Dutch nouns, unlike German, do not start with a capital letter.

@@ -30 +30 @@
-<lsource xml:lang="dut">Kop</lsource>
+<lsource xml:lang="dut">kop</lsource>

https://sudare10.gokenin.com/room/mein/mein-top.html
一組の「カルタ」は４種の紋標（スーツ）と１２の位（ランク）から成り、計４８枚です。紋標は、棍棒（パウ又はハウ）、剣（イス）、貨幣（オウル）、聖杯（コップ又はコツフ）の４種。

https://japanplayingcardmuseum.com/1-1-1-3-analyzing-inkstonebox-printingblock/
天正カルタの四紋標
（右よりハウ、イス、 コツフ、ヲゝル）
(quoting from the mid-Edo 歓遊桑話)

https://japanplayingcardmuseum.com/3-1-4-3-eawasecarta-fourcardstype-suitmarks/
また、「二」や「三」が紋標だとするなら、「ハウ」「イス」「コツフ」「オウル」の違いは何と呼ぶのか。

in the 1959 book 古典日本文学全集: 近松門左衞門集 on google books also: 
...それの少し簡略になって、オウル、コツフ、イス、ハウの四種十二枚、合わせて四十八枚を弄ぶようになって...

a little obscure. [rk] candidate perhaps.

@@ -21,0 +22,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>コツフ</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -22,0 +26 @@
+<stagr>コップ</stagr>

洋杯	462
洋盃	277
骨杯	No matches
コップ	1441879

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -8,0 +10 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -11,0 +14,2 @@
+<ke_inf>&ateji;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cups_(suit)
https://l-pollett.tripod.com/cards9.htm
https://www.kobecitymuseum.jp/collection/detail?heritage=365121
"現在のトランプに近くパオ（棍棒）、コップ（聖杯）、オウル（貨幣）、エスパーダ（剣）という4種の紋標に ..."
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/うんすんカルタ
スートはパオ・ハウまたは花（棍棒）、イスまたは剣（刀剣）、コツまたはコップ（聖杯）、オウル・オウロ[2]またはオリ（金貨）、グルまたはクル[2]（巴
紋）
(sourced to 山口格太郎 著『日本のかるた』保育社、1973年)
http://www.hitoyoshi-hikari.com/history/unsun/unsun.html
パオ（こん棒）、イス（剣）、コツ（聖杯）、オウル（貨幣）、グル（巴紋）の５種類のカードが１５枚ずつの計７５枚

https://books.google.co.jp/books?
id=YGgTAQAAMAAJ&q=%E3%83%91%E3%82%AA+%E3%82%A4%E3%82%B9+%E3%81%8B%E3%82%8B%E3%81%9F&dq=%E3%83%91%E3%82%AA+%E3%82%A4%E3%82%B9+%E3%81%
8B%E3%82%8B%E3%81%9F

@@ -24,0 +25,5 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>cups (playing card suit)</gloss>

洋杯	462 - Daijir
洋盃	277 - Koj, Unidic
骨杯	< 20 - Koj

I think we need to make the old kanji forms searchable, as we do in other entries. Splitting off the "cop" sense.

@@ -3,0 +4,9 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>洋杯</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>洋盃</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>骨杯</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -11 +20 @@
-<s_inf>hist. also written as 洋盃, 骨杯</s_inf>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -17,5 +25,0 @@
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<misc>&sl;</misc>
-<gloss>cop (police officer)</gloss>
-</sense>

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<s_inf>also written 洋盃 and 骨杯</s_inf>
+<s_inf>hist. also written as 洋盃, 骨杯</s_inf>

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<gloss>glass (i.e. drinking vessel)</gloss>
+<gloss>glass (drinking vessel)</gloss>

I'll let that go in, but I'll note that all the 国語s I checked only have the Dutch source.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<lsource xml:lang="por">Copo</lsource>
+<lsource xml:lang="por">copo</lsource>

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<lsource xml:lang="por">Copo</lsource>

Daijr

Yes, I've come around to the view that avoiding "auxiliary verb" for sense 1 is probably best.

@@ -14,2 +14,2 @@
-<gloss>auxiliary verb (in Japanese)</gloss>
-<gloss g_type="expl">inflecting dependent word</gloss>
+<gloss>inflecting dependent word (in Japanese)</gloss>
+<gloss>bound auxiliary</gloss>

What about 
[1][n][fld=ling]
  inflecting dependent word (in Japanese); bound auxiliary
[2][n][fld=ling]
  auxiliary verb

Reason 1: In Japanese 助動詞 is not a subset of 動詞 and "auxiliary verb" is a mistranslation. Some 助動詞 are more like adjectives.
Reason 2: We do not follow traditional PoS labels exactly, so there's no need to make the translation agree with our PoS labels.
 For example, V-ない、たい、らしい are traditionally labeled 助動詞, but we label them [suf] and [aux-adj].

Reopen.

I'm resetting this to the original two senses, but dropping the note as Rene suggested. I'll close & reopen. I think we should stay with the two senses.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1514640">補助動詞</xref>
@@ -13,2 +14,8 @@
-<s_inf>in Japanese esp. bound</s_inf>
-<gloss>auxiliary verb</gloss>
+<gloss>auxiliary verb (in Japanese)</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">inflecting dependent word</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<field>&ling;</field>
+<gloss>auxiliary verb (in other languages)</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">verb forming the mood, tense, etc. of other verbs</gloss>

i prefer it as two senses as well.  it might not need the examples in the note though

Wikipedia: 言語学でいう助動詞（じょどうし）とは、動詞と同じような形態を持つが、他の動詞と結びついて相、法などの文法機能を表す語である。
日本語の「-て _いる_」や「-て _おく_」など、英語の can や will などがある。
the distinction is not so clear

the two-sense version was too verbose and looked terrible in WWWJDIC
if one wants to keep the two senses distinct it's better to translate sense 1 differently, such as "inflecting auxiliary (in Japanese)"

Daijirin: (1) 国語の品詞の一。付属語で活用のあるもの。用言や他の助動詞に付いて、これにいろいろな意味を加えて叙述を助けたり、名詞その他の語について、これに叙述のはたらきを与えたりする。その表す意味によって、受け身・自発・可能・尊敬・使役・打ち消し・過去・完了・推量・意志・希望・伝聞・様態・断定・比況・丁寧などに分類する。動辞。はたらくてにをは。
(2) ヨーロッパ諸語で、もと独立の動詞であった語が、他の動詞を補助してムードやテンスなどを表すはたらきをなすようになった語。たとえば、英語の shall, will などの類。

I like it better the way it was, with two senses reflecting that 助動詞 means different things when referring to Japanese grammar and European languages. This distinction is quite clear in Daijirin, and cutting back to one sense loses it.
In February Dine wrote: "daijr and nikk have two senses because the definition of "auxiliary verb" is different in traditional Japanese grammar and western grammars". I think it's more that 助動詞 is used differently when discussing those languages.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<s_inf>in Japanese usu. bound</s_inf>
+<s_inf>in Japanese esp. bound</s_inf>

https://www.japanesewithanime.com/2019/11/auxiliary-verbs.html
http://www.japaneselanguageguide.com/grammar/auxiliary-verb.asp

In practice "auxiliary verb" may refer to both 助動詞 (bound) and 補助動詞 (free); it's better to simplify the issue

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1514640">補助動詞</xref>
@@ -14,9 +13,2 @@
-<s_inf>e.g. ます, ない, た</s_inf>
-<gloss>auxiliary verb (in Japanese)</gloss>
-<gloss g_type="expl">inflecting dependent word</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<field>&ling;</field>
-<gloss>auxiliary verb (in other languages)</gloss>
-<gloss g_type="expl">verb forming the mood, tense, etc. of other verbs</gloss>
+<s_inf>in Japanese usu. bound</s_inf>
+<gloss>auxiliary verb</gloss>

daijr: 付属語で活用のあるもの
daijs: 付属語のうち、活用のあるもの
nikk: 日本語で付属語のうち、活用のあるもの

align with 付属語.
Note that 助動詞 is not a subtype of 動詞 in traditional Japanese grammar; Samuel E. Martin translates it as "inflected particles".

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">inflecting suffix or enclitic</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">inflecting dependent word</gloss>

No comments. Closing.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clitic#Enclitic
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Auxiliary_verb

I rather like Dine's suggestion, which seems a neat way to handle this term.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1514640">補助動詞</xref>
@@ -13 +14,9 @@
-<gloss>auxiliary verb</gloss>
+<s_inf>e.g. ます, ない, た</s_inf>
+<gloss>auxiliary verb (in Japanese)</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">inflecting suffix or enclitic</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<field>&ling;</field>
+<gloss>auxiliary verb (in other languages)</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">verb forming the mood, tense, etc. of other verbs</gloss>

daijr and nikk have two senses because the definition of "auxiliary verb" is different in traditional Japanese grammar and western grammars: 
https://kotobank.jp/word/助動詞-80527
What about

[1][n][fld=ling]
  auxiliary verb (in western languages); [expl] verb forming the mood, tense, etc. of other verbs
[2][n][fld=ling]
  auxiliary verb (in Japanese); [expl] inflecting suffixes or enclitics[note="e.g. ます, ない, た"][see=補助動詞]

I think giving "auxiliary verb" as the first translation would solve the PoS-labeling issue.
(Yahoo mailing lists are blocked in China so I can't participate in discussion)

Reopening.

As mentioned below, this is a matter for the mailing list.

also i'm removing the added sense from October, which i accidentally approved when i closed this entry.

@@ -15,5 +14,0 @@
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<field>&ling;</field>
-<gloss>inflecting suffix (in Japanese school grammar)</gloss>
-</sense>

Hi.  I think this issue needs to be raised on the mailing list.  One entry in the dictionary is not the place to discuss/decide how the dictionary's various PoS will be labelled.

In modern linguistic terminology, it seems that suffixes attached to verbs or 
adjectives to form their inflected forms (e.g. English -ing) are called 
"inflectional suffixes", and those that have inflect forms themselves 
"inflecting suffixes". If so, 助動詞 are better translated as "inflecting 
suffixes" because (1) inflectional suffixes that do not inflect themselves (such 
as て and ば) are called 助詞 and (2) です is a 助動詞 but we wouldn't consider 本で
す an inflection of 本.

As for labeling issues, I suggest that we use two sets of POS labels, one for 
Japanese school grammar and one for modern linguistic analysis. For example, we 
can mark ます an auxiliary verb in Japanese school grammar and an inflectional 
suffix in modern linguistics, です an auxiliary verb in Japanese school grammar 
and a copula in modern linguistics, て an inflectional suffix in modern 
linguistics but a conjunctive particle in Japanese school grammar, etc.

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<gloss>inflectional suffix (in Japanese)</gloss>
+<gloss>inflecting suffix (in Japanese school grammar)</gloss>

open for months, so i'm closing.  if we ever resolve the PoS-naming issues, we will revisit the translation

i would prefer not to alter this entry until we figure out some ongoing PoS-labelling issues regarding aux-v, aux, etc.

whatever we decide to call the japanese-language sense, it should be listed first and its name should correspond to the name of the appropriate PoS label

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/助動詞

国文法の助動詞≠西洋文法のauxiliary verb

@@ -14,0 +15,5 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<field>&ling;</field>
+<gloss>inflectional suffix (in Japanese)</gloss>
+</sense>

gg5, prog, ルミナス, daij, meikyo

I've split sense 5 into two senses. I think this is clearer.
Tidied up the other senses.
I don't think we need so many arch senses.
I'll reindex the sentences if this is approved.

@@ -15,2 +14,0 @@
-<pos>&adv;</pos>
-<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
@@ -17,0 +16 @@
+<gloss>over</gloss>
@@ -19,2 +17,0 @@
-<gloss>over</gloss>
-<gloss>elder (e.g. daughter)</gloss>
@@ -25,0 +23 @@
+<gloss>upper part</gloss>
@@ -31,45 +29,57 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<pos>&adv;</pos>
-<gloss>before</gloss>
-<gloss>previous</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<gloss>superiority</gloss>
-<gloss>one's superior</gloss>
-<gloss>one's elder</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<pos>&adv;</pos>
-<s_inf>following a verb or adjective</s_inf>
-<gloss>on top of that</gloss>
-<gloss>besides</gloss>
-<gloss>what's more</gloss>
-<gloss>not only ... but</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<pos>&adv;</pos>
-<s_inf>following a verb or noun</s_inf>
-<gloss>upon (further inspection, etc.)</gloss>
-<gloss>based on (and occurring after)</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<pos>&adv;</pos>
-<gloss>matters concerning ...</gloss>
-<gloss>as concerns ...</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<pos>&adv;</pos>
-<s_inf>as ～上は</s_inf>
-<gloss>since (i.e. "for that reason")</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
+<gloss>on (top of)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<gloss>the above (in a piece of writing)</gloss>
+<gloss>earlier part</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>superior</gloss>
+<gloss>better</gloss>
+<gloss>higher (position, rank, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>upper (class)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>elder</gloss>
+<gloss>older</gloss>
+<gloss>senior</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<s_inf>as ...上で(は) or ...上の</s_inf>
+<gloss>with respect to ...</gloss>
+<gloss>in terms of</gloss>
+<gloss>as far as ... is concerned</gloss>
+<gloss>when (e.g. drunk)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<s_inf>as ...上(に)</s_inf>
+<gloss>besides ...</gloss>
+<gloss>in addition to ...</gloss>
+<gloss>on top of ...</gloss>
+<gloss>as well as ...</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<s_inf>as ...上(で)</s_inf>
+<gloss>after ...</gloss>
+<gloss>upon ...</gloss>
+<gloss>on ...</gloss>
+<gloss>with (e.g. full awareness)</gloss>
+<gloss>as a result of ...</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<s_inf>as ...上で(は)</s_inf>
+<gloss>since ...</gloss>
+<gloss>now that ...</gloss>
+<gloss>because ...</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&suf;</pos>
@@ -78 +88 @@
-<s_inf>suffix indicating higher social standing than the speaker</s_inf>
+<s_inf>after a person of higher status</s_inf>
@@ -81,8 +91,4 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
-<misc>&arch;</misc>
-<gloss>place of one's superior (e.g. the throne)</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
+<gloss>dear</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -94,5 +99,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
-<misc>&arch;</misc>
-<gloss>noblewoman (esp. the wife of a nobleman)</gloss>

Bulk update n-adv to n,adv
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -69 +69,2 @@
-<pos>&n-adv;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>

Bulk update n-adv to n,adv
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -63 +63,2 @@
-<pos>&n-adv;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>

Bulk update n-adv to n,adv
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -56 +56,2 @@
-<pos>&n-adv;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>

Bulk update n-adv to n,adv
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -47 +47,2 @@
-<pos>&n-adv;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>

Bulk update n-adv to n,adv
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -35 +35 @@
-<pos>&n-adv;</pos>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>

Bulk update n-adv to n,adv
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<pos>&n-adv;</pos>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>

I put it there in 2011. GG5 has sense 1 as the noun "〔上部〕 the 「upper [top] side; the 「upper [top] part; 〔表面〕 the surface." and sense 3 covering adjectival use: "上の 〔高い〕 higher 《than…》; 〔…以上の〕 more than…; above…; over…; beyond…; 〔すぐれた〕 superior 《to…》; 〔年上の〕 older 《than…》". That's really our sense 1. I think it's OK.

should "above" and "elder" really be in 
the same sense?

Slight fix.

@@ -52 +52 @@
-<gloss>not only</gloss>
+<gloss>not only ... but</gloss>

Added additional translation to sense 6.

@@ -51,0 +52 @@
+<gloss>not only</gloss>

GG5

Didn't change the order of anything but tried to improve several of the glosses, not least the PoS's.
I think that sense 7 can't follow an adjective and that sense 6 can't follow a noun but I could be wrong.
Not sure of what sense 4 should be.
Might need more work but I think this is at least an improvement.

@@ -24,3 +23,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<pos>&n-adv;</pos>
-<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
@@ -28,0 +26,5 @@
+<gloss>head (e.g. of a staircase)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>surface</gloss>
@@ -34,9 +35,0 @@
-<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
-<gloss>surface</gloss>
-<gloss>on</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<pos>&n-adv;</pos>
-<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
@@ -49,2 +41,0 @@
-<pos>&n-adv;</pos>
-<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
@@ -52 +43,2 @@
-<gloss>one's superior (i.e. one's elder)</gloss>
+<gloss>one's superior</gloss>
+<gloss>one's elder</gloss>
@@ -55,2 +46,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -58 +48 @@
-<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
+<s_inf>following a verb or adjective</s_inf>
@@ -64,2 +53,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -67 +55 @@
-<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
+<s_inf>following a verb or noun</s_inf>
@@ -72,2 +59,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -75,2 +61 @@
-<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
-<gloss>matters concerning...</gloss>
+<gloss>matters concerning ...</gloss>
@@ -80,2 +64,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -83,2 +66 @@
-<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
-<s_inf>as ...上は</s_inf>
+<s_inf>as ～上は</s_inf>
@@ -91 +73,3 @@
-<gloss>suffix indicating higher social standing</gloss>
+<s_inf>suffix indicating higher social standing than the speaker</s_inf>
+<gloss>honorable</gloss>
+<gloss>venerable</gloss>
@@ -96 +80 @@
-<gloss>place of one's superior (i.e. the throne)</gloss>
+<gloss>place of one's superior (e.g. the throne)</gloss>

i think it's my doing, but at some point, pos should be improved.  e.g., i'm sure not all of these act adverbially.

GG5, 新和英中辞典, etc.

My first reaction was "surely that's covered already?", as I've been saying "上の娘" for years (having two daughters). On checking I see the JEs include it in the above/over/etc. gloss, which is where I think it should go too.

@@ -20,0 +20,1 @@
+<gloss>elder (e.g. daughter)</gloss>
@@ -110,5 +111,0 @@
-<sense>
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<s_inf>E.g. 上の妹</s_inf>
-<gloss>elder (of family people in given category, e.g. the elder of one's younger sisters)</gloss>
-</sense>

Add “elder of family members” sense – generally used for “older younger sister” or “older older uncle” etc.
(Same story.)

@@ -110,0 +110,5 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<s_inf>E.g. 上の妹</s_inf>
+<gloss>elder (of family people in given category, e.g. the elder of one's younger sisters)</gloss>
+</sense>

The JEs preface their glosses with "〔病気が〕", etc. but I agree a verbal explanation is hard to word.

@@ -19 +18,0 @@
-<s_inf>often 病気が〜, 風邪が〜, etc.</s_inf>

Yes, I'm not sure an "often ..." type of note is very helpful. I was thinking more of something like 
"can take both an illness and a person, etc. as its subject"
(which is very clumsily worded, but you hopefully get what I mean)

I'm not sure it's necessary. The meaning should be clear from the glosses alone.

Yes, the usual "subject = actor" doesn't apply in this case. Of the 81 Tanaka examples of 治る most are of the <風邪,頭痛,病気,肺炎, etc>が治る pattern. I think a note could help.

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<s_inf>often 病気が〜, 風邪が〜, etc.</s_inf>

“to get better” is slightly more ambiguous which is why I placed “to recover” as the first gloss. 
Also, in response to the anonymous contributor, you can use this verb with people too, therefore “to recover” and “to get better” are valid glosses, as 
shown in this example from Wisdom: 病人はすぐに治った

I think the argument the anonymous contributor was making is that normally, you'd expect the bit that comes before が to be the subject. 
But then again, you can also say "足が治る", in which case the glosses make sense.
moving "to get better" to the front maybe helps a little? A note or something might be helpful too.

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<gloss>to get better</gloss>
@@ -24 +24,0 @@
-<gloss>to get better</gloss>

No. It means "recovered from an illness", etc.

病気が治った doesn't mean "illness recovered" or "illness got well" does it?

Daijr, GG5, etc.

I think this needs to be split. With one exception all of the references I checked have it as two entries, apart from ルミナス which uses different kanji for each sense.

@@ -9,4 +8,0 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>直る</keb>
-<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>
@@ -23 +18,0 @@
-<s_inf>esp. 治る</s_inf>
@@ -26,0 +22 @@
+<gloss>to be restored</gloss>
@@ -30,8 +25,0 @@
-<sense>
-<pos>&v5r;</pos>
-<pos>&vi;</pos>
-<s_inf>esp. 直る</s_inf>
-<gloss>to get mended</gloss>
-<gloss>to be repaired</gloss>
-<gloss>to be fixed</gloss>
-</sense>

@@ -23,0 +24,2 @@
+<gloss>to recover</gloss>
+<gloss>to get well</gloss>
@@ -25,2 +27,2 @@
-<gloss>to get well</gloss>
-<gloss>to be healed</gloss>
+<gloss>to heal</gloss>
+<gloss>to get better</gloss>

No comments, suggestions, etc. Closing.

I'll leave this open for a bit in case.
My go-to references for these sorts of things: Makino&Tsutsui, McClure, Rubin, et al. are silent on this one.

I wonder if we can come up with clearer glosses here.

tightening xref

@@ -10 +10 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2029060">たり</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2029060">たり・4</xref>

G n-grams: 5106761 (also 足る)
Tanaka: 9 examples

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

Entry created

daijs

id (not proverb)

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<misc>&id;</misc>

daijs: "そんなにぐあいよくいくものでaはないというたとえ。"

http://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/srch/all/そうは問屋が卸さない/m0u/  
http://www3.atwiki.jp/chano/pages/33.html

I ran across そうは問屋が卸さなかった as the translation for "It wasn’t going to be that simple."

@@ -21,0 +21,1 @@
+<gloss>it won't be that easy</gloss>

Entry created

Daijr, GG5, Eijiro

Jim, do you have access to 日本方言大辞典 on 
JapanKnowledge? If so, could you possibly 
share any entries it has on がじ, がじる,
がじめる? Thank you!

(usually it's called the 柳に小野道風 or 雨カード etc.)

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<misc>&obsc;</misc>

@@ -13,2 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>the Ono no Michikaze card in hanafuda (esp. when used as a wild card)</gloss>
-<gloss>the rainman card</gloss>
+<gloss>Ono no Michikaze card in hanafuda (esp. when used as a wild card)</gloss>
+<gloss>rainman card</gloss>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/六百間
鬼札
「柳に小野道風」札を鬼札と呼び、カス札以外の点数がある札ならどれでも取れる（柳札以外でも可）。手札から出す場合は、カス札以外の点数札を取ってくる
ことが出来る。山札からめくった場合は、場札に点数札があるならどれでも取ることが出来る。また、必ずしも鬼札として使用する必要はなく、通常の札として
も使用できる。地方によっては「ガジ」、「ガジる」ともいう。
https://qa.itmedia.co.jp/qa1138945.html
"小野道風はガジと言ってどの札をも奪ういことができる。"
https://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q1348765898
"雨のカス札の場合は「鬼札」と言い、光札の場合は「がじ」と言ったりします。「がじ」の語源までは分かりませんが、ガジルという動詞的表現もします。"
https://hanafuda.gozaru.jp/09c-heavenorhell.html
"ガジとはアメの大札のことです。"
https://twitter.com/hashtag/がぢ
"ねぇ、この札、松村家では
「がぢ」っていうんですけど
正式名称なんていうの？？笑笑"

also in a 1971 book on google books (but the word is most likely way older)

隠語大辞典 has a couple of other meanings recorded

Interestingly in Hawaiian hanafuda, another card of the same suit is instead called "gaji" (i.e. in English)