[vt]: meikyo, sankoku, smk, etc.

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

daijr

More detail and a second sense.

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss>control</gloss>
+<gloss>control (by the state)</gloss>
@@ -19,0 +20,6 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1685620">航空交通管制</xref>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<gloss>air traffic control</gloss>

GG5

A bit broader.

@@ -17,0 +18,2 @@
+<gloss>controlling</gloss>
+<gloss>coordination</gloss>

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2600030">航空管制塔</xref>

GG5

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<field>&aviat;</field>

Presumably it always refers to ATCs.

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2620720">航空管制官</xref>
@@ -17 +18 @@
-<gloss>controller (esp. air traffic)</gloss>
+<gloss>(air traffic) controller</gloss>

GG5

@@ -16 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>controller (usually air-traffic)</gloss>
+<field>&aviat;</field>
+<gloss>controller (esp. air traffic)</gloss>

May as well close this.

Reopen.

GG5, etc.

The JEs either lead with 十把一絡げに or only have it. I think maybe a note will do, so I've popped one in. I'll approve and reopen in case we want to talk it over. I don't really think we need both, but I wouldn't object to a 十把一絡げに entry.

@@ -24,0 +25 @@
+<s_inf>usu. 〜に</s_inf>

gg5
十把一絡げ	17557	  
十把一絡げに	10460	  
十把一絡げにする	2006	  
十把一絡げの	1165

Might be worth having a separate 十把一絡げに entry.

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<keb>十把一絡</keb>
+<keb>十把ひとからげ</keb>
@@ -14 +14 @@
-<keb>十把ひとからげ</keb>
+<keb>十把一絡</keb>
@@ -25 +25,3 @@
-<gloss>lumping together all sorts of things</gloss>
+<gloss>lumping together (things or people)</gloss>
+<gloss>treating (everyone) alike</gloss>
+<gloss>handling indiscriminately</gloss>
@@ -27 +29 @@
-<gloss>dealing with various things under one head</gloss>
+<gloss>dealing with (various things) under one head</gloss>

OK

can we move it to the bottom? I think one "correct translation" in the lead is enough, the much more 
common "plum" ones should follow

@@ -21 +20,0 @@
-<gloss>ume orchard</gloss>
@@ -23,0 +23 @@
+<gloss>ume orchard</gloss>

I'd keep it in there.

@@ -20,0 +21 @@
+<gloss>ume orchard</gloss>

Since this is the first gloss in the 梅 
entry... i feel "ume orchard" can confuse 
people who aren't familiar with the word "ume" 
(which I assume is most of everyone)

@@ -20 +20 @@
-<gloss>ume orchard</gloss>
+<gloss>Japanese apricot orchard</gloss>

I'm comfortable with this version.

Simplifying (no need to be very detailed in this sort of entry.)

@@ -17,2 +17,3 @@
-<gloss>okuri-ashi</gloss>
-<gloss>moving one foot forwards or backwards and following with the other without surpassing it (kendo footwork)</gloss>
+<field>&MA;</field>
+<gloss>okuriashi</gloss>
+<gloss>forward or backward foot movement (kendo)</gloss>
@@ -22 +23,2 @@
-<gloss>moving in accordance with the opponent´s footwork (judo)</gloss>
+<field>&MA;</field>
+<gloss>moving in accordance with opponent's footwork (judo)</gloss>

definition for [2] and [3]
https://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/word/送り足/ 

images for [2]
https://www.kendo-guide.com/footwork.html

The japanese definition for [2] is a bit lacking, its best to see images of the footwork.

@@ -13,0 +14,9 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>okuri-ashi</gloss>
+<gloss>moving one foot forwards or backwards and following with the other without surpassing it (kendo footwork)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>moving in accordance with the opponent´s footwork (judo)</gloss>

@@ -13,1 +13,1 @@
-<gloss>stepping out of the ring while carrying the opponent over the edge, not considered as loss</gloss>
+<gloss>stepping out of the ring while carrying the opponent over the edge, not considered as a loss</gloss>

@@ -12,1 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>step out of the ring while carrying the opponent over the edge, not considered as loss (sumo)</gloss>
+<field>&sumo;</field>
+<gloss>stepping out of the ring while carrying the opponent over the edge, not considered as loss</gloss>

Entry created

Yeah, I feel it's adequately covered by "used to laugh something off", probably.

I think sense 2 handles it well enough. You'd have to have an essay on all the things that could lead someone to saying it That Chiebukuro paragraph is good, but let's not try and turn it into a gloss.

https://kotobank.jp/word/ぬるぽ-188435

There's an "exhausted" sense that this entry hasn't captured yet. Not sure if it's the same as sense 2.

OK. I'm afraid "bloop" doesn't work for me either. If it means anything, it's a mistake, like "blooper". I feel it's best left as an explanation, but I can live with "nurupo".

If we could come up with more than one English gloss, I feel "bloop" would be fine. But alone, I agree it's a little weird, it would seem 
like we're saying it's a better translation than it really is.
How's just "nurupo"? We can come back and remove the gloss once Jmdict 2.0 is functional

@@ -22,0 +23,2 @@
+<stagr>ぬるぽ</stagr>
+<stagr>ヌルポ</stagr>
@@ -27 +29 @@
-<gloss>bloop</gloss>
+<gloss>nurupo</gloss>

Adding search-only forms.

@@ -8,0 +9,8 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>三蜜</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>３蜜</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

HiddenForm 三蜜；３蜜

OK. As I suggested, I've proposed an entry for 三蜜.

They do look similar, but no literate native speaker would have any trouble identifying which is which. I mean, 蜜 has 虫 in it. If 蜜 and 密 had similar or related meanings, I could believe that people were using 蜜 intentionally, but that's not the case. I still don't think it's needed.

might still be worth pointing out it's wasei?

@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+<lsource ls_wasei="y"/>

https://www.gov-online.go.jp/tokusyu/mynumber/point/ "For Inquiries regarding the My Number Card, Electronic Certificate, and Notification Card ...."

Seems official now.

@@ -10 +10 @@
-<lsource ls_wasei="y">my number card</lsource>
+<gloss>My Number Card</gloss>

Quiet for a week.

This may be a little clearer.

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<gloss>identity number card</gloss>

Daijs: 「ほじし」とも

https://kotobank.jp/word/脯-629900

@@ -14,0 +15,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ほじし</reb>

Quiet for a week.

Koj, Daijs, etc.

Split from 1979510. Seems to be a contraction of ほししし. Could be merged but this seems old, and the reading restrictions would be messy.

as previous

群衆 【ぐんしゅう(P); ぐんしゅ; ぐんじゅ】 (n) (See 群集) group (of people); crowd; horde; throng; mob; multitude; (P); ED
雪崩 【なだれ】 (n) avalanche; snowslide; (P); ED
Not in references. Nothing in Reverso.

I don't think this is needed. If it got 900 hits rather than 90 it might be classed as a real term, but I think it's just an on-the-fly construction.

群衆雪崩	90

provided weblio link was just a wiki redir to the article 将棋倒し that mentions 群衆雪崩 once:
"なお、人の密度が中密度で起きやすく転倒が線状に起こるものを「将棋倒し」、超過密状態で起き転倒が塊状に拡大するものを「群衆雪崩」と区別する考え方もある。"

https://www3.nhk.or.jp/news/special/saigai/select-news/20191202_02.html
それでもあなたは帰りますか？ 帰宅困難者「群衆雪崩」の危険
...
専門家は帰宅困難を「ただ家に帰るのが難しい問題」ではなく、人が折り重なって倒れる「群衆雪崩」の危険があると警鐘を鳴らしている。
...
ドラマでは密集した群衆が折り重なって倒れる「群衆雪崩」と呼ばれる現象が発生して多くの死者が出るというシーンを描いた。

I think this refers specifically to people falling over during a stampede rather than the stampede itself.
we define 将棋倒し as "	falling down one after another (like dominoes)" (chujiten: "fall down one after another")

https://www.weblio.jp/content/群衆雪崩

Seems to be a rather official title.

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<gloss>My Number card</gloss>
+<gloss>My Number Card</gloss>

https://www.fnn.jp/articles/-/120549
https://www.nikkei.com/article/DGXZQODE115EP0R11C20A2000000
etc

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<gloss>striking the opponent immediately after defending an incoming attack</gloss>
+<gloss>striking one's opponent immediately after defending an incoming attack</gloss>

http://www.ventus-1.seesaa.net/article/107913943.html

After adding 対の先 which is easily confused with 後の先, I think its convenient to add this extra explanation.
Plus removed the (kendo) since it's also used in other martial arts.

@@ -14 +14,2 @@
-<gloss>counterattack (kendo)</gloss>
+<gloss>counterattack</gloss>
+<gloss>striking the opponent immediately after defending an incoming attack</gloss>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/後の先
後の先	6089

@@ -11,0 +12,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2645160">返し技・かえしわざ</xref>
+<field>&MA;</field>

https://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q1391754503

Very simplified, but explaining more might be too wordy

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<gloss>striking just before the opponent makes a move</gloss>
+<gloss>striking just before one's opponent makes a move</gloss>

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos>

https://karatebuko.exblog.jp/19401576/
先の先	30875

Not just kendo.

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>striking just before the opponent makes a move (kendo)</gloss>
+<field>&MA;</field>
+<gloss>striking just before the opponent makes a move</gloss>

JP https://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q1391754503
EN https://www.kendo-guide.com/terminology_sen.html

先々の先	429
先先の先	116

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>先先の先</keb>

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>predicting and striking just before the opponent makes a move (kendo)</gloss>
+<gloss>predicting and striking just before one's opponent makes a move (kendo)</gloss>

Not common.

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos>

gakken katakana (no lsrc)

yeah, i think the kokugos automatically tag a lot of genus names as being latin

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacaranda#Etymology

Yes, the kokugos are unanimous that it's "ラテン", and they're all wrong, just as some of them are wrong saying アナナス is Latin.
It's from Tupi-Guarani via Portuguese. I think it got into Japanese via English (Gakken agrees), but if we really need an lsrc, probably "por" is best (as we have with アナナス.)
(Merriam Webster calls it "New Latin", by which it means the Latinized creations used in "scientific description and classification". IMNSHO that doesn't make it Latin at all.)
In this part of the world blue jacaranda (Jacaranda mimosifolia) is flowering all over the place.

@@ -9 +8,0 @@
-<lsource xml:lang="lat"/>

daij, koj

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<lsource xml:lang="lat"/>

GG5

Ordinary a in English.

@@ -9 +9 @@
-<gloss>jacarandá</gloss>
+<gloss>jacaranda</gloss>

https://lovegreen.net/library/garden-tree/p88932/
https://lovegreen.net/flower/p13105/

GG5, etc.

Capital

医学英和辞典 (has バイアル瓶). GG5 has バイアル: 【化】 〔水薬瓶〕 a vial; a vial container; a multiple-dose container.

Of course it should be an entry. A bit of a tautology, but Japanese is like that.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2070180">バイアル</xref>

one example:
https://www.nichiden-rika.com/blog/?p=446
(website of Nichidenrika-Glass Co. Ltd.)
page title: "バイアル瓶とは？"
(and every instance of バイアル in the text (15 of them) is as part of バイアル瓶)

バイアル瓶	1750

バイアルが	187
バイアル瓶が	46


I was talking to a Japanese person working in chemistry and when I asked a question about バイアル they responded bla bla bla 
バイアル瓶. It's A+B, but possibly useful to have?

ビン首効果	31

maybe びん首効果 should come first.

@@ -4,0 +5,3 @@
+<keb>びん首効果</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -7,3 +10,3 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>びん首効果</keb>
-</k_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>びんくびこうか</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -12,4 +15 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>びんくびこうか</reb>
-<re_restr>びん首効果</re_restr>
+<re_restr>瓶首効果</re_restr>

瓶首効果	35
びん首効果	63
瓶首	112
びん首	71
https://jglobal.jst.go.jp/detail?JGLOBAL_ID=201306036969752518 - "...またはびん首効果(びんくびこうか)とは、..."

A bit messy.

@@ -6,0 +7,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>びん首効果</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -8,0 +12,4 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>びんくびこうか</reb>
+<re_restr>びん首効果</re_restr>

daijs

瓶首効果	35

a little obscure but it's worth having for the へいしゅ reading for 瓶首  I think

アプフェルシュトゥルーデル	< 20
アプフェルシュトュルーデル	< 20
アプフェルシュトルーデル	86
シュトゥルーデル	1426
シュトュルーデル	< 20
シュトルーデル	976

Prefer an English gloss.

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>アプフェルシュトルーデル</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -13 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>apfelstrudel</gloss>
+<lsource xml:lang="ger">Apfelstrudel</lsource>
+<gloss>apple strudel</gloss>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/アプフェルシュトゥルーデル
https://www.nikkeyshimbun.jp/2020/200208-81colonia.html

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/シュトゥルーデル
シュトゥルーデル	1426
シュトルーデル	976  <- in ＫＯＤ追加語彙

I'll can this one for now, but I think we need to work out the best way to handle the 〜すぎる compound nouns. They're using the last (and only "uk") sense of the 過ぎる entry, which isn't a lot of help for learners.

yeah, -sugiru is so productive that i think that we should have a "rule" that the entries aren't included unless they appear in a major kokugo or gg5, etc.

If anything, I think that's a case for deleting some of our existing -すぎる entries.
We don't have 高すぎる, 長すぎる, 暑すぎる, etc., which are all much more common than 苦すぎる.

大き過ぎる	42816
大きすぎる	322688
多過ぎる	77015
多すぎる	939116
遅過ぎる	10290
遅すぎる	255573
早過ぎる	53770
早すぎる	353188

We already have a heap of adj+過ぎる 複合動詞. Apart from being not as common I can't see why this one is less acceptable

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1195970">過ぎる・すぎる・4</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1195970">過ぎる・すぎる・6</xref>

Jisho also shows the 苦い entry without issue when searching for 苦すぎる.

GG5

Simpler

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>air traffic control zone</gloss>
+<field>&aviat;</field>

https://kotobank.jp/word/管制圏-1295637
https://ejje.weblio.jp/content/管制圏
https://www.mlit.go.jp/koku/koku_tk10_000004.html

Hmm. I guess so.

We normally don't include the Japanese at all unless it's reasonably common. "bubuzuke" isn't reasonably common in English (or honestly, 
even in kyb).

I thought it was appropriate to have "bubuzuke" in the gloss somewhere.

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss>bubuzuke</gloss>
+<gloss>ochazuke</gloss>

Still quiet.

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2847854">相懸かり・2</xref>

相懸かり稽古	71

I've just proposed an entry for 相懸かり which may make this unnecessary. If this is approved 
there could be an xref to it.

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<gloss>training performed by 2 partners engaging each other</gloss>
+<gloss>mutual attack training</gloss>

https://au1120.boo-log.com/e426676.html

ref is for kendo, but this can also be used in other martial arts

自然妊娠	33628

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos>

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>striking one's opponent while defending their attack</gloss>
+<gloss>striking one's opponent while defending from their attack</gloss>

対の先	371

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>striking one's opponent while defending their incoming attack</gloss>
+<gloss>striking one's opponent while defending their attack</gloss>

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>striking the opponent while defending an incoming attack</gloss>
+<gloss>striking one's opponent while defending their incoming attack</gloss>

懸の先	59

I think this will do.

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<gloss>seize the initiative by attacking first</gloss>
+<gloss>seizing the initiative by attacking first</gloss>

http://www.ventus-1.seesaa.net/article/107913943.html

Some articles treat it as 先の先, hence the cross ref
http://www5b.biglobe.ne.jp/~karate/html/sub_html.htm/study-karate/study_3tunosen.htm

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<gloss>seize the initiative by counterattacking</gloss>
+<gloss>seizing the initiative by counterattacking</gloss>

https://www.koten.net/gorin/yaku/303/

Some articles treat it as 後の先, hence the cross ref
http://www5b.biglobe.ne.jp/~karate/html/sub_html.htm/study-karate/study_3tunosen.htm

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>体体の先</keb>

体々の先	37

Rather marginal. I don't have a problem with "counterattack" being used in several entries.

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<misc>&obsc;</misc>

http://www.ventus-1.seesaa.net/article/107913943.html

I feel like this can be confused with 待の先, since answering the opponent's attack with another attack is some form of counterattack as well. Maybe there's a better way to word this definition or 待の先's.

reverso examples
完全互換	        13313	  
完全互換で	1956	  
完全互換の	1033	  
完全互換性	890

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

https://www.weblio.jp/content/完全互換 https://kotobank.jp/word/完全互換-2535

I agree.

食肉卸売市場	805
http://www.gunmasyokuniku.co.jp/ (example)

Rather A+B+C. Not sure it's worth an entry.

@@ -1,3 +1,2 @@
-<ent_corp type="jmnedict">jmnedict</ent_corp>
-<ent_seq>5403134</ent_seq>
+<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
@@ -11,2 +10,2 @@
-<misc>&place;</misc>
-<gloss>Shokunikuoroshiuriichiba</gloss>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>wholesale meat market</gloss>

Probably not a thing

地方卸売市場	71506
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/地方卸売市場

Given that this is just one of many different types of regional wholesale market, I think we can drop it.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>regional wholesale meat market]</gloss>
+<gloss>regional wholesale meat market</gloss>

食肉地方卸売市場	511

I don't think it's needed, but it won't hurt.

@@ -1,3 +1,2 @@
-<ent_corp type="jmnedict">jmnedict</ent_corp>
-<ent_seq>5403135</ent_seq>
+<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
@@ -11,2 +10,2 @@
-<misc>&place;</misc>
-<gloss>Shokunikuchihouoroshiuriichiba</gloss>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>regional wholesale meat market]</gloss>

Probably not a thing

Yes, "scuff mark" is better.

https://home.howstuffworks.com/how-to-remove-heel-mark-spots.htm

Ah, I assumed it referred to dents/scratches left in the floor by high heels. So this probably is worth having. 
The above article does call them "heel marks" but I think that's odd. "Scuff mark" is indeed the usual term in English.

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>heel mark</gloss>
+<lsource xml:lang="eng">heel mark</lsource>
+<gloss>scuff mark (left by a shoe)</gloss>

In the show (which I wasn't watching very carefully), it seemed to be referring to any black mark made by a shoe. like these:
http://stat.ameba.jp/user_images/20151014/09/no507/c9/0e/j/o0800060013453508416.jpg
(from this page, mentioning ヒールマーク https://ameblo.jp/no507/entry-12083643545.html)
also here:
http://fujiko-museum.com/blog/?p=7289/
Page title: ヒールマークって？
"館内を見回っていたら、
スタッフの松浦さんが、
長い棒を持っているのを発見！
「何してるの？」と声をかけたら・・・
「これで汚れを取っているんですよ～」
よく見てみると、
棒の先にテニスボールを半分に
カットしたものがついていました。
これでヒールマーク（靴のカカトでついてしまう黒い汚れ）を
消しているそうです。
お掃除業界では一般的に使われているらしいのですが、
テニスボールで汚れが落ちるんですね。"
(this is the same thing they were doing on the NHK show by the way, using a tennis ball on a stick to remove the mark)

Is "heel mark" wasei? 
"scuff mark (left by a shoe)"?

Is there something special about marks specifically made by heels? This looks very A+B to me.

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>large-scale campaign</gloss>
@@ -14 +14,0 @@
-<gloss>large-scale campaign</gloss>

A little trim.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>major operation</gloss>
+<gloss>major mission</gloss>
@@ -15 +14,0 @@
-<gloss>great mission</gloss>

Some suggestions.

@@ -12 +12,4 @@
-<gloss>...</gloss>
+<gloss>large-scale operation</gloss>
+<gloss>major operation</gloss>
+<gloss>large-scale campaign</gloss>
+<gloss>great mission</gloss>

大作戦	1594734

Can anybody come up with any good glosses for 
this one?

家畜試験場	595
畜産試験場	15284

Just noting that the links below are actually for 畜産試験場, another term that was in the names dictionary and has now been moved to the main dictionary.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2848498">畜産試験場</xref>

https://www.hro.or.jp/list/agricultural/research/sintoku/
https://www-lib.shinshu-u.ac.jp/opc/index.php?q=recordID/catalog.bib/AN00175282
https://www.pref.gunma.jp/07/p18210018.html

There are quite a few of them throughout Japan. Probably worth having.

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>livestock experiment station</gloss>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/畜産試験場
家畜試験場	595

Not sure it's needed.

@@ -1,3 +1,2 @@
-<ent_corp type="jmnedict">jmnedict</ent_corp>
-<ent_seq>5167511</ent_seq>
+<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
@@ -11,2 +10,2 @@
-<misc>&place;</misc>
-<gloss>Kachikushikenjou</gloss>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>domestic animal research centre</gloss>

Unlikely to be a proper name

Fork.

could be worth keeping as a general term, but rather A+B

Probably not a thing

Adding spec1
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<reb>ジャパン・ハウス</reb>
+<reb>ジャパンハウス</reb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>ジャパンハウス</reb>
+<reb>ジャパン・ハウス</reb>

https://www.japanhouse.jp/

Adding spec1
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

Yes, it probably can.

@@ -1,3 +1,2 @@
-<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
-<ent_seq>2847743</ent_seq>
+<ent_corp type="jmnedict">jmnedict</ent_corp>
@@ -11 +10 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&ev;</misc>

Should this be moved to the names dictionary (as [event])?

ＫＯＤ追加語彙

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Koza riot</gloss>
+<gloss>Koza riot (Okinawa, 1970)</gloss>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/コザ暴動