Sense 1 is in daijs and koj.

アプリケーション	5651328
アプリケイション	739
Daijr

Daijr has these two non-computing senses, whereas the JEs only have the computing sense. AFAIK it's usually/mainly used as in sense 1.

@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+<re_inf>&ik;</re_inf>
@@ -14,0 +16,12 @@
+<gloss>application software</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>application</gloss>
+<gloss>putting into use</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>application</gloss>
+<gloss>request</gloss>
+<gloss>petition</gloss>

JWN, Eijiro

Alt. form.

@@ -7,0 +7,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>アプリケイション</reb>

gg5, prog, daij

Added senses.
In the refs, sense 2 and 3 are merged but I think splitting like this is clearer.

@@ -20 +20,28 @@
-<gloss>whatever</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<s_inf>indicates surprise, admiration, etc.</s_inf>
+<gloss>what (a) ...!</gloss>
+<gloss>how ...!</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>surprisingly</gloss>
+<gloss>to my amazement</gloss>
+<gloss>believe it or not</gloss>
+<gloss>why, ...!</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&int;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>oh my</gloss>
+<gloss>wow</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&int;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<s_inf>used when asking for confirmation or approval</s_inf>
+<gloss>well, ...</gloss>
+<gloss>so, ...</gloss>

daij, koj, gg5, prog, chujiten

Given that all the "something" examples in the JEs are 何事か or 何事もなく, I actually think we can drop that sense. As far as I can tell, 何事 by itself is never used with that meaning. Meikyo doesn't even have a "something" sense, and it's only an archaic sense in the other kokugos.

@@ -21,0 +22 @@
+<gloss>what sort of thing</gloss>
@@ -25,8 +26,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2835437">何事か・なにごとか</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2835437">何事か・なにごとか</xref>
-<gloss>something</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="2179230">何事も・なにごとも・1</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2179230">何事も・なにごとも</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2179230">何事も・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2179230">何事も</xref>

Hard pinning down sentences for senses 2 and 3 because many are already linked to 何事か and 何事も.

@@ -24,0 +25 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2835437">何事か・なにごとか</xref>
@@ -28,0 +30 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2179230">何事も・なにごとも・1</xref>

daij, meikyo, prog

"what", "something" and "everything" are separate senses in all the refs except GG5.
I don't think we need a "nothing" sense.

@@ -22,2 +21,0 @@
-<gloss>something</gloss>
-<gloss>everything</gloss>
@@ -27 +25 @@
-<gloss>nothing (with neg. verb)</gloss>
+<gloss>something</gloss>
@@ -31,2 +29,9 @@
-<gloss>something or other</gloss>
-<gloss>unspecified matter</gloss>
+<gloss>everything</gloss>
+<gloss>anything</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<s_inf>used to rebuke someone</s_inf>
+<gloss>what (on earth)?</gloss>
+<gloss>what's the meaning of this ...?</gloss>
+<gloss>what's this ... all about?</gloss>

gg5, prog, wisdom

I don't think all of those glosses are needed.

@@ -21,0 +22 @@
+<gloss>allocation</gloss>
@@ -24,4 +24,0 @@
-<gloss>quota</gloss>
-<gloss>rationing</gloss>
-<gloss>apportionment</gloss>
-<gloss>allocation (risk, resources, etc.)</gloss>

割り振り	110213
割振り	47721
割りふり	1081

Encountered this spelling in the CCs for やはり俺の青春ラブコメはまちがっている。 and ID:INVADED イド：インヴェイデッド.

@@ -10,0 +11,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>割りふり</keb>

daijs, meikyo
勤怠	172864
勤惰	306

Aligning with 勤怠.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1241040">勤怠</xref>
@@ -13 +14 @@
-<gloss>attendance</gloss>
+<gloss>attendance and absence (at work)</gloss>

With 回戦 expanded, I think this can go.

If this is dropped, it may be a good isea to expand the 回戦 entry (1613860). I have proposed some expansions there.

@@ -14,0 +15,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1613860">回戦・かいせん・2</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1613860">回戦・かいせん・2</xref>

Looking at twitter, this doesn't seem more 
common than 8回戦 or 10回戦. So I'm not 
convinced this is more than the sum of its 
parts.

As a non-baseball person I didn't know a regulation game had 9 innings. I'd leave it in.

I'm not sure how important that contextual information is but it's included in all the kokugos. It is quite a long gloss but I don't think it's overly wordy.

@@ -25 +25 @@
-<gloss>first part of a letter used for season's greetings, asking after someone's health, etc.</gloss>
+<gloss>opening part of a letter (used for season's greetings, asking after someone's health, etc.)</gloss>

My issue is that the edit removed the contextual information about the sense that I'm sure Robin intended to include. I didn't think it was overly wordy. If you disagree with that information, that's fine, but I think we need a case to be made that it's not correct or appropriate, and not just an excision.

In regards to the rejected suggestion,
"-<gloss>first part of a letter used for season's greetings, asking after someone's health, etc.</gloss>
+<gloss>opening part of a letter</gloss>"
to which Jim responded:
"This edit had no case or reference. Without  a reason, I don't consider I should approve a change. Resubmit giving reasons and 
references."
Apologies, but doesn't many edits  really speak for themselves? I tried to simplify an overly wordy gloss. If you think the 
original gloss was better, by all means reject the suggestion.

@@ -21 +21 @@
-<gloss>preamble (to a statue, constitution, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>preamble (to a statute, constitution, etc.)</gloss>

daij, gg5, prog, wisdom

Added sense.

@@ -16 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>preamble</gloss>
+<gloss>the above sentence</gloss>
+<gloss>the foregoing remark</gloss>
@@ -20 +21,5 @@
-<gloss>the above statement</gloss>
+<gloss>preamble (to a statue, constitution, etc.)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>first part of a letter used for season's greetings, asking after someone's health, etc.</gloss>

No, he was responding to my comment about sense 4.
Anyway, I think this looks OK now.

@@ -46,0 +47 @@
+<gloss>from a ... standpoint</gloss>

I suspect Marcus meant sense 3?I'll approve this, and on the basis of sense 4 I'll drop the proposed 的に enttry.

Re dropping the "esp." on sense 4, there's 
actually plenty of twitter results for 僕的な　
e.g. "僕的な考えだけど”　"僕的な解釈”

This entry is becoming quite unwieldy.
I think we can merge senses 4 and 5. The "opinion" glosses are somewhat awkward, in my view. Also, I'm not sure that usage is ever adjectival. Might be better to drop "esp."
I don't think sense 3 should be moved to a separate 的な entry as we'd have to copy over senses 1 and 2 as well.

@@ -26,0 +27,2 @@
+<gloss>-sort of</gloss>
+<gloss>-kind of</gloss>
@@ -33 +35 @@
-<gloss>like</gloss>
+<gloss>(something) like</gloss>
@@ -40,9 +42 @@
-<s_inf>used with pronouns or proper nouns, esp. adverbially as ～には</s_inf>
-<gloss>in one's opinion</gloss>
-<gloss>as one sees it</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&suf;</pos>
-<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
-<misc>&col;</misc>
-<s_inf>used with a wide array of nouns, esp. adverbially as ～に(は)</s_inf>
+<s_inf>after a noun or pronoun, esp. adverbially as ～に(は)</s_inf>
@@ -50,0 +45,3 @@
+<gloss>for</gloss>
+<gloss>from the viewpoint of</gloss>
+<gloss>as far as ... is concerned</gloss>

We have a separate entry for みたいな. Based on that precedent, maybe we could break the third sense into 的な and classify it there.

gg5

Definitely more commonly used by men.

@@ -29 +29,3 @@
-<gloss>one's livelihood</gloss>
+<misc>&male;</misc>
+<gloss>one's living</gloss>
+<gloss>livelihood</gloss>

Daijr: (before both senses) 〔動詞「召す」の連用形から。召し上がるものの意。主として男性が用いる語〕

I think it should go on both senses. I don't mind approving this, but I'd like other views.

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<misc>&male;</misc>

https://www.reddit.com/r/japanlife/comments/iwm29d/how_important_is_it_for_a_woman_to_speak_japanese/

@@ -21,0 +22 @@
+<misc>&male;</misc>

all my refs put the rice sense first, which is how i think of it

@@ -18,2 +18,1 @@
-<gloss>meals</gloss>
-<gloss>food</gloss>
+<gloss>cooked rice</gloss>
@@ -23,1 +22,2 @@
-<gloss>cooked rice</gloss>
+<gloss>meal</gloss>
+<gloss>food</gloss>

gg5, prog, daij

Splitting into senses.

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>問返す</keb>
@@ -13,0 +17,5 @@
+<gloss>to repeat one's question</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5s;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
@@ -14,0 +23,2 @@
+<gloss>to ask in return</gloss>
+<gloss>to counter</gloss>

"dick" is originally a euphemism too - "Ultimately from Dick, pet form of the name Richard. The name Dick came to mean "everyman", whence the word acquired its other meanings." (wiktionary) (though wiktionary also calls "dick" (with the meaning penis) "vulgar")
I've seen ナニ in subtitles to represent quite vulgar words so I think "dick" works ok if it's the last gloss.

@@ -42,0 +43 @@
+<gloss>dick</gloss>

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/thing
"10. (slang) A penis."

I think "dick"/"junk" is too vulgar for what is really a euphemism.

@@ -42,2 +42 @@
-<gloss>dick</gloss>
-<gloss>junk</gloss>
+<gloss>(one's) thing</gloss>

https://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q11187125301
ナニとは何ですか？下ネタなのは雰囲気で分かるのですが、意味がわかりません。
...
「ナニ」とか「アレ」は、そのときの文脈で判断するしかありません
「俺のナニを」ならチンコのことでしょうし、「ナニをしてるときに」なら自慰行為、「彼女とナニをしてたら」ならセックスのことでしょう
https://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q10190001520
性的な意味で「ナニ」とはどういう意味なのですか？？
...
おちん〇んのことです
...
性器の事だと思いますよ
https://oshiete.goo.ne.jp/qa/10272176.html
少し下品な話になってしまいますが、たまに男性器を「ナニ」と呼ぶことがあると思います。

https://dic.pixiv.net/a/ナニ
ナニ
「ナニ」とは・・・なんだろうね。
(もしかして)→男性器・セックス

eij
junk: 8. 〈米俗〉あそこ、ナニ◆性器（主に男性器）を指す。

I've noticed that ナニ (always in katakana) is frequently used in Japanese subtitles of English-language movies/TV shows with the meaning "penis". I asked a native speaker if this is really an established expression (when I first saw it) and they commented it's at least commonly used like this in subtitles. 

It's really a subsense of sense 2 but it seems common enough to get its own sense. "masturbation"/"to have sex" don't seem quite as common (and I haven't encountered the word used like that in the wild/in Jp subtitles either)

I considered creating a separate kana-only entry for ナニ but it can be and is of course used with other senses of 何 too and I wouldn't want to direct users looking up the more innocuous use to the wrong entry.

@@ -14,0 +15,4 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ナニ</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>
@@ -32,0 +37,9 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&col;</misc>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<s_inf>esp. ナニ</s_inf>
+<gloss>penis</gloss>
+<gloss>dick</gloss>
+<gloss>junk</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
@@ -47,0 +61 @@
+<gloss>come on!</gloss>

@@ -30 +30 @@
-<gloss>what'-s-her-name</gloss>
+<gloss>what's-her-name</gloss>

OK

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/トーナメント方式

As was pointed out in the comments below, this isn't a counter. It refers to the event itself. It's not used for counting rounds, legs, etc.
There's also a second usage. On the トーナメント方式 wiki article, 4回戦 means "fourth-round match". Contrast with sense 1, where 4回戦 (in boxing) means "4-round bout".

@@ -15,2 +15,2 @@
-<pos>&ctr;</pos>
-<gloss>counter for rounds, innings, legs, etc. in sporting events</gloss>
+<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
+<gloss>event with ... rounds, innings, legs, etc.</gloss>
@@ -20 +20 @@
-<gloss>event with ... rounds, innings, legs, etc.</gloss>
+<gloss>nth-round match (in a knockout tournament)</gloss>

リーダーズ+プラス (uses it for the EJ entries for "legs" and "rounds".

Suggested broadening as it's used in baseball, relay races, etc. 
I approved the 九回戦 can probably be dropped.

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>counter for numbering the rounds in a tournament</gloss>
+<gloss>counter for rounds, innings, legs, etc. in sporting events</gloss>
@@ -20 +20 @@
-<gloss>fight with ... rounds (e.g. boxing)</gloss>
+<gloss>event with ... rounds, innings, legs, etc.</gloss>

Fine line.

In boxing etc., "12回戦" does not mean (as the current gloss suggests) "12th round", but rather "12-round fight."

@@ -17,0 +18,4 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
+<gloss>fight with ... rounds (e.g. boxing)</gloss>
+</sense>

daijr, daijs, nikk: https://kotobank.jp/word/四時-515807

@@ -9,0 +10,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>しいじ</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -11,0 +15 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1307130">四季</xref>

@@ -21,0 +22 @@
+<misc>&id;</misc>

daijr, gg5
飯を喰う	4113
飯を食う	67647

Added sense.

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>飯を喰う</keb>
+<keb>飯を食う</keb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<keb>飯を食う</keb>
+<keb>飯を喰う</keb>
@@ -16 +15,0 @@
-<gloss>to devour a meal</gloss>
@@ -17,0 +17,7 @@
+<gloss>to eat</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<pos>&v5u;</pos>
+<gloss>to make a living</gloss>
+<gloss>to earn one's bread</gloss>

Added additional PoS via batch update.Added additional PoS via batch update.
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -15,0 +15,1 @@
+<pos>&v5u;</pos>

200 sentences! Ive indexed examples for senses 2 & 3.

gg5, prog, daij, meikyo

I think adj-pn is better than adj-f here. That's what shinmeikai has. In all the other kokugos it's an expression (連語).
Added senses.

@@ -11,3 +11,4 @@
-<pos>&adj-f;</pos>
-<gloss>what kind</gloss>
-<gloss>what sort</gloss>
+<pos>&adj-pn;</pos>
+<gloss>what</gloss>
+<gloss>what kind of</gloss>
+<gloss>what sort of</gloss>
@@ -16,2 +17,3 @@
-<pos>&adj-f;</pos>
-<s_inf>in neg. sentences</s_inf>
+<pos>&adj-pn;</pos>
+<s_inf>with. neg. sentence</s_inf>
+<gloss>no ...</gloss>
@@ -19,0 +22,14 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-pn;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<s_inf>as ...のなんの</s_inf>
+<gloss>adds emphasis to the preceding word</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&int;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<s_inf>used to dismiss someone's concerns, words, etc.</s_inf>
+<gloss>no</gloss>
+<gloss>not at all</gloss>
+<gloss>oh (it's nothing)</gloss>
+</sense>

ok

OK?

@@ -14,0 +15,5 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-f;</pos>
+<s_inf>in neg. sentences</s_inf>
+<gloss>any</gloss>
+</sense>

なんの落ち度もない	1104
何の落ち度もない	5113

It should have one or the other. The 何/なん is a bit opaque. Might be better here.

gg5 koj daij
G-ngrams www-images

4th sense mostly in expressions such as こっくり汁, こっくり味噌

@@ -17 +17,2 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
+<pos>&adv-to;</pos>
@@ -19 +19,0 @@
-<pos>&adv-to;</pos>
@@ -21,2 +21 @@
-<gloss>nodding</gloss>
-<gloss>dozing off</gloss>
+<gloss>nodding (in agreement, with approval, etc.)</gloss>
@@ -26,0 +26,8 @@
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<misc>&on-mim;</misc>
+<gloss>repeatedly nodding and dozing off</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
+<pos>&adv-to;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
@@ -29 +36,7 @@
-<gloss>suddenly</gloss>
+<gloss>suddenly (dying)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-f;</pos>
+<misc>&on-mim;</misc>
+<gloss>deep (flavor, flavour, color, colour, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>rich</gloss>

@@ -19,0 +20 @@
+<misc>&on-mim;</misc>
@@ -26,0 +28 @@
+<misc>&on-mim;</misc>

Aligning.

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<gloss>losing the means of livelihood</gloss>
+<gloss>losing one's means of livelihood</gloss>

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1839430">食い上げ</xref>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&id;</misc>

Entry created

OK

The big difference between "watashiteki" and "shiteki" is that "watashiteki" always refers to the speaker, while "shiteki" can refer to 
somebody else. Might this be a good way of demonstrating this? or "personal (e.g. opinion); my"

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<gloss>personal (e.g. opinion)</gloss>
+<gloss>my personal (e.g. opinion)</gloss>

I think so.

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<misc>&col;</misc>

Should this be tagged as col?

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<s_inf>often わたし的には</s_inf>
+<s_inf>oft. as わたし的には</s_inf>

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&food;</field>

I think this is sufficient.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>naan</gloss>
+<gloss>naan (bread)</gloss>
@@ -15 +14,0 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">flatbread in Central and South Asian cuisine</gloss>

koj, daij, wiki

@@ -4,0 +4,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ナン</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -10,1 +13,3 @@
-<gloss>naan (flatbread in Central and South Asian cuisine)</gloss>
+<gloss>naan</gloss>
+<gloss>nan</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">flatbread in Central and South Asian cuisine</gloss>

Entry created

業務アプリケーション	129663

I think this should stay. It's very much a data-processing term, but the sum-of-the parts may not reveal that to the unwary.

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>business-oriented software</gloss>

Entry created

ritsuryo conv test
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>allotment of rice paddies for cultivation during the cultivator's lifetime (ritsuryo system)</gloss>
+<gloss>allotment of rice paddies for cultivation during the cultivator's lifetime (ritsuryō system)</gloss>

OK. The concealed の/が/etc. seem mostly to be in names.

@@ -11,4 +10,0 @@
-<reb>はんでんしゅうじゅほう</reb>
-<re_restr>班田収授法</re_restr>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
@@ -16 +11,0 @@
-<re_restr>班田収授の法</re_restr>

I don't think we should include the "はんでんしゅうじゅほう" (no の) reading if it's not in any of the sources. It's not THAT 
uncommon to see particles like の left out from the kanji form for older/historic words..

@@ -19,0 +20 @@
+<misc>&hist;</misc>

Koj & GG5: use 班田収授法 with the はんでんしゅうじゅ*の*ほう reading
Daijr & ルミナス use 班田収授の法 as the kanji form, with the matching reading
班田収授法	1304
班田収授の法	366
はんでんしゅうじゅのほう	96
はんでんしゅうじゅほう	50

Odd situation. We can:
- split into two entries
- leave it as  Lorenzi has proposed, although it's not our usual practice for format an entry this way
I had wondered about the はんでんしゅうじゅほう reading but it seems it's used.
I'm comfortable with just the one entry. Any other views?

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/班田収授法

I've added a new heading for better correlation of kanji and reading.

@@ -6,0 +7,7 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>班田収授の法</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>はんでんしゅうじゅほう</reb>
+<re_restr>班田収授法</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
@@ -8,0 +16 @@
+<re_restr>班田収授の法</re_restr>

Aligning.

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<gloss>hex</gloss>

Entry created

さえあれば	1191890
さえもあれば	No matches

Sense 2 doesn't apply here.

@@ -12,8 +11,0 @@
-<sense>
-<pos>&exp;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="1005120">さえ・3</xref>
-<gloss>if only</gloss>
-<gloss>if just</gloss>
-<gloss>as long as</gloss>
-<gloss>the only thing needed</gloss>
-</sense>

Aligning.

@@ -10,0 +11,4 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1005120">さえ・3</xref>

Agree.

さえ and すら were split; and so should these

@@ -6,3 +5,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>すらも</reb>

OK, I'll tag it and move on.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>

ポチ袋	44767
ぽち袋	31367
点袋	264

Apart from those and WWW hits, nothing I can see. It seems very marginal, but being used a little. "iK"?

is there a reputable source for 点袋? 
it's in hatena and the wikipedia article, but not on kotobank/weblio

http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/お年玉袋
http://gogen-allguide.com/ho/pochibukuro.html
http://d.hatena.ne.jp/keyword/����
ALC
Google (kanji frequency)

@@ -13 +12,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1577100">何・1</xref>
@@ -15 +14,2 @@
-<gloss>what? (emphatic)</gloss>
+<s_inf>emphatic</s_inf>
+<gloss>what</gloss>

@@ -11,1 +11,1 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
@@ -14,1 +14,1 @@
-<gloss>what (emphatic)</gloss>
+<gloss>what? (emphatic)</gloss>

nikk
for example:
"なんじゃそら"　391,000 results

gg5, prog

@@ -12,0 +13,4 @@
+<misc>&id;</misc>
+<gloss>means of making a living</gloss>
+<gloss>source of income</gloss>
+<gloss>bread and butter</gloss>
@@ -14 +17,0 @@
-<gloss>source of income</gloss>

GG5, etc.

daijr/s, 研究社 新和英中辞典

@@ -10 +9,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1005120">さえ・1</xref>

genius J-E; luminous; prog (https://kotobank.jp/jeword/すら); saito

All the J-Es point to 「さえ」, but it's only the "even" sense.

@@ -13,4 +12,0 @@
-<gloss>if only</gloss>
-<gloss>if just</gloss>
-<gloss>as long as</gloss>
-<gloss>the only thing needed</gloss>

Fixed.

Jim, there are 20 すら that are tagged さえ

@@ -18 +18,2 @@
-<gloss>last player (in hanafuda)</gloss>
+<field>&hanaf;</field>
+<gloss>last player</gloss>

Making 尾季[びき;ビキ] its own entry.

@@ -4,3 +3,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>尾季</keb>
-</k_ele>
@@ -12 +8,0 @@
-<re_nokanji/>
@@ -16 +11,0 @@
-<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -23 +17,0 @@
-<misc>&uk;</misc>

尾季	78

I can only see it being mentioned with the ビキ reading. The case for adding it here is pretty thin, IMHO.

Does the book say it's pronounced びけ？ I see 
Takashi Ebashi gives the pronunciation for the 
same kanji as "Biki" here (based on Spencer 
Palmer's 1891 "Hana-awase" essay)
https://japanplayingcardmuseum.com/6-3-8-0-
henry-spencer-palmer/
Also given as "ビキ” here:
http://puzzlehouse.travel.coocan.jp/PH/kg109/k
g109.html
and as "びーき" in 新言海 (1959, on google 
books)
and there's also a "collected works of 
Miyatake Gaikotsu" book on google which gives 
its as "びき" and suggests "引" as an 
alternative kanji.
jpwiki's hanafuda article also has "ビキ
札を合わせる段階で3番目の人。古くは「大引（おおびき）」
と言った。"
The only connection I can find online between 
びけ and 尾季 is this snippet on google books: 
"おーびけ C大引]骨牌手合の最終の人にて「尾季」" (隠語
辞典集成, 1996)
おーびけ C大引]骨牌手合の最終の人にて「尾季」
Maybe 尾季/びき should be a separate entry?

(I know George through our common interest in 
hanafuda and suggested to him to add words 
that aren't already in the dictionary)

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<re_nokanji/>

尾季：「花かるたの遊び」、 上方屋片岡商店：昭和五年三月廿五日四版

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>尾季</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -11,0 +15 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -17,0 +22 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

Testing the new field tag.

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<field>&hanaf;</field>
@@ -19 +20 @@
-<gloss>last player (in hanafuda)</gloss>
+<gloss>last player</gloss>

see discussion on 2840669

aligning gloss with びけ

@@ -3,0 +4,7 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>尾季</keb>
+<ke_inf>&ateji;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>びき</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -5,0 +13 @@
+<re_nokanji/>
@@ -10 +18,2 @@
-<gloss>last person to play (in hanafuda; sitting on the left of the dealer)</gloss>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>last player (in hanafuda)</gloss>

@@ -10,2 +10 @@
-<gloss>last person to play (in hanafuda/</gloss>
-<gloss>sitting on the left of the dealer)</gloss>
+<gloss>last person to play (in hanafuda; sitting on the left of the dealer)</gloss>

実用日本語表現辞典, 隠語大辞典

Nevermind, seems the 2nd book might have plagiarized parts of the 1st one.

I've seen this in two books, トランプ花合せ遊び方と必勝法 (1947) and トランプ必勝法―附花カルタ遊び方 (1924)
(different authors/publishers)

@@ -6,0 +7,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>尾者</keb>

Testing the new field tag.

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<field>&hanaf;</field>
@@ -19 +20 @@
-<gloss>last player (in hanafuda)</gloss>
+<gloss>last player</gloss>

see discussion on 2840669

aligning gloss with びけ

@@ -3,0 +4,7 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>尾季</keb>
+<ke_inf>&ateji;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>びき</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -5,0 +13 @@
+<re_nokanji/>
@@ -10 +18,2 @@
-<gloss>last person to play (in hanafuda; sitting on the left of the dealer)</gloss>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>last player (in hanafuda)</gloss>

https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/321574 - "This form of stimulation is known as cervical penetration, although this term is misleading, as the cervix is not actually penetrated."
Pixiv: 子宮姦とは、子宮内にペニスや触手を挿入して女性を犯すことである。

Interesting use of 触手. Mercifully not a common term.

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>intrauterine penetration</gloss>

https://dic.pixiv.net/a/子宮姦

I think this is OK. Could be helpful.

@@ -13,2 +13,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1357990">触れる・ふれる・3</xref>
-<s_inf>often AをBに〜</s_inf>
+<xref type="see" seq="1357990">触れる・3</xref>
+<s_inf>oft. as AをBに〜</s_inf>

JWN: 触れさせる （ふれさせる） (v) to expose
Eijiro: AをBに触れさせる : expose A to B
子どもをコンピュータに触れさせる : introduce one's child to a computer
Tanaka: 幼い子どもを優れた音楽に触れさせるべきだ。 Young children should be exposed to good music.

I'm really just floating this, as it seems to be a way of using the causative form of 触れる that isn't really obvious from the related sense of 触れる ((3) to experience; to come in contact with; to perceive)
I guess it can be seen as "to make someone experience", but I wonder if it isn't best to bring it out in its own entry.

RP

Needs context.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&archit;</field>

http://www.kenchikuyogo.com/312-chi/007-chichu_hari.htm
nikk, 日英・英日専門用語辞書　(weblio)'
基礎梁	2477
not super sure about the translation (not my field of expertise) but google images results check out

With the additions just made to the 的 entry, I think this is redundant.

The full dictionary is called 三省堂国語辞典・第七版 (https://dictionary.sanseido-publ.co.jp/dict/ssd13926).
I access mine through the Monokakido dictionary app. It's a modern JP dictionary similar to Shinmeikai or Meikyou, but it tends to 
have slang and modern collocations that other dictionaries sometimes omit.

If we include the relevant senses under 的, then indeed this is unnecessary. My only reasoning for making a separate entry for this 
was because the "-wise; in terms of" sense is strictly adverbial with に or には. If we clarify that with a comment in a sense under 
的, then that might be fine. I feel it is important to be explicit about this sense because it doesn't really derive nicely from "-
ic/-ive/-al" or "-like", but is used frequently in spoken Japanese.

Which "Sanseido kokugo"? It's not in 大辞林.

I am afraid I'm not sure this entry is needed or appropriate. It all hinges on whether XX的に can't really be understood from the straight 的 entry. Exceptions can be set up as their own entries. We have 私的 as an entry and can perhaps have 気持ち的に too - GG5 has it as a sub-entry.

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<gloss>-ical</gloss>
+<gloss>-ically</gloss>

Sanseido Kokugo has sense 2 defined as such:
〔俗〕〔「－に（は）」の形で〕…として。「わたし的には納得できない」(It's hard for me to accept it / agree)「テレビ的には、悪役がいたほうがいい」(In terms of television, it's better if there's an antagonist)

Another example from the internet:
"他のユーザーさんで、ディーゼルでリッター15キロも届かない方がいらして、私には、この情報が信じられないです。乗り方の問題?もしくは車的にハズレ?1度販売店に相談されては?と思いました。".
This "車的にハズレ" should be interpreted as "was it an unlucky draw car-wise?"

I felt this deserved its own entry to encompass the slang meaning of 的に, which is hard to derive from the glosses "-like; kind of; sort of;" in the definition for 的.
The first sense is meant as a fallback for the non-slang usage of 的に as an adverbial suffix, which is a direct extension of the official use of 的.
The second sense is meant to cover things like 気持ち的に, 私的に, 仕事的に, テレビ的に, 車的に etc.

Oops, ビキ was already an entry. Adding 尾季 there.

see discussion/sources in 2840669. 
ビケ	4390
ビキ	14748
seems "ビキ" is possibly more common than "ビケ" (so no xref)

I've now reindexed those sentences.

Many of the sense 4 cases are indexed as sense 2.

gg5

Added sense. This usage accounts for a significant number of the sentences.

@@ -28 +27,0 @@
-<gloss>large number of</gloss>
@@ -29,0 +29,9 @@
+<gloss>a lot of</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&pref;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2529360">何日か</xref>
+<s_inf>followed by a counter and か</s_inf>
+<gloss>several</gloss>
+<gloss>a few</gloss>
+<gloss>some</gloss>

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1577100">何・なに・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1577100">何・1</xref>

Splitting from 1577100 (何/なに), See discussion there,

I don't think so.

@@ -15 +14,0 @@
-<lsource ls_wasei="y"/>

Is it necessary to tag names as wasei?

https://www.maff.go.jp/j/shokusan/gaisyoku/hoseigoto.html
(this page has GoToEat, but in the news it's GoToイート

a similar program in the UK is called "eat out to help out"

食事券	155370
eij

由緒ある	198842
由緒	405082
GG6, etc.

I think we need to be a bit case-by-case on this. 由緒ある is in many of the  JE examples, and accounts for almost half the use of 由緒. I'd let it go in.

ある can be used like this with many different words. We have a couple as entries but I think our policy is to not accept any more.

https://www.weblio.jp/content/由緒ある
https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=由緒ある

Thanks.

藍白	1370
白藍	1779

白藍 is in 色名がわかる辞典 and daijs which is described as a very pale indigo.
is mentioned in the  色名がわかる辞典 entry: "近い色の顔料に藍白あいじろがある。"

searching for "indigo white" I found this: https://encycolorpedia.com/ebf6f7
"The color indigo white (aijiro) with hexadecimal color code #ebf6f7 is a very light shade of cyan."

searching for "ebf6f7", it's described as "pale cyan" and "azure"

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>indigo white</gloss>
+<gloss>pale cyan</gloss>
+<gloss>pale azure</gloss>

How do you explain a color? Unless you add the actual hex code for it. Reading this makes me think it's a shade of white. What else could be 
added?

This literal translation of the kanji is close to useless. It needs an explanation and context.

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/藍白
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Traditional_colors_of_Japan

英和コンピューター用語辞典, etc.

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>１６進</keb>
+<keb>十六進</keb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<keb>十六進</keb>
+<keb>１６進</keb>
@@ -14,0 +15,2 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2501930">十六進法・じゅうろくしんほう</xref>
@@ -15,0 +18,2 @@
+<gloss>hexadecimal</gloss>
+<gloss>hexadecimal notation</gloss>
@@ -17,2 +20,0 @@
-<gloss>base 16</gloss>
-<gloss>hexadecimal</gloss>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/十六進法
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/ウェブカラー#16進トリプレット表記

Wikij, GG5

Also 鬱陵島

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>Ullvng Island</gloss>
+<gloss>Ulleungdo Island (Korea)</gloss>
+<gloss>Ullung Island</gloss>

GG5

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>Ullung Island</gloss>

ウルルン島 has its own entry.

@@ -10,3 +9,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>ウルルンとう</reb>
-</r_ele>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/鬱陵島
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ulleungdo

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/西村宏堂