[vi]: sankoku, iwakoku, smk

〈火／ひ／ヒ〉〈遊（び）／あそび／アソビ〉

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 火遊び　 │ 53,251 │ 97.2% │
│ 火あそび │    633 │  1.2% │ - sK
│ ひ遊び　 │    256 │  0.5% │
│ 火遊　　 │    146 │  0.3% │
│ ヒ遊び　 │     47 │  0.1% │
│ ひ遊　　 │     43 │  0.1% │
│ ひあそび │    397 │  0.7% │
╰─ーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -19,0 +21 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -24,0 +27 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -31,0 +35 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

Better to tag the second sense as figurative.

@@ -20 +20 @@
-<gloss>(actually) playing with fire</gloss>
+<gloss>playing with fire</gloss>
@@ -26 +25,0 @@
-<gloss>playing with fire</gloss>
@@ -27,0 +27 @@
+<gloss g_type="fig">playing with fire</gloss>

@@ -20 +20 @@
-<gloss>playing with fire</gloss>
+<gloss>(actually) playing with fire</gloss>
@@ -25,2 +25,3 @@
-<gloss>playing with something dangerous</gloss>
-<gloss>dangerous act</gloss>
+<misc>&id;</misc>
+<gloss>playing with fire</gloss>
+<gloss>doing something dangerous</gloss>

KM n-grams:
まもなく発売	395
間もなく発売	181
まもなく完成	287
間もなく完成	198
もうまもなく	504
もう間もなく	883

OK.

@@ -30 +30 @@
-<s_inf>after a verb</s_inf>
+<s_inf>after the dictionary form of a verb</s_inf>

KM n-grams:
間もなく入荷	25
まもなく入荷	51
間もなく公開	95
まもなく公開	203

Note the reversal of ratios for 間もなく入荷 and まもなく入荷. This wasn't because Japanese WWW pages changed between 2004 and 2007; it was because Kudoh et al. used the old IPADIC to drive the Google n-gram segmentation, and I used the later and more accurate Unidic to do the KM ones.
Maybe sense 1 should keep the "uk"? I'm comfortable either way.

@@ -20,0 +21 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

@@ -21 +20,0 @@
-<misc>&uk;</misc>

gg5, prog
間もなく入荷	220437
まもなく入荷	46874
間もなく公開	5029
まもなく公開	205046
して間もなく	35788
してまもなく	28413
---
見る間もなく	3235
見るまもなく	610

Sense 2 isn't uk.
For sense 1, the numbers are all over the place but given that the JEs use kanji in their examples, I think we should drop the uk tag.

@@ -25,0 +26 @@
+<gloss>in a little while</gloss>
@@ -29,4 +30,3 @@
-<misc>&uk;</misc>
-<s_inf>after verb</s_inf>
-<gloss>lacking time to ...</gloss>
-<gloss>without time to ...</gloss>
+<s_inf>after a verb</s_inf>
+<gloss>having no time to ...</gloss>
+<gloss>with no time to ...</gloss>

gg5, daijr

@@ -24,0 +25,4 @@
+<gloss>nine years of age</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>

GG5: 〔昔の時刻〕 12 o'clock.  Daijr: 昔の時刻の名。今の午前と午後の12時頃。ここのつどき。

See discussion on 四つ/1307040.

@@ -22,0 +23,4 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>twelve o'clock (old time system)</gloss>
+</sense>

normalising every number entries to use the 'num' POS tag.

@@ -20,1 +20,1 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&num;</pos>

I agree it doesn't belong here. It's only mentioned in a kanwa entry.

@@ -9,4 +8,0 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>仐</keb>
-<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>

I doubt it's appropriate to add the 仐 kanji, even as "iK". It's virtually never used. The only place it's mentioned in that Kotobank reference is in Daijisen (as a 略字) for a sense we dont even record.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ryakuji
https://kotobank.jp/word/傘-44047

@@ -8,0 +9,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>仐</keb>

@@ -24 +24 @@
-<gloss>something shaped like an umbrella or conical hat</gloss>
+<gloss>something shaped like an umbrella or a conical hat</gloss>

googits:
  キノコの傘	84K
  キノコの笠	5K
  電気の傘	74K
  電気の笠	42K

lamp shades and mushroom caps come in many shapes

@@ -25 +25 @@
-<gloss>something shaped like a conical hat</gloss>
+<gloss>something shaped like an umbrella or conical hat</gloss>

@@ -33 +33 @@
-<gloss>ten o'clock (old time system)</gloss>
+<gloss>ten o'clock (in the old time system)</gloss>

@@ -40 +40 @@
-<gloss>Burakumin</gloss>
+<gloss>burakumin</gloss>

@@ -24,0 +25 @@
+<gloss>4</gloss>

gg5, daijr

@@ -24,0 +25,4 @@
+<gloss>seven years of age</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>

GG5: 〔午前 4 時･午後 4 時〕 4 o'clock 「am [pm].  Daijr: 昔の時刻の名。今の午前と午後の四時頃。七つ時。

See discussion on 四つ/1307040.

@@ -22,0 +23,4 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>four o'clock (old time system)</gloss>
+</sense>

normalising every number entries to use the 'num' POS tag.

@@ -20,1 +20,1 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&num;</pos>

Bulk update: Adjusting POS details
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

Just about to do this. There are 225 to change.

that makes sense to me

Could we make all adj-na,n,adj-no tags into adj-na,adj-no,n through a script, maybe?

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -17 +17,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -21,0 +22 @@
+<gloss g_type="lit">big-bellied</gloss>

gg5, Wisdom

I don't think the x-ref is necessary.

@@ -14 +13,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1215290">間もなく・まもなく・1</xref>
@@ -16 +15,2 @@
-<gloss>directly</gloss>
+<gloss>right away</gloss>
+<gloss>at once</gloss>
@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<gloss>in a moment</gloss>

GG5

@@ -14,0 +14,1 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1215290">間もなく・まもなく・1</xref>
@@ -15,1 +16,0 @@
-<gloss>readily</gloss>
@@ -21,0 +21,5 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
+<gloss>easily</gloss>
+<gloss>readily</gloss>
+</sense>

GG2

@@ -17,0 +17,3 @@
+<gloss>soon</gloss>
+<gloss>shortly</gloss>
+<gloss>before long</gloss>

gg5, prog, daij
痛め付ける	1105
痛めつける	30714

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>痛め付ける</keb>
+<keb>痛めつける</keb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<keb>痛めつける</keb>
+<keb>痛め付ける</keb>
@@ -16,4 +15,0 @@
-<gloss>to rebuke</gloss>
-<gloss>to taunt</gloss>
-<gloss>to give a good shaking</gloss>
-<gloss>to knock about</gloss>
@@ -21,0 +18,5 @@
+<gloss>to treat harshly</gloss>
+<gloss>to beat up</gloss>
+<gloss>to give a drubbing</gloss>
+<gloss>to cause damage to</gloss>
+<gloss>to harm</gloss>

GG2

@@ -20,0 +20,2 @@
+<gloss>to torment</gloss>
+<gloss>to punish</gloss>

gg5
daijr/s

@@ -14 +14,7 @@
-<gloss>riddled with wounds</gloss>
+<gloss>being wounded all over</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&yoji;</misc>
+<gloss>receiving a drubbing</gloss>
+<gloss>being subjected to a barrage of criticism</gloss>

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>riddled with wounds</gloss>

Kanji Haitani list

Adding yoji tagAdding yoji tag
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<misc>&yoji;</misc>

ジーニアス

@@ -24,0 +25 @@
+<misc>&on-mim;</misc>
@@ -26 +27 @@
-<gloss>smooth (skin, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>smooth (skin, stone, etc.)</gloss>

n-gram counts in comment history below

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -8,0 +10 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

Nelson(s): "fail an exam", S&H and Halpern: "flunk an exam".

I'll make it "fail exam".

By the way, the kanjidic entry for 滑 has "flunk" as one of the meanings, which I don't quite think is correct. (The closest to that I see is a meaning of "乱す", like disorder.)

gg5

Adding second sense from 間もなく entry.

@@ -12 +12,3 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1215290">間もなく</xref>
+<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1215290">間もなく・1</xref>
+<s_inf>after a noun or the -te form of a verb</s_inf>
@@ -13,0 +16,9 @@
+<gloss>immediately after</gloss>
+<gloss>just</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1215290">間もなく・2</xref>
+<s_inf>after the dictionary form of a verb</s_inf>
+<gloss>having no time to</gloss>

Entry created

I've proposed an entry for 〻, so this can be closed.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2844877">〻・おなじ</xref>
@@ -13 +13,0 @@
-<s_inf>i.e. 〻</s_inf>

I think that would be a good idea.

It doesn't have a reading. 々 doesn't either but we fudge it by saying it's のま (The JIS213 standard adds くりかえし and おなじ to these pseudo-readings.) Perhaps we should make an entry for 〻 and say it's read のま or おなじ. It's treated as a kanji and we need some sort of reading.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<s_inf>e.g. 〻</s_inf>
+<s_inf>i.e. 〻</s_inf>

Initially I wanted it to be its own entry, but I didn't know what the reading would be.

https://ja.wiktionary.org/wiki/〻

〻 is not read にのじてん, the same way 々 is not read どうのじてん and isn't in the 同の字点 entry; it's the *name* of the symbol. I'm suggesting it as a note here, but maybe it should be in its own entry, as we do with 々. (See the comments on entry 1000060  for an extended discussion how these repetition marks are handled.

@@ -6,3 +5,0 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>〻</keb>
@@ -16 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>iteration mark used to represent repetition of the previous kanji (to be read using its kun-yomi)</gloss>
+<s_inf>e.g. 〻</s_inf>
+<gloss>iteration mark used to represent repetition of the previous kanji (to be read using its kun'yomi)</gloss>

お悔やみ申し上げます	62301
お悔やみ申し上げる	2193

There may be a case for adding お悔やみ申し上げる as an entry, but the polite expression is 30 
times more common, and should stay as it is.

https://twitter.com/TH6TV/status/1264096243455672320

This should probably be お悔やみ申し上げる instead

Entry created

Feel it needs a little more context.

various tweets from the recent tab for "捨て駒に"
"今回のことは高校三年生の子達も気の毒。本来であれば、授業の遅れや入試に対しての救済措置が論じられなければいけなかったのに、純粋な気持ちが政治に利
用され、未就学児だけでなく、この子たちも捨て駒にされた。#九月入学を廃案に"
"また何かあったら捨て駒にされるのかと思うと…転職したいです。"
"ユリはルードに捨て駒にされ、ケット・シーと遊び、レノに恋をし、最終的にユフィと親友になります。"
"...自腹を切ってまで恩を押し売り投資をして断れない状況にして他人に嫌がらせや妨害工作のお方棒を担がせ最後には罪をなすりつけ、「私も◯◯に騙されたん
よ。私も可哀想な被害者よ。」で、あっさり捨て駒にされてジ・エンド、他人は利用して搾取するものとしか考えてない。..."
"そうなんですね…うまく利用された感じでしょうか？
所詮支配層の彼等からしたら捨て駒に過ぎない、国民を人間扱いなんてしてないですからw"

more hits for the figurative sense than the literal one on twitter.

@@ -18,0 +19,4 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>sacrifice</gloss>
+</sense>

None of the references I looked at mentions figurative use of this. Without specific examples, it's hard to add anything.  Some I found include:
香港問題の本質とは？金融センターが国際政治の「捨て駒」になる道
米中抗争の「捨て駒」にされる韓国の通販できる商品のページです。
but this is just the regular meaning, being used figuratively. That can be done for anything.

also figuratively, maybe another sense?

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<field>&shogi;</field>
@@ -16 +17 @@
-<gloss>sacrificed piece (in shogi)</gloss>
+<gloss>sacrificed piece</gloss>

I do too.

I feel like the "actually" isn't needed?

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>actually tasting a food that one has heard of before</gloss>
+<gloss>tasting a food that one has previously heard of</gloss>

daijs

yes, I like that definition better - the first one sort of 
made it seem like meaning was mainly "eating immediately after 
buying." Though daijs mention "料金をはらって" I don't think this 
is necessarily true, I've heard "gourmet reporters" on morning 
TV say stuff like "では実食したいと思います" so the paying part 
seems voluntary

@@ -12,2 +12,2 @@
-<pos>&vt;</pos>
-<gloss>trying out a food item one has just bought (dish from a famous restaurant, new product, etc.)</gloss>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<gloss>actually tasting a food that one has heard of before</gloss>

"actually tasting a food that one has heard of before"?

お客さんにもインタビューしてみましたよ。
2種類それぞれを実食。ぱくり。
「温玉がとろとろ。シラスもふかふか。おいしい！」
「焼きそばなのになんかお洒落…。不思議な組み合わせだけど、イケる!!」
http://www.fabcafe.com/blog/2012/06/07/777lunch/
.
［名］(スル)（新発売の食品や、評判の、また有名店の料理などを）料金を払って実際に
食べること。「―レポート」
http://kotobank.jp/word/実食

低評価	27558	  
低評価を	3422	  
低評価の	3136	  
低評価に	2543

I think both should be glossed as a noun. I'll amend 高評価.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

高評価 is listed as adj-no. Is is the same for this too? If so, the glosses could do with some symmetrical aligning.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="ant" seq="2592510">高評価</xref>

"... 最近知恵袋を利用するようになって知ったのは関西の中でも大阪人に対する圧倒
的な低評価…(-"-)"
http://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q141
9675804
ngrams

低評価	27558

Call me a grumpy old man, but I'm not fond of anonymous, reference-free edits blowing away existing senses.

@@ -15,2 +15,5 @@
-<gloss>what a mess!</gloss>
-<gloss>oh brother!</gloss>
+<gloss>what are we going to do?</gloss>
+<gloss>uh-oh</gloss>
+<gloss>oh crap</gloss>
+<gloss>what a mess</gloss>
+<gloss>oh brother</gloss>

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<pos>&int;</pos>
@@ -14,3 +15,2 @@
-<gloss>What are we going to do?</gloss>
-<gloss>uh-oh</gloss>
-<gloss>oh crap</gloss>
+<gloss>what a mess!</gloss>
+<gloss>oh brother!</gloss>

http://ejje.weblio.jp/content/えらいこっちゃ
called kyoto-ben here:
https://nanapi.jp/52599

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<dial>&osb;</dial>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<dial>&ksb;</dial>
@@ -13,0 +15,2 @@
+<gloss>uh-oh</gloss>
+<gloss>oh crap</gloss>

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>偉いこっちゃ</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -8,0 +12 @@
+<dial>&osb;</dial>

http://www.koka.ac.jp/morigiwa/regina/jsl.htm

An expression from the Osaka dialect.

That's one of the 218 sentences linked to わけではない (2057560 - it does not mean that ...; I don't mean that ...; it is not the case that..). 
I don't think it impacts this entry.

There's a Tanaka sentence using de instead of ni.

もちろん万能ではないからといって価値がないわけではないから、ＧＴＤはダメということにはならない。
Of course you can't say that it's worth nothing because it isn't perfect, so that doesn't mean that GTD is useless.

I don't think "though against one's will" is necessary. The glosses make the meaning clear enough.

@@ -18,2 +18,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2057580">訳にはいかない・わけにはいかない</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2057580">訳にはいかない・わけにはいかない</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2057580">わけにはいかない</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2057580">わけにはいかない</xref>
@@ -21,4 +21,5 @@
-<s_inf>with neg. verb stem</s_inf>
-<gloss>can't avoid doing (though against one's will)</gloss>
-<gloss>can't help but doing</gloss>
-<gloss>must do</gloss>
+<s_inf>after neg. verb stem</s_inf>
+<gloss>cannot avoid (doing)</gloss>
+<gloss>cannot help (doing)</gloss>
+<gloss>have no other choice but to</gloss>
+<gloss>must (do)</gloss>

ない訳には行かない	4180
ないわけにはいかない	127976
ないわけには行かない	14583
ない訳にはいかない	25641
訳にはいかない	178600
わけにはいかない	911776
5 Tanaka sentences.

I wondered about just a note on わけにはいかない, but I see the point about not just being a negation. Good to have it searchable.

@@ -3,0 +4,6 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ない訳にはいかない</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ないわけには行かない</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -11,0 +18 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2057580">訳にはいかない・わけにはいかない</xref>
@@ -12,0 +20 @@
+<s_inf>with neg. verb stem</s_inf>

typo

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>whether it be ... or ....</gloss>
+<gloss>whether it be ... or ...</gloss>

Not needed; I see plenty of examples without the comma (e.g. in the GG5 example.)

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<s_inf>as ...といい、...といい</s_inf>
+<s_inf>as ...といい...といい</s_inf>

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<s_inf>as ...といい...といい</s_inf>
+<s_inf>as ...といい、...といい</s_inf>

I don't think it's necessary in this case. The note and the glosses both have two sets of ellipses.
We tend to use letters only when there's repetition of same term, or when order is important.

使用権限	5019
使用権	180992 <- current entry. "use; right to use"
権限 - power; authority; jurisdiction

I think this is more accurate and differentiates it from 使用権.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>usage right</gloss>
+<gloss>usage authorization</gloss>

使用権限	5019
https://help.adobe.com/ja_JP/livecycle/11.0/ReaderExtHelp/WS1a95df6a070ac5e34716067a12f7d24df97-8000.2.html
https://help.adobe.com/en_US/livecycle/11.0/ReaderExtHelp/WS1a95df6a070ac5e34716067a12f7d24df97-8000.2.html

Possibly, but we have several similar terms here: ハッブル宇宙望遠鏡, ジェイムズウェッブ宇宙望遠鏡, フェルミガンマ線宇宙望遠鏡, オスパー, スペースラブ, ウォストーク

name dictionary?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artemis_program  "international partners such as the European Space Agency (ESA), the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA), Canadian Space Agency (CSA) and the Australian Space Agency (ASA)"

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>artemis program</gloss>
+<gloss>Artemis program (crewed spaceflight program)</gloss>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/アルテミス計画

Nikk has 阻絶/そぜつ: 〘名〙 さえぎりたちきること。また、ゆききのとざされた土地。
https://kotobank.jp/word/阻絶-2057234   http://yourei.jp/阻絶

I'm inclined to let it in since Hendrik has hit it in a text he's translating (and Eijiro has had it for years.). We can't say it's A+B as we don't have the B.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<misc>&obsc;</misc>

G n-grams:
道路阻絶	No matches
阻絶	No matches
<300 googits

Where did you encounter this term?
Neither 道路阻絶 nor 阻絶 is in my refs.

weblio, kotoban, eijirou, etc.

Text Glossing came up empty on "阻絶", also on "阻。絶" (forced separation of kanji)...

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<s_inf>from 文字コラージュ</s_inf>
+<xref type="see" seq="2727250">コラ</xref>
+<misc>&sl;</misc>

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>もじこら</reb>
+<reb>もじコラ</reb>

文字コラ	29
Many WWW hits and images

Very Japanese.

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>An image that has had text edited onto it, esp. as a "pornographic caption". Short for 文字コラージュ</gloss>
+<s_inf>from 文字コラージュ</s_inf>
+<gloss>image overlaid with text</gloss>

Google

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>マグ・ショット</reb>

d-daijs: https://kotobank.jp/word/マグショット-673703

マグショット	701

I guess it's good to have its existence confirmed.

12977 ngrams

not in any ref, but somewhat common.  also somewhat obvious.  not sure if it's needed

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>hand manufacture?</gloss>
+<gloss>processing by hand</gloss>
+<gloss>manufacturing by hand</gloss>

Bulk update: Testing POS update
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -13 +13,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

About to test again.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -13 +13,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>

Bulk update: Testing POS update
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -13 +13,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

Preparing to test POS changes

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

Bulk update: Test multi-word gloss again

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>draft evasion V2</gloss>
+<gloss>draft evasion V3</gloss>