6679 ngrams

@@ -7,0 +8,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>エクサイティング</reb>
+</r_ele>

daij

Not a noun.

@@ -10 +9,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>

Daijr, GG5, etc. Most refs gloss as a noun. Sense 2 from daijr.

@@ -13,0 +14,6 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2841438">オートロックシステム</xref>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<gloss>automatic door-locking system</gloss>
+</sense>

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -10 +10,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>self-locking</gloss>
+<gloss>automatic lock</gloss>

eij
オートロックの
形
    self-locking（ドアなどが）

glossed as an adj

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

daijr/s, gg5

Added "microscope slide" sense.
Added "shift" sense (daijr/s sense 3).
I don't believe we need a noun "change" sense.

@@ -11 +11,2 @@
-<gloss>slide</gloss>
+<gloss>slide (for projection)</gloss>
+<gloss>transparency</gloss>
@@ -15,2 +16,3 @@
-<gloss>change (in value or situation)</gloss>
-<gloss>proportional change</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2489740">スライドガラス</xref>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<gloss>(microscope) slide</gloss>
@@ -25,2 +27,9 @@
-<gloss>to change (in value, e.g. with a sliding scale)</gloss>
-<gloss>to change (in situation)</gloss>
+<gloss>to shift (e.g. a group of items in a schedule)</gloss>
+<gloss>to move</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1965300">スライド制</xref>
+<gloss>to change (with a sliding scale)</gloss>
+<gloss>to index (to)</gloss>
+<gloss>to peg</gloss>

669 ngrams

@@ -6,0 +7,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>センティメンタル</reb>

中辞典: 日本語で「ナイーブ」は「子供のように素直な」の意味で使われるが, naive は「世間知らずの」「だまされやす
い」のような意味で使われることが多い.

As per the ref, I think it's safer to leave "naive" out of the glosses.

21972 ngrams; wikipedia redirect

i also disagree that naive should be removed as a gloss

@@ -6,0 +7,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ナイーヴ</reb>

I have added an alternative English sentence and linked it instead.

daij, prog

I know the comment was about the example sentence, but I 
agree with the sentiment that "naive" is very rarely an 
accurate translation of ナイーブ, to the extent I think 
keeping it in is misleading.

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<gloss>naive</gloss>
+<lsource xml:lang="eng">naive</lsource>

The example sentence is mistranslated. ナイーブ is almost 
never used to mean "naive" in the English sense. It's 
almost exclusively used to mean 純粋で傷つきやすいさま -- 
in other words, "You're surprisingly sensitive" would be a 
much more accurate translation than "You're so naive." 
(Where does the "so" even come from?)

i'd prefer just the word "memory" with no tags at all.  but either way

gg5
daijr: "記憶。思い出。記念。"

This usually refers to computer memory. The refs have two senses.

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<field>&comp;</field>
@@ -14,0 +16,6 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>memory</gloss>
+<gloss>recollection</gloss>
+<gloss>remembrance</gloss>
+</sense>

daijr/daijs: 「記憶。思い出。記念」

@@ -13 +12,0 @@
-<field>&comp;</field>

-> the obvious abbr

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>laboratory</gloss>
+<gloss>lab</gloss>
@@ -18 +18 @@
-<gloss>language laboratory</gloss>
+<gloss>language lab</gloss>

koj

@@ -15,0 +16,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1140000">ランゲージラボラトリー</xref>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>

@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1139760">ラボラトリー</xref>

ngrams

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>しし座</keb>
+</k_ele>

@@ -13,1 +13,1 @@
-<gloss>(constellation) Leo</gloss>
+<gloss>Leo (constellation)</gloss>

@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@
+<field>&astron;</field>

が電子化し	653
を電子化し	17970
電子化された情報	1477
電子化した情報	384

Usually transitive.

https://www.sei-info.co.jp/document-plus/keyword/digitizing.html
書類を電子化する方法とメリット・デメリットを紹介
daijs examples
「契約手続きを―する」 「書類を―する」

possibly vt,vi, though?

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

I don't see any need for those glosses.

@@ -16,2 +15,0 @@
-<gloss>conversion to electronics</gloss>
-<gloss>conversion to electronic form</gloss>

I know GG5 has "electronization", but it grates somewhat.

@@ -11,0 +12,2 @@
+<field>&physics;</field>
+<field>&chem;</field>

meikyo
「～を髣髴する」よりも「～を髣髴（と）させる」の形が一般的。

sense 1 could use a usage note

@@ -21,0 +22 @@
+<s_inf>usu. as 〜を彷彿とさせる</s_inf>

gg5, daijr, gg5

Added sense.

@@ -22 +22 @@
-<gloss>close resemblance</gloss>
+<gloss>(bearing a) close resemblance</gloss>
@@ -24,0 +25,8 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&adv-to;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-t;</pos>
+<gloss>dim</gloss>
+<gloss>faint</gloss>
+<gloss>vague</gloss>
+<gloss>blurred</gloss>
+</sense>

Yes, that should go first.

@@ -10 +10 @@
-<reb>わたくししょうせつ</reb>
+<reb>ししょうせつ</reb>
@@ -15 +15 @@
-<reb>ししょうせつ</reb>
+<reb>わたくししょうせつ</reb>

GG5; also standard in English scholarship on Japanese literature (where I've mainly seen it hyphenated)

By the way, in a majority of my refs, daijr/nikk/shinjirin, the "ししょうせつ" reading has the definition, while the "わたくししょうせつ" reading redirects to it.

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<gloss>I-novel</gloss>

gg5

I don't think the 内々 x-ref is needed. They're used differently.

@@ -22,2 +22,3 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1582450">内々・うちうち</xref>
-<s_inf>as 〜に</s_inf>
+<s_inf>oft. as 〜に</s_inf>
+<gloss>secretly</gloss>
+<gloss>covertly</gloss>
@@ -25 +25,0 @@
-<gloss>secretly</gloss>

I can't see any source.

@@ -26 +25,0 @@
-<gloss>gloomily</gloss>

Where did the last gloss come from? Chuujiten only has the first two, while Daijr J-E has "tacitly" and "implicitly". I'm not seeing anything in my Kokugos that would point towards "gloomy".

@@ -26 +26 @@
-<gloss>gloomy</gloss>
+<gloss>gloomily</gloss>

It would be handy to have these for text-glossing purposes, so I've added all 12 versions of each to the "specials" glossing dictionary. That's where I also have precomposed things 第五次, 第八部, ３種類, the numbers １-１００, etc.

we have entries for 1, 2, and 9 but no other number.  an entry for かげつ already exists.  generally we keep the entry for 1+counter and nuke the rest unless there's a specific reason to keep them.  i see no reason to have 2 and 9 but no other number

Removing suggested xref. Comment also at 鬨. I think if you were looking for "battle cry" you should probably stick with this.  I don't *think* that the xref is really a "more common substitute", which was my initial motivation.

@@ -16,3 +15,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1542530">雄叫び</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1542530">雄叫び</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1542530">雄叫び</xref>

sankoku: 『戦争の時兵士の気持ちを励ますために』大勢で同時に上げる叫び声。ときの声

Reorder glosses to match 鬨。

There is definitely a nuance difference between 鬨の声 and 雄叫び.  The latter seems applicable to a single person (or a group), while this term seems to me a team effort. (soldiers on a battlefield, a whole office full of workers).  Not [hist], though image search does give battlefield imagery which makes it look more dated.

@@ -15,0 +16,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1542530">雄叫び</xref>
+<gloss>battle cry</gloss>
@@ -17 +18,0 @@
-<gloss>battle cry</gloss>

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos>

gg5

ハイパー英語辞書 https://ejje.weblio.jp/content/高架橋

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>viaduct</gloss>

Yes, odd.

daijr: "重傷と軽傷"

I think "or" looks odd here. This term is used when reporting about multiple injured people whose injuries vary in severity.

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>major or minor injuries</gloss>
+<gloss>major and minor injuries</gloss>

GG5, etc.

Odd term.

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<gloss>serious or slight injury</gloss>

https://mainichi.jp/articles/20190719/k00/
00m/040/116000c
...男を除く35人が重軽症を負った事件で...

重軽症	820
重軽傷	95768

iK?

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>重軽症</keb>

GG5: そう言われればなるほど思い当たるふしがある. Now you mention it, I remember. | That 「calls to 
mind [reminds me of] something I had forgotten.
今にして思えば, そのときの彼の行動に思い当たるふしがある. Come to think of it, now I think I understand 
why he acted the way he did. | With hindsight, the reason for his behavior has occurred to 
me.

Maybe this works?

@@ -17 +17,2 @@
-<gloss>to have something familiar about it</gloss>
+<gloss>to be reminded of something</gloss>
+<gloss>to understand a point</gloss>

i'm unsure of how best to gloss this but i think this mix-and-match approach is potentially confusing.

sense 1 is written as if the person remembering as the subject, and sense 2 is written as if the thing remembered is the subject.  because this entry doesn't start with に, i think sense 1 has the better perspective for the entry, but i don't like the gloss used

https://www.weblio.jp/content/思い当たるふしがある
https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=思い当たる節

Was used in reference to speech in an unrecognized foreign language.

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<gloss>to have something familiar about it</gloss>

daijs/meikyo: "古くは「たれしも」とも"

"連語" in daijr/s

@@ -9,0 +10,4 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>たれしも</reb>
+<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>
@@ -11 +15 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
@@ -19 +23 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>

@@ -24 +24 @@
-<gloss>no-one</gloss>
+<gloss>no one</gloss>

@@ -21 +21,2 @@
-<gloss>no-one (with neg. verb)</gloss>
+<s_inf>with neg. verb</s_inf>
+<gloss>no-one</gloss>

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1416860">誰も</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1416860">誰も・1</xref>
@@ -19,0 +20 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1416860">誰も・2</xref>

seems a little sketchy to combine the pos, yes

エコ	6209916
エコな	154491
エコの	73764

Not really 2 senses. Wouldn't normally combine these pos, but it seems best here.

@@ -7,0 +8 @@
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
@@ -9 +10 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1028390">エコロジー</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2484040">エコロジカル</xref>
@@ -10,0 +12 @@
+<gloss>ecological</gloss>
@@ -13,4 +14,0 @@
-<sense>
-<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
-<gloss>ecological</gloss>
-</sense>

GG5; digital daijs (https://kotobank.jp/word/エコ-444377)

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&pref;</pos>
@@ -11 +11 @@
-<gloss>ecology</gloss>
+<gloss>eco-</gloss>

@@ -13,0 +13,4 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
+<gloss>ecological</gloss>
+</sense>

gg5
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_data_storage#Primary_storage

@@ -13 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>main storage</gloss>
+<gloss>main memory</gloss>
+<gloss>primary storage</gloss>

Entry created

first "one's" is unneeded

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>clasping one's chopsticks between one's hands as in a gesture of prayer (a breach of etiquette)</gloss>
+<gloss>clasping chopsticks between one's hands as in a gesture of prayer (a breach of etiquette)</gloss>

To third-person singular

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>clasping your chopsticks between your hands as in a gesture of prayer (a breach of etiquette)</gloss>
+<gloss>clasping one's chopsticks between one's hands as in a gesture of prayer (a breach of etiquette)</gloss>

Entry created

we have entries for 1, 2, and 9 but no other number.  an entry for かげつ already exists.  generally we keep the entry for 1+counter and nuke the rest unless there's a specific reason to keep them.  i see no reason to have 2 and 9 but no other number

@@ -5,0 +6,15 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>二ヵ月</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>二カ月</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>二か月</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>二箇月</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>二ケ月</keb>

Entry created

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬───────────┬───────╮
│ 笑える　 │ 2,018,703 │ 99.4% │
│ 嗤える　 │     1,070 │  0.1% │ - adding (only meikyo)
│ わらえる │    11,612 │  0.6% │
╰─ーーーー─┴───────────┴───────╯

@@ -5,0 +6,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>嗤える</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

daijr: "ひとりでに笑えてくる。自然に笑った状態になる。おかしくて笑わずにいられない。「しぐさを見ているだけで―・えてくる」"

According to the definition, the subject is the person who's laughing, not the thing that makes you laugh, but you also have usage like "あの大げさな名前が笑えるよね".
It might be clearer to have two senses.

@@ -11,0 +12,11 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<gloss>to laugh</gloss>
+<gloss>to break into laughter</gloss>
+<gloss>to be made to laugh</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<gloss>to be funny</gloss>
+<gloss>to be laughable</gloss>
+<gloss>to make one laugh</gloss>
@@ -13 +23,0 @@
-<gloss>to be laughable</gloss>

Fair enough.

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>to be made to laugh</gloss>
+<gloss>to make one smile</gloss>
+<gloss>to be laughable</gloss>

I'd just like to add that we include "no one"/"nobody" here for the same reason other JE dictionaries do: it's helpful. These are the most common English translations.
It's the same with 誰も. "誰も知らない" translates to "no one knows", not "everyone doesn't know". 
This difference in structure between English and Japanese is not especially difficult to grasp, especially in context.
I think excluding these glosses would actually be more confusing to a leaner.

koj: 
（下に打消の語を伴う）どの人も。一人として。「―気がつかない」
gg5:
だれ一人(…ない)　no one; nobody; 《not》 anyone [anybody].

"with neg. verb" is our way of indicating 下に打消の語を伴う as in koj or (…ない) as in gg5

I am restoring the version that was approved by Robin, Jim, and (now) me, which matches what GG5 has.

Rather than re-editing an entry approved by three of the editors, this is an issue for the mailing list. The entry for 誰一人 is not the place to relitigate how an entire class of entries is written.

@@ -20,0 +21,2 @@
+<gloss>no one</gloss>
+<gloss>nobody</gloss>

Those last two senses were essentially duplicates, as well as going completely against the logic of the way the first two are written.

@@ -21,2 +20,0 @@
-<gloss>no one</gloss>
-<gloss>nobody</gloss>

I'm happy with this version. If anyone is considering at further edits, please look first at the September 09 discussion train in a rejected fork (Advanced Search and enable "Rejected".)

I don't think we need a separate sense, just a couple of glosses like this.
Not an adverb according to the kokugos.

@@ -18 +17,0 @@
-<pos>&n-adv;</pos>
@@ -20 +19,3 @@
-<gloss>no-one</gloss>
+<gloss>(not) anyone</gloss>
+<gloss>(not) a single person</gloss>
+<gloss>no one</gloss>
@@ -23,5 +23,0 @@
-<sense>
-<pos>&exp;</pos>
-<pos>&n-adv;</pos>
-<gloss g_type="lit">anyone</gloss>
-</sense>

Aligning.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>large lever used to control a train</gloss>
+<gloss>lever used to control the speed of a train</gloss>

No sign of "master controller" used this way in English.

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<reb>マスター・コントローラー</reb>
+<reb>マスターコントローラー</reb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>マスターコントローラー</reb>
+<reb>マスター・コントローラー</reb>
@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>master controller (large lever used to control a train)</gloss>
+<lsource ls_wasei="y">master controller</lsource>
+<gloss>large lever used to control a train</gloss>

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>マスター・コントローラー</reb>
+</r_ele>

wiki

Wikipedia links to "Control stand" but I think that's the whole dashboard, not just the lever.

GG5

See the discussion on the マスターコントローラー entry.

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<gloss>large lever used to control a train</gloss>
+<gloss>lever used to control the speed of a train</gloss>

Wiki says this is a "control stand" in English
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Control_stand

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<gloss>master controller (large lever used to control a train)</gloss>
+<gloss>large lever used to control a train</gloss>

wiki

https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?
content=food+porn%2C+gastro+pub&year_start=180
0&year_end=2019&corpus=26&smoothing=3&direct_u
rl=t1%3B%2Cfood%20porn%3B%2Cc0%3B.t1%3B%2Cgast
ro%20pub%3B%2Cc0

(a google books English corpus ngrams search 
comparing "food porn" with the word "gastro 
pub", showing both started becoming popular 
around the same time, but that "food porn" in 
2019 was around 2.5x more common)

Welcome to JMdict, Nicolaus. 

"Food porn" is far from obscure. The Japanese 
word itself is slang and could be considered 
offensive for its casual　reference to terror. 
Although the (largely hypothetical) potential 
for offensiveness might be different, I think 
it's a good match in register. Finding the 
right translation is always a balancing act, 
especially for slang, but I'm not seeing at 
all any issues with having "lewdness" (which I 
frankly struggle to see in expression "food 
porn") in the first gloss. 

Also, we don't add usage notes on the English 
glosses, only on the Japanese itself. There 
could be advantages to adding such notes, but 
since something like that would affect a lot 
of entries, that discussion would be best 
suited for our Github: 
https://github.com/JMdictProject/JMdictIssues/

@@ -19,2 +19,2 @@
-<gloss>appetizing pictures of food (slang: food porn)</gloss>
-<gloss>terrorizing people by posting images of strong appetite inducing food</gloss>
+<gloss>food porn (i.e. appetizing pictures of food)</gloss>
+<gloss>terrorizing people by posting food porn</gloss>

The English slang would be "food porn" which something even most English speakers have never heard of.
Can we please keep the lewdness out of being the primary definition?
I realize this is going back and forth, so maybe moving the "food porn" part to the parentheses keeps this congruent yet more appropriate.

@@ -19,2 +19,2 @@
-<gloss>food porn (i.e. appetizing pictures of food)</gloss>
-<gloss>terrorizing people by posting food porn</gloss>
+<gloss>appetizing pictures of food (slang: food porn)</gloss>
+<gloss>terrorizing people by posting images of strong appetite inducing food</gloss>

Neither the Google nor Kyoto corpora have n-grams to lean on, but plenty of usage on Twitter: https://twitter.com/search?q="メシテロ"&f=live.

@@ -8,0 +9,4 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>メシテロ</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>

OK

We were thinking of a tag for these things. I was keeping the note to remind me. I guess it's not needed at present.

But it's not just used on signs. I don't think the note is appropriate if there's only one sense.

I'd keep that note - we've been discussing a tag for such thinhs.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<s_inf>on signage</s_inf>

eijiro: この船は全面禁煙となっております。 Smoking is prohibited in all areas of this ship.
        敷地内全面禁煙  NO SMOKING ANYWHERE ON PREMISES《掲示》

I think it's the same thing.
"absolutely no smoking" probably isn't a great gloss. I don't think we need two senses.
"completely non-smoking" isn't a noun but I think it's helpful for translation purposes.

@@ -11,5 +10,0 @@
-<pos>&exp;</pos>
-<s_inf>on signage</s_inf>
-<gloss>absolutely no smoking</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
@@ -17,2 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>complete smoking ban</gloss>
-<gloss>total ban on smoking</gloss>
+<gloss>total ban on smoking (in all areas)</gloss>
+<gloss>completely non-smoking</gloss>

KOD: 全面禁煙 a total ban on smoking.
私たちの職場は全面禁煙です. Our workplace is completely nonsmoking.

全面 in this context is more full/total/all/etc.

GG5 and 中辞典 actually have separate editorial groups.

https://mineralseducationcoalition.org/minerals-database/arsenic/

Sorry to reopen this.
新和英中辞典 is the abridged version of GG5 so their glosses are usually the same.
I don't think this refers to the freshly exposed form. That daijr definition is just describing what happens when it's exposed to the air.
Looking at the kokugo definitions, I'm fairly confident that "arsenic mineral" is the best translation here (and I'm not really convinced by "arsenious anhydride").

@@ -11,0 +12,2 @@
+<field>&geol;</field>
+<gloss>arsenic mineral</gloss>
@@ -13 +14,0 @@
-<gloss>arsenic mineral (freshly exposed)</gloss>

ascii shrug.  seems sensible to me

中辞典 has "arsenious anhydride" too. Daijr: "ヒ素の元素鉱物。新鮮な面では錫(すず)白色で金属光沢を呈するが、空気に触れると暗色となる。"

So according to Daijirin it's the form you see before it reacts with the atmosphere.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>arsenic</gloss>
+<gloss>arsenic mineral (freshly exposed)</gloss>

daijs: "砒素を含む有毒の鉱物"
shinmeikai: "砒素・硫黄・鉄から成る鉱石。強い毒を持つ"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arsenic_minerals

Are these translations correct?
My guess is that "arsenic mineral" is more accurate. I'm hoping someone with some knowledge about this stuff could confirm.

建築構造	68378

gg5, eij, 機械工学英和和英辞典:
building construction

i'm not really sure what this adds.  this seems like a common enough compound noun to be worth having, but the english glosses are vague enough that they don't really tell me much.  but i know nothing about architecture or structural engineering

@@ -12,2 +12 @@
-<gloss>architectural construction</gloss>
-<gloss>structure and design of a building</gloss>
+<gloss>building construction</gloss>

https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=建築構造

Reformat initialsms
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -7,0 +8,3 @@
+<reb>エム・エル・エス</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -8,0 +12 @@
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

daijs

daijs, gg5

gg5, daijs

koj, gg5

daijs

daijs, wiki

gakken katakana

web hits suggest overlap with manga/anime

wiki
https://www.weblio.jp/content/ロリカ

daijs

オートロックマンション	4850
ＫＯＤ追加語彙

オートロックシステム	13206
Daijr - sense 2 of オートロック entry.

not sure.  poss sense 1

中辞典(見境 entry) - 見境がつかない cannot tell [distinguish] one thing from another; cannot 
distinguish [tell the difference between] one thing and another
見境がつかない	511
見境が付かない	57

Suggested by a correspondent. Not very common, but meaning not obvious. Not sure I have 
the right sense for 付く.

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos>

daijr/s, nikk
一衣帯水	5862
一葦の水	No matches

*kanji.  uggh

meikyo includes the kaniji

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>鬨を作る</keb>

gg5, daij, koj

arbitrary number + counter entry.  rejecting.  there are a couple of other かげつ entries in the dictionary i will put up for deletion

Adding spec1
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

@@ -1,3 +1,2 @@
-<ent_seq>2841427</ent_seq>
-<ent_corp>jmdict</ent_corp>
+<ent_corp>jmnedict</ent_corp>

Wikipedia etc.

daijs

nm; already an entry with "Keb"

daijs, wiki

ancient egyptian god.  following the format for horus and osiris