@@ -3,0 +4,4 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ビッグ便</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
@@ -11,0 +16 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -18,0 +24 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

I think we can trim it to this.

@@ -19 +19 @@
-<s_inf>pun on the clock tower and the word 大便; also written ビッグ便</s_inf>
+<s_inf>pun on 大便; also written ビッグ便</s_inf>

Is that note needed?

Hard to determine how common/established/well-
known it is but there's several examples 
online:
https://mobile.twitter.com/mobi_mobisuke/statu
s/1449680711334576129 (oct 17)
https://mobile.twitter.com/sino53563071/status
/1449637894038056962 (oct 17)
いや、絶対隣のお婆ちゃんビッグベン漏らしてるのよ！！！
匂いが凄いのよ！
https://mobile.twitter.com/adgjmpt09550122/sta
tus/1448984700874211329 (oct 15)
"飲み過ぎて第一次便所ブーム来てます"
"それは大変です！ビッグベンしてもろて"

searching for ~して or ~をして
https://mobile.twitter.com/marchrabbit0615/sta
tus/1425838003637739537 (aug 13)
"ってか、私がもしお店でビッグベンして流せなかったり詰ま
らせたらめっちゃ謝って二度とその店には行けない(´･ω･｀)"
https://mobile.twitter.com/Hornet600pc34TL/sta
tus/1414722223156334594 (Jul 13)
昨日ビッグベンして紙で拭いたら今まで見たことない感じで血
が付着
https://mobile.twitter.com/kujiraarijuk/status
/1395969473425797123 (May 22)
なぜ人がビッグベンをしていふ時に他の人もしようとするのだ
ろうか。
https://mobile.twitter.com/kekenekoSVG/status/
1382575628927393794 (Apr 15)
四畳半くらいの窓のないトイレなのにビッグベンをして換気扇
かけないで立ち去るとかもうバイオテロなのでこれなにかの魔
法律適用させてください

There's relevant real hits for ビッグ便
i.e. oct 16
硬すぎるビッグ便と戦いして勝利した
also oct 16
俺が食べすぎてクソでかいうんこするのが、ビッグ便
Oct 12
ビッグベン←時計、ビッグ便←うんこ

Should maybe be split out considering it' also 
written ビッグ便

@@ -16,3 +16,6 @@
-<misc>&col;</misc>
-<gloss>defecating</gloss>
-<gloss>number 2</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1415010">大便</xref>
+<misc>&joc;</misc>
+<misc>&vulg;</misc>
+<s_inf>pun on the clock tower and the word 大便; also written ビッグ便</s_inf>
+<gloss>poop</gloss>
+<gloss>shit</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬───────┬───────╮
│ 種違い　　 │ 9,018 │ 99.0% │
│ 種ちがい　 │    39 │  0.4% │
│ 胤違い　　 │    33 │  0.4% │ - rK (daijr/s, koj, gg5)
│ たね違い　 │    20 │  0.2% │ - sK
│ たねちがい │     0 │  0.0% │
╰─ーーーーー─┴───────┴───────╯

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -11,0 +13 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

種違い - of a different father; 腹違い - of a different mother.
I think this looks OK.

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1501140">腹違い</xref>

gg5, prog, daij
月代わり	8540
月代り	97
月替わり	114159
月替り	55339

@@ -3,0 +4,9 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>月替わり</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>月替り</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>月代わり</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -12 +21,8 @@
-<gloss>(a) new month starts</gloss>
+<gloss>turn of the month</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<gloss>monthly change</gloss>
+<gloss>monthly replacement</gloss>
+<gloss>changing every month</gloss>

OK

ﾀﾋね was split off from the 死ね entry. I think we should do the same here with ﾀﾋ.
Oxford tags "decease" (the noun) as "formal or Law". I don't think it's needed here.

@@ -14,4 +13,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>ﾀﾋ</reb>
-<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
-</r_ele>
@@ -21 +16,0 @@
-<gloss>decease</gloss>

@@ -12,0 +13,4 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ﾀﾋ</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/タヒ - 「死」を意味するネットスラング。「死」という漢字を分解すると、半角カタカナの「ﾀﾋ」に似ていることから。

I think this would be better in its own entry.

@@ -13,4 +12,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>ﾀﾋ</reb>
-<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

twitter

@@ -12,0 +13,4 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ﾀﾋ</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

GG5: a lease; a leasehold; land-lease rights.

I'd take GG5's order.

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>land-lease rights</gloss>

chujiten has "lease; leasehold"
but the official translation seems to be "land lease right":
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?vm=&re=&id=1944&lvm=02
"一　借地権　建物の所有を目的とする地上権又は土地の賃借権をいう。
(i)　"Land Lease Right"　shall mean superficies or the right to lease land for the purpose of building ownership;"

not sure whether "land lease right" should come first or last?

@@ -31 +31 @@
-<xref type="ant" seq="1401110">相対・そうたい・1</xref>
+<xref type="ant" seq="1401110">相対・1</xref>

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<gloss>absolutely</gloss>
@@ -20 +20,0 @@
-<gloss>absolutely</gloss>

@@ -18 +17,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>

Bulk update n-adv to n,adv
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<pos>&n-adv;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>

We can check this later but I'm not sure sense 1 can be both "adv" and "n-adv".

@@ -16 +16,3 @@
-<gloss>another shop, store, or firm</gloss>
+<gloss>another shop</gloss>
+<gloss>another store</gloss>
+<gloss>another restaurant</gloss>

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<misc>&hist;</misc>

Our usual style.

@@ -12,5 +11,0 @@
-<re_restr>中ソ</re_restr>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>ちゅうそ</reb>
-<re_restr>中蘇</re_restr>
@@ -20 +14,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1075680">ソ連・ソれん</xref>
@@ -22,4 +16 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&pref;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="2643410">中ソ国境紛争・ちゅうソこっきょうふんそう</xref>
+<gloss>Soviet-Chinese</gloss>
@@ -27 +17,0 @@
-<gloss>Soviet-Chinese</gloss>

I think I meant "pref", as in 中ソ国境紛争.

@@ -24 +24,2 @@
-<pos>&suf;</pos>
+<pos>&pref;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2643410">中ソ国境紛争・ちゅうソこっきょうふんそう</xref>

suf or pref?

daij, meikyo, gg5

GG5 is the only ref with のり for 規矩. Probably a mistake.

@@ -12,3 +11,0 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>規矩</keb>
@@ -29,0 +27,4 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>model</gloss>
@@ -35 +36,2 @@
-<gloss>sacred teachings</gloss>
+<gloss>teachings of Buddha</gloss>
+<gloss>Buddhist doctrine</gloss>

I'll approve and reopen. It's scattered around a bit.

Oops

@@ -5 +5,4 @@
-<keb>法,則</keb>
+<keb>法</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>則</keb>

GG5: 法･則･規矩 (4 senses)
ルミナス: 法, 則

Rather a major change, but the original was rather limited.

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>法,則</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -8,4 +11 @@
-<keb>則</keb>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>法</keb>
+<keb>規矩</keb>
@@ -25,0 +26,18 @@
+<gloss>regulation</gloss>
+<gloss>pattern</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<field>&Buddh;</field>
+<gloss>sacred teachings</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>transverse measurement</gloss>
+<gloss>measurement across</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<field>&engr;</field>
+<gloss>side-slope</gloss>
+<gloss>slope</gloss>

日ソ	70880
日蘇	213

Maybe not needed but it shows up in some older texts.

@@ -6,0 +7,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>日蘇</keb>
@@ -14 +16,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<gloss>Japan and the Soviet Union</gloss>

Probably

Should probably be demoted?

@@ -6 +6 @@
-<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>
+<ke_pri>ichi2</ke_pri>
@@ -10 +10 @@
-<re_pri>ichi1</re_pri>
+<re_pri>ichi2</re_pri>
@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<misc>&hist;</misc>

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1170140">種違い</xref>

see 種違い

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -12 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>(brother and sister) born of a different mother</gloss>
+<gloss>half- (sibling by a different mother)</gloss>
+<gloss>paternal</gloss>

chujiten, wisdom, ルミナス

@@ -20 +20 @@
-<gloss>Japanese-style meal</gloss>
+<gloss>Japanese dish</gloss>

Daijr, GG5, etc.

It's a bit more general than a meal. Daijr has "日本風の食事。日本料理。"

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<gloss>Japanese food</gloss>
@@ -19,0 +21 @@
+<gloss>Japanese cuisine</gloss>

OK, we'll leave it.

Well, what I proposed was somewhat of an in-between; it did not go on to list every nuance but instead split both into two groups: those that work grammatically as a copula, and those that do not.
However, the new sense was in part based on the meaning as it does not work as a copula in its meaning either.

In any case, I myself am not entirely sure it is needed, I proposed it as I considered that trying to reconcile "それがだ" with the notion of 'being' could be confusing, and that the additional sense would immediately dispel any doubts.

This proposed edit brings up the issue of what the approach should be for these sorts of entries. Do we basically state what the Japanese terms mean, or do we go into the intricacies of their function in Japanese grammar?
For です/だ:
- GG5 and other JEs take the simple approach, glossing them as "be" and with examples using "is".
- Daijirin has a long introductory explanation beginning with "丁寧の意をもつ断定の助動詞。" and then goes on to six senses.
I favour the simpler approach as in most JEs. I propose switching back to the previous single gloss. I'm comfortable with "aux-v".
I take a similar position with the だ entry.

@@ -16,6 +15,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&prt;</pos>
-<misc>&pol;</misc>
-<s_inf>from [1] used as an interjectory particle</s_inf>
-<gloss>adds emphasis</gloss>

daijr: 【（６）終止形は間投助詞的にも用いられる。助詞「ね」「な」などを伴って用いることが多い。「これが〈です〉ね，いろいろ複雑で〈です〉ね，わからなくなることがよくあります」】

Proposing changes in accordance with those I have presented over on the だ entry.
Adding [aux-v] tag for the same reasons: inflects, is classified as 助動詞 by the daij's, koj and meikyo, and descends from a verb.

@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+<pos>&aux-v;</pos>
@@ -14,0 +16,6 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&prt;</pos>
+<misc>&pol;</misc>
+<s_inf>from [1] used as an interjectory particle</s_inf>
+<gloss>adds emphasis</gloss>

If だ can be tagged "cop" then this can. I'm not a fan of regarding either 
as a copula; it's not Latin.

@@ -9 +9 @@
-<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<pos>&cop;</pos>
@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<s_inf>polite copula</s_inf>

see 種違い

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -15,2 +16,3 @@
-<gloss>half-sibling</gloss>
-<gloss>half-brother or sister</gloss>
+<gloss>half- (sibling by a different father)</gloss>
+<gloss>uterine</gloss>
+<gloss>maternal</gloss>

GG5 (splits senses)

@@ -11,0 +12,3 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1170140">種違い・たねちがい</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1170140">たね違い・たねちがい</xref>
+<gloss>half-sibling</gloss>
@@ -12,0 +16,3 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -14,0 +21 @@
+<gloss>new variety</gloss>

GG5, etc.

@@ -12,0 +13,3 @@
+<gloss>debris flow</gloss>
+<gloss>mudslide</gloss>
+<gloss>landslide</gloss>

Not yoji.

@@ -15 +14,0 @@
-<misc>&yoji;</misc>

Kanji Haitani list

Adding yoji tagAdding yoji tag
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<misc>&yoji;</misc>

koj

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>the Japanese nation under the ritsuryō codes</gloss>
+<gloss>the Japanese nation under the ritsuryō codes (645 CE-10th century)</gloss>

ritsuryo conv test
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>the Japanese nation under the ritsuryo codes</gloss>
+<misc>&hist;</misc>
+<gloss>the Japanese nation under the ritsuryō codes</gloss>

OK

can we move it to the bottom? I think one "correct translation" in the lead is enough, the much more 
common "plum" ones should follow

@@ -21 +20,0 @@
-<gloss>ume orchard</gloss>
@@ -23,0 +23 @@
+<gloss>ume orchard</gloss>

I'd keep it in there.

@@ -20,0 +21 @@
+<gloss>ume orchard</gloss>

Since this is the first gloss in the 梅 
entry... i feel "ume orchard" can confuse 
people who aren't familiar with the word "ume" 
(which I assume is most of everyone)

@@ -20 +20 @@
-<gloss>ume orchard</gloss>
+<gloss>Japanese apricot orchard</gloss>

I'm comfortable with this version.

@@ -11,0 +12,2 @@
+<gloss>standard</gloss>
+<gloss>criterion</gloss>
@@ -13 +14,0 @@
-<gloss>standard</gloss>
@@ -15 +15,0 @@
-<gloss>criterion</gloss>

GG5 (splits senses)

@@ -13,0 +14,5 @@
+<gloss>norm</gloss>
+<gloss>criterion</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>

光輝	172226

They are potentially useful for reverse 
lookups though...

光輝ある	2151
光輝有る	No matches

Not a particularly common example of [noun]ある. I don't think it's needed.

I don't think so. A+B.

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
失敗の虞	No matches
失敗の恐れ	1550
しっぱいのおそれ	No matches

is this entry needed?

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>失敗の虞</keb>
+<keb>失敗の恐れ</keb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<keb>失敗の恐れ</keb>
+<keb>失敗の虞</keb>

@@ -17 +16,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1310720">死・し・3</xref>

@@ -16 +16,5 @@
-<gloss>baseball with no outs</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2490790">ノーアウト</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1310720">死・し・3</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1310720">死・し・3</xref>
+<field>&baseb;</field>
+<gloss>no outs</gloss>

Looks good to me.
should be a sense-wide note

Not really sure it's a conjugation. Makino & Tsutsui (DBJG) call it a "conjectural form", which I think works well. I'll change でしょう to match.

@@ -13,5 +13,5 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1008420">でしょう</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1008420">でしょう</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1008420">でしょう</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1008420">でしょう</xref>
-<s_inf>conjugation of copula だ, expressing conjecture</s_inf>
+<xref type="see" seq="1008420">でしょう・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1008420">でしょう・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1008420">でしょう・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1008420">でしょう・1</xref>
+<s_inf>conjectural form of copula だ</s_inf>

kokugos all say sth like 《断定の助動詞「だ」の未然形＋推量の助動詞「う」》 (daijs)
I think calling this a conjugation of "だ" sounds about right?

not in love with the gloss "I thought you'd say that!".
Note should (probably?) be entry-wide

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<s_inf>conjugation of copula だ, expressing conjecture</s_inf>
@@ -21,0 +23 @@
+<gloss>right?</gloss>

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1771440">あれ程・あれほど</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1771440">あれほど</xref>

forgot to take this out of here when making あ
んだけ a separate entry

@@ -6,4 +5,0 @@
-<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>あんだけ</reb>

GG5, Daijr

@@ -14,0 +14,2 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1771440">あれ程・あれほど</xref>

@@ -16,0 +16,2 @@
+<gloss>that much</gloss>
+<gloss>that many</gloss>

A bit wordy, but I can't think of a suitable trim.

https://dictionary.sanseido-
publ.co.jp/column/sankok18
なかなかマッチョ（男性的）なせりふです。「漢」の字は、
「熱血漢」「硬骨漢」のように、大人のおとこの意味で使わ
れ、ときに力強さを感じさせます。「痴漢」「酔漢」などもあ
りますが、これも大人のおとこです。一方、「男」は、「男
児」「男声」「男優」などと使われますが、これらの場合は、
単に性別のおとこを示しています。

If you search our database for entries ending 
w 漢 then negative words certainly seem to 
dominate. The word that immediately comes to 
my mind is 痴漢 of course. The xref is weird 
though.

Notr can be improved

@@ -27 +27 @@
-<s_inf>oft. negative nuance</s_inf>
+<s_inf>oft. negative or aggressively masculine nuance</s_inf>

Is the note on sense 4 correct/needed? The cross-referenced example certainly doesn't have a negative nuance.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<s_inf>usu. used in compounds</s_inf>
+<s_inf>usu. in compounds</s_inf>

@@ -17 +17,2 @@
-<gloss>Han dynasty (China, 202 BCE-220 CE)</gloss>
+<misc>&hist;</misc>
+<gloss>Han dynasty (of China; 202 BCE-220 CE)</gloss>
@@ -26 +27 @@
-<s_inf>often negative nuance</s_inf>
+<s_inf>oft. negative nuance</s_inf>

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss>Han dynasty (China, 202 BC-220 AD)</gloss>
+<gloss>Han dynasty (China, 202 BCE-220 CE)</gloss>

神仏分離	22434	96.9%
神仏判然	716	3.1%

It should go the other way.

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2849770">神仏判然</xref>

It appears there was a typo in including 神仏判然 in the kanji component, since that word has its own entry. Perhaps it should be made into a reference.

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>神仏分離神仏判然</keb>
+<keb>神仏分離</keb>
@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2849770">神仏判然</xref>

"contrast with" xref I suppose

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>神仏分離</keb>
+<keb>神仏分離神仏判然</keb>
@@ -14 +14,3 @@
-<misc>&yoji;</misc>
+<field>&Shinto;</field>
+<field>&Buddh;</field>
+<misc>&hist;</misc>

Kanji Haitani list

Adding yoji tagAdding yoji tag
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<misc>&yoji;</misc>

It returns かたった alone because it was an exact match. It only returns partial 
matches if there wasn't an exact one. I've added 騙る to that list now.

hi, wwwjdic question.
when I searched for 'katatta' I received the following response:
 かたった (etc.) See: 語る

shouldn't it return this entry as well?
usually it returns multiple entries when multiple matches happen

tidying some of the parentheses.  i don't particularly care for "to lie" in sense 2. 

also sense 1 gets the object wrong.  "swindle" and "cheat" take the victim as a object; 騙る takes the item as an object

@@ -13,3 +13,3 @@
-<gloss>to swindle</gloss>
-<gloss>to cheat</gloss>
-<gloss>to take (something) away by deception</gloss>
+<gloss>to swindle out of</gloss>
+<gloss>to cheat out of</gloss>
+<gloss>to defraud of</gloss>
@@ -20,2 +20,3 @@
-<gloss>to misrepresent oneself (as)</gloss>
-<gloss>to lie (e.g. about one's name or status)</gloss>
+<gloss>to misrepresent oneself as</gloss>
+<gloss>to pretend to be</gloss>
+<gloss>to assume (a name or title)</gloss>
@@ -23,2 +23,0 @@
-<gloss>to assume (a name)</gloss>
-<gloss>to pretend (to be)</gloss>

https://rekihaku.repo.nii.ac.jp/?
action=pages_view_main&active_action=repository_view_main_item_detail&item_id=1192&item_no=1&page_id=13&block_id=41
"Katsu Kaishu sought to make use of vassals outside of the domain and adopted a method whereby he selected the most 
talented among those who had surrendered at Hakodate and either sent them to serve under the Meiji government or 
dispatched them to other feudal domains. Examples of these men who were dispatched to other domains to provide 
instruction in education and military affairs are to be found in the well-known “Okashinin”, or “loaned persons” who 
went to work in the various domains, including Wakayama, Tsuyama, Nagoya and Fukui. These Okashinin took up their new 
roles by either one of two methods: they were either sent to domains directly by the Shizuoka domain upon their return 
home, or they had been sent to the various domains to serve their period of confinement and were subsequently employed 
locally."
https://ir.library.osaka-u.ac.jp/repo/ouka/all/47108/20772_要旨.pdf
第４章「静岡藩の御貸人」、および第５章「箱館戦争降伏人と静岡藩」は、幕府が培い蓄積してきた能力の高さ・
豊富さが、藩士を、降伏人であるかどうかに関わりなく、御貸人として他藩や他地域に派遣することによって、人的
交流や「知識の共有化」を実現したことを明らかにした。

Nor is 貸人...
there's some evidence of the term (some more reuslts for お貸人 also) but it seems extremely obscure.

G n-grams: No matches

This isn't in any of my refs.

gloss can maybe be improved

@@ -13 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>exported teachers during Meiji period</gloss>
+<misc>&hist;</misc>
+<gloss>exported teachers (during Meiji period)</gloss>

Entry created

daij, meikyo

The forehead doesn't have any hair growing on it to begin with.

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>shaved part of the forehead</gloss>
+<gloss>top part of the head that is shaved from the forehead to the crown</gloss>

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<misc>&arch;</misc>
+<misc>&hist;</misc>

Entry created

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<s_inf>チョン is often a racist term for Koreans</s_inf>
+<s_inf>チョン is also an ethnic slur for Koreans</s_inf>

Sens but not vulg, methinks

@@ -14 +13,0 @@
-<misc>&vulg;</misc>

X is pretty much defunct anyway

@@ -15,2 +15,1 @@
-<misc>&X;</misc>
-<s_inf>note that チョン is often a racist term for Koreans</s_inf>
+<s_inf>チョン is often a racist term for Koreans</s_inf>

should this really be X-marked? It CAN be used as a racist 
remark, but that's not the original meaning (similar to "to 
call a spade a spade")

My bad.

gg5, daij
支配下	        220402	  
支配下に	        144328	  
支配下の	        22091	    
支配下にある	19280

It is a noun.

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -12 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>under control (e.g. of territory)</gloss>
+<gloss>under the control (of)</gloss>
+<gloss>under the dominion (of)</gloss>

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

Entry created

gg5, daij

@@ -18 +18,2 @@
-<gloss>2.4 cm (traditional unit used to measure shoe sizes)</gloss>
+<gloss>mon</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">traditional unit used for shoe and sock sizes (approx. 2.4 cm)</gloss>

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<misc>&hist;</misc>

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">one-thousandth of a kan (obsolete unit of currency in use between 1336-1870)</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">one-thousandth of a kan (unit of currency 1336-1870)</gloss>

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>one-thousandth of a kan (obsolete unit of currency)</gloss>
+<gloss>mon</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">one-thousandth of a kan (obsolete unit of currency in use between 1336-1870)</gloss>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/磐座

we often refer to Shinto gods as deities

@@ -15,2 +15,2 @@
-<misc>&arch;</misc>
-<gloss>dwelling place of a god (usu. in reference to a large rock)</gloss>
+<field>&Shinto;</field>
+<gloss>dwelling place of a deity (usu. in reference to a large rock)</gloss>

Entry created

Usually phrased like this in literature

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<gloss>syncretism of Shinto and Buddhism</gloss>
+<gloss>Shinto-Buddhist syncretism</gloss>

@@ -11,0 +12,2 @@
+<field>&Shinto;</field>
+<field>&Buddh;</field>

Entry created

daijr

@@ -12,3 +12,3 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2249000">五刑</xref>
-<misc>&arch;</misc>
-<gloss>imprisonment (for one to three years)</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2249000">五刑・2</xref>
+<misc>&hist;</misc>
+<gloss>imprisonment (for 1-3 years; third most severe of the five ritsuryō punishments)</gloss>

Entry created

daijr

@@ -12,3 +12,3 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2249000">五刑</xref>
-<misc>&arch;</misc>
-<gloss>exile</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2249000">五刑・2</xref>
+<misc>&hist;</misc>
+<gloss>exile (second most severe of the five ritsuryō punishments)</gloss>

Entry created

Better.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-singapore-
graffiti-sentence-idUSKBN0M10DK20150305
 A Singapore court sentenced two Germans to 
nine months in prison and three strokes of the 
cane on Thursday after they pleaded guilty to 
breaking into a depot and spray-painting 
graffiti on a commuter train carriage.

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<gloss>public caning (60-100 times; second least severe of the five ritsuryō punishments)</gloss>
+<gloss>public caning (60-100 strokes; second least severe of the five ritsuryō punishments)</gloss>

daijr

@@ -12,3 +12,3 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2249000">五刑</xref>
-<misc>&arch;</misc>
-<gloss>severe caning (60-100 times)</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2249000">五刑・2</xref>
+<misc>&hist;</misc>
+<gloss>public caning (60-100 times; second least severe of the five ritsuryō punishments)</gloss>

Entry created

8-)}

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<gloss>caning (10-50 strokes; least severe of the five risturyō punishments)</gloss>
+<gloss>caning (10-50 strokes; least severe of the five ritsuryō punishments)</gloss>

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<gloss>caning (10-50 times; least severe of the five risturyō punishments)</gloss>
+<gloss>caning (10-50 strokes; least severe of the five risturyō punishments)</gloss>

daijr

The caning itself probably wasn't light.

@@ -12,3 +12,3 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2249000">五刑</xref>
-<misc>&arch;</misc>
-<gloss>light caning (10-50 times)</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2249000">五刑・2</xref>
+<misc>&hist;</misc>
+<gloss>caning (10-50 times; least severe of the five risturyō punishments)</gloss>

Entry created

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1738990">律令制</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2249000">五刑・2</xref>
@@ -18 +18 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2249000">五刑</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2249000">五刑・1</xref>

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<gloss>five punishments (of the ritsuryo system: light caning, severe caning, imprisonment, exile, death)</gloss>
+<gloss>five punishments (of the ritsuryō system: light caning, severe caning, imprisonment, exile, death)</gloss>

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<misc>&arch;</misc>
+<misc>&hist;</misc>
@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<misc>&hist;</misc>

Entry created

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>Xia dynasty (of China; ca 2070-1600 BCE; possibly mythological)</gloss>
+<gloss>Xia dynasty (of China; ca. 2070-1600 BCE; possibly mythological)</gloss>

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>Xia dynasty (of China; c. 2070-1600 BCE; possibly mythological)</gloss>
+<gloss>Xia dynasty (of China; ca 2070-1600 BCE; possibly mythological)</gloss>

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>Xia dynasty (of China; perhaps c. 2070-1600 BCE, perhaps mythological)</gloss>
+<gloss>Xia dynasty (of China; c. 2070-1600 BCE; possibly mythological)</gloss>

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>Xia dynasty (China, perhaps c. 2070-1600 BCE, perhaps mythological)</gloss>
+<misc>&hist;</misc>
+<gloss>Xia dynasty (of China; perhaps c. 2070-1600 BCE, perhaps mythological)</gloss>

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<gloss>Western Zhou dynasty (of China; c 1046-771 BCE)</gloss>
+<gloss>Western Zhou dynasty (of China; ca. 1046-771 BCE)</gloss>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1331020">周・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1331020">周・3</xref>

@@ -13 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>Western Zhou dynasty (China, c 1046-771 BCE)</gloss>
+<misc>&hist;</misc>
+<gloss>Western Zhou dynasty (of China; c 1046-771 BCE)</gloss>

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>Western Chou dynasty</gloss>

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>Western Zhou (dynasty of China)</gloss>
+<gloss>Western Zhou dynasty (China, c 1046-771 BCE)</gloss>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1331020">周・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1331020">周・3</xref>

@@ -13 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>Eastern Zhou dynasty (China, 771-256 BCE)</gloss>
+<misc>&hist;</misc>
+<gloss>Eastern Zhou dynasty (of China; 771-256 BCE)</gloss>

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>Eastern Zhou dynasty (China, c. 771-256 BCE)</gloss>
+<gloss>Eastern Zhou dynasty (China, 771-256 BCE)</gloss>

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<gloss>Later Zhou dynasty</gloss>
+<gloss>Eastern Chou dynasty</gloss>

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<gloss>Eastern Chou dynasty</gloss>
+<gloss>Later Zhou dynasty</gloss>

dynasty conversion
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<gloss>Secretariat (Tang-dynasty China)</gloss>
+<gloss>Secretariat (Tang dynasty China)</gloss>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2254320">三省・さんしょう</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2254320">三省・2</xref>

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<misc>&hist;</misc>

Entry created

dynasty conversion
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<gloss>Chancellery (Tang-dynasty China)</gloss>
+<gloss>Chancellery (Tang dynasty China)</gloss>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2254320">三省・さんしょう・2</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2254320">三省・2</xref>

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2254320">三省・さんしょう</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2254320">三省・さんしょう・2</xref>
+<misc>&hist;</misc>

Entry created

dynasty conversion
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<gloss>Department of State Affairs (Tang-dynasty China)</gloss>
+<gloss>Department of State Affairs (Tang dynasty China)</gloss>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2254320">三省・さんしょう</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2254320">三省・2</xref>

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<misc>&hist;</misc>

Entry created

I think it can go.

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<misc>&abbr;</misc>

Is "abbr" needed for terms that contain 米/べい? Technically アメリカ is an abbreviation of アメリカ合衆国 but we wouldn't consider アメリカ政府 an abbreviation.

Harmless, and certainly useful for glossing.

日本政府　	1088813 (an entry)
中国政府　	406033
韓国政府　	293248
米政府　　	195198　←
アメリカ政府	148995
米国政府　	120768
フランス政府	46712
英政府　　	27699
イギリス政府	24806
ドイツ政府	18450
仏政府　　	12341
韓政府　　	2448
独政府　　	2020

Needed? It's common, but so are a whole lot of other similar words.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>U.S. government</gloss>
+<gloss>US government</gloss>

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<gloss>dissolution of the zaibatsu during the US occupation of Japan</gloss>
+<gloss>dissolution of the zaibatsu (during the US occupation of Japan)</gloss>

@@ -14 +14,2 @@
-<gloss>dissolution of zaibatsu</gloss>
+<misc>&hist;</misc>
+<gloss>dissolution of the zaibatsu during the US occupation of Japan</gloss>

Entry created

Splitting on source language.

@@ -10 +9,0 @@
-<lsource xml:lang="ice"/>
@@ -12 +10,0 @@
-<gloss>króna (Icelandic currency)</gloss>

In the vanilla EDICT both will be krona.

wiki

@@ -10 +10,3 @@
-<gloss>krona (currency)</gloss>
+<lsource xml:lang="ice"/>
+<gloss>krona (Swedish currency)</gloss>
+<gloss>króna (Icelandic currency)</gloss>

@@ -10 +10 @@
-<gloss>krona</gloss>
+<gloss>krona (currency)</gloss>

2002 wasn't that long ago but I think hist is a useful tag for terms like this.

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<misc>&hist;</misc>
@@ -10 +11 @@
-<gloss>pfennig (monetary unit)</gloss>
+<gloss>pfennig (monetary unit; 1/100 of a mark)</gloss>

ateji possibly 	布
https://www.benricho.org/kanji/tani-kanji.html#07

@@ -10 +10 @@
-<gloss>pfennig</gloss>
+<gloss>pfennig (monetary unit)</gloss>

Entry created

See 唐代.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2207640">明・みん</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2207640">明</xref>
@@ -14 +14,2 @@
-<gloss>Ming dynasty (of China; 1368-1644)</gloss>
+<gloss>Ming period (China; 1368-1644)</gloss>
+<gloss>Ming era</gloss>

@@ -13 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>Ming dynasty (China, 1368-1644)</gloss>
+<misc>&hist;</misc>
+<gloss>Ming dynasty (of China; 1368-1644)</gloss>

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>Ming dynasty</gloss>
+<gloss>Ming dynasty (China, 1368-1644)</gloss>

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>Ming dinasty</gloss>
+<gloss>Ming dynasty</gloss>

Aligning.

@@ -13,2 +13 @@
-<misc>&abbr;</misc>
-<gloss>(US) Federal Reserve Board</gloss>
+<gloss>Federal Reserve Board (US)</gloss>

連邦準備制度理事会	16143 <- Daijr & the major EJs
米連邦準備制度理事会	9761 <- above + 米
米連邦準備理事会	18963 <- this entry
連邦準備理事会	22658 <- this entry wo 米

It seems to be an abbreviation of 連邦準備制度理事会 with 米 on the front.
I suggest (a) adding an entry for 連邦準備制度理事会 (I'll do it), (b) dropping the 米 prefix from this.
Of course, they could all move to enamdict too.

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>米連邦準備理事会</keb>
+<keb>連邦準備理事会</keb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>べいれんぽうじゅんびりじかい</reb>
+<reb>れんぽうじゅんびりじかい</reb>
@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2850889">連邦準備制度理事会</xref>
@@ -13 +14,2 @@
-<gloss>US Federal Reserve Board</gloss>
+<gloss>(US) Federal Reserve Board</gloss>
+<gloss>FRB</gloss>

is this an abbr?

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>U.S. Federal Reserve Board</gloss>
+<gloss>US Federal Reserve Board</gloss>

Entry created

Let's drop it.

0 ngrams. Very few www hits not from here. I wouldn't mind dropping it.

not real

@@ -15 +14,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1420140">男色・1</xref>

@@ -18,1 +18,2 @@
-<gloss>male homosexual (pejorative)</gloss>
+<misc>&derog;</misc>
+<gloss>male homosexual</gloss>
@@ -20,0 +21,1 @@
+<gloss>poofter</gloss>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2249000">五刑</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2249000">五刑・1</xref>

Entry created

google images agree w coping, top rail, but the kokugos describe something kinda different:

koj: 鳥居や門・板塀などの上にわたす横木
daijr: 鳥居・門・板塀などの上縁に，横に渡す木。
daijs: 鳥居や門・塀・手すりなどの上端に渡す横木。
these sound more like a cross-beam/lintel?

google results for 鳥居 笠木 show it being the upper part of the top cross-beam, which is sometimes looks like top 
rail/coping, but in other instances is just a beam

@@ -14,0 +15,5 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<field>&archit;</field>
+<gloss>top part of the upper cross-beam of a torii</gloss>

I don't think an expl gloss is necessary.
I can't find a source (besides eijiro) for "cap piece" or "head board".

@@ -15,3 +14,0 @@
-<gloss>cap piece</gloss>
-<gloss>head board</gloss>
-<gloss g_type="expl">what covers the top of a wall, torii or gate, not necessarily made of wood</gloss>

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>coping (architecture)</gloss>
+<field>&archit;</field>
+<gloss>coping</gloss>

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>long cloak worn by soldiers, students, etc. (Meiji period)</gloss>
+<gloss>long cloak (worn by soldiers, students, etc. in the Meiji period)</gloss>

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<misc>&hist;</misc>

koj, daij

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>釣り鐘マント</keb>
@@ -12,1 +15,1 @@
-<gloss>type of cloak worn by soldiers and students</gloss>
+<gloss>long cloak worn by soldiers, students, etc. (Meiji period)</gloss>

koj daij

I think "perhaps not much, but some" is an awkward-sounding gloss.
"in any way" was for contexts like "If I could help in any way ..." but I'm fine with dropping it. It's potentially misleading.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>at least a bit</gloss>
+<gloss>(even) if only a little</gloss>
@@ -14,2 +14 @@
-<gloss>even if only a little</gloss>
-<gloss>perhaps not much, but some</gloss>
+<gloss>in the slightest way</gloss>

https://www.weblio.jp/content/多少なりとも
https://hinative.com/ja/questions/14778079 彼はここで生まれ育ったので、多少なりとも道は知ってるはずだ。＝少しは知ってるはずだ。
https://meaning-book.com/blog/20190504163722.html
https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=多少なりとも

「目の前にいるのは、男装の麗人。男とみまがうにはあまりに麗しすぎる。さらに、多少なりともある胸のふくらみ、触りがいありそうなヒップラインが、彼女が女であることを示している。」

"in any way" seems wrong or too context dependent?

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>in any way</gloss>
+<gloss>at least a bit</gloss>
@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<gloss>perhaps not much, but some</gloss>

The term is used in Australia, but it probably isn't general enough to have here.

@@ -15 +14,0 @@
-<gloss>rates</gloss>

"rates"? is that correct?

Daijirin, GG5, 新和英中辞典, ルミナス

google etc.
native osb informer agreess with どりい but there's much more evidence of とりい online (and in English, it's always "Senbon 
torii", never "senbon dorii")

https://kyototravel.info/senbontorii
"千本概要（せんぼんとりい）は本殿から奥社奉拝所（奥の院） に向う参道にあります。"
https://kyoto-universal.jp/sp/detail.php?lid=19
「千本鳥居（せんぼんとりい）」としてとくに有名です。

"千本鳥居" "せんぼんとりい" site:ac.jp 4 results
"千本鳥居" "せんぼんどりい" site:ac.jp 0

"千本鳥居" "せんぼんとりい" site:co.jp 17 
"千本鳥居" "せんぼんどりい" site:co.jp 0

@@ -7,0 +8,3 @@
+<reb>せんぼんとりい</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -12 +15 @@
-<gloss>many torii</gloss>
+<gloss>rows of torii gates (e.g. at Kyoto's Fushimi Inari shrine)</gloss>

nikk

Looks OK

https://eng.nihongodecarenavi.jp/eng/entry_6576.html
"welfare telephone (call)"
https://www.city.fuji.shizuoka.jp/machi/c1105/fmervo0000006884-att/fmervo000000dfxj.pdf
"Financial assistance for Telephone Equipment for the Disabled (FUKUSHI DENWA)"
https://www.city.koto.lg.jp/212106/fukushi/koresha/service/jisshi/6591.html
高齢者福祉電話の貸与・料金助成
緊急時等の連絡手段の確保として、電話回線をお持ちでない方には電話回線の貸与及び料金の一部を助成します。また、本人名義の電話回線をお
持ちの方には料金の一部を助成します。耳が不自由な方で希望される方には、めいりょう（黒電話のみ対応）の設置をします。

daijr: 一人暮らしの高齢者や身体障害者宅に地方公共団体が設置する電話。

Maybe something like this is better?

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>care telephone (e.g. for the aged, disabled, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>easy-to-use telephone equipment provided free of charge or at a rebated cost for elderly or disabled who live alone</gloss>

the gloss is not entirely clear to me, but i can't think of anything better

Daijr, ＫＯＤ追加語彙

Better translation?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Value_proposition

Tweaking. It's a bit opaque.

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>promise of value</gloss>

https://www.gramco.co.jp/question/302.html
英語ではバリュープロポジション(Value Proposition)。
https://www.bridgedesigners.com/topics/4039/
顧客課題と提供価値を整理する「バリュープロポジションキャンバス」の使い方

https://context.reverso.net/translation/japanese-english/提供価値

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>value provided (by product, service, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>value proposition</gloss>

I'll let it in, as revised.

@@ -12,1 +12,1 @@
-<gloss>value proposition</gloss>
+<gloss>value provided (by product, service, etc.)</gloss>

i agree with the revised meaning, and i don't see a need for this entry, really

Ref? I can't see support for this gloss. Maybe "value provided (by product, service, etc.)" is closer to what I am seeing.

冒険資本	                32
ベンチャーキャピタル	111960

Very few relevant hits online.

@@ -11,0 +12,3 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1120340">ベンチャーキャピタル</xref>
+<field>&bus;</field>
+<misc>&obsc;</misc>

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

Eijiro, 研究社ビジネス英和辞典, リーダーズ+プラス

I'll try to merge our suggestions.

This fork has bypassed an edit proposed by Marcus. Can one of you rationalize them?

daijr/s
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/cookie-cutter#Adjective

Plenty of hits online for "Kintaro-ame".
Sense 2 isn't adj-na.

@@ -13,2 +13,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2685780">金太郎・2</xref>
-<gloss>cylindrical candy made so that Kintaro's face appears wherever it is sliced</gloss>
+<gloss>Kintarō-ame</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">cylindrical stick-shaped candy made so that Kintarō's face appears wherever it is sliced</gloss>
@@ -17 +17,2 @@
-<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<gloss>cookie-cutter (e.g. solution)</gloss>
@@ -20 +20,0 @@
-<gloss>stamped out like cookies</gloss>

Daijr, ルミナス

A bit easier to handle, I think.

@@ -18,1 +18,0 @@
-<gloss>cookie-cutter</gloss>
@@ -20,0 +19,2 @@
+<gloss>all the same</gloss>
+<gloss>stamped out like cookies</gloss>

http://news.tbs.co.jp/newseye/tbs_newseye2059811.html
「今までの公立の教育が金太郎飴すぎて、多様な子どもたちに即してこなかった」（佐賀・武雄市　樋渡啓祐市長）

In the phrase 金太郎飴すぎて, it's being used as some sort of adjective: "too cookie-cutter."

@@ -16,0 +16,5 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
+<gloss>cookie-cutter</gloss>
+<gloss>inflexibly uniform</gloss>
+</sense>

I don't think abbr is needed here.

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<misc>&abbr;</misc>

@@ -14 +13,0 @@
-<gloss>U.S. stocks</gloss>

@@ -14,0 +14,1 @@
+<gloss>U.S. stocks</gloss>

eij, over 1 mil hits

felt like a note indicating what it's an abbr of wasn't 
strictly necessar

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">teenagers who dressed flamboyantly and danced in Harajuku, Tokyo, from the late 1970s to the mid-1980s</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">teenagers who dressed flamboyantly and danced in Harajuku, Tokyo, from the late 1970s to the mid 1980s</gloss>

mypedia seems to suggest it survived until late 1990s: 東京の原宿から代々木公園までの日曜日の歩行者天国で，奇抜な無国籍ファッシ
ョンで踊っていた若者の集団をいう。... 渋滞を理由に1998年６月歩行者天国が中止されて自然消滅した。
daijs:
「ブティック竹の子」からという。

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<s_inf>named after Harajuku clothing store Boutique Takenoko</s_inf>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/竹の子族

The Wikipedia article only mentions dancing.

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">people who partied flamboyantly in Harajuku, etc. in the 70s and 80s</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">teenagers who dressed flamboyantly and danced in Harajuku, Tokyo, from the late 1970s to the mid-1980s</gloss>

@@ -13 +13,3 @@
-<gloss>people who partied flamboyantly in Harajuku, etc. in the 70s and 80s</gloss>
+<misc>&hist;</misc>
+<gloss>Takenoko Tribe</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">people who partied flamboyantly in Harajuku, etc. in the 70s and 80s</gloss>

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<s_inf>esp. on school menus</s_inf>
@@ -15 +16 @@
-<gloss>curry and rice (esp. on school menus)</gloss>
+<gloss>curry and rice</gloss>

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<field>&food;</field>

They should be separate entries anyway. Everyone's happy. :)

@@ -16,6 +15,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="2461030">クローナ</xref>
-<lsource xml:lang="swe"/>
-<gloss>öre (Swedish monetary unit; 1/100 of a krona)</gloss>

Nobly resisted. Of course, you could have voted for the Euro...

Got... to... fight... instinct... to... move... öre... above.... øre...

@@ -15,2 +15 @@
-<gloss>øre</gloss>
-<gloss g_type="expl">Danish or Norwegian monetary unit equal to one hundredth of a krone</gloss>
+<gloss>øre (Danish or Norwegian monetary unit; 1/100 of a krone)</gloss>
@@ -22,2 +21 @@
-<gloss>öre</gloss>
-<gloss g_type="expl">Swedish monetary unit equal to one hundredth of a krona</gloss>
+<gloss>öre (Swedish monetary unit; 1/100 of a krona)</gloss>

Probably just one sense is OK.

I looked through examples on Google books and it seemed to me that it was always referring to something mass-produced, and was often contrasted with 高級品.

Hm... looking at example sentences,   do think 
there's a distinction here between "commonly 
used product" and "non-premium product". I 
think 2 senses would be better.

I think there's just one sense here. Does this work?

@@ -12,5 +12 @@
-<gloss>popular product</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>regular-quality product</gloss>
+<gloss>mass-market product (i.e. non-premium)</gloss>

Shudder

I don't think we need to make it clear here that a corn dog is a hot dog. If we do, I would prefer an xref 
[see=アメリカンドッグ]

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<field>&food;</field>
@@ -10 +11,2 @@
-<gloss>corn (hot) dog stuffed with cheese</gloss>
+<gloss>corn dog stuffed with cheese</gloss>
+<gloss>cheese corn dog</gloss>

@@ -10 +10 @@
-<gloss>corn (hot)dog stuffed with cheese</gloss>
+<gloss>corn (hot) dog stuffed with cheese</gloss>

I like that version. Certainly not what Americans call a "cheese dog". (Unknown here.)

@@ -9 +9,2 @@
-<gloss>cheese dog</gloss>
+<lsource xml:lang="eng">cheese dog</lsource>
+<gloss>corn (hot)dog stuffed with cheese</gloss>

Maybe "corn dog stuffed with cheese" would be a better gloss.

There's also apparently a synonym ハットグ originating from Korean, which I'm almost certain refers to a corn dog stuffed 
with cheese rather than any other kind of cheese dog. I'll add that once we figure out the wording for this entry.

ハットグ	33-ish tweets past 24 hrs
ハットク 4 tweets

"corn (hot) dog" might be helpful for those who aren't aware of what a corn dog is, but it looks very weird to me and it 
breaks up "corn dog" needlessly which can screw with reverse searches.

@@ -6,0 +7,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ハットク</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -9,0 +13 @@
+<field>&food;</field>
@@ -11 +15,2 @@
-<gloss>corn (hot) dog stuffed with cheese</gloss>
+<gloss>corn dog stuffed with cheese</gloss>
+<gloss>Korean corn dog</gloss>

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<gloss>corn (hot)dog stuffed with cheese</gloss>
+<gloss>corn (hot) dog stuffed with cheese</gloss>

https://www.wordhippo.com/what-is/the/korean-word-for-
fe123c379617afc0105868b6802bd144ec2057bb.html

Seems ok.

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2840983">チーズドッグ</xref>

https://seiryu3.net/2018/11/13/post-2421/
https://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q10201535395
google images

No Google n-gram hits, so this is probably a pretty new term.

Korean romanization taken from Google Translate. Original is 핫도그.