JMdictDB - Entries

jmdict 1002720 Active (id: 2278462)
お冷；お冷や；御冷 [sK] ；御冷や [sK]
【おひや】

1.	[n] ▶ cold (drinking) water ▶ (glass of) cold water
2.	[n] ▶ cold boiled rice

History:

5.	A 2023-09-30 13:36:50 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...>
	Diff:	@@ -11,0 +12 @@ +<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf> @@ -14,0 +16 @@ +<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
4.	A 2020-11-21 19:51:25 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
3.	A* 2020-11-21 12:18:05 Robin Scott <...address hidden...>
	Refs:	gg5、ウィズダムお冷や 13797 お冷 24585 御冷や 33 御冷 179
	Diff:	@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@ +<k_ele> +<keb>お冷</keb> +</k_ele> @@ -8 +11 @@ -<keb>お冷</keb> +<keb>御冷</keb> @@ -12,3 +14,0 @@ -</k_ele> -<k_ele> -<keb>御冷</keb> @@ -21,0 +22 @@ +<gloss>(glass of) cold water</gloss>
2.	A 2020-11-20 11:15:50 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
1.	A* 2020-11-20 09:07:09 Opencooper
	Refs:	daijs
	Diff:	@@ -9,0 +10,6 @@ +<k_ele> +<keb>御冷や</keb> +</k_ele> +<k_ele> +<keb>御冷</keb> +</k_ele> @@ -15,0 +22,3 @@ +</sense> +<sense> +<pos>&n;</pos>

View entry in alternate formats: jel | edict | jmdict xml | jmnedict xml | jmdictdb xml

jmdict 1020980 Deleted (id: 2088415)

イアリング

1.

[n]
▶ ear-ring

History:

2.	D 2020-11-20 11:19:25 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
	Comments:	Merged.
1.	A* 2020-11-20 06:56:00 Opencooper
	Comments:	Please merge to 「イヤリング」.

View entry in alternate formats: jel | edict | jmdict xml | jmnedict xml | jmdictdb xml

jmdict 1021910 Active (id: 2088414)

イヤリング [gai1,ichi1] ；イアリング

1.

[n]
▶ earring

History:

1.	A 2020-11-20 11:19:05 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
	Refs:	イアリング 18992 イヤリング 552416
	Comments:	Merging.
	Diff:	@@ -8,0 +9,3 @@ +<r_ele> +<reb>イアリング</reb> +</r_ele>

View entry in alternate formats: jel | edict | jmdict xml | jmnedict xml | jmdictdb xml

jmdict 1052710 Active (id: 2295075)

コンデンサ [gai1] ；コンデンサー

1.

[n] {electricity, elec. eng.}
▶ capacitor
▶ condenser

Cross references:
	⇐ see: 1698020 蓄電器【ちくでんき】 1. capacitor; condenser
	⇐ see: 2292540 キャパシタ 1. capacitor

History:

5.	A 2024-03-19 03:20:29 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
4.	A* 2024-03-18 17:52:23 Brian Krznarich <...address hidden...>
	Refs:	https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capacitor In electrical engineering, a capacitor is a device that stores electrical energy...
	Comments:	Searching for "capacitor" to see how to handle "resistor" and saw this wasn't marked either. The distinction for [elect] vs [elec] seems a bit ill-defined. I have started a github conversation on [elec]/[electr]. Seems somewhat bigger than any one entry.
	Diff:	@@ -12,0 +13 @@ +<field>&elec;</field>
3.	A 2023-01-06 17:48:44 Robin Scott <...address hidden...>
	Diff:	@@ -5,0 +6 @@ +<re_pri>gai1</re_pri> @@ -9 +9,0 @@ -<re_pri>gai1</re_pri>
2.	A 2020-11-20 11:17:04 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
1.	A* 2020-11-20 08:22:27 Opencooper
	Refs:	コンデンサー 215270 コンデンサ 345481
	Comments:	The J-Es lead with "capacitor" and Luminous notes that "condenser" is an old term.
	Diff:	@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@ +<r_ele> +<reb>コンデンサ</reb> +</r_ele> @@ -8,3 +10,0 @@ -<r_ele> -<reb>コンデンサ</reb> -</r_ele> @@ -13 +12,0 @@ -<gloss>condenser (electrical component)</gloss> @@ -14,0 +14 @@ +<gloss>condenser</gloss>

View entry in alternate formats: jel | edict | jmdict xml | jmnedict xml | jmdictdb xml

jmdict 1245010 Active (id: 2205010)
具足
【ぐそく】

1.	[n,vs,vt,vi] ▶ completeness ▶ being fully equipped
2.	[n] ▶ (suit of) armor ▶ armour

Conjugations

History:

7.	A 2022-08-20 01:56:35 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
6.	A* 2022-08-19 10:01:15 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...>
	Refs:	mk
	Comments:	interestingly this also means "furniture" but that's prob arch
	Diff:	@@ -12,0 +13,2 @@ +<pos>&vt;</pos> +<pos>&vi;</pos>
5.	A 2020-11-20 03:28:32 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
4.	A* 2020-11-20 00:14:12 Robin Scott <...address hidden...>
	Refs:	gg5, daijr
	Comments:	I don't think adj-f is necessary.
	Diff:	@@ -18,2 +18 @@ -<pos>&adj-f;</pos> -<gloss>armor</gloss> +<gloss>(suit of) armor</gloss> @@ -21 +19,0 @@ -<gloss>coat of mail</gloss>
3.	A 2011-09-02 03:01:08 Rene Malenfant <...address hidden...>
(show/hide 2 older log entries)
2.	A* 2011-09-01 22:26:05 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
	Refs:	GG5, etc.
	Comments:	Why drop "completeness"? It's the gloss in all the JEs. Daijirin has "物事が十分にそなわっていること。過不足なくそろっていること。"
	Diff:	@@ -13,1 +13,6 @@ -<gloss>fully equipped</gloss> +<gloss>completeness</gloss> +<gloss>being fully equipped</gloss> +</sense> +<sense> +<pos>&n;</pos> +<pos>&adj-f;</pos>
1.	A* 2011-09-01 19:47:47
	Diff:	@@ -13,1 +13,1 @@ -<gloss>completeness</gloss> +<gloss>fully equipped</gloss>

View entry in alternate formats: jel | edict | jmdict xml | jmnedict xml | jmdictdb xml

jmdict 1271300 Active (id: 2088693)
誤る [ichi1,news2,nf41] ；謬る
【あやまる [ichi1,news2,nf41] 】

1.	[v5r,vt] ▶ to make a mistake (in) ▶ to commit an error ▶ to do incorrectly ▶ to err
2.	[v5r,vi] 《as 誤った or 誤っている》 ▶ to be wrong ▶ to be incorrect ▶ to be false ▶ to be mistaken
3.	[v5r,vt] ▶ to mislead ▶ to misguide ▶ to lead astray

Conjugations

History:

4.	A 2020-11-25 00:30:46 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
	Comments:	I have reindexed some of the sentences (of 23 I have made 5 sense 2 and 1 sense 3.)
3.	A* 2020-11-21 21:26:32 Robin Scott <...address hidden...>
	Refs:	gg5, prog, meikyo
	Comments:	Meikyo and nikk split their entries into transitive and intransitive senses.
	Diff:	@@ -22 +22,3 @@ -<gloss>to make a mistake</gloss> +<gloss>to make a mistake (in)</gloss> +<gloss>to commit an error</gloss> +<gloss>to do incorrectly</gloss> @@ -23,0 +26,9 @@ +</sense> +<sense> +<pos>&v5r;</pos> +<pos>&vi;</pos> +<s_inf>as 誤った or 誤っている</s_inf> +<gloss>to be wrong</gloss> +<gloss>to be incorrect</gloss> +<gloss>to be false</gloss> +<gloss>to be mistaken</gloss> @@ -29,0 +41 @@ +<gloss>to lead astray</gloss>
2.	A 2020-11-20 11:26:12 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
1.	A* 2020-11-20 10:39:57
	Refs:	https://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/word/en/誤る/#je-1800
	Diff:	@@ -21 +21 @@ -<pos>&vi;</pos> +<pos>&vt;</pos> @@ -27 +27 @@ -<pos>&vi;</pos> +<pos>&vt;</pos>

View entry in alternate formats: jel | edict | jmdict xml | jmnedict xml | jmdictdb xml

jmdict 1272320 Active (id: 2088497)
交通機関 [news1,nf17]
【こうつうきかん [news1,nf17] 】

1.

[n]
▶ (means of) transportation
▶ transport
▶ transportation facilities
▶ transportation system
▶ transit system

History:

4.	A 2020-11-21 19:55:54 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
3.	A* 2020-11-21 13:41:17 Robin Scott <...address hidden...>
	Refs:	daijr, gg5, reverso examples
	Comments:	Doesn't refer specifically to public transport, which is 公共交通機関.
	Diff:	@@ -15,0 +16,2 @@ +<gloss>(means of) transportation</gloss> +<gloss>transport</gloss> @@ -17,2 +19,2 @@ -<gloss>public transportation</gloss> -<gloss>means of transport</gloss> +<gloss>transportation system</gloss> +<gloss>transit system</gloss>
2.	A 2020-11-20 19:54:52 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
	Refs:	GG5, etc.
	Diff:	@@ -16,2 +16,3 @@ -<gloss>transportation facilities “/</gloss> -<gloss>” public transportation</gloss> +<gloss>transportation facilities</gloss> +<gloss>public transportation</gloss> +<gloss>means of transport</gloss>
1.	A* 2020-11-20 12:47:03 Derek W <...address hidden...>
	Refs:	The 2000 Most Common Words in Japanese
	Comments:	This may be the difference in the British expression as opposed to the American English expression.
	Diff:	@@ -16 +16,2 @@ -<gloss>transportation facilities</gloss> +<gloss>transportation facilities “/</gloss> +<gloss>” public transportation</gloss>

View entry in alternate formats: jel | edict | jmdict xml | jmnedict xml | jmdictdb xml

jmdict 1303450 Active (id: 2088418)
ちらし寿司；散らし寿司；ちらし鮨；散らしずし；散らし鮨
【ちらしずし】

1.

[n] {food, cooking}
▶ chirashi
▶ chirashizushi
▶ [expl] sushi rice in a box or bowl with a variety of ingredients sprinkled on top

Cross references:
	⇒ see: 2258460 ばら寿司【ばらずし】 1. type of sushi with a variety of ingredients sprinkled on the rice
	⇒ see: 1268660 五目鮨【ごもくずし】 1. sushi rice mixed with various ingredients (vegetables, fish, etc.)
	⇐ see: 1303440 散らし【ちらし】 3. sushi rice in a box or bowl with a variety of ingredients sprinkled on top

History:

9.	A 2020-11-20 11:21:22 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
8.	A* 2020-11-20 08:32:57 Opencooper
	Refs:	G n-grams: ちらし寿司 212112 散らし寿司 27089 ちらし鮨 1819 散らしずし 304 散らし鮨 76 ちらしずし 28005
	Diff:	@@ -5 +5 @@ -<keb>散らし鮨</keb> +<keb>ちらし寿司</keb> @@ -11 +11 @@ -<keb>ちらし寿司</keb> +<keb>ちらし鮨</keb> @@ -14,0 +15,3 @@ +</k_ele> +<k_ele> +<keb>散らし鮨</keb>
7.	A 2019-06-06 23:02:43 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
6.	A* 2019-06-06 19:17:58 Alan Cheng <...address hidden...>
	Refs:	google, personal experience
	Comments:	This is often just called chirashi in English.
	Diff:	@@ -23,0 +24 @@ +<gloss>chirashi</gloss>
5.	A 2019-06-06 07:13:56 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...>
(show/hide 4 older log entries)
4.	A* 2019-06-03 01:52:06 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
	Refs:	https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sushi#Chirashizushi
	Comments:	I often see it romanized.
	Diff:	@@ -24 +24,2 @@ -<gloss>sushi rice in a box or bowl with a variety of ingredients sprinkled on top</gloss> +<gloss>chirashizushi</gloss> +<gloss g_type="expl">sushi rice in a box or bowl with a variety of ingredients sprinkled on top</gloss>
3.	A 2010-09-07 14:13:08 Rene Malenfant <...address hidden...>
2.	A* 2010-09-07 09:03:05 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
	Refs:	新和英中辞典, Hosking: "A Dictionary of Japanese Food"
	Comments:	"unrolled sushi" doesn't really work there, as strictly speaking it doesn't have to be rolled or moulded.
	Diff:	@@ -13,0 +13,3 @@ +<k_ele> +<keb>散らしずし</keb> +</k_ele> @@ -18,0 +21,2 @@ +<xref type="see" seq="2258460">ばら寿司・ばらずし</xref> +<xref type="see" seq="1268660">五目鮨・ごもくずし</xref> @@ -19,1 +24,1 @@ -<gloss>unrolled sushi with a variety of ingredients sprinkled on rice and placed inside a box or bowl</gloss> +<gloss>sushi rice in a box or bowl with a variety of ingredients sprinkled on top</gloss>
1.	A* 2010-09-05 19:15:09 Scott
	Refs:	WP waeichujiten
	Diff:	@@ -10,0 +10,3 @@ +<k_ele> +<keb>ちらし寿司</keb> +</k_ele> @@ -16,1 +19,1 @@ -<gloss>type of sushi with a variety of ingredients sprinkled on the rice</gloss> +<gloss>unrolled sushi with a variety of ingredients sprinkled on rice and placed inside a box or bowl</gloss>

View entry in alternate formats: jel | edict | jmdict xml | jmnedict xml | jmdictdb xml

jmdict 1321410 Active (id: 2088459)
実費 [ichi1,news1,nf21]
【じっぴ [ichi1,news1,nf21] 】

1.	[n] ▶ actual expenses ▶ out-of-pocket expenses
2.	[n] ▶ cost price

History:

2.	A 2020-11-21 00:13:03 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
1.	A* 2020-11-20 23:35:38 Robin Scott <...address hidden...>
	Refs:	gg5, chujiten, prog
	Comments:	Splitting into senses.
	Diff:	@@ -18 +18,5 @@ -<gloss>actual expense</gloss> +<gloss>actual expenses</gloss> +<gloss>out-of-pocket expenses</gloss> +</sense> +<sense> +<pos>&n;</pos>

View entry in alternate formats: jel | edict | jmdict xml | jmnedict xml | jmdictdb xml

jmdict 1394180 Active (id: 2156531)
前略 [ichi1]
【ぜんりゃく [ichi1] 】

1.	[exp] 《at the beginning of a brief letter》 ▶ dispensing with the preliminaries ...
2.	[n,vs,vi] 《when quoting something》 ▶ omitting the previous part

Conjugations

History:

12.	A 2021-11-07 00:57:07 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...>
	Refs:	meikyo
	Diff:	@@ -19,0 +20 @@ +<pos>&vi;</pos>
11.	A 2020-11-20 06:04:12 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
	Comments:	Noted, but I don't think it added materially to this entry, whereas the notes in the 拝啓 and 敬具 entries did.
10.	A* 2020-11-09 21:18:46 Jim Rose <...address hidden...>
	Comments:	I was trying to bring this pair (戦略、早々) in line with the other correspondence pair (拝啓、敬具) which are currently and I think beneficially linked. So if it’s not an improvement for the brief letter, why is it an improvement that adds value for the formal letter? As in the case of 拝啓 & 敬具, 前略 & 早々 are always paired in an appropriately but quickly written letter.
9.	A* 2020-11-09 11:00:15 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
	Comments:	I prefered it as it was before, which I think was more appropriate as a dictionary entry.
	Diff:	@@ -14,3 +14 @@ -<xref type="see" seq="1596410">草々・2</xref> -<xref type="see" seq="1596410">草々・2</xref> -<s_inf>letters beginning with this typically end with 草々</s_inf> +<s_inf>at the beginning of a brief letter</s_inf>
8.	A* 2020-11-09 08:36:38 Jim Rose <...address hidden...>
	Refs:	Learn Japanese New College Text Volume II ©1984 John Young and Kimiko Nakajima-Okano, Chapter 14, Note 14.4.1, page 286.
	Comments:	Bringing the correspondence pairs in line with each other.
	Diff:	@@ -14 +14,2 @@ -<s_inf>at the beginning of a brief letter</s_inf> +<xref type="see" seq="1596410">草々・2</xref> +<s_inf>letters beginning with this typically end with 草々</s_inf>
(show/hide 7 older log entries)
7.	A 2020-10-29 02:23:37 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
6.	A* 2020-10-29 01:38:25 Robin Scott <...address hidden...>
	Refs:	gg5, daijr
	Diff:	@@ -14,2 +14,2 @@ -<s_inf>opening formula of a brief letter</s_inf> -<gloss>skipping the pleasantries...</gloss> +<s_inf>at the beginning of a brief letter</s_inf> +<gloss>dispensing with the preliminaries ...</gloss> @@ -20 +20,2 @@ -<gloss>omitting the beginning</gloss> +<s_inf>when quoting something</s_inf> +<gloss>omitting the previous part</gloss>
5.	A* 2020-10-28 14:39:09
	Diff:	@@ -15 +15 @@ -<gloss>forgive me for dispensing with the preliminaries, but I hasten to inform you that...</gloss> +<gloss>skipping the pleasantries...</gloss>
4.	A 2020-10-28 03:57:36 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...>
	Diff:	@@ -15 +15 @@ -<gloss>Forgive me for dispensing with the preliminaries, but I hasten to inform you that...</gloss> +<gloss>forgive me for dispensing with the preliminaries, but I hasten to inform you that...</gloss>
3.	A 2018-08-08 19:50:58 Robin Scott <...address hidden...>
	Diff:	@@ -13 +13 @@ -<pos>&n;</pos> +<pos>&exp;</pos>
2.	A 2011-09-15 00:52:24 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
1.	A* 2011-09-14 07:14:29 Rene Malenfant <...address hidden...>
	Refs:	koj, daij, gg5, prog
	Comments:	combination of glosses from gg5 and prog. nc helpfully offers ~no~ translation and says only that 英文手紙ではすぐ用件に入るのが普通なので, 「前略」にあたる正確な英語はない
	Diff:	@@ -14,2 +14,7 @@ -<gloss>first part omitted</gloss> -<gloss>salutation of brief letter</gloss> +<s_inf>opening formula of a brief letter</s_inf> +<gloss>Forgive me for dispensing with the preliminaries, but I hasten to inform you that...</gloss> +</sense> +<sense> +<pos>&n;</pos> +<pos>&vs;</pos> +<gloss>omitting the beginning</gloss>

View entry in alternate formats: jel | edict | jmdict xml | jmnedict xml | jmdictdb xml

jmdict 1429280 Active (id: 2088437)
調度 [news2,nf33]
【ちょうど [news2,nf33] 】

1.	[n] ▶ household items ▶ furniture ▶ furnishings ▶ fixtures ▶ supplies
2.	[n] [arch] ▶ bow and arrow

History:

2.	A 2020-11-20 19:51:11 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
1.	A* 2020-11-20 11:46:58 Robin Scott <...address hidden...>
	Refs:	gg5, prog, daij, shinmeikai
	Comments:	vs sense is archaic.
	Diff:	@@ -16 +16,4 @@ -<pos>&vs;</pos> +<gloss>household items</gloss> +<gloss>furniture</gloss> +<gloss>furnishings</gloss> +<gloss>fixtures</gloss> @@ -18,2 +21,5 @@ -<gloss>furniture</gloss> -<gloss>fixtures</gloss> +</sense> +<sense> +<pos>&n;</pos> +<misc>&arch;</misc> +<gloss>bow and arrow</gloss>

View entry in alternate formats: jel | edict | jmdict xml | jmnedict xml | jmdictdb xml

jmdict 1541810 Active (id: 2088500)
由来 [ichi1,news1,nf15]
【ゆらい [ichi1,news1,nf15] 】

1.	[n,vs] ▶ origin ▶ source ▶ history ▶ derivation
2.	[adv] ▶ originally ▶ from the start ▶ by nature

Conjugations

History:

5.	A 2020-11-21 20:00:08 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
4.	A* 2020-11-21 17:58:50 Robin Scott <...address hidden...>
	Refs:	gg5, daij
	Comments:	Creating a separate adverb sense.
	Diff:	@@ -19 +18,0 @@ -<pos>&adv;</pos> @@ -24,2 +23,6 @@ -<gloss>reason</gloss> -<gloss>destiny</gloss> +</sense> +<sense> +<pos>&adv;</pos> +<gloss>originally</gloss> +<gloss>from the start</gloss> +<gloss>by nature</gloss>
3.	A 2020-11-20 04:13:44 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
2.	A* 2020-11-19 22:13:37
1.	A 2017-09-15 17:10:45 Johan Råde <...address hidden...>
	Refs:	gg5 daijs
	Comments:	the refs list [adv] last
	Diff:	@@ -17 +16,0 @@ -<pos>&adv;</pos> @@ -19,0 +19 @@ +<pos>&adv;</pos>

View entry in alternate formats: jel | edict | jmdict xml | jmnedict xml | jmdictdb xml

jmdict 1606640 Active (id: 2088451)
我輩；吾輩 [news2,nf39] ；我が輩；吾が輩；わが輩
【わがはい [news2,nf39] 】

1.	[pn] [male,dated] 《nuance of arrogance》 ▶ I ▶ me ▶ myself
2.	[pn] [male,arch] ▶ we ▶ us ▶ ourselves

History:

4.	A 2020-11-20 23:32:33 Robin Scott <...address hidden...>
	Diff:	@@ -28,0 +29 @@ +<misc>&dated;</misc>
3.	A 2018-08-27 00:50:22 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
2.	A* 2018-08-25 16:44:28 Robin Scott <...address hidden...>
	Refs:	daij, meikyo
	Comments:	It's sense 2 that's archaic. Sense 1 is merely old-fashioned.
	Diff:	@@ -28 +27,0 @@ -<misc>&arch;</misc> @@ -30 +29,2 @@ -<gloss>I (nuance of arrogance)</gloss> +<s_inf>nuance of arrogance</s_inf> +<gloss>I</gloss> @@ -35,0 +36,2 @@ +<misc>&male;</misc> +<misc>&arch;</misc>
1.	A 2018-05-16 04:37:51 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
	Comments:	Bulk update: deletion of adj-noBulk update: deletion of adj-no -- via bulkupd.py --
	Diff:	@@ -28 +27,0 @@ -<pos>&adj-no;</pos> @@ -37 +35,0 @@ -<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

View entry in alternate formats: jel | edict | jmdict xml | jmnedict xml | jmdictdb xml

jmdict 1693800 Active (id: 2278417)
お下がり；お下り [sK] ；御下がり [sK] ；御下り [sK]
【おさがり】

1.

[n]
▶ hand-me-down

Cross references:
	⇐ see: 1609810 下がり【さがり】 3. food offering to the gods; leftovers; hand-me-downs

2.

[n]
▶ food offering to the gods

Cross references:
	⇐ see: 1609810 下がり【さがり】 3. food offering to the gods; leftovers; hand-me-downs

3.

[n]
▶ leftovers

4.

[n]
▶ trip from Kyoto to the provinces

History:

5.	A 2023-09-30 13:04:16 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...>
	Refs:	お下がり 152498 97.2% お下り 2734 1.7% 御下がり 1019 0.6% 御下り 622 0.4%
	Diff:	@@ -7,0 +8,4 @@ +<keb>お下り</keb> +<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf> +</k_ele> +<k_ele> @@ -8,0 +13 @@ +<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf> @@ -11,0 +17 @@ +<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf> @@ -18 +23,0 @@ -<pos>&adj-no;</pos> @@ -23 +27,0 @@ -<pos>&adj-no;</pos> @@ -28 +31,0 @@ -<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
4.	A 2021-01-27 08:00:11 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
3.	A* 2021-01-27 03:54:53 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...>
	Refs:	daijs - not obv arch based on that definition.
	Diff:	@@ -19 +19 @@ -<gloss>hand-me-downs</gloss> +<gloss>hand-me-down</gloss> @@ -29,0 +30,4 @@ +</sense> +<sense> +<pos>&n;</pos> +<gloss>trip from Kyoto to the provinces</gloss>
2.	A 2020-11-20 11:22:20 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
1.	A* 2020-11-20 09:01:07 Opencooper
	Refs:	daijs 御下がり 1019 お下がり 152498 御下り 622 おさがり 50408
	Comments:	The J-Es mainly have the hand-me-downs sense.
	Diff:	@@ -5 +5 @@ -<keb>御下がり</keb> +<keb>お下がり</keb> @@ -8 +8 @@ -<keb>お下がり</keb> +<keb>御下がり</keb> @@ -18,0 +19,5 @@ +<gloss>hand-me-downs</gloss> +</sense> +<sense> +<pos>&n;</pos> +<pos>&adj-no;</pos> @@ -25 +29,0 @@ -<gloss>hand-me-downs</gloss>

View entry in alternate formats: jel | edict | jmdict xml | jmnedict xml | jmdictdb xml

jmdict 1694050 Active (id: 2278797)
お目玉；御目玉 [sK]
【おめだま】

1.

[n]
▶ scolding
▶ telling-off
▶ talking-to
▶ dressing-down

History:

5.	A 2023-10-01 21:23:53 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...>
	Diff:	@@ -8,0 +9 @@ +<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
4.	A 2020-11-21 20:01:29 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
3.	A* 2020-11-21 17:53:02 Robin Scott <...address hidden...>
	Refs:	gg5, prog
	Diff:	@@ -15 +15,4 @@ -<gloss>a scolding</gloss> +<gloss>scolding</gloss> +<gloss>telling-off</gloss> +<gloss>talking-to</gloss> +<gloss>dressing-down</gloss>
2.	A 2020-11-20 11:16:22 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
1.	A* 2020-11-20 09:01:20 Opencooper
	Refs:	御目玉 42 お目玉 4761 おめだま 408
	Diff:	@@ -5 +5 @@ -<keb>御目玉</keb> +<keb>お目玉</keb> @@ -8 +8 @@ -<keb>お目玉</keb> +<keb>御目玉</keb>

View entry in alternate formats: jel | edict | jmdict xml | jmnedict xml | jmdictdb xml

jmdict 1751830 Active (id: 2088395)
避難民 [news1,nf07]
【ひなんみん [news1,nf07] 】

1.

[n]
▶ evacuees
▶ displaced persons
▶ refugees

Cross references:
	⇐ see: 2843242 国内避難民【こくないひなんみん】 1. internally displaced person

History:

3.	A 2020-11-20 05:58:51 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
	Comments:	I don't, but the change looks OK.
2.	A* 2020-11-20 05:56:45
	Comments:	people think of a different concept when they heard the word "refugee"
	Diff:	@@ -16 +15,0 @@ -<gloss>refugees</gloss> @@ -18,0 +18 @@ +<gloss>refugees</gloss>
1.	A 2020-02-13 00:49:17 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
	Comments:	Align with 国内避難民.
	Diff:	@@ -17,0 +18 @@ +<gloss>displaced persons</gloss>

View entry in alternate formats: jel | edict | jmdict xml | jmnedict xml | jmdictdb xml

jmdict 1815930 Active (id: 2088435)
宇宙飛行
【うちゅうひこう】

1.

[n]
▶ space flight
▶ spaceflight

History:

1.	A 2020-11-20 13:38:57 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...>
	Diff:	@@ -12 +11,0 @@ -<pos>&adj-no;</pos> @@ -13,0 +13 @@ +<gloss>spaceflight</gloss>

View entry in alternate formats: jel | edict | jmdict xml | jmnedict xml | jmdictdb xml

jmdict 1845890 Active (id: 2088460)
錚々；錚錚
【そうそう】

1.	[adj-t,adv-to] [uk] ▶ eminent ▶ prominent ▶ distinguished ▶ first-rate ▶ leading
2.	[adj-t,adv-to] [form] ▶ ringing (of metal) ▶ resonant (of a musical instrument)

History:

4.	A 2020-11-21 00:13:26 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
3.	A* 2020-11-20 23:48:26 Robin Scott <...address hidden...>
	Refs:	gg5, daij, meikyo
	Comments:	I shouldn't have removed adv-to in 2017.
	Diff:	@@ -14,0 +15 @@ +<pos>&adv-to;</pos> @@ -18,0 +20,2 @@ +<gloss>first-rate</gloss> +<gloss>leading</gloss> @@ -22 +25,2 @@ -<misc>&uk;</misc> +<pos>&adv-to;</pos> +<misc>&litf;</misc>
2.	A 2017-04-18 23:14:11 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
	Refs:	中辞典 uses kana in examples.
1.	A* 2017-04-18 13:36:37 Robin Scott <...address hidden...>
	Refs:	daijr/s, koj
	Comments:	Added sense. Not an adverb. Not sure if [uk] is right.
	Diff:	@@ -15 +14,0 @@ -<pos>&adv-to;</pos> @@ -17,0 +17 @@ +<gloss>prominent</gloss> @@ -19,0 +20,6 @@ +<sense> +<pos>&adj-t;</pos> +<misc>&uk;</misc> +<gloss>ringing (of metal)</gloss> +<gloss>resonant (of a musical instrument)</gloss> +</sense>

View entry in alternate formats: jel | edict | jmdict xml | jmnedict xml | jmdictdb xml

jmdict 1894010 Deleted (id: 2088442)
調度が調う
【ちょうどがととのう】

1.

[exp,v5u]
▶ to get fully furnished

Conjugations

History:

3.	D 2020-11-20 20:26:00 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
2.	D* 2020-11-20 11:41:17 Robin Scott <...address hidden...>
	Refs:	調度が調う No matches 調度が整う No matches 調度がととのう No matches
1.	A 2010-11-08 03:44:32 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
	Comments:	Added additional PoS via batch update.Added additional PoS via batch update. -- via bulkupd.py --
	Diff:	@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@ +<pos>&v5u;</pos>

View entry in alternate formats: jel | edict | jmdict xml | jmnedict xml | jmdictdb xml

jmdict 2075880 Active (id: 2278693)
お流れ；御流れ [sK]
【おながれ】

1.

[n]
▶ cancellation
▶ abandonment

Cross references:
	⇐ see: 1552130 流れ【ながれ】 7. cancellation

History:

4.	A 2023-10-01 02:28:18 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...>
	Diff:	@@ -8,0 +9 @@ +<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
3.	A 2020-11-20 11:16:08 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
2.	A* 2020-11-20 08:51:16 Opencooper
	Refs:	daijr お流れ 38458 御流れ 141 おながれ 392
	Comments:	There's also a second sense for receiving a sake cup from a superior.
	Diff:	@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@ +</k_ele> +<k_ele> +<keb>御流れ</keb>
1.	A 2006-02-07 00:00:00
	Comments:	Entry created

View entry in alternate formats: jel | edict | jmdict xml | jmnedict xml | jmdictdb xml

jmdict 2079370 Active (id: 2088377)
に連れて
【につれて】

1.

[exp,conj] [uk]
《as XにつれてY》
▶ as (X, then Y)
▶ with
▶ in accordance with
▶ in proportion to

Cross references:
	⇐ see: 2136050 に連れ【につれ】 1. as (X, then Y); with; in accordance with; in proportion to

History:

3.	A 2020-11-20 04:07:33 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
2.	A* 2020-11-20 00:03:13 Robin Scott <...address hidden...>
	Refs:	gg5, daijr/s
	Comments:	I don't think we need examples in the gloss.
	Diff:	@@ -10,0 +11 @@ +<pos>&exp;</pos> @@ -13 +14,5 @@ -<gloss>as X, then Y (e.g. as we age we gain wisdom, as wine matures it becomes more valuable, etc.)</gloss> +<s_inf>as XにつれてY</s_inf> +<gloss>as (X, then Y)</gloss> +<gloss>with</gloss> +<gloss>in accordance with</gloss> +<gloss>in proportion to</gloss>
1.	A 2006-03-07 00:00:00
	Comments:	Entry created

View entry in alternate formats: jel | edict | jmdict xml | jmnedict xml | jmdictdb xml

jmdict 2088380 Active (id: 2088416)
潮汁；うしお汁
【うしおじる】

1.

[n]
▶ thin soup of fish or shellfish boiled in seawater

Cross references:
	⇐ see: 1428620 潮【しお】 4. thin soup of fish or shellfish boiled in seawater

History:

3.	A 2020-11-20 11:19:59 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
2.	A* 2020-11-20 08:39:05 Opencooper
	Refs:	G n-grams: 潮汁 24754 うしお汁 2414 うしおじる 297
	Diff:	@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@ +</k_ele> +<k_ele> +<keb>うしお汁</keb>
1.	A 2006-07-09 00:00:00
	Comments:	Entry created

View entry in alternate formats: jel | edict | jmdict xml | jmnedict xml | jmdictdb xml

jmdict 2118900 Active (id: 2088426)
モテ男
【モテお；モテおとこ】

1.

[n] [col]
▶ man who is popular with women

Cross references:
	⇒ see: 2640260 モテる 1. to be popular (esp. with the opposite sex); to be well liked; to be pampered (spoiled, doted upon, etc.); to be welcomed

History:

3.	A 2020-11-20 12:00:35 Robin Scott <...address hidden...>
	Diff:	@@ -15,0 +16 @@ +<misc>&col;</misc>
2.	A 2020-11-19 02:19:36 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
	Diff:	@@ -14,0 +15 @@ +<xref type="see" seq="2640260">モテる</xref>
1.	A 2006-12-21 00:00:00
	Comments:	Entry created

View entry in alternate formats: jel | edict | jmdict xml | jmnedict xml | jmdictdb xml

jmdict 2118910 Active (id: 2088427)
モテ女
【モテおんな】

1.

[n] [col]
▶ woman who is popular with men

Cross references:
	⇒ see: 2640260 モテる 1. to be popular (esp. with the opposite sex); to be well liked; to be pampered (spoiled, doted upon, etc.); to be welcomed

History:

4.	A 2020-11-20 12:00:52 Robin Scott <...address hidden...>
	Diff:	@@ -12,0 +13 @@ +<misc>&col;</misc>
3.	A 2020-11-19 02:17:34 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
	Comments:	It probably is. I'll do it.
2.	A* 2020-11-12 08:20:39 Opencooper
	Comments:	Good idea to have x-refs for all our モテ- entries (モテ期 / モテ男 / モテ度 / モテ髪 / モテファッション) to explain that part?
	Diff:	@@ -11,0 +12 @@ +<xref type="see" seq="2640260">モテる</xref>
1.	A 2006-12-21 00:00:00
	Comments:	Entry created

View entry in alternate formats: jel | edict | jmdict xml | jmnedict xml | jmdictdb xml

jmdict 2118920 Active (id: 2088428)
モテ髪
【モテがみ】

1.

[n] [col]
▶ fashionable hairstyle, particularly to attract members of the opposite sex

Cross references:
	⇒ see: 2640260 モテる 1. to be popular (esp. with the opposite sex); to be well liked; to be pampered (spoiled, doted upon, etc.); to be welcomed

History:

3.	A 2020-11-20 12:02:10 Robin Scott <...address hidden...>
	Diff:	@@ -12,0 +13 @@ +<misc>&col;</misc>
2.	A 2020-11-19 02:19:56 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
	Diff:	@@ -11,0 +12 @@ +<xref type="see" seq="2640260">モテる</xref>
1.	A 2006-12-21 00:00:00
	Comments:	Entry created

View entry in alternate formats: jel | edict | jmdict xml | jmnedict xml | jmdictdb xml

jmdict 2206950 Active (id: 2088375)
真隣；真隣り；真となり
【まとなり】

1.

[adj-no,n]
▶ immediately adjacent

History:

3.	A 2020-11-20 03:27:30 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
2.	A* 2020-11-19 23:53:44 Robin Scott <...address hidden...>
	Refs:	真隣 4608 真となり 1446 真隣り 593 真隣に 1607 真となりに 54 真隣りに 223
	Diff:	@@ -6,0 +7,6 @@ +<k_ele> +<keb>真隣り</keb> +</k_ele> +<k_ele> +<keb>真となり</keb> +</k_ele> @@ -10,0 +17 @@ +<pos>&adj-no;</pos> @@ -12 +18,0 @@ -<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
1.	A 2007-08-15 00:00:00
	Comments:	Entry created

View entry in alternate formats: jel | edict | jmdict xml | jmnedict xml | jmdictdb xml

jmdict 2264760 Active (id: 2088447)
都合が悪い；都合がわるい
【つごうがわるい】

1.

[exp,adj-i]
▶ inconvenient

Cross references:
	⇔ ant: 2264750 都合がいい 1. convenient
	⇔ see: 2264770 都合の悪い 1. inconvenient

Conjugations

History:

5.	A 2020-11-20 22:34:24 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
	Refs:	都合が悪くなったので 1682 都合が悪くなって 7884 都合が悪ければ 9164 都合が悪い 101986
	Comments:	Interesting usage point, and as the usage in the Tanaka sentences show, there are other more common variants. I'm not sure we can do much to show them as entries.
4.	A* 2020-11-05 12:39:20 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...>
	Comments:	"都合が悪くなったので" can be used as a "catch-all" excuse, e.g. "we've booked a table for 8, but 都合が悪くなったので　(5 people won't be able to make it), can we change the booking to 3 people?"
3.	A 2010-07-27 00:31:07 Rene Malenfant <...address hidden...>
2.	A* 2010-07-25 19:13:22 Scott
	Diff:	@@ -15,0 +15,1 @@ +<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
1.	A 2008-04-01 00:00:00
	Comments:	Entry created

View entry in alternate formats: jel | edict | jmdict xml | jmnedict xml | jmdictdb xml

jmdict 2406500 Active (id: 2088392)

んとする；んとす

1.	[exp,vs-i] [form] 《after nai stem of verb》 ▶ to try to (do) ▶ to want to
2.	[exp,vs-i] [form] ▶ to be about to (do, happen)

Conjugations

History:

6.	A 2020-11-20 05:52:24 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
	Comments:	I've moved the question to the むず entry.
5.	A* 2020-10-26 23:26:23 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
	Comments:	Reopening to raise the question of what to do むとす. Daijisen says: "「むず」に同じ。" - can we add it to the むず entry? BTW, for むとす Koj says "「んとす」とも".
4.	A 2020-10-26 23:20:08 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
3.	A* 2020-10-26 20:48:11 Robin Scott <...address hidden...>
	Refs:	meikyo:〔文〕
	Comments:	I don't think the archaic むとす belongs here.
	Diff:	@@ -10,3 +9,0 @@ -<r_ele> -<reb>むとす</reb> -</r_ele> @@ -16,2 +13,4 @@ -<s_inf>after a -nai stem</s_inf> -<gloss>to be trying to</gloss> +<misc>&litf;</misc> +<s_inf>after nai stem of verb</s_inf> +<gloss>to try to (do)</gloss> +<gloss>to want to</gloss> @@ -22 +21,2 @@ -<gloss>to be just about to</gloss> +<misc>&litf;</misc> +<gloss>to be about to (do, happen)</gloss>
2.	A 2015-05-14 20:56:12 Rene Malenfant <...address hidden...>
	Diff:	@@ -16 +16,2 @@ -<gloss>(after a -nai stem) to be trying to</gloss> +<s_inf>after a -nai stem</s_inf> +<gloss>to be trying to</gloss>
(show/hide 1 older log entries)
1.	A 2008-09-23 00:00:00
	Comments:	Entry created

View entry in alternate formats: jel | edict | jmdict xml | jmnedict xml | jmdictdb xml

jmdict 2406510 Active (id: 2088776)

んず；むず；うず

1.

[aux-v] [arch]
《indicates conjecture》
▶ will (probably)

Cross references:
	⇐ see: 2847537 むとす 1. will (probably)

2.

[aux-v] [arch]
▶ intend (to do)
▶ will

Cross references:
	⇐ see: 2847537 むとす 2. intend (to do); will

3.

[aux-v] [arch]
▶ should
▶ ought to

History:

4.	A 2020-11-26 05:49:45 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
	Comments:	OK. I'll do that.
3.	A* 2020-11-21 20:05:24 Robin Scott <...address hidden...>
	Refs:	daij
	Comments:	Daijr's むとす entry is identical to the first two senses of むず/んず but I don't think we can merge them as むとす is an expression (連語) whereas むず/んず is a 助動詞. I suggest creating a new むとす entry which points to this one.
	Diff:	@@ -13,3 +12,0 @@ -<r_ele> -<reb>むとす</reb> -</r_ele> @@ -18 +14,0 @@ -<xref type="see" seq="2406500">んとする</xref> @@ -20 +16,2 @@ -<gloss>will probably be</gloss> +<s_inf>indicates conjecture</s_inf> +<gloss>will (probably)</gloss> @@ -24 +21,2 @@ -<gloss>intending to</gloss> +<misc>&arch;</misc> +<gloss>intend (to do)</gloss> @@ -28,0 +27 @@ +<misc>&arch;</misc> @@ -29,0 +29 @@ +<gloss>ought to</gloss>
2.	A* 2020-11-20 05:51:48 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
	Comments:	Some weeks ago we removed むとす from the んとする/んとす entry (2406500). At the time I posed the question: "what to do むとす. Daijisen says: "「むず」に同じ。" - can we add it to the むず entry?". There was no response, so I'm moving the question here. Does it belong? Is it sense 1 only? Also, is the xref to んとする correct? It's been there since Rene created the entry in 2008.
	Diff:	@@ -11,0 +12,3 @@ +</r_ele> +<r_ele> +<reb>むとす</reb>
1.	A 2008-09-23 00:00:00
	Comments:	Entry created

View entry in alternate formats: jel | edict | jmdict xml | jmnedict xml | jmdictdb xml

jmdict 2414200 Active (id: 2088394)

アタリ

1.	[n] ▶ collision ▶ overlapping (e.g. of two objects in a video game)
2.	[n] {art, aesthetics} ▶ construction lines (e.g. a rough drawing of a pose before adding details)

History:

3.	A 2020-11-20 05:57:08 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
	Comments:	This has been sitting in the too-hard basket for too long. I can't find other support for it, but I can't find grounds to reject it. May as well go in for now.
2.	A* 2020-10-31 18:25:05 Ilkka Kuusisto <...address hidden...>
	Refs:	イラストを描くうえでのアタリの役割は、キャラクターのポーズと、身体の各パーツの大体の長さを決めることです。 https://ichi-up.net/2016/132
	Diff:	@@ -11,0 +12,5 @@ +<sense> +<pos>&n;</pos> +<field>&art;</field> +<gloss>construction lines (e.g. a rough drawing of a pose before adding details)</gloss> +</sense>
1.	A 2008-11-21 00:00:00
	Comments:	Entry created

View entry in alternate formats: jel | edict | jmdict xml | jmnedict xml | jmdictdb xml

jmdict 2416070 Active (id: 2088440)
日常生活動作
【にちじょうせいかつどうさ】

1.

[n] {medicine}
▶ activities of daily living
▶ ADL
▶ normal activities of daily life

History:

3.	A 2020-11-20 20:03:07 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
	Refs:	KOD: 医
	Comments:	I guess so.
	Diff:	@@ -11,0 +12 @@ +<field>&med;</field>
2.	A* 2020-11-20 13:31:43 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...>
	Comments:	[med]? "used in healthcare"
1.	A 2008-11-21 00:00:00
	Comments:	Entry created

View entry in alternate formats: jel | edict | jmdict xml | jmnedict xml | jmdictdb xml

jmdict 2587110 Active (id: 2088461)
簇々；簇簇
【そうそう；ぞくぞく】

1.

[adv-to,adj-t] [obs]
▶ gathering
▶ swarming

History:

4.	A 2020-11-21 00:14:05 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
3.	A* 2020-11-20 23:31:57 Robin Scott <...address hidden...>
	Refs:	daijr/s 簇簇 55 簇々 44
	Comments:	Examples in daijr/s are from Meiji era.
	Diff:	@@ -5 +5 @@ -<keb>簇簇</keb> +<keb>簇々</keb> @@ -8 +8 @@ -<keb>簇々</keb> +<keb>簇簇</keb> @@ -16,0 +17 @@ +<pos>&adv-to;</pos> @@ -18 +19 @@ -<pos>&adv-to;</pos> +<misc>&obs;</misc>
2.	A 2010-10-08 11:23:43 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
	Refs:	Koj, Daij
	Diff:	@@ -17,1 +17,2 @@ -<pos>&adv;</pos> +<pos>&adj-t;</pos> +<pos>&adv-to;</pos> @@ -19,0 +20,1 @@ +<gloss>swarming</gloss>
1.	A* 2010-10-08 00:02:21 Scott
	Refs:	koj daij
	Comments:	could be improved

View entry in alternate formats: jel | edict | jmdict xml | jmnedict xml | jmdictdb xml

jmdict 2621800 Active (id: 2088881)
胴丸；筒丸
【どうまる】

1.

[n] [hist]
▶ light torso armour opening at the right, originally used for infantry combat
▶ dō-maru

History:

27.	A 2020-11-27 23:56:58 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
	Comments:	I was satisfied with Marcus's version, so I'm putting it back. I've left the commentary here rather than reject the proposed edit (which would relegate it into a separate thread), but I may not do that with future edits. Re the "don't break up URLs into multiple lines", I'm afraid that's an artifact of browsers on some mobile devices, which insert line-break characters at the ends of text boxes.
	Diff:	@@ -16 +16 @@ -<gloss>light armour opening at the right, originally used for infantry combat</gloss> +<gloss>light torso armour opening at the right, originally used for infantry combat</gloss>
26.	A* 2020-11-27 17:36:57 Alan
	Refs:	already cited refs. the previous comments.
	Comments:	>The back-and-forth here reminds me of the quote "perfection is the enemy of good". How so? All you've done, is to insist that the good is unacceptable, because you insist on the bad. For no discernable reason, and without particularly bothering to give any. Certainly not clarity or brevity, and absolutely not accuracy. If you wish to claim that I am letting the perfect, be the enemy of the good, you must first explain how/why what you propose is good, and not bad, and how/why what I propose is inferior. Explain not just how maybe an entry has to be less than perfect in one aspect, for the sake of some other aspect (for example: a bit less explanation, or maybe even accuracy, for the sake of brevity …though I should note that JMdict has a policy of brevity, beyond the level of most other dictionaries), but also how that is relevant to what I propose, in contrast to what you propose. I.e. Don't just make claims about my positions. That is no more than baseless nonsense. Make a case against them! And/or for your own position! "Put up, or shut up", as the saying goes. (this is a general problem, that you people have. You seem to like to just say "no you're wrong. X is how it should be", and insist that everyone just blindly obey. Finding actual discussion and argumentation, to be rude and impudent disruption, rather than the cornerstone of any/all collaboration/cooperation, and the foundation of how one can reach the truth or the best decisions/conclusions …as essentially all other dictionaries and all academic/scientific/scholarly endeavours do) As for the references you have chosen, this time… First of all, don't break up URLs into multiple lines. The first source, in showing a doumaru, shows a full suit of armour. The second source is a kokugo …and I have thoroughly explained why they are not only clearly inferior sources, but that they are also undeniably wrong and full of errors, in their entry on doumaru. Hence, citing them is utterly invalid. As for the third, I do not understand it's inclusion, as it is much briefer than any of the previously cited ones (aside from kokugos) and apparently just some random website mostly just concerned with costumes, and therefore not that bothered with armour. Looking at the comments, I am pleased to see you finally deciding to actually make some kind of argument, to back up your positions (though certainly not in regards to "perfection is the enemy of good"). The one on "infantry" is quite decent. I firmly disagree that it doesn't imply low-status footsoldiers, but then you did also, accurately, point out that it was mainly the low class footsoldiers who wore them initially, making that point rather moot. I still see no reason to insist on "infantry", over "combat on foot". The latter is not particularly longer, nor is it any less clear. That said, given your arguments, there is also not much reason to insist on "combat on foot", over "infantry", so… The second bit, however… >"but if the kokugos don't make a point of mentioning it, I believe it's not a very important point" How is that supposed to be an argument? First of all, that is essentially assuming that the kokugos are infallible, or must be very sensible, on the subject. This is disproven, not only in how they (as can be shown in all other dictionaries [but probably a lot more in Japanese dictionaries, than in English ones. Certainly a LOT more in jp-en/en-jp ones]) have many examples of errors and obvious examples of a lacking understanding of what they are describing, but also in that the _kokugos entries on doumaru, specifically,_ clearly contain obvious, and undeniable, errors. An argument that is clearly and obviously based on a foundation, that has already been thoroughly and undeniably shown to be invalid, cannot be regarded as a serious/honest attempt at an argument. Secondly, you are not making any kind of argument or explanation/clarification of why it wouldn't be an important point (or why it being an important or unimportant point, should matter in the least), but simply making an Argument from (flimsy) Authority, by saying that "they probably have a reason" without bothering to show, come up with, or even think about, the reason. You have four options, when it comes to the torso vs full suit issue: 1. Have the entry merely call it an "armour". (what I went with, and prefer, given how brief the entries are) 2. Have a sense with "torso armour", and a separate one with the no less (far more?) common "full suit" sense. 3. Actually bother to make a case, a serious and honest attempt (valid or not …though it must be a genuine attempt at validity) at a case, for why you can call it a torso armour, without the additional full suit sense. 4. Throw any sense of collaboration, logic, civility, or rational discussion out the window, and simply use your authority to ignore and dismiss all dissent (without listening to or addressing any arguments, however sound) and power through your position, without bothering with any kind of justification. I wouldn't recommend option #4 …though it does seem to be popular here and, by all accounts, quite accepted.
	Diff:	@@ -16 +16 @@ -<gloss>light torso armour opening at the right, originally used for infantry combat</gloss> +<gloss>light armour opening at the right, originally used for infantry combat</gloss>
25.	A 2020-11-27 00:35:36 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...>
	Refs:	https://www.hyogo-c.ed.jp/~rekihaku- bo/historystation/rekihaku-meet/seminar/bugu- kacchuu/kc_intro2.html ...中・下級の徒歩（かち）武者の甲冑として発達したものです。 there's also this: なお、今日胴丸と呼んでいる甲冑は、中世には腹巻と呼ばれており、逆に今日の腹巻を中世には胴丸と呼んでいました。(but let's just not get into it) (daijr: 中世以前はこの形式の鎧を腹巻と呼んでいた。) https://costume.iz2.or.jp/costume/535.html 胴丸は大鎧に次ぐ一般戦士の使用する軽快な武装であった。
	Comments:	The back-and-forth here reminds me of the quote "perfection is the enemy of good". "used" seems better than "made/designed". I'm not seeing how "combat on foot" is an improvement over Robin's "infantry combat" - neither implies low-status footsoldiers, but even if they did, those seem to have been the original wearers anyway (see sources, plus kokugos) so I'm not seeing the issue here. It might be the case that 胴丸 is used to refer to a full suit of armor including the sense 1 torso armor, but if the kokugos don't make a point of mentioning it, I believe it's not a very important point and that we don't have to either.
	Diff:	@@ -16,7 +16 @@ -<gloss>light torso armour opening at the right, originally used for combat on foot</gloss> -<gloss>dō-maru</gloss> -</sense> -<sense> -<pos>&n;</pos> -<misc>&hist;</misc> -<gloss>suit of armour, using such a torso armour</gloss> +<gloss>light torso armour opening at the right, originally used for infantry combat</gloss>
24.	A* 2020-11-20 09:38:25 Alan
	Comments:	"I don't think" isn't and argument or clarification. You say it isn't an improvement, but don't explain how or why it isn't. Also, "infantry" is pretty much the same as "foot soldier", including the same problems. As for "torso armour"… Yes, certainly, it is clearer, though I'd argue that if the term "armour" is used, without mention of what part your talking about, people will tend to assume that it is either torso armour, or a full suit of armour, which would be fine, here. But okay. "Torso armour" it is …but then it needs to explicitly state the second sense. (this makes this entry, inconsistent with the other armour entries, BTW)
	Diff:	@@ -16 +16,7 @@ -<gloss>light torso armour opening at the right, originally designed for infantry combat</gloss> +<gloss>light torso armour opening at the right, originally used for combat on foot</gloss> +<gloss>dō-maru</gloss> +</sense> +<sense> +<pos>&n;</pos> +<misc>&hist;</misc> +<gloss>suit of armour, using such a torso armour</gloss>
23.	A 2020-11-20 02:24:01 Robin Scott <...address hidden...>
	Comments:	I don't think those changes improve the gloss. I'm not yielding on the "torso" point. Dropping it makes the gloss less precise and harder to visualise.
	Diff:	@@ -16 +16 @@ -<gloss>light armour opening at the right, originally made for use on foot</gloss> +<gloss>light torso armour opening at the right, originally designed for infantry combat</gloss>
(show/hide 22 older log entries)
22.	A* 2020-11-19 22:56:50 Alan
	Comments:	Changed "designed" to "made". Better to avoid giving people an idea that the design was changed, when later used on horseback, or that it has features of its design that are better for foot, specifically. It's lighter and more flexible/mobile. Those are benefits, regardless. The weight and inflexible nature of the ooyoroi was a (much) greater problem on foot, than on horseback, but that is a thing about the ooyoroi, not the doumaru. The doumaru works equally well, on horse and foot.
	Diff:	@@ -16 +16 @@ -<gloss>light armour opening at the right, originally designed for use on foot</gloss> +<gloss>light armour opening at the right, originally made for use on foot</gloss>
21.	A* 2020-11-19 22:39:29 Alan
	Comments:	It is no less commonly used to refer to a full suit of armour. You cannot ignore that. To only state the "torso armour" sense, is to implicitly deny the existence of the "full suit" sense. That the kokugos fail to recognize this, is one of the ways in which their entry is clearly wrong. As I've noted, they also claim that it was only used on foot, which is clearly false. This is hardly the only example of kokugos getting things objectively and undeniably wrong. (just as there are some examples of clear and undeniable errors, in many a en-en dictionary, as well. Not to mention jp-en/en-jp dictionaries, which have a large, shocking, amount of errors that are beyond obvious and quite extremely wrong. My go-to example being that practically all en-jp dictionaries translate "hip" as "尻". IIRC there is one, just one, rather minor, en-jp dictionary that doesn't)
	Diff:	@@ -16 +16 @@ -<gloss>light torso armour opening at the right, originally designed for foot soldiers</gloss> +<gloss>light armour opening at the right, originally designed for use on foot</gloss>
20.	A 2020-11-19 17:56:36 Robin Scott <...address hidden...>
	Comments:	The fact that 胴丸 came to be used by other types of soldiers does not change the fact that it was designed for footsoldiers. We can add "originally" to be more precise. "Torso armour" is a crucial detail. 胴 is in the name. I don't think it's necessary to mention that 胴丸 can also refer to the complete suit of armour. The kokugos don't either.
	Diff:	@@ -16 +16 @@ -<gloss>light armour opening at the right</gloss> +<gloss>light torso armour opening at the right, originally designed for foot soldiers</gloss>
19.	A* 2020-11-19 08:05:36 Alan
	Comments:	I have extensively explained why having a single sense calling it a torso armour, is wrong …as well as why claiming that it is for footsoldiers, is wrong in multiple ways.
	Diff:	@@ -16 +16 @@ -<gloss>light torso armour opening at the right (designed for foot soldiers)</gloss> +<gloss>light armour opening at the right</gloss>
18.	A 2020-11-19 05:29:11 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
	Comments:	I'll merge the competing versions and close it.
	Diff:	@@ -16 +16 @@ -<gloss>armour that opens at the right</gloss> +<gloss>light torso armour opening at the right (designed for foot soldiers)</gloss>
17.	A* 2020-11-14 16:44:54 Alan
	Comments:	I.e. reverting to a version that gives a false definition. Okay, so it needs to be short… Seems my impression of how brief the definitions need to be, wasn't really all that off…
	Diff:	@@ -16 +16 @@ -<gloss>light torso armour designed for foot soldiers</gloss> +<gloss>armour that opens at the right</gloss>
16.	A 2020-11-14 11:08:06 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
	Comments:	For a term like this a short explanation is best. People can go off to other sources if they want more. I'm reverting to Robin's previous version.
	Diff:	@@ -16 +16 @@ -<gloss>light armour initially used on foot, but later also from horseback. Opens on the right side</gloss> +<gloss>light torso armour designed for foot soldiers</gloss>
15.	A* 2020-11-14 05:12:29 Alan
	Diff:	@@ -16 +16 @@ -<gloss>light armour that opens on the right side. Initially used on foot, but later also from horseback</gloss> +<gloss>light armour initially used on foot, but later also from horseback. Opens on the right side</gloss>
14.	A* 2020-11-14 05:10:24 Alan
	Comments:	Nothing that contradicts the kokugos? How about: jwiki: "しかし、その後の戦法の変化に伴い、胴丸はしだいに騎乗の上級武士にも用いられるようになり、デザイン的にも上級武士に相応しい華美なものへと発展していく。南北朝時代頃からは、胴丸の武士も兜・大袖を着用することが一般的になった。" myarmoury: "During the Mongolian invasions (1274 and 1281) and especially in the next century, the role of the infantry on the battlefield increased dramatically. Many of the poorer and low-ranking samurai preferred to fight on foot. Although the heavy, box-like o-yoroi was modernized to some degree in the 13th century, it remained quite unsuitable for infantry combat. At the same time, the do-maru's comfort, ease in wear and use on the battlefield made it a favoured replacement for the o-yoroi and other types of armour in such combat." https://www.nihonto.com/a-brief-history-of-japanese-armor/ "The dômaru and haramaki were the first light body armor for infantry. During the Muromachi era, they came to be used with helmets and shoulder guards in the place of ô-yoroi by military commanders." I still question the notion of calling it light, but as some sources do refer to it as such, I'll let it slide. (BTW, anything said of the doumaru, is also true of the haramaki. The only difference being, that the doumaru opens at the right side, and the haramaki at the back. As the ooyoroi died out, it was not quite replaced by the doumaru, but rather by the doumaru and the haramaki) …and, again, suits of armour including a doumaru "cuirass", are also typically (always?) referred to as doumaru. Hence you cannot specify it as "chest armour", unless you also add an extra sense, of a suit of armour with such a chest armour.
	Diff:	@@ -16 +16 @@ -<gloss>light torso armour designed for foot soldiers</gloss> +<gloss>light armour that opens on the right side. Initially used on foot, but later also from horseback</gloss>
13.	A 2020-11-13 23:33:15 Robin Scott <...address hidden...>
	Refs:	jwiki: "胴丸（どうまる）は、日本の鎧の形式の1つ。平安時代中期頃生じたもので、徒歩戦に適した鎧の形式である。 " http://myarmoury.com/feature_jpn_armour.html "At the beginning of this period retainers and servants usually wore simpler armour (do-maru) [...] The warriors who wore do-maru usually walked or ran near the horse of their lord."
	Comments:	That gloss is far too long. I'm not seeing anything in the sources provided that contradicts the kokugo definitions. I think we should drop the mention of samurai altogether to avoid confusion.
	Diff:	@@ -16 +16 @@ -<gloss>torso armour that opens at the right side. Initially made for those on foot, but later came to (along with the haramaki) replace the heavier and less mobile ō-yoroi on horseback as well</gloss> +<gloss>light torso armour designed for foot soldiers</gloss> @@ -18,5 +17,0 @@ -</sense> -<sense> -<pos>&n;</pos> -<misc>&hist;</misc> -<gloss>suit or armour, with such a torso armour</gloss>
12.	A* 2020-11-12 10:19:30 Alan
	Diff:	@@ -16 +16 @@ -<gloss>torso armour that opens at the right side. Initially made for those on foot, but later came to replace the heavier and less mobile ō-yoroi on horseback as well</gloss> +<gloss>torso armour that opens at the right side. Initially made for those on foot, but later came to (along with the haramaki) replace the heavier and less mobile ō-yoroi on horseback as well</gloss>
11.	A* 2020-11-12 09:58:10 Alan
	Comments:	Ah, so the policy is like that? That's more to my liking, actually. I made it so simple and brief, due to my (apparently a bit mistaken) impression of how JMdict is. Okay, a bit more explanatory, then. Not sure if it's best to says "torso armour", and then add a second sense, or if it's better to just say "armour", but… >All the kokugos describe it as light/comfortable/simple armour designed for foot soldiers. …and all the other sources I mention, make it clear that the kokugos are wrong. Certainly, this isn't an encyclopedia and it needs to be shorter. This does not excuse making it clearly wrong, however, nor does it mean that the kokugos are, or possibly could be, more reliable than the other sources I mentioned, in terms of what a doumaru is. BTW, I find it very weird, that English language sources like add a hyphen, in the name. (this is merely a comment on the practice)
	Diff:	@@ -16 +16 @@ -<gloss>light torso armour designed for foot soldiers and later worn by samurai</gloss> +<gloss>torso armour that opens at the right side. Initially made for those on foot, but later came to replace the heavier and less mobile ō-yoroi on horseback as well</gloss> @@ -17,0 +18,5 @@ +</sense> +<sense> +<pos>&n;</pos> +<misc>&hist;</misc> +<gloss>suit or armour, with such a torso armour</gloss>
10.	A 2020-11-12 00:00:14 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
	Refs:	Editorial Policy extracts: (https://www.edrdg.org/wiki/index.php/Editorial_policy) - "provide useful explanations where appropriate. "type of card game" is not very useful - in such a case explain briefly what the card game entails",
9.	A* 2020-11-11 22:26:04 Robin Scott <...address hidden...>
	Refs:	daijr/s, koj, nikk, shinmeikai
	Comments:	All the kokugos describe it as light/comfortable/simple armour designed for foot soldiers. This isn't an encyclopedia so we can't mention everything but we need to include the key details. "Dō-maru" is common in English-language sources so I've added it as a gloss. Please do not delete the exiting gloss unless you wish to improve upon it. "A type of armour" is not a helpful translation.
	Diff:	@@ -16 +16,2 @@ -<gloss>type of armour</gloss> +<gloss>light torso armour designed for foot soldiers and later worn by samurai</gloss> +<gloss>dō-maru</gloss>
8.	A* 2020-11-11 07:27:10 Alan
	Comments:	What's the basis for the description as "light"? It is lighter than the ooyoroi, certainly, but that says more about the ooyoroi. (which was, as I've explained, later replaced by the doumaru, with no one using the relatively heavy and inflexible oyoroi, anymore. Though, to be fair to the oyoroi, it was used for several centuries) As for "chest armour": As per the 丸, it wraps around the torso/胴 (with, as previously mentioned, an opening at the right side), thus covering the sides and back as well …and has bits that drape down all the way to the thighs. So it doesn't just cover the chest, but also the sides and back, as well as abdomen and upper thighs. The term "cuirass" does at least mean an armour that covers both the front and back of the chest-area (but not the things that drape down, to protect further down), and is hence decently okay as a description/translation, but "chest armour" is far too inaccurate and misleading. Also, "used primarily by foot soldiers and later by samurai" is quite wrong, on two counts. "primarily by" is wrong, unless ones adds a "at first" or "initially" before it …and, as I said, footsoldiers implies (outright means?) common soldiers, but some samurai also fought on foot. Though as the sentence later states "…and later by samurai", it's far more than an implication.
	Diff:	@@ -16 +16 @@ -<gloss>light chest armour used primarily by foot soldiers and later by samurai</gloss> +<gloss>type of armour</gloss>
7.	A 2020-11-10 23:01:47 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
	Comments:	Looks good to me.
6.	A* 2020-11-10 18:12:49 Robin Scott <...address hidden...>
	Refs:	daijr
	Comments:	I'd go with this.
	Diff:	@@ -16,6 +16 @@ -<gloss>A type of Japanese cuirass.</gloss> -</sense> -<sense> -<pos>&n;</pos> -<misc>&hist;</misc> -<gloss>suit of armour, with such a cuirass</gloss> +<gloss>light chest armour used primarily by foot soldiers and later by samurai</gloss>
5.	A* 2020-11-10 13:59:21 Alan
	Refs:	http://myarmoury.com/feature_jpn_armour.html (though it doesn't explicitly state that it was used on horseback) https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/胴丸 https://www.nihonto.com/a-brief-history-of-japanese-armor/
	Comments:	Whilst doumaru were, initially, used by retainers/ashigaru, they were later used by samurai, as well. Initially poorer samurai and/or ones that fought on foot, but was later also used by rich and/or horse-riding samurai as well, replacing the ooyoroi (which they had used before) What is sometimes called a cuirass, does also include what one might call faulds, which drape down over the lower parts, all the way down to the thighs. Hence "cuirass" is not an entirely accurate description …but it's close enough, I suppose.
	Diff:	@@ -16 +16,6 @@ -<gloss>simple cuirass worn by footsoldiers</gloss> +<gloss>A type of Japanese cuirass.</gloss> +</sense> +<sense> +<pos>&n;</pos> +<misc>&hist;</misc> +<gloss>suit of armour, with such a cuirass</gloss>
4.	A* 2020-11-10 11:54:17
	Refs:	Daijisen
	Diff:	@@ -15 +15,2 @@ -<gloss>A type of Japanese armour.</gloss> +<misc>&hist;</misc> +<gloss>simple cuirass worn by footsoldiers</gloss>
3.	A* 2020-11-10 10:14:45 Alan
	Comments:	"Medieval" refers to a European time period. It is sometimes used for a somewhat analogous period in Japanese history, but… such use either needs clarification, or clear context. (one might argue that the latter is true, here, but… I wouldn't fully agree) Also, "lacking a solid breastplate and sleeves" is not a distinguishing feature of the doumaru, as that is true of almost all Japanese armours. Either this needs a far more thorough description, that refers to it's actual distinguishing features (that it wraps around the person, with an opening at the right side, being the most notable) …or just note that it's a Japanese armour, and let people look it up in an encyclopedia and/or a more armour/militaria dedicated resource.
	Diff:	@@ -15 +15 @@ -<gloss>medieval armour lacking a solid breastplate and sleeves</gloss> +<gloss>A type of Japanese armour.</gloss>
2.	A 2011-03-31 07:15:35 Rene Malenfant <...address hidden...>
	Refs:	wiki
	Diff:	@@ -15,1 +15,1 @@ -<gloss>medieval armor</gloss> +<gloss>medieval armour lacking a solid breastplate and sleeves</gloss>
1.	A* 2011-03-31 06:20:32 Scott
	Refs:	koj

View entry in alternate formats: jel | edict | jmdict xml | jmnedict xml | jmdictdb xml

jmdict 2621800 Rejected (id: 2088968)
胴丸；筒丸
【どうまる】

1.

[n] [hist]
▶ light armour opening at the right, originally used for infantry combat
▶ dō-maru

History:

29.	R 2020-11-30 00:54:01 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
	Comments:	I was quite satisfied with the position stated by Robin and Marcus. Please don't keep submitting this edit.
28.	A* 2020-11-28 21:34:10 Alan
	Comments:	>I was satisfied with Marcus's version …despite the arguments and evidence against it, and the utter lack of arguments or evidence for it. What is the basis, for favouring his version? Neither you, nor Marcus, have presented any. As such, there is no basis for going with it …or are you saying that you are choosing to go with alternative 4, in the list of options I listed?
	Diff:	@@ -16 +16 @@ -<gloss>light torso armour opening at the right, originally used for infantry combat</gloss> +<gloss>light armour opening at the right, originally used for infantry combat</gloss>
27.	A 2020-11-27 23:56:58 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
	Comments:	I was satisfied with Marcus's version, so I'm putting it back. I've left the commentary here rather than reject the proposed edit (which would relegate it into a separate thread), but I may not do that with future edits. Re the "don't break up URLs into multiple lines", I'm afraid that's an artifact of browsers on some mobile devices, which insert line-break characters at the ends of text boxes.
	Diff:	@@ -16 +16 @@ -<gloss>light armour opening at the right, originally used for infantry combat</gloss> +<gloss>light torso armour opening at the right, originally used for infantry combat</gloss>
26.	A* 2020-11-27 17:36:57 Alan
	Refs:	already cited refs. the previous comments.
	Comments:	>The back-and-forth here reminds me of the quote "perfection is the enemy of good". How so? All you've done, is to insist that the good is unacceptable, because you insist on the bad. For no discernable reason, and without particularly bothering to give any. Certainly not clarity or brevity, and absolutely not accuracy. If you wish to claim that I am letting the perfect, be the enemy of the good, you must first explain how/why what you propose is good, and not bad, and how/why what I propose is inferior. Explain not just how maybe an entry has to be less than perfect in one aspect, for the sake of some other aspect (for example: a bit less explanation, or maybe even accuracy, for the sake of brevity …though I should note that JMdict has a policy of brevity, beyond the level of most other dictionaries), but also how that is relevant to what I propose, in contrast to what you propose. I.e. Don't just make claims about my positions. That is no more than baseless nonsense. Make a case against them! And/or for your own position! "Put up, or shut up", as the saying goes. (this is a general problem, that you people have. You seem to like to just say "no you're wrong. X is how it should be", and insist that everyone just blindly obey. Finding actual discussion and argumentation, to be rude and impudent disruption, rather than the cornerstone of any/all collaboration/cooperation, and the foundation of how one can reach the truth or the best decisions/conclusions …as essentially all other dictionaries and all academic/scientific/scholarly endeavours do) As for the references you have chosen, this time… First of all, don't break up URLs into multiple lines. The first source, in showing a doumaru, shows a full suit of armour. The second source is a kokugo …and I have thoroughly explained why they are not only clearly inferior sources, but that they are also undeniably wrong and full of errors, in their entry on doumaru. Hence, citing them is utterly invalid. As for the third, I do not understand it's inclusion, as it is much briefer than any of the previously cited ones (aside from kokugos) and apparently just some random website mostly just concerned with costumes, and therefore not that bothered with armour. Looking at the comments, I am pleased to see you finally deciding to actually make some kind of argument, to back up your positions (though certainly not in regards to "perfection is the enemy of good"). The one on "infantry" is quite decent. I firmly disagree that it doesn't imply low-status footsoldiers, but then you did also, accurately, point out that it was mainly the low class footsoldiers who wore them initially, making that point rather moot. I still see no reason to insist on "infantry", over "combat on foot". The latter is not particularly longer, nor is it any less clear. That said, given your arguments, there is also not much reason to insist on "combat on foot", over "infantry", so… The second bit, however… >"but if the kokugos don't make a point of mentioning it, I believe it's not a very important point" How is that supposed to be an argument? First of all, that is essentially assuming that the kokugos are infallible, or must be very sensible, on the subject. This is disproven, not only in how they (as can be shown in all other dictionaries [but probably a lot more in Japanese dictionaries, than in English ones. Certainly a LOT more in jp-en/en-jp ones]) have many examples of errors and obvious examples of a lacking understanding of what they are describing, but also in that the _kokugos entries on doumaru, specifically,_ clearly contain obvious, and undeniable, errors. An argument that is clearly and obviously based on a foundation, that has already been thoroughly and undeniably shown to be invalid, cannot be regarded as a serious/honest attempt at an argument. Secondly, you are not making any kind of argument or explanation/clarification of why it wouldn't be an important point (or why it being an important or unimportant point, should matter in the least), but simply making an Argument from (flimsy) Authority, by saying that "they probably have a reason" without bothering to show, come up with, or even think about, the reason. You have four options, when it comes to the torso vs full suit issue: 1. Have the entry merely call it an "armour". (what I went with, and prefer, given how brief the entries are) 2. Have a sense with "torso armour", and a separate one with the no less (far more?) common "full suit" sense. 3. Actually bother to make a case, a serious and honest attempt (valid or not …though it must be a genuine attempt at validity) at a case, for why you can call it a torso armour, without the additional full suit sense. 4. Throw any sense of collaboration, logic, civility, or rational discussion out the window, and simply use your authority to ignore and dismiss all dissent (without listening to or addressing any arguments, however sound) and power through your position, without bothering with any kind of justification. I wouldn't recommend option #4 …though it does seem to be popular here and, by all accounts, quite accepted.
	Diff:	@@ -16 +16 @@ -<gloss>light torso armour opening at the right, originally used for infantry combat</gloss> +<gloss>light armour opening at the right, originally used for infantry combat</gloss>
25.	A 2020-11-27 00:35:36 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...>
	Refs:	https://www.hyogo-c.ed.jp/~rekihaku- bo/historystation/rekihaku-meet/seminar/bugu- kacchuu/kc_intro2.html ...中・下級の徒歩（かち）武者の甲冑として発達したものです。 there's also this: なお、今日胴丸と呼んでいる甲冑は、中世には腹巻と呼ばれており、逆に今日の腹巻を中世には胴丸と呼んでいました。(but let's just not get into it) (daijr: 中世以前はこの形式の鎧を腹巻と呼んでいた。) https://costume.iz2.or.jp/costume/535.html 胴丸は大鎧に次ぐ一般戦士の使用する軽快な武装であった。
	Comments:	The back-and-forth here reminds me of the quote "perfection is the enemy of good". "used" seems better than "made/designed". I'm not seeing how "combat on foot" is an improvement over Robin's "infantry combat" - neither implies low-status footsoldiers, but even if they did, those seem to have been the original wearers anyway (see sources, plus kokugos) so I'm not seeing the issue here. It might be the case that 胴丸 is used to refer to a full suit of armor including the sense 1 torso armor, but if the kokugos don't make a point of mentioning it, I believe it's not a very important point and that we don't have to either.
	Diff:	@@ -16,7 +16 @@ -<gloss>light torso armour opening at the right, originally used for combat on foot</gloss> -<gloss>dō-maru</gloss> -</sense> -<sense> -<pos>&n;</pos> -<misc>&hist;</misc> -<gloss>suit of armour, using such a torso armour</gloss> +<gloss>light torso armour opening at the right, originally used for infantry combat</gloss>
(show/hide 24 older log entries)
24.	A* 2020-11-20 09:38:25 Alan
	Comments:	"I don't think" isn't and argument or clarification. You say it isn't an improvement, but don't explain how or why it isn't. Also, "infantry" is pretty much the same as "foot soldier", including the same problems. As for "torso armour"… Yes, certainly, it is clearer, though I'd argue that if the term "armour" is used, without mention of what part your talking about, people will tend to assume that it is either torso armour, or a full suit of armour, which would be fine, here. But okay. "Torso armour" it is …but then it needs to explicitly state the second sense. (this makes this entry, inconsistent with the other armour entries, BTW)
	Diff:	@@ -16 +16,7 @@ -<gloss>light torso armour opening at the right, originally designed for infantry combat</gloss> +<gloss>light torso armour opening at the right, originally used for combat on foot</gloss> +<gloss>dō-maru</gloss> +</sense> +<sense> +<pos>&n;</pos> +<misc>&hist;</misc> +<gloss>suit of armour, using such a torso armour</gloss>
23.	A 2020-11-20 02:24:01 Robin Scott <...address hidden...>
	Comments:	I don't think those changes improve the gloss. I'm not yielding on the "torso" point. Dropping it makes the gloss less precise and harder to visualise.
	Diff:	@@ -16 +16 @@ -<gloss>light armour opening at the right, originally made for use on foot</gloss> +<gloss>light torso armour opening at the right, originally designed for infantry combat</gloss>
22.	A* 2020-11-19 22:56:50 Alan
	Comments:	Changed "designed" to "made". Better to avoid giving people an idea that the design was changed, when later used on horseback, or that it has features of its design that are better for foot, specifically. It's lighter and more flexible/mobile. Those are benefits, regardless. The weight and inflexible nature of the ooyoroi was a (much) greater problem on foot, than on horseback, but that is a thing about the ooyoroi, not the doumaru. The doumaru works equally well, on horse and foot.
	Diff:	@@ -16 +16 @@ -<gloss>light armour opening at the right, originally designed for use on foot</gloss> +<gloss>light armour opening at the right, originally made for use on foot</gloss>
21.	A* 2020-11-19 22:39:29 Alan
	Comments:	It is no less commonly used to refer to a full suit of armour. You cannot ignore that. To only state the "torso armour" sense, is to implicitly deny the existence of the "full suit" sense. That the kokugos fail to recognize this, is one of the ways in which their entry is clearly wrong. As I've noted, they also claim that it was only used on foot, which is clearly false. This is hardly the only example of kokugos getting things objectively and undeniably wrong. (just as there are some examples of clear and undeniable errors, in many a en-en dictionary, as well. Not to mention jp-en/en-jp dictionaries, which have a large, shocking, amount of errors that are beyond obvious and quite extremely wrong. My go-to example being that practically all en-jp dictionaries translate "hip" as "尻". IIRC there is one, just one, rather minor, en-jp dictionary that doesn't)
	Diff:	@@ -16 +16 @@ -<gloss>light torso armour opening at the right, originally designed for foot soldiers</gloss> +<gloss>light armour opening at the right, originally designed for use on foot</gloss>
20.	A 2020-11-19 17:56:36 Robin Scott <...address hidden...>
	Comments:	The fact that 胴丸 came to be used by other types of soldiers does not change the fact that it was designed for footsoldiers. We can add "originally" to be more precise. "Torso armour" is a crucial detail. 胴 is in the name. I don't think it's necessary to mention that 胴丸 can also refer to the complete suit of armour. The kokugos don't either.
	Diff:	@@ -16 +16 @@ -<gloss>light armour opening at the right</gloss> +<gloss>light torso armour opening at the right, originally designed for foot soldiers</gloss>
19.	A* 2020-11-19 08:05:36 Alan
	Comments:	I have extensively explained why having a single sense calling it a torso armour, is wrong …as well as why claiming that it is for footsoldiers, is wrong in multiple ways.
	Diff:	@@ -16 +16 @@ -<gloss>light torso armour opening at the right (designed for foot soldiers)</gloss> +<gloss>light armour opening at the right</gloss>
18.	A 2020-11-19 05:29:11 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
	Comments:	I'll merge the competing versions and close it.
	Diff:	@@ -16 +16 @@ -<gloss>armour that opens at the right</gloss> +<gloss>light torso armour opening at the right (designed for foot soldiers)</gloss>
17.	A* 2020-11-14 16:44:54 Alan
	Comments:	I.e. reverting to a version that gives a false definition. Okay, so it needs to be short… Seems my impression of how brief the definitions need to be, wasn't really all that off…
	Diff:	@@ -16 +16 @@ -<gloss>light torso armour designed for foot soldiers</gloss> +<gloss>armour that opens at the right</gloss>
16.	A 2020-11-14 11:08:06 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
	Comments:	For a term like this a short explanation is best. People can go off to other sources if they want more. I'm reverting to Robin's previous version.
	Diff:	@@ -16 +16 @@ -<gloss>light armour initially used on foot, but later also from horseback. Opens on the right side</gloss> +<gloss>light torso armour designed for foot soldiers</gloss>
15.	A* 2020-11-14 05:12:29 Alan
	Diff:	@@ -16 +16 @@ -<gloss>light armour that opens on the right side. Initially used on foot, but later also from horseback</gloss> +<gloss>light armour initially used on foot, but later also from horseback. Opens on the right side</gloss>
14.	A* 2020-11-14 05:10:24 Alan
	Comments:	Nothing that contradicts the kokugos? How about: jwiki: "しかし、その後の戦法の変化に伴い、胴丸はしだいに騎乗の上級武士にも用いられるようになり、デザイン的にも上級武士に相応しい華美なものへと発展していく。南北朝時代頃からは、胴丸の武士も兜・大袖を着用することが一般的になった。" myarmoury: "During the Mongolian invasions (1274 and 1281) and especially in the next century, the role of the infantry on the battlefield increased dramatically. Many of the poorer and low-ranking samurai preferred to fight on foot. Although the heavy, box-like o-yoroi was modernized to some degree in the 13th century, it remained quite unsuitable for infantry combat. At the same time, the do-maru's comfort, ease in wear and use on the battlefield made it a favoured replacement for the o-yoroi and other types of armour in such combat." https://www.nihonto.com/a-brief-history-of-japanese-armor/ "The dômaru and haramaki were the first light body armor for infantry. During the Muromachi era, they came to be used with helmets and shoulder guards in the place of ô-yoroi by military commanders." I still question the notion of calling it light, but as some sources do refer to it as such, I'll let it slide. (BTW, anything said of the doumaru, is also true of the haramaki. The only difference being, that the doumaru opens at the right side, and the haramaki at the back. As the ooyoroi died out, it was not quite replaced by the doumaru, but rather by the doumaru and the haramaki) …and, again, suits of armour including a doumaru "cuirass", are also typically (always?) referred to as doumaru. Hence you cannot specify it as "chest armour", unless you also add an extra sense, of a suit of armour with such a chest armour.
	Diff:	@@ -16 +16 @@ -<gloss>light torso armour designed for foot soldiers</gloss> +<gloss>light armour that opens on the right side. Initially used on foot, but later also from horseback</gloss>
13.	A 2020-11-13 23:33:15 Robin Scott <...address hidden...>
	Refs:	jwiki: "胴丸（どうまる）は、日本の鎧の形式の1つ。平安時代中期頃生じたもので、徒歩戦に適した鎧の形式である。 " http://myarmoury.com/feature_jpn_armour.html "At the beginning of this period retainers and servants usually wore simpler armour (do-maru) [...] The warriors who wore do-maru usually walked or ran near the horse of their lord."
	Comments:	That gloss is far too long. I'm not seeing anything in the sources provided that contradicts the kokugo definitions. I think we should drop the mention of samurai altogether to avoid confusion.
	Diff:	@@ -16 +16 @@ -<gloss>torso armour that opens at the right side. Initially made for those on foot, but later came to (along with the haramaki) replace the heavier and less mobile ō-yoroi on horseback as well</gloss> +<gloss>light torso armour designed for foot soldiers</gloss> @@ -18,5 +17,0 @@ -</sense> -<sense> -<pos>&n;</pos> -<misc>&hist;</misc> -<gloss>suit or armour, with such a torso armour</gloss>
12.	A* 2020-11-12 10:19:30 Alan
	Diff:	@@ -16 +16 @@ -<gloss>torso armour that opens at the right side. Initially made for those on foot, but later came to replace the heavier and less mobile ō-yoroi on horseback as well</gloss> +<gloss>torso armour that opens at the right side. Initially made for those on foot, but later came to (along with the haramaki) replace the heavier and less mobile ō-yoroi on horseback as well</gloss>
11.	A* 2020-11-12 09:58:10 Alan
	Comments:	Ah, so the policy is like that? That's more to my liking, actually. I made it so simple and brief, due to my (apparently a bit mistaken) impression of how JMdict is. Okay, a bit more explanatory, then. Not sure if it's best to says "torso armour", and then add a second sense, or if it's better to just say "armour", but… >All the kokugos describe it as light/comfortable/simple armour designed for foot soldiers. …and all the other sources I mention, make it clear that the kokugos are wrong. Certainly, this isn't an encyclopedia and it needs to be shorter. This does not excuse making it clearly wrong, however, nor does it mean that the kokugos are, or possibly could be, more reliable than the other sources I mentioned, in terms of what a doumaru is. BTW, I find it very weird, that English language sources like add a hyphen, in the name. (this is merely a comment on the practice)
	Diff:	@@ -16 +16 @@ -<gloss>light torso armour designed for foot soldiers and later worn by samurai</gloss> +<gloss>torso armour that opens at the right side. Initially made for those on foot, but later came to replace the heavier and less mobile ō-yoroi on horseback as well</gloss> @@ -17,0 +18,5 @@ +</sense> +<sense> +<pos>&n;</pos> +<misc>&hist;</misc> +<gloss>suit or armour, with such a torso armour</gloss>
10.	A 2020-11-12 00:00:14 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
	Refs:	Editorial Policy extracts: (https://www.edrdg.org/wiki/index.php/Editorial_policy) - "provide useful explanations where appropriate. "type of card game" is not very useful - in such a case explain briefly what the card game entails",
9.	A* 2020-11-11 22:26:04 Robin Scott <...address hidden...>
	Refs:	daijr/s, koj, nikk, shinmeikai
	Comments:	All the kokugos describe it as light/comfortable/simple armour designed for foot soldiers. This isn't an encyclopedia so we can't mention everything but we need to include the key details. "Dō-maru" is common in English-language sources so I've added it as a gloss. Please do not delete the exiting gloss unless you wish to improve upon it. "A type of armour" is not a helpful translation.
	Diff:	@@ -16 +16,2 @@ -<gloss>type of armour</gloss> +<gloss>light torso armour designed for foot soldiers and later worn by samurai</gloss> +<gloss>dō-maru</gloss>
8.	A* 2020-11-11 07:27:10 Alan
	Comments:	What's the basis for the description as "light"? It is lighter than the ooyoroi, certainly, but that says more about the ooyoroi. (which was, as I've explained, later replaced by the doumaru, with no one using the relatively heavy and inflexible oyoroi, anymore. Though, to be fair to the oyoroi, it was used for several centuries) As for "chest armour": As per the 丸, it wraps around the torso/胴 (with, as previously mentioned, an opening at the right side), thus covering the sides and back as well …and has bits that drape down all the way to the thighs. So it doesn't just cover the chest, but also the sides and back, as well as abdomen and upper thighs. The term "cuirass" does at least mean an armour that covers both the front and back of the chest-area (but not the things that drape down, to protect further down), and is hence decently okay as a description/translation, but "chest armour" is far too inaccurate and misleading. Also, "used primarily by foot soldiers and later by samurai" is quite wrong, on two counts. "primarily by" is wrong, unless ones adds a "at first" or "initially" before it …and, as I said, footsoldiers implies (outright means?) common soldiers, but some samurai also fought on foot. Though as the sentence later states "…and later by samurai", it's far more than an implication.
	Diff:	@@ -16 +16 @@ -<gloss>light chest armour used primarily by foot soldiers and later by samurai</gloss> +<gloss>type of armour</gloss>
7.	A 2020-11-10 23:01:47 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
	Comments:	Looks good to me.
6.	A* 2020-11-10 18:12:49 Robin Scott <...address hidden...>
	Refs:	daijr
	Comments:	I'd go with this.
	Diff:	@@ -16,6 +16 @@ -<gloss>A type of Japanese cuirass.</gloss> -</sense> -<sense> -<pos>&n;</pos> -<misc>&hist;</misc> -<gloss>suit of armour, with such a cuirass</gloss> +<gloss>light chest armour used primarily by foot soldiers and later by samurai</gloss>
5.	A* 2020-11-10 13:59:21 Alan
	Refs:	http://myarmoury.com/feature_jpn_armour.html (though it doesn't explicitly state that it was used on horseback) https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/胴丸 https://www.nihonto.com/a-brief-history-of-japanese-armor/
	Comments:	Whilst doumaru were, initially, used by retainers/ashigaru, they were later used by samurai, as well. Initially poorer samurai and/or ones that fought on foot, but was later also used by rich and/or horse-riding samurai as well, replacing the ooyoroi (which they had used before) What is sometimes called a cuirass, does also include what one might call faulds, which drape down over the lower parts, all the way down to the thighs. Hence "cuirass" is not an entirely accurate description …but it's close enough, I suppose.
	Diff:	@@ -16 +16,6 @@ -<gloss>simple cuirass worn by footsoldiers</gloss> +<gloss>A type of Japanese cuirass.</gloss> +</sense> +<sense> +<pos>&n;</pos> +<misc>&hist;</misc> +<gloss>suit of armour, with such a cuirass</gloss>
4.	A* 2020-11-10 11:54:17
	Refs:	Daijisen
	Diff:	@@ -15 +15,2 @@ -<gloss>A type of Japanese armour.</gloss> +<misc>&hist;</misc> +<gloss>simple cuirass worn by footsoldiers</gloss>
3.	A* 2020-11-10 10:14:45 Alan
	Comments:	"Medieval" refers to a European time period. It is sometimes used for a somewhat analogous period in Japanese history, but… such use either needs clarification, or clear context. (one might argue that the latter is true, here, but… I wouldn't fully agree) Also, "lacking a solid breastplate and sleeves" is not a distinguishing feature of the doumaru, as that is true of almost all Japanese armours. Either this needs a far more thorough description, that refers to it's actual distinguishing features (that it wraps around the person, with an opening at the right side, being the most notable) …or just note that it's a Japanese armour, and let people look it up in an encyclopedia and/or a more armour/militaria dedicated resource.
	Diff:	@@ -15 +15 @@ -<gloss>medieval armour lacking a solid breastplate and sleeves</gloss> +<gloss>A type of Japanese armour.</gloss>
2.	A 2011-03-31 07:15:35 Rene Malenfant <...address hidden...>
	Refs:	wiki
	Diff:	@@ -15,1 +15,1 @@ -<gloss>medieval armor</gloss> +<gloss>medieval armour lacking a solid breastplate and sleeves</gloss>
1.	A* 2011-03-31 06:20:32 Scott
	Refs:	koj

View entry in alternate formats: jel | edict | jmdict xml | jmnedict xml | jmdictdb xml

jmdict 2624730 Active (id: 2088417)
雛あられ；雛霰
【ひなあられ】

1.

[n] [uk]
▶ sweetened rice-flour cakes for offering at the Dolls' Festival

History:

9.	A 2020-11-20 11:20:45 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
8.	A* 2020-11-20 08:24:38 Opencooper
	Refs:	G n-grams: 雛霰 365 雛あられ 14906 ひなあられ 31046
	Diff:	@@ -5 +5 @@ -<keb>雛霰</keb> +<keb>雛あられ</keb> @@ -8 +8 @@ -<keb>雛あられ</keb> +<keb>雛霰</keb>
7.	A 2015-11-10 11:26:10 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
6.	A* 2015-11-10 08:50:24
	Refs:	n-grams (~2:1)
	Diff:	@@ -14,0 +15 @@ +<misc>&uk;</misc>
5.	A 2013-03-02 02:49:44 Rene Malenfant <...address hidden...>
(show/hide 4 older log entries)
4.	A* 2013-03-01 21:06:14 Scott
	Diff:	@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@ +</k_ele> +<k_ele> +<keb>雛あられ</keb>
3.	A 2011-04-18 05:11:23 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
2.	A* 2011-04-17 22:16:19 Rene Malenfant <...address hidden...>
	Refs:	gg5
	Comments:	following the def of あられ
	Diff:	@@ -12,1 +12,3 @@ -<gloss>candy offered to dolls for the dolls' festival</gloss> +<xref type="see" seq="1373440">雛祭り</xref> +<xref type="see" seq="1373440">雛祭り</xref> +<gloss>sweetened rice-flour cakes for offering at the Dolls' Festival</gloss>
1.	A* 2011-04-11 18:15:44 Scott
	Refs:	nikk daijs

View entry in alternate formats: jel | edict | jmdict xml | jmnedict xml | jmdictdb xml

jmdict 2830789 Active (id: 2088444)
鏘々；鏘鏘
【そうそう；しょうしょう】

1.	[adj-t,adv-to] [obs] ▶ lively ▶ active ▶ energetic ▶ enthusiastic
2.	[adv-to,adj-t] [arch] ▶ tinkling (of metal, jewels, etc.) ▶ ringing brightly
3.	[adv-to,adj-t] [arch] ▶ crying (of a Chinese phoenix)

History:

4.	A 2020-11-20 22:01:33 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
3.	A* 2020-11-20 20:38:22 Robin Scott <...address hidden...>
	Refs:	daijr/s
	Comments:	Added sense. Appears in 吾輩は猫である.
	Diff:	@@ -5 +5 @@ -<keb>鏘鏘</keb> +<keb>鏘々</keb> @@ -8 +8 @@ -<keb>鏘々</keb> +<keb>鏘鏘</keb> @@ -17 +17,9 @@ -<pos>&n;</pos> +<pos>&adj-t;</pos> +<pos>&adv-to;</pos> +<misc>&obs;</misc> +<gloss>lively</gloss> +<gloss>active</gloss> +<gloss>energetic</gloss> +<gloss>enthusiastic</gloss> +</sense> +<sense> @@ -21,2 +29,2 @@ -<gloss>tinkling sound (esp. bell on the Emperor's carriage)</gloss> -<gloss>bright sound of metal being struck</gloss> +<gloss>tinkling (of metal, jewels, etc.)</gloss> +<gloss>ringing brightly</gloss> @@ -25 +33,2 @@ -<pos>&n;</pos> +<pos>&adv-to;</pos> +<pos>&adj-t;</pos> @@ -27 +36 @@ -<gloss>cry of the phoenix</gloss> +<gloss>crying (of a Chinese phoenix)</gloss>
2.	A 2017-01-29 04:50:17 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
	Refs:	Refs don't line up that well. Rather obscure anyway.
	Diff:	@@ -17,0 +18,2 @@ +<pos>&adv-to;</pos> +<pos>&adj-t;</pos> @@ -19 +21 @@ -<gloss>tinkling sound</gloss> +<gloss>tinkling sound (esp. bell on the Emperor's carriage)</gloss> @@ -25 +26,0 @@ -<gloss>tinkling of the bell on the Emperor's carriage</gloss>
1.	A* 2016-12-15 15:09:44 Scott
	Refs:	koj daij

View entry in alternate formats: jel | edict | jmdict xml | jmnedict xml | jmdictdb xml

jmdict 2833088 Active (id: 2088436)

えずくろしい；えづくろしい

1.

[adj-i] Dialect: kyb
▶ unpleasant
▶ gross
▶ gaudy

Cross references:
	⇒ see: 1565530 【えずく】 1. to vomit; to throw up; to feel nauseated; to feel sick

Conjugations

History:

4.	A 2020-11-20 19:50:19 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
3.	A* 2020-11-20 11:57:01 Robin Scott <...address hidden...>
	Comments:	Not a noun.
	Diff:	@@ -11,3 +11,2 @@ -<pos>&n;</pos> -<xref type="see" seq="1565530">嘔吐く・えずく</xref> -<xref type="see" seq="2833073">気持ちが悪い</xref> +<pos>&adj-i;</pos> +<xref type="see" seq="1565530">えずく</xref>
2.	A 2017-08-28 01:36:44 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
	Diff:	@@ -11,0 +12 @@ +<xref type="see" seq="1565530">嘔吐く・えずく</xref>
1.	A* 2017-08-06 17:57:18 Scott
	Refs:	http://www.weblio.jp/content/えずくろしい http://d.hatena.ne.jp/keyword/�� https://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q11114932656
	Comments:	related to えずく according to chiebukuro

View entry in alternate formats: jel | edict | jmdict xml | jmnedict xml | jmdictdb xml

jmdict 2834023 Active (id: 2088390)
あおり運転；煽り運転
【あおりうんてん】

1.

[n]
▶ road rage
▶ tailgating

Cross references:
	⇒ see: 1391630 煽る 6. to tailgate

History:

8.	A 2020-11-20 04:52:01 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
	Comments:	OK. That's simpler.
	Diff:	@@ -15,0 +16 @@ +<gloss>road rage</gloss> @@ -17,5 +17,0 @@ -</sense> -<sense> -<pos>&n;</pos> -<gloss>dangerous driving</gloss> -<gloss>road rage</gloss>
7.	A* 2020-11-19 12:47:12 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...>
	Comments:	I don't think it's 2 senses. I think it's something that encompasses tailgating and road rage, but is mainly about somehow threatening the other driver. "dangerous driving" is wrong, I believe.
6.	A 2020-11-19 01:30:45 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
	Comments:	I think that proposed second sense seems to cover it OK.
	Diff:	@@ -20 +20,2 @@ -<gloss>dangerous driving, road rage</gloss> +<gloss>dangerous driving</gloss> +<gloss>road rage</gloss>
5.	A* 2020-11-18 08:07:47
	Refs:	daijs cont 補説]明確な定義はないが、車間距離を著しく詰めたり幅寄せを行ったりするほか、不要な急ブレーキ、蛇行運転、執拗 (しつよう) なパッシングやクラクションの使用などが該当する。「あおり【煽り】」の全ての意味を見る
4.	A* 2020-11-18 08:06:29
	Refs:	daijs 走行中、他の自動車に対して恐怖感・威圧感を与えるような運転をすること。
(show/hide 3 older log entries)
3.	A* 2020-11-18 02:45:16 Paul Barnier <...address hidden...>
	Refs:	https://www.gov-online.go.jp/useful/article/202006/1.html https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/あおり運転 https://jico-pro.com/magazine/103/
	Comments:	The examples I have seen given (see the above references) seem to go beyond just tailgating to include other types of road rage/ harrassment such as swerving, overtaking, switching on high beam lights and so on. I have tried to edit the Meaning entry, but I don't feel really confident to say I have the exact sense of the word, other than that it seems to refer to a general category of behaviour of which tailgating is only one case.
	Diff:	@@ -17,0 +18,4 @@ +<sense> +<pos>&n;</pos> +<gloss>dangerous driving, road rage</gloss> +</sense>
2.	A 2017-12-13 04:17:14 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
1.	A* 2017-12-12 14:38:27 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...>
	Refs:	daijr, chiezou, wiki https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/あおり%E 9%81%8B%E8%BB%A2

View entry in alternate formats: jel | edict | jmdict xml | jmnedict xml | jmdictdb xml

jmdict 2836877 Active (id: 2088458)
違くない；違うくない
【ちがくない (違くない)；ちがうくない (違うくない) 】

1.

[exp] [col]
《grammatically incorrect negation of 違う》
▶ isn't it (that) different (from usual, from what one could expect, etc.)?
▶ isn't that wrong?

Cross references:
	⇒ see: 1158880 違う 1. to differ (from); to be different; to be distinct; to be unlike; to vary; to disagree (with)

2.

[exp] [col]
《as a response to a question containing 違う》
▶ no, that's wrong
▶ it's not like that
▶ that's not the case

History:

3.	A 2020-11-20 23:50:15 Robin Scott <...address hidden...>
	Diff:	@@ -20,3 +20 @@ -<xref type="see" seq="1158880">違う・ちがう・1</xref> -<xref type="see" seq="1158880">違う・ちがう・2</xref> -<xref type="see" seq="1158880">違う・ちがう・3</xref> +<xref type="see" seq="1158880">違う・1</xref> @@ -25 +23 @@ -<gloss>isn't it (that) different (from usual, or from what one could expect, etc.)?</gloss> +<gloss>isn't it (that) different (from usual, from what one could expect, etc.)?</gloss>
2.	A 2018-10-24 02:05:00 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
1.	A* 2018-10-24 00:25:23 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...>
	Refs:	g ngrams ちがわない 3788 ちがうくない 227 違わない 196253 違うくない 3551 違くない 12811 ちがくない 3497 I think it's more common spoken than written, though. 違くない is a lot more common than 違うくない on twitter too. https://www.nhk.or.jp/bunken/summary/kotoba/term/045.html (2000) "Q:「違くない」という言い方は、なぜいけないのでしょうか。私は自然に使ってしまいますが。 A:「違くない」「違かった」「違くて」という言い方は、最近とても増えています。これがふさわしくない理由は、「違う」が形容詞ではなくて動詞だからです。" https://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q12143171217 (2015) "「違うくない」という表現について。同じ大学の友人がよく「違うくない」という表現を使います。使い方は「それは違うくない?」という感じです。 (それは違うんじゃないか、という意味?) なんとなく違和感があるのですが、その友人は山形県出身なのでもし方言だったなら間違っていると言うのは失礼かと思い指摘できず・・・。" "「ちがう」「ちがいます」は動詞なんですが、名詞の「ちがい」の「い」に引かれて、形容詞活用する人がいます。「ちかい」→「ちかくない」「ちがい」→「ちがくない」あなたのご友人の言う＞「違うくない」のように、さらに、動詞の形「ちがう」を残したまま、形容詞語尾の「く」をつけるという人もいますが、ちょっとめずらしいですね。" "私も若者ですが、違うくない、とは誰も使いませんよ。" "きっと幼児語ですよ。" https://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q14171331754 (2017) "「違うくない」は関西弁ですか？？" "多分関西弁ではないと思います俺は中部ですがよく使ったりしますよ！" "いいえ。普通です(・_・;)" "それ、関西じゃなくても使う人いるよね。" "関西人です「違うくない」は関西弁かは、分からないのですが、関西では、普通に使います人によっては、「ちゃうくない」と、いいます"
	Comments:	See also すきくない。 hard to gloss

View entry in alternate formats: jel | edict | jmdict xml | jmnedict xml | jmdictdb xml

jmdict 2837572 Active (id: 2290680)

サードウェーブコーヒー；サード・ウェーブ・コーヒー

1.

[n]
▶ third-wave coffee (21st century movement to produce high-quality coffee)

History:

7.	A 2024-01-31 20:38:39 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
6.	A* 2024-01-31 05:14:24
	Comments:	this is more common Not necessarily the movement, can just refer to the coffee I'd skip the explanation
	Diff:	@@ -12 +12 @@ -<gloss>third wave of coffee (21st century movement to produce high-quality coffee)</gloss> +<gloss>third-wave coffee (21st century movement to produce high-quality coffee)</gloss>
5.	A 2020-11-20 23:37:59 Robin Scott <...address hidden...>
	Comments:	Not a Japanese concept.
	Diff:	@@ -12,2 +12 @@ -<gloss>third wave of coffee</gloss> -<gloss g_type="expl">21st century movement to produce high-quality coffee</gloss> +<gloss>third wave of coffee (21st century movement to produce high-quality coffee)</gloss>
4.	A 2018-12-12 17:43:20 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
	Comments:	No harm.
3.	A* 2018-12-12 14:40:17 Robin Scott <...address hidden...>
	Comments:	Worth having a short explanation?
	Diff:	@@ -12,0 +13 @@ +<gloss g_type="expl">21st century movement to produce high-quality coffee</gloss>
(show/hide 2 older log entries)
2.	A 2018-12-12 09:02:50 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
	Refs:	https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third_wave_of_coffee
	Diff:	@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@ +</r_ele> +<r_ele> +<reb>サード・ウェーブ・コーヒー</reb>
1.	A* 2018-12-12 01:08:09 Scott
	Refs:	wiki

View entry in alternate formats: jel | edict | jmdict xml | jmnedict xml | jmdictdb xml

jmdict 2844918 Active (id: 2088429)
モテ度
【モテど】

1.

[n] [col]
▶ level of popularity (with the opposite sex)
▶ degree of attractiveness

Cross references:
	⇒ see: 2640260 モテる 1. to be popular (esp. with the opposite sex); to be well liked; to be pampered (spoiled, doted upon, etc.); to be welcomed

History:

5.	A 2020-11-20 12:03:04 Robin Scott <...address hidden...>
	Diff:	@@ -12,0 +13 @@ +<misc>&col;</misc>
4.	A 2020-11-19 02:18:43 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
	Diff:	@@ -11,0 +12 @@ +<xref type="see" seq="2640260">モテる</xref>
3.	A 2020-05-28 12:37:27 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
2.	A* 2020-05-28 07:57:21 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...>
	Refs:	モテ度 55179
	Diff:	@@ -12 +12,2 @@ -<gloss>level of popularity (esp. with the opposite sex)</gloss> +<gloss>level of popularity (with the opposite sex)</gloss> +<gloss>degree of attractiveness</gloss>
1.	A* 2020-05-28 05:21:18 Nicolas Maia
	Refs:	https://www.sugoren.com/search/モテ度 https://www.tofugu.com/japan/the-reason-i-dont-want-to-dye-my-hair-black-again/
	Comments:	A bit of a heteronormative definition but I don't know how else to put it.

View entry in alternate formats: jel | edict | jmdict xml | jmnedict xml | jmdictdb xml

jmdict 2846918 Active (id: 2238253)
舐めプレイ
【なめプレイ；ナメプレイ (nokanji) 】

1.	[n,vs] [sl] {video games} ▶ going insultingly easy on an opponent ▶ not trying one's best
2.	[n,vs] [sl] ▶ licking (as a part of sexual intercourse)

Conjugations

History:

7.	A 2023-05-24 01:23:28 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
	Comments:	Probably not necessarily given the preceding gloss.
6.	A* 2023-05-23 06:56:25 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...>
	Comments:	didn't really add much I felt?
	Diff:	@@ -20 +20 @@ -<gloss>not trying one's best (due to the perceived low amount of effort required)</gloss> +<gloss>not trying one's best</gloss>
5.	A 2020-11-20 19:56:56 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
4.	A* 2020-11-20 13:27:09 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...>
	Refs:	google images (nsfw)
	Diff:	@@ -20,0 +21,6 @@ +</sense> +<sense> +<pos>&n;</pos> +<pos>&vs;</pos> +<misc>&sl;</misc> +<gloss>licking (as a part of sexual intercourse)</gloss>
3.	A 2020-11-20 12:04:39 Robin Scott <...address hidden...>
	Diff:	@@ -17,0 +18 @@ +<misc>&sl;</misc>
(show/hide 2 older log entries)
2.	A 2020-11-19 10:52:20 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
	Refs:	舐めプレイ 1620 舐めたプレイ 24 舐めプ 24 ナメプレイ 194 ナメプ < 20 https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/舐めプレイ
	Comments:	Better to have 舐めプレイ, which is far more common. Wiktionary says it's an abbreviation of 舐めたプレイ.
	Diff:	@@ -5 +5 @@ -<keb>舐めプ</keb> +<keb>舐めプレイ</keb> @@ -8 +8 @@ -<reb>なめプ</reb> +<reb>なめプレイ</reb> @@ -11 +11,2 @@ -<reb>ナメプ</reb> +<reb>ナメプレイ</reb> +<re_nokanji/> @@ -16,2 +17,3 @@ -<misc>&net-sl;</misc> -<gloss>not trying one's best due to the perceived low amount of effort required to win/pass/succeed</gloss> +<field>&vidg;</field> +<gloss>going insultingly easy on an opponent</gloss> +<gloss>not trying one's best (due to the perceived low amount of effort required)</gloss>
1.	A* 2020-10-04 14:56:41 Sebastien Guillemot <...address hidden...>
	Refs:	https://www.tutitatu.com/「舐めプ」の使い方や意味、例文や類義語を徹底/ https://dic.nicovideo.jp/a/舐めプレイ
	Comments:	Short for 舐めプレイ

View entry in alternate formats: jel | edict | jmdict xml | jmnedict xml | jmdictdb xml

jmdict 2847422 Active (id: 2088462)
中止犯
【ちゅうしはん】

1.

[n] {law}
▶ would-be crime abandoned before being carried out

History:

5.	A 2020-11-21 00:15:03 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
	Comments:	Probably.
4.	A* 2020-11-20 23:40:36 Robin Scott <...address hidden...>
	Comments:	Better to stick to the passive voice?
	Diff:	@@ -13 +13 @@ -<gloss>would-be crime abandoned before carrying it out</gloss> +<gloss>would-be crime abandoned before being carried out</gloss>
3.	A 2020-11-19 05:07:51 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
	Comments:	Oops
	Diff:	@@ -13 +13 @@ -<gloss>would-be crime abandoned carrying it out</gloss> +<gloss>would-be crime abandoned before carrying it out</gloss>
2.	A 2020-11-19 01:38:31 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
	Refs:	GG5
	Diff:	@@ -13 +13 @@ -<gloss>voluntary suspension of your own crime prior to completing it</gloss> +<gloss>would-be crime abandoned carrying it out</gloss>
1.	A* 2020-11-12 09:14:34 Jim Rose <...address hidden...>
	Refs:	From a television show on a graduate law school for judges and prosecutors. 1）犯罪が既遂に達する前に自己の意思によりこれを中止すること https://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/word/中止未遂/#jn-143325 Synonymous with 中止未遂：犯罪の実行に着手した犯人が、自己の意思で実行をやめるか、または結果の発生を防止すること。刑が減軽または免除される。中止犯。 →障害未遂
	Comments:	There could also be new entries for 中止未遂 and 障害未遂.

View entry in alternate formats: jel | edict | jmdict xml | jmnedict xml | jmdictdb xml

jmdict 2847423 Active (id: 2088455)
幸いにも
【さいわいにも】

1.

[adv]
▶ luckily
▶ blessedly
▶ fortunately

History:

3.	A 2020-11-20 23:38:52 Robin Scott <...address hidden...>
	Comments:	Not sure whether this should be exp or adv.
2.	A 2020-11-19 03:26:05 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
	Refs:	リーダーズ+プラス幸いにも 269194 GG5 examples, 10 Tanaka sentences (out of 48 for 幸い).
	Comments:	Worth having.
	Diff:	@@ -12,0 +13 @@ +<gloss>blessedly</gloss>
1.	A* 2020-11-12 10:54:54
	Refs:	https://www.weblio.jp/content/幸いにも https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=幸いにも

View entry in alternate formats: jel | edict | jmdict xml | jmnedict xml | jmdictdb xml

jmdict 2847488 Active (id: 2088446)
時間が経つ
【じかんがたつ】

1.

[exp,v5t]
▶ time passes

Conjugations

History:

5.	A 2020-11-20 22:16:28 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
	Comments:	I agree. I see there are two Tanaka sentences, which I'll index to this. They both use 時間が経つの, which accounts for about 30% of the use of this expression.
4.	A* 2020-11-20 01:23:26 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...>
	Comments:	Outside of this, we also have 時間が開く and 時間がかかる. I don't think it hurts to include extremely common collocations like this one.
3.	A* 2020-11-19 15:24:09 Robin Scott <...address hidden...>
	Refs:	時が経つ 112419
	Comments:	Is this needed? It's an extremely basic sentence. It's also not the only way of saying "time passes".
2.	A 2020-11-19 02:24:50 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
	Refs:	時間が経つ 385444 時間が経っ 327026 時間が経って 248995
	Comments:	Not exactly idiomatic. but very common.
1.	A* 2020-11-18 12:46:35 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...>
	Refs:	時間が経つ 385505

View entry in alternate formats: jel | edict | jmdict xml | jmnedict xml | jmdictdb xml

jmdict 2847489 Active (id: 2088762)
時間が経つにつれて；時間がたつにつれて；時間が経つに連れて
【じかんがたつにつれて】

1.

[exp]
▶ as time passes
▶ with the passing of time
▶ with time

History:

10.	A 2020-11-26 02:39:08 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
	Comments:	Interesting discussion over the past week or so, but I still think it's worth having.
9.	A* 2020-11-24 01:06:57 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...>
	Refs:	ハイパー英語辞書 also has「時間が経つにつれて」as "gradually" eij also has an entry for "時間がたつにつれ" without the て実用・現代用語和英辞典 has "▼時間が経つにつれて as time goes on" as a subentry in its 時間がたつ entry. prog ei-wa: "with [given] time 時がたつにつれて，そのうち，やがて" other constructions meaning much the same thing are much less common in the ngrams: 時間が経つにつれて 44996 時間がたつにつれて 19033 _ 時が経つにつれて　 10426 時がたつにつれて　 3350 時間がたつとともに 847 時間が経つと共に　 1136 時間が経つとともに 1709 時間がたつと共に　 226 年月が経つにつれて 1279 年月がたつにつれて 456 時の経過とともに　 5369　(in the goo collocation dic) 時の経過と共に　　 2960　('') 時間の経過につれて 1097　時の経過につれて 123　日がたつにつれて 4609 年がたつにつれて 390 the fact that this one particular phrasing is so much more common than several other perfectly acceptable ways of saying the same thing does make it a set phrase, to my mind. (I also feel 時が経つにつれて is a set phrase and wouldn't oppose including it as an entry)
	Comments:	"Although JMdict does have Japanese users, the dictionary is not aimed at them. Our criteria for inclusion makes no mention of native speakers. I don't think it should be a factor here (or on any proposed entry)." I disagree Japanese users shouldn't be a factor (but it's true they're not mentioned in the criteria for inclusion). (side-track, but I've been thinking about ways to make the dictionary more useful for Japanese people, like replacing things like [note="also written X"] with [note_also_written="X"], etc. so that more notes could be translated into Japanese with less effort.)
	Diff:	@@ -19,0 +20 @@ +<gloss>with time</gloss>
8.	A* 2020-11-24 00:11:37 Robin Scott <...address hidden...>
	Comments:	I don't think I would describe it as a set phrase. It's very much a sum of parts expression, with no figurative or idiomatic component (時間が[time]経つ[passes]につれて[as]). I'm not seeing a reason for adding it. Although JMdict does have Japanese users, the dictionary is not aimed at them. Our criteria for inclusion makes no mention of native speakers. I don't think it should be a factor here (or on any proposed entry).
7.	A* 2020-11-20 04:36:36 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...>
	Diff:	@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@ +</k_ele> +<k_ele> +<keb>時間がたつにつれて</keb>
6.	A* 2020-11-20 04:32:10 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...>
	Refs:	eij has this btw (as　時間がたつにつれて 19033)
	Comments:	I think we both agree it's a common set phrase? Like you said, any proficient speaker of Japanese should know this phrase. I don't know if it's relecant to decide how much of a set phrase it is by comparing it to the English "as time passes". Rene has a point, but this dictionary has Japanese users too who are not unlikely to try and look up how to say this in English. (actually, the first thing google suggested for me for 時間が経つにつれて was ... 英語)
(show/hide 5 older log entries)
5.	A* 2020-11-20 02:52:23 Robin Scott <...address hidden...>
	Comments:	I don't agree. There are only so many ways someone could try to form a phrase with this meaning and 時間が経つにつれて would probably be one of the top guesses. につれて is N3 grammar. But anyone "reasonably proficient in Japanese" would have encountered 時間が経つにつれて before so I don't think that criteria applies anyway. And as Rene previously pointed out: "that line of editorial policy is designed to justify the inclusion of some less-than-dictionary-like japanese headwords for the purpose of E-J lookups. but if the english is also not the kind of thing that you'd find in a dictionary or expect someone to search for, then it doesn't really apply." It's very unlikely someone would look up "as time passes".
4.	A* 2020-11-20 02:01:29 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...>
	Comments:	One of our criteria for inclusion is "is it not what someone reasonably proficient in Japanese would come up with when trying to express the English meaning in Japanese?" I don't think any non-native speaker would come up with this without being already familiar with the phrase.
3.	A* 2020-11-19 16:06:51 Robin Scott <...address hidden...>
	Refs:	時が経つにつれて 10426
	Comments:	I don't think there's anything noteworthy about this combination of words and how they're being used. It's not a set phrase any more than "as time passes" is. You can also say 時が経つにつれ(て).
2.	A 2020-11-19 02:25:18 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
1.	A* 2020-11-18 12:48:21 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...>
	Refs:	時間が経つにつれて 44996 時間が経つに連れて 6843
	Comments:	set phrase

View entry in alternate formats: jel | edict | jmdict xml | jmnedict xml | jmdictdb xml

jmdict 2847491 Active (id: 2088453)
第一波；第１波
【だいいっぱ】

1.

[n]
▶ first wave

History:

3.	A 2020-11-20 23:36:18 Robin Scott <...address hidden...>
	Comments:	I think "third wave" is pushing it.
2.	A 2020-11-19 01:12:46 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
	Comments:	May as well have the third.
1.	A* 2020-11-19 00:45:31 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...>
	Refs:	heard on tv
	Comments:	since we have "second wave"? we could also add the currently relevant 第三波, possibly?

View entry in alternate formats: jel | edict | jmdict xml | jmnedict xml | jmdictdb xml

jmdict 2847493 Active (id: 2088507)
成るべくなら
【なるべくなら】

1.

[exp] [uk]
▶ if possible
▶ preferably
▶ if circumstances allow

History:

6.	A 2020-11-21 20:06:19 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
5.	A* 2020-11-21 17:34:29 Robin Scott <...address hidden...>
	Refs:	gg5, eij
	Diff:	@@ -14,2 +14,2 @@ -<gloss>would rather</gloss> -<gloss>by preference</gloss> +<gloss>preferably</gloss> +<gloss>if circumstances allow</gloss>
4.	A 2020-11-20 11:24:12 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
	Refs:	成るべくなら 495
3.	A* 2020-11-20 09:07:19
	Diff:	@@ -5 +5 @@ -<keb>成可なら</keb> +<keb>成るべくなら</keb>
2.	A 2020-11-20 04:49:47 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
	Refs:	なるべくなら 76456 GG5, Eijiro, ルミナス
	Comments:	1 Tanaka sentence.
	Diff:	@@ -13,0 +14,2 @@ +<gloss>would rather</gloss> +<gloss>by preference</gloss>
(show/hide 1 older log entries)
1.	A* 2020-11-19 19:27:28 Daru <...address hidden...>
	Refs:	https://kotobank.jp/word/成可なら-2070412
	Comments:	A confusing expression if looking at the components alone.

View entry in alternate formats: jel | edict | jmdict xml | jmnedict xml | jmdictdb xml

jmdict 2847494 Active (id: 2281886)
行きはよいよい帰りは怖い；行きは良い良い帰りは怖い [sK] ；行きはよいよい帰りはこわい [sK] ；いきはよいよい帰りは怖い [sK]
【いきはよいよいかえりはこわい；ゆきはよいよいかえりはこわい】

1.

[exp,adj-i] [proverb]
《from the Edo-period children's song "Tōryanse"》
▶ going there is easy but coming back is scary

Conjugations

History:

11.	A 2023-11-01 10:44:44 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
10.	A* 2023-11-01 07:51:22 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...>
	Refs:	e.g. 行きはよいよい 16171 80.1% いきはよいよい 887 4.4% ゆきはよいよい 31 0.2% 行きは良い良い 3096 15.3% よいよい帰りは怖い 3222 53.9% よいよい帰りはこわい 1390 23.3% よいよい帰りは恐い 446 7.5% 良い良い帰りは怖い 765 12.8% 良い良い帰りはこわい 36 0.6% 良い良い帰りは恐い 117 2.0%
9.	A* 2023-11-01 07:48:33 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...>
	Comments:	Since the actual meaning isnt well understood, I think a more literl gloss makes more sense. Btw isn't the string too long for the ngrams? See the ones I ｐosted when I originally submitted this.
	Diff:	@@ -30 +30 @@ -<gloss>going there is easy but coming back is hard</gloss> +<gloss>going there is easy but coming back is scary</gloss>
8.	A* 2023-11-01 05:24:22 Stephen Kraus <...address hidden...>
	Refs:	〈行／い／ゆ〉きは〈良／よ〉い〈良／よ〉い〈帰／かえ〉りは〈怖／こわ〉い Google N-gram Corpus Counts ╭─ーーーーーーーーーーーーーー─┬────╮ │ 行きはよいよい帰りは怖い　　 │ 0 │ │ 行きは良い良い帰りは怖い　　 │ 0 │ - sK │ 行きはよいよい帰りはこわい　 │ 0 │ - sK │ いきはよいよい帰りは怖い　　 │ 59 │ - add, sK │ いきはよいよいかえりはこわい │ 0 │ │ ゆきはよいよいかえりはこわい │ 0 │ ╰─ーーーーーーーーーーーーーー─┴────╯
	Diff:	@@ -8,0 +9 @@ +<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf> @@ -11,0 +13,5 @@ +<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf> +</k_ele> +<k_ele> +<keb>いきはよいよい帰りは怖い</keb> +<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
7.	A 2022-08-01 04:02:32 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
	Comments:	Add POS to proverbs -- via bulkupd.py --
	Diff:	@@ -20,0 +21 @@ +<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
(show/hide 6 older log entries)
6.	A 2022-02-03 11:31:29 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
	Diff:	@@ -22 +22 @@ -<s_inf>from the Edo-period children's song "Tooryanse"</s_inf> +<s_inf>from the Edo-period children's song "Tōryanse"</s_inf>
5.	A* 2022-02-02 13:54:16
	Refs:	https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/通りゃんせ
	Diff:	@@ -22 +22 @@ -<s_inf>from the Edo-period children's song "Odoryanse"</s_inf> +<s_inf>from the Edo-period children's song "Tooryanse"</s_inf>
4.	A 2020-12-31 15:58:19 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...>
	Comments:	Si.
3.	A* 2020-12-31 12:45:19 Timofei Shatrov <...address hidden...>
	Comments:	typo?
	Diff:	@@ -14 +14 @@ -<reb>いきはよいといかえりはこわい</reb> +<reb>いきはよいよいかえりはこわい</reb>
2.	A 2020-11-20 11:31:23 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
	Refs:	GG5: Getting there is easy; the way back is hard. Eijiro: うそつきの世間渡りは、行きはよいよい帰りは怖い。 : A liar can go round the world but cannot come back.
	Comments:	Less literal, but seems to work.
	Diff:	@@ -23 +23 @@ -<gloss>going there is easy but coming back is scary</gloss> +<gloss>going there is easy but coming back is hard</gloss>
1.	A* 2020-11-20 07:48:05 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...>
	Refs:	jitsuyo, ことわざを知る辞典 (kotobank) 行きはよいよい 16171 いきはよいよい 887 ゆきはよいよい 31 行きは良い良い 3096 よいよい帰りは怖い 3222 よいよい帰りはこわい 1390 よいよい帰りは恐い 446
	Comments:	"真意は不明"

View entry in alternate formats: jel | edict | jmdict xml | jmnedict xml | jmdictdb xml

jmdict 2847495 Deleted (id: 2088750)
最近話題
【さいきんわだい】

1.

[adj-no]
▶ recent (current) hot topic
▶ topic lately on everyone's lips

History:

4.	D 2020-11-25 22:26:50 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
	Comments:	I guess it's just a bit too obvious.
3.	A* 2020-11-21 16:57:54 Robin Scott <...address hidden...>
	Comments:	I wouldn't consider this an expression. You can append 最近 to anything.
2.	A* 2020-11-20 22:07:24 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
	Refs:	最近話題 200676 最近話題の 131812 最近話題に 49969 最近話題になっ 40646
	Comments:	I'm of two minds on this. It is very A+B, but also it's common and a clear gloss for the compound might be useful. Left to me, I'd wave it though but others may not agree.
1.	A* 2020-11-20 12:56:11
	Comments:	最近話題のお店最近話題の「リビング学習」最近話題の5G回線最近話題の太陽光発電と風力発電最近話題の新テーマパーク

View entry in alternate formats: jel | edict | jmdict xml | jmnedict xml | jmdictdb xml

jmdict 2847496 Active (id: 2088466)
当たるも八卦当たらぬも八卦
【あたるもはっけあたらぬもはっけ】

1.

[exp] [proverb]
▶ a prediction may or may not come true
▶ only god knows what will happen

History:

2.	A 2020-11-21 00:39:08 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
	Refs:	GG5: 当たるも八卦当たらぬも八卦． A prediction may or may not come true．｜ There is no saying how a prediction may turn out．｜ Fortune-telling is a hit-or-miss business.
	Diff:	@@ -13,2 +13,2 @@ -<gloss>Only god knows what will happen</gloss> -<gloss>It might happen, or it might not</gloss> +<gloss>a prediction may or may not come true</gloss> +<gloss>only god knows what will happen</gloss>
1.	A* 2020-11-20 22:49:20 Daru <...address hidden...>
	Refs:	https://meaning.jp/posts/2655 https://www.weblio.jp/content/当るも八卦当らぬも八卦

View entry in alternate formats: jel | edict | jmdict xml | jmnedict xml | jmdictdb xml

jmdict 2847497 Rejected (id: 2088481)
転瞬
【てんしゅん】

1.

[n]
▶ blink
▶ in the blink of an eye
▶ extremely short period of time

History:

3.	R 2020-11-21 15:59:35 Robin Scott <...address hidden...>
	Comments:	I agree.
2.	A* 2020-11-21 00:36:45 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
	Refs:	転瞬 469 瞬転 543
	Comments:	転瞬/てんしゅん is already an entry (2846906), and is in several references (as indicated by your link). 瞬転 seems to be an artifact of popular culture. See https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/超人機メタルダー I don't think this is really a mainstream word yet. Best avoided for now, I think.
1.	A* 2020-11-20 23:26:22 Daru <...address hidden...>
	Refs:	https://www.weblio.jp/content/転瞬
	Comments:	Seen it very often as 瞬転しゅんてん with the same meaning, but can't find any good sources to back this other version of the word. https://furigana.info/w/瞬転

View entry in alternate formats: jel | edict | jmdict xml | jmnedict xml | jmdictdb xml

jmnedict 5009872 Active (id: 2230846)
アニマル梯団
【アニマルていだん [spec1] 】

1.

[organization]
▶ Animal Teidan (comedy duo)

History:

4.	A 2023-05-06 06:02:48 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
	Comments:	Adding spec1 -- via bulkupd.py --
	Diff:	@@ -8,0 +9 @@ +<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>
3.	A 2020-11-20 04:22:40 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
	Comments:	Thanks. I'll add "group" to the list for the next update.
2.	A* 2020-11-19 13:19:08 Robin Scott <...address hidden...>
	Comments:	Not seeing anything online. If they don't have an official English name, we probably shouldn't invent our own. I think we need a [group] name type. Also useful for musical groups/bands. They're not really organisations.
	Diff:	@@ -12 +12 @@ -<gloss>Animal Ladder (?) (comedy duo)</gloss> +<gloss>Animal Teidan (comedy duo)</gloss>
1.	A* 2020-11-18 03:04:54 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
	Refs:	https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/アニマル梯団
	Comments:	Any idea what they are called in English (if anything?) Certainly not a "person".
	Diff:	@@ -11,2 +11,2 @@ -<misc>&person;</misc> -<gloss>Animaruteidan</gloss> +<misc>&organization;</misc> +<gloss>Animal Ladder (?) (comedy duo)</gloss>

View entry in alternate formats: jel | edict | jmdict xml | jmnedict xml | jmdictdb xml

jmnedict 5010434 Deleted (id: 2088386)

アメリカン・インターナショナル・グループ

1.

[company]
▶ American International Group

History:

1.	D 2020-11-20 04:38:32 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
	Comments:	Merged.

View entry in alternate formats: jel | edict | jmdict xml | jmnedict xml | jmdictdb xml

jmnedict 5010436 Active (id: 2088385)

アメリカンインターナショナルグループ；アメリカン・インターナショナル・グループ

1.

[company]
▶ American International Group

History:

1.	A 2020-11-20 04:38:16 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
	Comments:	Merging
	Diff:	@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@ +</r_ele> +<r_ele> +<reb>アメリカン・インターナショナル・グループ</reb>

View entry in alternate formats: jel | edict | jmdict xml | jmnedict xml | jmdictdb xml

jmnedict 5074724 Active (id: 2236147)

ベクテル [spec1]

1.

[company]
▶ Bechtel Group, Inc.

History:

2.	A 2023-05-08 23:46:53 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
	Comments:	Adding spec1 -- via bulkupd.py --
	Diff:	@@ -5,0 +6 @@ +<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>
1.	A 2020-11-20 04:36:28 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
	Diff:	@@ -8 +8 @@ -<misc>&unclass;</misc> +<misc>&company;</misc>

View entry in alternate formats: jel | edict | jmdict xml | jmnedict xml | jmdictdb xml

jmnedict 5295583 Deleted (id: 2088388)
黒い９月
【くろいくがつ】

1.

[organization]
▶ Black September (Palestinian extremist group responsible for the massacre of Israeli athletes at the Munich Olympics)

History:

1.	D 2020-11-20 04:40:47 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
	Comments:	Merged.

View entry in alternate formats: jel | edict | jmdict xml | jmnedict xml | jmdictdb xml

jmnedict 5295585 Active (id: 2231810)
黒い九月；黒い９月
【くろいくがつ [spec1] 】

1.

[organization]
▶ Black September (Palestinian extremist group responsible for the massacre of Israeli athletes at the Munich Olympics)

History:

2.	A 2023-05-06 06:05:34 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
	Comments:	Adding spec1 -- via bulkupd.py --
	Diff:	@@ -11,0 +12 @@ +<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>
1.	A 2020-11-20 04:40:30 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
	Comments:	Merge
	Diff:	@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@ +</k_ele> +<k_ele> +<keb>黒い９月</keb>

View entry in alternate formats: jel | edict | jmdict xml | jmnedict xml | jmdictdb xml

jmnedict 5741814 Active (id: 2176603)
三ばか大将
【さんばかたいしょう】

1.

[group]
▶ The Three Stooges (comedy group)

History:

4.	A 2022-01-29 06:26:13 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...>
	Diff:	@@ -11 +11 @@ -<misc>&organization;</misc> +<misc>&group;</misc>
3.	A 2020-11-20 04:37:26 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
	Comments:	We can make this "group" eventually.
	Diff:	@@ -11 +11 @@ -<misc>&unclass;</misc> +<misc>&organization;</misc>
2.	A 2019-01-20 04:50:37 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
	Comments:	Product? Work?
	Diff:	@@ -1,3 +1,2 @@ -<ent_seq>2837879</ent_seq> -<ent_corp>jmdict</ent_corp> +<ent_corp>jmnedict</ent_corp>
1.	A* 2019-01-20 02:26:03

View entry in alternate formats: jel | edict | jmdict xml | jmnedict xml | jmdictdb xml

jmnedict 5742604 Active (id: 2235555)
草は歌っている
【くさはうたっている [spec1] 】

1.

[work]
▶ The Grass Is Singing (novel by Doris Lessing)

History:

3.	A 2023-05-07 06:34:12 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
	Comments:	Adding spec1 -- via bulkupd.py --
	Diff:	@@ -8,0 +9 @@ +<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>
2.	A 2020-11-20 20:24:46 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
	Comments:	Quiet. Closing.
1.	A* 2020-11-03 11:05:56 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
	Refs:	GG5 has 草は歌う, but almost all the WWW hits are for 草は歌っている.

View entry in alternate formats: jel | edict | jmdict xml | jmnedict xml | jmdictdb xml

14.	A 2023-10-01 23:17:49 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...>
	Diff:	@@ -14,0 +15 @@ +<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
13.	A 2020-11-20 04:13:25 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
12.	A* 2020-11-19 23:48:46 Robin Scott <...address hidden...>
	Refs:	daijr: （「で」を伴って）特に恩恵を受けていなくても，漠然とした感謝の気持ちを表す語。ありがたいことに。多く挨拶の語として用いる。「―で無事に帰って参りました」「『御両親は御健在ですか』『はい，―で』」 daijs: 「おかげ」をさらに敬っていう語。「すべて神様の―と感謝する」
	Comments:	I thought "grace of God" more or less covered covered daijr's sense 2 (where you express gratitude for some situation or result that didn't involve someone else's help or efforts), but on reflection, there's nothing inherently religious about "おかげさまで無事に帰って参りました". I'm not sure what the right approach is here. Probably best to drop the おかげさまで x-ref from the "grace (of God)" sense and instead just treat it as an extra-polite form of the equivalent おかげ sense (as in daijs).
	Diff:	@@ -21 +21,13 @@ -<xref type="see" seq="1270220">おかげさまで・1</xref> +<xref type="see" seq="1270220">おかげさまで・2</xref> +<misc>&pol;</misc> +<misc>&uk;</misc> +<s_inf>as おかげさまで</s_inf> +<gloss>(someone's) assistance</gloss> +<gloss>help</gloss> +<gloss>aid</gloss> +<gloss>kindness</gloss> +<gloss>goodwill</gloss> +</sense> +<sense> +<pos>&n;</pos> +<xref type="see" seq="1001640">おかげ・1</xref> @@ -27,11 +38,0 @@ -</sense> -<sense> -<pos>&n;</pos> -<xref type="see" seq="1270220">おかげさまで・2</xref> -<misc>&pol;</misc> -<misc>&uk;</misc> -<gloss>(someone's) assistance</gloss> -<gloss>help</gloss> -<gloss>aid</gloss> -<gloss>kindness</gloss> -<gloss>goodwill</gloss>
11.	A* 2020-11-19 13:29:38 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...>
	Comments:	Should the "grace (of God)" sense really lead? Aren't the relative frequencies of sense 1/2 something like 1/99？Or am I missing something?
10.	A 2020-11-19 02:21:15 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
(show/hide 9 older log entries)
9.	A* 2020-11-19 01:56:45 Robin Scott <...address hidden...>
	Comments:	Probably better as two senses (as in daijr/s). Sense 1 glosses come from the おかげ entry.
	Diff:	@@ -24,0 +25,8 @@ +<gloss>benevolence (of Buddha)</gloss> +<gloss>blessing</gloss> +</sense> +<sense> +<pos>&n;</pos> +<xref type="see" seq="1270220">おかげさまで・2</xref> +<misc>&pol;</misc> +<misc>&uk;</misc>
8.	A* 2020-11-18 09:41:23 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...>
	Comments:	Should grace (of God) really lead? P
7.	A* 2020-11-18 00:10:53 Robin Scott <...address hidden...>
	Refs:	daijr
	Diff:	@@ -20,0 +21,2 @@ +<xref type="see" seq="1270220">おかげさまで</xref> +<xref type="see" seq="1270220">おかげさまで・1</xref> @@ -23,3 +25,6 @@ -<gloss>(somebody's) backing</gloss> -<gloss>assistance</gloss> -<gloss>thanks to (somebody)</gloss> +<gloss>grace (of God)</gloss> +<gloss>(someone's) assistance</gloss> +<gloss>help</gloss> +<gloss>aid</gloss> +<gloss>kindness</gloss> +<gloss>goodwill</gloss>
6.	A 2020-11-16 22:42:03 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
5.	A* 2020-11-16 15:57:44 Chris Vasselli <...address hidden...>
	Refs:	https://www.edrdg.org/~jwb/cgi-bin/ngramlookupwww?sent=お蔭様；お蔭さま；御蔭様;+おかげ様お蔭様 4403 お蔭さま 230 御蔭様 85 おかげ様 2607
	Diff:	@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@ +</k_ele> +<k_ele> +<keb>おかげ様</keb>
4.	A 2015-05-24 05:29:14 Rene Malenfant <...address hidden...>
3.	A* 2015-05-20 15:34:23
	Diff:	@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@ +</k_ele> +<k_ele> +<keb>お蔭さま</keb> @@ -15,0 +19 @@ +<misc>&uk;</misc>
2.	A 2012-04-30 06:25:31 Rene Malenfant <...address hidden...>
	Refs:	koj, daij, meikyo
	Comments:	i'm going to go with [pol] over [hon], as in our entry for おかげさまで
	Diff:	@@ -15,1 +15,1 @@ -<misc>&hon;</misc> +<misc>&pol;</misc>
1.	A* 2012-04-28 16:42:09 Marcus
	Diff:	@@ -15,1 +15,2 @@ -<gloss>(your) backing</gloss> +<misc>&hon;</misc> +<gloss>(somebody's) backing</gloss> @@ -17,0 +18,1 @@ +<gloss>thanks to (somebody)</gloss>

JMdictDB - Japanese Dictionary Database

Entries