gg5

@@ -14 +14,3 @@
-<gloss>second hand bookstore (bookshop)</gloss>
+<gloss>secondhand bookshop</gloss>
+<gloss>secondhand bookstore</gloss>
+<gloss>secondhand bookseller</gloss>

G n-grams 4563003

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -8,0 +10 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

Style alignment.

@@ -27 +27 @@
-<gloss>daimyō</gloss>
+<gloss>daimyo</gloss>

OK as is.

or arch?

@@ -24 +24 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1415080">大名</xref>
+<misc>&hist;</misc>

OK. I'm happy to leave this how it is now.

@@ -26 +26 @@
-<gloss>daimyo</gloss>
+<gloss>daimyō</gloss>

daij nikk

I'm going to reopen this. There's a big difference between being a 1) nobleman - a person part of the nobility who in most cases held 
little power, and 2) being a "powerful Japanese feudal lord" who "ruled most of Japan from their vast, hereditary land holdings" (enwiki). 
The meaning is different enough to qualify splitting in both Japanese and English. If the two meanings in English look too similar, that 
can be handled by making them more different

This isn't some obscure little historical issue but the word is used with both meanings today. If somebody looked up the use of "tonosama" 
in hyakunin isshu decks (for one example of contemporary use of the word in the Heian sense meaning) and walked away with the 
understanding that the "tonosama" cards of those decks depict "powerful feudal lords", then we've done them a disservice.

@@ -15,0 +16,7 @@
+<misc>&hon;</misc>
+<gloss>nobleman</gloss>
+<gloss>dignitary</gloss>
+<gloss>lord</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -18,5 +25 @@
-<gloss>lord</gloss>
-<gloss>nobleman</gloss>
-<gloss>dignitary</gloss>
-<gloss>master</gloss>
-<gloss>feudal lord</gloss>
+<gloss>feudal lord (of the Edo period)</gloss>

Looks ok.

Daijr, GG5, etc.

From the JEs it appears that みことのり is the most common reading, and from Daijirin it is 
also a reading of 勅. As this will move in the work queue, I'll approve and reopen.

@@ -3,0 +4,4 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>詔</keb>
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
+</k_ele>
@@ -11,4 +14,0 @@
-<keb>詔</keb>
-<ke_pri>spec2</ke_pri>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
@@ -16,0 +17,4 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>みことのり</reb>
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>
+</r_ele>
@@ -23,6 +26,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>みことのり</reb>
-<re_restr>詔</re_restr>
-<re_restr>御言宣</re_restr>
-<re_pri>spec2</re_pri>

https://kotobank.jp/word/詔-78792
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/詔

@@ -13,0 +14,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>御言宣</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -22,0 +26,2 @@
+<re_restr>詔</re_restr>
+<re_restr>御言宣</re_restr>
@@ -23,0 +29,4 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>しょう</reb>
+<re_restr>詔</re_restr>

Aligning.

@@ -22 +22 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1000730">行けない・2</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1000730">行けない・4</xref>
@@ -29 +29 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1000730">行けない・3</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1000730">行けない・2</xref>

Not sure it's needed.

@@ -35 +35 @@
-<gloss>cannot go</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="lit">cannot go</gloss>

Literal sense

@@ -32,0 +33,4 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<gloss>cannot go</gloss>
+</sense>

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>

Romanization seems to be common in English-language research.

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>taijin kyofusho</gloss>

From Daijirin it appears the primary meaning of かいじん is sense 2. I'm proposing it go in a 
separate entry.

@@ -16,4 +15,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>かいじん</reb>
-<re_restr>海人</re_restr>
-</r_ele>

digital daijisen https://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/word/海人_(かいじん)/

@@ -15,0 +16,4 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>かいじん</reb>
+<re_restr>海人</re_restr>
+</r_ele>

koj, daij

@@ -21,1 +21,1 @@
-<gloss>male diver</gloss>
+<gloss>male diver (who collects shells, seaweed, etc.)</gloss>

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phenylketonuria

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>PKU</gloss>

@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@
+<field>&med;</field>

I think this is just amplifying sense 1 a little, and is covered by the note. The DBJG mentions "emphasize his point emotionally" (p 327).

@@ -20,4 +19,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&exp;</pos>
-<gloss>talking about something emotively</gloss>

dictionary of basic japanese grammar

seems good to at least mention this second meaning?

@@ -19,0 +20,4 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<gloss>talking about something emotively</gloss>

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<s_inf>の and ん add emphasis; ～です forms are more polite</s_inf>
+<s_inf>の and ん add emphasis</s_inf>

のです	184806448
のだ	70948448
んです	176707857
んだ	151359170

I guess so. We split なのです and なのだ. I'll do that now.
I like keeping the terms in the indices complete as it helps identify modifications to the sentences themselves. Around 50-70 sentences get changed each week and I have software that tracks and identifies the changes. The completeness of the indices is central to this.

@@ -9 +9 @@
-<reb>のだ</reb>
+<reb>んです</reb>
@@ -11,6 +10,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>んです</reb>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>んだ</reb>

I still think it'd be better off split. Do these two really need to be linked to hundreds of example sentences? Shouldn't a few each be 
enough?

Re: "It doesn't seem likely that such children would be given the "name" 帰米. Maybe they were *referred to* using terms 
like 帰米日系人 and 帰米二世." (Richard)

http://www.discovernikkei.org/ja/journal/2017/10/27/japan-boy/
日系アメリカ人の中で、「帰米」（きべい）と呼ばれる人たちがいる。出生地はアメリカなのだが、幼少期に日本で教育を受けて、ふたたびアメリカ
にもどってきた人たちのことだ。日本に一度戻ってからまたアメリカ（米国）に帰ってくるから帰米というのだろう。帰米が人間そのものを指す場合
のほか、形容詞的に帰米二世というように使われる場合もある。

(just a note.)

https://kotobank.jp/word/二世問題-1573714
また、第二次世界大戦前に同国に生まれ、日本で学校教育を受けて帰国した日系二世を表す英語の呼称はKibei（帰米）である。

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kibei

'returning to america' should be stated

@@ -17 +17,3 @@
-<gloss>Japanese-American children (nisei) who were sent by their parents to Japan before WW2 to receive schooling</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1462550">二世・にせい・1</xref>
+<gloss>kibei</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">Japanese-American children (nisei) born prior to WWII who were sent to Japan for schooling before returning to America</gloss>

This is a dictionary, not an encyclopedia, so the understanding that this is a "term" (that is used to refer to something) shouldn't have to 
be explicitly stated.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>return to the United States</gloss>
+<gloss>returning to the United States</gloss>
@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss>term used to refer to Japanese-American children (nisei) who were sent by their parents to Japan before WW2 to receive their schooling</gloss>
+<gloss>Japanese-American children (nisei) who were sent by their parents to Japan before WW2 to receive schooling</gloss>

gg5
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/古書店

They're not necessarily rare.

@@ -11,0 +12,3 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1266170">古本屋</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1266170">古本屋</xref>
+<gloss>secondhand bookshop</gloss>
@@ -13 +15,0 @@
-<gloss>store for rare and old books</gloss>

Entry created

ritsuryo conversion
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<gloss>gate guard (during the ritsuryo system)</gloss>
+<gloss>gate guard (during the ritsuryō system)</gloss>
@@ -20 +20 @@
-<gloss>young forced labour (ritsuryo system)</gloss>
+<gloss>young forced labour (ritsuryō system)</gloss>

typo

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<gloss>gate guard (during the the ritsuryo system)</gloss>
+<gloss>gate guard (during the ritsuryo system)</gloss>

GG5: a guard; a guardsman; a yeoman of the guard.

simplified

@@ -15 +15,2 @@
-<gloss>soldiers of the ritsuryo system that guarded gates of the imperial palace, the court, etc.</gloss>
+<gloss>gate guard (during the the ritsuryo system)</gloss>
+<gloss>gate guardian</gloss>
@@ -19,5 +20 @@
-<gloss>term used in error to refer to young men that were made to do forced labour in the ritsuryo system</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>guards originally stationed at the grand shrine at Ise and shrine at Atsuta, Nagoya to protect the officials there</gloss>
+<gloss>young forced labour (ritsuryo system)</gloss>

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&med;</field>

Entry created

I guess I agree.

i agree.  i can't think of many/any other adv+noun combos in the dictionary

https://www.google.com/search?q="激しく同意"&tbm=nws

I'm not sure this needs to be an entry. It's commonly used with する, which makes it a regular A+B construction, and our second sense of 激しい is "extreme; intense; fierce; strong".
Judging by recent usage, it's just colloquial, not slang.
Also, the gloss "strong agreement" suggests that it's a noun phrase, but without する it's an exclamation ("I strongly agree!"); with する it means "to strongly agree".
Given the 激しい and 同意 entries, I don't think this is especially useful.

As worded it wasn't a noun gloss.

@@ -14,1 +14,1 @@
-<gloss>I strongly agree</gloss>
+<gloss>strong agreement</gloss>

hatena
4 mil hits
http://d.hatena.ne.jp/keyword/�㤷��Ʊ��
http://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q12116
78367

worth having since it's an odd/unusual/jocular construction

daij, koj

The refs don't give this a PoS so I think we should go with exp.

@@ -11,2 +11 @@
-<pos>&adv;</pos>
-<pos>&conj;</pos>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>

Daijr, GG5, etc.

Most xref to 何しろ, so I'll align it with that.

@@ -11,1 +11,6 @@
-<pos>&pref;</pos>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
+<pos>&conj;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1188330">何しろ・なにしろ</xref>
+<gloss>at any rate</gloss>
+<gloss>anyhow</gloss>
+<gloss>anyway</gloss>
@@ -13,2 +18,1 @@
-<gloss>either way</gloss>
-<gloss>regardless of what happens/happened</gloss>
+<gloss>because</gloss>

http://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/leaf/jn2/165589/m0u/な�%8
2%93%E3%81%AB%E3%81%9B%E3%82%88/

Sankoku has this expression with a comma.

https://github.com/JMdictProject/JMdictIssues/issues/122
Adding commas to readings to align with kanji forms.

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>聞くも涙語るも涙</keb>
+<keb>聞くも涙、語るも涙</keb>
@@ -8 +8,2 @@
-<keb>聞くも涙、語るも涙</keb>
+<keb>聞くも涙語るも涙</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -11 +12 @@
-<reb>きくもなみだかたるもなみだ</reb>
+<reb>きくもなみだ、かたるもなみだ</reb>

gg5: "聞くも涙語るも涙の物語　a story that reduces both the listener and the teller to tears"

It appears to be mostly adj-no.
Often written with a comma.

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>聞くも涙、語るも涙</keb>
@@ -11,0 +15 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

https://www.weblio.jp/content/聞くも涙語るも涙の物語
https://ejje.weblio.jp/content/語るも涙
https://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q1453516709

I don't have a problem with well-attested rkb terms being included. I think the dictionary 
is broad enough to include even the more isolated "dialects". A couple of comments:
- this is not an i-adjective. I've made it adj-f for want of anything more appropriate.
- I know the source just referred to 3 adjectives, but xrefs need to be more focused than 
that.

@@ -11,2 +11 @@
-<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="1467720">熱い</xref>
+<pos>&adj-f;</pos>
@@ -17,2 +16 @@
-<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="1343460">暑い</xref>
+<pos>&adj-f;</pos>
@@ -26,2 +24 @@
-<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="1275320">厚い</xref>
+<pos>&adj-f;</pos>

https://twitter.com/search?f=tweets&vertical=default&q=アチサン

Evidence of usage in Japanese

https://hougen.ajima.jp/e29

No need for the literal translation of 頂きます.

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1410800">頂きます</xref>
@@ -15 +13,0 @@
-<gloss>I receive (this meal)</gloss>

https://twitter.com/search?f=tweets&q="くわっちーさびら"&src=typd

Usage

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>クワッチーサビラ</reb>

https://meaning-book.com/blog/20190422164111.html

https://hougen.ajima.jp/e253

565 ngrams

this has been sitting for a couple of weeks, so i'm going to re-close.

i agree with Robin, but AFAIK we don't really have any standard for including/excluding.  it's a matter for the mailing list, perhaps.  if we decide to exclude them, it'll be easy enough to round up the ones we don't want.

I'm not opposed to adding Okinawan terms (including this one) but I think that as a matter of good practice, links to online dialect dictionaries should be supported by evidence of usage (e.g. n-gram counts).
沖縄方言 differs from most other 方言 in that it is not mutually intelligible with standard Japanese. Linguists consider it a separate language.
Of course, the main language spoken in Okinawa today is Japanese, not Okinawan, so we really only want to consider the Okinawan terms that have been adopted by Japanese speakers in Okinawa.

I don't have a problem including these.

https://twitter.com/search?f=tweets&q="ガチマヤー"&src=typd

I don't think mainland speakers need to know these expressions. They're part of regional dialects, and precisely because of that it's unlikely they'll be well-known. If we held that as a standard, I'm sure a considerable part of 方言 in jmdict would need to go too.

沖縄方言 is really a separate language so I think we need evidence that these words are known to and used by mainland speakers if we're to include them.

Aligning.

@@ -21,0 +22,2 @@
+<gloss>establishment</gloss>
+<gloss>restaurant</gloss>

お店	89580069	100.0%
御店	15309	0.0%

Most if not all qualify anyway.

I think we should probably institute a policy of making all 御- forms sK (with exceptions for when those forms are proprtionally very common)

@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

Probably worth doing.

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -11,0 +13 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

Probably worth including a frequency tag, especially to set it apart from おたな

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/デイビッド・ニックターン
https://masa-yoga.com/live/1103/
https://twitter.com/search?f=tweets&vertical=default&q="瞑想家"

Not in the references I could check but seems to be effectively used, and worth recording

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

I wouldn't have tradesman first as its meaning is broad.

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<gloss>merchant house employee</gloss>
@@ -16 +16,0 @@
-<gloss>merchant house employee</gloss>

daijirin etc https://kotobank.jp/word/御店者-452829
斎藤和英大辞典 https://ejje.weblio.jp/content/お店者

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guqin

@@ -9,0 +10,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>クーチン</reb>
+</r_ele>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/古琴

Mypedia has this as a synonym for 琴, but that doesn't seem correct https://kotobank.jp/word/古琴-834893

@@ -15,6 +14,0 @@
-<re_restr>綾戻し</re_restr>
-<re_restr>あや戻し</re_restr>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>アヤもどし</reb>
-<re_restr>アヤ戻し</re_restr>

GG5

@@ -9,0 +10,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>アヤ戻し</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -11,0 +15,6 @@
+<re_restr>綾戻し</re_restr>
+<re_restr>あや戻し</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>アヤもどし</reb>
+<re_restr>アヤ戻し</re_restr>
@@ -15,0 +25 @@
+<gloss>technical rally</gloss>

https://kotobank.jp/word/あや戻し-1264841
https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=綾戻し
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/r/retracement.asp

Done.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<misc>&obsc;</misc>
+<misc>&arch;</misc>
@@ -16,0 +17,8 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1577400">海神・かいしん・1</xref>
+<misc>&arch;</misc>
+<gloss>sea god</gloss>
+<gloss>Poseidon</gloss>
+<gloss>Neptune</gloss>
+</sense>

The 海神 entry is already pretty messy. I approved an edit which added 海人 to the 海神 entry but maybe we should reverse that and instead add a "sea god" sense here. 海人/かいじん appears to be archaic. Might be better to keep it separate from the other entries.

Daijisen 
https://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/word/海人_(かいじん
%29/

From the Daijisen entry this has the potential to be merged with the 海神 entry.

Daijr

Split from あま entry proposal.

Probably best to drop "mobile game". Mobile games existed before smartphones.

@@ -10 +9,0 @@
-<gloss>mobile game</gloss>

I think this is fine.
We have ゲー tagged as slang.

@@ -9 +9 @@
-<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<misc>&sl;</misc>
@@ -11 +11 @@
-<gloss>phone game</gloss>
+<gloss>smartphone game</gloss>

examples:
https://kanalupinus.com/smartphonegame/gametype/
https://theapp.jp/?p=2636
https://sukeshi.net/appgame/

Specifically "mobile game (on a smartphone)" but I don't know if that needs to be said.

english ngrams are down but based on the wiki article and simple hits (12k vs 75), there should be no cloud on gloss one

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>flammagenitus cloud</gloss>
+<gloss>flammagenitus</gloss>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/火災積雲
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flammagenitus_(cloud)

digital daijisen https://kotobank.jp/word/火災旋風-677209
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/火災旋風

世界大百科事典 第２版 https://kotobank.jp/word/火事旋風-1154116

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>pyrocumulonimbus cloud</gloss>
+<misc>&obsc;</misc>
+<gloss>pyrocumulonimbus (cloud)</gloss>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/火災積雲
https://news.yahoo.co.jp/byline/morisayaka/20200107-00157930

Hot topic as of late

I don't think it's really worth an entry. I have hundreds of potential terms with lowish 
(20-100) ngram counts and a number of valid www pages, but for which I don't think I should 
clutter the submission system.

https://www.google.co.uk/search?biw=1240&bih=665&tbm=nws&ei=3uMVXoiBDs32gQaFrozADQ&q="雷雪"+"の"&oq="雷雪"+"の"

The first link is the article I mentioned.
In the second link, it appears that the writer has coined 雷雪 on the spot. I wouldn't say it's an example of "thundersnow".
雷雪 does not appear in the third link.
In the fourth link, 雷雪 is only used to explain the meaning of サンダースノー.
---
A Google news search returns zero relevant results (besides that Logmi article). The Wikipedia article provides no references that contain "雷雪".
Even to be described as "obscure", I think we need more evidence that this term is actually used in Japanese.

https://logmi.jp/business/articles/268477
https://lineblog.me/sasimibentou76/archives/842271.html
http://www.vinz.jp/Nature_Winter_Thunder.html
https://www.hawaii-arukikata.com/news/2016_1228-thundersnow.html

Not used a lot, but here are some examples of usage.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<misc>&obsc;</misc>

This isn't in my refs and I can't find any other sources for it (except one non-technical article translated from English). It doesn't appear to be an established meteorological term in Japanese. The n-grams could be helpful here but I suspect it's barely used.

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/雷雪

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1495020">不眠症</xref>

daijr/s: https://kotobank.jp/word/インソムニア-1694580#E3.83.87.E3.82.B8.E3.82.BF.E3.83.AB.E5.A4.A7.E8.BE.9E.E6.B3.89

@@ -11,2 +11 @@
-<pos>&adv;</pos>
-<pos>&conj;</pos>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>

GG5 points to 何にしても.

https://kotobank.jp/word/何にしろ-2070474

@@ -21,0 +22 @@
+<gloss>LDS</gloss>

daijs

Reformat initialsms
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -7,0 +8,3 @@
+<reb>エル・ディー・エス</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -8,0 +12 @@
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2842678">ロイス・ディーツ症候群</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2842678">ロイスディーツ症候群</xref>

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<field>&med;</field>

daijs

none appear to be forthcoming.  ngrams are down so i can't check how common this is but it gets 61 google hits for whatever that's worth.  the meaning is relatively obvious from its components (freshly removed).  not in any ref and i don't think it's needed

References needed.

Adding spec1
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

@@ -11 +10,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>