i would pass also.  although possibly it is not a misspelling but an internet slang thing?  (i haven't checked).  if so it might be worth recording, probably in a separate entry

口コミ	12561023
くちコミ	458315
クチコミ	53047280
ロコミ	1573
ろこみ	454

As you can see from those n-gram counts the ロ/ろ versions are minuscule cf the real terms. It would be unwarranted clutter to add them to this entry.
In theory the ロ/ろ versions could go in their own entry with a note about their status, but the editors have been unwilling to sanction such misspelling-based entries. Anyway, I'll see if anyone else has a comment.

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=ロコミとは&t=fpas&ia=web

ロコミ(ろこみ) seems to be a misspelt variant of this. Worth recording?

Daijs: ◆マスコミをもじった語。
jawiki: マスコミとの対比で生まれた言葉であり (https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/口コミ)

「マスコミ」 works as an antonym as well, but probably best to keep it a general xref, as it also helps explain the 「コミ」 part and derivation.

@@ -19,0 +20 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1127900">マスコミ</xref>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/なぎなた
http://www.naginata.org.uk/about/
http://naginata.jp/ (or http://www.naginata.jp/english.html, to get info in English)

True, I should certainly have included sources. I'll fix that rather sloppy omission.
It is more properly/specifically known as "atarashii naginata", but generally just called "naginata". (maybe should be marked as an abbreviation?)
In both Japanese and English.

No source/ref for the 2nd sense was 
provided, and it's not in daij. Is the 
word "naginata" used like this in English, 
or is the word 薙刀 used like this in 
Japanese?

@@ -22 +22 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">polearm​ with a curved single-edged blade (similar to a glaive)</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">polearm​ with a curved single- edged blade (similar to a glaive)</gloss>
@@ -26 +26 @@
-<gloss>The art of using a naginata</gloss>
+<gloss>the art of using a naginata</gloss>

I'm surprised, and a bit doubtful, that it's so common, but with the explanation there...
Also, it should be noted that the modern practice with naginata, is usually just called naginata, rather than naginatadou or naginatajutsu.

@@ -23,0 +24,4 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>The art of using a naginata</gloss>
+</sense>

naginata is about as common as "shuriken" and "nunchaku" in the Google Ngram Viewer.
(which strikes me as odd, but...)

@@ -21 +21,2 @@
-<gloss>polearm​ with a curved single-edged blade (similar to a glaive)</gloss>
+<gloss>naginata</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">polearm​ with a curved single-edged blade (similar to a glaive)</gloss>

Yes, partisans, as carried by the Yeomen of the Guard in ceremonies, are rather different.

@@ -21 +21 @@
-<gloss>a polearm​ with a curved single-edged blade (similar to a glaive)</gloss>
+<gloss>polearm​ with a curved single-edged blade (similar to a glaive)</gloss>

Partisan... I don't think I need to mention why and how that spear type is very different.

Fauchard is merely a more obscure term, for glaive. (to quote the Wikipedia article "In later historical text, the terms glaive (possibly Welsh) and fauchard are used to describe the same weapons./.../ Some historians use only the classification "glaive" or "fauchard" and ignore the other entirely.")

As for protruding bits on the glaive...
To again quote from Wikipedia (not the best place to use as a source, actually, as Wikipedia itself is first to point out, but...): "Occasionally, glaive blades were created with a small hook on the reverse side to better catch riders. Such blades are called glaive-guisarmes."
I.e. glaives often (usually) don't have protruding bits, but merely just a single edged blade.

As for being different to a naginata...
I don't really think the difference are such as to make it a different type, really, IMO, but... it's debatable, I suppose, and I can see the reason, for saying they're different. I guess the safest course is to go with the "established" view of it being separate.
The definition you suggest isn't bad. (though I've suggest a slight tweak)

@@ -21 +21 @@
-<gloss>curved single-edged blade mounted on a pole (similar to a glaive)</gloss>
+<gloss>a polearm​ with a curved single-edged blade (similar to a glaive)</gloss>

GG5: a Japanese halberd; a partisan.
中辞典: a naginata; a partisan; a pole sword.
ルミナス: Japanese halberd
リーダーズ+プラス: fauchard -> 薙刀
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naginata   "A naginata consists of a wooden or metal pole with a curved single-edged blade on the end; it is similar to the Chinese guan dao[4] or the European glaive..."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Partisan_(weapon)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fauchard
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glaive    "A glaive (or glave) is a European polearm, consisting of a single-edged blade on the end of a pole. It is similar to the Japanese naginata, ..."

I don't think it's close enough to a glaive to use that as the translation. Glaives (and partisans) have protruding bits. The closest European weapon is the fauchard, AFAICT. They're all varieties of polearm.
I've split 長刀/ちょうとう/long sword off into its own entry.

@@ -19,4 +18,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>ちょうとう</reb>
-<re_restr>長刀</re_restr>
-</r_ele>
@@ -25,2 +21 @@
-<gloss>glaive</gloss>
-<gloss>long sword</gloss>
+<gloss>curved single-edged blade mounted on a pole (similar to a glaive)</gloss>

Naginata are nothing like halberds, at all. (how and why it has come to often be translated as such, is beyond me)
They are glaives.

Naginata and choutou are two completely separate words, so they should be two separate entries. (also note that naginata are not swords, as some sometimes falsely call them. They are polearms. Glaives ...with blades that are distinctly different to any sword blade)

@@ -25 +25 @@
-<gloss>halberd</gloss>
+<gloss>glaive</gloss>

google

@@ -9,0 +9,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>名まえ</keb>
@@ -19,1 +22,1 @@
-<xref type="see">姓</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1375190">姓・せい・1</xref>

Hope we can close it now.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nakiri_bōchō
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usuba_bōchō

I can say that last edit wasn't by the same person. I'm did the anonymous edits, aside from that one (also on natagama, naginata and nagamaki ...though now I checked, there's been one more anonymous edit to naginata, that wasn't mine)
I've put my first name here, this time (it says to use ones full name, but... I value my privacy. You don't like just the first name, I'll just go full anonymous)

Pruning and debarking are far from the only uses, nor particularly common ones, from what I can tell.
No source I can find, even bothers to mention those uses. (I'd assume they are uses, though, given the uses mentioned)
The uses that generally are mentioned, are clearing brush, cutting branches, splitting wood, butchering (hunted) animals, shaving (carving?) wood, etc.
(it also seems to be the go-to tool, at least for a common man [i.e. who doesn't do it professionally. They might have something else], for cutting off a bit of bamboo)

That said, I don't exactly disagree with borrowing the Japanese name "nata", to use for it, in English. After all, it's a knife type that doesn't really have a name in English (due to not existing, in the English speaking world)
...but that's not really something for a dictionary to do.

I also made another edit, after my last one that can be seen here, but before the one I didn't make. It's no longer visible here, but I did find it through the search.
I'll include it here, to make it visible (and the references I've included, are from that edit):
These are some other rectangular bladed knives, that are not, and could not be used as, cleavers. (in much the same way, that cleavers could not be used as なた)

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>nata (Japanese pruning and debarking knife)</gloss>
+<gloss>type of sturdy broad-bladed knife, used in woodcraft and hunting</gloss>

The problem with anonymous submissions is I don't know if the previous two are from the same person, and representing a progression of ideas, or from two different people and are contradicting.
I'd accept the most recent one, but I rather like the inclusion of "sturdy" in there somewhere.
BTW, I have drafted an entry for 剣鉈.
We've come a long way from GG5 and the other JEs which translate 鉈 as "hatchet".

How's this?

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>sturdy rectangular-bladed knife, used in woodcraft and hunting</gloss>
+<gloss>nata (Japanese pruning and debarking knife)</gloss>

https://kitanodaichihamidorinariki.naturum.ne.jp/c20207447.html
http://www.hounen.co.jp/nata.htm
https://toyokuni.net/aa_images/kei/2007/shikoku_turukirinata/turukirinata.jpg
https://store.shopping.yahoo.co.jp/honmamon/4580149743151.html

Whilst I agree that the most "typical"/"normal" なた is superficially somewhat similar to a cleaver　(though not nearly as broad), a fundamental defining characteristic of a cleaver is still that it is a butcher/kitchen knife. (and again, the many significant differences I mentioned before)
There are many knives that a layman wouldn't be able to tell apart, just to look at them, that are nevertheless in very distinct and different categories. (the same applies to, e.g., axes)

...and many なた do not have that distinctive rectangular shape, as is clear from the references I mention. Note that 剣鉈 and 鉈鎌 are types of 鉈.

To me, the distinctive feature of a なた is the cleaver-like rectangular blade. (When I showed a picture several nata to my wife and asked her what she'd call them, she said "a cleaver".)

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>type of sturdy broad bladed knife, used in woodcraft and hunting.</gloss>
+<gloss>sturdy rectangular-bladed knife, used in woodcraft and hunting</gloss>

A cleaver is a butcher/kitchen knife.
It has a completely different purpose and also possess very different blades, to a nata. A lot broader blade (a lot broader than the handle, notably) and though they are relatively thick and sturdy, they are significantly less so, than a nata. A lot of typical uses of a nata (especially splitting wood), would utterly ruin any cleaver.
The closest thing to a nata, would be a machete or a hunting knife. (and ken'nata do look like the latter, as well as being used as such, in addition to its other uses)
It is neither, however, so it would be wrong to call it such.

The angle is notable (though not universal/required), but I guess it's not really necessary to mention.
Also the blade is often of uniform breadth (basically a rectangle) aside from ken'nata (剣鉈), which have a more typical knife shape as well as usually being straight, but the same applies to that, so no need to mention it either, I suppose.
Speaking of which: Adding an entry for 剣鉈 may be a good idea.

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>type of cleaver used in woodcraft and hunting</gloss>
+<gloss>type of sturdy broad bladed knife, used in woodcraft and hunting.</gloss>

From images the closest English term I can think of is "cleaver". Not sure the blade angle 
needs to be mentioned.

@@ -16,2 +16 @@
-<gloss>A type of knife for use in woodcraft and hunting</gloss>
-<gloss g_type="expl">Has a broad sturdy blade, typically set at a bit of an inward angle</gloss>
+<gloss>type of cleaver used in woodcraft and hunting</gloss>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/鉈
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=鉈&t=palemoon&iar=images&iax=images&ia=images

The term "hatchet" refers, exclusively, to a type of light axe.
A nata is not, in any way, shape, or form, an axe.
As is evident, when you look at any Japanese source, it is a knife.
(though it appears to generally be considered to be an apparently separate category, from 刀, in the Japanese mind/language  ...except for 剣鉈, which are undeniably knives)

@@ -16,2 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>nata hatchet</gloss>
-<gloss g_type="expl">traditional Japanese edged tool with short handle and wide blade</gloss>
+<gloss>A type of knife for use in woodcraft and hunting</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">Has a broad sturdy blade, typically set at a bit of an inward angle</gloss>

I think this works, with the expl. Also I think having an [expl] looks weird when the gloss is only "hatchet" - I get the impression that 
it's the preceding gloss e.g. "hatchet" that's being explained, not the Japanese word.

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>hatchet</gloss>
+<gloss>nata hatchet</gloss>

Google images for "hatchet" and "鉈" are really quite different (while 手斧 is a good match for "hatchet"). Is "hatchet" really the best 
gloss, even if happens to be in the other dictionaries? Can we at least call it "nata hatchet" or "nata machete"? (6k, 9k google results)

大ナタ	6682

(for the record)

大なた	4632
おおなた	489
大鉈	7545

I agree.

@@ -16 +15,0 @@
-<misc>&uk;</misc>

鉈を持って	975
ナタを持って	689
なたを持って	115
鉈を振り	        519
ナタを振り	352
なたを振り	91

Kanji use appears to be slightly more common.

Saw it subtitled like this on a news show.
Also here:
https://mainichi.jp/articles/20181127/k00/
00e/040/246000c
"凶器か　現場から血の付いたナタ発見"

g ng
鉈	66379
ナタ	100749

I think uk.

@@ -9,0 +10,4 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ナタ</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>
+</r_ele>
@@ -11,0 +16 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

Daijr, GG5, etc.

Trimming greatly. I don't like "machete" here, and Google images shows a very wide range. Daijirin's gloss is pretty general, so I have followed it.

@@ -12,3 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>(Japanese) hatchet</gloss>
-<gloss>(Japanese) machete</gloss>
-<gloss g_type="expl">both general term for large blades (other than specialized ones such as axes, swords, etc.), and specifically for traditional Japanese-style wide blade knife, similar to a small machete</gloss>
+<gloss>hatchet</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">traditional Japanese edged tool with short handle and wide blade</gloss>

GG5 daijr koj ja:WP
http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/鉈

Add “hatchet” gloss, which everyone gives, and fix explanation – it’s both a general term and a narrow (Japanese-specific) term.
(Saw on sign, telling an old story.)

@@ -12,1 +12,3 @@
-<gloss>wide blade knife (similar to a machete but not so large)</gloss>
+<gloss>(Japanese) hatchet</gloss>
+<gloss>(Japanese) machete</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">both general term for large blades (other than specialized ones such as axes, swords, etc.), and specifically for traditional Japanese-style wide blade knife, similar to a small machete</gloss>

Entry created

Oh, and I'm sure it's wasei.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<lsource xml:lang="eng">monitor tour</lsource>
+<lsource ls_wasei="y">monitor tour</lsource>

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/fam_trip
Recent translators' FB discussion.

Seems fam trip/tour is the term used in the travel industry in English.

@@ -13,0 +14,3 @@
+<gloss>promotional tour</gloss>
+<gloss>fam trip</gloss>
+<gloss>fam tour</gloss>

ngram
16386


http://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q101
3796065
"モニターツアーとは、
その旅行会社が新規で使おうと思っているホテル、レストランなどを
「お試し」で使ってみてアンケートの結果を見て
本採用するかどうかを決めるツアーですね。"

http://questionbox.jp.msn.com/qa555769.html

I think tapered knife makes it kinda sound like it's notably more tapered, than a usual knife ...but I'm not sure how exactly to write as a definition it, myself, either.
"nata with a more normal blade profile, tapering to a point" would be accurate and all, but would leave people wondering what a nata is.

https://www.bepal.net/gear/knife/21942/2
https://takibi.style/7888/
剣鉈	4893

See discussion on 2105610.