@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<misc>&hist;</misc>

daijr, daijs, gakken have クリー as headword;
meikyo, nikk, koj mention クリー in the entry for クーリー

@@ -9,0 +10,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>クリー</reb>

《现代汉语词典》
《教育部重編國語辭典修訂本》 https://www.moedict.tw/苦力

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<lsource xml:lang="chi">kuli</lsource>
+<lsource xml:lang="chi">kǔlì</lsource>

Indeed. Well spotted.

I think this makes more sense.

@@ -10 +10 @@
-<lsource xml:lang="eng">(gene)ral (con)tractor</lsource>
+<lsource xml:lang="eng">gene(ral) con(tractor)</lsource>

I think I'll close it at this stage. 
We've had a ゼネラルコントラクター entry since 2005, and it gets ~200 in the n-grams. I see many of those are describing the source of ゼネコン as general contractor accompanied by the katakanan transcription, but a few are freestanding. That said, I can't really make a case for ゼネコン coming from ゼネラルコントラクター. I'll put a link from ゼネコン to here.

https://www.oreyume.com/column/otherwise/4204/
"ゼネコンとは、もともとは英単語の「General Contractor（ゼネラル・コントラクター）」が語源となった言葉です。"

The fact that no dictionary has an entry for ゼネラルコントラクター (or even mentions it) suggests that it was never an established term before ゼネコン came into existence.
See how the above site explains the origin of the term. I don't think it's generally considered an abbreviation in Japanese.

My bad. 

I think it'd be easier to just do the xref. I just don't find it very believable that "general contractor" made the jump from English into 
Japanese immediately as ゼネコン, and even 百歩譲って assuming it's true, it's such a minor, minor point and I don't see how it'd do any 
harm to call this an abbr and x-ref to ゼネラルコントラクター.

Daijr, GG5, etc.
ペガサス	280553
ペガソス	770
ペーガソス	87
ペガズ	< 20
ペガスス	12048

Just indication the major one is OK IMO. I think ペガズ can go.

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ペガスス</reb>
@@ -13,6 +15,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>ペガズ</reb>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>ペガスス</reb>
-</r_ele>
@@ -21 +18,7 @@
-<gloss>Pegasus</gloss>
+<field>&astron;</field>
+<lsource xml:lang="gre"/>
+<gloss>Pegasus (star)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>Pegasus (winged horse in Greek mythology)</gloss>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/ペガサス

ペガスス（ラテン語: Pegasus）、ペガサス（英語: Pegasus）、ペガズ（フランス語: Pégase

How to specify lsrc lang:word in cases of multiple lsrc from several distinct readings on the same entry?

@@ -12,0 +13,6 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ペガズ</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ペガスス</reb>
+</r_ele>

daij, wiki

see rejected 2697580

@@ -6,0 +6,6 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ペガソス</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ペーガソス</reb>

Last discussed on 2839252.

I'm sure we decided that we're only using id for expressions.

@@ -19 +18,0 @@
-<misc>&id;</misc>

I think this is cleaner and more to the point.

@@ -19,2 +19,2 @@
-<gloss>putting somebody down (esp. in an underhanded way) in an attempt to appear superior</gloss>
-<gloss>putting somebody in their place</gloss>
+<misc>&id;</misc>
+<gloss>asserting dominance</gloss>

"The term minute steak is also used in the United Kingdom, where the term cube steak is little known."

I think "cube steak" is a 米語 term that simply confuses the entry. Best omitted.

@@ -14 +13,0 @@
-<gloss>cube steak</gloss>

wiki https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cube_steak

In Ireland, Canada, Australia, and some parts of the United States, cube steak may be called a minute steak,[2] because it can be cooked quickly.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&food;</field>
@@ -12,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>cube steak</gloss>

Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ミニッツ・ステーキ</reb>

《现代汉语词典》
《教育部重編國語辭典修訂本》 https://www.moedict.tw/拉麵

@@ -27 +27 @@
-<lsource xml:lang="chi">lamian</lsource>
+<lsource xml:lang="chi">lāmiàn</lsource>

ordered by hits

@@ -17,0 +17,4 @@
+<reb>らーめん</reb>
+<re_inf>&ik;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>

Aligning with our usual style for Chinese-derived words.

@@ -12,1 +12,2 @@
-<reb>らーめん</reb>
+<reb>ラーメン</reb>
+<re_pri>gai1</re_pri>
@@ -19,6 +20,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>ラーメン</reb>
-<re_nokanji/>
-<re_pri>gai1</re_pri>
-<re_pri>ichi1</re_pri>
-</r_ele>
@@ -29,1 +24,2 @@
-<gloss>ramen (Chinese-style noodles)</gloss>
+<gloss>ramen</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">Chinese-style noodles</gloss>

Mandarin pronunciation of 辣油
(I'm a native Mandarin speaker and can personally verify the pronunciation, but 辣油 isn't in Chinese dictionaries)

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<lsource xml:lang="chi">layou</lsource>
+<lsource xml:lang="chi">làyóu</lsource>

not needed

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<re_restr>ラー油</re_restr>

No, we don't.

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1152000">おしん</xref>

I don't think we normally do x-refs between terms sharing the same kanji right?

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1151990">あくしん</xref>

[vt]:    sankoku, smk, shinsen, iwakoku
[vt,vi]: meikyo, obunsha

only obunsha says intransitive

@@ -22 +21,0 @@
-<pos>&vi;</pos>

May as well.

All of the kokugos include a note similar to 「悪い意味に使う事が多い」. Most of the examples in gg5 also reflect this.
Maybe "planning" sounds too neutral to be the first gloss?

"plotting" is used in some eij examples

Adding back 劃策 as sK

@@ -7,0 +8,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>劃策</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -18,0 +23 @@
+<gloss>scheming</gloss>
@@ -20 +24,0 @@
-<gloss>scheming</gloss>
@@ -22,0 +27 @@
+<gloss>plotting</gloss>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -16,0 +17,2 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

nikk https://kotobank.jp/word/旧痾・久痾-2028697

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>久痾</keb>
@@ -11,0 +15 @@
+<field>&med;</field>

daij, koj

@@ -16 +15,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -17,0 +17 @@
+<gloss>lens surface</gloss>

OK

GG5; Chuujiten

cf. our 「四時」 entry

The term refers to a specific group of seasons, so needs a definite article.

Note: Wisdom has it as "the (four) seasons".

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<gloss>four seasons</gloss>
+<gloss>the four seasons</gloss>

Daijirin is my only ref which says [vs].
Seems plausible based on the n-gram counts. The suru forms get a modest amount of usages on twitter.
I think it's intransitive.

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬─────────╮
│ 示談　　　 │ 296,489 │
│ 示談する　 │   3,131 │
│ 示談して　 │   2,649 │
│ 示談にする │   1,558 │
╰─ーーーーー─┴─────────╯

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

gg5, prog

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<gloss>private settlement</gloss>

Yes

gg5
shinmeikai: "「一定の格式を持った神社」の意の和語的表現。"
daijr: "神をまつってある建物。神社。"

I think it's always Shinto.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>shrine (usually Shinto)</gloss>
+<gloss>(Shinto) shrine</gloss>

daijr, gg5, prog, 中辞典

Not sure where "way of doing" came from.

@@ -13,2 +12,0 @@
-<gloss>way of doing</gloss>
-<gloss>cause</gloss>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

daijr, gg5, prog

Not necessarily written.

@@ -17 +17,2 @@
-<gloss>written vow</gloss>
+<gloss>oath</gloss>
+<gloss>vow</gloss>

Can't have "nokanji" when there's only one reading.

@@ -14 +13,0 @@
-<re_nokanji/>

daij, koj
meikyo: "「節」「浬」と当てる"

The kokugos don't have a hiragana reading.

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_inf>&ateji;</ke_inf>
@@ -8,0 +10 @@
+<ke_inf>&ateji;</ke_inf>
@@ -10,3 +11,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>のっと</reb>
-</r_ele>

I don't think it's a separate sense.

@@ -22,6 +22,2 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<field>&internet;</field>
-<gloss>voice call</gloss>
-<gloss>videoconference session</gloss>
+<gloss>(Internet) voice call</gloss>
+<gloss>videoconference call</gloss>
@@ -30,0 +27 @@
+<s_inf>used to determine a charge</s_inf>

Obviously being used for more than telephone calls. I wondered about just broadening sense 1, but then thought maybe a new sense would be better.

@@ -22 +22,6 @@
-<gloss>(Internet) voice call</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<field>&internet;</field>
+<gloss>voice call</gloss>
+<gloss>videoconference session</gloss>

This also seems to be used with the meaning of call as in a (video) meeting, at least by Google. On Google Meet it says 〇〇さんがこの通話に参加しています。

meikyo has [vt,vi] but the rest of the refs are just [vi]

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーー─┬───────────┬───────╮
│ 　通話 │ 2,195,154 │ 99.8% │
│ を通話 │     5,380 │  0.2% │
╰─ーーー─┴───────────┴───────╯

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

《现代汉语词典》
《教育部重編國語辭典修訂本》 https://www.moedict.tw/牌

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<lsource xml:lang="chi">pai</lsource>
+<lsource xml:lang="chi">pái</lsource>

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<field>&mahj;</field>
@@ -14 +15 @@
-<gloss>tile (mahjong)</gloss>
+<gloss>tile</gloss>

nikk entry for ドラ牌
〔名〕（「ドラ」の語源は未詳。中国語から、あるいは英語「ドラゴン」からという）マー
ジャンの懸賞牌をいう。普通、和了の際一牌をイーファン（一翻）として計算する。

maybe suffix as well? considering how many kinds of words 
there are that end with it.

@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@
+<pos>&ctr;</pos>

Daijr - "ヨーグルトなど"
ルミナス - xref to ヨーグルト

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1137520">ヨーグルト</xref>

gg5, daij

Not just yoghurt.

@@ -12,3 +12,3 @@
-<gloss>yogurt</gloss>
-<gloss>yoghurt</gloss>
-<gloss>yoghourt</gloss>
+<gloss>fermented milk</gloss>
+<gloss>cultured milk</gloss>
+<gloss>fermented milk product</gloss>

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<gloss>yogurt</gloss>
@@ -12,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>yoghourt</gloss>

@@ -21,2 +21 @@
-<gloss>Pinyin</gloss>
-<gloss g_type="expl">Chinese romanization system</gloss>
+<gloss>Pinyin (Chinese romanization system)</gloss>

併音	241	0.3%

iK -> sK

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

@@ -20 +20 @@
-<lsource xml:lang="chi">Pīnyīn</lsource>
+<lsource xml:lang="chi">pīnyīn</lsource>

https://www.weblio.jp/wkpja/content/ピン音_ピン音の概要
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pinyin

@@ -20 +20 @@
-<lsource xml:lang="chi"/>
+<lsource xml:lang="chi">Pīnyīn</lsource>

👍

Thanks for the explanation. I don't have any objections to using
the field tags to mean specific terminology or jargon rather than
categorization, but until now I had no idea that was the
intent. (I finally understand why タンク isn't [mil]).

We typically only use field tags for terminology (i.e. technical or special terms). So 積分 gets a math tag but 数学者 does not. It has been suggested in the past that we expand the use of field tags to include all field-related terms but I'm not sure there's much enthusiasm for that idea. I'm quite happy with the current policy, which mirrors that of the JEs and English dictionaries.
Deciding what counts as "terminology" isn't an exact science, but simple A+B terms like 麻雀クラブ or 麻雀打ち wouldn't usually be tagged.

I thought the purpose of field tags was at least partially to
serve as metadata. For example, you can search "#mahj" on
jisho.org to bring up a list of all mahjong vocabulary.

If we're going to remove tags because they look redundant, should
we also remove the tag from 麻雀牌 ("mahjong tile"), 雀荘 ("mahjong
parlour; mahjong parlor"), 雀卓 ("mahjong table"), etc?

We're actually kind of inconsistent about this right now. In
addition to 麻雀, similar entries like 麻雀打ち and 麻雀クラブ
also don't have the tag.

Absolutely. The field tags should be dropped from 花札 and 相撲.

@@ -28 +27,0 @@
-<field>&mahj;</field>

Sense 3 is in GG5. I'd drop the tag.

@@ -31 +30,0 @@
-<misc>&obs;</misc>

daijr, daijs, nikk: https://kotobank.jp/word/欄-453905

not sure if this is obs or obsc

@@ -28,0 +29,9 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&obs;</misc>
+<s_inf>orig. meaning</s_inf>
+<gloss>handrail</gloss>
+<gloss>railing</gloss>
+<gloss>banister</gloss>
+<gloss>balustrade</gloss>
+</sense>

gg5 koj daijs

@@ -19 +19,3 @@
-<gloss>column of text (e.g. in a newspaper)</gloss>
+<gloss>section (e.g. in a newspaper)</gloss>
+<gloss>column</gloss>
+<gloss>page</gloss>
@@ -24,0 +27 @@
+<gloss>blank</gloss>

i think this can refer to a whole section in a newspaper and not just a column

nikk: https://kotobank.jp/word/欄干・欄檻・闌干-2092245
欄干	94240
闌干	225
欄杆	69
欄檻	58

@@ -14,0 +15,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>欄檻</keb>

daij, gg5, prog

Splitting the arch sense into two. Probably don't need either of them.

@@ -24 +24,2 @@
-<gloss>guardrail</gloss>
+<gloss>railing</gloss>
+<gloss>guard rail</gloss>
@@ -26 +27 @@
-<gloss>bannister</gloss>
+<gloss>banister</gloss>
@@ -33 +34,2 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-t;</pos>
+<pos>&adv-to;</pos>
@@ -35,2 +37,9 @@
-<gloss>(a person) shining like the stars or moon</gloss>
-<gloss>(a person) crying endlessly</gloss>
+<gloss>(shining) brightly (of the moon or stars)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<stagk>欄干</stagk>
+<stagk>闌干</stagk>
+<pos>&adj-t;</pos>
+<pos>&adv-to;</pos>
+<misc>&arch;</misc>
+<gloss>(flowing) endlessly (of tears)</gloss>

daijr, daijs, nikk, gakken, meikyo all give 十人力 as the suffix example.  adding to note in case someone thinks 力 attach to number directly without 人

@@ -19 +19 @@
-<s_inf>after a number of people</s_inf>
+<s_inf>after a number of people, e.g. 十人力</s_inf>

koj, daij, gg5

@@ -13,0 +13,9 @@
+<gloss>power</gloss>
+<gloss>proficiency</gloss>
+<gloss>ability</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
+<s_inf>after a number of people</s_inf>
+<gloss>the strength of ... people</gloss>
+<gloss>the strength of ... men</gloss>

@@ -32 +32,2 @@
-<gloss>old monetary unit (0.001 yen)</gloss>
+<misc>&hist;</misc>
+<gloss>rin (monetary unit; 0.001 yen)</gloss>

nikk:
https://kotobank.jp/word/厘-150228
https://kotobank.jp/word/釐・厘-2092367

@@ -8,0 +9,4 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>釐</keb>
+<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
@@ -10,0 +15 @@
+<re_restr>厘</re_restr>
@@ -12,0 +18,4 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>り</reb>
+<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>

Yes, odd.

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -8,0 +10 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

ngrams:
殺人	4612155	 [ichi1,news1,nf03] 
拉致	2542573	 <<--- nothing?       Wanikani level 40
暗殺	1140656	 [ichi1,news1,nf07]
誘拐	864261	 [ichi1,news1,nf06] 　Wanikani level 54

WaniKani level 40:
https://www.wanikani.com/vocabulary/拉致

===
スプーン	1845380	33.9%

拉致	2542573	46.7% 
拉致問題	492896	9.1%   <--- this is [spec1]
拉致され	290872	5.3%
拉致被害者 272333	5.0%

Never seen this before... Can/should we make this [spec1]?

This word is apparently more common online than "spoon".  The compound word 拉致問題, which requires you to know *this* word, is [spec1] and thus marked "common" in jisho.org.

I don't know how this wasn't swept up by one of the [news] collations... A bit baffled. So baffled, I went to archive.org to get the Mainichi Shinbun stats file.  This term is ranked ~43,000 with 15 occurrences, presumably over 4 years.   It is the only term that appears with the "拉" kanji at all.  誘拐 is ranked ~3500 with 1639 instances.  Editorial policy of the newspaper in the late 90s? 拉致 seems common enough in news searches today.

Just a sanity check, Google news "reports" (I know, I know...) 
"拉致された" 4920 hits 
"誘拐された" 5870 hits

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

daijr, daijs, nikk: https://kotobank.jp/word/拉致-656202

らっち is not in the smaller kokugos but
https://furigana.info/w/拉致
らち	55.0%
らっち+らつち	45.0%

@@ -8,0 +9,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>らっち</reb>

毫釐	336
毫厘	91
https://kotobank.jp/word/毫釐-497823
https://kotobank.jp/word/毫釐・毫厘-263429

@@ -6,0 +7,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>毫厘</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -8,0 +12,4 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ごうりん</reb>
+<re_restr>毫釐</re_restr>

Fork

https://www.weblio.jp/wkpja/content/チャーハン_チャーハンの概要

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<lsource xml:lang="chi">chao fan</lsource>
+<lsource xml:lang="chi">chǎofàn</lsource>

Yes, that's consistent with the handling of 拉麺, etc.

Japanese Wikipedia "チャーハン（炒飯）は、", Microsoft IME

It seems that 炒飯 can be read as "チャーハン" just as 拉麺 can be read as "ラーメン". Additionally, only inputting "ちゃーはん" will let you convert to 炒飯 using Microsoft IME; inputting "ちゃあはん" yields no such conversion.

@@ -9 +8,0 @@
-<re_nokanji/>

炒飯	362788	23.6%
チャーハン	1162425	75.6%
ちゃあはん	399	0.0%
ちゃーはん	11225	0.7%

ちゃあはん could stay as a nokanji if it were common, but it's not.

@@ -10,3 +9,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>ちゃあはん</reb>

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<field>&food;</field>

https://www.weblio.jp/wkpja/content/チャーハン_チャーハンの概要

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<lsource xml:lang="chi">chao fan</lsource>
+<lsource xml:lang="chi">chǎofàn</lsource>

Dunno about the yoji. It's on a couple of lists.

gg5, prog, Wisdom
daijr: "ありとあらゆる口ぎたない，ののしりの言葉。「―を浴びせる」"

I think this is better.
Is this really yoji?

@@ -16,5 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>abuse</gloss>
-<gloss>vilification</gloss>
-<gloss>insult</gloss>
-<gloss>name-calling</gloss>
-<gloss>vituperation</gloss>
+<gloss>all manner of (verbal) abuse</gloss>
+<gloss>all kinds of names</gloss>
@@ -21,0 +19,2 @@
+<gloss>torrent of abuse</gloss>
+<gloss>stream of insults</gloss>

Daijr, GG5, ルミナス, etc.

If you want to add translations without giving a reference or any supporting statement, it's best not to put them first.

@@ -15,0 +16,2 @@
+<gloss>abuse</gloss>
+<gloss>vilification</gloss>
@@ -18 +19,0 @@
-<gloss>vilification</gloss>

@@ -15,0 +16,2 @@
+<gloss>insult</gloss>
+<gloss>name-calling</gloss>

daijr, daijs, nikk: https://kotobank.jp/word/利器-657291
all kokugos (include gakken, meikyo, smk) put "sharp-edged tool" above "convenience"; many give the antonym 鈍器

@@ -12 +12,3 @@
-<gloss>convenience</gloss>
+<xref type="ant" seq="1457620">鈍器</xref>
+<gloss>sharp-edged tool</gloss>
+<gloss>sharp weapon</gloss>
@@ -16 +18,9 @@
-<gloss>sharp-edged tool</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2844089">文明の利器</xref>
+<gloss>convenience</gloss>
+<gloss>facility</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&obs;</misc>
+<gloss>superior talent</gloss>
+<gloss>outstanding ability</gloss>

Luminous, 新和英中辞典, daijr/s, prog

@@ -12,1 +12,0 @@
-<gloss>sharp-edged tool</gloss>
@@ -15,0 +14,4 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>sharp-edged tool</gloss>
+</sense>

《现代汉语词典》
https://www.weblio.jp/content/高粱

Taiwan's standard Mandarin pronunciation is gāoliáng; I'm here following the PRC standard & Japanese Wikipedia

@@ -26 +26 @@
-<lsource xml:lang="chi"/>
+<lsource xml:lang="chi">gāoliang</lsource>

GG5, etc.

@@ -26,2 +26,3 @@
-<lsource xml:lang="chi">kaoliang</lsource>
-<gloss>variety of sorghum, esp. used in making spirits</gloss>
+<lsource xml:lang="chi"/>
+<gloss>kaoliang</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">variety of sorghum, esp. used in making spirits</gloss>

《教育部重編國語辭典修訂本》 https://www.moedict.tw/滿貫

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<lsource xml:lang="chi"/>
+<lsource xml:lang="chi">mǎnguàn</lsource>

daijs やく‐マンガン【役満貫】

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>まんがん</reb>
+<reb>マンガン</reb>

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&mahj;</field>
@@ -13 +14 @@
-<gloss>win worth 8000 points (or, if dealer, 12000 points) (mahjong)</gloss>
+<gloss>win worth 8000 points (or, if dealer, 12000 points)</gloss>

《现代汉语词典》 老酒 lǎojiǔ <方> [名] 酒，特指绍兴酒

i don't think the note is needed

@@ -22 +22 @@
-<lsource xml:lang="chi">laojiu</lsource>
+<lsource xml:lang="chi">lǎojiǔ</lsource>

gg5, prog
meikyo: "案内書などのタイトルにも使う。「英文法─」"
早わかり	303130
早分かり	149628
早分り	1032
速わかり	72
速分かり	No matches

Doesn't mean "quick learner".

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>早わかり</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -8 +11 @@
-<keb>速分かり</keb>
+<keb>早分り</keb>
@@ -11 +14,4 @@
-<keb>早わかり</keb>
+<keb>速わかり</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>速分かり</keb>
@@ -19 +24,0 @@
-<gloss>quick learner</gloss>
@@ -21 +26 @@
-<gloss>easy to understand</gloss>
+<gloss>catching on quickly</gloss>
@@ -25 +30,4 @@
-<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<s_inf>usu. in titles</s_inf>
+<gloss>(beginner's) guide</gloss>
+<gloss>easy guide (to)</gloss>
+<gloss>quick start guide</gloss>
@@ -27 +34,0 @@
-<gloss>guidebook</gloss>

@@ -10,0 +10,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>早わかり</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -17,0 +20,2 @@
+<gloss>quick understanding</gloss>
+<gloss>easy to understand</gloss>

not in Chinese dictionaries, personally verified.
the actual pronunciation is yìzhuāng but pinyin orthography doesn't reflect that

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<lsource xml:lang="chi">yizhuang</lsource>
+<lsource xml:lang="chi">yīzhuāng</lsource>

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<field>&mahj;</field>
@@ -14 +15 @@
-<gloss>one full game of mahjong (consisting of east, south, west, and north rounds)</gloss>
+<gloss>one full game (consisting of east, south, west, and north rounds)</gloss>

daij

conforming to new style rule, contrasting with 半荘 and returning xref

@@ -8,3 +8,0 @@
-<reb>いいちゃん</reb>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
@@ -12,1 +9,0 @@
-<re_nokanji/>
@@ -16,2 +12,3 @@
-<lsource xml:lang="chi"/>
-<gloss>a game of mahjong</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2645830">半荘</xref>
+<lsource xml:lang="chi">yizhuang</lsource>
+<gloss>one full game of mahjong (consisting of east, south, west, and north rounds)</gloss>

Closing.

Daijisen: 特定の人物や現象などの影響を受けた人。追従者。

I thought GG5's characterization was quite accurate. I recall political commentators sneering as they use the phrase. Daijisen's use of "追従者" is rather strong.

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<s_inf>after the name of a politician</s_inf>
+<s_inf>e.g. 田中チルドレン</s_inf>
@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<gloss>politicians riding on a leader's coattails</gloss>

I don't think there's any negative nuance in there (like "riding on the coattails"), generally

@@ -13,3 +13,3 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<misc>&col;</misc>
-<gloss>politicians riding on a leader's coattails</gloss>
+<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
+<s_inf>after the name of a politician</s_inf>
+<gloss>group of politicians associated with a particular political leader</gloss>

GG5: 田中チルドレン 〔政治家田中に追従する若手政治家〕 Tanaka's 「Children [Kids]; politicians riding on Tanaka's coattails.
Daijisen: similar, using Koizumi as an example

@@ -11,0 +12,5 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&col;</misc>
+<gloss>politicians riding on a leader's coattails</gloss>
+</sense>

チルドレン	247650

* d-daijs: https://kotobank.jp/word/チルドレン-569791

daijs has a second sense going on.

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1307870">子供たち</xref>

I'm not sure 3% is that appropriate when there's just one kanji form.
Anyway, the key tag is the [uk].

叉焼	        46,933	        3.2%	
チャーシュー	1,403,380	96.8%

3% is the absolute upper limit for rK. This was (incorrectly) tagged as rK last year without justification.

@@ -6 +5,0 @@
-<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

The [rK] is quite appropriate here. I think you are over-interpreting it.

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

Kaldi product with large kana and small kanji. (This side-by-side presentation in marketing seems common enough)
https://www.amazon.co.jp/dp/B0BDXPWV1F/

Giant full-page elaborate menu with kanji featured prominantly.
https://gyoza-maruken.jp/info/detail/27

Menu with kanji as primary, furigana above
https://tomakomai.mypl.net/shop/00000363813/news?d=1980132

チャーシュー	1403380	96.8%
叉焼	46933	3.2%

3.2% is low as a percent, but 50,000 n-grams is not rare.  I think [uK] covers this? The wikipedia page is full of the kanji form
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/チャーシュー

Twitter frequency can be measured in posts-per-hour (not rare)
https://twitter.com/search?q=叉焼&src=typed_query&f=live

I'm guessing that most Japanese adults probably have little problem reading this. I would usually interpret [rK] as a very rare kanji form with a more-common popular kanji form, or a form where kanji almost never appear. (ie. knowing the kanji form verges on useless, which seems not to be the case here).

@@ -6 +5,0 @@
-<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

I think this works.

@@ -25 +25 @@
-<gloss>fence (esp. of horse-riding ground)</gloss>
+<gloss>boundary fence (esp. of horse-riding ground)</gloss>

daijr: https://kotobank.jp/word/埒・埓-407784
daijs, nikk: https://kotobank.jp/word/埒-656203
gakken: かこい。しきり。さかい。特に、馬場の周囲のさく。
meikyo: ◇もと、馬場の周囲にめぐらした柵(さく)の意。
smk: 〔馬場の周囲の柵(サク)の意〕

Sorry for my poor English. Is 馬場の周囲のさく translated as "fence around … ground" or "fence surrounding … ground"?
aozora:
水蓮の花、競馬場の白	い埒。	 　ラジオをかけると
ている。熊が馬へ乗っ	て埒の	周囲をかけ廻る、棒を
後に、殺風景にも競馬	の埒に	せられて、それから再
て歩いた。 　競馬場	の埒の	周囲は人垣で埋った。
お初の情熱は、いわば	、埒を	刎ね越えた奔馬のよう
の仕業故である。闘技	の埒に	馬乗り入れてランスロ

@@ -12,0 +13,4 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>らっち</reb>
+<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>
@@ -17,0 +22,5 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<s_inf>orig. meaning</s_inf>
+<gloss>fence (esp. of horse-riding ground)</gloss>
+</sense>

itaiji

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>埓</keb>

Entry created

according to Wikipedia, the proper characters are 麺麻, so the Mandarin pronunciation is miànmá (compare 麻竹 mázhú)

@@ -24 +24 @@
-<lsource xml:lang="chi">mianma</lsource>
+<lsource xml:lang="chi">miànmá</lsource>

N-grams

WWW images for 麺媽 are much the same as for the other two.

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<keb>麺媽</keb>
+<keb>麺碼</keb>
@@ -11 +11 @@
-<keb>麺碼</keb>
+<keb>麺媽</keb>

koj

麺媽 seems like a mistake but I don't know Chinese

@@ -8,0 +9,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>麺碼</keb>

Can't find a ref. Probably the latter reason. I'll remove it.

@@ -21,1 +21,0 @@
-<misc>&sens;</misc>

Wikipedia: https://www.weblio.jp/content/功夫
《现代汉语词典》
《教育部重編國語辭典修訂本》 https://www.moedict.tw/功夫

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<lsource xml:lang="chi">go'ngfu</lsource>
+<lsource xml:lang="chi">gōngfu</lsource>

any dictionary

'kung fu' isn't capitalized unless you're talking about the TV show

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<gloss>Kung-Fu</gloss>
+<gloss>kung fu</gloss>

http://kotobank.jp/word/クンフー
http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/クンフー
http://d.hatena.ne.jp/keyword/����
Google hits:
"カンフー" 8M
"クンフー" 430k

@@ -9,0 +9,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>クンフー</reb>

〈可／べ〉きでは〈無／な〉い

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーー─┬───────────┬───────╮
│ べきでは無い │    18,958 │  1.6% │ - add, sK
│ 可きではない │       210 │  0.0% │ - add, sK
│ 可きでは無い │        33 │  0.0% │
│ べきではない │ 1,197,884 │ 98.4% │
├─ーーーーーー─┼───────────┼───────┤
│ べきでは無く │       248 │  0.3% │
│ 可きでは無く │         0 │  0.0% │
│ 可きではなく │         0 │  0.0% │
│ べきではなく │    74,530 │ 99.7% │
╰─ーーーーーー─┴───────────┴───────╯

I didn't read the long discussion in this entry but I don't think we have a problem with these sorts of kanji forms anymore.

@@ -3,0 +4,8 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>べきでは無い</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>可きではない</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
@@ -9,0 +18,2 @@
+<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

I've responded to Rob directly.

Thanks for the explanations on your decision. And sorry for the long reply. I was just worried that if I didn't go into the whole thought process, it might seem like I was arguing for a very nit-picky thing, when really for me it's much more of a big-picture kind of question.

With that in mind, I notice that no one has yet responded to the point I made about JMDICT being the data source for many Japanese language learning tools, and even if data may not reflect popularity (as in the example of "(wa) katakana at top"), it may still be worthwhile for the sake of documenting the language itself.

All that said, I respect and accept your decision on this particular entry; but I'm still interested in hearing your thoughts/opinions about this more 'philosophical' point about how JMDICT should (or should not) attempt to support language learners, rather than just reflect current-day usage.

Is such discussion appropriate in these comments or is there another/better way I can ask about this kind of thing?

Jim, I'll look for your email address and try to email you. Thanks for the offer. [D'oh! I see it now at the top of the confirmation page.]

Thanks, Marcus. I think that covers it, and I'll close this off now. I don't mind having the kanji form shown on the basic forms (GG5 has 可き in the べき entry), but I do think it is inappropriate to have them in the virtually-always-kana expressions.
Re この/此の/etc. I see Daijirin and GG5 have the 此の, but the other JEs don't.
Marcus: I've added a GitHub issue for [rare]
Rob: if you want to find out more about the n-grams, email me. They are not the counts you get from Google searches, which are almost useless.

@@ -4,3 +3,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>可きではない</keb>
-</k_ele>
@@ -13 +9,0 @@
-<misc>&uk;</misc>

《教育部重編國語辭典修訂本》 https://www.moedict.tw/白板
白板 bái bǎn 1. 麻將牌中牌面僅畫一方形框，而無其他色彩或圖案者，稱為「白板」。 (mahjong tile drawn with only a rectangular box and no other color or pattern)

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<lsource xml:lang="chi"/>
+<lsource xml:lang="chi">báibǎn</lsource>

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&mahj;</field>
@@ -13 +14 @@
-<gloss>white dragon tile (mahjong)</gloss>
+<gloss>white dragon tile</gloss>

daijs

@@ -13,2 +13,1 @@
-<gloss>white mahjong tile</gloss>
-<gloss>blank mahjong tile</gloss>
+<gloss>white dragon tile (mahjong)</gloss>

Duplicate (fork).

Also not just any というのは, but specifically “X というのは Y だ” (same reference, discussion of というのは page 642).

Not skilled enough to implement but the “とは” in sense [1] doesn’t belong here.  
The [1] sense of the とは is an abbreviated form of というのは.
See discussion in “A Dictionary of Advanced Japanese Grammar” (Seiichi Makino and Michio Tsutsui) page 664.
I believe sense [1] should be its own entry with a link to the already existing というのは entry.

This has been very quiet for a long time. Closing.

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1008500">と言うのは・というのは・2</xref>

The JEs often start their English glosses with short Japanese explanations of the context, etc. For its "-とは" entry GG5 begins sense 1 with "〔…と言うのは〕".
I can see that the 3-page とは entry in the DAJG is really about senses 2-5 here, and that our sense 1 is rather like と言うのは (2) "as for ...; when it comes to ...; regarding ...; how about ...", but I don't think it's a reason to break up the entry, just at the kokugos and JEs don't break up their entties. In fact I wouldn't be as certain as M&T seem to be that sense 1 is always an abbreviation of というのは. An xref between them wouldn't hurt.
I'll close this to shorten the queue, and reopen with a suggested xref.

I am not quite able to follow the logic.  
In the expression というのは, wouldn’t 「と」have been a 格助詞, and 「は」have been a 係助詞?
So wouldn’t the abbreviated form still be a 格助詞「と」and a 係助詞「は」as in the original expression?.
Anyway, the senses after [1] all fit together semantically.  [1] is semantically alien.

> The issue is that sense [1] is the meaning of completely different homonym and an abbreviation of a special circumstance expression, and is not a compound particle at all
Not according to the kokugos dictionaries. In daijr and daijs, sense 1 is under the same "格助詞「と」＋係助詞「は」" heading as the other senses.
> Do you have access to the reference I gave?
I do. I'm just pointing out that other references don't support that assertion. The kokugos will almost always indicate if a term is an abbreviation but they do not in this case.

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<field>&food;</field>
@@ -17 +18 @@
-<gloss>broad bean chili paste (Chinese seasoning)</gloss>
+<gloss>doubanjiang (Chinese broad bean chili paste)</gloss>

《教育部重編國語辭典》 https://www.moedict.tw/豆瓣醬

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<lsource xml:lang="chi">doubanjiang</lsource>
+<lsource xml:lang="chi">dòubànjiàng</lsource>

Entry created

As we're giving the source as Chinese, ファーリュー should lead.

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>かりゅう</reb>
+<reb>ファーリュー</reb>
@@ -11 +11 @@
-<reb>ファーリュー</reb>
+<reb>かりゅう</reb>

I suspect that reading isn't used much.

https://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q10149195790
https://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q1351871298

@@ -6,0 +7,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>かりゅう</reb>
+</r_ele>

personally verified (as a native Mandarin speaker)

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<lsource xml:lang="chi">hualiu</lsource>
+<lsource xml:lang="chi">huáliú</lsource>

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/中國人

pinyin orthography requires accent on "o" not "u"

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<lsource xml:lang="chi">zhōnggúorén</lsource>
+<lsource xml:lang="chi">zhōngguórén</lsource>

http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/中國人

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<lsource xml:lang="chi">zhongguoren</lsource>
+<lsource xml:lang="chi">zhōnggúorén</lsource>

Koj, ＫＯＤ追加語彙

Better than "X".

@@ -10,2 +10,2 @@
-<misc>&vulg;</misc>
-<misc>&X;</misc>
+<misc>&derog;</misc>
+<lsource xml:lang="chi">zhongguoren</lsource>

Entry created

0 n-grams.

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>不コ本</keb>
+<keb>不彀本</keb>
@@ -8 +8,4 @@
-<keb>不彀本</keb>
+<keb>不够本</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>不コ本</keb>

koj, daijr, daijs all give 不彀本 as sole kanji spelling: https://kotobank.jp/word/不彀本-629752
nikk (https://kotobank.jp/word/ポコペン-2082324) says
中国語「不够本・不彀本（元値に足りないの意）」から
both 不够本 and 不彀本 are pronounced as bùgòuběn in Mandarin (the actual pronunciation is búgòuběn, but pinyin orthography doesn't reflect that)

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>不彀本</keb>
@@ -13 +16 @@
-<lsource xml:lang="chi">bugouben</lsource>
+<lsource xml:lang="chi">bùgòuběn</lsource>

http://zokugo-dict.com/30ho/pokopen.htm
中国語が語源の駄目を出す言葉であったため、中国人の蔑称としても使われた。
ただし、こうした意味での使用は年々減っており...

@@ -19,2 +19,6 @@
-<misc>&vulg;</misc>
-<misc>&X;</misc>
+<gloss>type of children's game</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&derog;</misc>
+<misc>&obs;</misc>
@@ -24,4 +27,0 @@
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>type of children's game</gloss>
-</sense>

Entry created

en.wiki

@@ -19,0 +20 @@
+<field>&food;</field>
@@ -21 +22 @@
-<gloss>shaoxingjiu (Chinese alcohol made from rice or glutinous millet)</gloss>
+<gloss>Shaoxing wine</gloss>

《现代汉语词典》 for official pinyin orthography

@@ -20 +20 @@
-<lsource xml:lang="chi"/>
+<lsource xml:lang="chi">shàoxīngjiǔ</lsource>

Entry created

Fork

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/担担麺
https://www.moedict.tw/擔擔麵

@@ -30 +30 @@
-<lsource xml:lang="chi">dan dan mian</lsource>
+<lsource xml:lang="chi">dàndànmiàn</lsource>

We tend to do it on Google hits, and 担々麺 is far more common.

@@ -5,1 +5,1 @@
-<keb>担担麺</keb>
+<keb>担々麺</keb>
@@ -8,1 +8,1 @@
-<keb>担々麺</keb>
+<keb>担担麺</keb>
@@ -22,1 +22,1 @@
-<reb>タンタンメン</reb>
+<reb>タンタンめん</reb>
@@ -25,1 +25,2 @@
-<reb>タンタンめん</reb>
+<reb>タンタンメン</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>

http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/担担麺

Front spelling 担担麺, which is most correct (as Chinese borrowing, shouldn’t use 々).

@@ -5,1 +5,1 @@
-<keb>担々麺</keb>
+<keb>担担麺</keb>
@@ -8,1 +8,1 @@
-<keb>担担麺</keb>
+<keb>担々麺</keb>

wiki

submission from nils

@@ -10,0 +10,11 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>タンタン麺</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>坦々麺</keb>
+<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>坦坦麺</keb>
+<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
@@ -11,1 +22,4 @@
-<reb>たんたんめん</reb>
+<reb>タンタンメン</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>タンタンめん</reb>
@@ -16,1 +30,1 @@
-<gloss>Szechuan dish of noodles covered with a sauce of sesame paste and chile oil</gloss>
+<gloss>Szechuan dish of noodles covered with a sauce of sesame paste and chili oil</gloss>

https://www.wenthere8this.com/tan-tan-ramen/

It seems the Japanese dish might be considered its own thing inspired by the original.

@@ -29,0 +30 @@
+<field>&food;</field>
@@ -31 +32,2 @@
-<gloss>Szechuan dish of noodles covered with a sauce of sesame paste and chili oil</gloss>
+<gloss>tan tan ramen</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">Szechuan dish of noodles covered with a sauce of sesame paste and chili oil</gloss>

担々麺	152204 <- GG5
担担麺	31362 <- Daijirin
タンタン麺	51145
坦々麺	283119
坦坦麺	27766 <- ルミナス
擔擔麵	40

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/担担麺
https://www.moedict.tw/擔擔麵

@@ -30 +30 @@
-<lsource xml:lang="chi">dan dan mian</lsource>
+<lsource xml:lang="chi">dàndànmiàn</lsource>

We tend to do it on Google hits, and 担々麺 is far more common.

@@ -5,1 +5,1 @@
-<keb>担担麺</keb>
+<keb>担々麺</keb>
@@ -8,1 +8,1 @@
-<keb>担々麺</keb>
+<keb>担担麺</keb>
@@ -22,1 +22,1 @@
-<reb>タンタンメン</reb>
+<reb>タンタンめん</reb>
@@ -25,1 +25,2 @@
-<reb>タンタンめん</reb>
+<reb>タンタンメン</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>

芝麻醤	11131
チーマージャン	1650 - GG5, etc.
ジーマージャン	163 - Daijr
Wikip has both

@@ -8,0 +9,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ジーマージャン</reb>

《现代汉语词典》 for official pinyin orthography

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<lsource xml:lang="chi">zhi ma jiang</lsource>
+<lsource xml:lang="chi">zhīmajiàng</lsource>

Entry created

https://www.moedict.tw/上湯

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<lsource xml:lang="chi">shang tang</lsource>
+<lsource xml:lang="chi">shàngtāng</lsource>

Ngrams.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

Entry created

daijr

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1369510">人力車</xref>

《现代汉语词典》
《教育部重編國語辭典修訂本》 https://www.moedict.tw/洋車

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<lsource xml:lang="chi">yangche</lsource>
+<lsource xml:lang="chi">yángchē</lsource>

Entry created

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/棒棒鶏

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<lsource xml:lang="chi">bang bang ji</lsource>
+<lsource xml:lang="chi">bàngbàngjī</lsource>

Entry created

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twice-cooked_pork
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/回鍋肉 (i think the japanese wikipedia is mistaken to capitalize the 'h')

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<lsource xml:lang="chi">hui guo rou</lsource>
+<lsource xml:lang="chi">huíguōròu</lsource>

Entry created

GG5 has ホーコーズ.

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>ホーコーツ</reb>
+<reb>ホーコーズ</reb>
@@ -11 +11 @@
-<reb>ホーコーズ</reb>
+<reb>ホーコーツ</reb>
@@ -15 +15 @@
-<lsource xml:lang="chi">huo guo zi</lsource>
+<lsource xml:lang="chi">huoguozi</lsource>

火鍋子	459
ホーコーツ	No matches // daijr, daijs
ホーコーズ	134 // https://kotobank.jp/word/ホーコーズ(火鍋子)-132910

@@ -9,0 +10,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ホーコーズ</reb>
+</r_ele>

Entry created

甜麺醤	22293
甜面醤	8004

甜面醤	8004

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>甜面醤</keb>

《现代汉语词典》 for official pinyin orthography (no space between syllables)
https://www.moedict.tw/甜麵醬 for reference

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<lsource xml:lang="chi">tian mian jiang</lsource>
+<lsource xml:lang="chi">tiánmiànjiàng</lsource>

Entry created

《现代汉语词典》 for official pinyin orthography (no space)
https://www.moedict.tw/皮蛋

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<lsource xml:lang="chi">pi dan</lsource>
+<lsource xml:lang="chi">pídàn</lsource>

Entry created

@@ -19 +19 @@
-<lsource xml:lang="eng">wet tissue</lsource>
+<lsource ls_wasei="y">wet tissue</lsource>

maybe we don't need to call it wasei, but it 
doesn't seem that common in English

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<lsource xml:lang="eng">wet tissue</lsource>
@@ -22 +22,0 @@
-<gloss>wet tissue</gloss>

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>ウェット・ティッシュ</reb>
+<reb>ウエットティッシュ</reb>
@@ -11 +11 @@
-<reb>ウエットティッシュ</reb>
+<reb>ウェット・ティッシュ</reb>

ＫＯＤ追加語彙

@@ -19,1 +19,0 @@
-<lsource ls_wasei="y">wet tissue</lsource>
@@ -23,0 +22,1 @@
+<gloss>wet tissue</gloss>

i think the wasei can be omitted.  koj and gakken katakana don't have it, and it seems to get plenty of relevant hits in english

@@ -21 +21 @@
-<gloss>tax paid to avoid forced labor (ritsuryo period)</gloss>
+<gloss>tax paid to avoid forced labor (ritsuryō period)</gloss>

@@ -19,0 +20 @@
+<misc>&hist;</misc>

よう can only be associated with 庸, so it needn't be a restriction.

@@ -20,0 +21 @@
+<gloss>tax in kind</gloss>
@@ -23 +23,0 @@
-<stagk>庸</stagk>

daijr, daijs, nikk: https://kotobank.jp/word/庸-652672

@@ -21,0 +22,7 @@
+<sense>
+<stagk>庸</stagk>
+<stagr>よう</stagr>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&obs;</misc>
+<gloss>mediocrity</gloss>
+</sense>