GG5

Yes, it should. I'll do that.

@@ -13,6 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>scull (boat)</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<stagr>スカル</stagr>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>skull</gloss>
+<gloss>scull</gloss>
+<gloss>sculling boat</gloss>

Jim, according to the new way we deal with 外来語, sense 2 should be a separate entry right?

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<stagr>スカル</stagr>

digital daijs (https://kotobank.jp/word/スカル-83457#E3.83.87.E3.82.B8.E3.82.BF.E3.83.AB.E5.A4.A7.E8.BE.9E.E6.B3.89)

@@ -14,0 +15,4 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>skull</gloss>
+</sense>

I think sense 2 is fine without the x-ref.
The vast majority of hits for ストリー are unrelated to this meaning. I don't think we need it.

@@ -11,3 +10,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>ストリー</reb>
-</r_ele>
@@ -22 +18,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2817540">ストーリー性</xref>

Daijr, etc. FB discussion on ストーリー性

Several references split senses.

@@ -16,0 +17,9 @@
+<gloss>tale</gloss>
+<gloss>legend</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2817540">ストーリー性</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2817540">ストーリー性</xref>
+<gloss>plot</gloss>
+<gloss>storyline</gloss>

ストーリー	9767108
ストリー	29421
ストーリ	157441

@@ -10,0 +11,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ストリー</reb>
+</r_ele>

G n-grams:
下顎	143166
下あご	36384

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>下あご</keb>
@@ -11,0 +15 @@
+<re_restr>下顎</re_restr>

gg5

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>かがく</reb>
+<reb>したあご</reb>
@@ -11 +11 @@
-<reb>したあご</reb>
+<reb>かがく</reb>
@@ -15 +14,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -16,0 +16 @@
+<gloss>mandible</gloss>

I think I misintepreted the entry in 新英和中辞典. Thanks for the correction!

I can't see it.

@@ -51 +51 @@
-<gloss>barb (of an arrowhead, fish hook, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>barb (of a fishhook)</gloss>

G n-grams:
顎	1313492
あご	888772
顎を	123395
あごを	94811

Where are you seeing "arrowhead"? Daijs says "釣り針の先に逆向きにつけた返しのこと"
Doesn't appear to be uk.

@@ -46,2 +46 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>jaw</gloss>
@@ -49 +47,0 @@
-<gloss>jaw</gloss>
@@ -53 +50,0 @@
-<misc>&uk;</misc>

新英和中辞典, daijs

@@ -50,0 +51,5 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>barb (of an arrowhead, fish hook, etc.)</gloss>
+</sense>

gg5, daij

I don't think we have to qualify "vision". "視力" and "eyesight"/"vision" are used in exactly the same way.

@@ -18 +17,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -20 +19 @@
-<gloss>(sharpness of) vision</gloss>
+<gloss>vision</gloss>

Chuujiten

@@ -19,0 +20,2 @@
+<gloss>(sharpness of) vision</gloss>
+<gloss>visual acuity</gloss>

gg5, prog, daij

@@ -19,0 +20 @@
+<gloss>tanned</gloss>

based on examples in 新英和中辞典 and eij

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<gloss>darkish</gloss>
+<gloss>dark (skin, complexion, etc.)</gloss>

大辞林３
明鏡

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
かき回す	37106
掻き回す	10413
掻きまわす	391
搔き回す	No matches

@@ -9,0 +10,7 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>掻きまわす</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>搔き回す</keb>
+<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>

掻き回す	10413
かき回す	37106

@@ -5,2 +5 @@
-<keb>掻き回す</keb>
-<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>
+<keb>かき回す</keb>
@@ -9 +8,2 @@
-<keb>かき回す</keb>
+<keb>掻き回す</keb>
+<ke_pri>ichi2</ke_pri>
@@ -13 +13 @@
-<re_pri>ichi1</re_pri>
+<re_pri>ichi2</re_pri>

gg5, prog, daij

Splitting into senses.

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<gloss>to stir up</gloss>
+<gloss>to stir</gloss>
@@ -20 +20,13 @@
-<gloss>to ransack</gloss>
+<gloss>to poke (a fire)</gloss>
+<gloss>to disturb (water)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5s;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>to rummage around</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5s;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>to throw into confusion</gloss>
+<gloss>to throw into chaos</gloss>

Aligning with the other 3 radical glosses.

@@ -48 +48 @@
-<gloss>bottom structural component (i.e. radical) of a kanji</gloss>
+<gloss>lower radical of a kanji</gloss>

meikyo: 《多く「お━」の形で》ぜに。→お足

@@ -34 +34 @@
-<s_inf>esp. 脚,肢</s_inf>
+<s_inf>esp. 脚, 肢</s_inf>
@@ -59 +59,2 @@
-<misc>&arch;</misc>
+<misc>&col;</misc>
+<s_inf>usu お〜</s_inf>

G n-grams:
大層	179753
大そう	42946

Thank you for the correction.

@@ -35 +35 @@
-<gloss>splended</gloss>
+<gloss>splendid</gloss>

Saw this spelling in むらさきのスカートの女 
(akutagawa-sho winner).

@@ -6,0 +7,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>大そう</keb>

gg5, prog, daijr/s

Redid entry.
All the refs divide the senses differently but I liked Daijs's approach the best.

@@ -12,0 +13,9 @@
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>very</gloss>
+<gloss>extremely</gloss>
+<gloss>exceedingly</gloss>
+<gloss>greatly</gloss>
+<gloss>terribly</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
@@ -14,2 +22,0 @@
-<pos>&adv;</pos>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -17 +24,16 @@
-<gloss>very much</gloss>
+<gloss>extreme</gloss>
+<gloss>excessive</gloss>
+<gloss>great many</gloss>
+<gloss>large number of</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>splended</gloss>
+<gloss>impressive</gloss>
+<gloss>tremendous</gloss>
+<gloss>immense</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -19 +40,0 @@
-<gloss>very fine</gloss>

gg5, daij

@@ -21,0 +22,6 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1956150">訓・くん・1</xref>
+<s_inf>also written 訓み</s_inf>
+<gloss>reading (of a kanji, esp. kun reading)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -25,0 +32,2 @@
+<gloss>prediction</gloss>
+<gloss>calculation</gloss>

新和英中辞典, eij
読みが   	208606
読みが深い	2833
読みが浅い	3683

読みが深い・読みが浅い may deserve their own entries.

@@ -19,0 +20,7 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>reading (e.g. of a situation)</gloss>
+<gloss>insight</gloss>
+<gloss>judgment</gloss>
+<gloss>interpretation</gloss>
+</sense>

I'll let go of it, but I just hope we're not obscuring the fact that 溶ける is the most common term for melting/thawing, etc. and that 解ける. while almost as common, usually is not used in the melt/thaw sense.

G n-grams:
雪が溶けた	3739
雪が解けた	3936
氷が溶けた	3180
氷が解けた	1279

解ける is very commonly used for snow and ice. I think it does belong in this entry. I note that one of my JEs (ウィズダム和英辞典) uses 解ける exclusively for snow/ice examples.
I see your point regarding the note. What I want to say is "解ける is only used for snow/ice" (as opposed to "only 解ける is used for snow/ice"). The same applies to 熔ける and 鎔ける. Does the note look odd with "only" in it?
Maybe it would be worth adding a sense (or entry-wide) element specifically for this information (as part of the upcoming upgrades to JMdict). The kokugos often have notes at the bottom of entries explaining kanji usage.

@@ -27 +27 @@
-<s_inf>熔ける, 鎔ける used for metals; 解ける for ice or snow</s_inf>
+<s_inf>熔ける, 鎔ける only used for metals; 解ける only used for ice and snow</s_inf>

No problem with the sense split, but I really wonder if adding 解ける to this entry is appropriate. 解ける/とける is in another entry with quite a different set of meanings. That entry has "to melt" as the 4th sense, but it's not in most references, and I'm struggling to find a current example. I suspect it's probably better to leave it out of this entry and just have it as a sense in 解ける/とける, perhaps with an "esp. ice or snow" note.
Also, the comment "熔ける, 鎔ける used for metals; 解ける for ice or snow" seems a little misleading, as 溶ける is the most common form used for ice and snow. All of the GG5 examples mentioning them use 溶ける and most of the 23 Tanaka sentences for this verb use 溶ける and refer to ice or snow.

gg5, prog, daij

Both daijr and daijs have 解ける for this sense. Meikyo notes: "雪や氷の場合は「解ける」とも。" Adding it to kanji field. 
Splitting into senses. Might be worth tagging sentences.

@@ -9,0 +10,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>解ける</keb>
@@ -24 +27 @@
-<s_inf>解ける is sometimes used also</s_inf>
+<s_inf>熔ける, 鎔ける used for metals; 解ける for ice or snow</s_inf>
@@ -27,0 +31,4 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

I agree. Not a separate sense.

I suspect it's sense 2 being used in a rather idiomatic way. I can't see that that quote by itself is enough to support a new sense. I haven't been able to identify the pattern elsewhere,

Seemingly used to mean "mistress" in the 
book むらさきのスカートの女:
"所長のコレがいた場所は一発でわかるわ。臭いから！"
(referring the titular character who is 
secretly dating her boss and wearing a 
strong perfume)

I think they're adverbs.

@@ -44 +44 @@
-<pos>&pn;</pos>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
@@ -58 +58 @@
-<pos>&pn;</pos>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>

Should senses 3 and 6 really be pn?

大辞林３
明鏡

@@ -11,0 +12,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>引っ搔き回す</keb>
+<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>

gg5, prog, daij
G n-grams:
引っ掻き回す	7425
引っかき回す	3288
ひっかき回す	790
引掻き回す	No matches

Dropping 引掻き回す. Not supported by the refs either.
Splitting into senses.

@@ -13,3 +12,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>引掻き回す</keb>
-</k_ele>
@@ -22,3 +19,6 @@
-<gloss>to ransack (a drawer)</gloss>
-<gloss>to rummage</gloss>
-<gloss>to stir up (mud)</gloss>
+<gloss>to rummage through</gloss>
+<gloss>to ransack (e.g. a drawer)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5s;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
@@ -26 +26,3 @@
-<gloss>to tamper with</gloss>
+<gloss>to disrupt</gloss>
+<gloss>to upset</gloss>
+<gloss>to meddle in</gloss>

Encountered this spelling in the PGS for 響け！ユーフォニアム2 and the CCs for ボールルームへようこそ.

@@ -8,0 +9,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ひっかき回す</keb>

gg5

The JEs only have the table leg sense.

@@ -14,0 +15,4 @@
+<gloss>cabriole leg (of a table, chair, etc.)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -18,4 +21,0 @@
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>carved table leg with "ball and claw" foot</gloss>
-</sense>

daijr/s, nikk

@@ -14,0 +15,5 @@
+<gloss>stealthy footsteps</gloss>
+<gloss>walking silently</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>

GG5, https://www.sralab.org/rehabilitation-measures/dynamic-visual-acuity-test-instrumented

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>dynamic vision</gloss>
+<gloss>dynamic visual acuity</gloss>
+<gloss>DVA</gloss>

shinjirin; koj

I'm not sure these glosses are terms in English. I am getting hits for [dynamic|kinetic] "visual acuity", so maybe that's the actual term.

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<gloss g_type="expl">ability to identify objects in motion</gloss>

Entry created

なす術もない	1748	18.1%
為す術もない	1081	11.2%
成す術もない	785	8.1%
なすすべも無い	518	5.4%
為す術も無い	237	2.4%
為すすべもない	369	3.8%
成す術も無い	271	2.8%
成すすべもない	214	2.2%
なすすべもない	4458	46.0%

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -17,0 +19 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -20,0 +23 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -23,0 +27 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -26,0 +31 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

I don't think that spelling variation tagged onto the end is helpful to anyone.

@@ -37 +37 @@
-<gloss>at one's wits' end (wit's)</gloss>
+<gloss>at one's wits' end</gloss>

なす術もない	1748
為す術もない	1081
為すすべもない	369
為す術も無い	237
成す術も無い	271
成すすべもない	214
成す術もない	785
なすすべも無い	518
なすすべもない	4458

I'm definitely at my wits' end with this one.

@@ -11 +11,4 @@
-<keb>為すすべもない</keb>
+<keb>成す術もない</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>なすすべも無い</keb>
@@ -14,0 +18,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>為すすべもない</keb>
@@ -22,3 +27,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>成す術もない</keb>
-</k_ele>
@@ -30,0 +34 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -33,2 +37 @@
-<gloss>at one's wits' end</gloss>
-<gloss>at one's wit's end</gloss>
+<gloss>at one's wits' end (wit's)</gloss>

http://yourei.jp/成す術

more readings; uses the "成" kanji, but is uncommon.

@@ -15,0 +16,9 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>成す術も無い</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>成すすべもない</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>成す術もない</keb>
+</k_ele>

Eij, GG5 examples.

Yes, needs extending.

@@ -21,0 +22,2 @@
+<gloss>having no choice</gloss>
+<gloss>at a loss for what to do</gloss>

@@ -9 +9 @@
-<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<xref type="see" seq="1596910">タコ</xref>
@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>

that's not clear to me

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">second stage air pressure regulator used as an alternative air source in an emergency</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">alternate second-stage air pressure regulator used as an alternative air source in an emergency</gloss>

not versed in diving vocabulary but I reckon the first 'alternate' is redundant

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<gloss>alternate 2nd stage air pressure regulator used as an alternate air source in an emergency</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">second stage air pressure regulator used as an alternative air source in an emergency</gloss>

Entry created

必要不可欠な	304973
必要不可欠の	20597

Don't need so many glosses.
Not a noun.

@@ -11 +10,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -13 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>essential</gloss>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<gloss>absolutely essential</gloss>
@@ -15,3 +14,0 @@
-<gloss>imperative</gloss>
-<gloss>necessary</gloss>
-<gloss>compelling</gloss>

Odd.

@@ -17 +17,3 @@
-<gloss>compelling, vital, critical</gloss>
+<gloss>compelling</gloss>
+<gloss>vital</gloss>
+<gloss>critical</gloss>

Entry created

Revised reading element associations.

@@ -11,0 +12,5 @@
+<re_restr>ストーリー性</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ストーリせい</reb>
+<re_restr>ストーリ性</re_restr>

https://www.linguee.com/japanese-english/translation/ストーリー性.html

I felt the glosses needed to be expanded a little.
I don't think we need ストリー性. Most likely a typo. We don't even have ストリー on the ストーリー entry.

@@ -10,3 +9,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>ストリー性</keb>
-</k_ele>
@@ -17,0 +15,3 @@
+<gloss>(sense of) story</gloss>
+<gloss>(sense of) narrative</gloss>
+<gloss>storytelling (within a work)</gloss>
@@ -20 +19,0 @@
-<gloss>story</gloss>

ストーリー性	115773
ストリー性	646
ストーリ性	2450

FB discussion.

@@ -5,0 +6,6 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ストーリ性</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ストリー性</keb>

Daijr, GG5 (says they're the same)
秋風が吹く	5922
秋風が立つ	542

@@ -12,0 +13,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2841235">秋風が吹く・あきかぜがふく・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2841235">秋風が吹く・あきかぜがふく・1</xref>
@@ -17,0 +20,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2841235">秋風が吹く・あきかぜがふく・2</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2841235">秋風が吹く・あきかぜがふく・2</xref>

daijr/s

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos>

新和英中辞典
悪たれ   	10434	  
悪たれ小僧	1746

daijr

digital daijs (https://kotobank.jp/word/マッスル-11874#E3.83.87.E3.82.B8.E3.82.BF.E3.83.AB.E5.A4.A7.E8.BE.9E.E6.B3.89)

daijr

I don't think we have to specify "body part" for sense 1.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>leg (body part)</gloss>
+<gloss>leg</gloss>
@@ -17,2 +17,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1244120">区間・1</xref>
-<gloss>leg (of a journey, race, etc.)</gloss>
+<field>&sports;</field>
+<gloss>leg (of a race, competition, etc.)</gloss>

daijs, GG5

レグ	82008
レッグ	41743

G n-grams: 6176

@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+<gloss>chin-up (exercise)</gloss>
@@ -11 +11,0 @@
-<gloss>chin-up</gloss>

digital daijs (https://kotobank.jp/word/チンニング-1825609)

daijr

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1450920">頭皮</xref>

digital daijs (https://kotobank.jp/word/スカルプ-540907)

For example, in 「スカルプケア」

@@ -26 +26 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2841242">諦めが悪い</xref>
+<xref type="ant" seq="2841242">諦めが悪い</xref>

諦めがいい	1014
あきらめがいい	619
諦めが良い	589
諦めがよい	261
あきらめがよい	96

Should have the 良い form too.

@@ -6,0 +7,6 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>諦めが良い</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>諦めがよい</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -8,0 +15,7 @@
+<re_restr>諦めがいい</re_restr>
+<re_restr>諦めが良い</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>あきらめがよい</reb>
+<re_restr>諦めが良い</re_restr>
+<re_restr>諦めがよい</re_restr>

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2841242">諦めが悪い</xref>

gg5

@@ -14,3 +14,3 @@
-<gloss>being good at letting things go</gloss>
-<gloss>not fretting over the past</gloss>
-<gloss>having good sportsmanship</gloss>
+<gloss>good at letting things go</gloss>
+<gloss>accepting failure with good grace</gloss>
+<gloss>being a good loser</gloss>

Worth having.
For expressions, we only use verb glosses if the expression ends with a verb.

@@ -13,4 +13,4 @@
-<gloss>to know when to give up</gloss>
-<gloss>to be good at letting things go</gloss>
-<gloss>to not fret over the past</gloss>
-<gloss>to have good sportsmanship</gloss>
+<gloss>knowing when to give up</gloss>
+<gloss>being good at letting things go</gloss>
+<gloss>not fretting over the past</gloss>
+<gloss>having good sportsmanship</gloss>

gg5

https://ejje.weblio.jp/content/目的補語
目的補語	693

gg5, prog

I don't think it's necessary in this case.

@@ -18 +18,2 @@
-<gloss>to be dead tired</gloss>
+<gloss>to be worn out</gloss>
+<gloss>to be done in</gloss>

daijr/s, nikk, 新和英中辞典
顎を出す 	447
あごを出す	999

Should we add the more literal part of the definition "足が思うように動かず、顎だけが出る" too?

Koj, Daijr, ルミナス

Daijr, GG5, JLD
秋風が吹く	5922
秋風が立つ	542

Approving for xrefs, then reopening.

typo

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Kasumigaeki Station</gloss>
+<gloss>Kasumigaseki Station</gloss>

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kasumigaseki_Station