@@ -8,0 +9,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>蟻喰い</keb>

襟巻蜥蜴	42
襟巻き蜥蜴	No matches
エリマキトカゲ	14799

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -8,0 +10 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

heard used on tv
("my birthday is January 5" by Kyushu man in 
his 60s)

@@ -15,0 +16,4 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ごにち</reb>
+<re_inf>&ik;</re_inf>

per discussion on 四日

@@ -23 +23 @@
-<gloss>5 days</gloss>
+<gloss>five days</gloss>

olicy
if the numbers are in the context of a formula, quantity, measurement, etc. use figures (e.g. 1.5 kilograms);
if the numbers are in something more descriptive or narrative, in general use words for numbers up to ten (e.g. three kings, 
five flowers), and figures for numbers over ten (e.g. 147 angels). In some cases, such as the 三十三所 entry, "thirty-three 
temples" looks more natural than "33 temples".

I'll use roman numerals for the glosses for days 1-10 for consistency

include ごにち[ik]? (wiki: 5日（いつか、ごにち）

@@ -4,0 +5,4 @@
+<keb>５日</keb>
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -7,4 +10,0 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>５日</keb>
-<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -19 +19 @@
-<gloss>fifth day of the month</gloss>
+<gloss>5th day of the month</gloss>
@@ -23 +23 @@
-<gloss>five days</gloss>
+<gloss>5 days</gloss>

@@ -29,0 +30 @@
+<stagk>甲斐</stagk>
@@ -30,0 +32 @@
+<misc>&hist;</misc>

甲斐がある	91973
詮がある	22
効がある	3804

@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -12,0 +14 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

@@ -26,0 +27,4 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>Kai (former province located in present-day Yamanashi Prefecture)</gloss>
+</sense>

koj: キリスト教で、自分の信仰を公に表明すること。
daijs: キリスト教で，自己の信仰を公に言い表すこと。

I really think we're overcomplicating this. The "cultural context" here is universal and I think it can be conveyed with a much simpler gloss.
Added sense.

@@ -20 +20 @@
-<gloss>confession (of guilt, crime, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>confession (to a crime, wrongdoing, etc.)</gloss>
@@ -22,2 +21,0 @@
-<gloss>profession</gloss>
-<gloss>declaration</gloss>
@@ -29,2 +27,9 @@
-<gloss>professing one's feelings to someone and asking them to become one's romantic partner (oft. considered a prerequisite to beginning a relationship in earnest)</gloss>
-<gloss>declaring one's love to someone (and asking them out)</gloss>
+<gloss>professing one's feelings (to someone one wants to go out with)</gloss>
+<gloss>declaration of love</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<field>&Christn;</field>
+<gloss>profession (of faith)</gloss>

I confess to being a bit tired of this one.
I've adjusted the sntences.

Additionally, in 告白① it doesn't matter who 
you're confessing to, but 告白② has to be 
directed towards the specific person one has 
feelings for. It's really quite something 
specific that I think needs to be separate 
from the general "confession" sense.

https://www.tofugu.com/japan/kokuhaku-love-confessing-japan/
KOKUHAKU: JAPAN'S LOVE CONFESSING CULTURE
... kokuhaku 告白こくはく, literally means "confession", and it is done when a man or a woman declares their love to 
another, and hopes to begin dating that person.
... You may go out with the person a few times or go out on a group date, but your relationship hasn't technically 
started until this love confession, aka kokuhaku, occurs.
https://skdesu.com/en/confess-kokuhaku-tsukiatte-kudasai-request-dating/
The art of declaring or confessing love in Japan is known as Kokuhaku [告白] already in the case of inviting a person to 
go out or date after declaring yourself, if you use Tsukiatte kudasai [付き合ってください].
Kokuhaku [告白] literally means “confession”, and it is done when a man or a woman declare your love to another, and 
hopes to start dating that person soon after. The word can also mean recognition and even confessional.

https://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/40019825078
恋愛における〈告白〉の形成に見る現代日本社会 (unfortunately not available)

https://ir.lib.hiroshima-u.ac.jp/ja/00019550
"恋愛における告白の成功・失敗の規定因"
English title: "Factors influencing success and failure of confessing one's love"
↑
This is a good example why "confessing one's love" doesn't actually work well as a translation. It's not necessarily 
immediately obvious what "success/failure" refers to here with that gloss. How can you fail at confessing your love? If 
somebody told me "I failed at confessing my love" I'd first assume they were saying they just didn't go through with 
it. 告白を失敗

I really think there's a really large cultural context to Japanese 告白 which is something that demands a proper 
explanation and lumping it in with any random confession is doing a disservice to our users who largely are beginner-
level learners. Also this sense is decidedly [vi], which alone is a very good reason to have it separately from the vt 
"confession". 

(kind of irrelevant but there's a very good translation for this sense in Swedish: "fråga chans", except it's only used 
by elementary school kids. https://en.bab.la/dictionary/swedish-english/fråga-chans )

@@ -20 +20 @@
-<gloss>confession (of guilt, love, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>confession (of guilt, crime, etc.)</gloss>
@@ -23,0 +24,7 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<gloss>professing one's feelings to someone and asking them to become one's romantic partner (oft. considered a prerequisite to beginning a relationship in earnest)</gloss>
+<gloss>declaring one's love to someone (and asking them out)</gloss>

daijr/s, gg5, wisdom

@@ -7,0 +8,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>差止め</keb>
@@ -21,0 +25 @@
+<gloss>injunction</gloss>

差し止め	246277
差止	124935

@@ -7,0 +8,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>差止</keb>

I think we'd use "dated" to describe most 死語.

@@ -25,0 +26 @@
+<gloss>dated word</gloss>

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<xref type="ant" seq="2837851">活語・1</xref>

daij

@@ -22,0 +23 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1625580">廃語</xref>

gg5, prog

@@ -28,0 +29,2 @@
+<gloss>castor</gloss>
+<gloss>caster</gloss>

https://news.yahoo.co.jp/articles/28569fe94ef445c49b32e2370f2b34f6054a8355
(13 counts of クルマ in this article)


くるま	1126283
クルマ	9333782
車	86552036

@@ -15,0 +16,4 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>クルマ</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>
+</r_ele>

sankoku (+ found on the wild used as suru verb)

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 終焉　 │ 687,891 │ 98.2% │
│ 終えん │  12,536 │  1.8% │
╰─ーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -18,0 +20,2 @@
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -24,0 +28,2 @@
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

gg5, prog, daij, meikyo

@@ -18,0 +19,2 @@
+<gloss>end (of life)</gloss>
+<gloss>death</gloss>
@@ -20,0 +23,4 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>(peacefully) spending one's final years</gloss>
+</sense>

meikyo: 「スポーツで、…」

@@ -29,0 +30 @@
+<field>&sports;</field>

Fixed the sentences.

gg5, prog, daijr, meikyo, nikk

Nikk and meikyo have a separate sense for "advancing to the next round". I think this is clearer.

@@ -20,5 +20,11 @@
-<gloss>advance (into a new market or stage of progress)</gloss>
-<gloss>launching (a new career or venture)</gloss>
-<gloss>expanding (into a new market)</gloss>
-<gloss>stepping forward</gloss>
-<gloss>emerging</gloss>
+<gloss>advance (into a new market, industry, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>expansion (into)</gloss>
+<gloss>launch (into)</gloss>
+<gloss>entering</gloss>
+<gloss>making inroads (into)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<gloss>advance (to the next round of a competition)</gloss>

mk (2 senses)

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

地球温暖化	1673652
地球温暖化し	744

@@ -14 +13,0 @@
-<pos>&vs;</pos>

G n-grams 1673652

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -8,0 +10 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

@@ -28 +28 @@
-<gloss>to change one's clothes</gloss>
+<gloss>to change (one's clothes)</gloss>

gg5

@@ -25,0 +26,2 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

着替える	248260
着換える	538

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

Yes, I think 当せん makes the merge a bit messy. Reverting.

@@ -10,8 +9,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>当籤</keb>
-<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>当せん</keb>
-<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
-</k_ele>
@@ -25 +16,0 @@
-<stagk>当選</stagk>
@@ -37,2 +28,2 @@
-<s_inf>usu. as 当せん</s_inf>
-<gloss>winning (in a lottery, raffle, etc.)</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1619880">当籤</xref>
+<gloss>winning a prize (in a lottery, raffle, etc.)</gloss>

maybe it's fine like this? still probably best to not merge
sorry for all the comments

@@ -36,0 +37 @@
+<s_inf>usu. as 当せん</s_inf>

actually nvm, 当せん is really only used for sense 2 and it wouldn't be clear with a merge unless we keep it visible
best to not merge and reject this edit i guess

sankoku, smk, meikyo

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーー─┬───────────┬───────╮
│ 当選　 │ 6,812,284 │ 98.6% │
│ 当籤　 │    10,541 │  0.2% │
│ 当せん │    85,100 │  1.2% │
╰─ーーー─┴───────────┴───────╯

i think it makes sense to merge entry 当籤 with this

@@ -9,0 +10,8 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>当籤</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>当せん</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
@@ -16,0 +25 @@
+<stagk>当選</stagk>
@@ -27,0 +37 @@
+<gloss>winning (in a lottery, raffle, etc.)</gloss>
@@ -29 +38,0 @@
-<gloss>winning</gloss>

@@ -26 +26 @@
-<gloss>ton (esp. a metric ton, i.e. 1000kg)</gloss>
+<gloss>ton (esp. a metric ton, i.e. 1000 kg)</gloss>

I don't think we need the lsrc tag.

@@ -26,2 +26 @@
-<lsource xml:lang="eng"/>
-<gloss>ton (now usu. a metric ton, i.e. 1,000kg)</gloss>
+<gloss>ton (esp. a metric ton, i.e. 1000kg)</gloss>

@@ -7 +7 @@
-<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -15,0 +17 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

Don't need that xref.

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1280560">硬骨・1</xref>
+<field>&anat;</field>

Should sense 1 be anat?

@@ -22,0 +23 @@
+<field>&food;</field>
@@ -24 +25 @@
-<gloss>(dish of) gristle (usu. of chicken, deep-fried)</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">(dish of) gristle (usu. of chicken, deep-fried)</gloss>

google images
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/軟骨#食材としての軟骨

No other dictionary splits, but I think something like this might be helpful.

@@ -18 +17,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -21,0 +21,5 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>nankotsu</gloss>
+<gloss>(dish of) gristle (usu. of chicken, deep-fried)</gloss>
+</sense>

gg5, ルミナス, wisdom
制裁を排除	23
制裁を解除	4934

I don't think it is.
I don't think "lifting (sanctions, etc.)" is right.

@@ -20 +19,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -23 +21,0 @@
-<gloss>rejection</gloss>
@@ -25,2 +23,2 @@
-<gloss>abatement</gloss>
-<gloss>lifting (sanctions, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>clearing away</gloss>
+<gloss>getting rid of</gloss>

meikyo

not sure if really adj-no

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 付箋　 │ 236,570 │ 96.2% │
│ 付せん │   7,189 │  2.9% │ - sK
│ 附箋　 │   2,217 │  0.9% │
│ ふせん │  65,396 │  N/A  │
╰─ーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

@@ -8 +8,2 @@
-<keb>付せん</keb>
+<keb>附箋</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -11,2 +12,2 @@
-<keb>附箋</keb>
-<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+<keb>付せん</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

I think "sticker" is too broad.

@@ -19 +18,0 @@
-<gloss>sticker</gloss>
@@ -24 +23 @@
-<gloss g_type="tm">Post-it Note</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="tm">Post-it note</gloss>

付箋 google image results


付箋	236570
付せん	7189
附箋	2217

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -17,0 +19,2 @@
+<gloss>sticker</gloss>
+<gloss>sticky note</gloss>
@@ -21 +24 @@
-<gloss>sticker</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="tm">Post-it Note</gloss>

付箋	236570
附箋	2217
付せん	7189
GG5

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<keb>附箋</keb>
+<keb>付せん</keb>
@@ -11 +11 @@
-<keb>付せん</keb>
+<keb>附箋</keb>
@@ -20,0 +21 @@
+<gloss>sticker</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 片鱗を　　 │ 66,698 │ 97.4% │
│ 片りんを　 │  1,622 │  2.4% │
│ へんりんを │    150 │  0.2% │
╰─ーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 片鱗　 │ 142,140 │ 97.5% │
│ 片りん │   3,630 │  2.5% │
╰─ーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

ルミナス, wisdom

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<gloss>part</gloss>
@@ -16,2 +16,0 @@
-<gloss>part</gloss>
-<gloss>snapshot</gloss>
@@ -18,0 +18 @@
+<gloss>bit</gloss>

片鱗	142140
片りん	3630
へんりん	1018

found in cc for a tv show

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>片りん</keb>

Ok

prog, chujiten, daij

This is my best guess.
Added sense.

@@ -25 +24,0 @@
-<pos>&vt;</pos>
@@ -27,0 +27,6 @@
+<gloss>working hard</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>experience</gloss>
+<gloss>lesson (for the future)</gloss>
@@ -35 +40 @@
-<gloss>reduction</gloss>
+<gloss>price reduction</gloss>

Sense 1 seems obviously vt, not sure aboutthe 
other two.

@@ -20 +19,0 @@
-<pos>&vi;</pos>

Any idea why Meikyo tags this as intransitive? It doesn't have to take a direct object, of course, but neither do 歌う, 食べる, 書く, etc., and they're only transitive in Meikyo.

meikyo

@@ -18,0 +19,2 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -23,0 +26,2 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -28,0 +33,2 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<misc>&hist;</misc>
@@ -19,0 +21 @@
+<misc>&hist;</misc>

-> pinyin

@@ -20 +20 @@
-<gloss>Chinese soldiers stationed to protect remote regions of the country during the T'ang dynasty</gloss>
+<gloss>Chinese soldiers stationed to protect remote regions of the country during the Tang dynasty</gloss>

角鴟	144
ミミズク	70919
木菟	4491
木兎	1858
鴟鵂	No matches
みみずく	69695

木菟 is kinda borderline, maybe

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -11,0 +13 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -14,0 +17 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

成る程.

It's in daijr:”〔現代仮名遣いでは「みみづく」の
ように「づ」を用いて書くこともできる〕”

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/ミミズク

I'm not seeing みみづく anywhere (including meikyo). Can we drop it?

@@ -37,0 +38,4 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ミミズク</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>
+</r_ele>

daijr

@@ -12,0 +13,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>鴟鵂</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -16,0 +20 @@
+<re_restr>鴟鵂</re_restr>
@@ -21,0 +26 @@
+<re_restr>鴟鵂</re_restr>

chuujiten

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>night breeze</gloss>

膃肭臍	564
オットセイ	61896

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -8,0 +10 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

@@ -21,1 +21,1 @@
-<gloss>Alaskan fur sea</gloss>
+<gloss>Alaskan fur seal</gloss>

GG5

Gg5 has 膃肭獣, but Daij, Koj and the other JEs have 膃肭臍.

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>膃肭獣</keb>
@@ -18,0 +21,1 @@
+<gloss>Alaskan fur sea</gloss>

鸚哥	3393
インコ	624529

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -8,0 +10 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

koj daij

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>音呼</keb>

Maybe split?

@@ -17,0 +18,6 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&derog;</misc>
+<gloss>underclass</gloss>
+<gloss>riffraff</gloss>

Not a conversation I heard personally but was retold. The conversation 
was about nishinari-ku and the election (they elected sb from Soka 
Gakkai). it was something like this:
"下民(げみん)やからな。貧乏な人は宗教に行っちゃう"
I don't think "masses" "common people" work in this sentence. a 
derogatory "underclass" does. "riffraff" might be a little off, I don't 
know, but it seems to be in the right general area.

saito: The lower classes; the masses; the populace; the rabbleしもじも

I'm not sure げみん is the more common reading. Saito only has かみん. There are only 11 examples with furigana in Aozora so we can't read too much into those percentages. Not a common word nowadays anyway. 
I think "riffraff" is the wrong register.
I think the nuance of "underclass" might be too negative, even for げみん. The kokugos define げみん as "しもじもの者", which GG5 glosses as "the lower classes; ordinary [the common] people; the masses."
As long as we lead with "lower classes", I think these glosses are fine.

@@ -16,2 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>underclass (of society)</gloss>
-<gloss>riffraff</gloss>
+<gloss>the masses</gloss>
+<gloss>the common people</gloss>

https://furigana.info/w/下民
https://www.vocabulary.com/dictionary/common%2
0people

I think "the masses" is too ambiguous. Same 
for "common people". I thibk this is more 
obviously negative in nuance (at least げみん)
I thkink げみん is more common

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>かみん</reb>
+<reb>げみん</reb>
@@ -11 +11 @@
-<reb>げみん</reb>
+<reb>かみん</reb>
@@ -15 +14,0 @@
-<gloss>the masses</gloss>
@@ -17 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>the common people</gloss>
+<gloss>underclass (of society)</gloss>
+<gloss>riffraff</gloss>

信天翁	18711
あほう鳥	10063
阿呆鳥	4128
阿房鳥	54
あほうどり	20570
しんてんおう	53
アホウドリ	41391

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

Unidic/ngrams.

@@ -8,1 +8,1 @@
-<keb>阿房鳥</keb>
+<keb>あほう鳥</keb>
@@ -12,0 +12,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>阿房鳥</keb>

meikyo

@@ -9,0 +9,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>阿呆鳥</keb>

洗い熊	788
洗熊	159
浣熊	116
アライグマ	115220
洗いグマ	229
洗いぐま	115

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -8,0 +10 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -11,0 +14 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/アライ�
%B0%E3%83%9E

@@ -16,0 +16,4 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>アライグマ</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>
+</r_ele>
@@ -18,0 +22,1 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

位置	18279179
位地	12268
位置情報	532898
位地情報	No matches

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

gg5, prog, daij

Added sense.

@@ -24 +23,0 @@
-<gloss>situation</gloss>
@@ -26,0 +26,7 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>position</gloss>
+<gloss>standing</gloss>
+<gloss>status</gloss>
+<gloss>situation</gloss>

meikyo

@@ -21,0 +22 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

daij, meikyo

@@ -32,0 +33 @@
+<gloss>death</gloss>

gg5, prog

@@ -26,0 +27 @@
+<gloss>close</gloss>

meikyo gg5 daijr

@@ -25 +25,7 @@
-<gloss>the end</gloss>
+<gloss>end</gloss>
+<gloss>ending</gloss>
+<gloss>conclusion</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>end of (one's) life</gloss>

I think I was confused.

gg5, prog
を乾杯し	950

I don't think it's transitive. It's used with に, ために or another verb (like 祝する) in the JE examples.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -29 +29 @@
-<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -31 +31 @@
-<gloss>drink (in celebration or in honor of something)</gloss>
+<gloss>drink (in honor or celebration of someone or something)</gloss>
@@ -35,0 +36 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

No idea.

vt and vi? or just vt?
whay about sense 3? can that gloss be 
improved, also?

@@ -28,0 +29 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kanpai

@@ -22 +22,3 @@
-<gloss>cheers (toast)</gloss>
+<gloss>cheers</gloss>
+<gloss>bottoms-up</gloss>
+<gloss>prosit</gloss>

刺戟 is a valid form listed in most refs

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

Most refs give medical examples for "irritation". It could almost be another sense.

@@ -26 +26 @@
-<gloss>irritation ( of the body, e.g. from an allergen, from a wool sweater )</gloss>
+<gloss>irritation (esp. of the body, e.g. skin, eyes)</gloss>

刺戟	16667	0.2%
刺激	6989575	99.8%

https://www.wordreference.com/enja/irritating

I guess I am "disappearing" the 戟 kanji form, but it sure seems to deserve it.

Long-story-short on the rest: 刺激 means "irritating" in the skin-response-to-chemicals sense, but pretty much nothing else, and definitely not "annoying".  This term is widely misused by English speakers(this unadorned gloss predates jmdictdb), and I think needs some kind of clarification.  

====

I've spent a while looking at this entry, and 刺激性. Wordreference seems to have it figured out.  Under "irritation" in the E->J direction, where there are many potential glosses, 刺激 is limited to (cause discomfort to part of body)/(身体の一部).

irritate⇒ vtr	(annoy) (人) ～をイライラさせる、怒らせる、いら立たせる 他動
  (身体の一部) ～を刺激する、炎症を起させる 他動
  ex. This sweater's a bit irritating if you wear it next to your skin.

Under 刺激 they list:
irritation n	(skin reaction)

That seems a bit narrow. You can 刺激 any tissue of the body I think(lungs, eyes, nose, etc.).

The wikipedia entry for 刺激性 is all about chemical irritants. 刺激性's #1 use is for irritation of the body (skin, eyes, nose, lungs, etc.).  刺激性 as 刺激 + 性 for senses[2] and [3] here is comparatively quite rare.

The unadorned gloss of irritation has, I think, lead to a lot of poor translations. Just a handful of the many bad "examples" on reverso:
Filter packs screen out offensive and irritating Web pages. フィルターパックは攻撃的で刺激性のWebページをふるい落とす。
I have never in my life met someone so irritating.　私は刺激性の誰かに会ったことがない私の人生を持っている。
Please help me to solve this irritating issue by suggesting an optimum solution. ...刺激性の問題...
It is very irritating as you cannot watch your favorite video peacefully. あなたが好きなビデオを平和的に見ることができないので、とても刺激的です。
and on and on....
https://context.reverso.net/翻訳/英語-日本語/irritating

On that list of examples, 刺激性の問題 legitimately exists, but only as "the problem of(skin) irritants". (not "an annoying problem")
皮膚刺激性の問題も事実上ない
https://fams-skin.com/famsbook/famsbook-3621/

I'm open to any other ideas for clarification.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -26 +26 @@
-<gloss>irritation</gloss>
+<gloss>irritation ( of the body, e.g. from an allergen, from a wool sweater )</gloss>

Ok, my bad.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -26 +26,0 @@
-<gloss>irritant</gloss>

儒艮	325
ジュゴン	150541

@@ -6,0 +7 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

Better add ateji.

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_inf>&ateji;</ke_inf>
@@ -8,0 +10 @@
+<ke_inf>&ateji;</ke_inf>

was tagged as gai1 before the merge.  the extent to which it is still gairaigo is arguable, but if we're including the hiragana and we aren't marking the kanji as ateji, then it should probably just be spec1

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

wiki, nipp
http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/ジュゴ�
%B3

@@ -21,1 +21,1 @@
-<gloss>dugong</gloss>
+<gloss>dugong (Dugong dugon)</gloss>

Oops

Not sure only. I just checked the ichiman source document and it only has 故郷/こきょう and 古里/ふるさと so I'll drop the ichi1 from 故郷 in this entry.

@@ -5,4 +5 @@
-<keb>故郷</keb>
-<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>
-<ke_pri>news1</ke_pri>
-<ke_pri>nf06</ke_pri>
+<keb>故郷news1,nf06]</keb>

Meikyo has 古里 first and 故郷 last, shinmeikai has 故郷 first and 古里 second.
I’m not sure what would be best here.
Are the freq tags still applicable here?

故郷	2158360
ふるさと	3520691
ふる里	145201
古里	103750

Probably the cleanest thing. In fact, GG5 has no kanji in its ふるさと entry.
There are 68 sentences; one with ふるさと and 67 with 故郷. My guess is that many people seeing 故郷 would think "ふるさと". For ふるさと 中辞典 has 【古里･故郷】. Should we have "ふる里,古里,故郷" or leave at is it is now? Certainly Googits for 故郷+ こきょう are far lower than for 故郷+ふるさと.

@@ -34,5 +33,0 @@
-<reb>こきょう</reb>
-<re_restr>故郷</re_restr>
-<re_pri>ichi1</re_pri>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
@@ -43,0 +39 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2853884">故郷・こきょう</xref>
@@ -51 +46,0 @@
-<stagr>ふるさと</stagr>

meikyo, shinmeikai, daijs, wisdom,

All of the refs have this split into こきょう and ふるさと
Can we please do the same?
こきょう is marked as a common word in two of the refs and is usually written in kanji.
ふろさと is not marked as common and is usually written in kana.

Quiet. Closing.

Not sure only. I just checked the ichiman source document and it only has 故郷/こきょう and 古里/ふるさと so I'll drop the ichi1 from 故郷 in this entry.

@@ -6 +5,0 @@
-<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>

Meikyo has 古里 first and 故郷 last, shinmeikai has 故郷 first and 古里 second.
I’m not sure what would be best here.
Are the freq tags still applicable here?

故郷	2158360
ふるさと	3520691
ふる里	145201
古里	103750

Probably the cleanest thing. In fact, GG5 has no kanji in its ふるさと entry.
There are 68 sentences; one with ふるさと and 67 with 故郷. My guess is that many people seeing 故郷 would think "ふるさと". For ふるさと 中辞典 has 【古里･故郷】. Should we have "ふる里,古里,故郷" or leave at is it is now? Certainly Googits for 故郷+ こきょう are far lower than for 故郷+ふるさと.

@@ -34,5 +33,0 @@
-<reb>こきょう</reb>
-<re_restr>故郷</re_restr>
-<re_pri>ichi1</re_pri>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
@@ -43,0 +39 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2853884">故郷・こきょう</xref>
@@ -51 +46,0 @@
-<stagr>ふるさと</stagr>

meikyo, shinmeikai, daijs, wisdom,

All of the refs have this split into こきょう and ふるさと
Can we please do the same?
こきょう is marked as a common word in two of the refs and is usually written in kanji.
ふろさと is not marked as common and is usually written in kana.

@@ -26,0 +27 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos>

Unidic/ngrams

Overwhelmingly the most common kanji form.

@@ -4,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ゆりの木</keb>
+</k_ele>

DAJG
gg5: 彼は作品が多いわりに有名でない.　Considering (that) he is a prolific writer, he isn't well known

割に(は) (sense 3) can also come after verbs and adjectives.
I think senses 1 and 2 can be merged. There's no split in the kokugos.

@@ -21 +20,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1983690">割と・わりと</xref>
@@ -23,0 +23,2 @@
+<gloss>fairly</gloss>
+<gloss>rather</gloss>
@@ -25,4 +25,0 @@
-<gloss>rather</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&adv;</pos>
@@ -30 +26,0 @@
-<gloss>unusually</gloss>
@@ -34,5 +30,5 @@
-<s_inf>usu. 〜の割に(は)</s_inf>
-<gloss>considering</gloss>
-<gloss>for one's ...</gloss>
-<gloss>for its ...</gloss>
-<gloss>in spite of</gloss>
+<s_inf>also as 割には</s_inf>
+<gloss>considering ...</gloss>
+<gloss>for ...</gloss>
+<gloss>despite ...</gloss>
+<gloss>in spite of ...</gloss>

2+ weeks and no reaction. Closing.

割に	2700319
割には	1402629
の割に	931941
の割には	531375
Eijiro: 判の割にはこの美術館にはこれといった特徴がない。 : In spite of its reputation, there is nothing particularly distinctive about this museum
GG5: この石は大きさの割には重くない． This stone is not very heavy for its size.
この酒は値段の割には飲める． Considering the price this sake is quite drinkable.
あの若さの割には彼はすることにそつがない． Considering his age, he does everything neatly.

The references don't make this a separate sense, but the usage seems to lie outside the regular adverb definitions. I think this would help, especially as the pattern is common. We already have the specific 年の割に/歳の割に usage as an entry.

@@ -31,0 +32,8 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<s_inf>usu. 〜の割に(は)</s_inf>
+<gloss>considering</gloss>
+<gloss>for one's ...</gloss>
+<gloss>for its ...</gloss>
+<gloss>in spite of</gloss>
+</sense>

@@ -20,0 +21 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1983690">割と・わりと</xref>

Probably enough now. People can read the comments.

I don't think "express a desire" is ideal - I would read it as somebody explicitly saying they want something, when that's not what this 
means - and "to display want" sounds a little unnatural to me. "to indicate" also sounds very intentional and while it can be, it 
certainly doesn't have to be. It also sounds like the "wish" is being pointed out quite clearly when this is more about 

私 being the subject is rare but when it is, the context is about somebody else reacting  e.g. by noticing the speaker's feelings and 
buying something for them. e.g. google results for "私が欲しがって" (all from the first page): 
"空港で私が欲しがってたらきゃんちが買ってくれたお魚シート♪( ´θ｀)ノ"
" “私が欲しがってた バスの降車ボタン 娘が見つけて ガチャってきてくれたよ"
"友達以上恋人未満の彼から、私が欲しがってたアロマセットをプレゼントしてもらいました。"
"夫「ガレージにきて」私「うん」→私が欲しがってた新品のバイクがドーンと置いてあった！"

daijr: ほしいと思う。ほしそうなようすをする。
I think "appear to" (ようす sense 2: "look; appearance") and "seem to" work the best fit here.

@@ -20,2 +20,3 @@
-<gloss>to express a desire</gloss>
-<gloss>to display want</gloss>
+<gloss>to appear to want to have (something)</gloss>
+<gloss>to obviously want</gloss>
+<gloss>to seem to want</gloss>

ルミナス:
父は僕がいつも欲しがっていた自転車を買ってくれた My father bought me the bicycle (which) I had wanted for a long time.
その子はアイスクリームを泣いて欲しがった The child cried for ice cream.
GG5 (-がる)
(1) 〔…という感情･感覚を表す〕
(2) 〔…したいという気持ちを表す〕

I was going to comment that it seems only to be used in the third person (as in all 11 sentences), but then I saw that ルミナス example which is first person.
I think GG5's explanation is good -  the ...を表す is important, It's more about expressing and stating rather than appearing.
I'll suggest some tweaks.

@@ -20,3 +20,3 @@
-<gloss>to appear to desire</gloss>
-<gloss>to seemingly want</gloss>
-<gloss>to apparently wish for</gloss>
+<gloss>to express a desire</gloss>
+<gloss>to display want</gloss>
+<gloss>to indicate a wish for</gloss>

meikyo
が・る〘接尾〙
…という気持ちや様子を外に見せる意を表す。「悲し─・欲し─・恥ずかし─」「寒む─・痛た─・怖わ─」「新し─・珍し─」「いや─・不思議─」「眠た─・煙た─」「会いた─・知りた─・話した
─」「粋─・通─」「強─・得意─（＝ぶる）」 感情や感覚が外部に現れた様子をいう。「悲しがって（＝悲しそうにして）いる姿が哀れだ」

The point I was making is that it won't be obvious from the original glosses that this is a verb you only use to describe what others appear to want. You 
wouldn't say X私はこれほしがっているよね to say "I want this", and I think this needs to be made clear in all -がる entries.

My problem with this suggestion is that none of the 3 JEs I use has any mention of appear/seemingly, and none of the 11 Tanaka sentences does either. The closest I can see is a また at the end of Koj's explanation. The original glosses are pretty close to the ones in the references. I suspect it's used just as a verbification of 欲しい.

OK with the POS change. I think just "aux" is enough.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<pos>&aux-adj;</pos>
+<pos>&aux;</pos>
@@ -31 +31 @@
-<pos>&aux-adj;</pos>
+<pos>&aux;</pos>

daijr, daijs

Changed [aux] to [aux-adj] and added [adj-ku] to reflect the item's inflection paradigm. If accepted entirely or partially, similar corrections should be done to べく and べき.

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<pos>&aux;</pos>
+<pos>&aux-adj;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-ku;</pos>
@@ -21 +22,2 @@
-<pos>&aux;</pos>
+<pos>&aux-adj;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-ku;</pos>
@@ -29 +31,2 @@
-<pos>&aux;</pos>
+<pos>&aux-adj;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-ku;</pos>

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

gg5, chujiten, meikyo

@@ -11,2 +11,3 @@
-<pos>&suf;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="1011430">可き</xref>
+<pos>&aux;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1011430">べき</xref>
+<misc>&form;</misc>
@@ -13,0 +15,18 @@
+<gloss>must</gloss>
+<gloss>should</gloss>
+<gloss>ought to</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&aux;</pos>
+<misc>&form;</misc>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>will (surely)</gloss>
+<gloss>be bound to</gloss>
+<gloss>must</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&aux;</pos>
+<misc>&form;</misc>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<s_inf>indicates volition</s_inf>
+<gloss>will (do)</gloss>
@@ -15,2 +33,0 @@
-<gloss>should</gloss>
-<gloss>must</gloss>

I don't think the x-ref is appropriate.

@@ -13 +12,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2039860">カイゼル髭</xref>

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<misc>&hist;</misc>

GG5, Daijr

A bit opaque.

@@ -13,2 +13,4 @@
-<lsource xml:lang="ger"/>
-<gloss>Kaiser</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2039860">カイゼル髭</xref>
+<lsource xml:lang="ger">Kaiser</lsource>
+<gloss>kaiser</gloss>
+<gloss>emperor</gloss>

gg5, prog

Indeed.

@@ -20,2 +20,5 @@
-<gloss>to exert oneself and win</gloss>
-<gloss>to gain (victory)</gloss>
+<gloss>to win</gloss>
+<gloss>to achieve</gloss>
+<gloss>to gain</gloss>
+<gloss>to obtain</gloss>
+<gloss>to secure</gloss>

shouldn't this read "to win (something)"?
the vt object is what is won

顧客の信頼を勝ち取る

勝ち栗	1115
搗ち栗	No matches
勝栗	4157
搗栗	201

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>勝ち栗</keb>
+<keb>勝栗</keb>
@@ -8,4 +8 @@
-<keb>搗ち栗</keb>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>勝栗</keb>
+<keb>勝ち栗</keb>

nikk prog

@@ -9,0 +9,6 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>勝栗</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>搗栗</keb>

@@ -22 +22 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2229160">その方・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2229160">その方・2</xref>

daij, shinmeikai, saito

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<gloss>this</gloss>
@@ -18 +19,9 @@
-<gloss>this method</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&pn;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2229160">その方</xref>
+<misc>&arch;</misc>
+<misc>&male;</misc>
+<s_inf>used when talking with people of lower status</s_inf>
+<gloss>I</gloss>
+<gloss>we</gloss>

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

koj, meikyo, daijr, daijs

just [pn] in all sources.  could perhaps be [exp,pn]

@@ -14,2 +14 @@
-<pos>&exp;</pos>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&pn;</pos>

利かぬ気	96
きかぬ気	173

Aligning.

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>きかぬ気</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -16 +19 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1003370">利かん気</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1003370">きかん気</xref>
@@ -17,0 +21 @@
+<gloss>unruly (e.g. of a child)</gloss>
@@ -18,0 +23,2 @@
+<gloss>disobedient</gloss>
+<gloss>strong-willed</gloss>

利かぬ気	96
聞かぬ気	33
利かん気	528
聞かん気	181

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>聞かぬ気</keb>
@@ -12,0 +16,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1003370">利かん気</xref>
+<misc>&obsc;</misc>

daij, meikyo

@@ -12,2 +12,14 @@
-<gloss>a person of high morals</gloss>
-<gloss>a Taoist</gloss>
+<gloss>Taoist</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>person of high morals</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>Buddhist monk</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>immortal mountain wizard</gloss>
+<gloss>Taoist immortal</gloss>

背黄青鸚哥	227
セキセイインコ	148392

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

daijr/s
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/セキセイインコ
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Budgerigar
Google n-grams:
脊黄青鸚哥	No matches
背黄青鸚哥	227
せきせいいんこ	3595
セキセイインコ	148392

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>脊黄青鸚哥</keb>
+<keb>背黄青鸚哥</keb>
@@ -17,0 +18,3 @@
+<gloss>common pet parakeet</gloss>
+<gloss>shell parakeet</gloss>
+<gloss>budgie</gloss>

n-grams
せきせいいんこ	23
脊黄青鸚哥	1
セキセイインコ	1925

@@ -9,0 +10,4 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>セキセイインコ</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>
+</r_ele>

gg5, daijr

@@ -12,2 +12 @@
-<gloss>reportage</gloss>
-<gloss>documentary</gloss>
+<gloss>documentary literature</gloss>

〈活／喝／渇／かつ／カツ〉を〈入／い〉れ

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 喝を入れ　 │ 34,047 │ 40.0% │
│ 渇を入れ　 │ 14,475 │ 17.0% │
│ カツを入れ │ 12,999 │ 15.3% │ - add, sK
│ 活を入れ　 │ 12,036 │ 14.2% │
│ 喝をいれ　 │  5,336 │  6.3% │ - add, sK
│ 渇をいれ　 │  2,615 │  3.1% │ - add, sK
│ 活をいれ　 │  1,076 │  1.3% │ - add, sK
│ かつを入れ │    478 │  0.6% │
│ カツをいれ │  1,765 │  2.1% │
│ かつをいれ │    218 │  0.3% │
╰─ーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

The cross reference to 喝 appears to be a leftover from a sense that has been dropped from this entry. Dropping it.

@@ -14,0 +15,16 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>カツを入れる</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>喝をいれる</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>渇をいれる</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>活をいれる</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
@@ -21,0 +38 @@
+<field>&MA;</field>
@@ -27 +43,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2395840">喝</xref>

活を入れる	7935
喝を入れる	15705
渇を入れる	5986

Hmmm

eij has a redirect for 渇を入れる to 活を入れる.

Another irregular form that I came across in a game.

@@ -8,0 +9,4 @@
+<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>渇を入れる</keb>

几案	80
机案	85

Not in the JEs or meikyo/shinmeikai. Daijs has an example from 1900.

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<misc>&obsc;</misc>
+<misc>&obs;</misc>

daij