@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+<field>&food;</field>

May as well.

@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+<lsource xml:lang="eng">jug</lsource>

gg5, daij, koj

Splitting on source word. I think this sense is always ジョッキ.
Apparently this comes from a corruption of the English "jug". Do we want to mention that?

@@ -6,4 +5,0 @@
-<re_pri>gai1</re_pri>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>ジョッキー</reb>
@@ -18,5 +13,0 @@
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<s_inf>usually ジョッキー</s_inf>
-<gloss>jockey</gloss>
-</sense>

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<re_inf>&ik;</re_inf>

daijr

I think it's always electric.

@@ -20 +20 @@
-<gloss>fan (e.g. electric)</gloss>
+<gloss>(electric) fan</gloss>

gg5, prog, Wisdom

Please write comments to explain your amendments.
Splitting on source word.
All the JEs have "lover".

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<gloss>lover (of)</gloss>

@@ -16 +15,0 @@
-<gloss>lover</gloss>
@@ -22,4 +20,0 @@
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>fun</gloss>
-</sense>

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1070650">ステレオ・1</xref>

daijr: "音を単一系統で録音または再生する方式"
gg5: "モノラル放送　monaural broadcasting."

Not really a music term.

@@ -14 +13,0 @@
-<field>&music;</field>

as oposite to stereo

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<field>&music;</field>

gg5

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -13 +13,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -14,0 +15,2 @@
+<gloss>monophonic</gloss>
+<gloss>mono</gloss>

Splitting on source word.

@@ -16,4 +15,0 @@
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>writer</gloss>
-</sense>

I agree. In this case they work well.

@@ -18,3 +18,3 @@
-<gloss>nice</gloss>
-<gloss>score</gloss>
-<gloss>bingo</gloss>
+<gloss>nice!</gloss>
+<gloss>score!</gloss>
+<gloss>bingo!</gloss>

We often include exclamation marks on these sorts of interjections (but we're not consistent). GG5 does the same. Not sure which style I prefer but I do like that the exclamation marks make the PoS immediately obvious just from reading the glosses.

the exclamation mark is implied by the "int" itself

@@ -18,3 +18,3 @@
-<gloss>nice!</gloss>
-<gloss>score!</gloss>
-<gloss>bingo!</gloss>
+<gloss>nice</gloss>
+<gloss>score</gloss>
+<gloss>bingo</gloss>

daijr

Translations are my own.

@@ -15,0 +16,6 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&int;</pos>
+<gloss>nice!</gloss>
+<gloss>score!</gloss>
+<gloss>bingo!</gloss>
+</sense>

gg5, eij

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<gloss>fruit farm</gloss>

Comments below.

@@ -5,0 +6,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>我武者ら</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

gg5, prog
我武者羅	23922
我武者ら	651

Daijr has 我武者ら.

@@ -21,0 +22 @@
+<gloss>foolhardy</gloss>

Kanji Haitani list

Adding yoji tagAdding yoji tag
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<misc>&yoji;</misc>

Wisdom: "白線などで仕切られた駐車スペースまたは駐車場以外で駐車できるスペースは a parking space [spot, place]"

"parking place" isn't right.

@@ -19 +18,0 @@
-<gloss>parking place</gloss>

eij

@@ -21,0 +22 @@
+<gloss>parking garage</gloss>

@@ -19,0 +20,2 @@
+<gloss>car park</gloss>
+<gloss>carpark</gloss>

OK. Unmerged and Egypt add to  あい entry.

@@ -16,4 +15,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>あい</reb>
-<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>
-</r_ele>
@@ -24,5 +19,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<stagr>あい</stagr>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>one ten-billionth</gloss>

koj (あい【埃】): 埃及(エジプト)の略。

I want to add an "Egypt" sense but あい wouldn't be [ok]. I think あい should be a separate entry (as it was originally). I don't think we need the "dust" sense for あい. Daijs and koj don't have it.

GG5 and ルミナス use kana in examples. Not a 常用漢字.

@@ -21,0 +22 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

On second thought, [uk] is fine too. It could go either way imo.

埃　　	671460
ほこり	505300

@@ -22 +21,0 @@
-<misc>&uk;</misc>

gg5, prog, 中辞典

動気 is in daijs and nikk.

@@ -9 +8,0 @@
-<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>
@@ -16,2 +15,2 @@
-<gloss>palpitation (e.g. heart)</gloss>
-<gloss>pulsation</gloss>
+<gloss>palpitation (of the heart)</gloss>
+<gloss>pounding</gloss>
@@ -18,0 +18 @@
+<gloss>thumping</gloss>

GG5 daijr koj

* Fix order: 動悸 is *much* more common than 動気
* Mark 動気 as [iK]: no dict gives it

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>動気</keb>
+<keb>動悸</keb>
@@ -8 +8,2 @@
-<keb>動悸</keb>
+<keb>動気</keb>
+<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>

gg5, daij

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<gloss>treatment as a guest</gloss>

@@ -22,0 +23 @@
+<misc>&hist;</misc>

koj, daij, enc. of japan

@@ -5,1 +5,1 @@
-<keb>御達し</keb>
+<keb>お達し</keb>
@@ -8,1 +8,1 @@
-<keb>お達し</keb>
+<keb>御達し</keb>
@@ -21,0 +21,5 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2762690">御触書</xref>
+<gloss>Edo-period proclamation issued by the shogunate (or a daimyo, etc.) to the concerned parties</gloss>
+</sense>

@@ -15,0 +15,1 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1949200">達し</xref>

gg5, daij

I think one gloss is enough here.

@@ -16,2 +16 @@
-<gloss>castle of a daimyo</gloss>
-<gloss>castle of feudal lord</gloss>
+<gloss>castle of a feudal lord</gloss>

daij, koj, gg5, prog

Please provide references when making amendments.
The JEs all go with "short legs" but I agree that this is a better gloss. It's defined in the kokuogs as "足が短いこと" (short-leggedness), not "短い足" (short legs).

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -12,2 +13 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<gloss>short legs</gloss>
+<gloss>short-legged</gloss>

gg5

Not adj-no. You'd say ゲームのやりすぎ, not やりすぎのゲーム.

@@ -15 +14,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -16,0 +16,3 @@
+<gloss>overdoing (something)</gloss>
+<gloss>doing too much</gloss>
+<gloss>going too far</gloss>
@@ -18,2 +19,0 @@
-<gloss>going too far</gloss>
-<gloss>overdoing (something)</gloss>

https://news.yahoo.co.jp/pickup/6356997
マスク着けないと入店拒否、「やりすぎ」と批判受け対応改める　三井住友銀行の一部店舗

@@ -18 +18,2 @@
-<gloss>(something) overdone</gloss>
+<gloss>going too far</gloss>
+<gloss>overdoing (something)</gloss>

n-grams
遣り過ぎ	58
やり過ぎ	7070
やりすぎ	22931

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>遣り過ぎ</keb>
+<keb>やり過ぎ</keb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<keb>やり過ぎ</keb>
+<keb>遣り過ぎ</keb>
@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

Entry created

daijr, nikk: https://kotobank.jp/word/領-483871

@@ -11 +10,0 @@
-<pos>&suf;</pos>
@@ -13 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>territory of (country)</gloss>
+<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
+<gloss>territory (of country, feudal domain, etc.)</gloss>

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2080720">両・りょう・7</xref>

It's a fine line between being informative, making things searchable, and avoiding a mess. 
I think what Dine has proposed is fine, but I think it's also OK to add this as a sense in the 両 entry, which I have just done. I'll add an xref as well.

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<s_inf>also written 両</s_inf>
+<misc>&arch;</misc>

I don't get the point of things like  [note="also written 両"]
My impression is that this dictionary is not trying to be 
prescriptive as much as descriptive (which makes absolute sense 
for a bilingual dictionary).

but what use is it for somebody looking up 領 to know that the 
word can also be written 両 in certain cases? When this won't 
appear for somebody actually searching for 両? This seems 
suddenly prescriptive, "you can also use this character" - but 
actually it's in many cases NOT prescriptive, or shouldn't at 
least be read like it, though it will, because the "also 
written" word is usually quite obscure and not something a 
learner of Japanese should be using at all.

So the notes are doubly worthless - they don't help people 
actually looking for all meanings of 両, and they don't help 
people looking up 領 either.

splitting out

@@ -9,6 +8,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>こてんこてん</reb>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>コテンコテン</reb>

daij, prog
G n-grams:
こてんぱん	3244
コテンパン	49196
こてんぱ	        908
コテンパ	        4629
こてんこてん	24986
コテンコテン	1558

Not a noun.
More glosses. Not just a physical beating.

@@ -4,3 +3,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>こてんぱん</reb>
-</r_ele>
@@ -11,4 +8 @@
-<reb>こてんぱ</reb>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>コテンパ</reb>
+<reb>こてんぱん</reb>
@@ -21,0 +16,6 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>コテンパ</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>こてんぱ</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -23 +22,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -26 +25,5 @@
-<gloss>black and blue (e.g. beaten ...)</gloss>
+<gloss>completely (beaten, defeated, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>thoroughly</gloss>
+<gloss>utterly</gloss>
+<gloss>black and blue</gloss>
+<gloss>to a pulp</gloss>

I agree.

overly encyclopedic

@@ -9 +9,2 @@
-<gloss>kuru (degenerative brain disease usually associated with New Guinean cannibalism)</gloss>
+<field>&med;</field>
+<gloss>kuru (degenerative brain disease)</gloss>

@@ -9 +9 @@
-<gloss>kuru (degenerative brain disease usually associated with New Guinean cannabalism)</gloss>
+<gloss>kuru (degenerative brain disease usually associated with New Guinean cannibalism)</gloss>

Entry created

I don't think the detail is necessary.

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<gloss>fedelini (pasta similar to thin vermicelli)</gloss>
+<gloss>fedelini (pasta)</gloss>

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<field>&food;</field>

Entry created

お触書	1762
御触書	3821

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>お触書</keb>
+<keb>御触書</keb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<keb>御触書</keb>
+<keb>お触書</keb>
@@ -15 +15,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1694710">お達し・おたっし・2</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1694710">お達し・2</xref>
+<misc>&hist;</misc>

koj, daij, enc, of japan

@@ -15,1 +15,2 @@
-<gloss>Edo-period proclamation issued by the shogunate (or a daimyo, etc.)</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1694710">お達し・おたっし・2</xref>
+<gloss>Edo-period proclamation issued by the shogunate (or a daimyo, etc.) usu. to the general populace</gloss>

koj, daij, encyclopedia of japan

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<gloss>who benefits (from that?)</gloss>
+<gloss>who benefits (from that)?</gloss>

Thanks. I think that's the best approach.

It's used both as an expression and as an adjective. Probably best to have two senses.
A tricky one to gloss.

@@ -14,2 +14,13 @@
-<gloss>what's the point?</gloss>
-<gloss>why (would anybody do something like this)?</gloss>
+<gloss>who benefits (from that?)</gloss>
+<gloss>who cares?</gloss>
+<gloss>who would want that?</gloss>
+<gloss>who is it meant to appeal to?</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
+<misc>&net-sl;</misc>
+<gloss>pointless</gloss>
+<gloss>of benefit to no one</gloss>
+<gloss>of interest to no one</gloss>
+<gloss>appealing to no one</gloss>
+<gloss>extremely niche</gloss>

https://www.tutitatu.com/「誰得」の使い方や意味、例文や類義語を徹底解/
https://www.weblio.jp/content/誰得

I feel it's a bit broader than that. The tutitatu.com page has several examples which seem closer to the previous version.

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
@@ -14,2 +14,2 @@
-<gloss>meaningless</gloss>
-<gloss>pointless</gloss>
+<gloss>what's the point?</gloss>
+<gloss>why (would anybody do something like this)?</gloss>

風俗アイドル	1064

It's an entry to help explain the existence of フードル. If had far fewer n-grams hits I wouldn't have included it.

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/フードル

Still not a great gloss.
Also not sure it should be an entry.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demimonde

Star of the what?

doesn't mean much to me

Hardly needed.

@@ -21 +21 @@
-<s_inf>response to a provocation</s_inf>
+<s_inf>as a response to a provocation</s_inf>

@@ -25 +25 @@
-<gloss>Make my day</gloss>
+<gloss>make my day</gloss>

@@ -24,0 +25 @@
+<gloss>Make my day</gloss>

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>

再考察	6760

Yes, it's plainly 再+考察 but I can see having 再考 there solo is leading to mis-parsing.

@@ -12,3 +12,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1292720">再考慮</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1292710">再考</xref>
-<gloss>re-consideration</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1281150">考察・こうさつ</xref>
+<gloss>reconsideration</gloss>

Unlike structurally similar expressions like 再調査 and 再検討, which are correctly parsed, the expression 再考察 is currently incorrectly parsed in "Text glossing":
    再考 【さいこう】 (n,vs) reconsideration; (P)
    察 【さつ; サツ】 (n) (col) (uk) cops; police
(This is easily explained by the fact that 再考 itself is a valid expression.)
Promoting this entry should eliminate this parsing problem.

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<s_inf>e.g. 両 for 輛</s_inf>

Aligning.

@@ -13,2 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>substitution kanji</gloss>
-<gloss g_type="expl">kanji used in place of a common-use kanji</gloss>
+<gloss>substitute kanji</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">jōyō kanji used in place of a non-jōyō kanji</gloss>

daijs: https://kotobank.jp/word/代用字-1819537
代用漢字	720
代用字	533

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -15 +15,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

海っぺり	2085
海っ縁	61
うみっぺり	127

I agree it's not obvious, esp. the ぺり.

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>海っ縁</keb>
@@ -12,0 +16 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2056370">縁・へり・1</xref>

https://bukkenfan.jp/e/6077898741870757395

it's really a compound of umi + heri (maybe add a cross-reference to へり 《縁》?), but becomes pperi so it is not easy to figure out unless you already have an inkling, so I think it is reasonable to add 
to the dictionary

http://nlp.cis.unimelb.edu.au/jwb/clst/gaiseggloss.cgi?sent=�Υ�ե��������饤����
ノンフィクションライター	8618
ノンフィクション	1011379
ノンフィクション関連	230479
ノンフィクション作家	32323
ノンフィクション賞	18687

Yes, it's a very productive term. This one is not even in the top batch.

Given that we have entries for ノンフィクション and ライター, this seems unnecessary to me.

also 
ノンフィクション作家

ノンフィクションの作家 80 ngrams
ノンフィクションのライター	No matches

they're both vanishingly rare in comparison to the forms without の, and IMO the difference between them isn't particularly persuasive as an argument to keep ノンフィクションライター

ノンフィクションライター doesn't appear in any of the usual sources (not even eijiro) and given that it's obvious and the sum of its parts, i agree that there's not much argument for keeping it

You won't find anybody saying "ノンフィクション_の_ライター"
(but you WILL find people saying　ノンフィクションの作家, even if it's 
less common than ノンフィクション作家)
that's part why I think this should be an entry. The entirety of it is a 
loanword, it's not two loanwords mashed together.

http://nlp.cis.unimelb.edu.au/jwb/clst/gaiseggloss.cgi?sent=�Υ�ե��������饤����
ノンフィクションライター	8618
ノンフィクション	1011379
ノンフィクション関連	230479
ノンフィクション作家	32323
ノンフィクション賞	18687

Yes, it's a very productive term. This one is not even in the top batch.

Given that we have entries for ノンフィクション and ライター, this seems unnecessary to me.

also 
ノンフィクション作家

Splitting on source word (from 1137880).

Splitting on source word (from 1066390).

https://ejje.weblio.jp/content/入門者
https://www.linguee.com/english-japanese/search?source=auto&query=+入門者

We also need to include this meaning.

@@ -13 +13,7 @@
-<gloss>entry-level learner</gloss>
+<gloss>newcomer</gloss>
+<gloss>novice</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>new pupil</gloss>
+<gloss>new disciple</gloss>

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<gloss>beginner</gloss>

https://www.japantimes.co.jp/life/2013/09/22/language/a-japanese-word-processing-primer-for-beginners/#.XpRK0OFS-Cg

can't find it in an online dictionary. encountered in a current othello book.

Daijr

I think this is sufficient.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>exchange in which the opponent plays more moves, leading to a tempo loss (othello)</gloss>
+<gloss>loss of tempo (shogi, othello)</gloss>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>exchange in which opponent plays more moves in a certain area, leading to a tempo loss (othello)</gloss>
+<gloss>exchange in which the opponent plays more moves, leading to a tempo loss (othello)</gloss>

http://www.othello.org/lesson/lesson/mid1.html
https://将棋講座.com/将棋用語/手損.html
https://将棋講座.com/将棋用語/手得.html

it's unclear to me if the concept is exactly the same as the english 'tempo', and I haven't looked at the actual description of the term for shogi (or other games). there seem to be differences between games also. so I tried to translate the meaning of the first reference.

I don't know anything about shogi or othello but I assume it's OK.

http://www.shogi.net/shogivocab/vocabhtml.html
Daijr (shogi only).

I think this should be sufficient.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>exchange in which one plays more moves than the opponent, leading to a tempo gain (othello)</gloss>
+<gloss>gain of tempo (shogi, othello)</gloss>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>exchange in which one plays more moves in a certain area than the opponent, leading to a tempo gain (othello)</gloss>
+<gloss>exchange in which one plays more moves than the opponent, leading to a tempo gain (othello)</gloss>

http://www.othello.org/lesson/lesson/mid1.html
https://将棋講座.com/将棋用語/手損.html
https://将棋講座.com/将棋用語/手得.html

hard to translate; see my comments on the also submitted てぞん

Splitting on source word (from 1108540).

Daijr, GG5, etc.

Noting that this is a split from 2112780 コテンパン.

Simpler

Or this?

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<gloss>rematch (against an opponent one lost against previously)</gloss>
+<gloss>rematch (after an earlier loss)</gloss>

Is this maybe better?

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<gloss>rematch (after having lost the previous time)</gloss>
+<gloss>rematch (against an opponent one lost against previously)</gloss>

Thanks Rene.
I felt like rejecting it on principle, but considering it fits with the 2nd sense of リベンジ I thought I should look into it further. As pointed out, the n-gram count isn't coming from the film. I think it's OK to go in.

@@ -11,0 +12,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1925300">リベンジ・2</xref>
+<field>&sports;</field>

Well, there's no reference provided for the meaning, which means that we have to search for a reference that confirms what the user submitted.  Because the submitter presumably has some idea of the meaning (they know where they saw it and how they learned that it has such-and-such meaning), it's simple courtesy for them to provide the reference.

In my opinion, it should be impossible to submit if the reference field is empty and if the reference is invalid, then the submission should be instantly rejected.  You can't submit unreferenced factual claims to Wikipedia and expect others to dig up the reference you used... I don't know why a dictionary would be any different.

To be honest, I'm not even sure the gloss provided makes sense.  A rematch is between (at least) two people.  Presumably only one of the two people "lost the previous time", so this doesn't seem sensible.  Is the parenthesized information intended to distinguish it from the case in which the previous match was a draw?  Is there a reference indicating that it does not apply in this case?

Closing.

https://ameblo.jp/minisaki-trability/entry-12228927342.html

AFAICT it doesn't have to be about fighting.
I am getting increasingly annoyed by anonymous submissions without references. PLEASE do us the basic courtesy of providing some justification for a new entry or edit!

@@ -13 +13,3 @@
-<gloss>well-fought!</gloss>
+<gloss>well done!</gloss>
+<gloss>nice try!</gloss>
+<gloss>well fought!</gloss>

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<misc>&id;</misc>

GG5, Eijiro
苦境に立って	1982
苦境に立つ	4034

References next time, please.

@@ -12,0 +13,2 @@
+<gloss>to be in difficulties</gloss>
+<gloss>to be in trouble</gloss>

Unidic (reading)
辺上	1871

Shows up in a lot of pages showing geometry examples.

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>side, edge</gloss>
+<gloss>side</gloss>
+<gloss>edge</gloss>

http://hp.vector.co.jp/authors/VA015468/platina/oth/board.html
http://www.othello.org/lesson/lesson/mid3.html

seeing this in several othello references. the reading is just guessing. hope you can see it in your dictionaries!

gg5

中辞典 https://ejje.weblio.jp/content/幇助罪

OK. Wave it through for now.

https://www.google.co.jp/search?q=メガクラスター&source=lnms&tbm=nws

I think it's a new term. It's getting plenty of use at the moment but pre-COVID-19 online results have nothing to do with viruses.
Not sure how we want to handle it. It's one of those media buzzwords that will probably disappear as quickly as it appeared. "Mega cluster" gets plenty of coronavirus-related hits in English as well.
I think the meaning is fairly obvious from its parts. We have entries for メガ and クラスター.

@@ -9,6 +9,3 @@
-<field>&astron;</field>
-<gloss>mega-cluster</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>very large virus cluster</gloss>
+<lsource ls_wasei="y">mega cluster</lsource>
+<gloss>very large cluster (of a virus)</gloss>
+<gloss>large (concentrated) outbreak</gloss>

0 n-grams.

The term is used in English for clusters of galaxies.
Not sure about this one.

@@ -9,2 +9,6 @@
-<lsource ls_wasei="y">megacluster</lsource>
-<gloss>very large (virus) cluster</gloss>
+<field>&astron;</field>
+<gloss>mega-cluster</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>very large virus cluster</gloss>

They said this on NHK