I think it's fine.

daij, nikk

The kokugos say that ボタン comes from Portuguese. Is it OK to have two lsrc tags side by side like this?

@@ -9,2 +9,3 @@
-<lsource ls_wasei="y">cuffs button</lsource>
-<gloss>cuff links</gloss>
+<lsource xml:lang="eng">cuffs</lsource>
+<lsource xml:lang="por">botão</lsource>
+<gloss>cufflinks</gloss>

Bulk addition of vi and vt from Meikyo
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
@@ -14,0 +16 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<pos>&vs;</pos>

gg5, daij

Added sense.

@@ -11,0 +12,4 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>(musical) arrangement</gloss>
+</sense>

shouldn't these senses be split into different entries now?

Daijr, GG5

I can't find a reference saying it's "born".

@@ -10 +10 @@
-<gloss>born</gloss>
+<gloss>bone</gloss>

Fork

but this conjugates as an adjective?

that is not the purpose of the aux-adj tag.  the aux-adj tag refers to 助動詞 that conjugate like adjectives (e.g., らしい).  this is simply a suffix.  see らしい for an entry that distinguishes between the two

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<pos>&aux-adj;</pos>
+<pos>&suf;</pos>
@@ -25 +25 @@
-<pos>&aux-adj;</pos>
+<pos>&suf;</pos>

Yes, we already use it on ～ほしい, ～づらい,～たい etc.

The tag exists. Might as well use it.

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<pos>&suf;</pos>
+<pos>&aux-adj;</pos>
@@ -21 +21,2 @@
-<gloss>likely to ..., have a tendency to ...</gloss>
+<gloss>likely to ...</gloss>
+<gloss>have a tendency to ...</gloss>
@@ -24 +25 @@
-<pos>&suf;</pos>
+<pos>&aux-adj;</pos>

OK, done them. Did 苦しい[5] too.

Reopen

I see we have にくい, づらい and がたい marked "aux-adj,adj-i". I'll approve this, but for 
consistency the others should be aligned.

I just noticed that にくい, づらい and がたい are suffixes in the kokugos so I suppose suf is correct. But I don't know why the suffix sense of やすい is "形".

I agree it's not an auxiliary adjective (補助形容詞) but I'm not sure I'd call it a suffix either. It's just a regular sense in the kokugos (with "動詞の連用形の下に付く" at the start of the definition). I'd be in favour of creating a new PoS. It would be useful for search purposes.

Simpler, I guess.

@@ -30 +30 @@
-<gloss>having no way to dispel (a certain emotion)</gloss>
+<gloss>having no way to dispel (a feeling)</gloss>

遣る瀬無い	4069	2.6%
遣る瀬ない	922	0.6%
やる瀬ない	690	0.4%
やるせない	150759	96.4%

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -8,0 +10 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -11,0 +14 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

ウィズダム英和辞典 / ウィズダム和英辞典

added definitions

@@ -19,0 +20 @@
+<gloss>wretched</gloss>
@@ -22,0 +24 @@
+<gloss>sorrowful</gloss>

daijs

@@ -16 +15,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -18 +16,0 @@
-<gloss>founder</gloss>
@@ -20,0 +19,7 @@
+<gloss>founder</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>progenitor</gloss>
+<gloss>primogenitor</gloss>
+<gloss>founder of a family line</gloss>

FWIW, "the three teachings" seems to be a common English translation for this
https://www.google.com/search?hl=ja&q="the three teachings"

Daijr: 三つの宗教

I'm happy sticking with "religion". 宗教 can be creed/faith/etc. I'd hesitate to call Shinto some of the ones on the list.

I think the previous formatting was confusing. Do we really want to use "religions" rather then Nicolas' "teachings" here? 
Considering Confucianism is in there.

@@ -15 +14,0 @@
-<gloss>the three religions</gloss>
@@ -16,0 +16,4 @@
+<gloss g_type="lit">the three religions</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -17,0 +21,3 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>

GG5, 中辞典 (splits)

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>to be all out (of people)</gloss>
+<gloss>to be all out (e.g. of people)</gloss>
@@ -20,0 +21 @@
+<gloss>to have none left</gloss>

大辞林 + 大辞泉

@@ -13 +13,8 @@
-<gloss>to be all out</gloss>
+<gloss>to be all out (of people)</gloss>
+<gloss>to be all elsewhere</gloss>
+<gloss>to be all in use (e.g. of cars)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5u;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<gloss>to be sold out</gloss>

No apparent problems. I've added the others.

I'll experiment with ㍼ here to check it doesn't upset downstream systems. I'll approve and reopen.

@@ -8,0 +9,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>㍼</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

㍾　㍽ ㍼ ㍻　㋿
might as well include these as sK, no?

My JEs have it. I think this works OK.

not in any kokugo (although prog waei has it)

i'm not sure this entry is needed.  it's just the negative form of きれる, and all senses there could apply.  if it is kept, i think it should look something like this

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<pos>&aux-adj;</pos>
+<pos>&suf;</pos>
@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1384860">切れる・16</xref>
@@ -17,2 +18,2 @@
-<gloss>being too many (to finish or complete)</gloss>
-<gloss>being too much</gloss>
+<s_inf>after the -masu stem of a verb</s_inf>
+<gloss>cannot completely ... (because it is excessive)</gloss>

Won't hurt.

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
@@ -16 +17,2 @@
-<gloss>being too many or too much (to finish or complete)</gloss>
+<gloss>being too many (to finish or complete)</gloss>
+<gloss>being too much</gloss>

n-grams (2:1)

does an aux-adj need adj-i?

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>warrior picture (as a genre of ukiyo-e)</gloss>
+<gloss>warrior picture (genre of ukiyo-e)</gloss>

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Musha-e

PLEASE provide references for such changes.

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>warrior picture</gloss>
+<gloss>warrior picture (as a genre of ukiyo-e)</gloss>
+<gloss>musha-e</gloss>

daij, koj

Added sense. Not in the JEs. Koj says it's 隠語. Daijs says "符丁的に用いる".
I'm not seeing any adj-no examples for sense 1.

@@ -18 +17,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -21,0 +21,5 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<s_inf>from the number of fingers on both hands; used as secret jargon</s_inf>
+<gloss>ten</gloss>
+</sense>

Daijr, GG5, etc.
両手	2349172
諸手	42243
双手	6233
両手の	134178
諸手の	422
双手の	155

Quite agree. Splitting. No idea where "approvingly" came from.

@@ -10,6 +9,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>諸手</keb>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>双手</keb>
-</k_ele>
@@ -18 +11,0 @@
-<re_restr>両手</re_restr>
@@ -23,9 +15,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>もろて</reb>
-<re_restr>諸手</re_restr>
-<re_restr>双手</re_restr>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>そうしゅ</reb>
-<re_restr>双手</re_restr>
-</r_ele>
@@ -35,6 +19,2 @@
-<gloss>(with) both hands</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<gloss>approvingly</gloss>
+<gloss>both hands</gloss>
+<gloss>both arms</gloss>

shouldn't this be split into a 両手 / りょうて
and a 諸手, 双手 / もろて, そうしゅ entry

It's used in the UK.

GG5, 中辞典

Not a term I'd use.

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>driving licence</gloss>

@@ -7,0 +8,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>２期</keb>
@@ -16 +19,2 @@
-<gloss>two periods or terms</gloss>
+<gloss>two periods</gloss>
+<gloss>two terms</gloss>

perhaps just "to prevent falsification", etc. would be better

Daijirin

@@ -16 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>alternative kanji used for numbers</gloss>
+<s_inf>e.g. 壱, 弐, etc.</s_inf>
+<gloss>alternative kanji used for numbers (esp. in financial contexts)</gloss>

but if there's no standard to begin with 
then "alternative" by itself means 
nothing. you have to specify what they are 
an alternative to and that's hard to do in 
a pithy way if you're set on using the 
word "alternative". I think "non-standard" 
works better and means the same thing. I 
don't think the fact 大字 are used in 
certain legal/financial things means 
they're "just as standard" as the regular 
一、ニ、三 (they just aren't). I also don't 
understand why you removed 
(historical/legal)? Wasn't that a helpful 
addition? Maybe "financial" would be 
better than "legal", unsure, but I think 
it helps to explain in which contexts 
these characters are used. Otherwise it's 
unclear to which characters exactly are 
being referred to. With the current 
definition you might assume 逸 is a 大字 
too, but it isn't (and it's not used in 
legal contexts).

Daijirin: 「一・二・三」などの代わりに用いる「壱・弐・参・肆・伍・陸・漆・捌・玖・拾・佰・阡」などの字。金銭証書
などに用いる。

The use of "standard" implies some sort of official status, which is not the case. In fact 
大字 numerals are mostly used in financial contexts, where there is nothing "non-standard" 
about them. Returning to the former version.

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>non-standard kanji used for numbers (historical or legal)</gloss>
+<gloss>alternative kanji used for numbers</gloss>

Isn't "alternative" pretty much the same 
thing as "non-standard"? by calling them 
"non-standard" I'm saying that 一、二、三… 
are the standard number characters. 
Anyways I was just trying to improve/tweak 
the definition a little.

Seems ok.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1194810">花鳥風月</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1194810">花鳥風月・1</xref>

daijs

Tried to simplify it.

@@ -14,2 +14 @@
-<gloss>the beauties of nature as the key poetic theme</gloss>
-<gloss>the central theme in composing poetry (haiku) must be the beauties of nature and the harmony that exist between nature and man. (The slogan of the Hototogisu School of modern Japanese haiku)</gloss>
+<gloss>the beauties of nature and the harmony that exists between it and man (as the key poetic theme of a haiku)</gloss>

Kanji Haitani list

Adding yoji tagAdding yoji tag
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<misc>&yoji;</misc>

Entry created

OK. I'll align the variants.

gg5

I think it's better to use the uninflected "be".

@@ -13,0 +14,2 @@
+<gloss>have to</gloss>
+<gloss>have no choice but to</gloss>
@@ -15,4 +17,3 @@
-<gloss>have no choice but to</gloss>
-<gloss>am compelled to</gloss>
-<gloss>am obliged to</gloss>
-<gloss>it is incumbent upon (me) to</gloss>
+<gloss>be compelled to</gloss>
+<gloss>be obliged to</gloss>
+<gloss>be forced to</gloss>

OK

i don't think we can call this an "aux-adj" or a "suffix".  ざる is the suffix.  this is an expression and it inflects like adj-i.  so adj-i.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<pos>&aux-adj;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-i;</pos>

I've checked all the examples I can find, including the 23 Tatoeba sentences, and I think 
the previous glosses work better.

@@ -15,3 +15,4 @@
-<gloss>having no choice but to</gloss>
-<gloss>being compelled to</gloss>
-<gloss>being obliged to</gloss>
+<gloss>have no choice but to</gloss>
+<gloss>am compelled to</gloss>
+<gloss>am obliged to</gloss>
+<gloss>it is incumbent upon (me) to</gloss>

I have split off sense 2.

daijs, daijr

2 Should be its own entry, it does not share an origin with the negative helper nor are the meanings similar. Added [aux-adj] to reflect inflection paradigm.

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<pos>&aux-adj;</pos>
@@ -12,7 +12,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&suf;</pos>
-<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="2008630">忙しない</xref>
-<s_inf>after the root of an adjective</s_inf>
-<gloss>emphatic suffix</gloss>

I'll just make it "suf" like sense 2. ません should be the same.

@@ -9 +9 @@
-<pos>&aux-v;</pos>
+<pos>&suf;</pos>

is sense 1 aux-v or aux-adj?  do we really need separate tags for these?

should we just simplify by calling them all "aux" and call it a day?

No further discussion.

Added the old sense 2 to enamdict.

the 2nd one is a proper noun. if that's included, "Soho, London" and "SoHo, NYC" be included as well

@@ -16,4 +15,0 @@
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>Solar and Heliospheric Observatory</gloss>
-</sense>

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>small office home office</gloss>
@@ -14 +14,0 @@
-<gloss>small office home office</gloss>

sense 2 = enamdict?

Daijr, ＫＯＤ追加語彙, 新英和大辞典, etc.

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ＳＯＨＯ</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -10,0 +14,5 @@
+<gloss>small office home office</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>Solar and Heliospheric Observatory</gloss>

koj 女性の美しさを強調して描いた絵。特に日本においては、江戸初期から浮世絵を中心に発達...
mainly hist, not 100% exclusively

@@ -12 +12,4 @@
-<gloss>ukiyoe of beautiful women</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1497520">浮世絵</xref>
+<field>&art;</field>
+<misc>&hist;</misc>
+<gloss>portrait of a beautiful woman (esp. ukiyo-e)</gloss>

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bijin-ga

PLEASE provide references for such changes.
I don't like hyphens in Romanized Japanese terms, but bijin-ga seems to be the form used.
"ukiyoe print" is a tautology IMNSHO.

@@ -12,2 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>ukiyo-e print of beautiful women</gloss>
-<gloss>bijinga</gloss>
+<gloss>ukiyoe of beautiful women</gloss>
+<gloss>bijin-ga</gloss>

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>Ukiyo-e portraying beautiful women</gloss>
+<gloss>ukiyo-e print of beautiful women</gloss>
+<gloss>bijinga</gloss>

gg5/koj

Not gairaigo.

@@ -6,3 +5,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>フル・ボッコ</reb>

Converting somebody to someone
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<gloss>completely beating somebody up</gloss>
+<gloss>completely beating someone up</gloss>
@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss>thoroughly bashing somebody</gloss>
+<gloss>thoroughly bashing someone</gloss>

First, I'm reinstating フル・ボッコ. I will not accept anonymous additions or deletions which have no supporting case or references. I did wonder about it as it gets 0 n-gram counts, but I noticed a number of WWW hits for that form so I did not challenge it.
I guess it's OK to have the entry without etymology information. I see "Full Bokko" gets a lot of hits as "Full Booko Heroes" and "Full Booko Youcien" are games.

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>フル・ボッコ</reb>

@@ -6,3 +5,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>フル・ボッコ</reb>

I'm not really convinced it stems from フルパワー. It could just as well be from フル(に)ボッコボコ (as jitsuyo has it) and either way 
I don't feel it's really an abbr. I don't think a "poss. from" is really needed here but we could do an xref to ぼっこぼこ.

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2756750">ぼっこぼこ・1</xref>

We've still to resolve the copula pos issue, but I think this is just an expression.

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<pos>&cop-da;</pos>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
@@ -12 +12 @@
-<s_inf>used in place of the plain copula だ when attributing an utterance to a Korean; oft. derog.</s_inf>
+<s_inf>used in place of だ when attributing an utterance to a Korean; oft. derog.</s_inf>

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<lsource xml:lang="kor"/>
+<lsource xml:lang="kor">ni-da</lsource>

is this really cop-da?  it's not even japanese

Could be trimmed.

I'd go with this. Aligns closer with the Japanese.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>(two forces of) yin and yang</gloss>
+<gloss>two forces (of yin and yang)</gloss>

Better?

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>two forces of yin and yang</gloss>
+<gloss>(two forces of) yin and yang</gloss>

daij, koj

Couldn't think of a better gloss.

"poss. from Manchukuo dialect"
I don't think any source was saying it was from a Manchukuo dialect (of either Jap/Chinese) but poss. from a Japanese-Manchurian pidgin 
(協和語)
There's some hits for 協和語 アル in Google Books, it seems to not be just a wikipedia thing.

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<s_inf>used in place of だ when attributing an utterance to a Chinese person, poss. from Manchukuo dialect</s_inf>
+<s_inf>used in place of だ when attributing an utterance to a Chinese person; poss. from Manchukuo pidgin</s_inf>

Not sure we'll ever pin it down - this might be a good place to leave it.
I'm reminded of stereotypical gaijin, who always start sentences with "ワタシハ...".

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<s_inf>used in place of だ when attributing an utterance to a Chinese person</s_inf>
+<s_inf>used in place of だ when attributing an utterance to a Chinese person, poss. from Manchukuo dialect</s_inf>

there should be an lsrc or a note because without one the style of entry we use immediately suggests that it is either from english or japanese.

however, it seems entirely possible that this is from japanese.  a quick google search suggests it appears to be just some stereotype of chinese people trying to speak japanese and ending all of their sentences in aru because they don't know how to speak japanese properly?

it's not clear to me that its stereotypical usage in manga, etc. is really related to the pidgin (info here: https://www.icge.co.uk/languagesciencesblog/?p=315).  if it is, then it should be mentioned in a note; if not and it's actually just indicating improper usage of japanese, then we don't need an lsrc.

that's my take

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<lsource xml:lang="chi"/>

Why does there "need" to be a lsrc? We don't have evidence it's actually from Chinese.

https://www.itmedia.co.jp/mobile/articles/1809/25/news114.html
https://gameappch.com/rank/img_type.html?type=横持ち
https://simeji.me/blog/manuals/manuals_ver6/ver6_setting/flick-setting_landscape/id=3483

Ordinarily, I wouldn't consider this worth adding but we have this kanji/reading with a completely unrelated meaning.

@@ -16 +16,6 @@
-<gloss>conveying (goods, materials)</gloss>
+<gloss>conveyance (of goods, materials, etc.)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<gloss>holding horizontally (e.g. a smartphone)</gloss>

Daijr

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>横持</keb>
@@ -12 +15,2 @@
-<gloss>conveying (of goods and materials)</gloss>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<gloss>conveying (goods, materials)</gloss>

https://www.weblio.jp/content/横持ち
https://ejje.weblio.jp/content/横持ち

I've fixed the example link.

daijr/s

Splitting from 1022130.

We have both Bon and O-Bon. Need to sort that one out.

daijs

copied 2nd gloss from the Ｂｏｎｇｕｒｅ  entry but I feel it could be improved (do we usually capitalize Bon? Do we usually 
call it Bon or o-bon?)

ボーンチャイナ	24613

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2246660">ボーンチャイナ</xref>

G n-grams: 2187

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ファイン・ボーン・チャイナ</reb>

Daijisen

daij
G n-grams: 135

@@ -12 +12,3 @@
-<gloss>death</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1571750">薨去</xref>
+<misc>&obsc;</misc>
+<gloss>death (of a nobleman)</gloss>

daijs, daijr, koj

Daijr: （ 名 ） スル

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<pos>&vs;</pos>

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>restraint, containment</gloss>
+<gloss>restraint</gloss>
+<gloss>containment</gloss>

daijs, daijr, koj

ＫＯＤ追加語彙, リーダーズ+プラス, Unidic

As so often happens, all my EJs and Unidic have it, but the kokugos and JEs don't.

alc https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=迫石&ref=wl
hyper english https://ejje.weblio.jp/content/迫石
世界大百科事典 https://kotobank.jp/word/迫石-1352555

Adding spec1
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

GG5.

Split from 2306160. Better label needed.

@@ -9 +9,6 @@
-<gloss>Soho (Britain)</gloss>
+<gloss>Soho (London, New York, etc.)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<misc>&product;</misc>
+<gloss>Solar and Heliospheric Observatory</gloss>
+<gloss>SOHO</gloss>

Adding spec1
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

I did get this word from daijs rather than in the wild. THat said I do find some references to it in Japanese:

"さらにそこから「ジャッピー（ヤッピーの日本版）」といった語が派生した例もある" 
https://www.kwansei.ac.jp/s_sociology/attached/5054_42926_ref.pdf

"ジャッピー―きみは大人になれるか (MEN’S CLUB BOOKS No. 55)" (the picture shows the cover also adorned with the words "Juppie = Japan 
+ Yuppie")
https://www.amazon.co.jp/ジャッピー―きみは大人�
%AB%E3%81%AA%E3%82%8C%E3%82%8B%E3%81%8B-MEN%E2%80%99S-CLUB-BOOKS-No/dp/4573300554

The first example is a reference to the book on amazon though, so it's pretty sparse. So I agree this is fine in JMDICT. It 
doesn't seem to be a company, though. Just a brand of  因幡電機産業.

@@ -11,4 +10,0 @@
-<sense>
-<misc>&company;</misc>
-<gloss>Jappy</gloss>
-</sense>

Then there's the ngram count. WWW images are almost all cute yellow toys with big ears, or 
electrical connectors or tape.
It seems to be a product and a company. I think this can be pushed to the name dictionary.

@@ -1,3 +1,2 @@
-<ent_seq>2841508</ent_seq>
-<ent_corp>jmdict</ent_corp>
+<ent_corp>jmnedict</ent_corp>
@@ -8,4 +7,6 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<misc>&col;</misc>
-<lsource ls_wasei="y">juppy</lsource>
-<gloss>Japanese yuppy (who is working overseas)</gloss>
+<misc>&product;</misc>
+<gloss>Jappy</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<misc>&company;</misc>
+<gloss>Jappy</gloss>

https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=hsRISNLSSHAC&pg=PT1001&dq=juppie
https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=XXQqCAWcZ8cC&pg=PA225&dq=juppie
https://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q10456255
"「ジャッピー」って、アメリカ人が普通に使っている差別用語みたいですか（苦笑）、"JUPPIE = JAPAN + YUPPIE"で、「日本版ヤッピー」を表わす造語だそうです。"

I was able to find some references to the word "Juppie" in English-language books, showing it wasn't coined in Japan. But I can't find a single Japanese example. Nothing at all. Even "ジャッピー ヤッピー" doesn't return anything (expect a couple of mentions where it's described as an English word).
In the 知恵袋 link above, someone asks about the word's meaning after hearing an American say it and the people responding assume it's a slur.
It doesn't appear to be a Japanese word. Daijs is the only kokugo that has it. It's not even mentioned in the ヤッピー Wikipedia article.
I don't think we should have it as an entry.

リーダーズ+プラス: Jup･py, Jup･pie 
━n. 《口》 ジャッピー《日本人ヤッピー; cf. Yuppie》.
JST

Not sure it's wasei as such.
I'm having trouble finding it used in that sense, but I'm prepared to go with Daijisen and RP.

@@ -10 +10 @@
-<lsource ls_wasei="y">jappie</lsource>
+<lsource ls_wasei="y">juppy</lsource>