@@ -15,0 +16,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1501470">複利</xref>
+<field>&finc;</field>

@@ -11,0 +12,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1827890">複利法</xref>
+<field>&finc;</field>

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1418030">単利</xref>

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<field>&finc;</field>

I don't think an x-ref is necessary here. This is a really common word and もしもの時 accounts for a pretty small (~3%) proportion of its use.

@@ -14 +13,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2841458">もしもの時・もしものとき</xref>

Daijr: 「もし」を強めた言い方。多く、好ましくない事態を仮定する場合に用いる。 
GG5: points to もし.

Aligning basic gloss with もし. The added note is really important for understanding the term.

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2841458">もしもの時・もしものとき</xref>
@@ -14,0 +16 @@
+<s_inf>emph. form of 若し, often in unfavorable situations</s_inf>
@@ -15,0 +18,2 @@
+<gloss>in case</gloss>
+<gloss>supposing</gloss>

@@ -14,0 +14,1 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

OK

shinmeikai
む し【無私】
－な
情実にひかれて判断･処置を誤ることが無い様子だ。「公平無私な態度」

based on those n-grams and the kokugos, i think the -na is probably worth recording as second to adj-no

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>

GG5 (noun glosses, 無私の sub-entry), 中辞典 & ルミナス (adjective glosses only), Daijr "（ 名 ・形動 ） ［文］ ナリ"
無私	38387
無私は	253
無私が	145
無私な	1948
無私の	14188
無私と	1153
無私さ	106
無私に	1594

Those low は/が counts are a good sign it's rarely used as a noun. Although Daijirin has its usual "ナリ", the masses are mostly using の.
GG5 has a 無私性 entry, but it only gets 77 in the n-grams.

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -17,3 +17,3 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<gloss>selflessness</gloss>
-<gloss>unselfishness</gloss>
+<gloss>unselfish</gloss>
+<gloss>selfless</gloss>
+<gloss>disinterested</gloss>

GG5

Consistent PoS for glosses.

@@ -19 +19 @@
-<gloss>unselfish</gloss>
+<gloss>unselfishness</gloss>

beginninglessnessって

koj, daij, shinmeikai, ddofbud

@@ -12 +12,7 @@
-<gloss>the remote beginnings</gloss>
+<field>&Buddh;</field>
+<gloss>beginninglessness</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&arch;</misc>
+<gloss>distant past</gloss>

re whether it's needed, the translation might be obvious but it's in multiple kokugo dictionaries

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1418050">単利法</xref>

nto sure this is needed

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&finc;</field>

遠い昔	245357
遠い昔の	106379
GG5 (昔 entry): 遠い昔 the far past; the far-off days.
Heaps of Eijiro entries. 1 Tanaka sentence.
Hudson's "Far Away and Long Ago" is "はるかな国,遠い昔" in Japanese.

I think it can stay.

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

is this entry from the 'crap range' really needed?

clearly this is common, but we generally don't keep adj+n entries when the meaning is obvious...遠い昔 = distant past is pretty clear...

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
@@ -12,0 +14,2 @@
+<gloss>far ago</gloss>
+<gloss>time immemorial</gloss>

OK. Indexed now.

Reopen.

Since we're tagging it as "exp" I think the "to", etc. should be included fully.
There are ~140 sentences using this. I'd like to set up examples for each sense, so I;ll approve and then reopen.

@@ -14,2 +14,2 @@
-<gloss>(to) anyone</gloss>
-<gloss>(to) everyone</gloss>
+<gloss>to anyone</gloss>
+<gloss>to everyone</gloss>
@@ -19,2 +19,2 @@
-<gloss>(by) anyone</gloss>
-<gloss>(by) everyone</gloss>
+<gloss>by anyone</gloss>
+<gloss>by everyone</gloss>
@@ -24,2 +24,2 @@
-<gloss>(in) everyone</gloss>
-<gloss>(in) anyone</gloss>
+<gloss>in everyone</gloss>
+<gloss>in anyone</gloss>

Should the to's, by's, and in's really be in brackets, when they're all what's differentiating the different senses?

Sense 1 examples:
だれにも言うなよ - don't say it *to* anyone
誰にも明白だ - it's clear *to* everyone
Sense 2 examples:
誰にも止められない - can't be stopped *by* anyone
誰にも気付かれずに - unnoticed *by* everyone
誰にもできる仕事 - job that can be done *by* anyone
Sense 3 examples:
誰にも夢がある - everyone has dreams / [lit] there are dreams *in* everyone
誰にも過ちがある - everyone makes mistakes / [lit] there are mistakes *in* everyone

I'd like to suggest splitting the senses according to the uses of に, so that each sense has a different meaning. "Anyone" can appear in positive sentences so I don't think a positive/negative split is the way to go.
For this proposed split to work, we'd need example sentences indexed for each sense, but I think this approach is ultimately clearer.
I should note that even with this split, a single sense may contain multiple meanings of に.

@@ -14,2 +14 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1416860">誰も・1</xref>
-<s_inf>effectively 誰も with に</s_inf>
+<gloss>(to) anyone</gloss>
@@ -16,0 +16,4 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<gloss>(by) anyone</gloss>
@@ -21,5 +24,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1416860">誰も・2</xref>
-<s_inf>with neg. verb</s_inf>
-<gloss>(to) anyone</gloss>
-<gloss>(by) anyone</gloss>
-<gloss>(to) none</gloss>
+<gloss>(in) everyone</gloss>
+<gloss>(in) anyone</gloss>

https://help.salesforce.com/s/articleView?id=sf.relationships_manytomany.htm&type=5

Also used with relational databases.

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<field>&comp;</field>

Style alignment.
I don't think the x-ref is needed (unless we also want to add one for 一対一).

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -12,2 +13 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="2462480">一対多</xref>
+<field>&math;</field>

No-one is responding to this. I think it's better out of the way.

GG5 (at the end of the する entry): …にすれば, …にしたら, …にしてみれば, …にしたって 〔…にとっては〕 from one's point of view; as far as one is concerned; to…; for….
にすれば	2331798 <- 17 Tanaka sentences
にしたら	1815757 <- 10
にしてみれば	414156 <- 0
にしたって	270999 <- 0

The trouble with these sorts of expressions is they have other more-common meanings. Only one or two of the 27 Tanaka sentences mentioned above seem to apply. Very difficult to get a useful entry from them.

daijirin https://kotobank.jp/word/したって-282744

I glanced at the leading WWW pages, and not surprisingly they were mostly people offering staff induction/training courses. I don't think it's useful - if it had 8,000 n-grams maybe, but 80?

新入社員 【しんにゅうしゃいん】 (n,adj-no) new employee; freshman employee; new hire
訓練(P); 訓連(iK) 【くんれん】 (n,vs) training; drill; practice; discipline; (P)
If it's simply the sum of the parts it's not needed. If it actually goes beyond that, e.g. 
Scott's third gloss, perhaps it is suitable. I'd like to see more detailed reference 
support.

Long time no see.

This term gets 80 ngrams and there are already entries for 新入社員 and 訓練, so i think it is probably not needed.

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>

Doing Business with Japan ©2000 pg. 34

GG5: もしもの時 《in》 an emergency.
2 Tanaka sentences (both say rainy day")
もしものとき	43039
もしもの時	115865
若しものとき	< 20
若しもの時	80

Not obvious from the parts.

Daijr, GG5, 中辞典, etc. 
蒸しタオル	54513

koj, daij, oubunsha zen'yaku kogo jiten

ddofbud entry appears to be crap on this one

koj, shinmeikai, ddofbud, gg5

Looks fine.

How about this?

@@ -10 +10 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">mythical creature with a lion's head and the body of a fish and the official mascot of Singapore</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">official mascot of Singapore, depicted as a mythical creature with a lion's head and the body of a fish</gloss>

i don't see why it would be any odder in an expl gloss than in a regular gloss

but with the parentheses it actually makes sense. the current version reads as if it has the combined body of a fish and of the official mascot of singapore.

I think the brackets/clarification thing 
looks weird inside of an expl

@@ -10 +10 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">mythical creature with a lion's head and the body of a fish (the official mascot of Singapore)</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">mythical creature with a lion's head and the body of a fish and the official mascot of Singapore</gloss>

although we do capitalize that sense of Hydra

@@ -9 +9 @@
-<gloss>merlion</gloss>
+<gloss>Merlion</gloss>