gg5, prog, daij, meikyo

Added senses.

@@ -31,0 +32,2 @@
+<gloss>to be fixed</gloss>
+<gloss>to be arranged</gloss>
@@ -36 +38,27 @@
-<gloss>to look good in (clothes)</gloss>
+<s_inf>as 決まっている or 決まった</s_inf>
+<gloss>to be unchanging</gloss>
+<gloss>to be the same (as always)</gloss>
+<gloss>to be fixed</gloss>
+<gloss>to be set</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5r;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<gloss>to be well executed (of a manoeuvrer in a sport, game, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>to go well</gloss>
+<gloss>to succeed</gloss>
+<gloss>to connect (of a punch)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5r;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<gloss>to look good (of clothing)</gloss>
+<gloss>to look sharp</gloss>
+<gloss>to be stylish</gloss>
+<gloss>to suit one</gloss>
+<gloss>to be held in place (of a hairdo)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5r;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<gloss>to be struck and held (of a pose in kabuki)</gloss>

決まる	2216938
キマる	44336

Disussion on 2841446 (決まっている)

@@ -22,0 +23,4 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>キマる</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>
+</r_ele>

daijs

are the tags really correct? [news2,nf28]

@@ -8,0 +8,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>大閤</keb>
@@ -17,1 +20,5 @@
-<gloss>father of the Imperial adviser (advisor)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&hon;</misc>
+<gloss>retired Imperial adviser (advisor)</gloss>

daijr, daijs: https://kotobank.jp/word/ら抜き言葉-656381
nikk: https://kotobank.jp/word/ら抜言葉-2092210

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>'ra'-removed word (i.e. lacking the 'ra' in the 'rareru' verb conjunction)</gloss>
+<gloss>'ra'-removed word (i.e. lacking the 'ra' in potential forms like 'taberareru')</gloss>

Entry created

Changed "designed" to "made".
Better to avoid giving people an idea that the design was changed, when later used on horseback, or that it has features of its design that are better for foot, specifically. It's lighter and more flexible/mobile. Those are benefits, regardless.
The weight and inflexible nature of the ooyoroi was a (much) greater problem on foot, than on horseback, but that is a thing about the ooyoroi, not the doumaru. The doumaru works equally well, on horse and foot.

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>light armour opening at the right, originally designed for use on foot</gloss>
+<gloss>light armour opening at the right, originally made for use on foot</gloss>

It is no less commonly used to refer to a full suit of armour. You cannot ignore that.
To only state the "torso armour" sense, is to implicitly deny the existence of the "full suit" sense.

That the kokugos fail to recognize this, is one of the ways in which their entry is clearly wrong. As I've noted, they also claim that it was only used on foot, which is clearly false.
This is hardly the only example of kokugos getting things objectively and undeniably wrong.
(just as there are some examples of clear and undeniable errors, in many a en-en dictionary, as well. Not to mention jp-en/en-jp dictionaries, which have a large, shocking, amount of errors that are beyond obvious and quite extremely wrong. My go-to example being that practically all en-jp dictionaries translate "hip" as "尻". IIRC there is one, just one, rather minor, en-jp dictionary that doesn't)

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>light torso armour opening at the right, originally designed for foot soldiers</gloss>
+<gloss>light armour opening at the right, originally designed for use on foot</gloss>

The fact that 胴丸 came to be used by other types of soldiers does not change the fact that it was designed for footsoldiers. We can add "originally" to be more precise.
"Torso armour" is a crucial detail. 胴 is in the name. I don't think it's necessary to mention that 胴丸 can also refer to the complete suit of armour. The kokugos don't either.

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>light armour opening at the right</gloss>
+<gloss>light torso armour opening at the right, originally designed for foot soldiers</gloss>

I have extensively explained why having a single sense calling it a torso armour, is wrong
…as well as why claiming that it is for footsoldiers, is wrong in multiple ways.

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>light torso armour opening at the right (designed for foot soldiers)</gloss>
+<gloss>light armour opening at the right</gloss>

I'll merge the competing versions and close it.

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>armour that opens at the right</gloss>
+<gloss>light torso armour opening at the right (designed for foot soldiers)</gloss>

I.e. reverting to a version that gives a false definition.
Okay, so it needs to be short…
Seems my impression of how brief the definitions need to be, wasn't really all that off…

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>light torso armour designed for foot soldiers</gloss>
+<gloss>armour that opens at the right</gloss>

For a term like this a short explanation is best. People can go off to other sources if 
they want more. I'm reverting to Robin's previous version.

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>light armour initially used on foot, but later also from horseback. Opens on the right side</gloss>
+<gloss>light torso armour designed for foot soldiers</gloss>

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>light armour that opens on the right side. Initially used on foot, but later also from horseback</gloss>
+<gloss>light armour initially used on foot, but later also from horseback. Opens on the right side</gloss>

Nothing that contradicts the kokugos?
How about:
jwiki:
"しかし、その後の戦法の変化に伴い、胴丸はしだいに騎乗の上級武士にも用いられるようになり、デザイン的にも上級武士に相応しい華美なものへと発展していく。南北朝時代頃からは、胴丸の武士も兜・大袖を着用することが一般的になった。"
myarmoury:
"During the Mongolian invasions (1274 and 1281) and especially in the next century, the role of the infantry on the battlefield increased dramatically. Many of the poorer and low-ranking samurai preferred to fight on foot. Although the heavy, box-like o-yoroi was modernized to some degree in the 13th century, it remained quite unsuitable for infantry combat. At the same time, the do-maru's comfort, ease in wear and use on the battlefield made it a favoured replacement for the o-yoroi and other types of armour in such combat."
https://www.nihonto.com/a-brief-history-of-japanese-armor/
"The dômaru and haramaki were the first light body armor for infantry.  During the Muromachi era, they came to be used with helmets and shoulder guards in the place of ô-yoroi by military commanders."

I still question the notion of calling it light, but as some sources do refer to it as such, I'll let it slide.
(BTW, anything said of the doumaru, is also true of the haramaki. The only difference being, that the doumaru opens at the right side, and the haramaki at the back. As the ooyoroi died out, it was not quite replaced by the doumaru, but rather by the doumaru and the haramaki)

…and, again, suits of armour including a doumaru "cuirass", are also typically (always?) referred to as doumaru. Hence you cannot specify it as "chest armour", unless you also add an extra sense, of a suit of armour with such a chest armour.

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>light torso armour designed for foot soldiers</gloss>
+<gloss>light armour that opens on the right side. Initially used on foot, but later also from horseback</gloss>

jwiki: "胴丸（どうまる）は、日本の鎧の形式の1つ。平安時代中期頃生じたもので、徒歩戦に適した鎧の形式である。 "
http://myarmoury.com/feature_jpn_armour.html
"At the beginning of this period retainers and servants usually wore simpler armour (do-maru) [...] The warriors who wore do-maru usually walked or ran near the horse of their lord."

That gloss is far too long. I'm not seeing anything in the sources provided that contradicts the kokugo definitions. I think we should drop the mention of samurai altogether to avoid confusion.

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>torso armour that opens at the right side. Initially made for those on foot, but later came to (along with the haramaki) replace the heavier and less mobile ō-yoroi on horseback as well</gloss>
+<gloss>light torso armour designed for foot soldiers</gloss>
@@ -18,5 +17,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<misc>&hist;</misc>
-<gloss>suit or armour, with such a torso armour</gloss>

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>torso armour that opens at the right side. Initially made for those on foot, but later came to replace the heavier and less mobile ō-yoroi on horseback as well</gloss>
+<gloss>torso armour that opens at the right side. Initially made for those on foot, but later came to (along with the haramaki) replace the heavier and less mobile ō-yoroi on horseback as well</gloss>

Ah, so the policy is like that? That's more to my liking, actually.
I made it so simple and brief, due to my (apparently a bit mistaken) impression of how JMdict is.
Okay, a bit more explanatory, then.

Not sure if it's best to says "torso armour", and then add a second sense, or if it's better to just say "armour", but…

>All the kokugos describe it as light/comfortable/simple armour designed for foot soldiers.

…and all the other sources I mention, make it clear that the kokugos are wrong.
Certainly, this isn't an encyclopedia and it needs to be shorter. This does not excuse making it clearly wrong, however, nor does it mean that the kokugos are, or possibly could be, more reliable than the other sources I mentioned, in terms of what a doumaru is.

BTW, I find it very weird, that English language sources like add a hyphen, in the name. (this is merely a comment on the practice)

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>light torso armour designed for foot soldiers and later worn by samurai</gloss>
+<gloss>torso armour that opens at the right side. Initially made for those on foot, but later came to replace the heavier and less mobile ō-yoroi on horseback as well</gloss>
@@ -17,0 +18,5 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&hist;</misc>
+<gloss>suit or armour, with such a torso armour</gloss>

Editorial Policy extracts: (https://www.edrdg.org/wiki/index.php/Editorial_policy)
- "provide useful explanations where appropriate. "type of card game" is not very useful - in such a case explain briefly what the card game entails",

daijr/s, koj, nikk, shinmeikai

All the kokugos describe it as light/comfortable/simple armour designed for foot soldiers. This isn't an encyclopedia so we can't mention everything but we need to include the key details.
"Dō-maru" is common in English-language sources so I've added it as a gloss.
Please do not delete the exiting gloss unless you wish to improve upon it. "A type of armour" is not a helpful translation.

@@ -16 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>type of armour</gloss>
+<gloss>light torso armour designed for foot soldiers and later worn by samurai</gloss>
+<gloss>dō-maru</gloss>

What's the basis for the description as "light"? It is lighter than the ooyoroi, certainly, but that says more about the ooyoroi. (which was, as I've explained, later replaced by the doumaru, with no one using the relatively heavy and inflexible oyoroi, anymore. Though, to be fair to the oyoroi, it was used for several centuries)

As for "chest armour":
As per the 丸, it wraps around the torso/胴 (with, as previously mentioned, an opening at the right side), thus covering the sides and back as well …and has bits that drape down all the way to the thighs.

So it doesn't just cover the chest, but also the sides and back, as well as abdomen and upper thighs. The term "cuirass" does at least mean an armour that covers both the front and back of the chest-area (but not the things that drape down, to protect further down), and is hence decently okay as a description/translation, but "chest armour" is far too inaccurate and misleading.

Also, "used primarily by foot soldiers and later by samurai" is quite wrong, on two counts.
"primarily by" is wrong, unless ones adds a "at first" or "initially" before it
…and, as I said, footsoldiers implies (outright means?) common soldiers, but some samurai also fought on foot. Though as the sentence later states "…and later by samurai", it's far more than an implication.

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>light chest armour used primarily by foot soldiers and later by samurai</gloss>
+<gloss>type of armour</gloss>

Looks good to me.

daijr

I'd go with this.

@@ -16,6 +16 @@
-<gloss>A type of Japanese cuirass.</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<misc>&hist;</misc>
-<gloss>suit of armour, with such a cuirass</gloss>
+<gloss>light chest armour used primarily by foot soldiers and later by samurai</gloss>

http://myarmoury.com/feature_jpn_armour.html (though it doesn't explicitly state that it was used on horseback)
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/胴丸
https://www.nihonto.com/a-brief-history-of-japanese-armor/

Whilst doumaru were, initially, used by retainers/ashigaru, they were later used by samurai, as well.
Initially poorer samurai and/or ones that fought on foot, but was later also used by rich and/or horse-riding samurai as well, replacing the ooyoroi (which they had used before)

What is sometimes called a cuirass, does also include what one might call faulds, which drape down over the lower parts, all the way down to the thighs. Hence "cuirass" is not an entirely accurate description …but it's close enough, I suppose.

@@ -16 +16,6 @@
-<gloss>simple cuirass worn by footsoldiers</gloss>
+<gloss>A type of Japanese cuirass.</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&hist;</misc>
+<gloss>suit of armour, with such a cuirass</gloss>

Daijisen

@@ -15 +15,2 @@
-<gloss>A type of Japanese armour.</gloss>
+<misc>&hist;</misc>
+<gloss>simple cuirass worn by footsoldiers</gloss>

"Medieval" refers to a European time period. It is sometimes used for a somewhat analogous period in Japanese history, but… such use either needs clarification, or clear context. (one might argue that the latter is true, here, but… I wouldn't fully agree)
Also, "lacking a solid breastplate and sleeves" is not a distinguishing feature of the doumaru, as that is true of almost all Japanese armours.

Either this needs a far more thorough description, that refers to it's actual distinguishing features (that it wraps around the person, with an opening at the right side, being the most notable) …or just note that it's a Japanese armour, and let people look it up in an encyclopedia and/or a more armour/militaria dedicated resource.

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<gloss>medieval armour lacking a solid breastplate and sleeves</gloss>
+<gloss>A type of Japanese armour.</gloss>

wiki

@@ -15,1 +15,1 @@
-<gloss>medieval armor</gloss>
+<gloss>medieval armour lacking a solid breastplate and sleeves</gloss>

koj

"I don't think" isn't and argument or clarification.
You say it isn't an improvement, but don't explain how or why it isn't.
Also, "infantry" is pretty much the same as "foot soldier", including the same problems.

As for "torso armour"… Yes, certainly, it is clearer, though I'd argue that if the term "armour" is used, without mention of what part your talking about, people will tend to assume that it is either torso armour, or a full suit of armour, which would be fine, here.
But okay.
"Torso armour" it is
…but then it needs to explicitly state the second sense.
(this makes this entry, inconsistent with the other armour entries, BTW)

@@ -16 +16,7 @@
-<gloss>light torso armour opening at the right, originally designed for infantry combat</gloss>
+<gloss>light torso armour opening at the right, originally used for combat on foot</gloss>
+<gloss>dō-maru</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&hist;</misc>
+<gloss>suit of armour, using such a torso armour</gloss>

I don't think those changes improve the gloss.
I'm not yielding on the "torso" point. Dropping it makes the gloss less precise and harder to visualise.

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>light armour opening at the right, originally made for use on foot</gloss>
+<gloss>light torso armour opening at the right, originally designed for infantry combat</gloss>

Changed "designed" to "made".
Better to avoid giving people an idea that the design was changed, when later used on horseback, or that it has features of its design that are better for foot, specifically. It's lighter and more flexible/mobile. Those are benefits, regardless.
The weight and inflexible nature of the ooyoroi was a (much) greater problem on foot, than on horseback, but that is a thing about the ooyoroi, not the doumaru. The doumaru works equally well, on horse and foot.

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>light armour opening at the right, originally designed for use on foot</gloss>
+<gloss>light armour opening at the right, originally made for use on foot</gloss>

It is no less commonly used to refer to a full suit of armour. You cannot ignore that.
To only state the "torso armour" sense, is to implicitly deny the existence of the "full suit" sense.

That the kokugos fail to recognize this, is one of the ways in which their entry is clearly wrong. As I've noted, they also claim that it was only used on foot, which is clearly false.
This is hardly the only example of kokugos getting things objectively and undeniably wrong.
(just as there are some examples of clear and undeniable errors, in many a en-en dictionary, as well. Not to mention jp-en/en-jp dictionaries, which have a large, shocking, amount of errors that are beyond obvious and quite extremely wrong. My go-to example being that practically all en-jp dictionaries translate "hip" as "尻". IIRC there is one, just one, rather minor, en-jp dictionary that doesn't)

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>light torso armour opening at the right, originally designed for foot soldiers</gloss>
+<gloss>light armour opening at the right, originally designed for use on foot</gloss>

The fact that 胴丸 came to be used by other types of soldiers does not change the fact that it was designed for footsoldiers. We can add "originally" to be more precise.
"Torso armour" is a crucial detail. 胴 is in the name. I don't think it's necessary to mention that 胴丸 can also refer to the complete suit of armour. The kokugos don't either.

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>light armour opening at the right</gloss>
+<gloss>light torso armour opening at the right, originally designed for foot soldiers</gloss>

I have extensively explained why having a single sense calling it a torso armour, is wrong
…as well as why claiming that it is for footsoldiers, is wrong in multiple ways.

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>light torso armour opening at the right (designed for foot soldiers)</gloss>
+<gloss>light armour opening at the right</gloss>

I'll merge the competing versions and close it.

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>armour that opens at the right</gloss>
+<gloss>light torso armour opening at the right (designed for foot soldiers)</gloss>

I.e. reverting to a version that gives a false definition.
Okay, so it needs to be short…
Seems my impression of how brief the definitions need to be, wasn't really all that off…

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>light torso armour designed for foot soldiers</gloss>
+<gloss>armour that opens at the right</gloss>

For a term like this a short explanation is best. People can go off to other sources if 
they want more. I'm reverting to Robin's previous version.

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>light armour initially used on foot, but later also from horseback. Opens on the right side</gloss>
+<gloss>light torso armour designed for foot soldiers</gloss>

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>light armour that opens on the right side. Initially used on foot, but later also from horseback</gloss>
+<gloss>light armour initially used on foot, but later also from horseback. Opens on the right side</gloss>

Nothing that contradicts the kokugos?
How about:
jwiki:
"しかし、その後の戦法の変化に伴い、胴丸はしだいに騎乗の上級武士にも用いられるようになり、デザイン的にも上級武士に相応しい華美なものへと発展していく。南北朝時代頃からは、胴丸の武士も兜・大袖を着用することが一般的になった。"
myarmoury:
"During the Mongolian invasions (1274 and 1281) and especially in the next century, the role of the infantry on the battlefield increased dramatically. Many of the poorer and low-ranking samurai preferred to fight on foot. Although the heavy, box-like o-yoroi was modernized to some degree in the 13th century, it remained quite unsuitable for infantry combat. At the same time, the do-maru's comfort, ease in wear and use on the battlefield made it a favoured replacement for the o-yoroi and other types of armour in such combat."
https://www.nihonto.com/a-brief-history-of-japanese-armor/
"The dômaru and haramaki were the first light body armor for infantry.  During the Muromachi era, they came to be used with helmets and shoulder guards in the place of ô-yoroi by military commanders."

I still question the notion of calling it light, but as some sources do refer to it as such, I'll let it slide.
(BTW, anything said of the doumaru, is also true of the haramaki. The only difference being, that the doumaru opens at the right side, and the haramaki at the back. As the ooyoroi died out, it was not quite replaced by the doumaru, but rather by the doumaru and the haramaki)

…and, again, suits of armour including a doumaru "cuirass", are also typically (always?) referred to as doumaru. Hence you cannot specify it as "chest armour", unless you also add an extra sense, of a suit of armour with such a chest armour.

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>light torso armour designed for foot soldiers</gloss>
+<gloss>light armour that opens on the right side. Initially used on foot, but later also from horseback</gloss>

jwiki: "胴丸（どうまる）は、日本の鎧の形式の1つ。平安時代中期頃生じたもので、徒歩戦に適した鎧の形式である。 "
http://myarmoury.com/feature_jpn_armour.html
"At the beginning of this period retainers and servants usually wore simpler armour (do-maru) [...] The warriors who wore do-maru usually walked or ran near the horse of their lord."

That gloss is far too long. I'm not seeing anything in the sources provided that contradicts the kokugo definitions. I think we should drop the mention of samurai altogether to avoid confusion.

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>torso armour that opens at the right side. Initially made for those on foot, but later came to (along with the haramaki) replace the heavier and less mobile ō-yoroi on horseback as well</gloss>
+<gloss>light torso armour designed for foot soldiers</gloss>
@@ -18,5 +17,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<misc>&hist;</misc>
-<gloss>suit or armour, with such a torso armour</gloss>

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>torso armour that opens at the right side. Initially made for those on foot, but later came to replace the heavier and less mobile ō-yoroi on horseback as well</gloss>
+<gloss>torso armour that opens at the right side. Initially made for those on foot, but later came to (along with the haramaki) replace the heavier and less mobile ō-yoroi on horseback as well</gloss>

Ah, so the policy is like that? That's more to my liking, actually.
I made it so simple and brief, due to my (apparently a bit mistaken) impression of how JMdict is.
Okay, a bit more explanatory, then.

Not sure if it's best to says "torso armour", and then add a second sense, or if it's better to just say "armour", but…

>All the kokugos describe it as light/comfortable/simple armour designed for foot soldiers.

…and all the other sources I mention, make it clear that the kokugos are wrong.
Certainly, this isn't an encyclopedia and it needs to be shorter. This does not excuse making it clearly wrong, however, nor does it mean that the kokugos are, or possibly could be, more reliable than the other sources I mentioned, in terms of what a doumaru is.

BTW, I find it very weird, that English language sources like add a hyphen, in the name. (this is merely a comment on the practice)

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>light torso armour designed for foot soldiers and later worn by samurai</gloss>
+<gloss>torso armour that opens at the right side. Initially made for those on foot, but later came to replace the heavier and less mobile ō-yoroi on horseback as well</gloss>
@@ -17,0 +18,5 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&hist;</misc>
+<gloss>suit or armour, with such a torso armour</gloss>

Editorial Policy extracts: (https://www.edrdg.org/wiki/index.php/Editorial_policy)
- "provide useful explanations where appropriate. "type of card game" is not very useful - in such a case explain briefly what the card game entails",

daijr/s, koj, nikk, shinmeikai

All the kokugos describe it as light/comfortable/simple armour designed for foot soldiers. This isn't an encyclopedia so we can't mention everything but we need to include the key details.
"Dō-maru" is common in English-language sources so I've added it as a gloss.
Please do not delete the exiting gloss unless you wish to improve upon it. "A type of armour" is not a helpful translation.

@@ -16 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>type of armour</gloss>
+<gloss>light torso armour designed for foot soldiers and later worn by samurai</gloss>
+<gloss>dō-maru</gloss>

What's the basis for the description as "light"? It is lighter than the ooyoroi, certainly, but that says more about the ooyoroi. (which was, as I've explained, later replaced by the doumaru, with no one using the relatively heavy and inflexible oyoroi, anymore. Though, to be fair to the oyoroi, it was used for several centuries)

As for "chest armour":
As per the 丸, it wraps around the torso/胴 (with, as previously mentioned, an opening at the right side), thus covering the sides and back as well …and has bits that drape down all the way to the thighs.

So it doesn't just cover the chest, but also the sides and back, as well as abdomen and upper thighs. The term "cuirass" does at least mean an armour that covers both the front and back of the chest-area (but not the things that drape down, to protect further down), and is hence decently okay as a description/translation, but "chest armour" is far too inaccurate and misleading.

Also, "used primarily by foot soldiers and later by samurai" is quite wrong, on two counts.
"primarily by" is wrong, unless ones adds a "at first" or "initially" before it
…and, as I said, footsoldiers implies (outright means?) common soldiers, but some samurai also fought on foot. Though as the sentence later states "…and later by samurai", it's far more than an implication.

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>light chest armour used primarily by foot soldiers and later by samurai</gloss>
+<gloss>type of armour</gloss>

Looks good to me.

daijr

I'd go with this.

@@ -16,6 +16 @@
-<gloss>A type of Japanese cuirass.</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<misc>&hist;</misc>
-<gloss>suit of armour, with such a cuirass</gloss>
+<gloss>light chest armour used primarily by foot soldiers and later by samurai</gloss>

http://myarmoury.com/feature_jpn_armour.html (though it doesn't explicitly state that it was used on horseback)
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/胴丸
https://www.nihonto.com/a-brief-history-of-japanese-armor/

Whilst doumaru were, initially, used by retainers/ashigaru, they were later used by samurai, as well.
Initially poorer samurai and/or ones that fought on foot, but was later also used by rich and/or horse-riding samurai as well, replacing the ooyoroi (which they had used before)

What is sometimes called a cuirass, does also include what one might call faulds, which drape down over the lower parts, all the way down to the thighs. Hence "cuirass" is not an entirely accurate description …but it's close enough, I suppose.

@@ -16 +16,6 @@
-<gloss>simple cuirass worn by footsoldiers</gloss>
+<gloss>A type of Japanese cuirass.</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&hist;</misc>
+<gloss>suit of armour, with such a cuirass</gloss>

Daijisen

@@ -15 +15,2 @@
-<gloss>A type of Japanese armour.</gloss>
+<misc>&hist;</misc>
+<gloss>simple cuirass worn by footsoldiers</gloss>

"Medieval" refers to a European time period. It is sometimes used for a somewhat analogous period in Japanese history, but… such use either needs clarification, or clear context. (one might argue that the latter is true, here, but… I wouldn't fully agree)
Also, "lacking a solid breastplate and sleeves" is not a distinguishing feature of the doumaru, as that is true of almost all Japanese armours.

Either this needs a far more thorough description, that refers to it's actual distinguishing features (that it wraps around the person, with an opening at the right side, being the most notable) …or just note that it's a Japanese armour, and let people look it up in an encyclopedia and/or a more armour/militaria dedicated resource.

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<gloss>medieval armour lacking a solid breastplate and sleeves</gloss>
+<gloss>A type of Japanese armour.</gloss>

wiki

@@ -15,1 +15,1 @@
-<gloss>medieval armor</gloss>
+<gloss>medieval armour lacking a solid breastplate and sleeves</gloss>

koj

旧車會	4348
旧車会	11289

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>旧車会</keb>
+</k_ele>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/旧車會

Just a biker group that resembles 暴走族 in certain ways.

@@ -12,2 +12 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1519490">暴走族</xref>
-<gloss>bōsōzoku using classic motorbikes</gloss>
+<gloss>biker group in which members ride customized classic motorcycles</gloss>

Are they really bōsōzoku? Or just a type of biker group?

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>biker club using classic motorbikes</gloss>
+<gloss>bōsōzoku using classic motorbikes</gloss>

Daijr

Simpler

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>delinquent biker club composed of bikers who cherish classic motorcycles</gloss>
+<gloss>biker club using classic motorbikes</gloss>

wiki google images (e.g. https://i1.wp.com/kinzoupro.com/wp-content/uploads/1fa2da66a3040f30dd79b01b73a36427-01.jpg)

not the same as  旧車会

@@ -8 +8,4 @@
-<reb>まーらーあじマーラーウェイ</reb>
+<reb>マーラーあじ</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>マーラーウェイ</reb>
@@ -11,0 +15 @@
+<field>&food;</field>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/麻辣味
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mala_sauce

maff article on farm management, section on egg packing and conveyance.  Uses the construction （バーコンベヤーと呼ばれている搬送帯)
https://www.maff.go.jp/j/syouan/douei/tori/pdf/060928_hpai_kyumei_3.pdf
農場側の鶏卵の出荷に関するリスクを考えると、鶏舎からの集卵の方法は、農場によって様々な方法があるが、大別すると、①コンベヤー集卵（バーコンベヤーと呼ばれている搬送帯で鶏舎から集卵室等に自動で鶏卵を集める方法）、

This is a バーコンベヤー (bar conveyor). notably, no belts:
https://www.nakamatic.co.jp/chicken/2018/11/post-6.html

Wikipedia for ベルトコンベア, *uses* 搬送 in the description, but nowhere offers 搬送帯 as a synonym
カーブした部分でもテーパローラやカーフベルトを用いて製品を搬送可能である。
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/ベルトコンベア


はんそう‐たい【搬送帯】 -> コンベヤー
https://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/word/搬送帯/#jn-181523

コンベヤー.  Note, there *is* a reverse reference to 搬送帯, strengthening the idea that this dictionary believes a 搬送帯 could be any kind of mechanical conveyance mechanism.
《「コンベヤ」「コンベアー」とも》物を連続的に一定の距離だけ運搬する自動装置。ベルトコンベヤー・チェーンコンベヤーなどがある。搬送帯。
https://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/word/コンベヤー/#jn-84082

ベルト‐コンベヤー【belt conveyor】 の解説 (doesn't include 搬送帯 either, for that matter).  
ベルト車にベルトを輪状に掛けて回転させ、その上に物品をのせて連続的に運搬する装置。土砂・石炭の運搬、組立工場の部品移動に用いる。ベルトコンベアー。
https://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/word/ベルトコンベヤー/#jn-199932

"Carrier Band" usage of 搬送帯 in isolation
画像処理システム、画像処理方法及び画像処理プログラム
撮像対象物を上面に搭載して搬送する網目状の搬送帯と、前記搬送帯の上方に配置され、前記撮像対象物が含まれる撮像範囲全体を様々な方向のベクトル...
https://plidb.inpit.go.jp/db/new/lr201113.html
Google translate:
Image processing system, image processing method and image processing program
A mesh-like *****carrier band***** for carrying an object to be imaged mounted on its upper surface, and a vector in various directions that is arranged above the carrier band and covers the entire imaging range including the object to be imaged.

Studying 搬.
I was originally going to offer a "see:ベルトコンベア" as a cross reference, given that ベルトコンベア is super common, and this entry is super-rare.  But looking into it further, I don't see much evidence that "搬送帯", if it is even common enough to be considered a word, would translate to "conveyor belt" in the first place.  Like 干鰯, convey + belt = "conveyor belt" seems like a no-brainer, but if you look at the reference that justified this entry in the first place, the only definition given is a forward reference to "コンベヤー", and the definition of that doesn't inherently use a belt at all.  Yes, ベルトコンベヤー is one option example in the definition of コンベヤー, but so is チェーンコンベヤ, and why then does the definition of 搬送帯 not link to that entry?  

For n-grams, I'll note that there appears to be an  (somewhat uncommon) collocation 搬送帯域 used in electronics, which decomposes as 搬送 + 帯域.  Google translate gives "carrier band" for this. I even have a reference without 域 (first reference) that appears to be 搬送帯="carrier band" based on surrounding context (and google translate).

In a google search for "搬送帯", the first results are dictionary entries, and a few overly-dense patent-application-looking entries (including one that is absolutely littered with 搬送帯) and technical documents (such as the reference from maff). 

Google image search seems to find mainly one device from one specific company that is anything close to a "conveyor belt". (EC-23C)

While I don't think I can deny that at least a couple of Japanese people have used 搬送帯 as a formulation of "a device for transporting objects by means of a belt", it looks like "conveyor belt" was imported into Japanese as gairaigo, and has never been anything else.  The likelihood that someone will encounter "搬送帯" in the wild and need this dictionary to interpret it seems very low.  On balance I think this entry just does more harm than good by suggesting that this could even be considered as a "native" translation of "conveyor belt", and I also don't think it's common (or well-defined) enough to try and flesh out a better definition, so I'm suggesting it be dropped.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>conveyer belt</gloss>
+<gloss>conveyor belt</gloss>

Koj, GG5

Henshall entry for 搬 (1716) example word (pg. 547)

https://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/word/搬送帯/#jn-181523