其方	32437
そちら	4498433
そっち	2806562

@@ -6 +6 @@
-<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

@@ -25 +24,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1483185">あちら・1</xref>

wisdom, daijs
https://kotobank.jp/word/其方-554547

aligning

@@ -32 +32,3 @@
-<gloss>that way (direction distant from the speaker, close to the listener)</gloss>
+<s_inf>direction distant from the speaker, close to the listener</s_inf>
+<gloss>that way</gloss>
+<gloss>that direction</gloss>
@@ -37 +39,2 @@
-<gloss>there (place distant from the speaker, close to the listener)</gloss>
+<s_inf>place distant from the speaker, close to the listener</s_inf>
+<gloss>there</gloss>
@@ -42 +45,2 @@
-<gloss>that one (something close to the listener)</gloss>
+<s_inf>something close to the listener</s_inf>
+<gloss>that (one)</gloss>
@@ -46,0 +51 @@
+<s_inf>そちら is polite</s_inf>
@@ -54 +59,2 @@
-<gloss>that person (someone close to the listener)</gloss>
+<s_inf>someone close to the listener</s_inf>
+<gloss>that person</gloss>

@@ -31,0 +32 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -35,0 +37 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -39,0 +42 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -45,0 +49 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

@@ -24,3 +24,3 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1189360">何方・どちら・1</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1004500">此方・こちら・1</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1483185">彼方・あちら・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1004500">こちら・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1483185">あちら・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1189360">どちら・1</xref>

花札を初めてやる人の本 (1997) p. 133
トランプ・花札・ダイス (1968) p. 159-182 "何役ができ
たが下げます" is given as the "call" to go on
(it appears in plenty more books, I can provide 
more quotes if needed)

https://ja.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/八�
%AB
"自分の順番で札の取れたことの確定した時点で獲得した札に
よって役が成立していれば、競技を継続するかしないかを決め
なければならない。競技を継続する場合は「下げる」と言って
ゲームを続ける。"
as opposed to ”あがる" (to win), I suppose.

@@ -42,0 +43,7 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2826488">出来役</xref>
+<field>&hanaf;</field>
+<gloss>to keep on playing after one has formed a scoring combination with captured cards</gloss>
+</sense>

@@ -41,1 +41,1 @@
-<gloss>to remove (food etc. from table or altar)</gloss>
+<gloss>to remove (food, etc. from table or altar)</gloss>

Daijr has 提げる here, but I prefer it split out.
GG5, ルミナス, 新和英中辞典

GG5 has many senses which all seem the same to me. The other refs are more combining.

@@ -20,0 +20,6 @@
+<gloss>to suspend</gloss>
+<gloss>to wear (e.g. decoration)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
@@ -21,0 +27,7 @@
+<gloss>to reduce</gloss>
+<gloss>to bring down</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>to demote</gloss>
@@ -22,3 +35,1 @@
-<gloss>to wear</gloss>
-<gloss>to dismiss</gloss>
-<gloss>to grant</gloss>
+<gloss>to pull back</gloss>

Odd

Mdmd

My id chang

花札を初めてやる人の本 (1997) p. 133
トランプ・花札・ダイス (1968) p. 159-182 "何役ができ
たが下げます" is given as the "call" to go on
(it appears in plenty more books, I can provide 
more quotes if needed)

https://ja.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/八�
%AB
"自分の順番で札の取れたことの確定した時点で獲得した札に
よって役が成立していれば、競技を継続するかしないかを決め
なければならない。競技を継続する場合は「下げる」と言って
ゲームを続ける。"
as opposed to ”あがる" (to win), I suppose.

@@ -42,0 +43,7 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2826488">出来役</xref>
+<field>&hanaf;</field>
+<gloss>to keep on playing after one has formed a scoring combination with captured cards</gloss>
+</sense>

@@ -41,1 +41,1 @@
-<gloss>to remove (food etc. from table or altar)</gloss>
+<gloss>to remove (food, etc. from table or altar)</gloss>

いずかた and いずち are tagged as 雅 in smk. I think they should be separate [poet] entries. I'll set it up.
I don't think we should ever use sk for ok readings like this. They're not variant forms; they're separate archaic words. I think they can be dropped. I think ok reading that we want to keep should be separate arch-tagged entries.

@@ -15,18 +14,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>いずかた</reb>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>いずち</reb>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>どち</reb>
-<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>いずし</reb>
-<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>なにざま</reb>
-<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>

何方	127545
孰方	0
どちら	18952856
いず方	186
いずかた	467

The [ichi1] can come off the 何方 form - it's not in the IchiMan source document.
孰方 gets 0 n-grams and is not in references - I think it can be dropped.
For いずかた, GG5 has a separate entry and uses いず方 in examples with the 《文》 tag.  Perhaps it should go in its own [rare][form[ entry.
Although they're in the kokugos, I think the rare "ok]" readings can be hidden.

@@ -7,5 +6,0 @@
-<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>孰方</keb>
-<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -42 +42,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1483185">あちら・1</xref>

While I am not a fan of "Latin name" without any qualification, as Robin pointed out it is used informally. I think it should stay as it was.

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<gloss>(what is often wrongly called) Latin name</gloss>
+<gloss>Latin name</gloss>

Marcus Richert proved himself unwilling to acknowledge or apologise for, what he did wrong.
That is not a person/attitude, that is suitable for any collaboration, or any discussion, of any kind. While it is good that he at least acknowledged that he was unsuited to try to discuss this matter, the refusal to acknowledge or apologise, shows a degree of arrogance and disrespect, that should not be accepted.
Even in a forum that tolerates rudeness/insults. (and much less one that does)

…with that said, none of his actions indicate anything about me, nor have I done anything to warrant leaving.
So…

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<gloss>Latin name</gloss>
+<gloss>(what is often wrongly called) Latin name</gloss>

>The question "is Alan really correct when he says the Latin name formally only refers to the species name?", is deeply wrong, as I 
have never said anything like that.

Apologies if you feel I misrepresented you, but I don't think my interpretation of what you said was particularly unreasonable :

>A animal's/plant's "Latin name", is the common name it has, in Latin.
>Take wolves, for example:
>English name: Wolf.
>Japanese name: 狼.
>Latin name: Lupus.
>Scientific name: Canis lupus. (whilst this example includes the Latin name, that is not always the case)"

>It took me quite a while, to decipher what that was intended to mean. I've never quite learned how to properly use commas, and 
really need to, but I'm not nearly as bad as you.

Alan, this tone isn't at all appropriate on a collaborative project made up of volunteers. If you think something I posted seemed 
odd, feel free to ask for a clarification. 

>How is perfectly correct language use, not logical?

I said "such logic", in reference to your argument for it being incorrect. Language has a logic, of course, but logical arguments 
trying to prove that clearly established language use is somehow "wrong" has little to do with this. 

(I'm approving this to shorten the queue, but I expect the argument will continue)

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<gloss>(what is often wrongly called) Latin name</gloss>
+<gloss>Latin name</gloss>

The question "is Alan really correct when he says the Latin name formally only refers to the species name?", is deeply wrong, as I have never said anything like that.
Quite the opposite.

The only formal terms are scientific name and binomial name. (scientific name is broader, as it isn't limited to just the name of species. It can refer to various clades, like Carnivora [which contains, e.g., cats, dogs, and bears], or sub-species, like Canis lupus familiaris, which has three parts, rather than two)

Also, scientific names being either Latin or, quite often, Latinized, is explanation for why people call it Latin name, but not a justification or validation of it.
A species' English name, is the common name in English.
A species' Japanese name, is the common name in Japanese.
…and on the same note, its Latin name is its common name in Latin.
The scientific name, however, is a completely different matter.

Also, "Latin name" is not formal. Though I wouldn't call it informal, exactly. (it is, but…)
Colloquial is more accurate.
Also, and primarily, it is clearly wrong.

"logic and perfectly correct language use tend to have very little in common, in my experience."

It took me quite a while, to decipher what that was intended to mean. I've never quite learned how to properly use commas, and really need to, but I'm not nearly as bad as you.
And even after I deciphered what it is saying, it still makes no sense.
How is perfectly correct language use, not logical?

…and "/…/by means of two Latin names/…/", is describing that the names used to form the binomial nomenclature, are in Latin.
That is very different from the notion, of referring to the binomial name, as the species' "Latin name".

Though I do agree, when you say "I don't think it's very clear what "informal" here means, 
and it could be misinterpreted as if it applied to 学名 itself."
That is quite true.

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<gloss>Latin name (informal)</gloss>
+<gloss>(what is often wrongly called) Latin name</gloss>

Also, is Alan really correct when he says the Latin name formally only refers to the species name? Enwiki's "Latin name" is just a redirect to 
"Binominal name". (in the text itself, it's stated it's "more informally [...] also called a Latin name.")
I don't agree with the argument that it's "unequivocally wrong" because the first part of the name might not be actually derived from Latin. Such 
logic and perfectly correct language use tend to have very little in common, in my experience.
I really don't think there's any risk for confusion here.


Collins: "binomial nomenclature or binominal nomenclature
n (Biology) a system for naming plants and animals by means of two Latin names ..."

https://www.britannica.com/science/Pelagophycus
"Elk kelp was given the Latin name Laminaria porra in 1822 by French botanist Dominique Sébastien Léman."

(how "informal" is it really if it's used in encyclopedic entries?)

Currently, JMdict does not explain or comment on English usage. We're not going to make an exception for this entry.
The editors consider this matter settled.

My argument has never been that it isn't used. "(what is often wrongly called)", is a clear statement that it IS used.
The fact that it is used, is not an argument against explaining that said usage is wrong. That makes no sense.

While I am not a fan of "Latin name" without any qualification, as Robin pointed out it is used informally. I think it should stay as it was.

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<gloss>(what is often wrongly called) Latin name</gloss>
+<gloss>Latin name</gloss>

Marcus Richert proved himself unwilling to acknowledge or apologise for, what he did wrong.
That is not a person/attitude, that is suitable for any collaboration, or any discussion, of any kind. While it is good that he at least acknowledged that he was unsuited to try to discuss this matter, the refusal to acknowledge or apologise, shows a degree of arrogance and disrespect, that should not be accepted.
Even in a forum that tolerates rudeness/insults. (and much less one that does)

…with that said, none of his actions indicate anything about me, nor have I done anything to warrant leaving.
So…

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<gloss>Latin name</gloss>
+<gloss>(what is often wrongly called) Latin name</gloss>

>The question "is Alan really correct when he says the Latin name formally only refers to the species name?", is deeply wrong, as I 
have never said anything like that.

Apologies if you feel I misrepresented you, but I don't think my interpretation of what you said was particularly unreasonable :

>A animal's/plant's "Latin name", is the common name it has, in Latin.
>Take wolves, for example:
>English name: Wolf.
>Japanese name: 狼.
>Latin name: Lupus.
>Scientific name: Canis lupus. (whilst this example includes the Latin name, that is not always the case)"

>It took me quite a while, to decipher what that was intended to mean. I've never quite learned how to properly use commas, and 
really need to, but I'm not nearly as bad as you.

Alan, this tone isn't at all appropriate on a collaborative project made up of volunteers. If you think something I posted seemed 
odd, feel free to ask for a clarification. 

>How is perfectly correct language use, not logical?

I said "such logic", in reference to your argument for it being incorrect. Language has a logic, of course, but logical arguments 
trying to prove that clearly established language use is somehow "wrong" has little to do with this. 

(I'm approving this to shorten the queue, but I expect the argument will continue)

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<gloss>(what is often wrongly called) Latin name</gloss>
+<gloss>Latin name</gloss>

Should have looked at this earlier.

@@ -19 +19 @@
-<gloss>to costar</gloss>
+<gloss>to co-star</gloss>

chuujiten; meikyo; daijs

Please align 「顔合わせる」.

@@ -15,0 +16,12 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
+<gloss>to costar</gloss>
+<gloss>to appear together</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
+<gloss>to be matched</gloss>
+<gloss>to face against</gloss>
+</sense>

@@ -11,0 +11,1 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos>

mk (single sense)

@@ -16,0 +17,2 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -22,0 +25,2 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

daijr, shinmeikai, gg5

Added sense.

@@ -19,0 +20,5 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<gloss>competition between theatres putting on the same show</gloss>
+</sense>

gg5

More general.

@@ -17 +17,2 @@
-<gloss>recital contest</gloss>
+<gloss>contest (between performers)</gloss>
+<gloss>competitive performance</gloss>

Looks ok.

I think it's worth mentioning Perry at least. How about this?
Regarding [id] on sense 2, I don't think it's necessary given that this sense is just a figurative use of sense 1. It's not really what I'd consider an idiom.

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">Western ships which came to Japan between the 16th and 19th centuries</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">Western ships that came to Japan between the 16th and 19th centuries, esp. those of the Perry Expedition in 1853</gloss>

Isn't the fact that they brought about the 
opening of Japan worth mentioning?

Daijs and nikk btw all have a separate sense 
for "esp. the black ships of the Perry 
Expedition"

I think it was a bit encyclopedic I sugest a rather major pruning.

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">Western ships, often painted with tar, that came to Japan between the 16th and 18th centuries, esp. those of the Perry Expedition (1853) that led to the opening of Japan</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">Western ships which came to Japan between the 16th and 19th centuries</gloss>

daijs

Too wordy?

@@ -16 +16,3 @@
-<gloss>black ships (i.e. Western ships, often painted with tar, that came to Japan in the 16th century)</gloss>
+<misc>&hist;</misc>
+<gloss>black ships</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">Western ships, often painted with tar, that came to Japan between the 16th and 18th centuries, esp. those of the Perry Expedition (1853) that led to the opening of Japan</gloss>

gg5

@@ -12 +12,4 @@
-<gloss>head of the secretariat</gloss>
+<gloss>secretary-general</gloss>
+<gloss>director-general</gloss>
+<gloss>executive director</gloss>
+<gloss>executive secretary</gloss>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -16,0 +17,2 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

chujiten, prog

@@ -17 +16,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -19 +18 @@
-<gloss>supporting role</gloss>
+<gloss>playing a supporting role</gloss>

gg5; meikyo

@@ -18 +18,2 @@
-<gloss>co-star</gloss>
+<gloss>supporting performance</gloss>
+<gloss>supporting role</gloss>

chuujiten

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>co-star</gloss>
+<gloss>supporting actor</gloss>
+<gloss>supporting actress</gloss>

Fork

I don't think this id an improvement

Learn Japanese New College Text Volume II ©1984 John Young and Kimiko Nakajima-Okano, Chapter 14, Note 14.4.1, page 286.

Bringing the correspondence pairs in line with each other.

@@ -14 +14,2 @@
-<s_inf>at the beginning of a brief letter</s_inf>
+<xref type="see" seq="1596410">草々・2</xref>
+<s_inf>letters beginning with this typically end with 草々</s_inf>

gg5, daijr

@@ -14,2 +14,2 @@
-<s_inf>opening formula of a brief letter</s_inf>
-<gloss>skipping the pleasantries...</gloss>
+<s_inf>at the beginning of a brief letter</s_inf>
+<gloss>dispensing with the preliminaries ...</gloss>
@@ -20 +20,2 @@
-<gloss>omitting the beginning</gloss>
+<s_inf>when quoting something</s_inf>
+<gloss>omitting the previous part</gloss>

Fork - sorry, I edited an earlier version.

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<s_inf>letters beginning with this typically end with 草々</s_inf>
+<s_inf>brief letters beginning with this typically end with 草々</s_inf>

Learn Japanese New College Text Volume II ©1984 John Young and Kimiko Nakajima-Okano, Chapter 14, Note 14.4.1, page 286.

Bringing the correspondence pairs in line with each other.

@@ -14 +14,2 @@
-<s_inf>at the beginning of a brief letter</s_inf>
+<xref type="see" seq="1596410">草々・2</xref>
+<s_inf>letters beginning with this typically end with 草々</s_inf>

gg5, daijr

@@ -14,2 +14,2 @@
-<s_inf>opening formula of a brief letter</s_inf>
-<gloss>skipping the pleasantries...</gloss>
+<s_inf>at the beginning of a brief letter</s_inf>
+<gloss>dispensing with the preliminaries ...</gloss>
@@ -20 +20,2 @@
-<gloss>omitting the beginning</gloss>
+<s_inf>when quoting something</s_inf>
+<gloss>omitting the previous part</gloss>

meikyo

@@ -19,0 +20 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

Noted, but I don't think it added materially to this entry, whereas the notes in the 拝啓 and 敬具 entries did.

I was trying to bring this pair (戦略、早々) in line with the other correspondence pair (拝啓、敬具) which are currently and I think beneficially linked.
So if it’s not an improvement for the brief letter, why is it an improvement that adds value for the formal letter?
As in the case of 拝啓 & 敬具, 前略 & 早々 are always paired in an appropriately but quickly written letter.

I prefered it as it was before, which I think was more appropriate as a dictionary entry.

@@ -14,3 +14 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1596410">草々・2</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1596410">草々・2</xref>
-<s_inf>letters beginning with this typically end with 草々</s_inf>
+<s_inf>at the beginning of a brief letter</s_inf>

Learn Japanese New College Text Volume II ©1984 John Young and Kimiko Nakajima-Okano, Chapter 14, Note 14.4.1, page 286.

Bringing the correspondence pairs in line with each other.

@@ -14 +14,2 @@
-<s_inf>at the beginning of a brief letter</s_inf>
+<xref type="see" seq="1596410">草々・2</xref>
+<s_inf>letters beginning with this typically end with 草々</s_inf>

@@ -33,0 +34 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2669790">東西東西</xref>

@@ -33,2 +33 @@
-<pos>&exp;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="2669790">東西東西</xref>
+<pos>&int;</pos>
@@ -37,2 +36,2 @@
-<gloss>Ladies and Gentlemen!</gloss>
-<gloss>Your attention, please!</gloss>
+<gloss>ladies and gentlemen!</gloss>
+<gloss>your attention, please!</gloss>

nikk

@@ -16,0 +16,4 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ひがしにし</reb>
+<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>
@@ -28,0 +32,1 @@
+<stagr>とうざい</stagr>

@@ -24,5 +24,0 @@
-<gloss>whole country</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

Koj has a 同じ車 sense. Daijr and daijs only have sense 1.

Not sure it's really two senses.

@@ -13,0 +14,4 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>same car</gloss>

gg5, prog, daijr

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>taking the same car or train</gloss>
+<gloss>riding in the same car</gloss>

https://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q13157528598

二封	1380

Not in the usual refs.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&baseb;</field>

I think this is the fork...

Found refs suggesting that it's not restricted to あちら, never mind

@@ -43 +42,0 @@
-<stagr>あちら</stagr>
@@ -46 +45 @@
-<s_inf>someone physically distant from both speaker and listener, or someone not present but known by both speaker and listener</s_inf>
+<s_inf>someone physically distant from both speaker and listener, or someone not present but known by both speaker and listener. あちら is polite</s_inf>

wisdom, daijs

aligning.
only あちら can be used for a third person, same as with こちら. described in daijs

@@ -30 +30,2 @@
-<gloss>that way (direction distant from both speaker and listener)</gloss>
+<s_inf>direction distant from both speaker and listener</s_inf>
+<gloss>that way</gloss>
@@ -37,2 +38,9 @@
-<gloss>that one (something physically distant from both speaker and listener, or something not visible but known by both speaker and listener)</gloss>
-<gloss>that</gloss>
+<s_inf>something physically distant from both speaker and listener, or something not visible but known by both speaker and listener</s_inf>
+<gloss>that (one)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<stagr>あちら</stagr>
+<pos>&pn;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<s_inf>someone physically distant from both speaker and listener, or someone not present but known by both speaker and listener</s_inf>
+<gloss>that person</gloss>
@@ -43,7 +51,2 @@
-<s_inf>あちら is polite</s_inf>
-<gloss>that person (someone physically distant from both speaker and listener, or someone not present but known by both speaker and listener)</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&pn;</pos>
-<misc>&uk;</misc>
-<gloss>there (place distant from both speaker and listener)</gloss>
+<s_inf>place distant from both speaker and listener</s_inf>
+<gloss>there</gloss>

@@ -26,3 +26,3 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1189360">何方・どちら・1</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1004500">此方・こちら・1</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1006780">其方・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1004500">こちら・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1006780">そちら・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1189360">どちら・1</xref>
@@ -35,0 +36 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -40,0 +42 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -45,0 +48 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

https://hinative.com/ja/questions/10393
Q:彼方の読み方はいくつがありますか？
A:かなた
だけだと思います。
A:確かに3つありますね！知らなかった。笑
彼方と書いてあったら、かなたと読む方が多いと思います。
A: かなた、と読むイメージしかなかったです

@@ -6,3 +6 @@
-<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>
-<ke_pri>news2</ke_pri>
-<ke_pri>nf28</ke_pri>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

Here goes....

Bringing changes over from fork. Apologies for all the edits.

@@ -45 +44,0 @@
-<stagr>あちら</stagr>
@@ -48 +47 @@
-<s_inf>someone physically distant from both speaker and listener, or someone not present but known by both speaker and listener</s_inf>
+<s_inf>someone physically distant from both speaker and listener, or someone not present but known by both speaker and listener. あちら is polite</s_inf>

@@ -32,0 +33 @@
+<gloss>that direction</gloss>

wisdom, daijs

aligning.
only あちら can be used for a third person, same as with こちら. described in daijs

@@ -30 +30,2 @@
-<gloss>that way (direction distant from both speaker and listener)</gloss>
+<s_inf>direction distant from both speaker and listener</s_inf>
+<gloss>that way</gloss>
@@ -37,2 +38,9 @@
-<gloss>that one (something physically distant from both speaker and listener, or something not visible but known by both speaker and listener)</gloss>
-<gloss>that</gloss>
+<s_inf>something physically distant from both speaker and listener, or something not visible but known by both speaker and listener</s_inf>
+<gloss>that (one)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<stagr>あちら</stagr>
+<pos>&pn;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<s_inf>someone physically distant from both speaker and listener, or someone not present but known by both speaker and listener</s_inf>
+<gloss>that person</gloss>
@@ -43,7 +51,2 @@
-<s_inf>あちら is polite</s_inf>
-<gloss>that person (someone physically distant from both speaker and listener, or someone not present but known by both speaker and listener)</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&pn;</pos>
-<misc>&uk;</misc>
-<gloss>there (place distant from both speaker and listener)</gloss>
+<s_inf>place distant from both speaker and listener</s_inf>
+<gloss>there</gloss>

prog; gg5; meikyo; daijs

@@ -22,0 +23,12 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<gloss>costarring</gloss>
+<gloss>appearing together</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<gloss>being matched</gloss>
+<gloss>facing off</gloss>
+</sense>

gg5

@@ -14,2 +14,4 @@
-<gloss>attention (care) required</gloss>
-<gloss>needs special attention</gloss>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<gloss>need for caution</gloss>
+<gloss>need for care</gloss>
+<gloss>requiring special attention</gloss>

I think this is slightly clearer.

@@ -16,2 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>to read out and compare (e.g. draft document)</gloss>
-<gloss>to check (e.g. accounts)</gloss>
+<gloss>to read out and compare (e.g. proofs against a manuscript)</gloss>
+<gloss>to check (accounts, etc.) by reading aloud</gloss>

Daijr (1) 原稿と校正刷，下書きと清書したものなどを，ひとりが読み上げ，他の人が聞いて誤りを訂正する。
GG5: read out and collate 《one copy with another》; read out 「in [for] collation; verify; 〔表などを〕 check.
中辞典: read out and collate 《one copy》 《with another》; check 《accounts》
ルミナス: 	(照らし合わせる) collate
Cambridge ALD: (collate) - to collect and arrange in correct order the sheets of a document:

All the JEs use "collate" but that term is not usually used in modern English for this sort of action, and I think it is best avoided.

@@ -16 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>to read out and compare or collate</gloss>
+<gloss>to read out and compare (e.g. draft document)</gloss>
+<gloss>to check (e.g. accounts)</gloss>

daijr/s, meikyo
開巻	3431
開巻し	55
開巻する	22

Not vs in the refs.

@@ -12 +12,4 @@
-<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<gloss>opening a book</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>

gg5

@@ -15,2 +15,3 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2106210">熊送り</xref>
-<gloss>Ainu bear festival</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2106220">イオマンテ</xref>
+<gloss>Ainu bear-sacrifice festival</gloss>
+<gloss>Iomante</gloss>

koj, daij

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>熊祭</keb>
@@ -12,1 +15,2 @@
-<gloss>(Ainu) Bear Festival</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2106210">熊送り</xref>
+<gloss>Ainu bear festival</gloss>

koj
G n-grams: 129

@@ -11,3 +11,3 @@
-<pos>&n-adv;</pos>
-<gloss>at the very beginning of a book</gloss>
-<gloss>the book opens with ...</gloss>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&obsc;</misc>
+<gloss>very beginning of a book</gloss>

yoji? not idiomatic as far as I can tell.

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<misc>&yoji;</misc>
@@ -14 +13 @@
-<gloss>The book opens with ...</gloss>
+<gloss>the book opens with ...</gloss>

Kanji Haitani list

Adding yoji tagAdding yoji tag
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<misc>&yoji;</misc>

Entry created

gg5, meikyo, daij

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -12,3 +13,3 @@
-<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<gloss>extremely hot (spicy)</gloss>
+<misc>&col;</misc>
+<gloss>extremely spicy</gloss>
+<gloss>fiery hot</gloss>
@@ -16,0 +18 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -18,3 +20,3 @@
-<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<gloss>very strict evaluation</gloss>
+<misc>&col;</misc>
+<gloss>extremely harsh (criticism, review, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>scathing</gloss>

Entry created

The grammar book says one should consult with 
a dictionary to check if specific compound 
adjectives are always hyphenated or not, which 
implies to me that we shouldn't use hyphens 
here.

https://www.grammarbook.com/punctuation/hyphens.asp
https://apastyle.apa.org/learn/faqs/when-use-hyphen

From my understanding, "it is dirt cheap" but "a dirt-cheap book".
adj-i implies both uses are OK, of course, but my impression is free-standing compound 
adjectives in jmdict are usually hyphenated.

https://www.lexico.com/definition/dirt_cheap
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/dirt cheap
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/dirt-cheap

@@ -13,2 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>dirt-cheap</gloss>
-<gloss>super-cheap</gloss>
+<gloss>dirt cheap</gloss>
+<gloss>super cheap</gloss>

@@ -13,2 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>dirt cheap</gloss>
-<gloss>super cheap</gloss>
+<gloss>dirt-cheap</gloss>
+<gloss>super-cheap</gloss>

reverso examples

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -12 +12,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -14 +14,2 @@
-<gloss>bargain priced</gloss>
+<gloss>super cheap</gloss>
+<gloss>bargain-priced</gloss>

Aligning.

@@ -16 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>banned from access (from a web forum, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>ban (from accessing a website, network service, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>blocking access</gloss>

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>banned from access (e.g. from a web forum, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>banned from access (from a web forum, etc.)</gloss>

Entry created

I don't think the x-ref is necessary.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2257830">強弱アクセント</xref>
+<field>&ling;</field>

Entry created

X-ref was removed from 高低アクセント.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2257820">高低アクセント</xref>
+<field>&ling;</field>

Entry created

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<field>&ling;</field>

Entry created

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<field>&ling;</field>

Entry created

Yes, I agree.

Provided there's a combination of low n-grams and A+B. Otherwise it should be flagged for discussion.

There's so much questionable stuff with the 
comp tag that I think it'd be OK to self-
approve deletions of it.

G n-grams: 39

Entry created

I think this is clear and general enough.

I don't think "operation" is correct.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>non-store operation, i.e. operating from home, hotel, etc.</gloss>
+<gloss>non-store type (retailing, business, etc.)</gloss>

If it's an incomplete list, shouldn't i.e. be 
replaced with e.g.?

Could be a rented room. I think the "etc." should stay.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>non-store operation, i.e. operating from home, hotel</gloss>
+<gloss>non-store operation, i.e. operating from home, hotel, etc.</gloss>

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>non-store operation, i.e. operating from home, hotel, etc.</gloss>
+<gloss>non-store operation, i.e. operating from home, hotel</gloss>

I don't think they hurt.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-store_retailing

I don't think the examples are necessary.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>non-store retailing (e.g. Internet, mail-order, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>non-store retailing</gloss>

Entry created

Duplicate.

https://ejje.weblio.jp/content/どうか

See comment in entry 2089480, suggesting that that entry take over the どうかした reading.

@@ -4,3 +3,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>どうかした</reb>
-</r_ele>

Entry created

Duplicate.

https://ejje.weblio.jp/content/どうか

See comment in entry 2089480, suggesting that that entry take over the どうかした reading.

@@ -4,3 +3,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>どうかした</reb>
-</r_ele>

Entry created

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<gloss>activities leading to marriage, e.g. dating, courtship</gloss>
+<gloss>activities leading to marriage (e.g. dating, courtship)</gloss>

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<gloss>activities leading to marriage, e.g. dating, courtship, etc.</gloss>
+<gloss>activities leading to marriage, e.g. dating, courtship</gloss>

Entry created

@@ -20,0 +21 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

@@ -26 +26 @@
-<gloss>activities leading to marriage, e.g. dating, courtship</gloss>
+<gloss>activities leading to marriage (e.g. dating, courtship)</gloss>

@@ -26 +26 @@
-<gloss>activities leading to marriage, e.g. dating, courtship, etc.</gloss>
+<gloss>activities leading to marriage, e.g. dating, courtship</gloss>

OK.

@@ -19,0 +20 @@
+<pos>&vs;</pos>

I don't think we need the x-ref in this direction.

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2229140">アク禁</xref>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/アクセス禁止

It's a noun.

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -14 +14,2 @@
-<gloss>banned from access (from a web forum, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>ban (from accessing a website, network service, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>blocking access</gloss>

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<gloss>banned from access (e.g. from a web forum, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>banned from access (from a web forum, etc.)</gloss>

Entry created

Aligning w Robin's edit to 前略

@@ -11,3 +11,3 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<s_inf>opening formula of a brief letter</s_inf>
-<gloss>forgive me for dispensing with the preliminaries, but I hasten to inform you that...</gloss>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<s_inf>at the beginning of a brief letter</s_inf>
+<gloss>dispensing with the preliminaries ...</gloss>

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>Forgive me for dispensing with the preliminaries, but I hasten to inform you that...</gloss>
+<gloss>forgive me for dispensing with the preliminaries, but I hasten to inform you that...</gloss>

daijr

copied from 前略

* daijr; daijs & nikk (https://kotobank.jp/word/東西東西-580246)
* daijs: ［感］

Originates in sumo wrestling.

@@ -9,0 +10,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>とざいとうざい</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -11 +14 @@
-<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<pos>&int;</pos>
@@ -12,0 +16 @@
+<gloss>your attention, please!</gloss>

So does Daijr. My mistake.

daijisen has it as と_う_ざいとうざい

@@ -8,1 +8,1 @@
-<reb>とざいとうざい</reb>
+<reb>とうざいとうざい</reb>

can also attach to nouns, 激太り	28701
激痩せ	33801

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<s_inf>before the root of an i-adjective</s_inf>
+<s_inf>before the root of an i-adjective or a noun</s_inf>

daijr

Helpful to have examples here.

@@ -12 +12,3 @@
-<s_inf>before the root of an -i adjective</s_inf>
+<xref type="see" seq="2068400">激辛・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2179110">激安</xref>
+<s_inf>before the root of an i-adjective</s_inf>

GG5

I agree. Not needed.

@@ -13,0 +14,2 @@
+<gloss>terrifically</gloss>
+<gloss>super</gloss>

I think it's more slang than colloquial. None of the kokugos have it. Not nearly as common as 激安.

@@ -12,4 +12,4 @@
-<xref type="ant" seq="2179110">激安・げきやす</xref>
-<xref type="ant" seq="2179110">激安・げきやす</xref>
-<misc>&col;</misc>
-<gloss>very expensive</gloss>
+<xref type="ant" seq="2179110">激安</xref>
+<xref type="ant" seq="2179110">激安</xref>
+<misc>&sl;</misc>
+<gloss>extremely expensive</gloss>

I can see examples of 激高い and 激安い being used, esp. the latter.

http://ameblo.jp/ishikawads/entry-11571348904.html
http://d.hatena.ne.jp/dlit/20130618/1371559741
"形容詞に付加：激高（だか）、激寒（さむ）、激まず"

Quiet. I'll close it now.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technical_debt

The A+B is far from obvious. Not exclusively an IT term, but that's where it's usually used. Not common.

@@ -12 +12,4 @@
-<gloss>Technical debt. Technical burden caused by postponing improvements to software or technical systems.</gloss>
+<field>&comp;</field>
+<gloss>technical debt (implied cost of additional rework caused by choosing an initial limited solution)</gloss>
+<gloss>design debt</gloss>
+<gloss>code debt</gloss>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/技術的負債
https://ssaits.jp/promapedia/jargon/technical-debt.html

I think affected is fine.

is this supposed to be affected or afflicted?

reverso
G n-grams: 10997

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>person affected by disease</gloss>
+<gloss>person affected by a disease</gloss>
+<gloss>sufferer</gloss>

https://www.weblio.jp/content/罹患者
https://biz.trans-suite.jp/40326#i-5

seems to be used in connection with Covid recently

Eijiro, GG5 examples, Reverso
最初で最後	292959	  
最初で最後の	179137	  
最初で最後に	16841

@@ -12,2 +12,3 @@
-<gloss>the first and the last time</gloss>
-<gloss>the only time</gloss>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<gloss>first and last (time, chance, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>(the) only</gloss>

大辞泉

https://www3.nhk.or.jp/news/html/20201105/k10012696391000.html
(just noting this was on the 2020 ことしの新語 list)

I think this works.

@@ -12,3 +12,5 @@
-<gloss>comprehensive</gloss>
-<gloss>with a holistic view</gloss>
-<gloss>with a broad persective</gloss>
+<gloss>panoramic (view, perspective, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>high-level</gloss>
+<gloss>comprehensive (manner)</gloss>
+<gloss>holistic</gloss>
+<gloss>broad</gloss>

実用
俯瞰的	18729

eij
～を俯瞰的に捉える
see ~ from a higher perspective [point of 
view, viewpoint]
～を総合的かつ俯瞰的に展望する
take a comprehensive, panoramic view of

reverso examples

heard Suga use in Diet debate.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alcantara_(material)
G n-grams: 15254

@@ -9 +9,2 @@
-<gloss>Alcantara</gloss>
+<field>&tradem;</field>
+<gloss>Alcantara (material)</gloss>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/アルカンターラ_(素材)

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>reading through and comparing (e.g. draft document)</gloss>
+<gloss>reading out and comparing (e.g. proofs against a manuscript)</gloss>

GG5: collation by reading out.
中辞典: checking 《against the original》; collation  (台本の読み合わせをする read through a script together.)
ルミナス: 	(読み合わせて校合(きょうごう)すること) collation [U]; 〔劇〕 read-through

See comments on 1688260. I think "collation" is best avoided.

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss>collation</gloss>
+<gloss>reading through and comparing (e.g. draft document)</gloss>

luminous; prog

読み合わせ	44093
読み合せ	878

gg5, jwiki

gg5, prog

aparthotel 482277
apartotel 15310
RP

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<gloss>apartotel</gloss>

アパートホテル	2593

eij

gg5, koj