G n-grams:
珍矛	35
---
ちんぽこ	10715
チンポコ	7054
ちんぼこ	220
チンボコ	295

I don't know where that kanji came from.

@@ -19,2 +19 @@
-<misc>&col;</misc>
-<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<misc>&chn;</misc>

https://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/word/ちんぼこ/

@@ -4,3 +3,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>珍矛</keb>
-</k_ele>
@@ -9,0 +7,9 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>チンポコ</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ちんぼこ</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>チンボコ</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -11,0 +18 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1008000">チンポ</xref>

Aligning part-of-speech inflection information for auxiliary adjectives

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<pos>&adj-i;</pos>

I'll close this.

It's really sense 1 being used solo.  Lots of terms can be used that way - やっぱり is formally an adverb, but you hear it solo too. I'm not sure it warrants its own sense.

Private LINE conversation:
A: 前みたいな蜘蛛？
B: らしい。

B is in her 60s.

Also used not as a suffix but by itself!

I don't think "programme" is ever used in computing contexts.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2281140">アプリケーションソフトウエア</xref>
@@ -14 +15 @@
-<gloss>application programme</gloss>
+<gloss>application software</gloss>

Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>アプリケーション・プログラム</reb>

daijr

@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1433050">通貨</xref>

daijs

@@ -6,0 +7,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>シュアー</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -8 +11 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
@@ -9,0 +13,2 @@
+<gloss>certain</gloss>
+<gloss>trustworthy</gloss>

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<field>&finc;</field>

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<field>&finc;</field>

Thanks.

@@ -10 +10 @@
-<gloss>Eurobank (bank that accepts deposits and make loans in foreign currencies)</gloss>
+<gloss>Eurobank (bank that accepts deposits and makes loans in foreign currencies)</gloss>

https://financial-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Eurobank
https://www.lexico.com/definition/eurobank

Not Europe specifically.
I note that Oxford has a "European Central Bank" but I'm not seeing that anywhere else.

@@ -9,2 +9,2 @@
-<gloss>European currency bank</gloss>
-<gloss>Eurobank</gloss>
+<field>&finc;</field>
+<gloss>Eurobank (bank that accepts deposits and make loans in foreign currencies)</gloss>

Daijr, GG5, etc.

May as well keep it.

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<gloss>European currency bank</gloss>

Already in JMnedict.

"Europoort (Dutch pronunciation: [ˈøːroːpoːrt], English: Eurogate, also "Europort") is an area of the Port of Rotterdam and the adjoining 
industrial area"
probably not jmdict material?

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<field>&finc;</field>

I'll go for currency.

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1137000">ユーロダラー</xref>

ユーロマネー	1243

https://www.ifinance.ne.jp/glossary/market/mar206.html
but brit says "see ユーロダラー"

Which is it?

@@ -6,0 +7,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ユーロ・マネー</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -9 +12,3 @@
-<gloss>Euromoney</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1136960">ユーロカレンシー</xref>
+<lsource ls_wasei="y">Euro money</lsource>
+<gloss>Eurocurrency</gloss>

gg5

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<field>&anat;</field>

nikk

@@ -10,0 +10,4 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>いんきょう</reb>
+<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>

gg5, prog, wisdom

I don't think all of those glosses are needed.

@@ -21,0 +22 @@
+<gloss>allocation</gloss>
@@ -24,4 +24,0 @@
-<gloss>quota</gloss>
-<gloss>rationing</gloss>
-<gloss>apportionment</gloss>
-<gloss>allocation (risk, resources, etc.)</gloss>

割り振り	110213
割振り	47721
割りふり	1081

Encountered this spelling in the CCs for やはり俺の青春ラブコメはまちがっている。 and ID:INVADED イド：インヴェイデッド.

@@ -10,0 +11,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>割りふり</keb>

Oops.

@@ -25 +25 @@
-<gloss>to have an affect (on)</gloss>
+<gloss>to have an effect (on)</gloss>

gg5, prog, daij

Please provide references when making amendments.

@@ -19,4 +19,7 @@
-<gloss>to influence</gloss>
-<gloss>to exert (exercise) one's (an) influence on</gloss>
-<gloss>to have an effect on</gloss>
-<gloss>to affect</gloss>
+<gloss>to exert (influence)</gloss>
+<gloss>to exercise</gloss>
+<gloss>to cause (e.g. damage)</gloss>
+<gloss>to do (e.g. harm)</gloss>
+<gloss>to bring about (e.g. benefits)</gloss>
+<gloss>to extend</gloss>
+<gloss>to have an affect (on)</gloss>

@@ -19,3 +19,4 @@
-<gloss>to exert</gloss>
-<gloss>to cause</gloss>
-<gloss>to exercise</gloss>
+<gloss>to influence</gloss>
+<gloss>to exert (exercise) one's (an) influence on</gloss>
+<gloss>to have an effect on</gloss>
+<gloss>to affect</gloss>

With 回戦 expanded, I think this can go.

If this is dropped, it may be a good isea to expand the 回戦 entry (1613860). I have proposed some expansions there.

@@ -14,0 +15,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1613860">回戦・かいせん・2</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1613860">回戦・かいせん・2</xref>

Looking at twitter, this doesn't seem more 
common than 8回戦 or 10回戦. So I'm not 
convinced this is more than the sum of its 
parts.

As a non-baseball person I didn't know a regulation game had 9 innings. I'd leave it in.

A term tagged as derogatory should have derogatory glosses (where possible). I think "darkie; golliwog" is fine. The n-word is probably too strong.
I don't think the x-ref to 白んぼ is needed.

@@ -27 +26,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2258930">白んぼ</xref>
@@ -30,0 +30,2 @@
+<gloss>darkie</gloss>
+<gloss>golliwog</gloss>

Well, in the end I guess it's up to you to make an "executive decision" if you think including certain words could hurt the project. We do otoh already 
have a ニガー entry. I agree the n-word doesn't really belong here, it's not half as strong as くろんぼ. But I think including "darkie; golliwog" would 
help. We decided after some debate that [ctr] entries should begin with "counter for..." despite them already having the [ctr] tag. One of the 
arguments was that people don't look too closely at the tags. If we accept that argument here, it could lead a beginner to think this was a useful 
synonym to "黒人", or to somebody called this not realized the negative connotations of the word. (and that's without even getting into all the other 
reasons why we try to match register in the first place, like being helpful to translators, etc.)

I have a hard time imagining anybody accusing us of being racist for accurately translating a word that's used in a racist manner.

Reopen.

In fact I want the n-word, etc. gone immediately. I'll approve and then reopen.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-54107329

Odd, maybe, but this is VERY sensitive topic  in many parts of the Enlish-speaking world. The last thing I want is knee-jerk censorship and pillorying of this whole project because of an attempt to match register. I'm afraid MILF is/was not in the same league as this one.

Yes.

genius; daijr/s: 「…鬼にたとえていう語」

"Conscienceless" is a bit awkward.

@@ -13 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>conscienceless murderer</gloss>
+<gloss>cold-blooded murderer</gloss>
+<gloss>homicidal maniac</gloss>

daijs chujiten

@@ -12,2 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>devilish homicide</gloss>
-<gloss>cutthroat</gloss>
+<gloss>bloodthirsty killer</gloss>
+<gloss>conscienceless murderer</gloss>

gg5, chujiten, prog, wisdom

None of my JEs have "proprietary".

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<gloss>private</gloss>
@@ -17,2 +17,0 @@
-<gloss>private</gloss>
-<gloss>proprietary</gloss>

Bulk update: removing noun POSBulk update: removing noun POS
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -16 +15,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>

sankoku, iwakoku, meikyo, and shinsen have 俗 tags on this sense.

@@ -46,0 +47 @@
+<misc>&col;</misc>

Fine.

koj: 一般には「赤」。鮮やかなあか色に「紅」、黄みがかった深赤色では「朱」も使う。「紅い唇」「朱い印肉」

Meikyo has 朱い as a headword. Koj also mentions it. How about this?
I don't think the archaic sense is needed. It's not in daijr or koj.

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -39 +39 @@
-<s_inf>紅い is esp. for scarlet</s_inf>
+<s_inf>esp. 紅い for scarlet, 朱い for vermilion</s_inf>
@@ -44 +43,0 @@
-<gloss>vermillion</gloss>
@@ -50,5 +48,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
-<misc>&arch;</misc>
-<gloss>beautiful</gloss>

I'd hide the others too.

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -20 +20 @@
-<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

赤い	7585976	95.5%
紅い	318432	4.0% <- daijr
朱い	27551	0.3% <- google e.g. "朱いオレンジ" ~30K
緋い	8789	0.1% <- google e.g. "緋い花" ~100K
赭い	238	0.0%
丹い	158	0.0%

The last two forms point mostly to here.

@@ -24 +24 @@
-<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -28 +28 @@
-<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

@@ -18 +17,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

No, he was responding to my comment about sense 4.
Anyway, I think this looks OK now.

@@ -46,0 +47 @@
+<gloss>from a ... standpoint</gloss>

I suspect Marcus meant sense 3?I'll approve this, and on the basis of sense 4 I'll drop the proposed 的に enttry.

Re dropping the "esp." on sense 4, there's 
actually plenty of twitter results for 僕的な　
e.g. "僕的な考えだけど”　"僕的な解釈”

This entry is becoming quite unwieldy.
I think we can merge senses 4 and 5. The "opinion" glosses are somewhat awkward, in my view. Also, I'm not sure that usage is ever adjectival. Might be better to drop "esp."
I don't think sense 3 should be moved to a separate 的な entry as we'd have to copy over senses 1 and 2 as well.

@@ -26,0 +27,2 @@
+<gloss>-sort of</gloss>
+<gloss>-kind of</gloss>
@@ -33 +35 @@
-<gloss>like</gloss>
+<gloss>(something) like</gloss>
@@ -40,9 +42 @@
-<s_inf>used with pronouns or proper nouns, esp. adverbially as ～には</s_inf>
-<gloss>in one's opinion</gloss>
-<gloss>as one sees it</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&suf;</pos>
-<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
-<misc>&col;</misc>
-<s_inf>used with a wide array of nouns, esp. adverbially as ～に(は)</s_inf>
+<s_inf>after a noun or pronoun, esp. adverbially as ～に(は)</s_inf>
@@ -50,0 +45,3 @@
+<gloss>for</gloss>
+<gloss>from the viewpoint of</gloss>
+<gloss>as far as ... is concerned</gloss>

We have a separate entry for みたいな. Based on that precedent, maybe we could break the third sense into 的な and classify it there.

gg5, prog, wisdom

More glosses.

@@ -18,0 +19,6 @@
+<gloss>appropriate</gloss>
+<gloss>suitable</gloss>
+<gloss>fitting</gloss>
+<gloss>apt</gloss>
+<gloss>proper</gloss>
+<gloss>right</gloss>
@@ -20,2 +25,0 @@
-<gloss>appropriate</gloss>
-<gloss>adequate</gloss>

I believe the definition of "relevance" was a bit irregular here? It seems na-adjectives should usually only use English adjectives in their definitions.

@@ -22 +22 @@
-<gloss>relevance</gloss>
+<gloss>relevant</gloss>

闘争	1352937	99.4%
斗争	6591	0.5%
鬪爭	2006	0.1%

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -16 +16 @@
-<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

@@ -12,0 +13,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>鬪爭</keb>
+<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>

mk

@@ -22,0 +23 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -30,0 +32 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

daij, koj, prog

The kokugos split like this.

@@ -23 +22,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -25,2 +24,2 @@
-<gloss>struggle</gloss>
-<gloss>strife</gloss>
+<gloss>battle</gloss>
+<gloss>combat</gloss>
@@ -32,2 +31,3 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<gloss>labor dispute</gloss>
+<gloss>struggle (for rights, higher wages, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>strife</gloss>
+<gloss>(labor) dispute</gloss>

daij, koj

@@ -16,0 +17,4 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>にょうぜつ</reb>
+<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>

chuujiten; luminous; prog; saito; genius; デイリーコンサイス

A majority of the J-Es (excepting gg5) lead with "talkativeness".

@@ -19,0 +20 @@
+<gloss>talkativeness</gloss>
@@ -22 +22,0 @@
-<gloss>talkativeness</gloss>

GG5 (饒舌/冗舌), 中辞典 (冗舌/饒舌)
饒舌家	562
冗舌家	35

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -19 +19,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>

"dick" is originally a euphemism too - "Ultimately from Dick, pet form of the name Richard. The name Dick came to mean "everyman", whence the word acquired its other meanings." (wiktionary) (though wiktionary also calls "dick" (with the meaning penis) "vulgar")
I've seen ナニ in subtitles to represent quite vulgar words so I think "dick" works ok if it's the last gloss.

@@ -42,0 +43 @@
+<gloss>dick</gloss>

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/thing
"10. (slang) A penis."

I think "dick"/"junk" is too vulgar for what is really a euphemism.

@@ -42,2 +42 @@
-<gloss>dick</gloss>
-<gloss>junk</gloss>
+<gloss>(one's) thing</gloss>

https://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q11187125301
ナニとは何ですか？下ネタなのは雰囲気で分かるのですが、意味がわかりません。
...
「ナニ」とか「アレ」は、そのときの文脈で判断するしかありません
「俺のナニを」ならチンコのことでしょうし、「ナニをしてるときに」なら自慰行為、「彼女とナニをしてたら」ならセックスのことでしょう
https://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q10190001520
性的な意味で「ナニ」とはどういう意味なのですか？？
...
おちん〇んのことです
...
性器の事だと思いますよ
https://oshiete.goo.ne.jp/qa/10272176.html
少し下品な話になってしまいますが、たまに男性器を「ナニ」と呼ぶことがあると思います。

https://dic.pixiv.net/a/ナニ
ナニ
「ナニ」とは・・・なんだろうね。
(もしかして)→男性器・セックス

eij
junk: 8. 〈米俗〉あそこ、ナニ◆性器（主に男性器）を指す。

I've noticed that ナニ (always in katakana) is frequently used in Japanese subtitles of English-language movies/TV shows with the meaning "penis". I asked a native speaker if this is really an established expression (when I first saw it) and they commented it's at least commonly used like this in subtitles. 

It's really a subsense of sense 2 but it seems common enough to get its own sense. "masturbation"/"to have sex" don't seem quite as common (and I haven't encountered the word used like that in the wild/in Jp subtitles either)

I considered creating a separate kana-only entry for ナニ but it can be and is of course used with other senses of 何 too and I wouldn't want to direct users looking up the more innocuous use to the wrong entry.

@@ -14,0 +15,4 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ナニ</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>
@@ -32,0 +37,9 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&col;</misc>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<s_inf>esp. ナニ</s_inf>
+<gloss>penis</gloss>
+<gloss>dick</gloss>
+<gloss>junk</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
@@ -47,0 +61 @@
+<gloss>come on!</gloss>

@@ -30 +30 @@
-<gloss>what'-s-her-name</gloss>
+<gloss>what's-her-name</gloss>

Bulk update n-adv to n,adv
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -28 +28 @@
-<pos>&n-adv;</pos>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>

gg5, prog
daijs: 副詞的にも用いる
meikyo: 名・副

I don't think it's adj-no any more than 私, 彼, みんな, etc. are.

@@ -27,0 +28 @@
+<pos>&n-adv;</pos>
@@ -29 +30,2 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<gloss>each (person)</gloss>
+<gloss>individually</gloss>
@@ -31 +32,0 @@
-<gloss>each</gloss>
@@ -32,0 +34 @@
+<gloss>in turn</gloss>

一人一人	1754811
一人一人は	19197
一人一人が	420582
一人一人の	666543

Remnants of the scrapings from IPADIC. I'd suggest this.

@@ -28,2 +28,2 @@
-<pos>&n-t;</pos>
-<pos>&suf;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

temporal noun? suffix?

Thanks Stuart!

OK

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/トーナメント方式

As was pointed out in the comments below, this isn't a counter. It refers to the event itself. It's not used for counting rounds, legs, etc.
There's also a second usage. On the トーナメント方式 wiki article, 4回戦 means "fourth-round match". Contrast with sense 1, where 4回戦 (in boxing) means "4-round bout".

@@ -15,2 +15,2 @@
-<pos>&ctr;</pos>
-<gloss>counter for rounds, innings, legs, etc. in sporting events</gloss>
+<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
+<gloss>event with ... rounds, innings, legs, etc.</gloss>
@@ -20 +20 @@
-<gloss>event with ... rounds, innings, legs, etc.</gloss>
+<gloss>nth-round match (in a knockout tournament)</gloss>

リーダーズ+プラス (uses it for the EJ entries for "legs" and "rounds".

Suggested broadening as it's used in baseball, relay races, etc. 
I approved the 九回戦 can probably be dropped.

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>counter for numbering the rounds in a tournament</gloss>
+<gloss>counter for rounds, innings, legs, etc. in sporting events</gloss>
@@ -20 +20 @@
-<gloss>fight with ... rounds (e.g. boxing)</gloss>
+<gloss>event with ... rounds, innings, legs, etc.</gloss>

Fine line.

In boxing etc., "12回戦" does not mean (as the current gloss suggests) "12th round", but rather "12-round fight."

@@ -17,0 +18,4 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
+<gloss>fight with ... rounds (e.g. boxing)</gloss>
+</sense>

JEs - all have medical glosses.

Curiously the only Tanaka example is for a traffic stricture.

gg5, prog

I think it's clearer to split off the medical glosses into a separate sense.

@@ -15,0 +16,6 @@
+<gloss>contraction</gloss>
+<gloss>narrowing</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<field>&med;</field>
@@ -18 +23,0 @@
-<gloss>contraction</gloss>

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -15 +15,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>

aligning w Robin's edit to 男殺し

@@ -20,2 +20,3 @@
-<gloss>murder of women</gloss>
-<gloss>murderer of women</gloss>
+<gloss>murder of a woman</gloss>
+<gloss>murderer of a woman</gloss>
+<gloss>femicide</gloss>

... but in nikk.

@@ -9,0 +10,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>おんなころし</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -16,0 +20 @@
+<gloss>murder of women</gloss>
@@ -19,4 +22,0 @@
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>murder of women</gloss>
-</sense>

senses 2 and 3 aren't in daijs...

@@ -12,2 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>lady-killer (i.e. a man who is popular with women)</gloss>
-<gloss>knocking a woman dead (with sex appeal)</gloss>
+<gloss>ladykiller</gloss>
+<gloss>ladies' man</gloss>

https://note.com/prof_nemuro/n/nbceab6bacc54
"メキシコで蔓延しているのはフェミサイド（女殺し）ではなく男殺し"
https://estar.jp/novels/25542098
"男殺しの狼女｜ホラー小説"
https://movies.yahoo.co.jp/movie/143056/schedule/
"やわ肌無宿　男殺し女殺し (1969)"

I don't think arch is correct, it's just a slightly unusual/literal way of phrasing it.

@@ -22 +21,0 @@
-<misc>&arch;</misc>

I see no reason not to use the singular "man" for sense 2.
Given that none of the refs besides nikk even mention this meaning, I think it needs to be marked as arch/obs/obsc. I don't know which is most appropriate.

@@ -22,2 +22,3 @@
-<gloss>murder of men</gloss>
-<gloss>murderer of men</gloss>
+<misc>&arch;</misc>
+<gloss>murder of a man</gloss>
+<gloss>murderer of a man</gloss>

nikk
① 男を殺害すること。⇔女殺し。
I included "murderer" despite nikk not explicitly mentioning "また、その人" as they do in their 女殺し entry

@@ -19,0 +20,5 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>murder of men</gloss>
+<gloss>murderer of men</gloss>
+</sense>

Best drop it.

@@ -27 +26,0 @@
-<misc>&arch;</misc>

"good" isn't just arch, it's modern slang also. heard said by a young woman in the drama おカネの切れ目が恋のはじまり

* Link to 良し, as this is an inflected version.
* Add [arch], as this is really old-fashioned, mostly found 
in set phrases.

@@ -26,0 +26,3 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1394280">良し</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1394280">良し</xref>
+<misc>&arch;</misc>

Close it for now.

The youtube clip wouldn't run.
https://tachiai.org/2019/10/02/whats-all-the-commotion-part-2-matchmaking/ - "If the gyoji deems the bout to be properly started, he will shout out hakkeyoi. Experienced rikishi who are in doubt if the situation is matta or not (e.g. if the opponent is not properly engaging), will listen for that “hakkeyoi” for a confirmation that they should not let down their guards."   and later  "If the rikishi go into a stalemate – which usually happens in a yotsu battle, as pushing-thrusting bouts tend to quickly resolve one way or the other, the gyoji will stop the “nokotta” and instead urge them to renew action, by shouting “hakkeyoi” again."

So according to the tachiai.org page it's used to get them going again when they stop AND at the start to get them moving in the first place. 
I really don't want to stray far from what all the references are saying. Maybe the extension to the note is enough.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<s_inf>cried by the ring referee to wrestlers who are motionless</s_inf>
+<s_inf>cried by the ring referee at the start of a match, and to wrestlers who are motionless</s_inf>

https://youtu.be/cxolLdAPeyI

I just picked a random Sumo match to demonstrate that this definition is 
fundamentally inadequate.  It really doesn’t matter which match you observe, 
the Gyoji will shout はっけよい the instant the 立ち合い is successful.  In the 
initial usage, it has nothing to do with the rikishi becoming motionless.  If you 
watch this video, or any one of thousands of others, the minute the 
combatants make contact without triggering a false start, the Gyoji belts it out.

OK

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<s_inf>poss. from 八卦よい; cried by the ring referee to wrestlers who are motionless</s_inf>
+<s_inf>cried by the ring referee to wrestlers who are motionless</s_inf>

"hakkeyoi" gets way more googits.
daijs says 《「八卦 (はっけ) よい」の意か》 with a か at the end.
(I personally don't think we need to add etym in cases like these)

@@ -13,2 +13,2 @@
-<s_inf>from 八卦よい</s_inf>
-<gloss>hakke yoi! (cry of the ring referee to wrestlers who are motionless)</gloss>
+<s_inf>poss. from 八卦よい; cried by the ring referee to wrestlers who are motionless</s_inf>
+<gloss>hakkeyoi!</gloss>

OK

The big difference between "watashiteki" and "shiteki" is that "watashiteki" always refers to the speaker, while "shiteki" can refer to 
somebody else. Might this be a good way of demonstrating this? or "personal (e.g. opinion); my"

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<gloss>personal (e.g. opinion)</gloss>
+<gloss>my personal (e.g. opinion)</gloss>

I think so.

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<misc>&col;</misc>

Should this be tagged as col?

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<s_inf>often わたし的には</s_inf>
+<s_inf>oft. as わたし的には</s_inf>

GG5, 中辞典

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>Vatican</gloss>

wiki
https://www.dictionary.com/browse/curia-romana

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>Curia Romana</gloss>

Entry created

(based on what's in meaning-dictionary.com )

@@ -47,0 +48 @@
+<s_inf>usu. 手を挙げる</s_inf>

Heard this used to indicate a company was going to submit a proposal for a project announced by a local government.
Not in daij, but here:
https://meaning-
dictionary.com/%E3%80%8C%E6%89%8B%E3%82%92%E6%8C%99%E3%81%92%E3%82%8B%E3%80%8D%E3%81%A8%E3%80%8C%E6%89%8B%E3%82%92%E4%B8%8A%E3%81%92%E3%82%8B%E3%80%8
D%E3%81%AE%E9%81%95%E3%81%84%E3%81%A8%E3%81%AF%EF%BC%9F/#toc5
"「あのプロジェクトへの参加に手を挙げる企業は数多いだろう」
多数の企業が参加して行われるような大型のプロジェクトを対象として使っている例です。

ここでの「手を挙げる」は、それに「参加する」と表現しています。

尚、あくまで「参加するという意志の表明」なので、その後で思い直し、やはり参加は取り止めるということもあるかも知れません。"

@@ -20 +20 @@
-<gloss>to raise one's hand or hands</gloss>
+<gloss>to raise one's hand</gloss>
@@ -24,0 +25 @@
+<misc>&id;</misc>
@@ -32 +33 @@
-<gloss>to raise a hand to someone (as a threat to strike)</gloss>
+<gloss>to raise one's hand to someone (as a threat to strike)</gloss>
@@ -37,0 +39 @@
+<misc>&id;</misc>
@@ -38,0 +41 @@
+<gloss>to become better (at something)</gloss>
@@ -40,0 +44,9 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
+<misc>&id;</misc>
+<gloss>to throw one's hat in the ring</gloss>
+<gloss>to volunteer</gloss>
+<gloss>to indicate one intends to participate</gloss>
+<gloss>to raise one's hand</gloss>
+</sense>

Entry created

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1009470">ならば</xref>

Entry created

スタンドアローン	25734
スタンドアロン	64478
--
スタンドアロンの	10606

@@ -4,0 +5,3 @@
+<reb>スタンドアロン</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -7,3 +9,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>スタンドアロン</reb>
-</r_ele>
@@ -11,2 +11 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<pos>&adj-f;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>スタンドアロン</reb>
@@ -12,0 +15,1 @@
+<gloss>stand-alone</gloss>

Entry created

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Killer_application

I agree, but I'm not sure that makes it a computing term. Wikipedia says "In marketing terminology, a killer application ..."

I think it's rather locked into computing contexts.

Should this be considered a computing term? It's related to computing but I wouldn't say it's computing terminology.

キラーコンテンツ	15016

キラーアプリケーション	4887

wiki daijs nipp ascii

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2846756">キラーコンテンツ</xref>
@@ -13 +14,2 @@
-<gloss>"killer" application</gloss>
+<gloss>killer application</gloss>
+<gloss>killer app</gloss>

余っ程	820
よっぽど	1546572

@@ -6 +6 @@
-<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

As I wrote earlier, I think that applies to よほどのこと. I don't think it belongs here.

@@ -19 +19 @@
-<gloss>very (enough to explain something else happening)</gloss>
+<gloss>very</gloss>

I think this is what was proposed?

@@ -19 +19 @@
-<gloss>very</gloss>
+<gloss>very (enough to explain something else happening)</gloss>

OK. I've aligned 余程.

gg5, prog, daij

よほど doesn't take on a new meaning when it's used adjectivally as よほどの, so I don't think a new sense is needed. "Unusual" and "extraordinary" are quite context-specific translations. It really just means "considerable/great".
I don't think we need a よほどのこと entry. It's just one of many よほどの〜 examples.
Added glosses. Not a noun.

@@ -14 +13,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -16 +15,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1605980">余程・よほど・1</xref>
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1605980">よほど・1</xref>
@@ -21,0 +22 @@
+<gloss>considerably</gloss>
@@ -27 +28,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1605980">余程・よほど・2</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1605980">よほど・2</xref>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -28,0 +31,2 @@
+<gloss>almost</gloss>
+<gloss>very nearly</gloss>

A week on. I'll close.

OED, https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/gamut

"gamut" has other meanings in English, which I think are more common. I don't think it should be solo as the first gloss here.

@@ -13 +12,0 @@
-<gloss>gamut</gloss>

enwiki
In color reproduction, including computer graphics and photography, the gamut, or color gamut, is a certain complete subset of colors.

Most commonly just "gamut" in printing, etc. I think.
(see pantone's "extended gamut" for example)

@@ -12,0 +13,2 @@
+<gloss>gamut</gloss>
+<gloss>color gamut</gloss>
@@ -14 +15,0 @@
-<gloss>color gamut</gloss>

G n-grams:
色域	20238
ガモット	  850
ガマット	  601
ギャマ	No matches

Just realised there's no reason to have ガモット and ガマット as separate entries.

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ガマット</reb>

Seems like it.

typo?

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>xieszhi (mythical Chinese beast, symbol of justice and law)</gloss>
+<gloss>xiezhi (mythical Chinese beast, symbol of justice and law)</gloss>

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xiezhi
https://kotobank.jp/word/獬豸-1286621

With the additions just made to the 的 entry, I think this is redundant.

The full dictionary is called 三省堂国語辞典・第七版 (https://dictionary.sanseido-publ.co.jp/dict/ssd13926).
I access mine through the Monokakido dictionary app. It's a modern JP dictionary similar to Shinmeikai or Meikyou, but it tends to 
have slang and modern collocations that other dictionaries sometimes omit.

If we include the relevant senses under 的, then indeed this is unnecessary. My only reasoning for making a separate entry for this 
was because the "-wise; in terms of" sense is strictly adverbial with に or には. If we clarify that with a comment in a sense under 
的, then that might be fine. I feel it is important to be explicit about this sense because it doesn't really derive nicely from "-
ic/-ive/-al" or "-like", but is used frequently in spoken Japanese.

Which "Sanseido kokugo"? It's not in 大辞林.

I am afraid I'm not sure this entry is needed or appropriate. It all hinges on whether XX的に can't really be understood from the straight 的 entry. Exceptions can be set up as their own entries. We have 私的 as an entry and can perhaps have 気持ち的に too - GG5 has it as a sub-entry.

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<gloss>-ical</gloss>
+<gloss>-ically</gloss>

Sanseido Kokugo has sense 2 defined as such:
〔俗〕〔「－に（は）」の形で〕…として。「わたし的には納得できない」(It's hard for me to accept it / agree)「テレビ的には、悪役がいたほうがいい」(In terms of television, it's better if there's an antagonist)

Another example from the internet:
"他のユーザーさんで、ディーゼルでリッター15キロも届かない方がいらして、私には、この情報が信じられないです。乗り方の問題?もしくは車的にハズレ?1度販売店に相談されては?と思いました。".
This "車的にハズレ" should be interpreted as "was it an unlucky draw car-wise?"

I felt this deserved its own entry to encompass the slang meaning of 的に, which is hard to derive from the glosses "-like; kind of; sort of;" in the definition for 的.
The first sense is meant as a fallback for the non-slang usage of 的に as an adverbial suffix, which is a direct extension of the official use of 的.
The second sense is meant to cover things like 気持ち的に, 私的に, 仕事的に, テレビ的に, 車的に etc.

daijs: 女性を夢中にさせる魅力的な男性。女殺し。
レディーキラー	875
女殺し	        9874

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1762150">女殺し・1</xref>

daijs
レディーキラー	875
レディキラー	800

Not established terms in English, so warrants an explanatory gloss.

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<gloss g_type="expl">murder of each other's targets by co-conspirators</gloss>

GG5

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>murder exhchange</gloss>
+<gloss>murder exchange</gloss>

交換殺人	6084

Strangers on a train-type of scenario. "tvtropes" actually calls their entry on this trope "Strangers on a Train"-plot murder
https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/StrangersOnATrainPlotMurder
a reference to the movie in the gloss might actually be appropriate / helpful
(daijs says: "推理小説の題材となることが多い。"

Looks OK.

daijs: "推理小説などで..."

I intended for it to be a clarification that this is not really a real-world occurrence, but a thing that appears in literature ("i.e." 
signaling a "complete or near-complete set" rather than an example of many, as "e.g." suggests). But maybe "e.g." would be a better match 
for daijs' "など".
(and maybe this usage of i.e. is off, I can't tell)

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>locked-room murder (i.e. in murder mystery fiction)</gloss>
+<gloss>locked-room murder (e.g. in murder mystery fiction)</gloss>

Is this a correct use of "i.e."? I thought it was just used to restate something in other words.

daijs eij wiki
密室殺人	37487

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/曙色

I think this is OK. A bit lteral, but it translates the full term.
I think it's appropriate that we have these "official" names.

enwiki also says "also known as the Republic of Ireland"

Either way is fine by me, but 5k in the 
ngrams is quite a lot.

jwiki: 日本語では「アイルランド」と「アイルランド共和国」の両方が使われており、日本国外務省は公式名称である前者を用いている

Although "Republic of Ireland" is often used to distinguish the country from the island, the official name of the country is just "Ireland".
Not sure this entry is needed.

adding official country names based on this list:
https://www.mofa.go.jp/mofaj/area/index.html
(アイルランド is actually one of few listed by their short-hand name but:

アイルランド共和国	5476

self-approving

GG5, Daijr. Eijiro

@@ -11,0 +12,2 @@
+<gloss>random masonry</gloss>
+<gloss>uneven stonework</gloss>

daijr, daijs https://kotobank.jp/word/乱積み-656841
http://www.aisf.or.jp/~jaanus/deta/r/ransekizumi.htm

I think that helps.

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>Western-style tattoo chosen for self-expression (often small)</gloss>

https://www.usfca.edu/center-asia-pacific/perspectives/v16n1/skutlin

I know we tend to imply a Japanese perspective for our entries (especially when 「国」 is involved), but I 
think more context would help here. "Non-traditional" can mean many things and presumes a specific tradition.

Maybe "[expl] smaller Western-style tattoo chosen for self-expression (avoiding the stigma around irezumi)" or 
simply " (as opposed to irezumi)", with an x-ref.

ファッションタトゥー	910
https://neutmagazine.com/tattoo_with_no_roots
"近頃は、若者の間でファッション感覚で入れる刺青が流行っているため、気軽に入れる人が多い。通称「ファッション・タトゥー」。そんな刺青のポピュラー化
は刺青への冒涜だと、彫りよし氏は言う。...
しかし、彫りよし氏の言う通り「ファッション・タトゥー」は「刺青」への冒涜なのだろうか？日本の「伝統的な刺青」と「ファッション・タトゥー」は全く社会
的背景が異なるため、比較することはできないと考えることもできる。"
https://www.timeout.jp/tokyo/ja/ニュース/大手スーパー銭%
E6%B9%AF-
%E3%81%BF%E3%81%AA%E3%81%A8%E3%81%BF%E3%82%89%E3%81%84%E3%81%AE%E4%B8%87%E8%91%89%E5%80%B6%E6%A5%BD%E9%83%A8%E3%81%8C%E3%82%BF%E3%83%
88%E3%82%A5%E3%83%BCok%E3%81%AB-012420
"「若い世代を中心としたファッションタトゥーの容認や、外国人観光客のアイデンティティーとして、タトゥーへの理解が日本社会にも求められるようになっ
た」と述べ、施設の入り口に入場客へ向けた案内看板を掲示。"

as opposed to irezumi

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<gloss>immutable law (usu. the Meiji constitution)</gloss>
+<gloss>immutable law (esp. the Meiji constitution)</gloss>

OK

Yes, it refers to the constitution itself. But having "Meiji constitution" as a gloss is not in line with our usual style (see 百獣の王, 百薬の長, ほの字).
I don't think it necessarily has to refer to the Meiji constitution, hence the "usu."

@@ -15,2 +15,2 @@
-<gloss>Meiji constitution</gloss>
-<gloss g_type="lit">immutable law</gloss>
+<gloss>immutable law (usu. the Meiji constitution)</gloss>
+<gloss>indestructible canon</gloss>

looking at daij & nikk, they say this is a euphemism FOR the constitution, not that it's used IN the constitution.
daijr alone has a literal sense: ２ 長い間改定されていない、重要な法律や規則。

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2100080">大日本帝国憲法</xref>
@@ -14,2 +15,2 @@
-<gloss>immutable fundamental law</gloss>
-<gloss>indestructible canon</gloss>
+<gloss>Meiji constitution</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="lit">immutable law</gloss>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/ゴリウォーグ
ゴリウォグ	420 <- in RP
ゴリウォーグ	2399

In things like ゴリウォーグのケークウォーク too.

koj, nikk, gg5

@@ -13 +13,6 @@
-<gloss>stacking pattern, stowage</gloss>
+<gloss>stacking pattern</gloss>
+<gloss>stowage</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>piling worker</gloss>

GG5, Eijiro, RP, 研究社ビジネス英和辞典

Seems fine to me.

jitsuyo: "現物の写真ではなく、対象を模して描かれたイラストや、対象と類似点・共通点を持つ他の個体の写真などを指す場合が多い。[...] 広告やパンフレットといった商業的媒体においては、商品やサービス、あるいは使用例などを示すためにイメージ画像（イメージ写真）が掲載されることがある。購入意欲を刺激するために、現実よりも理想を色濃く反映した写真が使用される場合もある。"
https://news.yahoo.co.jp/articles/78d6c4833b609dac3e07e8dadb69f14333d33e02

Jitsuyo doesn't say it's not a photo, only that it often refers to images that aren't photos of the real thing. It gives photos used in advertising as examples of イメージ画像.
There might be two senses here but I don't think it refers specifically to image *files*. In the article above, the イメージ画像 are just Google image results. I think イメージ画像 are always viewed via a digital medium, though. A real-life painting or drawing wouldn't be an イメージ画像 (unless it was scanned).
How about this?

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<gloss>image (used to explain or demonstrate something)</gloss>
@@ -19 +20 @@
-<gloss>image file</gloss>
+<gloss>(digital) image</gloss>

I think those examples you showed were of イメージ as in computer image, a different sense of イメージ. Maybe this should be 2 senses? jitsuyo 
states it's NOT a photo and google image search mostly agrees.

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<gloss>image (that is drawn or photographed)</gloss>
@@ -16,0 +16,5 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<field>&comp;</field>
+<gloss>image file</gloss>
+</sense>

https://www.antenna.co.jp/sbc/ooxml/osdc-tec-doc-webpage/index.html
https://support.lenovo.com/co/ja/solutions/ht105315
https://support.justsystems.com/faq/1032/app/servlet/qadoc?QID=005189

I think this refers to any physically or digitally produced image (as opposed to a mental image, which is the only meaning the dictionaries have for "イメージ").
It's often an image used to explain or demonstrate something, but not necessarily (see the links above).

@@ -11,0 +12,2 @@
+<gloss>image (that is drawn or photographed)</gloss>
+<gloss>illustration</gloss>
@@ -13,2 +14,0 @@
-<gloss>illustrative example</gloss>
-<gloss>illustration</gloss>

OK. I'm still not sure "artist's impression" works that well, but it's now #4 so it's less of an issue.

"「ありがとうございます。」が省略されて「あざます。」になり、さらに略されて「あざ。」になりました。
「。」を「まる」と言葉にして読むことが流行っていたので、繋げて読んで「あざまる」と居合われるようになりますた。"

Not really an abbreviation. The る comes from 。 I don't think the x-ref is needed.

@@ -9,2 +8,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2120480">あざっす</xref>
-<misc>&abbr;</misc>

Reviving.

I'm diverting this to the あざーっす, etc. entry.

https://www.tutitatu.com/「あざまる」の使い方や意味、例文や類義語を徹/

Just saw someone using this on LINE

@@ -1,3 +1,2 @@
-<ent_seq>5742572</ent_seq>
-<ent_corp>jmnedict</ent_corp>
+<ent_corp>jmdict</ent_corp>

ＫＯＤ追加語彙: 【土木】 〔石垣の積み方の 1 つ〕 a method of building castle walls in which large uncut stones are placed on top of each other without mortar and with the smallest surface of each stone facing outwards.
Daijr: 石垣の積み方の一。奥行の深い石を用い、その小口を正面に出し、奥に深く石が入るように積むこと。

Hope this works.

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>burdock piling (construction technique)</gloss>
+<gloss>stone wall construction technique, with smallest stone surfaces facing outwards</gloss>
+<gloss>burdock piling</gloss>

daijr https://kotobank.jp/word/牛蒡積み-269157
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burdock_piling

Our other XX弁 entries don't have that.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Tama dialect (of Japanese)</gloss>
+<gloss>Tama dialect</gloss>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/多摩弁

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/クラウドファンディング
https://note.com/yoshiaki4720/n/na47909a91a6c

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/マイティ・ソー
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/ソー

No idea what "Thaw" was referring to.

@@ -8,2 +8,2 @@
-<misc>&unclass;</misc>
-<gloss>Thaw</gloss>
+<misc>&person;</misc>
+<gloss>Thor (Marvel Comics superhero)</gloss>

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>
@@ -8,2 +9,2 @@
-<misc>&person;</misc>
-<gloss>Thor (god)</gloss>
+<misc>&dei;</misc>
+<gloss>Thor</gloss>

Dropping sense 2. I can't find a source.

@@ -10,5 +9,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<misc>&place;</misc>
-<gloss>El Tor (Arab Union)</gloss>
-<gloss>Towle</gloss>

Not splitting at present.
I hope to get tags for deities and mythological beings, but the "(god)" with help us track these down.

gg5, daijr

Not sure what tag to use. Is a god a person? Or should it go in the main dictionary?
Is there a source for "El Tor"? Where did "Towle" come from?
By the way, are we splitting entries in jmnedict based on the source word (as in the main dictionary)?

@@ -7,0 +8,4 @@
+<misc>&person;</misc>
+<gloss>Thor (god)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>

@@ -9 +9 @@
-<gloss>Europoort Rotterdam, Holland)</gloss>
+<gloss>Europoort (Rotterdam, Holland)</gloss>

@@ -9 +9,2 @@
-<gloss>Europoort</gloss>
+<gloss>Europoort Rotterdam, Holland)</gloss>
+<gloss>Europort</gloss>

Adding spec1
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

Ancient X.25 network. Now a company name.

@@ -1,3 +1,2 @@
-<ent_seq>1137010</ent_seq>
-<ent_corp>jmdict</ent_corp>
+<ent_corp>jmnedict</ent_corp>
@@ -8 +7 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&company;</misc>

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euronet
this is in ASCII, but in English, I'm not finding a lot of information about this.