gg5, prog, daij

Two senses in the kokugos.

@@ -17,0 +18,4 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>domestic duties</gloss>
@@ -18,0 +23,2 @@
+<gloss>maid</gloss>
+<gloss>houseboy</gloss>

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<misc>&hist;</misc>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Mandarin (standard variety of Chinese spoken by official classes during the Qing dynasty)</gloss>
+<gloss>Qing Mandarin (standard variety of Chinese spoken by official classes during the Qing dynasty)</gloss>

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mandarin_Chinese

As much as I like the word, we should probably go with something that most people will understand.
This is maybe a better description.

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>Mandarin (group of related Chinese topolects)</gloss>
+<gloss>Mandarin (branch of Chinese spoken in northern and southwestern China)</gloss>

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/topolect

I think this is more accurate (I defer to my old friend Victor Mair on the use of "topolect".)
My earlier version was straight from GG5.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Mandarin (standard variety of Chinese spoken by official classes of the Empire)</gloss>
+<gloss>Mandarin (standard variety of Chinese spoken by official classes during the Qing dynasty)</gloss>
@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>Mandarin (group of related Chinese dialects)</gloss>
+<gloss>Mandarin (group of related Chinese topolects)</gloss>

I'd keep it, but it's not a big deal.

漢時代	15128
唐時代	30352
明時代	10646

I don't think this is needed. A+B. We don't have 〜時代 entries for other Chinese dynasties.

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>Han dynasty (China, 202 BCE-220 CE)</gloss>
+<misc>&hist;</misc>
+<gloss>Han dynasty (of China; 202 BCE-220 CE)</gloss>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Han dynasty (China, 202 BC-220 AD)</gloss>
+<gloss>Han dynasty (China, 202 BCE-220 CE)</gloss>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Han dynasty</gloss>
+<gloss>Han dynasty (China, 202 BC-220 AD)</gloss>

OK

According to the kokugos, only きょう has the "state minister" sense. I think けい should be split out.

@@ -14,3 +13,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>けい</reb>
-</r_ele>
@@ -18 +14,0 @@
-<stagr>きょう</stagr>
@@ -20,0 +17 @@
+<s_inf>after a name</s_inf>
@@ -29,7 +25,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<stagr>けい</stagr>
-<pos>&pn;</pos>
-<misc>&hon;</misc>
-<misc>&arch;</misc>
-<gloss>you (in reference to someone of lower status, esp. by a lord to a subject)</gloss>

"Not claiming that anime dictates "correct" usage ...". I should hope not.
Yes, I'd stick with [arch] for sense 3. I think "life-in-another-knights-and-dragons-fantasy world" counts as "during or before the Edo period".

Well, after hopping over to なんじ/thee/thou, I guess this is [arch], and sankoku probably says 文 because literature and fiction is the only place it appears.

It still seems that most [arch] terms here are [rare]/unlikely-to-be-recognized, so it would be nice if there were some distinction.  But I guess if you read the kind of books where this appears, you'll figure it out.  I still think a split might be appropriate.

@@ -34,2 +34 @@
-<misc>&form;</misc>
-<misc>&hist;</misc>
+<misc>&arch;</misc>

This has its own entry in sankoku, so perhaps not quite [arch]:
[文]君父が臣下を呼ぶことば。なんじ。おんみ。「ーら＝諸君」は…].

some けい examples(I have no idea of the age or context):
https://furigana.info/w/卿:けい

a few lines from the anime where I encountered this, if curious:
卿(けい)に見せるのは初めてだったな

卿とナツキ･スバルの関係は ― 卿は聞き及んでいるのか？ どうして卿(けい)は そこまで...ナツキ･スバルに尽くせる？ (speaker, listener, both female)

卿は私にとって敵ということになる

...

Previous comment discussed breaking off [3] as its own entry. Given that this is evidently in modern use, I would be in favor.

[3]/けい came up in a "life-in-another-knights-and-dragons-fantasy world" anime/manga. It was used repeatedly as a 2nd person pronoun (the "lower status" relationship was definitely present, speaker was a high-class candidate for ruler of an entire midlevel-ish fantasy realm), with the reading けい.  (used ~40 times over two seasons, based on searching the Japanese subtitles). (a few of this were [1], as a suffix to a name, but I heard "kei" repeatedly in a fairly extended dialog and had no idea what it meant). 

Not claiming that anime dictates "correct" usage, but for reference the speaker was female.  Pronoun was used for both female and male recipients.  Both might be considered "subjects" in a broad sense(speaker was making a claim to leadership), but they were actually lower-level members of a competing faction.  sankoku says nothing at all about gender(obviously in a real historical context, the players would generally be male, but this seems unnecessary to specify, and possibly just incorrect). 

The editorial policy does not seem to have guidance on [arch] for this kind of thing(i.e. simple vocabulary). [arch] on kanji and verb forms seems to point towards modern unrecognizability.  I usually read [arch] as "ignore this information for practical purposes".  Apparently not quite the case here.  It looks like this term is *maybe* [arch] in the way that "thou" is [arch] in English.  i.e. still-in-well-understood use for historical flavoring. (Maybe there are other modern uses of 卿/けい, I wouldn't know). (The subtitles gave okurigana for the first use of 卿 in each episode it was used, I don't know how globally understood this would be, or if a reader would just pick it up from context and knowing the "sense" of 卿.)

Incidentally, we have なんじ(汝) as [arch], おんみ(御身) is not.  These are both in sankoku as 文 as well . 汝's definition is simply "おまえ". おんみ gets two senses, one of which matches ours, the other is 古風(...circumstances of use...)あなた。なんじ.

searching subtitles of the same series, 汝 appears once in the regular series, but 20 times in a single two-hour side-movie (different context demanded it, I guess). 御身 appears 3 times(no furigana).

@@ -33,2 +32,0 @@
-<misc>&arch;</misc>
-<misc>&male;</misc>
@@ -36 +34,3 @@
-<gloss>you (in reference to someone of lower status)</gloss>
+<misc>&form;</misc>
+<misc>&hist;</misc>
+<gloss>you (in reference to someone of lower status, esp. by a lord to a subject)</gloss>

gg5

I prefer "district" to "neighbourhood".

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>Ginza (Tokyo neighborhood)</gloss>
+<gloss>Ginza (district in Tokyo)</gloss>

Whoops, seems you're right. Sorry, should have looked into it more before removing.

@@ -22,0 +23,5 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&hist;</misc>
+<gloss>silver mint (Edo period)</gloss>

koj: 江戸幕府直轄の、銀貨の鋳造・発行所。初め伏見・駿府に設置したが、まもなく京都・江戸に移し、また大坂・長崎にも設置。1800年（寛政12）不正事件のため四座ともに廃止し、江戸1カ所のみ再興。

I'm not sure I agree with that removal. It seems to me it referred to a specific type of silver mints, not just one specific silver mint (until 1800)

dynasty conversion
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>Yuan-dynasty Chinese-Mongolian military</gloss>
+<gloss>Yuan dynasty Chinese-Mongolian military</gloss>

元軍	12648

@@ -12,2 +12,2 @@
-<misc>&obsc;</misc>
-<gloss>Yuan-Dynasty Chinese-Mongolian military</gloss>
+<misc>&hist;</misc>
+<gloss>Yuan-dynasty Chinese-Mongolian military</gloss>

Jimmu 9501
Jinmu 2174
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emperor_Jimmu

I'd stick with Jimmu.

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">system of counting years from the start of Emperor Jinmu's reign in 660 BCE</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">system of counting years from the start of Emperor Jimmu's reign in 660 BCE</gloss>

Jinmu or Jimmu? I spelled it "Jimmu" in the 神
武景気 entry...

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">system of counting years from the start of Emperor Jinmu's reign in 660 BC</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">system of counting years from the start of Emperor Jinmu's reign in 660 BCE</gloss>

daijr
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_imperial_year

I think this benefits from an explanation.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1364870">神武</xref>
@@ -12,0 +14 @@
+<gloss g_type="expl">system of counting years from the start of Emperor Jinmu's reign in 660 BC</gloss>

daijr/s, meikyo, shinmeikai

@@ -21,0 +22,5 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&col;</misc>
+<gloss>rich person</gloss>

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<misc>&hist;</misc>

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<misc>&hist;</misc>
@@ -15,0 +17 @@
+<misc>&hist;</misc>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>tutor to a daimyo or other ruler</gloss>
+<gloss>tutor to a daimyo, etc.</gloss>
@@ -15 +15,2 @@
-<gloss>in Meiji, tutor to the emperor or crown prince</gloss>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>tutor to the emperor or crown prince (Meiji period)</gloss>

① 君主に侍して学問を講義すること。また，その人。侍読。 ② 明治時代，天皇・東宮
に書を講じた官職。
大辞林 第三版

@@ -12 +12,4 @@
-<gloss>imperial tutor</gloss>
+<gloss>tutor to a daimyo or other ruler</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<gloss>in Meiji, tutor to the emperor or crown prince</gloss>

I think we should lead with the counter sense. It's by far the most common sense.

@@ -11,4 +11,2 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<misc>&hist;</misc>
-<gloss>Zhou dynasty (of China; approx. 1046-256 BCE)</gloss>
-<gloss>Chou dynasty</gloss>
+<pos>&ctr;</pos>
+<gloss>counter for laps or circuits</gloss>
@@ -22,3 +20,4 @@
-<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
-<pos>&ctr;</pos>
-<gloss>counter for laps or circuits</gloss>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&hist;</misc>
+<gloss>Zhou dynasty (of China; approx. 1046-256 BCE)</gloss>
+<gloss>Chou dynasty</gloss>

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>Zhou dynasty (China, approx. 1046-256 BCE)</gloss>
+<misc>&hist;</misc>
+<gloss>Zhou dynasty (of China; approx. 1046-256 BCE)</gloss>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Zhou dynasty (China, c. 1046-256 BCE)</gloss>
+<gloss>Zhou dynasty (China, approx. 1046-256 BCE)</gloss>

wiki

@@ -12,2 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>Zhou (dynasty of China)</gloss>
-<gloss>Chou</gloss>
+<gloss>Zhou dynasty (China, c. 1046-256 BCE)</gloss>
+<gloss>Chou dynasty</gloss>

gg5, daij

@@ -16 +15,0 @@
-<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
@@ -23,2 +22,2 @@
-<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
-<gloss>dealing</gloss>
+<gloss>business</gloss>
+<gloss>merchant</gloss>
@@ -26 +24,0 @@
-<gloss>store</gloss>
@@ -30 +27,0 @@
-<pos>&n-suf;</pos>

@@ -37 +37,2 @@
-<gloss>Shang dynasty (China, approx. 1600-1046 BCE)</gloss>
+<misc>&hist;</misc>
+<gloss>Shang dynasty (of China; approx. 1600-1046 BCE)</gloss>

We usually use "ca." (circa), but that should be for just one date.

@@ -37 +37 @@
-<gloss>Shang dynasty (China, c. 1600-1046 BCE)</gloss>
+<gloss>Shang dynasty (China, approx. 1600-1046 BCE)</gloss>

re: sense 4, do we usually do "c."?

@@ -32 +32 @@
-<gloss>second degree (of the Japanese &amp; Chinese pentatonic scale)</gloss>
+<gloss>second degree (of the Japanese and Chinese pentatonic scale)</gloss>

No apparent problems. I've added the others.

I'll experiment with ㍼ here to check it doesn't upset downstream systems. I'll approve and reopen.

@@ -8,0 +9,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>㍼</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

㍾　㍽ ㍼ ㍻　㋿
might as well include these as sK, no?

@@ -21 +21,2 @@
-<gloss>Shoki (WWII fighter aircraft)</gloss>
+<misc>&hist;</misc>
+<gloss>Shōki (WWII fighter aircraft)</gloss>

simplifying. strictly speaking not a Japanese concept, but well-known in Japan since way back

@@ -16,2 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>Zhong Kui (traditional Chinese deity said to prevent plagues and ward off evil beings)</gloss>
-<gloss g_type="expl">vanquisher of ghosts and evil beings, and reputedly able to command 80,000 demons</gloss>
+<gloss>Zhong Kui</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">traditional Chinese deity said to prevent plagues and ward off evil and reputedly able to command 80,000 demons</gloss>

Please also align the x-ref.

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<gloss>Shoki the Plague-Queller</gloss>
+<gloss>Shōki the Plague-Queller</gloss>

@@ -30 +30,2 @@
-<gloss>Xin dynasty (China, 9-23 CE)</gloss>
+<misc>&hist;</misc>
+<gloss>Xin dynasty (of China; 9-23 CE)</gloss>

gg5, daij

Added noun sense.

@@ -13,3 +13 @@
-<pos>&n-pref;</pos>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
+<pos>&pref;</pos>
@@ -17,0 +16,5 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>newness</gloss>
+<gloss>novelty</gloss>

@@ -27 +27,2 @@
-<gloss>Xin (dynasty of China)</gloss>
+<gloss>Xin dynasty (China, 9-23 CE)</gloss>
+<gloss>Hsin dynasty</gloss>

I think it should be.

[leg] ok?

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<misc>&leg;</misc>

aligning

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Emperor Jinmu</gloss>
+<gloss>Emperor Jimmu</gloss>

perhaps doesn't belong in edict itself

@@ -12,1 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>legendary founding Emperor of Japan</gloss>
+<gloss>Emperor Jinmu</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">legendary founding Emperor of Japan</gloss>

mk

@@ -26,0 +27 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

Seems to work.

daij, meikyo

The kokugos do have a vs sense. Not sure how common it is. It's not in the JEs.

@@ -22,0 +23,6 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<gloss>facing (e.g. a problem)</gloss>
+<gloss>confronting</gloss>

Can drop the "vs" from here.

@@ -17 +16,0 @@
-<pos>&vs;</pos>

That's あいたいする (to face each other; to be in opposition), which we have as a separate entry.

@@ -25 +25 @@
-<gloss>Ministry of the Treasury (under the ritsuryo system)</gloss>
+<gloss>Ministry of the Treasury (under the ritsuryō system)</gloss>

@@ -19 +19 @@
-<gloss>(former) Ministry of Finance (1869-2001)</gloss>
+<gloss>Ministry of Finance (1869-2001)</gloss>
@@ -23,0 +24 @@
+<misc>&hist;</misc>

daijr/s
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/大蔵省
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ministry_of_the_Treasury

All the refs say 2001.
I don't think the gloss should contain "zaimushou".
Added sense.

@@ -19 +19,6 @@
-<gloss>(former) Ministry of Finance (succeeded by zaimushou in 2000)</gloss>
+<gloss>(former) Ministry of Finance (1869-2001)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1738990">律令制</xref>
+<gloss>Ministry of the Treasury (under the ritsuryo system)</gloss>

@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

Oxford. "an event regarded as a portent of good or evil."
daijs: 何か起こるような感じ...
you don't feel an omen.
on the other hand daijs and daijr do mention 兆し too, so maybe it's fine.

GG5, 中辞典 (both lead with "omen" for sense 2)

A reason for removing it?

@@ -26,0 +27 @@
+<gloss>omen</gloss>

chujtien
not sure if there should be an xref between this and 虫の知らせ and if so, in which direction

@@ -27 +27,2 @@
-<gloss>omen</gloss>
+<gloss>foreboding</gloss>
+<gloss>premonition</gloss>

(おんly) koj

@@ -10,0 +11,2 @@
+<re_pri>news2</re_pri>
+<re_pri>nf25</re_pri>
@@ -14,2 +16,4 @@
-<re_pri>news2</re_pri>
-<re_pri>nf25</re_pri>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>じしろ</reb>
+<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<misc>&hist;</misc>

Our usual style.

@@ -12,5 +11,0 @@
-<re_restr>中ソ</re_restr>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>ちゅうそ</reb>
-<re_restr>中蘇</re_restr>
@@ -20 +14,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1075680">ソ連・ソれん</xref>
@@ -22,4 +16 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&pref;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="2643410">中ソ国境紛争・ちゅうソこっきょうふんそう</xref>
+<gloss>Soviet-Chinese</gloss>
@@ -27 +17,0 @@
-<gloss>Soviet-Chinese</gloss>

I think I meant "pref", as in 中ソ国境紛争.

@@ -24 +24,2 @@
-<pos>&suf;</pos>
+<pos>&pref;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2643410">中ソ国境紛争・ちゅうソこっきょうふんそう</xref>

suf or pref?

meikyo

@@ -23 +23,2 @@
-<gloss>midfield</gloss>
+<field>&sports;</field>
+<gloss>midfield (in soccer)</gloss>

The kokugos and JEs handle this rather differently.

Daijisen

@@ -18,0 +19,4 @@
+<gloss>midpoint</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>

i wouldn't call this a suffix.  it just forms part compound nouns.  we don't indicate this

i see no evidence of it being an adverb either, and at a minimum n-adv certainly shouldn't be the first pos listed

@@ -15 +14,0 @@
-<pos>&n-adv;</pos>

Converting somebody to someone
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -27 +27 @@
-<gloss>talking to somebody in person</gloss>
+<gloss>talking to someone in person</gloss>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -23,0 +24 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

「私は 最後のじか談判に 行くところだった」
キノの旅 —the Beautiful World— 第08話 (Netflix)

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
直談判	46189
じか談判	244
じかだんぱん	170
ジカ談判	No matches
じきだんぱん	No matches

@@ -7,0 +8,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>じか談判</keb>
@@ -15,0 +19 @@
+<re_restr>直談判</re_restr>

gg5, prog

@@ -20,0 +21 @@
+<gloss>direct negotiations</gloss>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

I think it's helpful.

@@ -27 +27 @@
-<gloss>(smartphone or PC) notification</gloss>
+<gloss>notification (on a smartphone, PC, etc.)</gloss>

Should smartphone/PC notifications maybe be a separate [comp] sense here? It\s very spec. つうち in those cases, you 
can't call it 知らせ for example. but a learner wouldn't be able to figure that out by looking at these entries

@@ -23,0 +24,5 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<field>&comp;</field>
+<gloss>(smartphone or PC) notification</gloss>
+</sense>

daij, meikyo, gg5

GG5 is the only ref with のり for 規矩. Probably a mistake.

@@ -12,3 +11,0 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>規矩</keb>
@@ -29,0 +27,4 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>model</gloss>
@@ -35 +36,2 @@
-<gloss>sacred teachings</gloss>
+<gloss>teachings of Buddha</gloss>
+<gloss>Buddhist doctrine</gloss>

I'll approve and reopen. It's scattered around a bit.

Oops

@@ -5 +5,4 @@
-<keb>法,則</keb>
+<keb>法</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>則</keb>

GG5: 法･則･規矩 (4 senses)
ルミナス: 法, 則

Rather a major change, but the original was rather limited.

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>法,則</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -8,4 +11 @@
-<keb>則</keb>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>法</keb>
+<keb>規矩</keb>
@@ -25,0 +26,18 @@
+<gloss>regulation</gloss>
+<gloss>pattern</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<field>&Buddh;</field>
+<gloss>sacred teachings</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>transverse measurement</gloss>
+<gloss>measurement across</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<field>&engr;</field>
+<gloss>side-slope</gloss>
+<gloss>slope</gloss>

I think this word is only used in contexts of ancient history. Can't find any mentions of this in connection with WWII for 
example.
I thought it might be worth stating explicitly that this is a military thing, hence the new gloss. "Expedition" is a little 
ambiguous

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<misc>&hist;</misc>
@@ -13,0 +15 @@
+<gloss>military campaign to the east</gloss>

gg5
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Han_system
https://www.britannica.com/topic/han-Japanese-government-unit

"Han" should be a gloss.

@@ -18,2 +18,3 @@
-<gloss>feudal domain (Edo and early Meiji periods, precursor to current prefectures)</gloss>
-<gloss>fiefdom</gloss>
+<gloss>han (estate of a daimyo in the Edo and early Meiji periods)</gloss>
+<gloss>feudal domain</gloss>
+<gloss>fief</gloss>

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<misc>&hist;</misc>

I read that exchange too, and wondered about dropping "clan". It's in a couple of the JEs, but I think it's really only true in a couple of contexts.

Maybe better left out? 
(discussed in the FB translator's group today)

@@ -20 +19,0 @@
-<gloss>clan</gloss>

no mention of samurai in the kokugos.
koj: 父の敬称

@@ -12,2 +12,2 @@
-<misc>&pol;</misc>
-<gloss>father (esp. used in samurai families prior to the Meiji period)</gloss>
+<misc>&hon;</misc>
+<gloss>father</gloss>

gg5, prog

@@ -18,0 +19,2 @@
+<gloss>Western food</gloss>
+<gloss>Western dish</gloss>
@@ -20,2 +21,0 @@
-<gloss>Western-style meal</gloss>
-<gloss>Western-style food</gloss>

世界大百科事典 第２版

"西洋の料理を意味することばだが，西洋料理がイギリス，フランス，イタリ
ア，ドイツ，アメリカなど，欧米諸国の料理を総称しているのに対して，洋食に
は多分に日本的な要素がふくまれている。"

I meant to say google calls "yoshoku restaurants" 
Japanized Western restaurants btw, if that was a bit 
confusing.
_
Maybe we should have two senses. jawiki: 
"洋食（ようしょく）とは、広義では西洋料理から西洋風の料理全般を指
し、狭義では日本で独自に発展した西洋風の料理を指す日本料理の一カテ
ゴリーである。"

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<gloss>Western cooking</gloss>
@@ -20 +20,0 @@
-<gloss>Western cooking</gloss>
@@ -21,0 +22,3 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>

I'm familiar with "curry rice", but it's plainly Jinglish.

https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?
q=%22curry%20and%20rice%22,%22rice%20and%20cur
ry%22
(google trends "curry and rice", "rice and 
curry")
in the us, it's 50/50, in the UK and 
Australia, "curry and rice" dominates (2,1), 
in India and Sri Lanka, "rice and curry" does 
(2:1).

https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?
q=%22curry%20and%20rice%22,%22rice%20and%20cur
ry%22,%22curry%20rice%22

If you throw "curry rice" into the mix, it 
suddenly dominates the searches in almost 
every country.

I think the entry looks good the way it is.

https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?
content=curry+rice%2C+Japanese+curry&year_star
t=1800&year_end=2019&corpus=26&smoothing=3&dir
ect_url=t1%3B%2Ccurry%20rice%3B%2Cc0%3B.t1%3B%
2CJapanese%20curry%3B%2Cc0

(Japanese curry, curry rice)

I think "curry rice" can mean both "curried 
rice" and "rice and curry", based on what I 
see in google images - but more freq rice and 
curry. also if you look at the way it's 
climbing in the ngrams I think it's reasonable 
to assume the reason it's become so common is 
that it coincides with the rise of Japanese 
curry in the English-speaking world

Either is fine (I'd say "curry and rice") but I don't think we need both as glosses. Also, "curry rice" appears to be another way of saying "curried rice", which isn't the same thing as curry *and* rice.

https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?
content=rice+and+curry%2Ccurry+and+rice%2Ccurr
y+rice&year_start=1800&year_end=2019&corpus=26
&smoothing=3&direct_url=t1%3B%2Crice%20and%20c
urry%3B%2Cc0%3B.t1%3B%2Ccurry%20and%20rice%3B%
2Cc0%3B.t1%3B%2Ccurry%20rice%3B%2Cc0
(comp of rice and curry, curry and rice, curry 
rice)

"curry and rice" doesn't sound natural/like 
the name of a dish to me, but I see it's as 
common as "rice and curry" in the google books 
ngrams (to my surprise). 
I think we might as well include all valid and 
common forms here.

@@ -15,0 +16,2 @@
+<gloss>rice and curry</gloss>
+<gloss>curry rice</gloss>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -16,0 +17,2 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

Google: 鎮定 site:nhk.or.jp
I think this is only used in historical contexts

@@ -17 +17,3 @@
-<gloss>suppression</gloss>
+<misc>&hist;</misc>
+<gloss>suppression (e.g. of a rebellion)</gloss>
+<gloss>pacification</gloss>

That should work.

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<gloss>great, unifying leader</gloss>

year from daijr  - helps set it apart from the earlier but similar 征東将軍

sense 2 is the title used by the shogun, should it have hon? should "great, unifying leader" (that I deleted) move to that 
sense?

@@ -13,2 +13 @@
-<gloss>commander-in-chief of the expeditionary force against the barbarians</gloss>
-<gloss>great, unifying leader</gloss>
+<gloss>commander-in-chief of the expeditionary force against the barbarians (beginning in 794 CE)</gloss>

gg5; luminous; kokugos

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<misc>&hist;</misc>
@@ -14,0 +16,5 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&hist;</misc>
+<gloss>shogun</gloss>
+</sense>

@@ -22 +22 @@
-<gloss>Meitoku era (of reunified Japan; 1392.10.5- 1394.7.5)</gloss>
+<gloss>Meitoku era (of reunified Japan; 1392.10.5-1394.7.5)</gloss>

@@ -22 +22 @@
-<gloss>Meitoku era (of reunified Japan;1392.10.5- 1394.7.5)</gloss>
+<gloss>Meitoku era (of reunified Japan; 1392.10.5- 1394.7.5)</gloss>

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss>Meitoku era (of the Northern Court) (1390.3.26-1392.10.5)</gloss>
+<gloss>Meitoku era (of the Northern Court; 1390.3.26-1392.10.5)</gloss>
@@ -22 +22 @@
-<gloss>Meitoku era (of reunified Japan) (1392.10.5-1394.7.5)</gloss>
+<gloss>Meitoku era (of reunified Japan;1392.10.5- 1394.7.5)</gloss>

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<misc>&hist;</misc>
@@ -16,0 +18,4 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&hist;</misc>

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<misc>&hist;</misc>

http://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/leaf/jn2/140615/m0u/段袋/

Looks OK to me.

koj, daijr, daijs

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>駄袋</keb>
@@ -13,1 +16,4 @@
-<gloss>baggy trousers</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>baggy trousers (worn in the late-Edo and early-Meiji periods by samurai while practising)</gloss>

koj

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>the Japanese nation under the ritsuryō codes</gloss>
+<gloss>the Japanese nation under the ritsuryō codes (645 CE-10th century)</gloss>

ritsuryo conv test
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>the Japanese nation under the ritsuryo codes</gloss>
+<misc>&hist;</misc>
+<gloss>the Japanese nation under the ritsuryō codes</gloss>

GG5: a love story; a romance.
Oldish Koj: 男女の恋愛に関することを記した小説。また、その書物。 森鴎外、ヰタ‐セクスアリス

Isn't saying that 森鴎外's book is an example?

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>Ming Dynasty love story</gloss>
+<gloss>love story</gloss>
+<gloss>romance</gloss>

koj says it's a novel by Mori Ogai?

Ordinary xref.

would ant be ok here? or is "contrast with..." xref better?

@@ -11,0 +12,3 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2838794">市街化調整区域</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2838794">市街化調整区域</xref>
+<field>&law;</field>

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<misc>&hist;</misc>

GG5, etc.

@@ -15 +15,2 @@
-<gloss>the heavens</gloss>
+<field>&Shinto;</field>
+<gloss>High Plain of Heaven (home of the gods)</gloss>

koj daij
daijr: 日本神話の天上界。
leg and/or Shinto?

@@ -6,0 +7,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>たかまのはら</reb>
+</r_ele>

koj

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<misc>&arch;</misc>
+<misc>&obs;</misc>

daijr koj 新解さん ja:WP
http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/陸蒸気

* Qualify as [col,arch], as per dicts
* Add note about usage – all dicts note this as an early Meiji period term (current term is 汽車).
(Saw at railroad museum.)

@@ -12,1 +12,3 @@
-<gloss>steam train</gloss>
+<misc>&col;</misc>
+<misc>&arch;</misc>
+<gloss>steam train (early Meiji period)</gloss>

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>Han dynasty (China, 202 BCE-220 CE)</gloss>
+<misc>&hist;</misc>
+<gloss>Han dynasty (of China; 202 BCE-220 CE)</gloss>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Han dynasty (China, 202 BC-220 AD)</gloss>
+<gloss>Han dynasty (China, 202 BCE-220 CE)</gloss>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Han dynasty</gloss>
+<gloss>Han dynasty (China, 202 BC-220 AD)</gloss>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Han Dynasty</gloss>
+<gloss>Han dynasty</gloss>

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<misc>&hist;</misc>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/薩長
薩長	68380

I feel something so important in Japanese history should have a little more.

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>Satsuma and Chōshū</gloss>
+<gloss>Satsuma and Chōshū (clan alliance)</gloss>

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>Satsuma and Choshu</gloss>
+<gloss>Satsuma and Chōshū</gloss>

I don't think so. A+B.

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
失敗の虞	No matches
失敗の恐れ	1550
しっぱいのおそれ	No matches

is this entry needed?

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>失敗の虞</keb>
+<keb>失敗の恐れ</keb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<keb>失敗の恐れ</keb>
+<keb>失敗の虞</keb>

daijr redir
西南の役	10083
西南戦争	44759

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
@@ -12 +13,3 @@
-<gloss>the Satsuma Rebellion</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2214410">西南戦争</xref>
+<misc>&hist;</misc>
+<gloss>Satsuma Rebellion (1877)</gloss>

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>Tang dynasty (China, 618-907)</gloss>
+<misc>&hist;</misc>
+<gloss>Tang dynasty (of China; 618-907)</gloss>

Wade-Giles

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>T'ang dynasty</gloss>

-> pinyin

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>T'ang Dynasty</gloss>
+<gloss>Tang dynasty (China, 618-907)</gloss>

daij, meikyo

@@ -11,0 +12,3 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1610810">カレーライス</xref>
+<field>&food;</field>
+<lsource ls_wasei="y">rice curry</lsource>

Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ライス・カレー</reb>

@@ -28 +28 @@
-<gloss>five-battalion brigade comprising 2500 men (Zhou-dynasty Chinese army)</gloss>
+<gloss>five-battalion brigade comprising 2500 men (Zhou dynasty Chinese army)</gloss>

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<gloss>one's mentor</gloss>
+<gloss>mentor</gloss>

@@ -27 +27 @@
-<misc>&arch;</misc>
+<misc>&hist;</misc>

@@ -27,0 +27,1 @@
+<misc>&arch;</misc>

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2850896">飯綱使い</xref>

daij, koj

I'll create a 飯綱使い entry if this is approved.

@@ -12,2 +12,9 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2257730">管狐・くだぎつね・1</xref>
-<gloss>mythological pipe fox</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2257730">管狐・1</xref>
+<gloss>izuna</gloss>
+<gloss>pipe fox</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">fox-like spirit kept inside a bamboo tube and used by its master to perform divinations and curses</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<gloss>keeper of an izuna</gloss>

I suggest aligning this with 管狐. Both could have their glosses polished up a bit.

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>a type of fox spirit</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2257730">管狐・くだぎつね・1</xref>
+<gloss>mythological pipe fox</gloss>

koj says it's the same as kuda-gitsune... which has an entry in English Wikipedia.
"The kuda-gitsune or kuda-kitsune (管狐, クダ狐), also pronounced kanko, is a type of spirit possession in legends around 
various parts of Japan. It may be known otherwise as osaki especially in the Kantō region, and also considered 
equivalent to the izuna.

It was believed to assume the guise of a small mammal and able to fit inside a pipe or bamboo tube, but normally only 
its keeper or user (kitsune-tsukai) was able to see it. The user, through the power of the kuda, was believed capable of 
divulging a person's past or fortelling his future; this soothsayer was also capable of performing curses, bringing 
calamity upon targets. In regions where the superstition was held, a prospering household could be accused of achieving 
its prosperity because it was a house possed by the spirit (kuda-tsuki). The fox (and its analogues by other names) was 
said to multiply in number each time a marriage took place, following the bride to her place of marriage, thus 
disseminating into more households."

Added reference to ございます (etymology).
dial=kyb (Kyoto) was likely a typo for dial=kyu (Kyushu), as mentioned in the note this is not Kyoto ben, but Kagoshima ben

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1612690">ございます</xref>
@@ -13 +14 @@
-<dial>&kyb;</dial>
+<dial>&kyu;</dial>

@@ -12 +12,3 @@
-<gloss>(Satsuma) to be</gloss>
+<s_inf>Kagoshima dialect</s_inf>
+<dial>&kyb;</dial>
+<gloss>to be</gloss>

Entry created

A bit wordy, but I can't think of a suitable trim.

https://dictionary.sanseido-
publ.co.jp/column/sankok18
なかなかマッチョ（男性的）なせりふです。「漢」の字は、
「熱血漢」「硬骨漢」のように、大人のおとこの意味で使わ
れ、ときに力強さを感じさせます。「痴漢」「酔漢」などもあ
りますが、これも大人のおとこです。一方、「男」は、「男
児」「男声」「男優」などと使われますが、これらの場合は、
単に性別のおとこを示しています。

If you search our database for entries ending 
w 漢 then negative words certainly seem to 
dominate. The word that immediately comes to 
my mind is 痴漢 of course. The xref is weird 
though.

Notr can be improved

@@ -27 +27 @@
-<s_inf>oft. negative nuance</s_inf>
+<s_inf>oft. negative or aggressively masculine nuance</s_inf>

Is the note on sense 4 correct/needed? The cross-referenced example certainly doesn't have a negative nuance.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<s_inf>usu. used in compounds</s_inf>
+<s_inf>usu. in compounds</s_inf>

@@ -17 +17,2 @@
-<gloss>Han dynasty (China, 202 BCE-220 CE)</gloss>
+<misc>&hist;</misc>
+<gloss>Han dynasty (of China; 202 BCE-220 CE)</gloss>
@@ -26 +27 @@
-<s_inf>often negative nuance</s_inf>
+<s_inf>oft. negative nuance</s_inf>

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss>Han dynasty (China, 202 BC-220 AD)</gloss>
+<gloss>Han dynasty (China, 202 BCE-220 CE)</gloss>

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<misc>&hist;</misc>

Kanji Haitani list

Adding yoji tagAdding yoji tag
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<misc>&yoji;</misc>

Entry created

daijirin and koj have じんむこのかた【神武以来】. I only see the -いらい reading in nikk.

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬───────╮
│ 神武以来　 │ 2,030 │
│ 神武此の方 │     0 │ - add, sK (daijs)
╰─ーーーーー─┴───────╯

@@ -6,0 +7,7 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>神武此の方</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>じんむこのかた</reb>
+</r_ele>

daijs nikk don't list these kanji in their 神武
この方 entries

@@ -9,3 +8,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>じんむこのかた</reb>

神武以来	2030
nikk
other versions ment. in nikk:
神武以往 	No matches
神武この方	No matches
神武此の方	No matches
神武このかた	No matches

align Jimmu
probably doesn't need [n]?

@@ -15 +14,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -17,2 +16 @@
-<misc>&yoji;</misc>
-<gloss>since the era of the Emperor Jinmu</gloss>
+<gloss>since the era of the Emperor Jimmu</gloss>

神仏分離	22434	96.9%
神仏判然	716	3.1%

It should go the other way.

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2849770">神仏判然</xref>

It appears there was a typo in including 神仏判然 in the kanji component, since that word has its own entry. Perhaps it should be made into a reference.

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>神仏分離神仏判然</keb>
+<keb>神仏分離</keb>
@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2849770">神仏判然</xref>

"contrast with" xref I suppose

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>神仏分離</keb>
+<keb>神仏分離神仏判然</keb>
@@ -14 +14,3 @@
-<misc>&yoji;</misc>
+<field>&Shinto;</field>
+<field>&Buddh;</field>
+<misc>&hist;</misc>

Kanji Haitani list

Adding yoji tagAdding yoji tag
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<misc>&yoji;</misc>

Adding yoji tags based on gakken, shinmeikai and-or jitenon
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<misc>&yoji;</misc>

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<misc>&leg;</misc>

not idiomatic yoji jukugo

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<misc>&yoji;</misc>

Kanji Haitani list

Adding yoji tagAdding yoji tag
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<misc>&yoji;</misc>

Entry created

sens on sense 2 makes sense though

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<misc>&sens;</misc>

Splitting on source language.
Don't need to tag it as sens if it's derog. Not sure it's considered slang either.

@@ -11 +10,0 @@
-<misc>&sens;</misc>
@@ -17,6 +15,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<lsource xml:lang="kor">jeon</lsource>
-<gloss>jeon (Korean currency unit; 1/100 of a won)</gloss>
-<gloss>chŏn</gloss>

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeon

@@ -21 +21,2 @@
-<gloss>Korean currency unit (1/100 of a won)</gloss>
+<gloss>jeon (Korean currency unit; 1/100 of a won)</gloss>
+<gloss>chŏn</gloss>

@@ -11,0 +11,1 @@
+<misc>&sens;</misc>

https://rekihaku.repo.nii.ac.jp/?
action=pages_view_main&active_action=repository_view_main_item_detail&item_id=1192&item_no=1&page_id=13&block_id=41
"Katsu Kaishu sought to make use of vassals outside of the domain and adopted a method whereby he selected the most 
talented among those who had surrendered at Hakodate and either sent them to serve under the Meiji government or 
dispatched them to other feudal domains. Examples of these men who were dispatched to other domains to provide 
instruction in education and military affairs are to be found in the well-known “Okashinin”, or “loaned persons” who 
went to work in the various domains, including Wakayama, Tsuyama, Nagoya and Fukui. These Okashinin took up their new 
roles by either one of two methods: they were either sent to domains directly by the Shizuoka domain upon their return 
home, or they had been sent to the various domains to serve their period of confinement and were subsequently employed 
locally."
https://ir.library.osaka-u.ac.jp/repo/ouka/all/47108/20772_要旨.pdf
第４章「静岡藩の御貸人」、および第５章「箱館戦争降伏人と静岡藩」は、幕府が培い蓄積してきた能力の高さ・
豊富さが、藩士を、降伏人であるかどうかに関わりなく、御貸人として他藩や他地域に派遣することによって、人的
交流や「知識の共有化」を実現したことを明らかにした。

Nor is 貸人...
there's some evidence of the term (some more reuslts for お貸人 also) but it seems extremely obscure.

G n-grams: No matches

This isn't in any of my refs.

gloss can maybe be improved

@@ -13 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>exported teachers during Meiji period</gloss>
+<misc>&hist;</misc>
+<gloss>exported teachers (during Meiji period)</gloss>

Entry created

I think split apart is better

@@ -12,2 +12,7 @@
-<gloss>Kenmu era (of unified Japan) (1334.1.29-1336.2.29)</gloss>
-<gloss>Kenmu era (of the Northern Court) (1336.2.29-1338.8.28)</gloss>
+<misc>&hist;</misc>
+<gloss>Kenmu era (of unified Japan; 1334.1.29-1336.2.29)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&hist;</misc>
+<gloss>Kenmu era (of the Northern Court; 1336.2.29-1338.8.28)</gloss>

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>Kenmu era (of unified Japan) (1334.1.29-1336.2.29), Kenmu era (of the Northern Court) (1336.2.29-1338.8.28)</gloss>
+<gloss>Kenmu era (of unified Japan) (1334.1.29-1336.2.29)</gloss>
+<gloss>Kenmu era (of the Northern Court) (1336.2.29-1338.8.28)</gloss>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Kemmu era (of unified Japan) (1334.1.29-1336.2.29), Kemmu era (of the Northern Court) (1336.2.29-1338.8.28)</gloss>
+<gloss>Kenmu era (of unified Japan) (1334.1.29-1336.2.29), Kenmu era (of the Northern Court) (1336.2.29-1338.8.28)</gloss>

Entry created

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>Liang dynasty (China, 502-557)</gloss>
+<misc>&hist;</misc>
+<gloss>Liang dynasty (of China; 502-557)</gloss>

wiki koj daijs

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Liang Dynasty (of China)</gloss>
+<gloss>Liang dynasty (China, 502-557)</gloss>

Entry created

My bad.

gg5, daij
支配下	        220402	  
支配下に	        144328	  
支配下の	        22091	    
支配下にある	19280

It is a noun.

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -12 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>under control (e.g. of territory)</gloss>
+<gloss>under the control (of)</gloss>
+<gloss>under the dominion (of)</gloss>

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

Entry created

gg5

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>gold (first-place) prize</gloss>
+<gloss>gold prize</gloss>
+<gloss>first-place prize</gloss>

Entry created

I like "The Korean Question".

I don't think "policy" is quite right. koj says "政変", daijr "論", daijs "対朝鮮強硬論", nikk "論"
enwiki calls it a "debate"
google search for "seikanron" bring up words like debate and "The Korean Question".

@@ -12 +12,3 @@
-<gloss>policy of conquering Korea by military force</gloss>
+<misc>&hist;</misc>
+<gloss>Seikanron</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">1873 political debate on whether Korea should be conquered by military force</gloss>

Entry created

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>bathroom with a large bath (in a hotel, at a hot spring resort, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>bathroom with a large bath (in a hotel, hot spring resort, etc.)</gloss>

OK

wiki
大浴場（だいよくじょう）は、浴場の一種であるが、特にその浴室が広く大人数で同時に利用可能な場合にこの名称が用いられることがある。
... 主に温泉地などにある規模の大きいホテルや、日帰り入浴施設で用いられる名称である。

google images are mostly hits for hotels. I wouldn't call a bath at a hotel a "public bath" because it's not open to the 
public, only to the guests of the hotel. That said, many Japanese hotels do: 
https://www.keioprelia.co.jp/kyoto/en/bath/
Public Bath
A moment of pure relaxation. Soak in a rejuvenating bath overlooking our inner garden.
https://www.celestinehotels.jp/kyoto-gion/eng/facility/bath/
"The large public bath has a modern Japanese atmosphere and looks out to the “Ancient Garden”. It is a truly relaxing 
area available exclusively to hotel guests."
https://www.princehotels.com/furano/facilities/public-bath/
Facilities
 Public Bath
These baths are exclusively for hotel guests. Take a moment to relax and unwind after your travels.

No matter how hard I try though, I'm not finding any results on Google for non-Japanese hotels saying they have "public 
baths".
(search term: public bath hotel -japan -kyoto -co.jp -or.jp -お風呂 -大浴場)

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>large public bath</gloss>
+<gloss>bathroom with a large bath (in a hotel, at a hot spring resort, etc.)</gloss>

Entry created

目黒	1728276

I think we should have entries in jmdict for all the 23 wards of Tokyo. (i'm bringing it up on github)

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -8,0 +10 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>
@@ -13,0 +16,5 @@
+<sense>
+<stagr>めぐろ</stagr>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>Meguro City (special ward of Tokyo)</gloss>
+</sense>

@@ -10,0 +10,4 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>メグロ</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>
+</r_ele>

Entry created

For now
Word isn't obscure, the event is little-
discussed

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<misc>&obsc;</misc>
+<misc>&hist;</misc>

move to enam?
ピルトダウン事件	102

Entry created

dynasty conversion
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>Northern Di people (Zhou-dynasty term for non-ethnic Chinese to the north)</gloss>
+<gloss>Northern Di people (Zhou dynasty term for non-ethnic Chinese to the north)</gloss>

@@ -12,3 +12,2 @@
-<misc>&arch;</misc>
-<misc>&derog;</misc>
-<gloss>Northern Di people</gloss>
+<misc>&hist;</misc>
+<gloss>Northern Di people (Zhou-dynasty term for non-ethnic Chinese to the north)</gloss>
@@ -16 +14,0 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">Zhou dynasty term used by the Chinese to refer to non-ethnic Chinese to the north</gloss>

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">Zhou dynasty term used by the Chinese to refer to non- ethnic Chinese to the north</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">Zhou dynasty term used by the Chinese to refer to non-ethnic Chinese to the north</gloss>

http://blog.kcg.ne.jp/objectbrain/2013/02/08/北狄と北荻/

common because part of きたおぎしま[北荻島].  i don't think it's really legit.  i count 36 google hits, many drawn from edict.  probably not worth recording

@@ -6,4 +5,0 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>北荻</keb>
-<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>

Add spelling 北荻; incorrect but seems pretty common.
(Merge from 2028640)

@@ -5,0 +6,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>北荻</keb>
+<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>
@@ -16 +20 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">Zhou dynasty term used by the Chinese to refer to non-ethnic Chinese to the north</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">Zhou dynasty term used by the Chinese to refer to non- ethnic Chinese to the north</gloss>

OK

koj
https://www.nippon.com/en/features/h00124/
Japan’s 72 Microseasons
In ancient times the Japanese divided their 
year into 24 periods based on classical 
Chinese sources. The natural world comes to 
life in the even more vividly named 72 
subdivisions of the traditional Japanese 
calendar.

I suggest "microseasons" (or micro-seasons)

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<gloss>the 72 'climates' of the year based on the 24 solar seasons further divided into three</gloss>
+<gloss>the 72 microseasons of the year based on the 24 solar seasons further divided into 3</gloss>

Not the usual meaning of "climate" inEnglish.

I said this in the 108 entry too but I don't understand what the single qutotation marks around 'climates' is for

@@ -13,1 +13,1 @@
-<xref type="see">候</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1272680">候・こう</xref>

Not used for  inhabitans of the modern city of Nazareth, I'd wager

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<misc>&hist;</misc>

Entry created

Household word.

simplified a little

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>Great Interregnum (gap between Hohenstaufen and Habsburg rule of the Holy Roman Empire, approx. 1254-1273 CE)</gloss>
+<misc>&hist;</misc>
+<gloss>Great Interregnum (period of the Holy Roman Empire; approx. 1254-1273)</gloss>

Entry created

Wikipedia describes it as "インターネット用語".
I don't think the abbr tag is needed. キリ番 is never written as 切りのいい番号.

@@ -19,2 +19 @@
-<misc>&abbr;</misc>
-<misc>&sl;</misc>
+<misc>&net-sl;</misc>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/キリバン
https://gimon-sukkiri.jp/kiriban/
"もともとは、ホームページの訪問者数がキリの良い数字だった際に使う言葉でした。しかし、近年では、ホームページで訪問者数を数える文化は廃れつつあります。そのため、ホームページにおけるキリ番は死語になりつつあり、現在では、以下のような数字のキリが良いときに使います。SNSのフォロワー数、動画の再生回数、車のメーターの数字、レシートの番号など"
キリ番	799179
切り番	24848
キリバン	87524

I think "satisfying number" works.
Website visitor counters aren't really a thing any more but キリ番 is still very common (hundreds of tweets per day). It's used for all sorts of things.
Pretty slangy.

@@ -11,2 +11 @@
-<reb>キリばん</reb>
-<re_restr>キリ番</re_restr>
+<reb>きりばん</reb>
@@ -15,2 +14,2 @@
-<reb>きりばん</reb>
-<re_restr>切り番</re_restr>
+<reb>キリバン</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>
@@ -20,0 +20 @@
+<misc>&sl;</misc>
@@ -22 +22 @@
-<gloss>good turning point number (10000, 12345 etc., often referring to web site visit counts)</gloss>
+<gloss>satisfying number (e.g. 10000, 12345, 33333; in view counts, odometer readings, video game scores, etc.)</gloss>