daijs

@@ -14,3 +13,0 @@
-<reb>じぐ</reb>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
@@ -18 +14,0 @@
-<re_nokanji/>

daijr

Yes. (Or noun, depending on the word.)

@@ -20,0 +21 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1372200">水溶性</xref>

daijs

We usually treat -性 entries as adj-no, I believe?

@@ -15 +15,2 @@
-<pos>&adj-f;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<gloss>water-based</gloss>
@@ -17 +18,4 @@
-<gloss>water-based</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<gloss>water-soluble</gloss>

水溶性の	70195
水溶性が	2390
水溶性を	2455

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

gg5, daij

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>買置き</keb>
@@ -11,0 +15 @@
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
@@ -12,0 +17,2 @@
+<gloss>reserve</gloss>
+<gloss>supply</gloss>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>a stock (of goods)</gloss>
+<gloss>stock (of goods)</gloss>

GG5, 中辞典

May as well stay. It's the process.

@@ -12,2 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>adding luster</gloss>
-<gloss>adding lustre</gloss>
+<gloss>polishing process</gloss>
+<gloss>glazing process</gloss>

艶出し加工	544
艶出し	120681


our 艶出し entry says: burnishing; glazing; polishing

This entry is prob not needed. If it is, it should maybe be aligned with the 艶出し entry.

gg5, daij

@@ -9,0 +10,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>にくかん</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -12,0 +16,5 @@
+<gloss>carnal desire</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>physical feeling</gloss>

ルミナス

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<gloss>voluptuous</gloss>

daij, prog

@@ -9,0 +10,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>にくかんてき</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -12,0 +16 @@
+<gloss>sexy</gloss>

Bulk update: removing noun POSBulk update: removing noun POS
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<misc>&id;</misc>

daij, meikyo

@@ -10,0 +11,7 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1457690">奈落・1</xref>
+<gloss>depths of Hell</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
@@ -12,0 +20 @@
+<gloss>inescapable situation</gloss>

Daijr, GG5

@@ -14,0 +15,4 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>one-leg entanglement (judo)</gloss>
+</sense>

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>かわづかけ</reb>
+<reb>かわづがけ</reb>

@@ -12,1 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>hooking backward counter throw (sumo)</gloss>
+<field>&sumo;</field>
+<gloss>hooking backward counter throw</gloss>

Yes.

I think this works better?

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<gloss>homonym (that has a native Japanese reading)</gloss>
+<gloss>homonym that has a native Japanese reading</gloss>

I looked at it a couple of times without coming up with anything useful. I think this works.

Oops.

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<gloss>homonym (that has that a native Japanese reading)</gloss>
+<gloss>homonym (that has a native Japanese reading)</gloss>

I'm not sure how best to gloss this.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1956150">訓・くん・1</xref>
@@ -13 +14 @@
-<gloss>kun homonym</gloss>
+<gloss>homonym (that has that a native Japanese reading)</gloss>

Not irregular. Daijs has that form and there are plenty of hits online.

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<ke_inf>&ik;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>

詰め放題	35680
つめ放題	12831

Daijr, https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2011/03/11/business/annals-of-cheap-tsume-hodai/
"Customers stuff bags provided by the retailer with as much of a given product as they can fit into them and then pay a set low price for each filled bag. Some years ago when the idea was first launched, it was usually only low-priced vegetables that were offered, like potatoes or onions. Eventually, vegetables were joined by fruit, then fish, and even sometimes meat. Last weekend we saw a tsume-hodai table set up on the street outside a discount supermarket offering pastries and other baked goods. "

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>つめ放題</keb>
@@ -16 +19 @@
-<gloss>filling (e.g. a shopping bag) as one pleases</gloss>
+<gloss>stuffing a shopping container for a fixed price</gloss>

https://kotobank.jp/word/詰放題-684197
https://www.weblio.jp/content/詰め放題

詰め放題		35680
詰放題		57

I have put a tweak into the policy on names to include "and major cities in Korea". I wouldn't object to a few more (we have 4 in the south and one in the north.) I'll close this now.

The funny/curious thing about Korean placenames is that even though they are read as if they were written in katakana, they are 
actually often written in kanji. The big exception is ソウル, which is never seen in kanji, because it is a word that is based on 
pure Korean rather than Sino-Korean. Virtually all other placenames in both South and North Korea are Sino-Korean.
An example of an article where "Daegu" was written as 大邱: https://book.asahi.com/article/13370476
An example of an article that uses kanji with katakana pronunciation between brackets (perhaps the most common way to deal with 
things): https://news.yahoo.co.jp/articles/a5751db09004a188d2de8db8ce0729d386681ae8

I do understand the logic behind e.g. American placenames being more frequent in Japanese media than Korean ones, but perhaps Korea 
should not be treated the same as e.g. Spain. I wouldn't say more placenames have to be added for every country, but maybe at least 
the other countries in the Sinosphere (i.e. Korea and China) deserve higher prevalence.

https://www.edrdg.org/wiki/index.php/Editorial_policy#Proper_Names

It's been a bit of a balancing act to come up with in/out rules for place names. We need to be consistent, even-handed, etc. as well as being actually useful. It's been a while since I read the Japanese press much, but I got the impression that city names in the US and Europe occurred more often that cities in Korea, and I think the Korean ones were often in katakana (could be wrong).
I wouldn't object to some more Korean cities being included in addition to the four we have now, but I'd prefer that we started from a recognized policy and implemented it. As I commented in another entry, we'd allow Seville and Barcelona in Spain, but probably not Granada. That's the sort of criteria we're using with Korea.

It's a Japanese-English dictionary, so Japanese and English names take priority.

May I ask why, for example, "states and provinces of English-speaking countries and their capital cities" are seen as appropriate 
dictionary entries, while names of major cities in the Sinosphere are not? I know that the Korean place names I added already 
appear as part of the name dictionary, but the point of adding them to jmdict is that one would in one glimpse be able to see four 
different things, namely: (1.) the placename in kanji; (2.) the placename in katakana; (3.) the placename according to on-yomi 
(which in case of Korea is archaic but not unuseful information); and (4.) the English (or alphabet) notation. If you ask me, this 
is a lot more useful information compared to the placenames of English-speaking countries, which only mention (2.) and (4.). But 
again, that's just me. I would love to see your opinions.

Rejecting fork. I'll move your question.

Is [n,place] ok?

Reopen.

Two comments:
(a) I agree with the suggestion that 県-less versions go in for the prefecture names. In some cases, such as 長野. we should mention it's a city as well. I'll approve this one and reopen as a reminder.
(b) I like  Tsuchida-san's suggestion to add 常陸, etc. We have a few such old names already e.g. 難波. I wouldn't include the suffix 国.

I am a newbie on this platform so please don't mind my lack of education. I have understood that in the addition of placenames, 
priority is given to Japanese and English names.
I agree with the comment below. Furthermore, I would also like to suggest adding the 70-ish 旧国名 to the dictionary. For example:
常陸　ひたち　Hitachi (old province in the area of Ibaraki Prefecture)
伊豆　いず　　Izu (old province in the area of eastern Shizuoka Prefecture)
...etc.
The names of these former Japanese provinces still play a big role in society as they are often used in company names, etc. 
I would like to leave it open to debate whether these names should then be added with or without the suffix 国 ("no kuni").

Marcus: Is [n,place] ok?
- probably not necessary since it mentions prefecture.
Tsuchida: please make sure you respond to the most recent active edit, otherwise we get 
"forked" threads which have to be rejected.
I think your proposed text style is fine. I think I prefer it in parentheses, but others may 
prefer an "expl" gloss. Let's see.

@@ -16 +15,0 @@
-<misc>&place;</misc>

In that case, I will begin adding the 旧国名 and see whether you like it. But before I do, I have noticed that there is no 
consistency between the already existing definitions in terms of notation. For example:
薩摩　さつま　Satsuma (ancient province located in present-day Kagoshima prefecture)
大和　やまと　Yamato; ancient province corresponding to modern-day Nara Prefecture
武蔵　むさし　Musashi; historical region consisting of modern Tokyo, Saitama and eastern Kanagawa prefectures

I would like to hear your opinions about a format to make these definitions consistent. I was thinking myself:
Name (former province located in present-day XXX Prefecture)
(i.e. the explanation between brackets, with "former" instead of "ancient" and "Prefecture" capitalized.)

Two comments:
(a) I agree with the suggestion that 県-less versions go in for the prefecture names. In some cases, such as 長野. we should mention it's a city as well. I'll approve this one and reopen as a reminder.
(b) I like  Tsuchida-san's suggestion to add 常陸, etc. We have a few such old names already e.g. 難波. I wouldn't include the suffix 国.

I am a newbie on this platform so please don't mind my lack of education. I have understood that in the addition of placenames, 
priority is given to Japanese and English names.
I agree with the comment below. Furthermore, I would also like to suggest adding the 70-ish 旧国名 to the dictionary. For example:
常陸　ひたち　Hitachi (old province in the area of Ibaraki Prefecture)
伊豆　いず　　Izu (old province in the area of eastern Shizuoka Prefecture)
...etc.
The names of these former Japanese provinces still play a big role in society as they are often used in company names, etc. 
I would like to leave it open to debate whether these names should then be added with or without the suffix 国 ("no kuni").

Adding some context

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss>Maesa japonica</gloss>
+<gloss>Maesa japonica (species of flowering plant)</gloss>

Daijr, GG5,https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maesa
いずせんりょう	28
伊豆千両	32
イズセンリョウ	391

daij
治工具	22629

https://ejje.weblio.jp/content_find/prefix/0/一液

一液性	1615
一液型接着剤	34
一液ウレタン	501
一液エポキシ	51
一液型	971

https://ejje.weblio.jp/content_find/prefix/0/二液

I think usually "two-part epoxy" (that's where I stumbled upon this, and it's what google brings up first)

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos>

返す刀	14809
Daijr

Koj references 返し刀 which has a different (older?) meaning.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>attack the other opponents along the first target</gloss>
+<gloss>attacking one opponent then immediately attacking another</gloss>

https://word-dictionary.jp/posts/3489
https://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/word/返す刀/

GG5, etc.

メチル化する	472

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<pos>&vs;</pos>

gg5, eij

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&chem;</field>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/メチル化

Not obvious.

Heard it used like this on TV (about 
comedian Miyazako's success as a YouTuber 
after being "shut out" from TV after the 
yakuza thing last year)

Daijr (has a second sense.)

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<gloss>horse tub</gloss>

daijs

GG5

@@ -1,3 +1,2 @@
-<ent_seq>50</ent_seq>
-<ent_corp>test</ent_corp>
+<ent_corp>jmdict</ent_corp>
@@ -12 +11,2 @@
-<gloss>A technique in which the attacker circles behind his opponent, then lifts him up and slams him down.</gloss>
+<field>&sumo;</field>
+<gloss>rear lifting body slam</gloss>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/送り吊り落とし