〈御／お〉〈墨／すみ／スミ〉〈付（き）／つき／ツキ〉を

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ お墨付きを　 │ 65,586 │ 92.3% │
│ お墨つきを　 │  2,309 │  3.2% │ - add, sK
│ 御墨付きを　 │  1,269 │  1.8% │
│ お墨付を　　 │    970 │  1.4% │ - add, sK
│ 御墨付を　　 │    220 │  0.3% │
│ おスミ付きを │     37 │  0.1% │
│ 御墨つきを　 │     24 │  0.0% │
│ おすみつきを │    600 │  0.8% │
│ おスミつきを │     40 │  0.1% │
╰─ーーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -7,0 +8,4 @@
+<keb>お墨つき</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -8,0 +13,4 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>お墨付</keb>

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

@@ -28 +28 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1521680">墨付き・2</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1521680">墨付き・3</xref>

Seems OK. I'll align 墨付き.

@@ -16,2 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>handwriting</gloss>
-<gloss>autograph</gloss>
+<gloss>certificate</gloss>
+<gloss>certified document</gloss>
@@ -23,4 +23,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1521680">墨付き・2</xref>
-<gloss>certificate</gloss>
-<gloss>certified document</gloss>
-<gloss>paper with signature of the shogun or lord</gloss>
+<gloss>(the) thumbs up</gloss>
+<gloss>seal of approval</gloss>
@@ -30,2 +28,3 @@
-<gloss>seal of approval</gloss>
-<gloss>(the) thumbs up</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1521680">墨付き・2</xref>
+<s_inf>original meaning</s_inf>
+<gloss>paper with signature of the shogun or lord</gloss>

I was keen to keep a plain "at" sense as well for cases like アットホーム and アットバット, but on the checking the n-grams I agree they are outliers. That said I think it's useful for text glossing and segmentation purposes. I have put it into a specials file for WWWJDIC but perhaps it can be considered as a second sense here.

daijs:
  １ 単価…で、…につきの意を表す記号。単価記号。
  ２ 電子メールのアドレスで、ユーザー名とドメイン名の間を区切る符号。アットマーク。

I agree with dropping あっと and the lsrc tag.
I also don't think we need a general "at" sense. The number of expressions containing "アット" is very small, and we have separate entries for them.
The only ref that has アット/at is daijs, and both senses refer to the @ sign.

@@ -9,3 +9,4 @@
-<pos>&unc;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="1016570">アットホーム</xref>
-<gloss>at</gloss>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2020550">アットマーク</xref>
+<gloss>@ sign</gloss>
+<gloss>at sign</gloss>

and the lsrc tag probably also unneeded?  i don't know of any other english entries that have one

@@ -11 +10,0 @@
-<lsource xml:lang="eng"/>

I don't think the note is needed.

@@ -11 +10,0 @@
-<s_inf>occ. あっと</s_inf>

i'm not sure even the note is needed

what's the purpose of the lsrc tag?

gg5, prog

I don't think the x-ref is needed.

@@ -28,2 +28 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2198900">持ち越し・1</xref>
-<gloss>to carry over</gloss>
+<gloss>to carry over (an issue, decision, work, etc.)</gloss>
@@ -31 +30,2 @@
-<gloss>to keep (for later)</gloss>
+<gloss>to put off</gloss>
+<gloss>to postpone</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 持ち越す │ 40,163 │ 96.8% │
│ 持越す　 │    441 │  1.1% │ 🡠 adding (daijr/s, shinmeikai)
│ 持ちこす │    345 │  0.8% │ 🡠 adding
│ もち越す │     54 │  0.1% │ 🡠 adding
│ もちこす │    509 │  1.2% │
╰─ーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -7,0 +8,11 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>持越す</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>持ちこす</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>もち越す</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2198900">持ち越し</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2198900">持ち越し・1</xref>

gg5, prog, Wisdom

See comments on 1306660.
My JEs only have "bishop".

@@ -18,6 +17,0 @@
-<gloss>prelate</gloss>
-<gloss>primate</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<gloss>episcopal</gloss>

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1306660">司教</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1306660">司教・1</xref>

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2271790">第一回・1</xref>
@@ -22 +23 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2271790">第一回</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2271790">第一回・2</xref>

gg5, prog, daij

I don't think there's a computing sense for just "初期".

@@ -19,9 +19,5 @@
-<gloss>early (days)</gloss>
-<gloss>initial stage</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="1342640">初期化・1</xref>
-<field>&comp;</field>
-<gloss>initial</gloss>
+<gloss>early days</gloss>
+<gloss>early years</gloss>
+<gloss>early stages</gloss>
+<gloss>initial stages</gloss>
+<gloss>beginning</gloss>

@@ -25 +25 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1342640">初期化</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1342640">初期化・1</xref>

Bulk convert ling to gramm
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<field>&ling;</field>
+<field>&gramm;</field>
@@ -18 +18 @@
-<field>&ling;</field>
+<field>&gramm;</field>

I think it's best with the qualification.

@@ -19 +19 @@
-<gloss>auxiliary verb</gloss>
+<gloss>auxiliary verb (in languages other than Japanese)</gloss>

i think the parenthesized info should stay.  i'd be fine with "(in other languages than Japanese)", but just "(in other languages)" works for me too

I don't like comments etc. that reference a previous sense, i.e. "(in other languages)" is a reference to sense 1's "(in Japanese)".
It's probably not needed at all, but if it should stay, I think it should be (in other languages than Japanese)"

@@ -19 +19 @@
-<gloss>auxiliary verb (in other languages)</gloss>
+<gloss>auxiliary verb</gloss>

Then the [expl] is no longer necessary. The [see] can be omitted too, since we face a choice between 補助動詞 ("auxiliary verb (in Japanese)") and 付属語 ("dependent word").
I wonder if sense 1 can be just "bound auxiliary (in Japanese)". Some 助動詞 like ます and た are words in traditional Japanese grammar but suffixes to westerners, so it's better to sidestep the issue.

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1514640">補助動詞</xref>
@@ -21 +19,0 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">verb forming the mood, tense, etc. of other verbs</gloss>

@@ -32 +32 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2228290">姓・かばね</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2228290">姓・かばね・1</xref>

gg5, daij

I don't think "persecution" is quite right.

@@ -24 +23,0 @@
-<gloss>persecution</gloss>

Daijr, GG5, 中辞典 (all split senses)

@@ -15,0 +16,8 @@
+<gloss>responsibility</gloss>
+<gloss>liability</gloss>
+<gloss>blame</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>torture</gloss>
+<gloss>torment</gloss>
@@ -17,2 +24,0 @@
-<gloss>blame</gloss>
-<gloss>responsibility</gloss>

まえつぼ is correctly written as 前壺, so this sense is correctly written as 壺.  so if anything, this belongs as a sense of 壺 with 坪 as [iK].  however, this sense of 壺 doesn't seem to appear in any kokugo and it's not clear that it's common enough to be worth recording, so i would probably pass on it

https://www.gofuku-kawachiya.co.jp/diary/1041
https://search.rakuten.co.jp/search/mall/坪下がり+草履/

More evidence of usage.

I have a problem with this edit. Only that quoted source has 坪/つぼ with that meaning. It doesn't have that meaning in any kokugo or kanwa that I have checked. Also, the kokugos have 7 or 8 senses for 坪/つぼ which we don't because (a) no-one has proposed them, and (b) they're fairly rare. If we were to add this sense, I'd want to see the ones in the kokugos put in ahead of it. I've just approved 前つぼ without 坪 because it couldn't really be verified. I'll wait a short while, but I think this sense can't go in solo and certainly without better support.

https://bbth.co.jp/kisste/post-2070

@@ -18,0 +19,5 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2843424">前坪</xref>
+<gloss>frontal strap of a Japanese sandal</gloss>
+</sense>

I don't think units of measurement are counters too.

@@ -16 +15,0 @@
-<pos>&ctr;</pos>

Bulk update: Adjusting POS details
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -13 +13,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

GG5

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<gloss>kaleidoscopic</gloss>

saito, gg5 https://ejje.weblio.jp/content/変幻自在

For the shape-shifting gloss, compare https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=63MEREmY_Hw with https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4iBU_D36-AA

@@ -15,0 +16,2 @@
+<gloss>protean</gloss>
+<gloss>shape-shifting</gloss>

Kanji Haitani list

Adding yoji tagAdding yoji tag
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<misc>&yoji;</misc>

Aligning.

@@ -16,3 +16,3 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1002680">お墨付き・1</xref>
-<gloss>handwriting</gloss>
-<gloss>autograph</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1002680">お墨付き・おすみつき・1</xref>
+<gloss>certificate</gloss>
+<gloss>certified document</gloss>
@@ -24,3 +24,7 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1002680">お墨付き・2</xref>
-<gloss>certificate</gloss>
-<gloss>certified document</gloss>
+<gloss>(the) thumbs up</gloss>
+<gloss>seal of approval</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1002680">お墨付き・おすみつき・3</xref>
+<s_inf>original meaning</s_inf>

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1002680">お墨付き</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1002680">お墨付き・1</xref>
@@ -23,0 +24 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1002680">お墨付き・2</xref>

GG5: わじょう【和上･和尚】

Seems that restriction on わじょう is not needed.

@@ -25 +24,0 @@
-<re_restr>和尚</re_restr>

koj daij

https://www.nhk.or.jp/bunken/summary/kotoba/gimon/040.html
一般的に寺の住職などをいう「和尚（さん）」は、宗派にかかわらず[オショー（サン）]と言っています。...
現在、日常の呼称としての「和尚」は、寺の内部でも必ずしも宗派による言い分けは行われていません。また、寺の内部では位階・役職によって呼ぶのが普通で、「和尚」が用いられ
ることは少ないようです。そこで、放送では（1）一般的に寺の住職などを指す場合は、宗派に関係なく[オショー（サン）] と言っています。（2）「○○和尚」という形で歴史上の僧
りょを言うときは、各宗派の慣用に従って次のようにしています。

chujiten keeps it simple: a Buddhist priest (in charge of a temple).


和尚	381072
和尚さん	72831

@@ -24,0 +25 @@
+<re_restr>和尚</re_restr>
@@ -27 +27,0 @@
-<stagr>おしょう</stagr>
@@ -28,0 +29 @@
+<field>&Buddh;</field>
@@ -30,19 +31,3 @@
-<gloss>preceptor or high priest (esp. in Zen or Pure Land Buddhism)</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<stagr>かしょう</stagr>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<misc>&hon;</misc>
-<gloss>preceptor or high priest (in Tendai or Kegon Buddhism)</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<stagr>わじょう</stagr>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<misc>&hon;</misc>
-<s_inf>usu. 和上</s_inf>
-<gloss>preceptor or high priest (in Shingon, Hosso, Ritsu or Shin Buddhism)</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="1805390">法眼・2</xref>
-<gloss>second highest priestly rank in Buddhism</gloss>
+<s_inf>trad. pronounced おしょう in Zen and Pure Land, かしょう in Tendai and Kegon, わじょう in Shingon, Hosso, Ritsu and Shin Buddhism</s_inf>
+<gloss>priestly teacher</gloss>
+<gloss>preceptor</gloss>
@@ -53,0 +39 @@
+<field>&Buddh;</field>
@@ -54,0 +41,8 @@
+<gloss>priest</gloss>
+<gloss>head priest</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1805390">法眼・2</xref>
+<field>&Buddh;</field>
+<gloss>second highest priestly rank in Buddhism</gloss>

@@ -47 +47 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1805390">法眼</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1805390">法眼・2</xref>

JE examples all in kana.

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

daijr, daijs, nikk: https://kotobank.jp/word/餞-441380

I wonder why the せん reading is entered as 餞す or 餞する in the kokugos, even when all examples are sahen

@@ -12,0 +13,4 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>せん</reb>
+<re_restr>餞</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
@@ -15 +19 @@
-<s_inf>sometimes written 鼻向け</s_inf>
+<s_inf>はなむけ is from 馬の鼻向け</s_inf>

daij, meikyo, gg5

@@ -17 +17,4 @@
-<gloss>nothing at all</gloss>
+<s_inf>with neg. verb</s_inf>
+<gloss>(not) anything</gloss>
+<gloss>(nothing) at all</gloss>
+<gloss>(not) any</gloss>

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1188490">何も</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1188490">何も・1</xref>

https://oshiete.goo.ne.jp/qa/10163010.html
マジな質問かい
普は　普通預金のこと
当は　当座預金のこと

@@ -23,0 +24,6 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1784130">当座預金</xref>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<gloss>checking account</gloss>

gg5, daijr

I think this is better for sense 1.
Glosses should be nouns for sense 2.

@@ -13,2 +13,4 @@
-<gloss>this (business organisation, place, etc.)</gloss>
-<gloss>the said</gloss>
+<gloss>this</gloss>
+<gloss>our</gloss>
+<gloss>the ... in question</gloss>
+<gloss>the said ...</gloss>
@@ -20,3 +22,2 @@
-<gloss>just</gloss>
-<gloss>proper</gloss>
-<gloss>fair</gloss>
+<gloss>justice</gloss>
+<gloss>fairness</gloss>

I agree.

@@ -17,7 +16,0 @@
-<sense>
-<pos>&aux-v;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="2654250">た・1</xref>
-<s_inf>older attributive form of た</s_inf>
-<gloss>did</gloss>
-<gloss>(have) done</gloss>
-</sense>

that's the 連体形 of sense 5 of 2029060.  none of the kokugos have this as a separate entry, and i don't think it's needed

has some currency
限られたる	495	  
限られたるもの	42	  
限られたる範囲	28	  
限られたる予算	22	 
老いたる	11821	  
老いたる霊長類	1196	
現れたる	3259	  
現れたる国民	167

@@ -16,0 +17,7 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&aux-v;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2654250">た・1</xref>
+<s_inf>older attributive form of た</s_inf>
+<gloss>did</gloss>
+<gloss>(have) done</gloss>
+</sense>

I don't understand just what "often used in relation to qualifications and requirements for a position" is supposed to mean stuck in 
between two different actual glosses but it seems like it should be in the note to me

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<s_inf>after a noun, usu. as 〜たる者, etc.</s_inf>
+<s_inf>after a noun, usu. as 〜たる者, etc.; often used in relation to qualifications and requirements for a position</s_inf>
@@ -15 +14,0 @@
-<gloss>often used in relation to qualifications and requirements for a position</gloss>

I don't think the x-ref is needed.

@@ -15,2 +14,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2170870">何処にも・1</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2170870">何処にも・1</xref>

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2170870">何処にも</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2170870">何処にも・1</xref>

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos>

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<gloss>elder brother</gloss>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1001830">お兄さん</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1001830">お兄さん・1</xref>

Sigh. OK.

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<misc>&fam;</misc>

I think the n-suf sense is worth recording 
(also for ねえ）. it's not always followed 
by さん when used like that, suffixed to a 
name e.g. ”隆兄” takashinii

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1066390">ジョッキ</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1066390">ジョッキ・1</xref>

Entry created

Bulk update n-adv to n,adv
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -19 +19,2 @@
-<pos>&n-adv;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>

Bulk update n-adv to n,adv
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -14 +14,2 @@
-<pos>&n-adv;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>

Bulk update: Removal of n-t POS
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -15 +14,0 @@
-<pos>&n-t;</pos>
@@ -20 +18,0 @@
-<pos>&n-t;</pos>

@@ -21 +21 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1479130">半季</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1479130">半季・1</xref>

Entry created

Thinking more about it, I feel it should just go. Starting entries with ずに, ないでは, etc. is not what we do any more.

i'm not saying we necessarily to change/delete this but i'd argue that almost all of the entries we have like ずにはおかない, ないではおかない are the kind of entries we used to let in but which are inconsistent with our current 'style'.

since ずには置かない gets the parsing wrong (it's [[[[X+ず]に]は]置かない], not X+[ずには置かない]), it seems like our current style would suggest that we should have an entry for 置かない with a note on usage or just mention it in the entry for 置く

temp approve

ずにはおかない	15171
ないではおかない	824
---
ないではいられない	17974
ずには居られない	16003
ずにはいられない	542734

The reference also has the ~ずには version, which is about 20 times more common. I think that is more suitable as an entry, however I'm not totally convinced it's needed.
We have entries for ないではいられない and ずにはいられない, which are more common. I've matched their style.
I also think this is just one sense.

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>ないでは置かない</keb>
+<keb>ずには置かない</keb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>ないではおかない</reb>
+<reb>ずにはおかない</reb>
@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
@@ -12,0 +14 @@
+<s_inf>after neg. verb stem</s_inf>
@@ -15,4 +16,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&exp;</pos>
-<misc>&uk;</misc>

P113-どんな時どう使う日本語表現文型辞典 http://jlptdictionary.com/viewentry.php?intEntryID=17382

By itself it's not really a word.

@@ -17 +16,0 @@
-<gloss>nofilter</gloss>

#加工なし=#nofilter
加工なし=nofilter

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss>#nofilter</gloss>
+<gloss>nofilter</gloss>

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<s_inf>esp. hashtag on Twitter and Instagram</s_inf>
+<s_inf>esp. as a hashtag on Twitter and Instagram</s_inf>

加工なし	17342
加工無し	9484

N-gram counts seem remarkably high.

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>加工無し</keb>
@@ -12,2 +15,4 @@
-<s_inf>esp. as a hashtag</s_inf>
-<gloss>no filter (i.e. on a photo)</gloss>
+<s_inf>esp. hashtag on Twitter and Instagram</s_inf>
+<gloss>no filter (photo)</gloss>
+<gloss>#nofilter</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="lit">without processing</gloss>

see twitter/instagram. #nofilter is a 
popular hashtag, as is 加工なし

JLD, https://www.proz.com/kudoz/japanese-to-english/geography/816227-賃加工.html
賃加工	2029

日本国語大辞典 https://kotobank.jp/word/賃加工-2062663
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piece_work

Not a noun. Difficult to gloss.

@@ -13 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>funny situation but forced to hold back laughter</gloss>
+<gloss>being unable to laugh (at a funny but serious situation)</gloss>
+<gloss>forced to hold back laughter</gloss>

https://hinative.com/ja/questions/5329212
https://forum.wordreference.com/threads/笑うに笑えない.1781786/
GG5: (笑う entry) 相手が社長だから笑うに笑えなかった． I had to force myself to hold back my laughter as I was dealing with the CEO.
Eijiro: 笑うに笑えず : with suppressed mirth
笑うに笑えない	12712
笑うに笑えず	1255

Been open too long.

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>laughable but cannot to laugh because of grave situation</gloss>
+<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
+<gloss>funny situation but forced to hold back laughter</gloss>

@@ -11,2 +11,2 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>laughable but cannot to laugh because grave situation</gloss>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<gloss>laughable but cannot to laugh because of grave situation</gloss>

https://www.weblio.jp/content/笑うに笑えない

笑うに笑えない」の意味は笑おうとしても笑うことができない、といった意味

OK

I don't think that should be a usage note, 
but part of the definition itself.
(it's not about usage, really)

@@ -12,2 +12 @@
-<s_inf>esp. for children and old people</s_inf>
-<gloss>party</gloss>
+<gloss>party (esp. for children or the elderly)</gloss>

Wiki: お楽しみ会（おたのしみかい）とは、子供会・保育所・幼稚園・小学校・老人ホームなどで行われるパーティーの一種で
ある。

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<s_inf>esp. for children and old people</s_inf>

Wikipedia and Gogle images

I think this should mention taht it's for children and held in a school class or similar

RP
お楽しみ会	69532

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>funfest</gloss>

After the discussion on 坪, I think this perhaps should be recorded, but it's irregular.

@@ -12,0 +13,4 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>前坪</keb>
+<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>

前つぼ	928 <- sandal straps
前壺	132
前壷	130
前坪	1158 <- mostly scenes in China

Safest tp drop 前坪 altogether.

@@ -13,3 +12,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>前坪</keb>
-</k_ele>

https://bbth.co.jp/kisste/post-2070
daijr https://kotobank.jp/word/前壺・前壷-386517
http://www.so-bien.com/kimono/用語/前坪.html
http://www.so-bien.com/kimono/用語/前つぼ.html

前坪 is not in the dictionaries, it might be iK

Very marginal. If it wasn't for the Daijirin appearance I'd drop it.

http://www.iwami.gr.jp/reiki_int/reiki_honbun/m007RG00000195.html
"私語、雑語又は拍手等をすること"

The 雑語 in that link is unrelated to the 雑語 in daijr. I'm not sure how I'd translate ("various words", maybe?) it but 雑 has its regular meaning of "various" or "miscellaneous". It was probably coined by the author of the column.
There are a few other instances of 雑語 on the web, none of which mean "foul language" as far as I can tell. In the link above it appears to refer to "chatting" (i.e. 雑談).
That's why I wonder if this entry is actually helpful. These other meanings not supported by any dictionary are probably too obscure to add as senses, but the daijr meaning we have here is even more obscure.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<misc>&obsc;</misc>
+<misc>&obs;</misc>

FWIW, I saw it here first https://www.nikkeyshimbun.jp/rensai/2006-esp/2006rensai-izumi

This is so obscure that the only example I can find is the one given in daijr (from 1908). Not sure we even need it as an entry.

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<misc>&obsc;</misc>

官製メディア	371

Seems to be used a lot in the context of the Chinese media.

https://d.hatena.ne.jp/keyword/官製メディア

政府等の権力側のメディア

The 悟り is a bit sarcastic, but yes, I think that actually works.

@@ -16 +15,0 @@
-<gloss>millennial generation lacking ambition and material desire</gloss>
@@ -17,0 +17 @@
+<gloss g_type="expl">millennial generation lacking ambition and material desire</gloss>

Doesn't it make less sense as a second gloss? It makes more "dictionarial" sense to 
me to lead with something slightly opaque (but more literal) and then follow it up 
with an explanation, than the other way around.

OK, but not as first gloss, and an xref to give a bit of context for the term.

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1270850">悟る・さとる・3</xref>
@@ -15,0 +17 @@
+<gloss>enlightened generation</gloss>

They are "enlightened" (さとってる) in the Buddhist sense - that's why they "lack ambition and 
material desire".

0 n-grams

I don't think that first gloss helped at all. Ordered on Googits.

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>悟り世代</keb>
+<keb>さとり世代</keb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<keb>さとり世代</keb>
+<keb>悟り世代</keb>
@@ -15 +14,0 @@
-<gloss>the enlightened generation</gloss>

I don't think the x-refs are needed.

@@ -13 +12,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1154170">安堵・3</xref>
@@ -20 +18,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1154170">安堵・1</xref>

Koj, JLD, 0 n-grams

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<misc>&arch;</misc>
@@ -19,0 +21 @@
+<misc>&arch;</misc>

daijr, daijs: https://kotobank.jp/word/堵に安んずる-579162
nikk: https://kotobank.jp/word/堵に安んず-2065969

堵の如し	22

Possibly arch/quote (晋書)

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<misc>&obsc;</misc>

daijr, daijs, nikk: https://kotobank.jp/word/堵の如し-579163

"死語かどうかは、「わかりま千円」" - very cute.
And 10 years ago it was being described as possibly 死語?

yes, it must be.

the other example on that page (死語かどうかは、「わかりま千円」) reminds me of when my coworker used to say おつかれさマンコ at the end of the day.

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<reb>ありがとう</reb>
+<reb>ありがじゅっぴき</reb>

unless maybe ありがじゅっぴき is the point of the joke?  (forcing the reader/listener to figure out what you mean?)
https://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q1131220311

十匹 is じゅっぴき, not とうひき.  i agree that 蟻が十匹 is likely to be pronounced ありがとう, with とう being a gikun reading of 十匹.

i also agree that we may not need this entry, although we do have a number of other 'internet wordplay' entries similar to this

As absurd as it sounds, I think the 匹 probably is pronounced. On Twitter, there are plenty of hits for "蟻が10" (without the 匹).
But I question whether we even need this as an entry. Wordplay of this sort is extremely common on the Japanese internet and very little of it is worth recording in a dictionary.

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1586820">有り難う・ありがとう</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1586820">ありがとう</xref>

I prefer this.

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<gloss>stupid people who are easily influenced by mass media</gloss>
+<gloss>low-IQ people who are easily influenced by mass media</gloss>

Since it's derog, there's no need to beat around the bush

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<gloss>less intelligent individuals who are easily influenced by mass media</gloss>
+<gloss>stupid people who are easily influenced by mass media</gloss>

https://d.hatena.ne.jp/keyword/B層  also

I think a suitable note would end up being too long.

GG5, LSD, 医学英和辞典

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/クッバ
クッバ	187
クッベ	183
キッベ	82
キッバ	No matches

@@ -3,0 +4,6 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>クッバ</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>クッベ</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -12,0 +19 @@
+<lsource xml:lang="ara"/>

I've flagged it as an issue. If we are to cover キビ/kibbeh it would need to be in its own entry, as we don't mix dialect and regular terms in the one entry.

It's コロニア語, based on the Portuguese pronunciation. Another instance in which a dialect tag would be helpful.

キッベ	82
キビ	321206
キッバ	< 20  <- in the EJs for "kibbeh"

キビ is millet. I think the Nikkey Shimbun has either got the word wrong, or Brazilian Japanese is way out of step.

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>キビ</reb>
+<reb>キッバ</reb>

GG5, ルミナス

Love the reading.

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>ぶとうざん</reb>
+<reb>どういん</reb>
@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1154320">あん摩・あんま・1</xref>

daijr etc https://kotobank.jp/word/導引-103110
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tao_yin

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

daijr: "実例をあげること。"

Doesn't refer to the example itself.

@@ -14 +13,0 @@
-<gloss>example</gloss>

ルミナス, Koj

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<gloss>illustration</gloss>

daijr, 新明解

In JMdict. Not a named entity.

Adding spec1
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

GG5, 中辞典

Carnaval is the original title (from French).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/An_American_Tail

Not a typo.

Adding spec1
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

Daijr,
アメリカ物語	3780
あめりか物語	3556
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/アメリカ物語

Not the same as あめりか物語 (qv).

Adding spec1
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

 fuu to fū conversion
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>An American Tale (collection of stories by Nagai Kafuu, 1908)</gloss>
+<gloss>An American Tale (collection of stories by Nagai Kafū, 1908)</gloss>

The year 1908, not 1908 separate stories.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>An American Tale (1908 stories by Nagai Kafuu)</gloss>
+<gloss>An American Tale (collection of stories by Nagai Kafuu, 1908)</gloss>

Daijr,
アメリカ物語	3780
あめりか物語	3556
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/アメリカ物語

Not the same as アメリカ物語 (qv).