probably not

Deleting the JMnedict version. Is this needed?

GG5

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
借家住まい 7432
借屋住居	No matches

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>借家住まい</keb>
+</k_ele>

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>time in lieu</gloss>

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>

GG5 daijr koj

add explain (compensate for what?)

@@ -12,1 +12,1 @@
-<gloss>compensatory holiday</gloss>
+<gloss>compensatory holiday (for working on a day off)</gloss>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

gg5
daijr: "人に会うこと。「病室で―する」「―人」"

None of the refs have more than one sense. How about this?

@@ -19,0 +20,2 @@
+<gloss>seeing</gloss>
+<gloss>visit</gloss>
@@ -22,5 +23,0 @@
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<pos>&vs;</pos>
-<gloss>visiting (somebody who is in the hospital)</gloss>
-</sense>

eij
see also 面会室 entry in this dictionary

@@ -19 +18,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -22,0 +22,5 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<gloss>visiting (somebody who is in the hospital)</gloss>
+</sense>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーー─┬─────────────╮
│ 三　 │  59,735,330 │
│ 参　 │   1,243,501 │
│ 參　 │      11,975 │ - add, oK
│ 弎　 │           0 │ - oK
│ さん │ 520,413,466 │
│ み　 │ 176,120,310 │
╰─ーー─┴─────────────╯

@@ -16,0 +17,4 @@
+<keb>參</keb>
+<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -17,0 +22 @@
+<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>

Agreed.

I don't think the pref sense is needed. 七 is the only other numeral entry that has one.

@@ -34,4 +33,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&pref;</pos>
-<gloss>tri-</gloss>

aligning (see the 九 entry)

@@ -32,0 +33 @@
+<gloss>3</gloss>

swap sense order

@@ -20,7 +19,0 @@
-<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<s_inf>pronounced ずまい as a suffix</s_inf>
-<gloss>living</gloss>
-<gloss>life</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
@@ -34,0 +28,7 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<s_inf>pronounced ずまい as a suffix</s_inf>
+<gloss>living</gloss>
+<gloss>life</gloss>
+</sense>

koj, daij, meikyo, shinmeikai

these shouldn't be merged

住居 is ateji for 住い but the only real headword for じゅうきょ.  and じゅうきょ is vs but すまい is not.  すまい has an additional meaning, etc.

many (but not all) sources have 住居 as applying to sense 2 only, which would make sense

@@ -9,4 +9 @@
-<keb>住居</keb>
-<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>
-<ke_pri>news1</ke_pri>
-<ke_pri>nf08</ke_pri>
+<keb>住い</keb>
@@ -15 +12,2 @@
-<keb>住い</keb>
+<keb>住居</keb>
+<ke_inf>&ateji;</ke_inf>
@@ -21,7 +19,7 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>じゅうきょ</reb>
-<re_restr>住居</re_restr>
-<re_pri>ichi1</re_pri>
-<re_pri>news1</re_pri>
-<re_pri>nf08</re_pri>
-</r_ele>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<s_inf>pronounced ずまい as a suffix</s_inf>
+<gloss>living</gloss>
+<gloss>life</gloss>
+</sense>
@@ -30 +28,2 @@
-<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2841455">住居・じゅうきょ</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2841455">住居・じゅうきょ</xref>

N-grams

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<keb>卌</keb>
+<keb>四拾</keb>
@@ -20 +20 @@
-<keb>四拾</keb>
+<keb>卌</keb>

https://www.benricho.org/kanji/kansuji.html

@@ -17,0 +18,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>四拾</keb>

From rejected 2841311.

@@ -14,0 +15,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>卌</keb>

@@ -3,0 +4,4 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>４０</keb>
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
+</k_ele>
@@ -8,0 +13,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>四〇</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -12,0 +20 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>
@@ -22 +30 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&num;</pos>
@@ -23,0 +32 @@
+<gloss>40</gloss>

It would be handy to have these for text-glossing purposes, so I've added all 12 versions of each to the "specials" glossing dictionary. That's where I also have precomposed things 第五次, 第八部, ３種類, the numbers １-１００, etc.

we have entries for 1, 2, and 9 but no other number.  an entry for かげつ already exists.  generally we keep the entry for 1+counter and nuke the rest unless there's a specific reason to keep them.  i see no reason to have 2 and 9 but no other number

since it's in GG5, rK is prob better than iK (now that we have that tag)

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -20,0 +21 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

好走	148298
巧走	146
攻守	247577
巧守	793
https://iss.ndl.go.jp/books/R100000002-I000001971936-00  (巧守巧走列伝)
https://www.amazon.com/巧守巧走列伝_プロ野球不滅のヒーローたち-文春文庫_ビジュアル版/dp/4168116069
https://www.nikkansports.com/baseball/news/p-bb-tp0-20140707-1330234.html

It seems to be a baseball thing. I can see other 巧 substitutions, e.g. this 攻守->巧守 one. And it's in the name of the book.
I think it had better stay. Next time I'm in touch with my Kenkyusha contact I'll ask; it may be some sort of joke.
好走 seems to be only used in sports, especially baseball. You wouldn't use it for a car running well.

@@ -20,0 +21 @@
+<field>&sports;</field>

好走する	12933
巧走する	No matches

If it were common, I wouldn't have an issue with it, but this is so obscure that it's probably not even worth keeping. I think it's iK at the very least, and I'd rather we dropped it entirely.

reopen.

i'm not opposed to deleting it, but in the past i think we have generally kept gg5 headwords (and not marked them as iK unless there is strong reason to do so)

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>

Trying to make sense 2 a little clearer.

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<pos>&adv;</pos>
@@ -21,2 +20,3 @@
-<s_inf>in the form 〜をいかんせん</s_inf>
-<gloss>it cannot be helped</gloss>
+<s_inf>as 〜をいかんせん</s_inf>
+<gloss>what can be done about ...</gloss>
+<gloss>... cannot be helped</gloss>

Seems to work.

daij, gg5

Splitting.
I'm not sure about sense 2.
A more literal gloss would be something like "what do I do about ...?"

@@ -14 +13,0 @@
-<gloss>can't be helped</gloss>
@@ -15,0 +15,8 @@
+<gloss>regrettably</gloss>
+<gloss>unfortunately</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<s_inf>in the form 〜をいかんせん</s_inf>
+<gloss>it cannot be helped</gloss>

Yes, about 3:1 in the Google ngrams.

wiki
https://ja.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/30時間制
photos of real-life usage
https://twitter.com/r1_nakagawa/status/1415972778583289858

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -20,0 +22 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -23,0 +26 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -38,0 +42,7 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<stagk>３０</stagk>
+<pos>&num;</pos>
+<misc>&col;</misc>
+<s_inf>as 30時, 30:00, etc.</s_inf>
+<gloss>6am</gloss>

Well, no-one is concerned enough to comment, so I'll wave it through.

卅	5103
丗	927
参拾	11705

I can't help feeling that 参拾, 卅 and 丗, while correct in meaning and reading, clutter thin entry a bit. I wonder if it would be cleaner to move them, and the equivalents in other number entries, into a separate entry with an annotation saying they are mainly used in historical and legal contexts.

@@ -13,0 +14,6 @@
+<keb>三〇</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>参拾</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -17,3 +22,0 @@
-<keb>三〇</keb>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
@@ -21,3 +23,0 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>参拾</keb>

https://www.benricho.org/kanji/kansuji.html

@@ -18,0 +19,6 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>丗</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>参拾</keb>
+</k_ele>

meant to type "are valid headwords in daijisen (though not daijirin)".

exp -> adv according to all dicts

決って is in shinmeikai, daijs

marking 決って as [io] because we have 決る as [io], but 決って, 決る, etc. are valid headwords in daijirin (though not daijisen).  i'd guess they're probably [io]

@@ -11,0 +12,4 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>決って</keb>
+<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
@@ -18 +22 @@
-<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>

https://kotobank.jp/word/決って-475688#E3.83.87.E3.82.B8.E3.82.BF.E3.83.AB.E5.A4.A7.E8.BE.9E.E6.B3.89

@@ -7,0 +8,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>極まって</keb>
@@ -17,0 +21 @@
+<gloss>invariably</gloss>

seems a little sketchy to combine the pos, yes

エコ	6209916
エコな	154491
エコの	73764

Not really 2 senses. Wouldn't normally combine these pos, but it seems best here.

@@ -7,0 +8 @@
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
@@ -9 +10 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1028390">エコロジー</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2484040">エコロジカル</xref>
@@ -10,0 +12 @@
+<gloss>ecological</gloss>
@@ -13,4 +14,0 @@
-<sense>
-<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
-<gloss>ecological</gloss>
-</sense>

GG5; digital daijs (https://kotobank.jp/word/エコ-444377)

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&pref;</pos>
@@ -11 +11 @@
-<gloss>ecology</gloss>
+<gloss>eco-</gloss>

@@ -13,0 +13,4 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
+<gloss>ecological</gloss>
+</sense>

Should have picked that up years ago.

gg5

merge

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>独り住まい</keb>
@@ -12,0 +16 @@
+<gloss>living alone</gloss>

Entry created

we have entries for 1, 2, and 9 but no other number.  an entry for かげつ already exists.  generally we keep the entry for 1+counter and nuke the rest unless there's a specific reason to keep them.  i see no reason to have 2 and 9 but no other number

@@ -5,0 +6,15 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>二ヵ月</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>二カ月</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>二か月</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>二箇月</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>二ケ月</keb>

Entry created

not sure.  poss sense 1

中辞典(見境 entry) - 見境がつかない cannot tell [distinguish] one thing from another; cannot 
distinguish [tell the difference between] one thing and another
見境がつかない	511
見境が付かない	57

Suggested by a correspondent. Not very common, but meaning not obvious. Not sure I have 
the right sense for 付く.

https://kotobank.jp/word/経営家族主義-58555 (ブリタニカ)
https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jsr1950/11/1/11_1_2/_article/-char/ja/
http://www.adv-keiei.com/book030406.html

I think it gets enough use as a formal phrase to include.

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>paternalistic management</gloss>

経営 and 家族主義 are already entries.  with only 269 ngrams and it not even appearing in eijiro, etc. i'm on the fence about this one.

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>management familism, family management style organizational philosophy</gloss>
+<gloss>management familism</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">family management style organizational philosophy</gloss>

"The Other Workers", ©1968, pg. 104, "Honolulu East West Center Press", Whitehall, Arthur M., Takezawa Shin-ichi

Doing Business with Japan, ©2000, pg. 32, University of Hawai'i Press, Kazuo Nishiyama

企業経営のあり方に家族主義を持込む形でなされる経営方針をいう。社会学におけるこの理論は，日本農村社会の基幹を形成した家と同族の理論より展開されたものである。この「家」的労働組織の維持管理の方式を資本の
論理の人間関係的表現のうちに見出し，日本の賃労働者が同族ないし家連合を基盤とする共同体的村落から析出されてきたことを重視し，家制度が最も強く行われてきた商家や豪農層の出身者である資本家や経営者自身の
もっていた生活態度が，経営の基本方針として表われているとする。これは，家制度に規定された企業経営の現実的表われ方であり，経営イデオロギーの歴史的一形態である。企業という機能集団を家集団との類比としてと
らえ，資本家，経営者と労働者との階級関係を家における親子という身分関係に転置させるとともに，終身雇用体系のもとで福利厚生までを企業が包含して運命共同体的雰囲気をつくり上げるのが経営家族主義の論理であ
る。

Fork

決まる	2216938
キマる	44336

I don't think it's needed either. The hits for キマっている are 0.2% of those for 決まっている. We don't have キマる, which is far more common.

Is it really? You can probably get
more hits for タベる

決まっている	1206145
決っている	8134
キマっている	2641

Worth mentioning.

@@ -12,0 +13,4 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>キマっている</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>

https://nativecamp.net/heync/question/12447
https://context.reverso.net/翻訳/日本語-英語/嘘に決まってるじゃん

encountered as 'kimatte iru ja nai ka' (so without the 'ni'), translated by native friend as 'isn't it obvious?'

@@ -20,0 +21 @@
+<gloss>it's obvious that ...</gloss>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<reb>きにまっている</reb>
+<reb>にきまっている</reb>

I think that will work. There are 10 sentences linked, but I think they are all for senses 2 are are the に決まっている pattern. I'll fix them.

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>決まっている</keb>
+<keb>に決まっている</keb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<keb>決っている</keb>
+<keb>に決っている</keb>
@@ -12 +12 @@
-<reb>きまっている</reb>
+<reb>きにまっている</reb>
@@ -17,10 +16,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1591420">決まる・きまる・1</xref>
-<gloss>to be fixed</gloss>
-<gloss>to be determined</gloss>
-<gloss>to be common</gloss>
-<gloss>to be destined</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&exp;</pos>
-<pos>&v1;</pos>
-<s_inf>as 〜に決まっている</s_inf>
@@ -31,7 +20,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&exp;</pos>
-<pos>&v1;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="1591420">決まる・4</xref>
-<gloss>to look good (on)</gloss>
-<gloss>to be stylish</gloss>

https://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q1481718309
芯が強い	8825

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>strong-willed</gloss>

weblio https://ejje.weblio.jp/content/芯が強い
EDP https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=芯が強い

Not entirely obvious from its parts; somewhat idiomatic

Thanks.

copied the gloss from ぜに.  at least arch.  maybe arch and obsc

@@ -12 +12,3 @@
-<gloss>zeni coin</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2175880">銭・ぜに・1</xref>
+<misc>&arch;</misc>
+<gloss>round coin with a (square) hole in the center</gloss>

0 n-grams.

I'll consider this further when it has a meaningful English translation added. At present it's useless.

精選版 日本国語大辞典 https://kotobank.jp/word/鵝眼銭-1287784#E7.B2.BE.E9.81.B8.E7.89.88.20.E6.97.A5.E6.9C.AC.E5.9B.BD.E8.AA.9E.E5.A4.A7.E8.BE.9E.E5.85.B8

Capital is not needed.

I don't think this is a proverb.
Should "sensei" be capitalized?

@@ -12,3 +12,3 @@
-<misc>&proverb;</misc>
-<gloss>don't fall for flattery</gloss>
-<gloss g_type="lit">not so stupid that being called sensei (makes one feel good)</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1387990">先生・せんせい・2</xref>
+<gloss>I don't fall for flattery</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="lit">(I'm) not so stupid that being called "sensei" (makes me feel good)</gloss>

I'm not sure what "decree" you are 
referring to. The original translation 
wasn't a proverb, and it's not a literal 
translation of the actual Japanese wording 
either but a literal translation of the 
meaning/explanation given in daijr.

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<gloss g_type="lit">I'm not so stupid that being called sensei makes me feel good</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="lit">not so stupid that being called sensei (makes one feel good)</gloss>

What happened to the 
"let's not freely 
translate proverbs" 
decree?

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<gloss g_type="lit">I'm not so stupid that being called sensei makes me feel good</gloss>

"retirement benefit system" from gg5, eij seems the best gloss.  gg5 also has "retirement system".  eijiro also has "retirement plan" with some seemingly appropriate examples and "retirement package" but they include a note for that and it seems a little sketchy to me.  but my retirement is all handled by the union and i'm terrible with finance so who knows

@@ -12,2 +12,3 @@
-<gloss>Retirement fund system, retirement allowance system, retirement benefit system</gloss>
-<gloss>retirement package</gloss>
+<gloss>retirement benefit system</gloss>
+<gloss>retirement system</gloss>
+<gloss>retirement plan</gloss>

Doing Business with Japan pg. 40 (Kazuo Nishiyama) ©2000 University of Hawai’i Press

Google Japanese to English translate.

meikyo

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

reopen

koj, daij, meikyo, shinmeikai, etc.

split out of 1595750.  approving for xref

koj, daij

OK

"(e.g. in history)" seems very confusing to me. I get where it's from looking at GG5 歴史にイフはありえない and daijr 「歴史に―はない」 but I don't think this wording works. The jump from "there are no what-ifs in history" (which doesn't even appear to be an established expression in English?" to "(an) if (e.g. in history)" is too wide.

@@ -9 +9,2 @@
-<gloss>(an) if (e.g. in history)</gloss>
+<gloss>(an) if</gloss>
+<gloss>what-if</gloss>

This is used quite differently to もし so I don't think the x-ref is necessary.

@@ -9 +8,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1012500">若し・もし</xref>

gakken katakana also, though it doesn't specify pos

イフ
if
もし．もしも．

Daijr: 「もし」「もしも」の意。 「歴史に−はない」 
GG5: 〔もしも〕 an “if”.

Seems to be a noun only.

Removing the numeral + 区/丁目 entries.

Removing the numeral + 区/丁目 entries.

Removing the numeral + 区/丁目 entries.

Removing the numeral + 区/丁目 entries.

Removing the numeral + 区/丁目 entries.

Removing the numeral + 区/丁目 entries.

Removing the numeral + 区/丁目 entries.

Removing the numeral + 区/丁目 entries.

Removing the numeral + 区/丁目 entries.

Removing the numeral + 区/丁目 entries.

I'll delete all of the following. I doubt any of the "s" tags are actually valid.
一区 [いっく] /(p) Ikku/
二区 [にく] /(p) Niku/
三区 [さんく] /(p) Sanku/
四区 [よんく] /(p) Yonku/
西区 [にしく] /(p) Nishiku/
五区 [ごく] /(p) Goku/
七区 [しちく] /(p) Shichiku/
十区 [じっく] /(p) Jikku/
一丁目 [いっちょうめ] /(p) Icchoume/
二丁目 [にちょうめ] /(p) Nichoume/
三丁目 [さんちょうめ] /(p,s) Sanchoume/
四丁目 [よんちょうめ] /(p) Yonchoume/
六丁目 [ろくちょうのめ] /(p) Rokuchounome/
六丁目 [ろくちょうめ] /(p) Rokuchoume/
八丁目 [はっちょうめ] /(p,s) Hacchoume/
十二丁目 [じゅうにちょうめ] /(p) Juunichoume/

i agree with Jim.  i think it would have to be an iconic place such as Fifth Avenue for this to qualify as an entry.  if 二区 is not referring to a *specific* place, then i don't think it really qualifies as a [place] at all.  for it to qualify as a [place], you would need a separate [place] sense for each notable instance that we wish to include in the dictionary.  but wikipedia has no entry for 二区, suggesting that there is no one [place] that is notable enough to be recorded as 二区.

i would suggest deleting this entry entirely, but surely there are a bunch of these other numbered entries in enamdict, and deleting this might result in weird inconsistency...  i suggest just rejecting for now.  mass deletion of 区s (etc.) can probably be more consistently handled in a batch

I did a quick search on Wikipedia and found quite a few Chinese municipalities with districts in the style of 一区、二区
https://ja.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?search=二区&title=特別:検索&fulltext=1&ns0=1

Along with 一区, 五区, 三区, 七区, 十区, etc. I don't think these are specific places. The same goes for 一町目, etc.
I could be wrong - "Fifth Avenue" is a place.
My inclination is to drop the N区, N町目, etc. entries.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tokyo_2nd_district

Is this useful?

@@ -12,0 +13,2 @@
+<gloss>Second Ward</gloss>
+<gloss>Second District</gloss>

Removing the numeral + 区/丁目 entries.

Removing the numeral + 区/丁目 entries.

Removing the numeral + 区/丁目 entries.

Removing the numeral + 区/丁目 entries.