No n-grams or refs. Top web hits are all jmdict spawn.

@@ -6,4 +5,0 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>偽似症</keb>
-<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>

I don't think it adds anything.

I think "of" or "of a" works better?
(as in Nicolas' original submission)

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss>suspected case (disease)</gloss>
+<gloss>suspected case (of a disease)</gloss>

GG5, Koj
偽似症	< 20
疑似症	1760

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>偽似症</keb>
+<keb>疑似症</keb>
@@ -8 +8,2 @@
-<keb>疑似症</keb>
+<keb>偽似症</keb>
+<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>
@@ -15 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>suspected case (of a disease)</gloss>
+<field>&med;</field>
+<gloss>suspected case (disease)</gloss>

mk 2 senses

@@ -18,0 +19,2 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

Thanks

gg5, daij, meikyo
daijr: "戦時体制下などで，法律により食糧・物資などを政府が民間に一定価格で半強制的に売り渡させること。「米を―する」「―制度」"

I think we need to expand this a little. Most of the kokugos have two senses but that might be excessive.

@@ -19 +19,2 @@
-<gloss>delivery (e.g. of rice to the government)</gloss>
+<gloss>obligatory supply (of goods to the government, e.g. during wartime)</gloss>
+<gloss>delivery (to the government at a fixed price, e.g. of rice)</gloss>

Probably "hist".

daijr, daijs, nikk: https://kotobank.jp/word/供出-478317

@@ -19 +19 @@
-<gloss>delivery</gloss>
+<gloss>delivery (e.g. of rice to the government)</gloss>

I don't think we need an adj-no sense here. The JEs give many different translations for "episcopal" and "pontifical".
"prelate" isn't in my refs.

@@ -18,6 +17,0 @@
-<gloss>prelate</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<gloss>episcopal</gloss>
-<gloss>pontifical</gloss>

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1325280">主教</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1325280">主教・1</xref>

@@ -23 +23 @@
-<gloss>potifical</gloss>
+<gloss>pontifical</gloss>

gg5, prog

@@ -27 +27 @@
-<s_inf>with a verb in negative form</s_inf>
+<s_inf>with neg. verb</s_inf>
@@ -28,0 +29,2 @@
+<gloss>after all</gloss>
+<gloss>never (happened)</gloss>

->note

@@ -26,1 +26,3 @@
-<gloss>(with neg) in the end</gloss>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<s_inf>with a verb in negative form</s_inf>
+<gloss>in the end</gloss>

gg5, daij

I don't think "persecution" is quite right.

@@ -24 +23,0 @@
-<gloss>persecution</gloss>

Daijr, GG5, 中辞典 (all split senses)

@@ -15,0 +16,8 @@
+<gloss>responsibility</gloss>
+<gloss>liability</gloss>
+<gloss>blame</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>torture</gloss>
+<gloss>torment</gloss>
@@ -17,2 +24,0 @@
-<gloss>blame</gloss>
-<gloss>responsibility</gloss>

I raised this on the Honyaku list. No-one supported the せつ reading. I could move it over to the 切り entry, but 切 alone is "io" there. Maybe best just to leave a note here. It's all a bit marginal.

@@ -29,0 +30 @@
+<s_inf>also きり</s_inf>

gg5 does have this sense 2.  i previously rejected it.  are we sure this is actually pronounced せつ on a switch?  i always thought it was きり without the okurigana.  obviously i could be wrong though

Daijr, GG5 (sense 2)

To be frank I think せち would be better off in its own "arch" entry and cross-referenced here where appropriate. The overlap (according to Daijirin) is not that precise and all the refs are 源氏物語/宇津保物語/etc.

@@ -14,3 +13,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>せち</reb>
-</r_ele>
@@ -19,0 +17,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1953140">切に</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2153050">切なる</xref>
@@ -26,0 +26,6 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&int;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1384830">切る・3</xref>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<gloss>OFF (on switch)</gloss>
+</sense>

great semantic overlap between せち and せつ:
https://kotobank.jp/word/切-171115
14 quotations in aozora:
https://furigana.info/w/切:せち

@@ -13,0 +14,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>せち</reb>
+</r_ele>

mk

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -24,0 +26 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

gg5, prog, daij, etc.

None of my refs have a "herald" sense. I think that's only 先駆け.

@@ -17 +16,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -18,0 +18 @@
+<gloss>precursor</gloss>
@@ -20 +20 @@
-<gloss>precursor</gloss>
+<gloss>leader</gloss>
@@ -25,8 +24,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="1392790">前駆・2</xref>
-<gloss>herald</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<pos>&vs;</pos>
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -35 +27 @@
-<gloss>pilot car</gloss>
+<gloss>outriding</gloss>

@@ -25,0 +26 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1392790">前駆・2</xref>
@@ -32 +33 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1392790">前駆</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1392790">前駆・1</xref>

prog

"herald" is in GG5 but I don't think it fits here.

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>leader</gloss>
@@ -16 +16,0 @@
-<gloss>herald</gloss>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/スウェーデン#国名
スイスと区別する場合はスウェーデンを「典」[17]、スイスを「瑞」と略する
https://www.jetro.go.jp/biz/areareports/2020/65bbf648f646f6cb.html

An example in the second link.

@@ -18,0 +19,6 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1067410">瑞典・スウェーデン</xref>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<gloss>Sweden</gloss>
+</sense>

they're two senses in the kokugos

@@ -13,0 +14,3 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>

@@ -19 +18,0 @@
-<gloss>calories</gloss>

Maybe this. (Joules are usually reserved for units of work, although they are related.)

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>quantity of heat</gloss>
+<gloss>quantity of heat (e.g. in calories, BTU, etc.)</gloss>

could we mention in the first gloss it can 
refer to Joule, kcal etc.?

quantity of heat (as measured in J, kcal, 
etc.)

or something.like that?

daijr: 二つの異なった物体の間を熱として移動するエネルギーの量。単位はジュールのほか，カロリーも用いる。
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/熱量

It's not just used in nutrition.

It's very commonly used in food labelling 
though? i wouldn't expect to see "quantities 
of heat" on an English-language food label

gg5

Not necessarily a verb (e.g. 必ずしも高くない)
We put "not" in brackets because the negation is handled by the verb/adjective.

@@ -18,5 +18,5 @@
-<s_inf>used with neg. verb</s_inf>
-<gloss>not always</gloss>
-<gloss>not necessarily</gloss>
-<gloss>not all</gloss>
-<gloss>not entirely</gloss>
+<s_inf>with neg. sentence</s_inf>
+<gloss>(not) always</gloss>
+<gloss>(not) necessarily</gloss>
+<gloss>(not) entirely</gloss>
+<gloss>(not) all</gloss>

Indeed.

djr;djs

According to the references, this is always used with negative 
verbs.

@@ -18,4 +18,5 @@
-<gloss>(not) always</gloss>
-<gloss>(not) necessarily</gloss>
-<gloss>(not) all</gloss>
-<gloss>(not) entirely</gloss>
+<s_inf>used with neg. verb</s_inf>
+<gloss>not always</gloss>
+<gloss>not necessarily</gloss>
+<gloss>not all</gloss>
+<gloss>not entirely</gloss>

[vi]: meikyo

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬───────╮
│ 抱腹　　 │ 6,343 │
│ 捧腹　　 │ 3,794 │
│ ほうふく │ 1,689 │
╰─ーーーー─┴───────╯

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

daij, meikyo
抱腹	6343
抱腹絶倒	109501	
抱腹な	36
抱腹の	564

Usually as 抱腹絶倒 in modern Japanese.

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -15,2 +16,3 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>convulsed with laughter</gloss>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1603380">抱腹絶倒</xref>
+<gloss>convulsions of laughter</gloss>

Correct POS order
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -17 +17,0 @@
-<pos>&vi;</pos>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

gg5

-> noun glosses

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -17,3 +18,3 @@
-<gloss>very funny</gloss>
-<gloss>laugh oneself into convulsions</gloss>
-<gloss>split one's sides laughing</gloss>
+<gloss>laughing oneself into convulsions</gloss>
+<gloss>splitting one's sides laughing</gloss>
+<gloss>rolling with laughter</gloss>

G n-grams: 
棒腹絶倒	31
抱腹絶倒	109501
捧腹絶倒	102
ほうふくぜっとう	248

棒腹絶倒 gets 37 WWW hits too. In theory it could stay with an "iK" tag, but probably best not here.

daijr, nikk: https://kotobank.jp/word/途-579159
gakken: 特に、ある目的をもって行く、旅の道程。

@@ -13,0 +14,4 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ど</reb>
+<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>
@@ -16,0 +21 @@
+<gloss>route</gloss>

A bit odd.

@@ -14 +13,0 @@
-<gloss>son of freedom</gloss>

Entry created

https://oshiete.goo.ne.jp/qa/10163010.html
マジな質問かい
普は　普通預金のこと
当は　当座預金のこと

@@ -23,0 +24,6 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1784130">当座預金</xref>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<gloss>checking account</gloss>

gg5, daijr

I think this is better for sense 1.
Glosses should be nouns for sense 2.

@@ -13,2 +13,4 @@
-<gloss>this (business organisation, place, etc.)</gloss>
-<gloss>the said</gloss>
+<gloss>this</gloss>
+<gloss>our</gloss>
+<gloss>the ... in question</gloss>
+<gloss>the said ...</gloss>
@@ -20,3 +22,2 @@
-<gloss>just</gloss>
-<gloss>proper</gloss>
-<gloss>fair</gloss>
+<gloss>justice</gloss>
+<gloss>fairness</gloss>

I agree.

@@ -17,7 +16,0 @@
-<sense>
-<pos>&aux-v;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="2654250">た・1</xref>
-<s_inf>older attributive form of た</s_inf>
-<gloss>did</gloss>
-<gloss>(have) done</gloss>
-</sense>

that's the 連体形 of sense 5 of 2029060.  none of the kokugos have this as a separate entry, and i don't think it's needed

has some currency
限られたる	495	  
限られたるもの	42	  
限られたる範囲	28	  
限られたる予算	22	 
老いたる	11821	  
老いたる霊長類	1196	
現れたる	3259	  
現れたる国民	167

@@ -16,0 +17,7 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&aux-v;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2654250">た・1</xref>
+<s_inf>older attributive form of た</s_inf>
+<gloss>did</gloss>
+<gloss>(have) done</gloss>
+</sense>

I don't understand just what "often used in relation to qualifications and requirements for a position" is supposed to mean stuck in 
between two different actual glosses but it seems like it should be in the note to me

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<s_inf>after a noun, usu. as 〜たる者, etc.</s_inf>
+<s_inf>after a noun, usu. as 〜たる者, etc.; often used in relation to qualifications and requirements for a position</s_inf>
@@ -15 +14,0 @@
-<gloss>often used in relation to qualifications and requirements for a position</gloss>

路チュー	878

https://mobile.twitter.com/search?q=路チュー&f=live

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<misc>&obsc;</misc>

Entry created

@@ -19 +19,2 @@
-<gloss>to fabricate (stories) (based on alleged behaviour of the Asahi newspaper)</gloss>
+<s_inf>based on alleged behaviour of the Asahi newspaper</s_inf>
+<gloss>to fabricate (stories)</gloss>

@@ -18,0 +18,1 @@
+<misc>&joc;</misc>

@@ -8,0 +8,3 @@
+<reb>あさひる</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -9,0 +12,1 @@
+<re_nokanji/>

Trimming & standardizing.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<s_inf>after a noun or adjective stem</s_inf>
+<s_inf>after a noun or adj. stem</s_inf>

Moving the second sense back to 1089950.

@@ -15,12 +14,0 @@
-<sense>
-<pos>&suf;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="1089950">ナウ</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1089950">ナウ</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1089950">ナウ</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1089950">ナウ</xref>
-<misc>&sl;</misc>
-<s_inf>from ナウ; esp. in status updates on social media</s_inf>
-<gloss>now doing ...</gloss>
-<gloss>in the middle of doing ...</gloss>
-<gloss>currently ...</gloss>
-</sense>

@@ -20,3 +20,3 @@
-<gloss>now doing...</gloss>
-<gloss>in the middle of doing...</gloss>
-<gloss>currently...</gloss>
+<gloss>now doing ...</gloss>
+<gloss>in the middle of doing ...</gloss>
+<gloss>currently ...</gloss>

OK, I think.

reopen, since this split was not exactly what was suggested.  (i.e., it was suggested that we give this sense of なう its own entry, but 2/3 rule suggests it should go here.)

フェジョアーダ	2903
フェジョアダ	No matches
フェイジョアーダ	4448
フェイジョアダ	63

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>フェイジョアーダ</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -8 +11 @@
-<reb>フェジョアダ</reb>
+<reb>フェイジョアダ</reb>
@@ -11 +14 @@
-<reb>フェイジョアーダ</reb>
+<reb>フェジョアダ</reb>

We don't usually explain food names.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feijoada
https://www.nikkeyshimbun.jp/2015/bom-apetite-03.html

@@ -9,0 +10,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>フェイジョアーダ</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -12 +15,3 @@
-<gloss>feijoada (Portuguese stew of beans with beef, pork, etc.)</gloss>
+<field>&food;</field>
+<gloss>feijoada</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">stew of beans with beef, pork, etc.</gloss>

Entry created

責めを負う	6551
責を負う	11344
の責めを負う	1974
の責を負う	4042
が責めを負う	642
が責を負う	1614

From the deleted 2843324.  It seems that many are writing this expression as 責を負う although it's not in the references and not the correct form of せめ.

@@ -5,0 +6,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>責を負う</keb>
+<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>

Aligning.

@@ -13,0 +14,3 @@
+<gloss>to take responsibility</gloss>
+<gloss>to assume liability</gloss>
+<gloss>to bear the burden</gloss>

Entry created

@@ -5,0 +6,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>違法ドラック</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

I think this is OK.

Or, to be more precise, they're not necessarily illegal. It's a cat-and-mouse game.

daijr: "多幸感，快感などを高める目的で服用される物質のうち，取り扱いや服用が麻薬取締法や覚醒剤取締法の対象になっていないものの総称。"
jwiki: "2000年半ばまで、合法ドラッグとだけ呼ばれた。行政側の用語が用意され脱法ドラッグが2000年半ばから、違法ドラッグが2005年から、危険ドラッグが2014年7月からである。

I think that would be confusing given that they aren't actually illegal.

Should this really include the gloss "law-evading drug" when the word literally is "illegal drug"? I think it would make more sense to 
lead with "illegal drug".

https://www.police.pref.osaka.lg.jp/seikatsu/yakubutsuranyo/6896.html
etc. etc.

@@ -5,0 +6,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>危険ドラック</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

OK, let's do it.

@@ -15 +15,2 @@
-<gloss>quasi- legal drug</gloss>
+<gloss>quasi-legal drug</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="lit">dangerous drug</gloss>

Is the claim on that page (that all 危険ドラッグ are illegal) even correct? Surely you can always create a new "危険ドラッグ" that evades the current laws.

Also I think a [lit] like Jim suggested 
might be good.

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<gloss>quasi-legal drug</gloss>
+<gloss>quasi- legal drug</gloss>

First result for 危険ドラッグ
https://www.fukushihoken.metro.tokyo.lg.jp/no_drugs/about/
"大変危険で違法なドラッグです！

「合法と言われているものは安全」「法規制されていないものだと言われた」―実は、すべて「違法」です。

「合法ドラッグ」「脱法ハーブ」などと称して販売されるため、あたかも身体影響がなく、安全であるかのように誤解されていますが、大麻や麻薬、覚醒剤などと同
じ成分が含まれており、大変危険で違法なドラッグです。"

I think "law-evading drug" should go, maybe quasi-legal drug too.

@@ -13 +12,0 @@
-<gloss>law-evading drug</gloss>

Well, it's really an expression. Dunno if you'd use が with it.

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos>

I don't think a "noun" should be tagged as a "quote".

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<misc>&quote;</misc>
+<misc>&id;</misc>

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<misc>&quote;</misc>

id?  proverb?  quote?

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss>content with a frugal life</gloss>
+<gloss>being content with a frugal life</gloss>

daijr: https://kotobank.jp/word/一簞の食一瓢の飲-205061
daijs, nikk: https://kotobank.jp/word/一箪の食一瓢の飲-434370
https://ctext.org/pre-qin-and-han?searchu=一箪食#n1231

Well, it is one.

I don't think [quote] makes sense here.

@@ -13 +12,0 @@
-<misc>&quote;</misc>

後漢書

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<misc>&quote;</misc>

daijr, daijs, nikk: https://kotobank.jp/word/党同伐異-581061

責めを負う	6551
責を負う	11344
の責めを負う	1974
の責を負う	4042
が責めを負う	642
が責を負う	1614

I think you're right. Moreover, it looks as though people are usually writing 責めを負う without the め. MeCab/Unidic treats 責を負う as though it were 責めを負う.
I'll delete this and add 責を負う to the 責めを負う entry.

https://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q1119485826
「責(せめ)を負う」と言います。
「責(せき)を負う」とは言いません。

http://rivast.cocolog-nifty.com/blog/2007/06/post_482d.html
2.責：せめ　×せき
　意味は「責任」ですが、「責」の一字の場合は「せめ」と読みます。
　例）「……損害賠償の責を負うものとする。」

https://twitter.com/StarfuryMk1/status/485491955002929152
クルーテオ伯爵のセリフで、恐らく「責を負う」の部分が「せきをおう」になってましたよ。この場合は「せめ」が正解で「せき」とは読みません。

http://www.tahara-kantei.com/column/column265.html
同じく法律用語の「責を負う」を、法律家が、「せきをおう」と読んでいたら笑われるであろう。
　(「せめをおう」と読むのである。)

Sorry I was unclear--I meant to say that I think 責を負う is the same as 責めを負う in both reading and meaning.

責めを負う	6551
責を負う	11344

Well, "to take the blame" means much the same.
I'll make them the same

@@ -12,0 +13,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2402120">責めを負う</xref>
+<gloss>to take the blame</gloss>

I think this entry was mis-transcribed. 
It's a duplicate of 2402120.

Daijs

Fairly obvious.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<pos>&v5u;</pos>
@@ -12,0 +14,2 @@
+<gloss>to assume liability</gloss>
+<gloss>to bear the burden</gloss>

If it's not necessarily old, but not used now or recently, use "obs". "obsc" is more for current but rare terms.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<misc>&obsc;</misc>
+<misc>&obs;</misc>
@@ -17 +17 @@
-<misc>&obsc;</misc>
+<misc>&obs;</misc>

daijr, daijs, nikk: https://kotobank.jp/word/饌-549233
the kokogos record only the せん reading but aozora indicates that it's also read ぜん:
https://furigana.info/w/饌

By the way, I still find it difficult to distinguish arch, obs, and obsc after half a year's contributing:

1. Not sure if 饌 is primarily used during or before the Edo period. To determine that, you need the unabridged edition of Nikkoku
   or subscription to the historical corpora at NINJAL to see the whole history. But since 饌 is a kango, it is likely to be used
   throughout the history of 文語 instead of being an 江戸語, so it is probably not arch.
2. It is used by Meiji and early-Showa period authors like Mori Ogai (as shown by aozora), but no longer in general use (ghits are few). So it is obs.
3. It is "rarely used" in post-WWII 口語, but not "rarely used" throughout history (as shown by aozora) -- the criterion for "obsc" is ambiguous.
   However, there are more common terms (供え物, 神饌, 献饌, 食饌, etc.), so it appears to be obsc.

Can't find any modern usage.

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<misc>&arch;</misc>

There are two distinct entries: the not very common 隔心/かくしん and the even less common 隔て心/へだてごころ. They seem to mean much the same, although there may be a nuance about the latter which escapes me. They only overlap via an okurigana-free variant of 隔て心. I really don't think that's anything like enough to merge them.
In JMdict we merge entries more aggressively than any other dictionary AFAICT, but I don't think we should go too far.

@@ -16,2 +16,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1801430">隔意</xref>
-<gloss>reservations</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2843360">隔心・かくしん</xref>
+<gloss>reserve</gloss>

daijr, daijs: https://kotobank.jp/word/隔て心-624910
nikk: https://kotobank.jp/word/隔て心-624910
隔て心	138
隔心	926
隔意	2176
seven hits of 隔て心 and one hit of へだてごころ over 隔心 in aozora

can this be merged with 隔心（かくしん・きゃくしん）?
i think it's better to allow multiple 語形 in an entry (not bound by the 2-out-of-3 rule) to group synonyms together and show their relative frequency
or we can use a central database of synonyms so that we need n rather than n*(n-1)/2 xrefs

Appears to be no longer used.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<misc>&obsc;</misc>
+<misc>&arch;</misc>

daijr, daijs, nikk: https://kotobank.jp/word/沢-512648
quotations: https://furigana.info/w/沢:たく

Very marginal. If it wasn't for the Daijirin appearance I'd drop it.

http://www.iwami.gr.jp/reiki_int/reiki_honbun/m007RG00000195.html
"私語、雑語又は拍手等をすること"

The 雑語 in that link is unrelated to the 雑語 in daijr. I'm not sure how I'd translate ("various words", maybe?) it but 雑 has its regular meaning of "various" or "miscellaneous". It was probably coined by the author of the column.
There are a few other instances of 雑語 on the web, none of which mean "foul language" as far as I can tell. In the link above it appears to refer to "chatting" (i.e. 雑談).
That's why I wonder if this entry is actually helpful. These other meanings not supported by any dictionary are probably too obscure to add as senses, but the daijr meaning we have here is even more obscure.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<misc>&obsc;</misc>
+<misc>&obs;</misc>

FWIW, I saw it here first https://www.nikkeyshimbun.jp/rensai/2006-esp/2006rensai-izumi

This is so obscure that the only example I can find is the one given in daijr (from 1908). Not sure we even need it as an entry.

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<misc>&obsc;</misc>

I don't see the need for the 
clarification

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>cough etiquette (to prevent the transmission of diseases)</gloss>
+<gloss>cough etiquette</gloss>

Not sure it's needed.

see previous

clarification

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>cough etiquette</gloss>
+<gloss>cough etiquette (to prevent the transmission of diseases)</gloss>

咳エチケット	393

daijs: https://kotobank.jp/word/咳エチケット-547051

english translation:
https://www.sahealth.sa.gov.au/wps/wcm/connect/440ce9004ff8e4298458bf4826472d56/wwc-QA-cough-etiquette-phcs-ics-20071210.pdf?MOD=AJPERES
Cough etiquette is a series of actions to take if you are coughing or sneezing, which are designed to reduce the spread of respiratory illness to others.
https://ifrcgo.org/ecv-toolkit/action/coughing-etiquette/
xplain that coughing etiquette matters because it helps to prevent the transmission of diseases that are spread through droplets carried in the air.

https://kotobank.jp/word/コンピュータ言語学-67540
計算言語学	957
コンピュータ言語学	279
コンピューター言語学	75

The 悟り is a bit sarcastic, but yes, I think that actually works.

@@ -16 +15,0 @@
-<gloss>millennial generation lacking ambition and material desire</gloss>
@@ -17,0 +17 @@
+<gloss g_type="expl">millennial generation lacking ambition and material desire</gloss>

Doesn't it make less sense as a second gloss? It makes more "dictionarial" sense to 
me to lead with something slightly opaque (but more literal) and then follow it up 
with an explanation, than the other way around.

OK, but not as first gloss, and an xref to give a bit of context for the term.

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1270850">悟る・さとる・3</xref>
@@ -15,0 +17 @@
+<gloss>enlightened generation</gloss>

They are "enlightened" (さとってる) in the Buddhist sense - that's why they "lack ambition and 
material desire".

0 n-grams

I don't think that first gloss helped at all. Ordered on Googits.

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>悟り世代</keb>
+<keb>さとり世代</keb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<keb>さとり世代</keb>
+<keb>悟り世代</keb>
@@ -15 +14,0 @@
-<gloss>the enlightened generation</gloss>

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<gloss>hedge</gloss>

daijr, daijs, nikk: https://kotobank.jp/word/堵-579161

mostly used in expressions

No, I'd rather not merge on the basis of a less-used form. OTOH いしゆみ is a recognized kun reading of 弩.

daijr, daijs, nikk: https://kotobank.jp/word/弩-102902
aozora: https://furigana.info/w/弩:ど

only one kanji and one meaning overlap, probably not worth merging

daijr, daijs: https://kotobank.jp/word/笯-579199
nikk

GG5: 駑馬に笞(むち)打つ goad a hack; whip a jade on
・駑馬に笞打って働きます． I will work until I drop.

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<gloss g_type="lit">to whip a jaded horse</gloss>

daijr, daijs, nikk: https://kotobank.jp/word/駑馬に鞭打つ-584444

"死語かどうかは、「わかりま千円」" - very cute.
And 10 years ago it was being described as possibly 死語?

yes, it must be.

the other example on that page (死語かどうかは、「わかりま千円」) reminds me of when my coworker used to say おつかれさマンコ at the end of the day.

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<reb>ありがとう</reb>
+<reb>ありがじゅっぴき</reb>

unless maybe ありがじゅっぴき is the point of the joke?  (forcing the reader/listener to figure out what you mean?)
https://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q1131220311

十匹 is じゅっぴき, not とうひき.  i agree that 蟻が十匹 is likely to be pronounced ありがとう, with とう being a gikun reading of 十匹.

i also agree that we may not need this entry, although we do have a number of other 'internet wordplay' entries similar to this

As absurd as it sounds, I think the 匹 probably is pronounced. On Twitter, there are plenty of hits for "蟻が10" (without the 匹).
But I question whether we even need this as an entry. Wordplay of this sort is extremely common on the Japanese internet and very little of it is worth recording in a dictionary.

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1586820">有り難う・ありがとう</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1586820">ありがとう</xref>

古語辞典, koj, daijr/s, nikk

The parenthetical note might be unnecessary.

I think you're right.

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<misc>&obsc;</misc>

Do we need obsc for proper nouns? To me, obsc here implies that the language is more commonly known by a different name.

0 n-grams

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<misc>&obsc;</misc>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/チアチア語

Add POS to proverbs
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<pos>&v5r;</pos>

daijr: https://kotobank.jp/word/騏驎も老いぬれば駑馬に劣る-247243
daijs: https://kotobank.jp/word/驎騏も老いぬれば駑馬に劣る-480475 (title is wrong)
nikk: https://kotobank.jp/word/麒麟も老いぬれば駑馬に劣る-2030286


麒麟も老い	347
麒麟も老いぬれば	37
麒麟も老いては	299

英和コンピューター用語辞典

reading: https://www.fujisan.co.jp/zasshi_kensaku/1119459/?q=かみばん

I prefer this.

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<gloss>stupid people who are easily influenced by mass media</gloss>
+<gloss>low-IQ people who are easily influenced by mass media</gloss>

Since it's derog, there's no need to beat around the bush

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<gloss>less intelligent individuals who are easily influenced by mass media</gloss>
+<gloss>stupid people who are easily influenced by mass media</gloss>

https://d.hatena.ne.jp/keyword/B層  also

I think a suitable note would end up being too long.

GG5, LSD, 医学英和辞典

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/クッバ
クッバ	187
クッベ	183
キッベ	82
キッバ	No matches

@@ -3,0 +4,6 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>クッバ</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>クッベ</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -12,0 +19 @@
+<lsource xml:lang="ara"/>

I've flagged it as an issue. If we are to cover キビ/kibbeh it would need to be in its own entry, as we don't mix dialect and regular terms in the one entry.

It's コロニア語, based on the Portuguese pronunciation. Another instance in which a dialect tag would be helpful.

キッベ	82
キビ	321206
キッバ	< 20  <- in the EJs for "kibbeh"

キビ is millet. I think the Nikkey Shimbun has either got the word wrong, or Brazilian Japanese is way out of step.

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>キビ</reb>
+<reb>キッバ</reb>

タッブーレ	206
タブレ	4491
タブーラ	150
タッブーラ	< 20
Various EJs

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>タブレ</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -8 +11,4 @@
-<reb>タブレ</reb>
+<reb>タブーラ</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>タッブーラ</reb>

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tabbouleh
https://macaro-ni.jp/19288
https://www.nikkeyshimbun.jp/2015/bom-apetite-05.html

not a Japanese concept
simplifying

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>neijia</gloss>
+<gloss>neijia (Chinese martial arts style)</gloss>
@@ -15 +14,0 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">Chinese martial arts style based on spiritual, mental or qi-related aspects</gloss>

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neijia

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<gloss g_type="expl">Chinese martial arts style based on spiritual, mental or qi-related aspects</gloss>

世界大百科事典 https://kotobank.jp/word/内家拳-1381489
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/内家拳

GG5, ルミナス

Love the reading.

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>ぶとうざん</reb>
+<reb>どういん</reb>
@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1154320">あん摩・あんま・1</xref>

daijr etc https://kotobank.jp/word/導引-103110
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tao_yin

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andes

@@ -12,2 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>Andes, the</gloss>
-<gloss>Cordillera de los Andes</gloss>
+<gloss>The Andes</gloss>
+<gloss>Andes Mountains</gloss>

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pico_da_Neblina
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/ネブリナ山

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/武当山