@@ -15,2 +15 @@
-<gloss>baumkuchen</gloss>
-<gloss g_type="expl">spit cake with cross-section resembling tree rings</gloss>
+<gloss>baumkuchen (German spit cake)</gloss>

lsrc usu. given for german nouns even when the text matches the english gloss because they are capitalized in german

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<lsource xml:lang="ger"/>
+<lsource xml:lang="ger">Baumkuchen</lsource>

enwiki (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baumkuchen)

Not in English dictionaries.

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<field>&food;</field>
@@ -14,0 +16 @@
+<gloss g_type="expl">spit cake with cross-section resembling tree rings</gloss>

daijs, Cross

@@ -7,0 +7,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>バームクーヘン</reb>

-> the obvious abbr

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>laboratory</gloss>
+<gloss>lab</gloss>
@@ -18 +18 @@
-<gloss>language laboratory</gloss>
+<gloss>language lab</gloss>

koj

@@ -15,0 +16,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1140000">ランゲージラボラトリー</xref>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>

@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1139760">ラボラトリー</xref>

OK

daijr/s, koj, meikyo

I think it was fine as it was. In the kokugos, sense 1 is a noun and sense 2 is an adverb. Sense 2 is never used as a noun. I'm not seeing any adverbial examples for sense 1.

@@ -19 +18,0 @@
-<pos>&n-adv;</pos>
@@ -26 +25 @@
-<pos>&n-adv;</pos>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>

一切	17220123
一切な	1853
一切の	3573257

Unidic classifies as 名詞, 普通名詞, 副詞可能, -> Noun, Common Noun, Adverb-able

Added adverbial noun, and changed adverb to adverbial noun

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<pos>&n-adv;</pos>
@@ -25 +26 @@
-<pos>&adv;</pos>
+<pos>&n-adv;</pos>

Ok

daijs, meikyo split senses

rearranging glosses.  perhaps clearer as two senses?

@@ -17,0 +18,2 @@
+<gloss>public square</gloss>
+<gloss>square</gloss>
@@ -19 +20,0 @@
-<gloss>(public) square</gloss>
@@ -21,0 +23,4 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>open space</gloss>
@@ -23 +27,0 @@
-<gloss>open space</gloss>

「森の広場」

@@ -21,0 +22 @@
+<gloss>clearing</gloss>

GG5, etc.

@@ -20,0 +20,3 @@
+<gloss>piazza</gloss>
+<gloss>forum</gloss>
+<gloss>open space</gloss>

新和英中辞典, ルミナス和英辞典

@@ -19,0 +19,1 @@
+<gloss>(public) square</gloss>

You're right. I just switched out the pn for n without thinking carefully about it.

i have some problems with this being a noun.  a) i don't see a ref for it, b) if anything, it should be a pronoun not a noun, c) it doesn't really make sense because it's not used as a noun.  the も is still clearly acting as a particle because you just say 誰も知らない not 誰もは知らない.  just exp makes the most sense, as in daijr

@@ -14 +13,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -20 +18,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>

temp approve

"連語" in daijr.

@@ -13 +13,2 @@
-<pos>&pn;</pos>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -18 +19,2 @@
-<pos>&pn;</pos>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -20 +22,2 @@
-<gloss>no-one</gloss>
+<gloss>no one</gloss>
+<gloss>nobody</gloss>

誰も知らない. Great film.

Merged さす【鎖す】 into new entry 2859960.

@@ -18,4 +17,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>さす</reb>
-<re_restr>鎖す</re_restr>
-</r_ele>
@@ -31 +26,0 @@
-<stagr>とざす</stagr>
@@ -37 +31,0 @@
-<stagr>とざす</stagr>
@@ -47 +40,0 @@
-<stagr>とざす</stagr>

I think it's OK.

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
| 閉ざす　 | 50,896 | 94.4% |
| 鎖す　　 |    861 |  1.6% |
| とざす　 |  2,171 |  4.0% |
|-ーーーー-+--------+-------|
| 閉ざして | 82,893 | 96.5% |
| 鎖して　 |    789 |  0.9% |
| とざして |  2,216 |  2.6% |

This might be objectionable since we have a さす restriction on 鎖す

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

getting to the point where it should be split

daij, meikyo

I don't think the glosses for sense 4 should be in the passive. It's not consistent with the rest of the entry.
I note that the kokugos don't have a separate sense for this usage; it's part of (our) sense 3.

@@ -43 +43 @@
-<gloss>to cover</gloss>
+<gloss>to cover (e.g. in darkness)</gloss>
@@ -49 +48,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1866170">悲しみに閉ざされる・かなしみにとざされる</xref>
@@ -51,2 +50,3 @@
-<gloss>to have closed feelings (usu. negative)</gloss>
-<gloss>to be bottled up</gloss>
+<gloss>to consume (with negative feelings)</gloss>
+<gloss>to fill (e.g. with sadness)</gloss>
+<gloss>to bury (e.g. in grief)</gloss>

@@ -40 +40,4 @@
-<gloss>scoring combination (in mahjong, card games, etc.)</gloss>
+<field>&mahj;</field>
+<field>&cards;</field>
+<field>&hanaf;</field>
+<gloss>scoring combination</gloss>

Thanks to everyone for the thoughtful feedback. I agree now that the entry is probably fine as-is, as long as we take care to avoid using "meld" and "yaku" interchangeably on senses that are mahjong-specific (unlike this one).

I agree with Jim - in hanafuda and mekuri karuta, "win condition" does not work at all as a translation. Thanks for sharing your expertise on mahjong through so many entries though, Stephen! (not to mention the great work you're doing on Yomichan)

@@ -41 +40,0 @@
-<gloss>win condition</gloss>
@@ -43,0 +43 @@
+<gloss>meld</gloss>

GG5: 〔カードゲームや麻雀の手〕

I'm uncomfortable with this edit as I feel it's rather too focused on the specific situation with mahjong, where a chow (which I regard as a type of meld) is not a "win condition". Unless we were to create a mahjong-specific sense, I'd rather the sense was left the way it was, with "meld" still there as a gloss. After all the term is used in other games too.

GG5, 中辞典, etc.

@@ -11,0 +12,2 @@
+<gloss>solicitude</gloss>
+<gloss>consideration</gloss>
@@ -12,0 +15 @@
+<gloss>(excessive) kindness</gloss>

老婆心 <老婆>
老婆心から

《give somebody advice》 though 《it》 may not be necessary

私は老婆心でこう言うのだ. I say this out of kindness [for your (own) good].
https://ejje.weblio.jp/content/老婆心

"concern" doesn't seem like a good/helpful translation

gg5

I don't think the 内々 x-ref is needed. They're used differently.

@@ -22,2 +22,3 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1582450">内々・うちうち</xref>
-<s_inf>as 〜に</s_inf>
+<s_inf>oft. as 〜に</s_inf>
+<gloss>secretly</gloss>
+<gloss>covertly</gloss>
@@ -25 +25,0 @@
-<gloss>secretly</gloss>

I can't see any source.

@@ -26 +25,0 @@
-<gloss>gloomily</gloss>

Where did the last gloss come from? Chuujiten only has the first two, while Daijr J-E has "tacitly" and "implicitly". I'm not seeing anything in my Kokugos that would point towards "gloomy".

@@ -26 +26 @@
-<gloss>gloomy</gloss>
+<gloss>gloomily</gloss>

from the crap range of entries.  seems unneeded now that sense 4 of 閉ざす has been added

閉ざす【とざす】 4. to have closed feelings (usu. negative); to be bottled up

Added additional PoS via batch update.Added additional PoS via batch update.
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@
+<pos>&v1;</pos>

GG5: そう言われればなるほど思い当たるふしがある. Now you mention it, I remember. | That 「calls to 
mind [reminds me of] something I had forgotten.
今にして思えば, そのときの彼の行動に思い当たるふしがある. Come to think of it, now I think I understand 
why he acted the way he did. | With hindsight, the reason for his behavior has occurred to 
me.

Maybe this works?

@@ -17 +17,2 @@
-<gloss>to have something familiar about it</gloss>
+<gloss>to be reminded of something</gloss>
+<gloss>to understand a point</gloss>

i'm unsure of how best to gloss this but i think this mix-and-match approach is potentially confusing.

sense 1 is written as if the person remembering as the subject, and sense 2 is written as if the thing remembered is the subject.  because this entry doesn't start with に, i think sense 1 has the better perspective for the entry, but i don't like the gloss used

https://www.weblio.jp/content/思い当たるふしがある
https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=思い当たる節

Was used in reference to speech in an unrecognized foreign language.

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<gloss>to have something familiar about it</gloss>

小股の切れ上がった	2454	89.9%
小股のきれ上がった	0	0.0%
小股の切れあがった	218	8.0%
小股のきれあがった	58	2.1%

@@ -5,0 +6,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>小股の切れあがった</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -13 +17 @@
-<gloss>(of a woman) slender and smartly shaped</gloss>
+<gloss>slender and smartly shaped (of a woman)</gloss>

小股の切れ上がった	2454
小股が切れ上がった	228

Sharp eyes.

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>こまたがきれあがった</reb>
+<reb>こまたのきれあがった</reb>

kanji has の, reading が?

Agree. No sound clip.

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>小股が切れ上がる</keb>
+<keb>小股の切れ上がった</keb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>こまたがきれあがる</reb>
+<reb>こまたがきれあがった</reb>
@@ -12,2 +12,2 @@
-<pos>&v5r;</pos>
-<gloss>(of a woman) to be slender and smartly shaped</gloss>
+<pos>&adj-f;</pos>
+<gloss>(of a woman) slender and smartly shaped</gloss>

G n-grams:
小股の切れ上がった	2454
小股が切れ上がった	228
小股の切れ上がる	No matches
小股が切れ上がる	120

I suggest changing this to [adj-f] - 小股の切れ上がった

daijs/meikyo: "古くは「たれしも」とも"

"連語" in daijr/s

@@ -9,0 +10,4 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>たれしも</reb>
+<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>
@@ -11 +15 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
@@ -19 +23 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>

@@ -24 +24 @@
-<gloss>no-one</gloss>
+<gloss>no one</gloss>

@@ -21 +21,2 @@
-<gloss>no-one (with neg. verb)</gloss>
+<s_inf>with neg. verb</s_inf>
+<gloss>no-one</gloss>

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1416860">誰も</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1416860">誰も・1</xref>
@@ -19,0 +20 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1416860">誰も・2</xref>

I'd just like to add that we include "no one"/"nobody" here for the same reason other JE dictionaries do: it's helpful. These are the most common English translations.
It's the same with 誰も. "誰も知らない" translates to "no one knows", not "everyone doesn't know". 
This difference in structure between English and Japanese is not especially difficult to grasp, especially in context.
I think excluding these glosses would actually be more confusing to a leaner.

koj: 
（下に打消の語を伴う）どの人も。一人として。「―気がつかない」
gg5:
だれ一人(…ない)　no one; nobody; 《not》 anyone [anybody].

"with neg. verb" is our way of indicating 下に打消の語を伴う as in koj or (…ない) as in gg5

I am restoring the version that was approved by Robin, Jim, and (now) me, which matches what GG5 has.

Rather than re-editing an entry approved by three of the editors, this is an issue for the mailing list. The entry for 誰一人 is not the place to relitigate how an entire class of entries is written.

@@ -20,0 +21,2 @@
+<gloss>no one</gloss>
+<gloss>nobody</gloss>

Those last two senses were essentially duplicates, as well as going completely against the logic of the way the first two are written.

@@ -21,2 +20,0 @@
-<gloss>no one</gloss>
-<gloss>nobody</gloss>

I'm happy with this version. If anyone is considering at further edits, please look first at the September 09 discussion train in a rejected fork (Advanced Search and enable "Rejected".)

I don't think we need a separate sense, just a couple of glosses like this.
Not an adverb according to the kokugos.

@@ -18 +17,0 @@
-<pos>&n-adv;</pos>
@@ -20 +19,3 @@
-<gloss>no-one</gloss>
+<gloss>(not) anyone</gloss>
+<gloss>(not) a single person</gloss>
+<gloss>no one</gloss>
@@ -23,5 +23,0 @@
-<sense>
-<pos>&exp;</pos>
-<pos>&n-adv;</pos>
-<gloss g_type="lit">anyone</gloss>
-</sense>

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2003250">タコス</xref>
@@ -20 +21 @@
-<gloss>tacos party</gloss>
+<gloss>taco party</gloss>

https://www.gizmodo.jp/2019/03/amazon-tacosgoods-matome.html
Terrace House

@@ -14,0 +15,7 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<misc>&col;</misc>
+<s_inf>short for タコスパーティー</s_inf>
+<gloss>tacos party</gloss>
+</sense>

https://matome.miil.me/articles/AzPIJ
google images
lots of hits on twitter

Probably not. We don't tag ダンベル that way.

I don't think this qualifies as a "sports" term

@@ -9 +8,0 @@
-<field>&sports;</field>

Daijr, ＫＯＤ追加語彙

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<field>&sports;</field>

wiki

https://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q14194164829  -> 「てなもんや」・・・「ってなもんだ」＝「というものだ」

How's this?

@@ -12 +12,4 @@
-<gloss>...</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1008510">と言うもの・というもの</xref>
+<misc>&col;</misc>
+<gloss>something like ...</gloss>
+<gloss>something called ...</gloss>

てなもん	58633
ってなもん	93962

=というもの
http://yourei.jp/って�%
AA%E3%82%82%E3%82%93
Can't come up with a gloss

Drop it.

I agree. I'm not sure we need this at all.

Abbreviation of スマート歩き and related to ポールウォーキング. I don't think it's related to texting and スマホ.

http://polewalking.jp/smartwalking.html

Not entirely sure about this one, could be just a publicity-related buzzword. Saw it on the subway.

meikyo defines "love scene" as displaying affection
映画・演劇・テレビドラマなどで、情愛を表現する場面。濡れ場。

shinmeikai defines "love scene" as including kissing and embracing
恋人同士が接吻(セツプン)したり 抱擁したり する場面。

i'm not sure what a large number of quotes from random wikipedia pages given without any context is supposed to prove.  not knowing the context, it's impossible to determine what 愛を交わす actually refers to in those scenes

i agree with Jim that this there is no evidence provided against believing that this a broad term that could include mutual affection through sex or in other ways.

and the original ref doesn't even have this as an entry; it's merely used as an example.  in OP's follow-up post, it appears as if he/she is possibly confused in the difference between a "love scene" and a "sex scene"?

regardless, i see no need of this.  in context, the proposed euphemistic meaning can be determined easily from 愛 + 交わす in any case

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/娼婦ベロニカ
負けなかったが傷ついたベロニカを手当したマルコと愛を交わす。
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/殺人を無罪にする方法
... 容疑者となったサムが逃げるかもしれないと言い、二人は愛を交わす。その後アナリーズはサムに電話をして ...
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/ニューヨーク、アイラブユー
数日前に一夜限りのつもりで愛を交わしたリディアとガスは再会のためバーへと向かう……。
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/黒いオルフェ
最初は別々にすごしていたが、ユーリディスが誘い、愛を交わした夜が明ける。
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/SMAP×SMAPのコント・キャラクター
... パパのいない間に愛を交わそうとしていた。
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/中城ふみ子
しかし作品全体のクライマックスはやはり若月とふみ子が愛を交わした場面であり、 ...
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/髪結いの亭主
雷雨の夕刻、愛を交わしたマチルドは、買い物に行くと言って雨の中を出ていき、増水した川に身投げした。
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/誘惑は嵐の夜に
... 彼から告白されて雨が降り始めるのも構わず、2人で彼の部屋に訪れて愛を交わす。
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/炎の口づけ
ジョンとイグリットが愛を交わすシーンは近くの洞窟で撮影された。
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/ローリング_(映画)
... 10年前に盗撮された女子更衣室のビデオを見ていた。そこには、今は芸能人として活躍する朋美（井端珠里）が生前のジュン（星野かよ）と愛を交わす姿も映っている。
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/シャナラ・クロニクルズ
ウィルとアンバリーはデーモン軍に包囲されるアーボロンに戻り、洞窟で愛を交わす。
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/24_-TWENTY_FOUR-_の登場人物
しかし、彼と愛を交わした直後、 ...

...And so on.

I think we can agree that it is an euphemism exactly like "to make love" is.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>to make love</gloss>
+<gloss>to make love (euph.)</gloss>

Daijirin on ラブシーン: "恋人などがキスや抱擁をする場面。 "

Daijisen defines the term ラブシーン with these words:

映画・テレビ・演劇などで、恋人同士などが愛を交わす場面。ぬれ場。

GG5: 二人はかつて愛を交わした間柄だった． They were once in love with each other.

The Eijiro reference doesn't support the suggested gloss. Literally it means to exchange love/affection, without a particular sexual reference.
I doubt it's needed.

にゅるっと	2940
ニュルッと	1164
ニュルっと	1855

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ニュルっと</reb>
@@ -16,0 +20,2 @@
+<gloss>coweringly</gloss>
+<gloss>hesitantly</gloss>

http://sura-sura.com/archives/4143.html
https://onomatoproject.com/terms/nyurutto.html

Not in the usual refs, gloss needs double checking

Fork

"squirting; streaming" are not adverbs

GG5: チューブをきつく押すとシェービング･クリームがにゅるにゅる出てくる. Squeeze the tube firmly and shaving cream will come squirting out.
にゅるにゅる	4620

on-mim terms like these used as にゅるにゅる出てくる (etc.) are almost always tagged as adverbs by us and by kokugo dictionaries

@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+<misc>&on-mim;</misc>

Also not adverbs?

にゅるにゅる	4540	  
にゅるにゅると	1019	  
にゅるにゅるの	323

Maybe better?

@@ -9,2 +9,3 @@
-<gloss>squirting</gloss>
-<gloss>streaming</gloss>
+<pos>&adv-to;</pos>
+<gloss>slithering</gloss>
+<gloss>wriggling</gloss>

Fork: "squirting; streaming" are not adverbs.

https://kotobank.jp/jeword/にゅるにゅる
http://sura-sura.com/archives/4146.html

wouldn't this actually refer to the twisty snaky motion the cream does?

this entry gets the parsing wrong.  it's [行き+ながら]+に+して, not 行き+[ながら+に+して]

it's covered adequately by our entry for ながら=while

https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=ながらにして
https://ejje.weblio.jp/sentence/content/"ながらにして"

「行きながらにして食われる」

I agree. Not needed.

there is not actually an entry for this in either of the refs provided.  it's just used in some examples

there is already an entry for (生まれながら =  by nature; naturally) in the dictionary, and the 生まれながらにして form is used in some of its example sentences

personally, i don't see the need for both.  i suggest we follow the other sources in having no entry for this and just leaving it as examples of 生まれながら..  i would reject

https://ejje.weblio.jp/sentence/content/"生まれながらにして"
https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=生まれながらにして

gg5 example
原形をとどめない[失う]　have no trace [vestige] of its original form; lose 《its》 original form

harmless, but i agree

This is entirely literal in meaning. Sense 4 in daijr: "その状態のまま残す。「現職に―・める」「原形を―・めないほどのこわれ方」".
It's not an idiomatic expression. I see no need for it.

https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=原形を

建築構造	68378

gg5, eij, 機械工学英和和英辞典:
building construction

i'm not really sure what this adds.  this seems like a common enough compound noun to be worth having, but the english glosses are vague enough that they don't really tell me much.  but i know nothing about architecture or structural engineering

@@ -12,2 +12 @@
-<gloss>architectural construction</gloss>
-<gloss>structure and design of a building</gloss>
+<gloss>building construction</gloss>

https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=建築構造

agreed. esp. if the other one is approved

This refers to the building/structure itself. Not sure we need it.

https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=建築構造

「街の人の服装の簡単さ、建築構造物の単純さから考え、かなり遅れた文明圏だとわたしは判断した。」

I'll delete all of the following. I doubt any of the "s" tags are actually valid.
一区 [いっく] /(p) Ikku/
二区 [にく] /(p) Niku/
三区 [さんく] /(p) Sanku/
四区 [よんく] /(p) Yonku/
西区 [にしく] /(p) Nishiku/
五区 [ごく] /(p) Goku/
七区 [しちく] /(p) Shichiku/
十区 [じっく] /(p) Jikku/
一丁目 [いっちょうめ] /(p) Icchoume/
二丁目 [にちょうめ] /(p) Nichoume/
三丁目 [さんちょうめ] /(p,s) Sanchoume/
四丁目 [よんちょうめ] /(p) Yonchoume/
六丁目 [ろくちょうのめ] /(p) Rokuchounome/
六丁目 [ろくちょうめ] /(p) Rokuchoume/
八丁目 [はっちょうめ] /(p,s) Hacchoume/
十二丁目 [じゅうにちょうめ] /(p) Juunichoume/

i agree with Jim.  i think it would have to be an iconic place such as Fifth Avenue for this to qualify as an entry.  if 二区 is not referring to a *specific* place, then i don't think it really qualifies as a [place] at all.  for it to qualify as a [place], you would need a separate [place] sense for each notable instance that we wish to include in the dictionary.  but wikipedia has no entry for 二区, suggesting that there is no one [place] that is notable enough to be recorded as 二区.

i would suggest deleting this entry entirely, but surely there are a bunch of these other numbered entries in enamdict, and deleting this might result in weird inconsistency...  i suggest just rejecting for now.  mass deletion of 区s (etc.) can probably be more consistently handled in a batch

I did a quick search on Wikipedia and found quite a few Chinese municipalities with districts in the style of 一区、二区
https://ja.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?search=二区&title=特別:検索&fulltext=1&ns0=1

Along with 一区, 五区, 三区, 七区, 十区, etc. I don't think these are specific places. The same goes for 一町目, etc.
I could be wrong - "Fifth Avenue" is a place.
My inclination is to drop the N区, N町目, etc. entries.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tokyo_2nd_district

Is this useful?

@@ -12,0 +13,2 @@
+<gloss>Second Ward</gloss>
+<gloss>Second District</gloss>

Adding spec1
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

No oK in JMnedict.

@@ -9 +8,0 @@
-<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/国技院
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kukkiwon