All the JEs

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<gloss>white-collar worker</gloss>

gg5

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<gloss>office worker</gloss>

G n-grams 1289717

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -8,0 +10 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

daij

I don't think this is hum.

@@ -18 +17,0 @@
-<misc>&hum;</misc>

Consistency with 1307630 and the other sibling entries

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<gloss>older brother</gloss>
@@ -20 +20,0 @@
-<gloss>older brother</gloss>

GG5, etc.

Both work equally well these days. In fact "older brother" is more common in WWW pages.

@@ -20,0 +20,1 @@
+<gloss>older brother</gloss>

Bulk update n-adv to n,adv
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -43 +43,2 @@
-<pos>&n-adv;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>

Bulk update n-adv to n,adv
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -37 +37,2 @@
-<pos>&n-adv;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>

Fixed the sentences, sort-of. There are 518...

Moving less frequently used senses down.

@@ -33,5 +32,0 @@
-<gloss>after one's death</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -40,7 +34,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<gloss>descendant</gloss>
-<gloss>successor</gloss>
-<gloss>heir</gloss>
@@ -60,0 +49,12 @@
+<gloss>descendant</gloss>
+<gloss>successor</gloss>
+<gloss>heir</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<gloss>after one's death</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

Seems OK.

I think it was to distinguish it from 姉さん.

I don't believe this is hum.

@@ -21 +20,0 @@
-<misc>&hum;</misc>

汁粉	97118
しるこ	160089

お汁粉	64325
おしるこ	98160

汁粉屋	1328
しるこ屋	1579
しるこや	2323

@@ -12 +12,4 @@
-<gloss>sweet red-bean soup</gloss>
+<field>&food;</field>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>shiruko</gloss>
+<gloss>sweet red-bean soup with mochi</gloss>

https://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/word/en/触れる/#je-67373
    過去のことには触れてもらいたくない
    I don't want you to bring up the past.

@@ -37,0 +38 @@
+<gloss>to bring up</gloss>

Done.

reopen as a reminder for indexing as Jim mentions below

yeah, tough.  maybe "to place against", or something.  temp approve

瀬戸物	40168
せともの	27346
セトモノ	4490
瀬戸もの	448
せとモノ	No matches
せと物	117
http://www.mingei-okumura.com/fs/mingei/c/setohongyo
"そんな方にはめちゃくちゃお勧めです。
「瀬戸」、「瀬戸もの」って言葉がなんとなく
安い陶磁器の代名詞みたいになってしまった
そんな今だからこその「瀬戸の本業」。
日々、日々、使い続けたい器なんです。"

@@ -6,0 +7,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>瀬戸もの</keb>

gg5, prog

More glosses

@@ -18,0 +19,3 @@
+<gloss>porcelain</gloss>
+<gloss>china</gloss>
+<gloss>pottery</gloss>
@@ -20 +22,0 @@
-<gloss>china</gloss>

daijs, gg5, prog

@@ -16 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>to reveal something by washing the surface</gloss>
+<gloss>to reveal by washing the surface</gloss>
+<gloss>to expose by washing away dirt, earth, etc.</gloss>
@@ -20,0 +22 @@
+<gloss>to discover (by investigation)</gloss>
@@ -22 +24,7 @@
-<gloss>to reveal by investigation</gloss>
+<gloss>to find out</gloss>
+<gloss>to dig up</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5s;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>to start washing</gloss>

gg5

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>洗いだす</keb>
@@ -13,0 +16,5 @@
+<gloss>to reveal something by washing the surface</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5s;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
@@ -14,0 +22,1 @@
+<gloss>to reveal by investigation</gloss>

I don't think so.

@@ -20 +20 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">red bean soup made with azuki beans (style varies according to region)</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">red bean soup made with azuki beans</gloss>

Is the " (style varies according to region)" bit needed?

@@ -12,2 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>Well done!</gloss>
-<gloss>Bravo!</gloss>
+<gloss>well done!</gloss>
+<gloss>bravo!</gloss>
@@ -20 +20 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">red bean soup made with Azuki beans (style varies according to region)</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">red bean soup made with azuki beans (style varies according to region)</gloss>

jawiki: https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/ぜんざい

善哉	53221
ぜんざい	378330
善哉餅	38
ぜんざい餅	216

jawiki has it in kana and I've found it to be usually conservative in its use of kanji and okurigana.

@@ -16,0 +17,2 @@
+<field>&food;</field>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

OK.

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">red bean soup made with Azuki beans (varies according to region, e.g. cold in Okinawa)</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">red bean soup made with Azuki beans (style varies according to region)</gloss>

@@ -28 +28 @@
-<gloss>funnel shaped object</gloss>
+<gloss>funnel-shaped object</gloss>

I think the gloss is fine without "any".

@@ -28 +28 @@
-<gloss>any funnel shaped object</gloss>
+<gloss>funnel shaped object</gloss>

如何様師	128
いかさま師	13334

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>如何様師</keb>
+<keb>いかさま師</keb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<keb>いかさま師</keb>
+<keb>如何様師</keb>

gg5, prog

I don't think we need "vanquished".

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<gloss>defeated person</gloss>
@@ -18 +18,0 @@
-<gloss>vanquished</gloss>

chuujiten; gakken; wisdom J-E; daijr J-E

Most of my J-E's lead with "a loser".

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<gloss>loser</gloss>
@@ -18 +18,0 @@
-<gloss>loser</gloss>

I think this is the fork...

Found refs suggesting that it's not restricted to あちら, never mind

@@ -43 +42,0 @@
-<stagr>あちら</stagr>
@@ -46 +45 @@
-<s_inf>someone physically distant from both speaker and listener, or someone not present but known by both speaker and listener</s_inf>
+<s_inf>someone physically distant from both speaker and listener, or someone not present but known by both speaker and listener. あちら is polite</s_inf>

wisdom, daijs

aligning.
only あちら can be used for a third person, same as with こちら. described in daijs

@@ -30 +30,2 @@
-<gloss>that way (direction distant from both speaker and listener)</gloss>
+<s_inf>direction distant from both speaker and listener</s_inf>
+<gloss>that way</gloss>
@@ -37,2 +38,9 @@
-<gloss>that one (something physically distant from both speaker and listener, or something not visible but known by both speaker and listener)</gloss>
-<gloss>that</gloss>
+<s_inf>something physically distant from both speaker and listener, or something not visible but known by both speaker and listener</s_inf>
+<gloss>that (one)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<stagr>あちら</stagr>
+<pos>&pn;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<s_inf>someone physically distant from both speaker and listener, or someone not present but known by both speaker and listener</s_inf>
+<gloss>that person</gloss>
@@ -43,7 +51,2 @@
-<s_inf>あちら is polite</s_inf>
-<gloss>that person (someone physically distant from both speaker and listener, or someone not present but known by both speaker and listener)</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&pn;</pos>
-<misc>&uk;</misc>
-<gloss>there (place distant from both speaker and listener)</gloss>
+<s_inf>place distant from both speaker and listener</s_inf>
+<gloss>there</gloss>

@@ -26,3 +26,3 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1189360">何方・どちら・1</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1004500">此方・こちら・1</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1006780">其方・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1004500">こちら・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1006780">そちら・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1189360">どちら・1</xref>
@@ -35,0 +36 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -40,0 +42 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -45,0 +48 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

https://hinative.com/ja/questions/10393
Q:彼方の読み方はいくつがありますか？
A:かなた
だけだと思います。
A:確かに3つありますね！知らなかった。笑
彼方と書いてあったら、かなたと読む方が多いと思います。
A: かなた、と読むイメージしかなかったです

@@ -6,3 +6 @@
-<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>
-<ke_pri>news2</ke_pri>
-<ke_pri>nf28</ke_pri>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

Here goes....

Bringing changes over from fork. Apologies for all the edits.

@@ -45 +44,0 @@
-<stagr>あちら</stagr>
@@ -48 +47 @@
-<s_inf>someone physically distant from both speaker and listener, or someone not present but known by both speaker and listener</s_inf>
+<s_inf>someone physically distant from both speaker and listener, or someone not present but known by both speaker and listener. あちら is polite</s_inf>

@@ -32,0 +33 @@
+<gloss>that direction</gloss>

wisdom, daijs

aligning.
only あちら can be used for a third person, same as with こちら. described in daijs

@@ -30 +30,2 @@
-<gloss>that way (direction distant from both speaker and listener)</gloss>
+<s_inf>direction distant from both speaker and listener</s_inf>
+<gloss>that way</gloss>
@@ -37,2 +38,9 @@
-<gloss>that one (something physically distant from both speaker and listener, or something not visible but known by both speaker and listener)</gloss>
-<gloss>that</gloss>
+<s_inf>something physically distant from both speaker and listener, or something not visible but known by both speaker and listener</s_inf>
+<gloss>that (one)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<stagr>あちら</stagr>
+<pos>&pn;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<s_inf>someone physically distant from both speaker and listener, or someone not present but known by both speaker and listener</s_inf>
+<gloss>that person</gloss>
@@ -43,7 +51,2 @@
-<s_inf>あちら is polite</s_inf>
-<gloss>that person (someone physically distant from both speaker and listener, or someone not present but known by both speaker and listener)</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&pn;</pos>
-<misc>&uk;</misc>
-<gloss>there (place distant from both speaker and listener)</gloss>
+<s_inf>place distant from both speaker and listener</s_inf>
+<gloss>there</gloss>

I think it was to contrast with 妹さん.

I don't believe this is hum.

@@ -18 +17,0 @@
-<misc>&hum;</misc>

I'm not seeing any adj-no examples in the refs or top n-gram terms for 仮説の.

@@ -14 +13,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

GG5, etc.

fictional?

@@ -17 +17,2 @@
-<gloss>fictional</gloss>
+<gloss>assumption</gloss>
+<gloss>tentative theory</gloss>

We accept 50%+ for [uk].

All these stats were given earlier, actually:

ちりばめた	85914	49.2%
散りばめた	88672	50.8% <- kanji wins

ちりばめ	397259	49.6%
散りばめ	403200	50.4% <- kanji wins

Dictionary form is more likely kanji, but dictionary form isn't common.
散りばめる	8731	47.5%
ちりばめる	9668	52.5% <- kana wins

Removed [uk].  What is our official cutoff for [uk] by the way?  

This is very close to a 50/50 split, so probably not controversial to remove here (encountered myself in song lyrics with kanji).

But it now occurs to me that I've been treating it as 50%, and that has always appeared to me to be the practice here.

I've never participated in a discussion on this question, but it seems like [uk] should imply kana-only should be well above 50%.  "Usually" seems quite a bit stronger to me than "more often than not". Or, phrased differently, it seems like if you are highly likely to encounter the kanji form, and if you wouldn't look odd using the kanji form, then [uk] might be misleading.

Incidentally (reading earlier comments), this was also a "star studded sky"-type context.

====

I googled "what percent is usually".  Google returns:
https://grammar.reverso.net/frequency/
always	100 percent of the time (or almost 100%).
usually	about 80 percent of the time.  <----- 80%, seems close to my intuition
often	more than half of the time.
sometimes less than half of the time.
rarely	about 20 percent of the time.
never	at no time.

Whatever our intentions might be, or might have been, it seems reasonable to expect that an average reader who sees "usually kana" on a term is going to expect something in the 80%+ range, not 50.01%+.

@@ -17 +16,0 @@
-<misc>&uk;</misc>

散りばめる is in 中辞典 too.
Meikyo: 表記「散りばめる」と書くのは標準的でない。

Despite being relatively rare, 鏤める is the only kanji form listed in most refs. I only see 散りばめる in daijs

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 散りばめる │   8,731 │ 45.8% │
│ 鏤める　　 │     669 │  3.5% │
│ ちりばめる │   9,668 │ 50.7% │
├─ーーーーー─┼─────────┼───────┤
│ 散りばめ　 │ 403,200 │ 49.7% │
│ 鏤め　　　 │  11,223 │  1.4% │
│ 散り嵌め　 │      51 │  0.3% │
│ ちりばめ　 │ 397,259 │ 48.9% │
╰─ーーーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

@@ -20,2 +20,2 @@
-<gloss>to enchase (a thing) with</gloss>
-<gloss>to mount (gem)</gloss>
+<gloss>to enchase (something) with</gloss>
+<gloss>to mount (gems)</gloss>

Yes, I should have left that in.

当て外れ	2011
あて外れ	207
当てはずれ	901

I'm happy staying with "no".

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<keb>あて外れ</keb>
+<keb>当てはずれ</keb>
@@ -11 +11 @@
-<keb>当てはずれ</keb>
+<keb>あて外れ</keb>

koj
見込みや期待がはずれること。「―の結果」

adj-no seems fine to me?

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

gg5, daij, etc.
当て外れ	        2011
当て外れな	141
当て外れの	292

None of the refs have this as an adjective.
I don't think the x-ref is necessary.

@@ -18,3 +17,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="1856780">当てが外れる</xref>

gg5, prog

@@ -21,0 +22 @@
+<gloss>letdown</gloss>

gg5

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>infancy</gloss>

gg5, Wisdom

@@ -15 +15,3 @@
-<gloss>speaking of</gloss>
+<gloss>now that you mention it</gloss>
+<gloss>come to think of it</gloss>
+<gloss>that reminds me</gloss>
@@ -17,2 +19 @@
-<gloss>come to think of it</gloss>
-<gloss>now that you mention it</gloss>
+<gloss>speaking of which</gloss>

tried to improve it

@@ -15,5 +15,4 @@
-<gloss>which reminds me ...</gloss>
-<gloss>come to think of it ...</gloss>
-<gloss>now that you mention it ...</gloss>
-<gloss>on that subject ...</gloss>
-<gloss>so, if you say ...</gloss>
+<gloss>speaking of</gloss>
+<gloss>on that subject</gloss>
+<gloss>come to think of it</gloss>
+<gloss>now that you mention it</gloss>

prog
ジャーンと	4948
ジャーンと鳴る	56
じゃーんと鳴る	No matches

I'm not convinced about じゃむ either. Never seen or heard it.
The "clash" sense isn't a noun. Changing it to adv-to.
I think the reading restriction is correct and we should swap the order of the senses.

@@ -16,9 +15,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>じゃむ</reb>
-</r_ele>
-<sense>
-<stagr>ジャーン</stagr>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>clash</gloss>
-<gloss>bang</gloss>
-</sense>
@@ -30,2 +21,9 @@
-<gloss>tada!</gloss>
-<gloss>voilà</gloss>
+<gloss>voilà!</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<stagr>ジャーン</stagr>
+<pos>&adv-to;</pos>
+<misc>&on-mim;</misc>
+<gloss>clash</gloss>
+<gloss>crash</gloss>
+<gloss>bang</gloss>

No response for a week. Closing.

Splitting off the じゃじゃーん versions, and adding in Nicolas' proposed じゃん & じゃむ. I'm not convinced about じゃむ.
Also should sense 1 be restricted like that? Is the sense order appropriate?

@@ -8,3 +7,0 @@
-<reb>じゃじゃーん</reb>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
@@ -14 +11,7 @@
-<reb>ジャジャーン</reb>
+<reb>じゃん</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ジャン</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>じゃむ</reb>
@@ -23,0 +27 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2844827">じゃじゃーん</xref>

じゃじゃーん	40913
じゃじゃん	14699
じゃあじゃん	115
ジャジャーン	8742
ジャジャン	9630

"jaan" and "jajan" should probably be two different entries. And Nicolas じゃん suggestion should maybe be merged into the "jaan"

GG5 (indexed subentry)
著作権侵害訴訟	2904

著作権+侵害+訴訟. May as well stay.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&law;</field>

not needed

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1286060">告白・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1286060">告白・2</xref>

The note seems unnecessary given the x-ref.

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1286060">告白・2</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1286060">告白・1</xref>
@@ -19 +18,0 @@
-<s_inf>from 告白する</s_inf>

As Robin said last year, the "ask out" is probably not necessary. I'll align 告白[2].

@@ -21 +21 @@
-<gloss>to profess one's feelings and ask (somebody) to date you</gloss>
+<gloss>to profess one's feelings</gloss>

it's like a proposal, really, only you're 
proposing "couplehood" rather than 
marriage.
告白 sense should be aligned w whatever 
this ends up as

@@ -20 +20,2 @@
-<gloss>to confess (one's love)</gloss>
+<gloss>to confess one's love</gloss>
+<gloss>to profess one's feelings and ask (somebody) to date you</gloss>

https://www.dictionary.com/browse/hotelman

i agree.  also, this isn't wasei.  sense 2 is the original from english.  sense 1 is japanese usage

@@ -9,3 +9 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2837555">ホテリエ・2</xref>
-<lsource ls_wasei="y">hotel man</lsource>
-<gloss>(male) hotel worker</gloss>
+<gloss>hotel worker</gloss>
@@ -15,2 +13,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2837555">ホテリエ・1</xref>
-<gloss>(male) hotelier</gloss>
+<s_inf>orig. meaning</s_inf>
+<gloss>hotelman</gloss>
@@ -17,0 +16 @@
+<gloss>hotelier</gloss>

https://www.jikei-hospitality.ac.jp/column/column_h01.php

Any reference? My impression was that the term was used for female hotel employees too. The Daijirin entry for ホテルマン doesn't mention gender, and Googling for it brings up plenty of pictures of female staff.

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<gloss>hotel worker</gloss>
+<gloss>(male) hotel worker</gloss>
@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>hotelier</gloss>
+<gloss>(male) hotelier</gloss>

wiki

上げまん	223
上げマン	311
あげまん	28916
あげマン	544
アゲマン	2186

@@ -25,0 +26 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

oops.  i also removed the etymological note as per marcus because there wasn't one given on 下げまん and because the "possibly" seemed too uncertain to be worth recording (and with little actual merit re usefulness)

see comments at 下げまん

@@ -3,0 +4,6 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>上げまん</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>上げマン</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -5,0 +12,5 @@
+<re_restr>上げまん</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>あげマン</reb>
+<re_restr>上げマン</re_restr>
@@ -9,3 +20 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>あげマン</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>
@@ -14,0 +24 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2842701">下げまん</xref>
@@ -16 +25,0 @@
-<s_inf>poss. from あげ間</s_inf>

gg5: 〔…じゃないかの意〕なかなかいいじゃん.　Pretty good, eh?
daijs: 俗に、やや強く断定する意を表す。…ではないか。「そんなの簡単じゃん」
koj: 相手に同意や確認を求める意を表す。「いかしてる―」「そんなことどうでもいい―」

It's a 終助詞 in koj and daijs.
I don't think the meaning has shifted that much.
In speech, this wouldn't usually be translated; you'd just use intonation.

@@ -9 +9 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2819990">じゃ無いか・じゃないか・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2819990">じゃないか・1</xref>
@@ -11,3 +11,5 @@
-<s_inf>used to express assertion, disagreement; orig. from じゃない か</s_inf>
-<gloss>look</gloss>
-<gloss>like I said</gloss>
+<s_inf>used to state something assertively; orig. from じゃないか</s_inf>
+<gloss>isn't it?</gloss>
+<gloss>don't you think?</gloss>
+<gloss>right?</gloss>
+<gloss>surely</gloss>
@@ -15 +16,0 @@
-<gloss>but what about ...</gloss>

daijs

I think じゃないかis the etymology but that 
the meaning has shifted considerably. it's 
a particle like "よ" or よね". also it's 
kanto dialect.

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<pos>&prt;</pos>
@@ -11,2 +11,5 @@
-<s_inf>contraction of じゃないか</s_inf>
-<gloss>isn't it</gloss>
+<s_inf>used to express assertion, disagreement; orig. from じゃない か</s_inf>
+<gloss>look</gloss>
+<gloss>like I said</gloss>
+<gloss>come on</gloss>
+<gloss>but what about ...</gloss>

Daijr, Koj, GG5

All refs say it's from じゃないか. 
GG5 and ルミナス have it as "-じゃん", and it's certainly almost always clause/sentence-ending. Should it be tagged as "suf" as well?
I don't think the じゃん/ta-da proposal should be merged here.

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2819990">じゃ無いか・じゃないか・1</xref>
@@ -10 +11 @@
-<s_inf>contraction of じゃない</s_inf>
+<s_inf>contraction of じゃないか</s_inf>

Daijirin has two senses - the literal and the idiomatic.

daij

daijs says this means to fool somebody, while all the entries on 煙幕 on kotobank say it's just a literal smokescreen.

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<misc>&id;</misc>
@@ -13,0 +15,2 @@
+<gloss>to put up a false front</gloss>
+<gloss>to purposely mislead</gloss>

@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@
+<pos>&v5r;</pos>

Entry created

@@ -19,0 +20 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2005620">イケメン</xref>
@@ -23 +24 @@
-<s_inf>kanji "pun" on イケめん</s_inf>
+<s_inf>kanji "pun" on イケメン</s_inf>

@@ -21 +21 @@
-<misc>&sl;</misc>
+<misc>&net-sl;</misc>

Thank you for the correction, but the イケメン you're 
thinking of is a separate entry (id 1156496); this is a 
kanji pun on that word (and the gloss is correct). I 
don't know what dictionary app you're using but since 
this is tagged obsc, I assume most should display the 
other イケメン before this one.

@@ -21 +20,0 @@
-<xref type="see">イケめん</xref>
@@ -25 +24,2 @@
-<gloss>good-looking guy</gloss>
+<s_inf>kanji "pun" on イケめん</s_inf>
+<gloss>exceptionally ugly man</gloss>

I found this error in the Japanese App for Android. I have asked several of my Japanese friends, and everybody confirmed that イケめん stands for a very good-looking guy, not an exceptionally ugly one.

Cheers and thanks for the otherwise awesome database!

@@ -21 +21 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2005620">イケめん</xref>
+<xref type="see">イケめん</xref>
@@ -25 +25 @@
-<gloss>exceptionally ugly man</gloss>
+<gloss>good-looking guy</gloss>

I think the glosses such as "of course/it figures" cover it.

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<s_inf>expression one says when what is expected comes</s_inf>

The note.

the note or the entry?

don't think it's needed at all.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<s_inf>expression one says when what is expected comes</s_inf>
@@ -18 +18,0 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">expression one says when what is expected comes</gloss>

these can't be merged because they fail 2/3.  split

@@ -7,3 +7,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>そら来た</keb>
-</k_ele>
@@ -12,5 +9,0 @@
-<re_restr>それ来た</re_restr>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>そらきた</reb>
-<re_restr>そら来た</re_restr>
@@ -26,1 +18,1 @@
-<gloss>expression one says when what is expected comes</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">expression one says when what is expected comes</gloss>

See 1836000.

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<s_inf>epistolary style referring to a male who is one's equal or superior</s_inf>
+<s_inf>used in letters to address a male friend or superior</s_inf>
@@ -23 +23 @@
-<s_inf>epistolary style referring to a male who is one's equal or superior</s_inf>
+<s_inf>used in letters after the name of a male friend or superior</s_inf>

Pity that note can't be trimmed.

all dicts list the brother sense as being first except meikyo, which has *only* the pn and suf senses.  it lists the brother sense as （造）.  all sources have pn and suf as being different senses, which i think makes sense given that they have to be glossed quite differently in english

listing the brother sense last, as a mixture of meikyo and the other approaches seems reasonable.  there's no way that anyone is reading the noun 兄 as けい without furigana

@@ -10,0 +11,17 @@
+<pos>&pn;</pos>
+<misc>&fam;</misc>
+<misc>&hon;</misc>
+<misc>&male;</misc>
+<s_inf>epistolary style referring to a male who is one's equal or superior</s_inf>
+<gloss>you</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&suf;</pos>
+<misc>&fam;</misc>
+<misc>&hon;</misc>
+<misc>&male;</misc>
+<s_inf>epistolary style referring to a male who is one's equal or superior</s_inf>
+<gloss>Mr</gloss>
+<gloss>Mister</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
@@ -12 +28,0 @@
-<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
@@ -13,0 +30 @@
+<s_inf>orig. meaning</s_inf>
@@ -17,8 +33,0 @@
-<sense>
-<pos>&pn;</pos>
-<misc>&fam;</misc>
-<misc>&male;</misc>
-<gloss>pronoun or suffix used in reference to an older brother figure</gloss>
-<gloss>Mister</gloss>
-<gloss>Mr</gloss>
-</sense>

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>older brother</gloss>

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
@@ -13 +13,0 @@
-<misc>&obsc;</misc>

Entry created

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<gloss>elder brother</gloss>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1001830">お兄さん</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1001830">お兄さん・1</xref>

Sigh. OK.

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<misc>&fam;</misc>

I think the n-suf sense is worth recording 
(also for ねえ）. it's not always followed 
by さん when used like that, suffixed to a 
name e.g. ”隆兄” takashinii

GG5: xrefs to 火遊び, which has two senses
Daijirin: 火をおもちゃにすること。火遊び。
Daijisen: 火をもてあそぶこと。火遊び。(Koj and Nikk are the same)

The point here is whether all the senses of 火遊び apply, or just the first. All the )few) examples I can find are for the literal snese.

@@ -15 +14,0 @@
-<gloss>flirting</gloss>

Entry created

gg5, daij, meikyo
さばき	377393
捌き	190389
足さばき	20711
足捌き	9034

Usually kana.

@@ -13,2 +13,5 @@
-<gloss>handling (e.g. knife, reins, etc.)</gloss>
-<gloss>... work (e.g. footwork)</gloss>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>handling (e.g. knife, reins)</gloss>
+<gloss>control</gloss>
+<gloss>use</gloss>
+<gloss>-work (e.g. footwork)</gloss>
@@ -18,0 +22,3 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>dealing with (e.g. customers)</gloss>
+<gloss>management</gloss>

@@ -13,1 +13,1 @@
-<gloss>handling (e.g. of a knife, of reins)</gloss>
+<gloss>handling (e.g. knife, reins, etc.)</gloss>

GG5 daijr koj

Seen 〜捌き pretty frequently meaning various “handling, …work” (handling the wheel of a car, riding a horse, etc.).
BTW, also suggesting removing 捌き from 1295920 (distinct meaning); see discussion there.

As with それ来た.

@@ -14 +13,0 @@
-<s_inf>expression one says when what is expected comes</s_inf>

I don't think it's needed, though. but if we keep it, it's a note, not an expl.

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<s_inf>expression one says when what is expected comes</s_inf>
@@ -20 +20,0 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">expression one says when what is expected comes</gloss>

I've been meaning to do that.

oops

@@ -11,1 +11,1 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>

200k google, 4500 bing.

split off of amendment to それ来た (fails 2/3)

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<gloss>toastie</gloss>

I see "toasted sandwich" gets more Google hits.

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>toasted sandwich</gloss>
@@ -14 +14,0 @@
-<gloss>toasted sandwich</gloss>

I think they would normally be called "toasted sandwiches" in Australia, at least. I realise that a hot sandwich may be an untoasted sandwich with a hot filling, but almost all the Google Images show toasted bread.
http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/ホットサンド

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>toasted sandwich</gloss>

I think Robin's point about usage like 本当のことを言えば is quite valid.  Either we drop it, or have a "usual meaning" sense. Best dropped in that case.

そんなこと言えば	726

also as そういえば to be fair. and 
constructions like そんなこと言えば, are 
possible too.
(I don't feel strongly about this entry 
and Robin might be right it could be 
confusing, I don't know)

This meaning of 言えば is always used with と. A lot of the time, 言えば simply means "if (one) says" (e.g. 本当のことを言えば). If anything, this entry could be confusing. I don't see a reason for keeping it.

と言えば	5587609
言えば	13055041
と言えなくもない	53717
言えなくもない	68489
と言えど	81860
言えど	98137

I've sat on the fence on this for a long time, as I can see both positions are valid. I think I'll leave it in:
- it is a Daijirin entry (although that just points to と言えば)
- the n-grams seem to be saying that 言えば gets a lot of use without the と, certainly in contrast with the other と言え... expressions.

We actually include the と for と言う expressions (See と言うと, と言うのは, と言うことは, と言うのも, etc.) All my refs (kokugos, JEs, grammar dictionaries) do the same. I think we can safely delete this. It doesn't serve any purpose as long as we have a と言えば entry.

digital daijs gives lsrc=fre

i'm not sure ホテリア is worth recording.  ホテリア seems to correspond to a JAL-related service called hoterea.  ホテリアー is a korean drama.

it's not clear how much usage there is as a common noun.  see also Robin's comment earlier regarding ngrams.

@@ -7,3 +6,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>ホテリア</reb>
-</r_ele>
@@ -11,0 +9 @@
+<lsource xml:lang="fre">hôtelier</lsource>

Better term.

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<gloss>hotel employee</gloss>
+<gloss>hotel worker</gloss>

ホテリアー	102744
ホテリア	10979

Probably

G n-grams:
ホテリエになりたい	438
ホテリアになりたい	No matches
daijs (sense 2): "ホテルの従業員。"
daijr: "日本では，広くホテルで働く人もさす"

I think the high n-gram counts for ホテリア are because of a South Korean drama called "ホテリアー".
Added sense.

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<reb>ホテリア</reb>
+<reb>ホテリエ</reb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>ホテリエ</reb>
+<reb>ホテリア</reb>
@@ -12,0 +13,6 @@
+<gloss>hotelkeeper</gloss>
+<gloss>hotel manager</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>hotel employee</gloss>

edit to 触れる has been approved

meikyo
...
 他下一
(1) 手・指などの体の部分を他の物に軽く接触させる。
「バラのとげに指を━」
「展示品には手を━・れないでください」
「杯に口を━」

perhaps better handled by adding the missing transitive sense to ふれる?  (or changing sense 1 to vi,vt)

手を触れる	19120
手を触れて	12617
に手を触れる	9295
に手を触れて	5853
Several GG5 and Eijiro examples, 6 Tanaka sentences.
手で触れる	21005
手で触れて	12319

An odd one. 触れる is intransitive, and this expression is making a sort-of intransitive clause using an を, as in "彼は彼女の肩に手を触れた。 He touched her on the shoulder."  There's also 手で触れる which seems to mean much the same.
Anyway, since it doesn't seem to sit comfortably in the usual basic grammar rules, I'm suggesting adding it.

I agree.

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<gloss>video game for the purpose of masturbation</gloss>
+<gloss>erotic video game made for the purpose of masturbation</gloss>

I think we just need one or the other. Having “porn game” and “game to assist masturbation” seems a little redundant.

@@ -14,2 +14 @@
-<gloss>adul</gloss>
-<gloss>porn game</gloss>
+<gloss>video game for the purpose of masturbation</gloss>

"game to assist masturbation" is surely too literal?

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<gloss>game to assist masturbation</gloss>
+<gloss>adul</gloss>

Nice to have some references finally. I see the Jitsuyo one is quite old.

@@ -11,0 +12,3 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1478190">抜く・14</xref>
+<misc>&sl;</misc>
+<gloss>game to assist masturbation</gloss>

https://dic.pixiv.net/a/抜きゲー
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/抜きゲー
https://www.weblio.jp/content/抜きゲー

reviving this one. it's a real term

Thank you.

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>ちかくのしんせきよりちかくのたにん</reb>
+<reb>とおくのしんせきよりちかくのたにん</reb>

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2416740">遠くの親類より近くの他人・とおくのしんるいよりちかくのたにん</xref>

遠くの親類より	1328 (already an entry, copied gloss from there)
遠くの一家	29
遠くの親戚より	4766

Add POS to proverbs
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<pos>&v5r;</pos>

Thank you.

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>るりもはりもてらせわかる</reb>
+<reb>るりもはりもてらせばわかる</reb>

瑠璃も玻璃も	955
daijr nikk

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/かるた#古典的ないろはかる

Thanks.

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>横槌で庭掃く</keb>
+<keb>横槌で庭を掃く</keb>

daijr nikk
0 ngrams

Thanks.

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>いしょくじょうごもちくらい</reb>
+<reb>たいしょくじょうごもちくらい</reb>

daijr
大食上戸餅食らい	30
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/かるた#古典的ないろはかるた

Crazy I made this many mistakes. Thanks.

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>しやくしではらをきる</reb>
+<reb>しゃくしではらをきる</reb>

daij
various versions mentioned/being entries in the kokugo:
連木で腹切る	49
連木で腹を切る	60
杓子で腹を切る	No matches
擂り粉木で腹を切る	No matches
擂り粉木で芋を盛る	52

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/かるた#古典的ないろはかるた

https://www.dictionary.com/browse/playback-head

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<gloss>playback head</gloss>

Not just computing.

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<field>&engr;</field>

https://kotobank.jp/word/再生ヘッド-68006

せめてもの	193054
せめても	199351

Looks good. I suggest we keep せめてもの and align it with sense 2 (those n-gram counts are instructive.)

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2610770">せめてもの</xref>

gg5, prog, daij

OK.
It's an adverb in the kokugos. No need for exp.
せめて is an awkward one to translate because it can mean "at least" or "at most" depending on whether the thing/quantity/action/etc. is better or worse than the ideal.
せめて2000円なら買うのだが - 2000 yen is the most I'm willing to pay.
せめて2000円なら売るのだが - I would take 2000 yen, at the very least.
I don't know if we want to keep the せめてもの entry (or just have an adj-no sense here) but I propose these glosses.

@@ -8,2 +8 @@
-<pos>&exp;</pos>
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
@@ -12,2 +11,11 @@
-<gloss>bare minimum</gloss>
-<gloss>the least one can do</gloss>
+<gloss>at the very most</gloss>
+<gloss>as a bare minimum</gloss>
+<gloss>(even if it's) just</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<gloss>minimum</gloss>
+<gloss>(very) least</gloss>
+<gloss>at least some (comfort, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>only (consolation, saving grace, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>sole</gloss>

I agree with Rene and the previous anonymous contributor. It's not exclusively せめてもの - I saw 2 せめても without the の among the 10 or so 
most recent tweets containing the phrase. It should prob have an adv tag/sense too.

we might want to keep せめても as adj-no and toss せめてもの.  but it's probably harmless to have both... daijr has both

Not always:
「私は、タオと言います。
ヤンの父がわりをしております。
・・・あれは、まだヤンが生まれて
すぐの、私が旅の道具屋をしていたころでした。
私が、闇の魔物に襲われたその時
ヤンの父が助けてくれたのです・・・
・・・ヤンの父は私のかわりに・・・
せめてもと思い、ヤン母子の世話を
しているんですが・・・」

It's a fine line. I think this one just makes it, and the part in parentheses certainly helps.

I also don't know if this should be an entry or not, but if it's an entry, I don't think it should have an expl - again, it's not a Japanese 
concept, jmdict is not a general encyclopedia but a wa-ei dictionary, if people want full information about astronomical or philosophical 
concepts, etc. they can find those in better-updated encyclopedic entries. This is also what the actual editorial policy suggests: 
"where the English meaning is an obscure technical term, add a short explanation in lay terms after it in parentheses. Do not add such 
explanations where the English meaning should be clear to a literate user (this is not an English dictionary.)"

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>zoo hypothesis</gloss>
+<gloss>zoo hypothesis (theory on why humanity has had no contact with extraterrestrial life)</gloss>

and the japanese wiki page has no japanese references at all, and it was likely constructed simply by someone translating the english page.

i don't really have a problem with this going in, but if it does, i think there should be some kind of [expl] gloss on there.  it's pretty obvious that 動物園仮説 translates literally to "zoo hypothesis", so if you're looking this up in a J-E dictionary, it's probably because you have no idea what the "zoo hypothesis" is.  (i didn't.)

G n-grams: 133
~5000 googits

Not in any of my refs. Not sure we need it.

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/動物園仮説

gakken katakana:
ゴルディオスの結び目とも．

@@ -6,0 +7,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ゴルディオスの結び目</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -8,0 +12,5 @@
+<re_restr>ゴルディアスの結び目</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ゴルディオスのむすびめ</reb>
+<re_restr>ゴルディオスの結び目</re_restr>
@@ -10,0 +19 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
@@ -12 +21 @@
-<gloss>gordian knot</gloss>
+<gloss>Gordian knot</gloss>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/ゴルディアスの結び目

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2390720">木探索・きたんさく</xref>

0 ngrams (but a number of google hits)

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>{comp} monte carlo tree search</gloss>
+<field>&comp;</field>
+<gloss>Monte Carlo tree search</gloss>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/モンテカルロ木探索

Simpler.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>printed copy (of a written work, as opposed to digital)</gloss>
+<gloss>printed edition (as opposed to digital)</gloss>

https://lunarboyland.com/category2/
google hits

冊子版	68097

烏の足跡	121

Hi Jim. Idioms like these are welcome. A short translation leading is best, followed if necessary by a contextual comment in parentheses or an "[expl]" gloss.

Hi James, I would love to see more idiom entry suggestions from you (though I'm most likely not the person who will spend time vetting them). 
Also I agree us editors can be a little hostile to imperfectly sourced/formatted entry suggestions sometimes, which I think is unfortunate, but I do 
hope it doesn't put you or others off from contributing to the project.

Hi.  It's been a while, but as I recall, the problem was not "too many" fish names, it was that they were submitted in a style that was inconsistent with our regular practice.  i.e., IIRC, all possible names for a fish were submitted as a single entry, even if they had different etymological origins.  (e.g., Katakana from English was merged together with names that were clearly Japanese in origin.)  I also would not characterize a disagreement as an "attack".

For this entry, I'm not sure how best to clarify that it means wrinkles as opposed to literal crow's feet.  It could be handled as an expl gloss, or as parenthesized info.

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
@@ -12 +12,0 @@
-<pos>&exp;</pos>
@@ -14 +14 @@
-<gloss>crow's feet, wrinkles at the outer corner of the eye</gloss>
+<gloss>crow's feet (wrinkles)</gloss>

Kodansha's Dictionary of Basic Japanese Idioms

Idioms might be a rich hunting ground for additions to the dictionary, but I hesitate to do anything after being attacked for entering "too many" fish names.

looking at google, the yokai sense seems to dominate.
(a sense-wide lit might be helpful here)

@@ -11,0 +12,5 @@
+<gloss>makuragaeshi</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">monster that flips pillows over at night</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -19,5 +23,0 @@
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>makuragaeshi</gloss>
-<gloss g_type="expl">monster that flips pillows over at night</gloss>
-</sense>

Daijr has much the same.

@@ -11,0 +12,9 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1521320">北枕・1</xref>
+<gloss>changing a pillow position (esp. for a dead body)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>acrobatic routine involving multiple wooden pillows</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>

the yokai sense is in daijs+ while regular 
daijs has this:
１ 枕の向きを変えること。特に、人が死んだとき、北
枕に変えること。
２ 木枕を多く重ねて手でささげ、自由にもてあそぶ曲
芸。

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/枕返し
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Makuragaeshi

メンタリスト	544
JLD

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/メンタリスト_(舞台芸術)

OK, leave it for now.

I'll close this now to lock in the entry and shorten the queue, then reopen it for a while if we want to consider it further.
I have extended the text at https://www.edrdg.org/wiki/index.php/Editorial_policy#Old_and_Rarely_Used_Terms to reflect some of this discussion, especially Rene's enumeration.

I think there's an issue with lumping in Meiji-era words with 8th century words, which would be what we're doing if we call them all 
[arch]. 現代日本語, modern Japanese, is generally defined to begin with the Meiji period. But it's not that I mind calling Meiji words 
"arch" - other dictionaries use "archaic" to mean "old-fashioned" and "obsolete" to mean words that are not in use at all. I think it's 
worthwhile to distinguish between modern Japanese and other older forms of the language.

I agree that the arch/obs distinction is unclear and that obs should be reserved for the category of words that Rene described.
While it's true that Meiji-era literature is still widely read, I think we should explore the option of extending the scope of the arch tag to include obsolete terms from this era.
The bakumatsu/Meiji cutoff is logical, but it can be difficult with the tools at our disposal to know whether a particular word was common at that time. Words don't just suddenly stop being used; it's a gradual process.
And even if a (now-obsolete) word *was* common in the Meiji era, is there an issue with describing it as "archaic"? Plenty of "archaic" words in English appear regularly in late 19th and early 20th century literature.

Closing.

I have proposed the merge of this with じゃーん, etc. This can be deleted/rejected if that's approved. Maybe someone can consider the じゃん as an abbreviation of じゃん拳.

They really say じゃむ, too? I don't think I've ever heard that and I'd like to see some evidence of it.
If not, this should prob. be merged with our other じゃん entry. (the same entry should probably also have a じゃん [abbr] for じゃんけん　(see 
顔じゃん, 足じゃん)
_
じゃじゃん is a related expression we should also have.

I often hear this on Instagram, when people show food they have just made.

not vs in daijs so I'll take it out.

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<pos>&vs;</pos>

合紙	6007
daijs
https://hirameki.noge-printing.jp/aishi-paper_191107/
合紙と書いて「あいし」「ごうし」、 どちらも印刷用語です
https://www.shobundo.org/hanafuda.html
"黒色ボード紙とアート紙を合紙して新登場！！"

also read "あいし" apparently but meaning is different so should be a separate entry

じゃじゃーん	40913
じゃじゃん	14699
じゃあじゃん	115
ジャジャーン	8742
ジャジャン	9630

Split from 1984400.

花鬪	No matches
https://twitter.com/dousoshin/status/1734138708104978546
guy who wrote a book (vanity press) on them in Jp used these kanji, shame to not pick up on them.

@@ -5,0 +6,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>花鬪</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

花闘	110

ファトゥ	324
ファトウ	99

http://www.asahi-net.or.jp/~rp9h-tkhs/dg_hwato.htm (looks like a random geocities site, but it's managed by a playing card researcher)
"花闘（ファトウ）
　韓国の花札。" 

https://japanplayingcardmuseum.com/005-hanacarta-korea-hwatu/
"朝鮮の花札、「花闘」"

https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/VRQAAMXQ-9hRFx4m/s-l500.jpg
used on this hanafuda package from a Japanese producer (pre-war). possibly sold in occupied to Korea.

I guess not. Abbreviations are always a bit problematic.

I think "pie irons" are sth slightly 
different (though related) to ホットサンドメ
ーカー

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<gloss>pie iron</gloss>

ホットサンドメーカー	20000

サンド is a Japanese word so not wasei, I guess?

フリーアナ	6780
フリーアナウンサー	76775

かけマージャン	280
賭け麻雀	3681
賭けマージャン	1484
かけ麻雀	71
ＫＯＤ追加語彙

@@ -3,0 +4,6 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>賭け麻雀</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>賭けマージャン</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -9,0 +16 @@
+<gloss>playing mahjong for money</gloss>

in the news, "かけ" is obvious if you kbow 
it but seriously look at the かける entry

Cut-and-paste - bad character.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Vaughan Williams, Ralph (1872–1958)</gloss>
+<gloss>Vaughan Williams, Ralph (1872-1958)</gloss>

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vaughan_Williams_(surname)  "The best-known person with that surname, often referred to by it alone, is the English composer Ralph Vaughan Williams (1872–1958). "

@@ -11,2 +11,2 @@
-<misc>&surname;</misc>
-<gloss>Vaughan Williams</gloss>
+<misc>&person;</misc>
+<gloss>Vaughan Williams, Ralph (1872–1958)</gloss>

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<misc>&person;</misc>
+<misc>&surname;</misc>

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ヴォーン・ウィリアムズ</reb>