I'm not sure that etym note is really helpful, by the way.

oft. used with this meaning
梅肉エキス　肉エキス　チキンエキス

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<gloss>stock</gloss>

OK. I'll put things back and spell it out.

@@ -14 +13,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2168240">エキストラクト</xref>
@@ -16 +15,2 @@
-<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<s_inf>abbr. of "extract", not エキストラクト</s_inf>
+<lsource xml:lang="dut"/>

daijs: "(オランダ)extract（抽出物、の意）から"
koj: "extract(オランダ)の略。抽出物・浸出物の意"
meikyo "extract(オランダ)から。抽出物の意"

I'll repeat what I said before. I don't see how this can be tagged as an abbreviation when none of the dictionaries (kokugos or JEs) have an エキストラクト entry.
The etymological notes in the kokugos make it quite clear that エキス is an abbreviation of "extract", not エキストラクト.
By having an abbr tag, we're saying that エキス is the shortened form of エキストラクト, which isn't true.
エキストラクト is also used in Japanese but it came later.

actually, never mind on the note.  i see we have an x-ref to the full form which has the dutch language tag

koj, daij, eiki, gg5

perhaps a note for the lsrc such as [note="abbr. of エキストラクト, from the Dutch \"extract\""], although it is arguably unneeded

i also think the kana here are wacky.  currently it's arranged the same way that we do japanese species names.  but the correct way of writing this is エキス (as in all dictionaries), and 越幾斯 is ateji for エキス, so it shouldn't take a nokanji tag.  i see no relevant google image hits for えきす so i am removing it, but if it's needed, it should be a secondary reading, since it's clearly much much less common than エキス

@@ -9,3 +8,0 @@
-<reb>えきす</reb>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
@@ -13 +9,0 @@
-<re_nokanji/>
@@ -21 +16,0 @@
-<lsource xml:lang="dut"/>

Daijr: 〔エキストラクト（オランダ extract）の略〕

With that note in Daijirin (which I didn't notice last year) I think the abbr and xref can 
go back in. I also think the lsrc can be dropped here.

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2168240">エキストラクト</xref>
@@ -19 +20 @@
-<s_inf>abbr. of "extract"</s_inf>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>

リーダーズ+プラス has エキストラクト.

None of my refs have エキストラクト so I don't think the x-ref or abbr tag is appropriate.
It derives from "extract" but it's not an abbreviation in Japanese.

@@ -18 +17,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2168240">エキストラクト</xref>
@@ -20,2 +19,3 @@
-<misc>&abbr;</misc>
-<gloss>extract (esp. of food, fruit, etc.)</gloss>
+<s_inf>abbr. of "extract"</s_inf>
+<lsource xml:lang="dut"/>
+<gloss>extract (of plants, meat, etc.)</gloss>

a japanese abbreviation, not a foreign one.  therefore, not grg

@@ -14,1 +14,1 @@
-<re_pri>gai1</re_pri>
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

refining sense 3.

@@ -20,0 +21 @@
+<gloss>overly harsh</gloss>
@@ -22 +22,0 @@
-<gloss>corrupt</gloss>

@@ -20 +20 @@
-<gloss>exploitative (of one's employees)</gloss>
+<gloss>exploitative (esp. of employees)</gloss>

All the examples are for sense 2.

daij nikk gg5
daijr says ④  外来語の上に付いて、「不正な」「闇の」などの意を表す。, not adj-na, but I see this is commonly adj-na, though this usage is 
probably more [col] than the [n-pref] (pref?) use. (which is why I did both n-pref and adj-na, though we normally don't)

don't know what to do about sense 2 in terms of pos.


ブラックすぎる	755
"上司のブラックすぎる発言「ちゃんと避妊してる？」「熱があるなんて嘘つくな」「寝不足でも死なない」"
https://news.careerconnection.jp/?p=68594
https://seikatsu-hyakka.com/archives/20769

http://tenagent.jpn.org/100.html
"予想通りと考える方も多いと思いますが、「この会社はブラックだ！」とみんなが思う理由ダントツの1位として、29名の方がサービス残業に対しての不満を挙げまし
た。"
ブラックな会社	342

@@ -11,0 +12,18 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>black (coffee)</gloss>
+<gloss>without cream or milk</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n-pref;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
+<gloss>exploitative (of one's employees)</gloss>
+<gloss>immoral</gloss>
+<gloss>corrupt</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>boldface</gloss>
+<gloss>blackface</gloss>
+<gloss>heavy-faced type</gloss>
+</sense>

I sometimes check twitter for mentions of jmdict/jisho and I've noticed that this entry frequently comes up for discussion. It's apparent there's a sizable contingent of anime/manga fans who are into "lolicon content" that are adamant that being sexually attracted to prepubescent girls is a completely different thing from pedophilia. I don't know anything about Kevin in particular and am certainly not accusing him of anything, but I think we need to be aware there are a lot of people online who are very strongly opposed to "ロリコン" being defined as "pedophile" solely because it makes them feel personally attacked. Here's an example of a recent (June 24) Twitter thread where you can see how this usually plays out: https://twitter.com/COEofTypo/status/1539386476537970689 (there's a lot of replies but here's one that leads into this discussion of our definition as it appeared at the time on Jisho: https://twitter.com/ElFazendobarra/status/1539858524548632576 )

The argument that people on Twitter are making (that it seems Kevin is similarly arguing for) is that "ロリコン" should not be translated as "pedophile" because there are other words in Japanese that are also translated as "pedophilia/pedophile" and there is a distinction between those words (ペドフィリア/小児性愛 etc.) and ロリコン. While this is no doubt true, that it's only ロリコン that is used self-referentially, this doesn't mean that glosses like "male pedophile" or "male pedophilia" don't also belong here. We are not only concerned with getting the nuance right but also conveying the actual meaning of the word. Kevin changed "male pedophilia" to "sexual attraction to young girls" and "male pedophile" to "male with such an attraction", but are these really closer in nuance and meaning to ロリコン or just wordier and wafflier ways of saying the exact same things? That's a rhetorical question - it's obvious to me its the latter. It's hairsplitting. Look up the definitions of "pedophile" and "pedophilia" in any English dictionary. Notice also that ALL the kokugo definitions for ロリコン mention "性欲" - that an otaku-dominated wiki site like pixiv disagrees ("特別な感情" is what they call it) seems entirely irrelevant to me. This isn't a case of "Western bias", it's a case of looking at reliable sources instead of user-generated content.

I agree that "lolicon" rather than "male pedophile" should lead, for nuance etc. reasons, but that word will be meaningless to a lot of people, so we need to also include glosses that pithily explain what this actually means. We always strive for the most economical definitions so why exactly is it that we shouldn't call a spade a spade here?

Another point about the other reference Kevin posted is a blog post written by a person calling himself "初老のオタ" and the argument he is making is that ロリコン IS in fact used to refer to male pedophiles/pedophilia in Japanese media but that he finds this usage "wrong" because he has personally somewhat convolutedly decided that a "ロリコン" is somebody who is "sexually or romantically attracted to underage girls but doesn't necessarily want to act on it in real life" and that a ペド on the other hand is somebody whose "ultimate purpose" (最終目的) is to have sex with underage girls:

"ロリコン、ペド、チャイルド・マレスター……
これらの違いが曖昧な日本ならではの報道だなぁと。
...
少女・幼女に対し性的嗜好や恋愛感情を持つ事で、
最終的目標が性交の有無であるか否かは関係ありません。
...
●ロリは必ずしも性交を最終目的とはしておらず、
　ペドは性交を最終目的としている。"

We should really not be concerned with what "otaku purists" consider the correct use of the word (which by the way still would translate into "male pedophile" in English) but with how it's actually used in mainstream Japanese society. For more on that, see the multiple links I've previously posted.

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<s_inf>oft. used self-referentially</s_inf>
@@ -12,2 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>(often sexual) attraction to young girls</gloss>
-<gloss>male (sexually) attracted to young girls</gloss>
+<gloss>male pedophile</gloss>
+<gloss>male pedophilia</gloss>

I missed this, apologies. Kevin, welcome to JMDict. We always appreciate input on definitions but the multiple accusations of "cultural ignorance", "Western bias", "chauvinism", "strangeness" and  "glibness" are not at all appropriate and if you wish to continue participating in the discussion on how we should define this word, I would hope you would afford other editors more respect than you've done so far. I've changed "male with _such_ an attraction" to "male (sexually) attracted to young girls" because style-wise, we try to avoid glosses that explicitly refer to previous ones. I don't have time right now but I will try and revisit this at a later date as I'm not sure I fully agree with the changes made.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>a male with such an attraction</gloss>
+<gloss>male (sexually) attracted to young girls</gloss>

Hmm. I guess this covers Marcus' view on  "male pedophile" and "male pedophilia" references.

Kevin's case and amendments seem sound but I'd like to see Marcus's response before approving.

日本の場合、ロリコンとペドフィリアが混同され、日常語としての「ペドフィリア」は、ロリコンに比べて病的・犯罪的ニュアンスを伴って使用される場合が多い。(wiki)

現在では幼い少女を性的に好んでいる人のことを指して使われることが多いが、本来ロリータ・コンプレックスとは性的な意味合いは薄く、（異性愛の）女性がロリータ・コンプレックスであるということも大いにありえる。本来は対象は「美」少女に限らない。(pixiv)

https://dic.pixiv.net/a/ロリコン

A whole blog post on the subject:
http://yamatoasuka02.blog.fc2.com/blog-entry-762.html?sp

Video series on the topic:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=lETPaGnl2aI&ab_channel=PauseandSelect

Many of the references given by others below, despite their intentions, clearly imply a distinction between the concepts of lolicon and pedophilia. Some of them, such as the Wiki quote, literally state that they are different concepts. Despite this, this same reference was somehow used to justify including the gloss of "pedophile"? Truly strange, and obviously Western bias.

The pixiv article clearly states that lolicon is not necessarily sexual, which is not something that can be said about the different concept of pedophilia. Indeed, the very fact that "pedophilia" has entered the Japanese lexicon in katakana implies a core difference.

The blog article I provide underscores the fact that this is, at best, a debated topic. The current entry glibly sides with one side of this "debate" in a way that is unscholarly. Japan has a big cultural preference for the young and 未熟, and understanding that at a deep level is essential to understanding why it's inappropriate to glibly label lolicon to be pedophilia.

Honestly, they are quite obviously similar but different concepts, and it's culturally ignorant and chauvinistic to include this gloss.

@@ -12,3 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>sexual attraction to young girls</gloss>
-<gloss>male pedophilia</gloss>
-<gloss>male pedophile</gloss>
+<gloss>(often sexual) attraction to young girls</gloss>
+<gloss>a male with such an attraction</gloss>

https://nikkan-spa.jp/1481525
小児性愛は病気なのか？人口の5％いる彼らの犯罪を防ぐには
さらに、週刊誌報道によると、「中学生時代は遊び相手といえば小さな子どもだった」「いつも小さな子にベタベタと接する」といった記事もあり、今回の事件もいわゆる「ロリコン」――小児性愛者による犯
罪で、しかも、再犯だったと見られる。
...
まず、「ロリコン」とも言われる小児性愛は“病気”なのだろうか？
this article treats ロリコン as a colloquial term for 小児性愛者/小児性愛 (pedophile/pedophilia)

https://www.kadokawa.co.jp/product/301509001364/
"幼児性愛病者（ロリコン）の魔法を完全に解くことができず、10歳の子供と18歳の大人姿の二重生活をしながら王宮に勤めるリーフィア。"
as does this one

https://www.cocolabo.me/loli-com/
"世の中には社会的に認められない欲望というものがあります。その中の一つとして割とメジャーなものが「子どもへの性的欲求」いわゆる「ロリコン」です。
精神医学的には、13歳以下の子どもへ性的欲求を持つことを「幼児性愛」（ペドフェリア）と呼びます。（参考：小児性愛障害-MSDマニュアル）"
and this one

https://www.mag2.com/p/money/1076497
"ロリコン犯罪の温床「性的同意年齢13歳」をすぐに引き上げよ。親の貧困化とSNSも要因、少年少女の性暴力被害者増加＝鈴木傾城"

https://news.yahoo.co.jp/articles/195397d3006e3ef705118829b4e31f779a8068eb
《少女わいせつ》前科3犯・ロリコン容疑者の卑劣な手口と、実母が涙で語る“性依存の闇”
"すでに仕事を引退し、いまは農業を営む両親。40歳近くにもなって自立せず、性犯罪を繰り返すロリコン息子についてどう考えているのか。"
　"改めて翌日、自宅にいる母親を訪ねてみた。すると、
「本当にすみません……。もうどうしていいのか……。息子は完全に（性犯罪の）依存症です……」"

https://www.excite.co.jp/news/article/Tocana_201805_post_16895/
週刊誌記者によると「自宅へのガサ入れで幼児性愛者である証拠品が押収されたとの情報もある。やはりロリコンの線は消せない」という。

https://friday.kodansha.co.jp/article/10174
新潟少女殺害死体遺棄事件 「ロリコン性欲者」小林遼容疑者野放し

https://bunshun.jp/articles/-/29765
子どもへの性加害は「平均週2～3回」小児性犯罪者のすさまじい実態
「そりゃセックスもしましたよ。恋人同士ですもん。それを周りの人たちが、ぶち壊したんです。私がロリコンで、Yちゃんは被害者だといって引き離したんです。
　私はそんな人達によって犯罪者にさせられました。おかしいのはどっちだっていいたいです……」
　これは、12歳の少女に性加害をした49歳の男性の言葉である。

https://somec.org/activity2012.html
"「小児性愛は日本では『ロリコン』など好みの一種とされ、治療が受けにくい状況だ。治せる疾患という認識を社会が共有し、加害者をなくす道を広げるべきだ」と話す。"

https://news.yahoo.co.jp/articles/11ef2d546dd9c5be5d70e3a7eb861825eaed35de
3月場所中「16歳の少女」になりすまし11歳女児を…ロリコン力士の巧妙かつ卑劣な手口

https://dot.asahi.com/webdoku/2017060700082.html
ロリコン大国ニッポン 「アメリカだったら児童ポルノ扱い」

jawiki:ペドフィリア
日本の場合、ロリコンとペドフィリアが混同され、日常語としての「ペドフィリア」は、ロリコンに比べて病的・犯罪的ニュアンスを伴って使用される場合が多い。

https://www.police.pref.wakayama.lg.jp/01_anzen/syonen/kanren/index.html
児童ポルノとは、児童（18歳未満の少年。以下同じ。）を性欲の対象にした、児童のわいせつな画像(写真や動画など)のことをいいます。世間では、「ロリコン」といった呼び方で、児童ポルノを成人向けア
ダルト製品と見る風潮があります。しかしその本質は、児童に対する性犯罪・性的虐待の記録にほかなりません。
Here's a page from the Wakayama Prefectrual police explicitly saying that "lolicon" is the same thing as child pornography.



https://www.animenewsnetwork.com/answerman/2019-08-09/.149914
English language discussion where a manga translator suggests "pedophile" can't be the correct translation for ロリコン because the word "ペドファイル" (a pretty rare word 
in Japanese) exists. I disagree.


Daijs: "幼女・少女にのみ性欲を感じる異常心理"
Daijr: "性愛の対象を少女にのみ求める心理"
Koj: "性的対象として少女・幼女を愛すること。"
Shinjirin: "性愛の対象を少女にのみ求める心理。"
Nikk: "男性が、性愛の対象として少女に偏執すること。"

I think it's remiss to not include the glosses "male pedophile" and "male pedophilia". It's obvious that in Japan, this is how the word is used.

@@ -13 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>person attracted to young girls</gloss>
+<gloss>male pedophilia</gloss>
+<gloss>male pedophile</gloss>

Reopen.

Perhaps this addresses Marcus' point? I'll approve and reopen.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>attraction to young girls</gloss>
+<gloss>sexual attraction to young girls</gloss>

Chanced upon this headline just now:
少女買春ロリコン大富豪のジェフリー・エプスタイン逮
捕で新世界秩序の予定が狂う!? 陰謀の世界が大混乱… 
モサドが全方位で暗躍中！

daijr: 性愛の対象を少女にのみ求める心理。
nikk:男性が、性愛の対象として少女に偏執すること。
daijs: 幼女・少女にのみ性欲を感じる異常心理。

I agree 1 sense is actually better, but 
the previous glosses "male pedophile" and 
"male sexually attracted to prepubescent 
girls" align much closer with what's in 
the kokugos. The new glosses on the other 
hand skip out on the "性愛／性欲” part 
(which is in all 3 kokugos) and on the "男
性が、” in nikk. So I don't see how that's 
an improvement.

reopen

english wikipedia

i don't think it's sexist, but i agree that it's too limited.  also, i don't think it's two senses.  we usually put the person in together with the action, etc.

i'm temp approving because i think the existing entry is clearly not right

the proposed "definition" is not appropriate for a japanese-english dictionary

@@ -9,7 +8,0 @@
-<misc>&abbr;</misc>
-<gloss>lolicon</gloss>
-<gloss>male pedophile</gloss>
-<gloss>male sexually attracted to prepubescent girls</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -19 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>male pedophilia</gloss>
+<gloss>attraction to young girls</gloss>
+<gloss>person attracted to young girls</gloss>

The definition of "lolicon" is 
problematic, and I'd like to persuade you 
to update it since it is misinformation 
and sexist.

The definition erroneously uses the 
definition of male paedophile. A 
paedophile is the attraction to 
prepubescent individuals, and pedophilia 
is the attraction itself to prepubescent 
individuals. The term "Lolita" comes from 
the novel and is only about an early 
adolescence girl. Lolita was depicted as 
12 in the novel, and 14 in the film. 99% 
of the depictions of fictional minors in 
the lolicon genre have small breasts. 
Prepubescent children don't have breasts. 
They're flat as a board.

The shotacon entry doesn't say "female 
pedophile". This is sexist because it 
implies only men can have attractions to 
minors. Women can be attracted to female 
and/or male minors and men can be 
attracted to male minors.

Here is my proposed updated definition 
with better parity to shotacon:

ロリコン (lolicon) sometimes shortened to 
ロリ (loli), is a Japanese slang 
portmanteau of the phrase "lolita complex" 
and describes an attraction to early 
adolescent girls, or an individual with 
such an attraction, although it has become 
a blanket term to refer to any minor 
attracted person/attraction to a minor. 
Outside Japan, the term is used less often 
with this meaning, and is used to refer to 
a genre of manga and anime wherein mostly 
preadolescent or early adolescent female 
characters are depicted in a suggestive or 
erotic manner.

daij　gg5 jawiki
Daij and jawiki say "lolita complex" is wasei. Enwiki has 
no article on "lolita complex", only on "lolicon" 
(interestingly, that page does not show up in Google 
searches)

I don't think ロリ and ロリコン should be the same entry. 
Splitting out ロリ
_
Based on enwiki, it seems "lolicon" can refer both to 
the "phenomenon" and the "person" in English. I think 
the English term refers esp. to a

@@ -7,3 +7,7 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>ロリ</reb>
-</r_ele>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<gloss>lolicon</gloss>
+<gloss>male pedophile</gloss>
+<gloss>male sexually attracted to prepubescent girls</gloss>
+</sense>
@@ -13 +16,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2399250">小児性愛者</xref>
@@ -15,5 +18,2 @@
-<gloss>Lolita complex (sexual attraction to children, esp. young girls)</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&adj-f;</pos>
-<gloss>portraying children in an erotic style</gloss>
+<gloss>lolicon</gloss>
+<gloss>male pedophilia</gloss>

I'll align the ロリータコンプレックス and ロリ glosses.

I don't mind it.

I asked a native speaker btw what they thought and they said （ことばとして）軽いじゃ軽いけど、ペドファイルじゃペドファイル。 I don't think they're actually considered two different things to most Japanese (outside of the otaku realm), but it might certainly be the case that there's a weaker connotation of "actual child molester" than there is for say ペドファイル.

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>sexual obsession with young girls</gloss>

GG5: 〔その男性〕 a man attracted to very young girls.
●あいつはロリコンだ. He's into very young girls. | He has a thing for very young girls.
中辞典:  a sexual obsession with young girls; a “Lolita complex”.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedophilia

I'll accept that pedophile/pedophilia are probably accurate glosses, but I note that the JEs avoid that term. I suspect that in Japan there is a view that lolicon and pedophilia are slightly different things, but if you look at the actual definition of pedophilia, they are really the same.
Is there a problem with including "sexual obsession with young girls" in the glosses?

I sometimes check twitter for mentions of jmdict/jisho and I've noticed that this entry frequently comes up for discussion. It's apparent there's a sizable contingent of anime/manga fans who are into "lolicon content" that are adamant that being sexually attracted to prepubescent girls is a completely different thing from pedophilia. I don't know anything about Kevin in particular and am certainly not accusing him of anything, but I think we need to be aware there are a lot of people online who are very strongly opposed to "ロリコン" being defined as "pedophile" solely because it makes them feel personally attacked. Here's an example of a recent (June 24) Twitter thread where you can see how this usually plays out: https://twitter.com/COEofTypo/status/1539386476537970689 (there's a lot of replies but here's one that leads into this discussion of our definition as it appeared at the time on Jisho: https://twitter.com/ElFazendobarra/status/1539858524548632576 )

The argument that people on Twitter are making (that it seems Kevin is similarly arguing for) is that "ロリコン" should not be translated as "pedophile" because there are other words in Japanese that are also translated as "pedophilia/pedophile" and there is a distinction between those words (ペドフィリア/小児性愛 etc.) and ロリコン. While this is no doubt true, that it's only ロリコン that is used self-referentially, this doesn't mean that glosses like "male pedophile" or "male pedophilia" don't also belong here. We are not only concerned with getting the nuance right but also conveying the actual meaning of the word. Kevin changed "male pedophilia" to "sexual attraction to young girls" and "male pedophile" to "male with such an attraction", but are these really closer in nuance and meaning to ロリコン or just wordier and wafflier ways of saying the exact same things? That's a rhetorical question - it's obvious to me its the latter. It's hairsplitting. Look up the definitions of "pedophile" and "pedophilia" in any English dictionary. Notice also that ALL the kokugo definitions for ロリコン mention "性欲" - that an otaku-dominated wiki site like pixiv disagrees ("特別な感情" is what they call it) seems entirely irrelevant to me. This isn't a case of "Western bias", it's a case of looking at reliable sources instead of user-generated content.

I agree that "lolicon" rather than "male pedophile" should lead, for nuance etc. reasons, but that word will be meaningless to a lot of people, so we need to also include glosses that pithily explain what this actually means. We always strive for the most economical definitions so why exactly is it that we shouldn't call a spade a spade here?

Another point about the other reference Kevin posted is a blog post written by a person calling himself "初老のオタ" and the argument he is making is that ロリコン IS in fact used to refer to male pedophiles/pedophilia in Japanese media but that he finds this usage "wrong" because he has personally somewhat convolutedly decided that a "ロリコン" is somebody who is "sexually or romantically attracted to underage girls but doesn't necessarily want to act on it in real life" and that a ペド on the other hand is somebody whose "ultimate purpose" (最終目的) is to have sex with underage girls:

"ロリコン、ペド、チャイルド・マレスター……
これらの違いが曖昧な日本ならではの報道だなぁと。
...
少女・幼女に対し性的嗜好や恋愛感情を持つ事で、
最終的目標が性交の有無であるか否かは関係ありません。
...
●ロリは必ずしも性交を最終目的とはしておらず、
　ペドは性交を最終目的としている。"

We should really not be concerned with what "otaku purists" consider the correct use of the word (which by the way still would translate into "male pedophile" in English) but with how it's actually used in mainstream Japanese society. For more on that, see the multiple links I've previously posted.

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<s_inf>oft. used self-referentially</s_inf>
@@ -12,2 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>(often sexual) attraction to young girls</gloss>
-<gloss>male (sexually) attracted to young girls</gloss>
+<gloss>male pedophile</gloss>
+<gloss>male pedophilia</gloss>

I missed this, apologies. Kevin, welcome to JMDict. We always appreciate input on definitions but the multiple accusations of "cultural ignorance", "Western bias", "chauvinism", "strangeness" and  "glibness" are not at all appropriate and if you wish to continue participating in the discussion on how we should define this word, I would hope you would afford other editors more respect than you've done so far. I've changed "male with _such_ an attraction" to "male (sexually) attracted to young girls" because style-wise, we try to avoid glosses that explicitly refer to previous ones. I don't have time right now but I will try and revisit this at a later date as I'm not sure I fully agree with the changes made.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>a male with such an attraction</gloss>
+<gloss>male (sexually) attracted to young girls</gloss>

Hmm. I guess this covers Marcus' view on  "male pedophile" and "male pedophilia" references.

Kevin's case and amendments seem sound but I'd like to see Marcus's response before approving.

日本の場合、ロリコンとペドフィリアが混同され、日常語としての「ペドフィリア」は、ロリコンに比べて病的・犯罪的ニュアンスを伴って使用される場合が多い。(wiki)

現在では幼い少女を性的に好んでいる人のことを指して使われることが多いが、本来ロリータ・コンプレックスとは性的な意味合いは薄く、（異性愛の）女性がロリータ・コンプレックスであるということも大いにありえる。本来は対象は「美」少女に限らない。(pixiv)

https://dic.pixiv.net/a/ロリコン

A whole blog post on the subject:
http://yamatoasuka02.blog.fc2.com/blog-entry-762.html?sp

Video series on the topic:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=lETPaGnl2aI&ab_channel=PauseandSelect

Many of the references given by others below, despite their intentions, clearly imply a distinction between the concepts of lolicon and pedophilia. Some of them, such as the Wiki quote, literally state that they are different concepts. Despite this, this same reference was somehow used to justify including the gloss of "pedophile"? Truly strange, and obviously Western bias.

The pixiv article clearly states that lolicon is not necessarily sexual, which is not something that can be said about the different concept of pedophilia. Indeed, the very fact that "pedophilia" has entered the Japanese lexicon in katakana implies a core difference.

The blog article I provide underscores the fact that this is, at best, a debated topic. The current entry glibly sides with one side of this "debate" in a way that is unscholarly. Japan has a big cultural preference for the young and 未熟, and understanding that at a deep level is essential to understanding why it's inappropriate to glibly label lolicon to be pedophilia.

Honestly, they are quite obviously similar but different concepts, and it's culturally ignorant and chauvinistic to include this gloss.

@@ -12,3 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>sexual attraction to young girls</gloss>
-<gloss>male pedophilia</gloss>
-<gloss>male pedophile</gloss>
+<gloss>(often sexual) attraction to young girls</gloss>
+<gloss>a male with such an attraction</gloss>

https://nikkan-spa.jp/1481525
小児性愛は病気なのか？人口の5％いる彼らの犯罪を防ぐには
さらに、週刊誌報道によると、「中学生時代は遊び相手といえば小さな子どもだった」「いつも小さな子にベタベタと接する」といった記事もあり、今回の事件もいわゆる「ロリコン」――小児性愛者による犯
罪で、しかも、再犯だったと見られる。
...
まず、「ロリコン」とも言われる小児性愛は“病気”なのだろうか？
this article treats ロリコン as a colloquial term for 小児性愛者/小児性愛 (pedophile/pedophilia)

https://www.kadokawa.co.jp/product/301509001364/
"幼児性愛病者（ロリコン）の魔法を完全に解くことができず、10歳の子供と18歳の大人姿の二重生活をしながら王宮に勤めるリーフィア。"
as does this one

https://www.cocolabo.me/loli-com/
"世の中には社会的に認められない欲望というものがあります。その中の一つとして割とメジャーなものが「子どもへの性的欲求」いわゆる「ロリコン」です。
精神医学的には、13歳以下の子どもへ性的欲求を持つことを「幼児性愛」（ペドフェリア）と呼びます。（参考：小児性愛障害-MSDマニュアル）"
and this one

https://www.mag2.com/p/money/1076497
"ロリコン犯罪の温床「性的同意年齢13歳」をすぐに引き上げよ。親の貧困化とSNSも要因、少年少女の性暴力被害者増加＝鈴木傾城"

https://news.yahoo.co.jp/articles/195397d3006e3ef705118829b4e31f779a8068eb
《少女わいせつ》前科3犯・ロリコン容疑者の卑劣な手口と、実母が涙で語る“性依存の闇”
"すでに仕事を引退し、いまは農業を営む両親。40歳近くにもなって自立せず、性犯罪を繰り返すロリコン息子についてどう考えているのか。"
　"改めて翌日、自宅にいる母親を訪ねてみた。すると、
「本当にすみません……。もうどうしていいのか……。息子は完全に（性犯罪の）依存症です……」"

https://www.excite.co.jp/news/article/Tocana_201805_post_16895/
週刊誌記者によると「自宅へのガサ入れで幼児性愛者である証拠品が押収されたとの情報もある。やはりロリコンの線は消せない」という。

https://friday.kodansha.co.jp/article/10174
新潟少女殺害死体遺棄事件 「ロリコン性欲者」小林遼容疑者野放し

https://bunshun.jp/articles/-/29765
子どもへの性加害は「平均週2～3回」小児性犯罪者のすさまじい実態
「そりゃセックスもしましたよ。恋人同士ですもん。それを周りの人たちが、ぶち壊したんです。私がロリコンで、Yちゃんは被害者だといって引き離したんです。
　私はそんな人達によって犯罪者にさせられました。おかしいのはどっちだっていいたいです……」
　これは、12歳の少女に性加害をした49歳の男性の言葉である。

https://somec.org/activity2012.html
"「小児性愛は日本では『ロリコン』など好みの一種とされ、治療が受けにくい状況だ。治せる疾患という認識を社会が共有し、加害者をなくす道を広げるべきだ」と話す。"

https://news.yahoo.co.jp/articles/11ef2d546dd9c5be5d70e3a7eb861825eaed35de
3月場所中「16歳の少女」になりすまし11歳女児を…ロリコン力士の巧妙かつ卑劣な手口

https://dot.asahi.com/webdoku/2017060700082.html
ロリコン大国ニッポン 「アメリカだったら児童ポルノ扱い」

jawiki:ペドフィリア
日本の場合、ロリコンとペドフィリアが混同され、日常語としての「ペドフィリア」は、ロリコンに比べて病的・犯罪的ニュアンスを伴って使用される場合が多い。

https://www.police.pref.wakayama.lg.jp/01_anzen/syonen/kanren/index.html
児童ポルノとは、児童（18歳未満の少年。以下同じ。）を性欲の対象にした、児童のわいせつな画像(写真や動画など)のことをいいます。世間では、「ロリコン」といった呼び方で、児童ポルノを成人向けア
ダルト製品と見る風潮があります。しかしその本質は、児童に対する性犯罪・性的虐待の記録にほかなりません。
Here's a page from the Wakayama Prefectrual police explicitly saying that "lolicon" is the same thing as child pornography.



https://www.animenewsnetwork.com/answerman/2019-08-09/.149914
English language discussion where a manga translator suggests "pedophile" can't be the correct translation for ロリコン because the word "ペドファイル" (a pretty rare word 
in Japanese) exists. I disagree.


Daijs: "幼女・少女にのみ性欲を感じる異常心理"
Daijr: "性愛の対象を少女にのみ求める心理"
Koj: "性的対象として少女・幼女を愛すること。"
Shinjirin: "性愛の対象を少女にのみ求める心理。"
Nikk: "男性が、性愛の対象として少女に偏執すること。"

I think it's remiss to not include the glosses "male pedophile" and "male pedophilia". It's obvious that in Japan, this is how the word is used.

@@ -13 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>person attracted to young girls</gloss>
+<gloss>male pedophilia</gloss>
+<gloss>male pedophile</gloss>

Reopen.

Perhaps this addresses Marcus' point? I'll approve and reopen.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>attraction to young girls</gloss>
+<gloss>sexual attraction to young girls</gloss>

Chanced upon this headline just now:
少女買春ロリコン大富豪のジェフリー・エプスタイン逮
捕で新世界秩序の予定が狂う!? 陰謀の世界が大混乱… 
モサドが全方位で暗躍中！

daijr: 性愛の対象を少女にのみ求める心理。
nikk:男性が、性愛の対象として少女に偏執すること。
daijs: 幼女・少女にのみ性欲を感じる異常心理。

I agree 1 sense is actually better, but 
the previous glosses "male pedophile" and 
"male sexually attracted to prepubescent 
girls" align much closer with what's in 
the kokugos. The new glosses on the other 
hand skip out on the "性愛／性欲” part 
(which is in all 3 kokugos) and on the "男
性が、” in nikk. So I don't see how that's 
an improvement.

reopen

english wikipedia

i don't think it's sexist, but i agree that it's too limited.  also, i don't think it's two senses.  we usually put the person in together with the action, etc.

i'm temp approving because i think the existing entry is clearly not right

the proposed "definition" is not appropriate for a japanese-english dictionary

@@ -9,7 +8,0 @@
-<misc>&abbr;</misc>
-<gloss>lolicon</gloss>
-<gloss>male pedophile</gloss>
-<gloss>male sexually attracted to prepubescent girls</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -19 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>male pedophilia</gloss>
+<gloss>attraction to young girls</gloss>
+<gloss>person attracted to young girls</gloss>

The definition of "lolicon" is 
problematic, and I'd like to persuade you 
to update it since it is misinformation 
and sexist.

The definition erroneously uses the 
definition of male paedophile. A 
paedophile is the attraction to 
prepubescent individuals, and pedophilia 
is the attraction itself to prepubescent 
individuals. The term "Lolita" comes from 
the novel and is only about an early 
adolescence girl. Lolita was depicted as 
12 in the novel, and 14 in the film. 99% 
of the depictions of fictional minors in 
the lolicon genre have small breasts. 
Prepubescent children don't have breasts. 
They're flat as a board.

The shotacon entry doesn't say "female 
pedophile". This is sexist because it 
implies only men can have attractions to 
minors. Women can be attracted to female 
and/or male minors and men can be 
attracted to male minors.

Here is my proposed updated definition 
with better parity to shotacon:

ロリコン (lolicon) sometimes shortened to 
ロリ (loli), is a Japanese slang 
portmanteau of the phrase "lolita complex" 
and describes an attraction to early 
adolescent girls, or an individual with 
such an attraction, although it has become 
a blanket term to refer to any minor 
attracted person/attraction to a minor. 
Outside Japan, the term is used less often 
with this meaning, and is used to refer to 
a genre of manga and anime wherein mostly 
preadolescent or early adolescent female 
characters are depicted in a suggestive or 
erotic manner.

daij　gg5 jawiki
Daij and jawiki say "lolita complex" is wasei. Enwiki has 
no article on "lolita complex", only on "lolicon" 
(interestingly, that page does not show up in Google 
searches)

I don't think ロリ and ロリコン should be the same entry. 
Splitting out ロリ
_
Based on enwiki, it seems "lolicon" can refer both to 
the "phenomenon" and the "person" in English. I think 
the English term refers esp. to a

@@ -7,3 +7,7 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>ロリ</reb>
-</r_ele>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<gloss>lolicon</gloss>
+<gloss>male pedophile</gloss>
+<gloss>male sexually attracted to prepubescent girls</gloss>
+</sense>
@@ -13 +16,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2399250">小児性愛者</xref>
@@ -15,5 +18,2 @@
-<gloss>Lolita complex (sexual attraction to children, esp. young girls)</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&adj-f;</pos>
-<gloss>portraying children in an erotic style</gloss>
+<gloss>lolicon</gloss>
+<gloss>male pedophilia</gloss>

gg5, eij

@@ -16 +16,12 @@
-<gloss>(South) Korea</gloss>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1637350">大韓民国</xref>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<gloss>South Korea</gloss>
+<gloss>Republic of Korea</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2816630">大韓帝国</xref>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<gloss>Korean Empire (1897-1910)</gloss>

GG5: sense 8: 【素】 〔原料･下地〕 (raw) material(s); a base.
プリンのもと an instant pudding mix
市販されているケーキのもと a commercial premix for a cake batter
スープのもと 〔即席スープ〕 instant soup; 〔スープの下地〕 (soup) stock.
スープのもと	10607
スープの素	124224
プリンのもと	579
プリンの素	5814

In sense 4, I think. I wondered about "uk" as in GG5, but it seems not.

@@ -49,0 +50,3 @@
+<gloss>base</gloss>
+<gloss>mix</gloss>
+<gloss>stock</gloss>

https://www.amazon.co.jp/s?k=の素&ref=nb_sb_noss_1
チャーハンの素
カオマンガイの素
etc.

〇〇の素 

is often "easy-to-make mix"
should this be added to sense 4 or should it perhaps be a separate sense?

大辞泉 大辞林

Sense 10 is in 大辞泉, not in 大辞林.

@@ -36,0 +36,1 @@
+<gloss>basis</gloss>
@@ -37,0 +38,1 @@
+<gloss>root</gloss>
@@ -47,0 +49,1 @@
+<gloss>material</gloss>
@@ -60,1 +63,2 @@
-<gloss>trunk</gloss>
+<gloss>(plant) root</gloss>
+<gloss>(tree) trunk</gloss>
@@ -72,0 +76,5 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>handle (chopsticks, brush, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>grip</gloss>
+</sense>

Getting picky in my old age.

@@ -16,2 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>Edo (old name of Tokyo)</gloss>
-<gloss>Yedo</gloss>
+<gloss>Edo (shogunate capital, now Tokyo)</gloss>
+<gloss>Yedo (former romanization)</gloss>

* daijr J-E
* https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=Edo,Yedo,Yeddo,Jeddo

Useful to also have the older romanization for a historical term.

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<gloss>Yedo</gloss>

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>old name of Tokyo</gloss>
+<gloss>Edo (old name of Tokyo)</gloss>

Koj (has "参勤交代・参覲交代"), ngrams (参勤交代 is the most common form.)

Merging 1302240.

@@ -5,0 +6,6 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>参覲交代</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>参勤交替</keb>
@@ -12,0 +19 @@
+<gloss>official attendance service (by a daimyo in the Edo era)</gloss>

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shelf_life#Parallel_names
http://www.maff.go.jp/j/fs/f_label/f_processed/limit.html

@@ -12,3 +12,3 @@
-<gloss>“best before” date</gloss>
-<gloss>use-by-date</gloss>
-<gloss>expiry date</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2233960">消費期限</xref>
+<gloss>"best before” date</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">not as tasty, but still safe, to eat after this date</gloss>

GG5, etc.

@@ -12 +12,3 @@
-<gloss>best if eaten by this date</gloss>
+<gloss>“best before” date</gloss>
+<gloss>use-by-date</gloss>
+<gloss>expiry date</gloss>

wiki gg5 koj daijs

@@ -19 +19,3 @@
-<gloss>Silla (ancient Korean kingdom)</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1300410">三国・さんごく・4</xref>
+<gloss>Silla</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">ancient Korean kingdom (57 BC - 935 AD)</gloss>

@@ -19,2 +19 @@
-<gloss>Silla</gloss>
-<gloss g_type="expl">ancient Korean kingdom</gloss>
+<gloss>Silla (ancient Korean kingdom)</gloss>

daijs, nikk, wiki

@@ -14,0 +14,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>しんら</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -16,1 +19,2 @@
-<gloss>ancient Korean kingdom</gloss>
+<gloss>Silla</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">ancient Korean kingdom</gloss>

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss>daimyo (Japanese feudal lord)</gloss>
+<gloss>daimyō (Japanese feudal lord)</gloss>

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1883030">小名</xref>

GG, koujien

@@ -20,0 +20,6 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&arch;</misc>
+<gloss>China</gloss>
+<gloss>foreign country</gloss>
+</sense>

daij

The Jomon period sense isn't in the refs so I don't think it should come first.
Adding detail to the other sense.

@@ -15,0 +16,4 @@
+<gloss>straw-rope pattern pressed into earthenware</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -20,4 +23,0 @@
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>straw-rope pattern</gloss>
-</sense>

@@ -16 +16,6 @@
-<gloss>Jomon period</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1825130">縄文時代・じょうもんじだい</xref>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<gloss>Jōmon period</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>

I don't think so. It's more technical. The JEs use much the same order as we do.

Shouldn't calorific value be the first gloss in sense 1?

new sense appearing in recent years
daijs: https://kotobank.jp/word/熱量-111455
probably in the 4th ed. of daijr as the editors have noted it:
https://pj.ninjal.ac.jp/corpus_center/lrw/LRW2016-yamamoto-slides.pdf (see slides 30-33)

@@ -20,0 +21,6 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>(degree of) enthusiasm</gloss>
+<gloss>zeal</gloss>
+<gloss>passion</gloss>
+</sense>

gg5, prog

Plural form of calorie makes more sense.

@@ -15,0 +16,2 @@
+<gloss>quantity of heat</gloss>
+<gloss>heat value</gloss>
@@ -17,2 +19 @@
-<gloss>quantity of heat</gloss>
-<gloss>calorie</gloss>
+<gloss>calories</gloss>

Re: もも, I'm not sure it needs to be split 
out?

@@ -43,0 +44,5 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<stagr>もも</stagr>
+<pos>&n-pref;</pos>
+<gloss>great in number</gloss>

I agree with Robin. While frequency is appropriate for ordering in most cases, something like numerals is a bit of an exception, and I think sticking to the leading kanji form is best.

@@ -4,4 +3,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>１００</keb>
-<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
-</k_ele>
@@ -12,0 +9,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>１００</keb>
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>

Numbers constitute a special category of words that can be written in different ways depending on context. That's true in both English and Japanese. I don't think the usual policy of leading with the most common form necessarily applies here.
Also, we lead with the kanji forms for numbers 1-10 (even though they're more commonly written using Arabic numerals). I don't see why 百 should be any different.

100個: 10 tweets past 15 min
百個: 1 past hr

100年前 12 past hr
百年前 2 past hr

With very few exceptions, we lead with the 
most common surface form in the kanji field. 
If we lead with 百, we're implicitly telling 
users that this is the most common form, but 
it isn't, and in more cases than not, they 
will be better off using it as "100" rather 
than "百”.
I don't think leading with １００ is weird in 
the context of this dictionary, considering 
how Japanese words have many different surface 
forms which we list separately from the 
reading, which in one sense is the real 
Japanese "word" of the entry.

meikyo (もも); 〔古〕ひゃく。また、名詞の上に付いて、きわめて数の多いことを表す。「━の官」「━度・━種」

Should 百 not come first? I think leading with a number (rather than a word) in a dictionary looks a little odd. Even if "100" is more common overall, there are many terms and expressions where it's always/usually written "百".
I suggest splitting out もも into a separate entry (with two senses).

It's not needed to get the entry as a whole marked as a "P" one, but it gets that form marked.

@@ -27,0 +28 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

This was brought up on the mailing list (was unable to respond because of a mailing list issue).

Do I need to add spec1 to the ひゃく reading as well?

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>

brit 
一〇〇式司令部偵察機
日本陸軍の高速・長航続の司令部偵察機。百式司偵ともいう。

@@ -17,0 +18,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>一〇〇</keb>

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>１００</keb>
+</k_ele>

はく is in kojien, but is potentially just kanwa

Merging 2207900.

@@ -8,0 +9,6 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>陌</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>佰</keb>
@@ -17,0 +24,6 @@
+<re_restr>百</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>はく</reb>
+<re_restr>陌</re_restr>
+<re_restr>佰</re_restr>
@@ -20,0 +33 @@
+<s_inf>陌 and 佰 are used in legal documents</s_inf>

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<gloss>ancient Korean kingdom (18 BC - 660 AD)</gloss>
+<gloss>ancient Korean kingdom (18 BCE - 660 CE)</gloss>

gg5 koj daijs wiki

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>Baekje (ancient Korean kingdom)</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1300410">三国・さんごく・4</xref>
+<gloss>Baekje</gloss>
@@ -13,0 +15 @@
+<gloss>ancient Korean kingdom (18 BC - 660 AD)</gloss>

Daijr. Has two other readings.

enwiki jawiki daijr brit 世界大百科事典

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>ancient Korean kingdom (Paekche or Kudara)</gloss>
+<gloss>Baekje (ancient Korean kingdom)</gloss>
+<gloss>Paekche</gloss>

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1506990">平安時代・へいあんじだい</xref>

@@ -29,0 +30 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1537740">弥生時代</xref>
@@ -30,0 +32 @@
+<gloss>Yayoi culture</gloss>

Koj kanwa: わたる・いよいよ・いや
Wiktionary: ひさしい (hisashii, 弥しい); わたる (wataru, 弥る); あまねし (amaneshi, 弥し); いよいよ (iyoiyo, 弥)
JIS X 0208 1995 discussion draft: や,あまねし,いや,いよいよ,とおい,ビ,ひさ,ひさし,ひさしい,ミ,わたる
JIS X 0208 1997 & JIS 漢和字典: や,いや, いよいよ
Morohashi: all the ones in the JIS draft and more
UniHan: HISASHII TOOI YA

What a mess.
Johan's suggestion lines up with what Shibano et al. settled on. I'm inclined to settle on that too, but maybe squeeze in わたる as well.
BTW, Unidic has 弥る as an alternative surface form for 練る/ねる. I won't go there.

Words in JMDict with kun-readings of 弥
---------------------------------------
や	弥生	1119950
	弥次	 116008
	弥四	   1475
	弥の明後日	    263
	弥猛心	     39
-------------------------------	
いや	弥栄	60749
	弥が上に	 1662
	弥増す	  241
	弥従兄弟	    0
----------------------------	
いよ	弥々	 9809
---------------------------	
よ	弥立つ	  797

The kanji 弥 has the following kun reading in KanjiDic:
  いや, や, あまねし, いよいよ, とおい, ひさし, ひさ.しい, わた.る
Above is a table of all words in JMDict with kun readings of 弥.
We see that there are no examples of あまねし, とおい, ひさし, ひさ.しい and わた.る.
The reading いよいよ is from 弥々(いよいよ) and is misleading. Here the kanji is read いよ,
so I think the reading should be either いよ or いよ.いよ.
The reading よ only occurs in 弥立つ so I think we can treat as irregular and skip it.
I propose the following list of kun readings
  や, いや, いよ.いよ.

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
立つ鳥跡を濁さず	5387
立つ鳥あとを濁さず	4657 // found in subtitles for a tv show
立つ鳥後を濁さず	2910 // irregular kanji usage?

// also these variants, but not as common
たつ鳥あとを濁さず	206
立つ鳥跡をにごさず	36
立つ鳥あとをにごさず	191
立つ鳥後をにごさず	90

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<misc>&proverb;</misc>

新和英中辞典

Example in the entry on 立つ鳥.

@@ -12,1 +12,4 @@
-<gloss>an idiom meaning it is simply common courtesy to clean up after yourself</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1856890">跡を濁す・あとをにごす</xref>
+<gloss>it is simply common courtesy to clean up after yourself</gloss>
+<gloss>a bird does not foul the nest it is about to leave</gloss>
+<gloss>on leaving a place one should see that all is in good order</gloss>

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burakumin

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1499560">部落民</xref>
@@ -14,0 +16 @@
+<misc>&derog;</misc>

my pc IME doesn't know what I'm talking aobut so I think it's arch.
in my Japanese history class they were introduced as "eta" (i.e. in ENglish)

@@ -14,2 +14,3 @@
-<misc>&vulg;</misc>
-<gloss>one group comprising the lowest rank of Japan's Edo-period caste system (people whose work usually involved handling human bodies or animal carcasses)</gloss>
+<misc>&arch;</misc>
+<gloss>eta</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">group comprising the lowest rank of Japan's Edo-period caste system (people whose work usually involved handling human bodies or animal carcasses)</gloss>

日英協会, for example, is the Japan-British Society (GG5)
(not Japan-English)
See also entries in GG5 and Luminous for 日英.

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>Japan and Britain</gloss>

gg5, prog

Maybe this works.

@@ -16,2 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>place of refuge</gloss>
-<gloss>outlet (for an emotion, anger, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>outlet (for one's anger, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>place (to turn one's eyes, to vent one's dissatisfaction, etc.)</gloss>

koj:
やるべき所。持って行く所。「目の―に困る」
daijr: 
やり-ば [0] 【遣り場】
持ってゆく場所。「不満の―がない」「目の―に困る」

I think these glosses can be improved

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>place of refuge (figurative)</gloss>
+<gloss>place of refuge</gloss>

wisdom examples

G n-grams:

遣り場	954
やり場	98993
やりば	3616

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>遣り場</keb>
+<keb>やり場</keb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<keb>やり場</keb>
+<keb>遣り場</keb>
@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2534670">目のやり場</xref>