エムサイズ	297
エム・サイズ	No matches

Ｍサイズ - 15 tweets past 10 min
エムサイズ - 2 tweets past 24hrs
エム・サイズ - 1 tweet past year

Definitely not uk. What's the argument for keeping the nakaguro version?

@@ -15 +14,0 @@
-<misc>&uk;</misc>

Should keep the nakaguro version.

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

98M googits

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>Ｍサイズ</keb>
+</k_ele>

Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>エム・サイズ</reb>

@@ -24,0 +25 @@
+<field>&sports;</field>

meikyo; daijs

@@ -15,0 +16,16 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<field>&sports;</field>
+<gloss>half (of a game)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1094760">ハーフバック</xref>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<gloss>halfback</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<field>&golf;</field>
+<gloss>9-hole half (of a round)</gloss>

I too think the straight loanword sense should be first. Among other reasons it's what it 
means in almost all compounds.
Can drop the tag, I guess.

@@ -10 +10,4 @@
-<misc>&sens;</misc>
+<gloss>half</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -14,4 +16,0 @@
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>half</gloss>
-</sense>

with gairaigo, we normally put first the sense that corresponds to the foreign word of origin.  in addition, every single japanese and japanese-english dictionary lists "half" first.  this ordering looks silly

koj
②所定の材料などをまぜたもの。「ホットケーキ‐―」
daijs
(2)混ぜ合わせたもの。特に粉や調味料が混ぜ合わせてあって、簡単に料理や菓子が出来るようになったもの。「ホットケーキ―」「アイスクリーム―」

ミクス in koj only

ミックスして	87051	99.9%
ミクスして	46	0.1%

@@ -7,0 +8,4 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ミクス</reb>
+<re_inf>&rk;</re_inf>
@@ -15,0 +20,5 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>(pre-made) mix</gloss>
+<gloss>cake mix</gloss>

gg5, prog, luminous, daij, meikyo

Added sense.

@@ -13,0 +14,2 @@
+<gloss>mixture</gloss>
+<gloss>mixing</gloss>
@@ -16,0 +19,6 @@
+<field>&sports;</field>
+<gloss>mixed doubles team</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>mixed race</gloss>
@@ -18 +25,0 @@
-<gloss>multiracial person</gloss>

テイタラクだ	262
体たらくだ	3296
為体だ	38
ていたらくだ	1218

gg5
daijr: 現代では、好ましくない状態やほめられない状態についていう。 

体たらく 	90889
ていたらく	33968
為体    	4222
テイタラク	9615

@@ -12,0 +13,4 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>テイタラク</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>
+</r_ele>
@@ -15 +19 @@
-<gloss>state of affairs</gloss>
+<gloss>(unpleasant) state of affairs</gloss>
@@ -16,0 +21 @@
+<gloss>mess</gloss>

G n-grams 2007895

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -8,0 +10 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>member of National Diet</gloss>
+<gloss>member of the Diet</gloss>

http://www.yomiuri.co.jp/world/20140918-OYT1T50009.html
"「国会議員が義務を果たさないなら歳費も返納すべきだ」。"
国会議員 here refers to Korean National Assembly members.
_
http://www.gender.go.jp/whitepaper/h23/zentai/html/zuhyo/
zuhyo01-00-03.html　
here to Swedish Riksdag members

@@ -17,0 +18,2 @@
+<gloss>member of parliament</gloss>
+<gloss>MP</gloss>

GG5

@@ -20,0 +21,2 @@
+<gloss>minor character</gloss>
+<gloss>small fry</gloss>

@@ -18,0 +19,4 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>weak one</gloss>
+</sense>

shinmeikai, my IME

@@ -14,0 +15,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>笑</keb>
+<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>

@@ -41,1 +41,1 @@
-<gloss>general term for things related to sex (e.g. dildos, pornographic books, erotic woodblock prints, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>sex aids (e.g. dildos, pornographic books, erotic woodblock prints, etc.)</gloss>

daijs/daijr

@@ -39,0 +39,4 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>general term for things related to sex (e.g. dildos, pornographic books, erotic woodblock prints, etc.)</gloss>
+</sense>

splitting x-refs

@@ -24,1 +24,1 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1351360">笑う</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1351360">笑う・1</xref>
@@ -30,0 +30,1 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1351360">笑う・2</xref>
@@ -34,0 +35,1 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1351360">笑う・3</xref>

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obi_(publishing)

"Obi" is commonly used in English by people familiar with Japanese CDs, records, etc.
I think "kimono sash" is too short to be an expl gloss.
Only koj has たらし. I don't think it's needed. We'd need restr tags on all but the the first sense.

@@ -16,4 +15,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>たらし</reb>
-<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>
-</r_ele>
@@ -22,2 +18 @@
-<gloss>obi</gloss>
-<gloss g_type="expl">kimono sash</gloss>
+<gloss>obi (kimono sash)</gloss>
@@ -26 +20,0 @@
-<stagr>おび</stagr>
@@ -28,3 +22 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1753670">帯紙</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1953440">帯広告・おびこうこく</xref>
-<gloss>paper wrapper on books, CDs, etc.</gloss>
+<gloss>obi (strip of paper looped around a book, CD, etc. containing information about the product)</gloss>
@@ -40,0 +33 @@
+<field>&zool;</field>
@@ -45,2 +38,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1953450">帯番組・おびばんぐみ</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2076140">帯ドラマ・おびドラマ</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1953450">帯番組</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2076140">帯ドラマ</xref>

@@ -40 +40 @@
-<field>&med;</field>
+<field>&anat;</field>

GG5 (new sense 4)  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cingulum
中辞典 (new sense 5)

@@ -37,0 +38,12 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<field>&med;</field>
+<gloss>cingulum</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1953450">帯番組・おびばんぐみ</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2076140">帯ドラマ・おびドラマ</xref>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<gloss>radio or television program broadcast in the same time slot on all or most days</gloss>
+</sense>

koj daijs

https://dl.ndl.go.jp/info:ndljp/pid/1188633/408
mentions exports of Japanese playing cards coming to an halt 大戦中.
I was going to mark the new sense [obs] and call it
"the Great War; World War I" until I saw koj's definition.

@@ -19,0 +20,6 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1373930">世界大戦</xref>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<gloss>world war</gloss>

OK

i don't think that reading belongs here.  it is not supported by any dictionary.  references like "frequency of okurigana use" are not trustworthy here.  for a very common term with an obvious reading such as this one, okurigana is only supplied when the author is intentionally using an unusual reading (e.g. gikun) probably for artistic purposes

personally i would not bother with this now that おおいくさ is properly recorded.

@@ -16,3 +15,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>おおいくさ</reb>
-</r_ele>

いくさ is a kun reading of 戦, so not "ik". おおいくさ is more usually associated with 大軍/おおいくさ which means the same as 大戦 but is much less common. I'll set up an entry for it. They could be merged, but we don't like merges based on marginal readings, as is the case here.

@@ -11 +10,0 @@
-<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
 6,457	 15.8%	萎む
   493	  1.2%	凋む
33,846	 83.0%	しぼむ

Might be better to tag this entry as [ichi2]?

@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

I can live with it this way.

i think it's an iffy translation of the "having one's dreams deflate" sense, which is already covered in sense 1

tbf, it probably would make sense to split "dreams" out of sense 1

@@ -28,7 +27,0 @@
-<sense>
-<pos>&v5m;</pos>
-<pos>&vi;</pos>
-<misc>&uk;</misc>
-<gloss>to lose one's willpower</gloss>
-<gloss>to turn off</gloss>
-</sense>

G n-grams:
 朝鮮語	 153287
 韓国語	2007895

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1216180">韓国語・かんこくご</xref>

和英日本標準商品分類 https://ejje.weblio.jp/content/乳用牛

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>dairy cattle</gloss>

OK

This is what I had in mind.

@@ -9,3 +8,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>婆あ</keb>
-</k_ele>
@@ -14 +10,0 @@
-<re_restr>婆</re_restr>
@@ -17,3 +12,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>ばばあ</reb>
@@ -27 +19,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1396860">祖母</xref>
@@ -32,2 +23,0 @@
-<stagr>ばば</stagr>
-<stagr>ババ</stagr>
@@ -38 +28 @@
-<gloss>joker</gloss>
+<gloss>joker (in old maid)</gloss>

OK. Attempting a split.

@@ -25,12 +24,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>ババア</reb>
-<re_nokanji/>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>ばばー</reb>
-<re_nokanji/>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>ババー</reb>
-<re_nokanji/>
-</r_ele>
@@ -51,10 +38,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<stagr>ばばあ</stagr>
-<stagr>ばばー</stagr>
-<stagr>ババー</stagr>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<misc>&derog;</misc>
-<misc>&uk;</misc>
-<gloss>hag</gloss>
-<gloss>bitch</gloss>

This entry is a little messy with all the restrictions. I suggest splitting out the ばばあ forms into a separate entry.

Nothing to do with 婆. I'll make a new sense.

@@ -61,6 +60,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<field>&food;</field>
-<gloss>rum baba</gloss>
-<gloss>baba au rhum</gloss>

I agree with Jim

I prefer Rene's 2011 version. No problems with "usu.". The season reference is a common 
practice, but AFAIK not in the definition.

a Japanese poem in seventeen syllables having a 5-7-5 syllabic form and traditionally containing a reference to the seasons.

I remember being told years ago not to do abbreviations like "usu." "oft." outside of notes - that is our style, right?

I tried improve the expl a little because I thought it was a little hard to read.

@@ -19 +19 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">17-mora poem, usu. in 3 lines of 5, 7 and 5 morae</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">seventeen-mora poem usually in the form of 5-7-5 morae with one or several references to the season</gloss>

OK

daij, koj

Added reading. This is the only reading for sense 2.
I think we need to explain what the punishment actually is.

@@ -12,0 +13,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ほうらく</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -18,0 +22 @@
+<stagr>ほうらく</stagr>
@@ -20 +24,2 @@
-<gloss>form of historical Chinese torture</gloss>
+<misc>&hist;</misc>
+<gloss>form of punishment in which a person is forced to walk on an oiled pipe over a charcoal fire (ancient China)</gloss>

Thanks. References should be provided with the amendment.

@@ -17 +17,4 @@
-<gloss>form of historical Chinese torture that involved having someone walk on an oiled pipe over a raging flame</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>form of historical Chinese torture</gloss>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/炮烙

https://kotobank.jp/word/炮烙-628671

The Chinese torture definition is listed in most J-J dictionaries

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss>form of Chinese torture that involved having someone walk on an oiled pipe over a raging flame</gloss>
+<gloss>form of historical Chinese torture that involved having someone walk on an oiled pipe over a raging flame</gloss>

Please provide references. If none arrive soon I'll reject this edit.

I added the reading, e.g. "暇(ひま)[01[" to stop them linking to the いとま entry.

I've done it.

Actually I'm making a worklist for sentence indices elsewhere. Tatoeba seems to be MIA.

I'll approve and reopen (again). Yes, a 暇する entry might be the way to go.

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<field>&law;</field>

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
@@ -16 +17 @@
-<gloss>a false charge</gloss>
+<gloss>false charge</gloss>

I added it because I think they are basically synonyms, but "emerging market" is the much more commonly used expression in 
English (in the google book ngrams, it's roughly 10:1 to "emerging nation", 20:1 to "emergent nation"). "emerging market" 
also doesn't really refer to the market of said country but to the country, in most cases.

Wiki: "An emerging market is a country ..."
https://www.thebalance.com/what-are-emerging-markets-3305927
"Emerging markets, also known as emerging economies or developing countries, are nations ..."
https://www.economist.com/special-report/2008/09/20/ins-and-outs
"The term “emerging markets” dates back to 1981, recalls the man who invented it, Antoine van Agtmael. He was trying to 
start a “Third-World Equity Fund” to invest in developing-country shares, but his efforts to attract money were being 
constantly rebuffed. “Racking my brain, at last I came up with a term that sounded more positive and invigorating: emerging 
markets. ‘Third world' suggested stagnation; ‘emerging markets' suggested progress, uplift and dynamism.”"
https://www.yourdictionary.com/emerging-market
Webster's New World Finance and Investment Dictionary
"emerging market
A foreign country that is beginning to adopt capitalism and is showing promise as a good place to invest ..."

This matches with what daijs says: "３ 投資や貿易が盛んになり、急速に経済成長を続けている国。新興経済国。"

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<gloss>emerging market</gloss>

https://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/jn/114082/meaning/m1u/新興国/

gg5, eij

what's the reference for the market sense?  seems to me that this is not about markets per se, it's about countries with such markets.  i suggest sense 2 be deleted.

@@ -13,4 +13,3 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>emerging (national) market</gloss>
+<gloss>emergent nation</gloss>
+<gloss>developing country</gloss>
+<gloss>developing nation</gloss>

I can see it used in contexts that are nothing to do with markets or trade. Daijr, GG5, etc. don't mention markets in their definitions.

Is it really a separate sense?
wiki: "An emerging market is a country that has some characteristics of a developed market, but does not satisfy 
standards to be termed a developed market. "

I liked it better the way it was (did you read the earlier discussion?)

More country 
than market. 
Leading with a 
more common term

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<gloss>developing country</gloss>
@@ -15 +15,0 @@
-<gloss>developing country</gloss>

I added it because I think they are basically synonyms, but "emerging market" is the much more commonly used expression in 
English (in the google book ngrams, it's roughly 10:1 to "emerging nation", 20:1 to "emergent nation"). "emerging market" 
also doesn't really refer to the market of said country but to the country, in most cases.

Wiki: "An emerging market is a country ..."
https://www.thebalance.com/what-are-emerging-markets-3305927
"Emerging markets, also known as emerging economies or developing countries, are nations ..."
https://www.economist.com/special-report/2008/09/20/ins-and-outs
"The term “emerging markets” dates back to 1981, recalls the man who invented it, Antoine van Agtmael. He was trying to 
start a “Third-World Equity Fund” to invest in developing-country shares, but his efforts to attract money were being 
constantly rebuffed. “Racking my brain, at last I came up with a term that sounded more positive and invigorating: emerging 
markets. ‘Third world' suggested stagnation; ‘emerging markets' suggested progress, uplift and dynamism.”"
https://www.yourdictionary.com/emerging-market
Webster's New World Finance and Investment Dictionary
"emerging market
A foreign country that is beginning to adopt capitalism and is showing promise as a good place to invest ..."

This matches with what daijs says: "３ 投資や貿易が盛んになり、急速に経済成長を続けている国。新興経済国。"

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<gloss>emerging market</gloss>

https://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/jn/114082/meaning/m1u/新興国/

gg5, eij

what's the reference for the market sense?  seems to me that this is not about markets per se, it's about countries with such markets.  i suggest sense 2 be deleted.

@@ -13,4 +13,3 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>emerging (national) market</gloss>
+<gloss>emergent nation</gloss>
+<gloss>developing country</gloss>
+<gloss>developing nation</gloss>

Need to make clear who is conquered.

@@ -13 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>conquering barbarians (esp. the Emishi)</gloss>
+<gloss>defeating barbarians (esp. the Emishi)</gloss>
+<gloss>conquering barbarians</gloss>

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>conquering barbarians (esp. the Ezo)</gloss>
+<gloss>conquering barbarians (esp. the Emishi)</gloss>

daijr/s, nikk

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>warring against barbarians</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1195690">蝦夷・1</xref>
+<gloss>conquering barbarians (esp. the Ezo)</gloss>

I think "administered" is a better word here. It's what Wikipedia uses.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Southern Kuril Islands (held by Russia, claimed by Japan)</gloss>
+<gloss>Southern Kuril Islands (administered by Russia, claimed by Japan)</gloss>

gg5: the 《Russian-held》 Northern Territories.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Southern Kuril Islands</gloss>
+<gloss>Southern Kuril Islands (held by Russia, claimed by Japan)</gloss>

@@ -12,2 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>the Southern Kuril Islands</gloss>
-<gloss>the Northern Territories</gloss>
+<gloss>Southern Kuril Islands</gloss>
+<gloss>Northern Territories</gloss>

daijs

@@ -26 +26 @@
-<gloss>line covering the eyes of somebody (in a picture)</gloss>
+<gloss>line covering someone's eyes (in an edited photograph)</gloss>

@@ -16 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>one's gaze</gloss>
+<gloss>(one's) gaze</gloss>
+<gloss>direction in which one is looking</gloss>

google for 本編には目線が入っていません

@@ -22,0 +23,4 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>line covering the eyes of somebody (in a picture)</gloss>
+</sense>

Example:
google　一貫してユーザー目線でのサービス開発を行っていると考えます
.
I think it's a noun rather than an adverbial phrase.
"from the point of view of" is more like "...の目線で" (as in the example below)
.
GG5
2 〔視点〕 <i>one's</i> point of view.
●客の目線で店づくりを考える plan [design] a store with the viewpoint of customers in mind.
.
ＫＯＤ追加語彙
消費者目線 the consumer's point of view

@@ -20 +20,2 @@
-<gloss>from the point of view of</gloss>
+<gloss>point of view</gloss>
+<gloss>standpoint</gloss>

OK

I think 行書 and 草書 should have been aligned with this, rather than the other way round.
It was decided in the comments of 楷書 (1568280) to use "Chinese characters" instead of "kanji".

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>printed style of kanji</gloss>
+<gloss>printed style (of writing Chinese characters)</gloss>

Aligning with the 行書 and 草書 entries.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>printed style (of writing Chinese characters)</gloss>
+<gloss>printed style of kanji</gloss>

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1216180">韓国語・かんこくご</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1428430">朝鮮語</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1216180">韓国語</xref>

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1216180">韓国語・かんこくご</xref>

処理場	237056
しょりじょう	316
しょりば	76

@@ -9,0 +10,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>しょりば</reb>
+</r_ele>

Isn't this also read as しょりば occasionally? As in ゴミ処理場

GG%

@@ -12,0 +13,2 @@
+<gloss>Japan Standard Time</gloss>
+<gloss>JST</gloss>

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>甥ご</keb>

Entry created

gg5, prog, daij

@@ -17 +17,3 @@
-<gloss>bright</gloss>
+<gloss>bright (weather, mood, voice, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>clear</gloss>
+<gloss>fine</gloss>
@@ -19 +20,0 @@
-<gloss>fine</gloss>
@@ -20,0 +22,2 @@
+<gloss>splendid</gloss>
+<gloss>cheerful</gloss>

Indeed.

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

http://dictionary.mobile.goo.ne.jp/detail/kokugo/STARTWITH/05351

gg5 etc
wiki: no agreement whether it is a species or a subspecies

tidying

@@ -9 +9 @@
-<gloss>dingo (Australian carnivore, Canis (lupus) dingo)</gloss>
+<gloss>dingo (Canis (lupus) dingo)</gloss>

Entry created

麻雀牌	71026
マージャンパイ	6063
マージャン牌	5986

might as well tag it as [mahj]?

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>マージャン牌</keb>
@@ -11,0 +15 @@
+<field>&mahj;</field>

nikk

@@ -8,1 +8,1 @@
-<reb>まあじゃんぱい</reb>
+<reb>マージャンパイ</reb>
@@ -12,2 +12,1 @@
-<gloss>Mah Jong tile</gloss>
-<gloss>Mah Jong tiles</gloss>
+<gloss>mahjong tile</gloss>

Entry created

it's in gg5 as a searchable entry and given as the only example in koj, meikyo, etc.  i don't see a problem with it staying

G n-grams:
物の数ではない	1909

Given our 物の数 entry, I don't think this is really necessary. Not especially common either.

大辞泉

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<gloss>not a problem</gloss>

Entry created

なあんだ	22487
なーんだ	154222

@@ -8,0 +9,4 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>なーんだ</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>

何だこれ　	42290
なんだこれ	255235
何だこいつ	8229
何だこりゃ	18098
なんだこりゃ	142518

https://googirl.jp/renai/1510aruaru225/
"男子が「なんだこいつ！」と思う女子の特徴8つ"

I think there's one surprised meaning to it (あ、なんだ、もうやってくれたのか) but also an angrier, accusatory meaning e.g. 何だ
こいつ！！

@@ -17 +17,10 @@
-<gloss>What!</gloss>
+<gloss>what!</gloss>
+<gloss>oh</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<stagr>なんだ</stagr>
+<pos>&int;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>what the heck</gloss>
+<gloss>what the</gloss>
+<gloss>damn</gloss>

Eijiro

Why not.

@@ -10,0 +10,4 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>なあんだ</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>
+</r_ele>

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<gloss>trolling</gloss>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:荒らし

This is how ja.wiki internally translated the concept of internet vandalism. I moved "disturber" since it seemed out of place there.

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>disturber</gloss>
@@ -18 +19 @@
-<gloss>disturber</gloss>
+<gloss>vandalism</gloss>

GG5

@@ -20,0 +20,11 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1017770">アパート荒らし・アパートあらし</xref>
+<gloss>robbery</gloss>
+<gloss>holdup</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
+<gloss>robber</gloss>
+<gloss>thief</gloss>
+</sense>

Entry created

ルミナス, daijr, GG5

I think it's just part of sense 1.
I wonder about keeping sense 2. Daijr splits it out.

@@ -13,0 +14,2 @@
+<gloss>cell (prison)</gloss>
+<gloss>atrium</gloss>
@@ -17,6 +18,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1213740">監房</xref>
-<gloss>prison cell</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="2229660">坊・1</xref>

Nikkoku

@@ -13,0 +14,5 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1213740">監房</xref>
+<gloss>prison cell</gloss>

@@ -25,0 +25,1 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2176800">蒼竜・そうりょう・3</xref>

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ホワイト・ボックス</reb>

Daijr  https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_box_(computer_hardware)
ホワイトボックス	6446
ショップブランド	105405

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2840486">ショップブランド</xref>
@@ -10 +11,2 @@
-<gloss>whitebox</gloss>
+<gloss>white box</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">non-brandname PC</gloss>

Entry created

Feel free to suggest 出来がいい as an 
entry.

g n-grams:
出来が悪い	41517
出来がいい	54036
出来が良い	45533

If we have this expression, shouldn't we also have 出来がいい/良い? Or get rid of this entry, perhaps...

Entry created

I didn't really know what a primer was in cosmetics. I thought it was like an undercoat.

Like I've mentioned in a couple of comments, I believe [expl]s should be reserved for hard-to-translate Japanese concepts.

@@ -20 +19,0 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">base for makeup application</gloss>
@@ -25,2 +24 @@
-<gloss>primer</gloss>
-<gloss g_type="expl">molecule that serves as starting material for polymerization, etc.</gloss>
+<gloss>primer (molecule)</gloss>

Daijr, GG5

From rejected 2840376. There are other uses of primer in English which don't seem to apply to プライマー.

@@ -9,0 +10,17 @@
+<gloss>introductory book</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>primer (painting)</gloss>
+<gloss>undercoat</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>primer (cosmetics)</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">base for makeup application</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<field>&chem;</field>
+<gloss>primer</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">molecule that serves as starting material for polymerization, etc.</gloss>

Entry created

I think they are.

Daijisen

Are "ingratiatingly" or "servilely" real words?

@@ -19,0 +20 @@
+<gloss>subserviently</gloss>
@@ -20,0 +22 @@
+<gloss>servilely</gloss>

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<misc>&on-mim;</misc>
@@ -17,0 +19 @@
+<misc>&on-mim;</misc>

Entry created

Slitting.

@@ -6,3 +5,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>とんでもございません</reb>
@@ -14,0 +12 @@
+<misc>&pol;</misc>

Interesting.

https://twitter.com/IIMA_Hiroaki/status/1387213173472653314
https://www.bunka.go.jp/seisaku/bunkashingikai/kokugo/hokoku/pdf/keigo_tosin.pdf
"例えば、あの人のしていることはとんでもないことだ、と表現したい場合には 「あの方のなさっていることはとんでもございませんね 」などとは言えないが、「とんでもないことでございますね 」 などは普通に用いることができる。"

Indeed. I was reading a tweet written by a lexicographer about this the other day. He cites a keigo guide produced by the Council for Cultural Affairs in 2007. I've linked it above (see page 47). The guide also notes that it's fine to use とんでもございません/とんでもありません.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<s_inf>considered incorrect; とんでもない（こと）です is preferable</s_inf>
+<s_inf>sometimes considered incorrect; とんでもない（こと）です is preferable</s_inf>
@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<gloss>it was nothing</gloss>

I think とんでもありません/とんでもございません does not have all the same meanings as とんでもない does, I think it's just 
バイト敬語 for the "it was no bother at all sense." (prev sense 3)
I also think とんでもありません and とんでもございません should be separate entries

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1008790">とんでもない・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1008790">とんでもない・3</xref>
@@ -14,22 +14,2 @@
-<gloss>unthinkable</gloss>
-<gloss>unexpected</gloss>
-<gloss>outrageous</gloss>
-<gloss>offensive</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&exp;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="1008790">とんでもない・2</xref>
-<misc>&col;</misc>
-<gloss>absolutely not!</gloss>
-<gloss>not at all!</gloss>
-<gloss>far from it!</gloss>
-<gloss>impossible!</gloss>
-<gloss>preposterous!</gloss>
-<gloss>what a thing to say!</gloss>
-<gloss>no way!</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&exp;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="1008790">とんでもない・3</xref>
-<gloss>don't mention it</gloss>
-<gloss>you're welcome</gloss>
+<gloss>(it was) no bother at all</gloss>
+<gloss>not at all</gloss>

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<s_inf>considered incorrect; とんで もない（こと）です is preferable</s_inf>
+<s_inf>considered incorrect; とんでもない（こと）です is preferable</s_inf>

all these の年 entries seem unneeded

竜の年	139
龍の年	115

As the kanji and reading differ, they have to distinct entries.

@@ -15,0 +15,1 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1891570">辰の年・たつのとし</xref>

SPACE ALC   And google.
中国では竜の年は、戦争のように、社会的に大きな変動が起こりやすい年、といわれ
ているのだ。
In China, the year of the dragon will often have a great change in society 
（such as war）.〔【出典】Hiragana Times, 1992年2月号（株式会社ヤック企
画）

Both 竜 and 龍 can be pronounced たつlike another 'dragon' kanji 辰 as in 辰の年 
(year of the Dragon).  But exploring Google it seems like 辰の年 is always 
pronounced たつのとし and  竜の年 and 龍の年 are always pronounced りゅうのと
し.  Not sure how to handle that as one single entry.

https://kotobank.jp/word/(藁-188475
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/（笑）
"2000年代には、発音からくる「藁」や、wの見た目からくる「芝」という表記も見られた"

Or iK. Not sure which is best here.

https://www.reddit.com/r/newsokunomoral/comments/ro8ixq/comment/hpxhqkc/?utm_source=reddit&utm_medium=web2x&context=3

@@ -8,0 +9,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>藁</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

@@ -19 +19 @@
-<misc>&sl;</misc>
+<misc>&net-sl;</misc>

OK.

I agree with Rene on "(w". The ( serves basically the same function as (). It has no meaning and it's not pronounced. I don't think it should be included here.
However, I agree with Marcus that 笑 should remain as a headword. We lose the わら reading if it's dropped from here. The same applies to w.
I think 笑 should come before ｗ. It must be the more common form overall.
Finally, I wouldn't call this an abbreviation. 笑 and 笑い are used differently.

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>ｗ</keb>
+<keb>笑</keb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<keb>笑</keb>
+<keb>ｗ</keb>
@@ -19 +18,0 @@
-<misc>&abbr;</misc>

OK

Of these 19 forms, I think 4 is probably enough to convey the whole range.

〈す／ス〉（っ／ッ／ん／ン）〈げ／ゲ〉（え／ぇ／エ／ェ／ー／い／イ）

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬───────────┬───────╮
│ すげ　　 │ 2,695,232 │  N/A  │
│ すげー　 │ 1,150,853 │ 27.8% │ - visible
│ すっげ　 │   581,431 │ 14.0% │
│ すげぇ　 │   481,882 │ 11.6% │ - visible
│ すげえ　 │   400,105 │  9.7% │ - sk
│ スゲー　 │   366,460 │  8.8% │ - sk
│ すんげ　 │   280,802 │  6.8% │
│ すっげー │   250,820 │  6.1% │ - visible
│ すっげぇ │   114,889 │  2.8% │ - sk
│ スゲ　　 │   112,433 │  N/A  │
│ すんげー │   108,618 │  2.6% │ - visible
│ スゲェ　 │   105,438 │  2.5% │ - sk
│ すんげぇ │    72,947 │  1.8% │ - sk
│ すっげえ │    48,364 │  1.2% │ - sk
│ スッゲー │    36,772 │  0.9% │ - sk
│ スゲエ　 │    33,805 │  0.8% │ - sk
│ すんげえ │    28,522 │  0.7% │ - sk
│ スゲぇ　 │    13,985 │  0.3% │
│ すげい　 │    13,858 │  0.3% │ - sk
│ スンゲー │    10,544 │  0.3% │ - sk
│ スッゲェ │     7,325 │  0.2% │ - sk
│ スッゲ　 │     7,168 │  0.2% │
│ すげェ　 │     4,224 │  0.1% │
│ スンゲェ │     3,323 │  0.1% │ - sk
│ スゲイ　 │     2,513 │  0.1% │ - sk
│ スゲえ　 │     2,151 │  0.1% │
│ スンゲ　 │     1,857 │  0.0% │
│ すんげい │     1,825 │  0.0% │
│ スッゲエ │     1,700 │  0.0% │ - sk
│ すっげい │     1,213 │  0.0% │
│ すっげェ │     1,022 │  0.0% │
╰─ーーーー─┴───────────┴───────╯

@@ -11,0 +12,6 @@
+<reb>すっげー</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>すんげー</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -13,3 +19 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>すっげー</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
@@ -19,3 +23 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>すんげー</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
@@ -24,0 +27 @@
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
@@ -27,0 +31 @@
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
@@ -30,0 +35 @@
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
@@ -33,0 +39 @@
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
@@ -36,0 +43 @@
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
@@ -39,0 +47 @@
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
@@ -42,0 +51 @@
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
@@ -45,0 +55 @@
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
@@ -48,0 +59 @@
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
@@ -51,0 +63 @@
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
@@ -54,0 +67 @@
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
@@ -57,0 +71 @@
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
@@ -60,0 +75 @@
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

Merging 2018060. See comments there.

@@ -47,0 +48,6 @@
+<reb>すげい</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>スゲイ</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -60,2 +65,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2018060">すげい</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2018060">すげい</xref>
@@ -64,0 +69,2 @@
+<gloss>terrific</gloss>
+<gloss>impressive</gloss>

At least there aren't restrictions.

@@ -59 +59 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1374550">すごい</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1374550">すごい・2</xref>

すんげー	108618
すんげぇ	72947
すんげえ	28522
スンゲー	10544
スンゲェ	3323
スンゲエ	672 (skipped this one)

It certainly wouldn't be the first time we split out something to make an entry more readable. This is a big mess.

@@ -17,0 +18,6 @@
+<reb>スゲー</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>すんげー</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -24 +30 @@
-<reb>スゲー</reb>
+<reb>すんげぇ</reb>
@@ -42 +48,7 @@
-<reb>すんげー</reb>
+<reb>すんげえ</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>スンゲー</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>スンゲェ</reb>

yeah, i don't think i would call it obsc.  i don't think that's really a relational tag; it's some absolute measure of how common it is.  normally we just xref to the more common term.

@@ -13 +12,0 @@
-<misc>&obsc;</misc>

I don't think "obsc" is right for something 
that gets 2k in the ngrams. I understand the 
intention, but we already have an xref to 韓国
語, which in this case is supposed to be 
interpreted as "(much) more commonly as:"
I think that's enough.
(though I've been meaning to propose for 
jmdict nextgen that we include more labels for 
xrefs beyond "see" and "ant", including 
"morecommonlyas")

韓語	2746
韓国語	2007895

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<misc>&obsc;</misc>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1428430">朝鮮語・ちょうせんご</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1216180">韓国語</xref>

@@ -6,0 +7 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -10,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/パラグアイ#国名
http://www.lib.kobe-u.ac.jp/das/jsp/ja/ContentViewM.jsp?METAID=10026265&TYPE=HTML_FILE&POS=1
https://association.joureikun.jp/jica/act/frame/frame110000266.htm
http://www.kanjijiten.net/nandoku/country.html

@@ -7,0 +8,4 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>巴羅貝</keb>
+<ke_inf>&ateji;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
@@ -9,0 +14,6 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>パラグァイ</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>パラグワイ</reb>

daijr

@@ -4,0 +4,4 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>巴拉圭</keb>
+<ke_inf>&ateji;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
@@ -9,0 +13,1 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

三倍満	2421
さんばいマン	No matches
さんバイマン	No matches
サンバイマン	367

Poss. nokanji.

@@ -9,0 +10,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>サンバイマン</reb>
+</r_ele>

possibly さんバイマン、サンバイマン

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>さんばいまん</reb>
+<reb>さんばいマン</reb>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1812550">満貫・まんがん</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1812550">満貫</xref>

@@ -13 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>win worth 24000 points (or, if dealer, 36000 points) (mahjong)</gloss>
+<field>&mahj;</field>
+<gloss>win worth 24000 points (or, if dealer, 36000 points)</gloss>

@@ -13,1 +13,1 @@
-<gloss>win worth 24000 points (or, if dealer, 36000 points) in mahjong</gloss>
+<gloss>win worth 24000 points (or, if dealer, 36000 points) (mahjong)</gloss>

arch perhaps?

Might it be better to add 大戦 as a kanji form to this entry instead of having おおいくさ on 1414360?

Koj, Daijr
大戦	3135577
大軍	108230

See discussion on 1414360.

https://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q1131116746
げふんげふん	15291
ゲフンゲフン	16788

Better?

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ゲフンゲフン</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -8 +11 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&int;</pos>
@@ -10 +13,3 @@
-<gloss>a cough or a noise to make it as if one didn't say something</gloss>
+<gloss>ahem</gloss>
+<gloss>cough-cough</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">noise in lieu of a comment or contrary view</gloss>

https://www.weblio.jp/content/げふんげふん

This looks like a rather obvious A+B construction to me. I suggest rejecting.

https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=資格を取る

Aligning.

@@ -14 +14,3 @@
-<gloss>bright</gloss>
+<gloss>bright (weather, mood, voice, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>clear</gloss>
+<gloss>fine</gloss>
@@ -16 +17,0 @@
-<gloss>fine</gloss>
@@ -17,0 +19,2 @@
+<gloss>splendid</gloss>
+<gloss>cheerful</gloss>

Daijr, GG5

Seems to be an old literary form.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2285880">ＳＦＡ・エス・エフ・エー</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2285880">ＳＦＡ</xref>

Daijr, ＫＯＤ追加語彙

I find the way the kokugos cling to 名 POS tags a bit annoying.

My version of nikk has it as "形動タリ" and daijs only gives a 〜する example for its noun sense.
I don't really mind keeping [n] but my thinking is that the PoS tags are helpful for people trying to write Japanese rather than read it.
If a PoS isn't in meikyo or shinmeikai, I take that as a sign that we don't need to include it here either.

諜々;諜諜 from nikk and kanjigen

daijs and nikk do have it as a noun, and nikk defines it as a noun しきりにしゃべること.  i don't really see what harm it would do to keep [n].  keeping in mind that it's a J-E, and archaic japanese is one of the few areas in which jmdict is far superior to gg5 and eijiro

daijr/daijs also have as と/たる.

@@ -9,0 +10,6 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>諜々</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>諜諜</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -14,0 +21 @@
+<pos>&adj-t;</pos>
@@ -15,0 +23 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>

gg5, daij
meikyo: "〔文〕"

Not a noun in modern Japanese.

@@ -15 +14,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -17,4 +16,4 @@
-<gloss>talking glibly</gloss>
-<gloss>chattering</gloss>
-<gloss>jabbering</gloss>
-<gloss>babbling</gloss>
+<misc>&litf;</misc>
+<gloss>glibly</gloss>
+<gloss>volubly</gloss>
+<gloss>at great length</gloss>

meikyo, etc.

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<pos>&adv-to;</pos>

I'd keep it for the ソレ variants.

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<re_restr>何それ</re_restr>
+<re_restr>何ソレ</re_restr>

I think it's worth to take into account that 何これ/それ/あれ is a pretty unusual construction. It's not like you can throw 
in another noun/pronoun in place of これ/それ/あれ
ｘ何勉強？
ｘ何ここ？
ｘ何彼？

unneeded, IMO.

何ソレ	10862
なにソレ	988
ナニそれ	1930

@@ -6,0 +7,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>何ソレ</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -8,0 +12,5 @@
+<re_restr>何それ</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>なにソレ</reb>
+<re_restr>何それ</re_restr>

18 hits past 5 min on twitter for 何それ
なにそれ	95474
何それ	107003
ナニソレ	8054

OK with me.

reopen.  if someone objects to this entry, feel free to delete

not sure it's needed but if it is going to be recorded, it should be like this.

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>疑いの目を向ける</keb>
+<keb>疑いの目</keb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>うたがいのめをむける</reb>
+<reb>うたがいのめ</reb>
@@ -12,3 +12,4 @@
-<pos>&v1;</pos>
-<gloss>to look at with suspicion</gloss>
-<gloss>to have a doubting look on one's face</gloss>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>suspicious glance</gloss>
+<gloss>suspicious look</gloss>
+<gloss>suspicious expression</gloss>

疑いの目	36861


疑いの目を向ける	3861
疑いの目を向け	5755
疑いの目を向けて	1779
疑いの目を向けた	515


疑いの目で見る	1478
疑いの目で見られる	1222

cf. with other ～の目を向ける (all in eij)
懐疑の目を向ける	193
非難の目を向ける	312
憎しみの目を向ける	73
不信の目を向ける	197
好奇の目を向ける	331
also 

優しい目を向ける	175
冷たい目を向ける	308
鋭い目を向ける	151



gg5:
定説にも疑いの目を向けることが必要だ.　We need to cast a skeptical eye upon the accepted view as well.
also: 
疑いの目で見る eye sb suspiciously
疑いの目で見る regard sb with suspicion

I don't mind it. It seems to be the most common construction of this type. it's a little compositional though. I'll let another editor 
decide.

https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=疑いの目を

I'll join the majority on this.

eijiro doesn't even have an entry for this and that is a giant shit heap of random trash scraped from the internet

i do agree that "rape scene" is more of a trope and therefore more idiomatic than "smoking scene" or pretty much anything other than "sex scene".  but i just don't see why this needs to be an entry.  it's a J-E dictionary.  this is just レイプ + シーン...  no one is going to confuse the meaning of this with anything else

the general agreement among editors seems to be that although this entry is harmless, it is also pretty much useless.  because there is basically zero benefit to anyone by this entry existing, perhaps there is no need to belabour the point and we can just delete the entry again?

>> レイプシーン is to me fundamentally different from 救急車のサイレン (16052) or 教会の屋根 (2927)
I gave those as English examples (noun+noun) because I didn't think the "red balloon" (adjective+noun) comparison was apt.

Personally, I don't see a case made for adding レイプシーン that can't be made for 喫煙シーン/会話シーン. So unless we decide that every type of movie scene should go in, my position is that none of them are necessary.

>> I also disagree that it's "not likely" anyone will do an E->J lookup for "rape scene". What is there to base that assumption on?
That no one would expect to find it in a dictionary. There probably isn't a dictionary on earth in any language that contains the expression "rape scene" as a headword. If someone wanted to say "rape scene", they'd look up "rape" and "scene". I think that's a perfectly reasonable assumption.

Regarding セックスシーン, Japanese dictionaries already have entries for ベッドシーン and 濡れ場 so it's helpful to show that セックスシーン is another common term used to refer to the same thing. Also, people are *much* more likely to do an E->J search in this case.

1 example sentence in eij:
"生々しいセックスやレイプシーンを描写する
depict graphic sex and rape scenes"


"そして、中国人監督が製作した「南京！　南京！」「南京保衛戦」といった虐殺やレイプシーンが多く含まれる映画を..."
https://www.sankei.com/world/news/151215/wor1512150018-n2.html
"「巨匠」ベルナルド・ベルトルッチ監督が、自身の「ラストタンゴ・イン・パリ」（1972）についてのインタビューで、女優に詳細を伝えずレイプシーンを撮影したと語ったことが話題になって
いる。"
https://dot.asahi.com/wa/2016121500155.html?page=1
"イーライ・ロス監督によりラナ・デル・レイがレイプシーンを演じたとされるマリリン・マンソンのビデオが、3週間前にネット上で公開され直ちに広まったものの、同映像は引き下げられた。"
https://dot.asahi.com/billboardnews/2014121200072.html
"女性がアダルトビデオ（AV）への出演を強要される問題が広がり、女優が所属先を告発したり、芸能プロダクションの社長が逮捕されるケースが出てきた。一方で、AV業界では、女優の承諾を得
ずにレイプシーンを撮影する「ドッキリレイプ」というジャンルがあるという。"
https://webronza.asahi.com/culture/themes/2016071200008.html
"主演はモデルの平塚千瑛（ちあき＝30）で、レイプシーン含め、ヌードも辞さない体当たりの演技で挑む。"
http://geino-smp.nikkansports.com/ent/d/m/?topic_id=2&id=1772528&year=2017&month=1&day=31
"「うわさされるような熊のレイプシーンは存在しない。熊がレオに体を押しつけるシーンはあるが、襲った熊はメスで、小熊を守るためにとった自然の行動」"
https://www.nikkansports.com/entertainment/news/1575531.html
"問題のレイプシーンを筆頭に、ユペールが女優としてほぼすべてをさらけ出して事実を忠実に表現していることは言うまでもない。"
https://news.yahoo.co.jp/byline/kiyotohideto/20170313-00068632/
"その他ジェリー藤尾の娘・藤尾美紀が、宇津井の娘役でレイプシーンに体当たりで挑み女優魂を見せ付けた。"
https://www.tbs.co.jp/tbs-ch/item/d1078/
"レイプシーンを見た人が、自分も同じ事をしますか？"
http://www.intl.hiroshima-cu.ac.jp/~spartan/baitai/phycho.htm
"レイプシーンを見るときにも、犯す・犯されるどちらか一方の立場にに自己同一化するとはかぎらず、犯し犯されるという二重の快楽を他県している可能性があること指摘する。"
https://kuir.jm.kansai-u.ac.jp/dspace/bitstream/10112/6149/1/KU-1100-19991125-16.pdf

"Rape scene is a setting where a rape has taken place, either fictional or real."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rape_Scene_(disambiguation)

Ngrams comparison of sex scene, rape scene, nude scene (in English)
https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?
content=rape+scene%2C+sex+scene%2C+nude+scene&case_insensitive=on&year_start=1800&year_end=2009&corpus=15&smoothing=3&share=&direct_url=t4%3B%2Crape%20scene%3B%
2Cc0%3B%2Cs0%3B%3Brape%20scene%3B%2Cc0%3B%3BRape%20Scene%3B%2Cc0%3B.t4%3B%2Csex%20scene%3B%2Cc0%3B%2Cs0%3B%3Bsex%20scene%3B%2Cc0%3B%3BSex%20Scene%3B%2Cc0%3B.t1%
3B%2Cnude%20scene%3B%2Cc0#t4%3B%2Crape%20scene%3B%2Cc0%3B%2Cs0%3B%3Brape%20scene%3B%2Cc0%3B%3BRape%20Scene%3B%2Cc0%3B.t4%3B%2Csex%20scene%3B%2Cc0%3B%2Cs0%3B%3Bs
ex%20scene%3B%2Cc0%3B%3BSex%20Scene%3B%2Cc0%3B.t1%3B%2Cnude%20scene%3B%2Cc0

I'm sorry to keep this going, but I'm not really satisfied with this conclusion. I feel like we're just setting us up for repeating this argument again at a later 
stage, on a different entry.

I don't think anybody has explained how a "セックスシーン" and a "レイプシーン" differ, for starters.

A "rape scene" is idiomatic in both English and Japanese and is a well-understood and often-commented on (in media, academia) concept/trope in movie making. レイ
プシーン is to me fundamentally different from 救急車のサイレン (16052) or 教会の屋根 (2927), not least evidenced by the fact that the most common way of phrasing 
those things in Japanese is as ～の～. (cf. レイプのシーン: 130,　レイプの場面: 58, 教会屋根: 90, 救急車サイレン: 130) 
It's also obvious somebody wouldn't refer to a "church roof" as a "church roof" except to distinguish it from other roofs. Normally, you'd refer to it as "the 
roof" (or "the siren") without qualification, unlike I think a rape scene.

The difference between a レイプシーン and a 喫煙シーン is that a rape scene is a type or category of scene, while a 喫煙シーン is a scene where smoking happens to 
occur - it's not a specific type of scene or even the main purpose of the scene. "OK, let's add a tobacco-smoking scene here!" That said, considering how much 喫
煙シーン's have been discussed in Japanese media, I'm not really sure I'd oppose its inclusion if somebody suggested it. As for 会話シーン (21543, cf. 会話のシーン: 
6846), I don't know, the case for inclusion seems weaker than it is for レイプシーン, but I see it's in wadoku.

I also disagree that it's "not likely" anyone will do an E->J lookup for "rape scene". What is there to base that assumption on? The dictionary files have all 
levels of users, from absolute beginners to native speakers. If somebody might look up "sex scene", they might as well look up "rape scene."

I'm usually relaxed about gairaigo NN compounds. They're harmless and they often help 
disambiguation in text glossing. That doesn't seem to apply here. Given the views which have 
emerged here, I think it's best to drop it. I'll add it to the glossing specials file.

see comments on 2840551

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<gloss>rockfish</gloss>
+<gloss>non-migratory seabed fish (e.g. rockfish)</gloss>

daij nikk　wiki
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/根魚
wiki alone leads with ねぎょ (not in daijs/nikk)

ok

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2840539">根魚</xref>

Should 根魚 be aligned with this? I feel the two are probably the same, but 根魚 is only "rockfish"

Daijr, GG5
ねつきうお	No matches
根付魚	76
根付き魚	88

Mentioned in Daijirin's 根魚 entry.

I took my eye off this one, but I meant to add the comment that as a 70-something non-manga person, the first time I saw ナルト走り I thought it was something to do with the whirlpool near Tokushima.

I'll go ahead and approve this for now (feel free to re-open). At the end of a day, we're a free-to-use wa-ei online dictionary - I 
don't really think we have to worry about coming across as frivolous for having pop culture-related entries.

I think it's sl rather than col because I don't think it's widely understood outside people watching the anime.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<misc>&col;</misc>
+<misc>&sl;</misc>

i think the 'carlton dance' comparison is pretty good although fresh prince is not quite as culturally impactful.  also, i don't think this is really manga slang (i.e., a term used in manga) is it?  isn't it just a colloquialism that happens to be based on manga?

i would probably omit this as well.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<misc>&m-sl;</misc>
+<misc>&col;</misc>

slightly less than 40 tweets past week containing ナルト走り (kind of lost count)
37 hits past 24 hrs for tweets containing "Naruto run" (i.e. in English)

I wouldn't really be surprised to see the "Carlton dance" in a large-scale comprehensive dictionary, eventually. "The robot" is in Collins English Dictionary 
as "robot dancing". The moonwalk is just a single move (or at least not a full dance) and is definitely in several dictionaries. Last year the Swedish verb 
"flossa" (to do the floss) was added to a list of a "今年の新語"-like list compiled by the Swedish Language Council ("the primary regulatory body for the 
advancement and cultivation of the Swedish language"). I think the large 英英 dictionaries are much more concerned about not including "fleeting" expressions 
than what we should/need to be. Even if a word might disappear in a year or two, the contemporary texts using it won't. As a 和英 dictionary, we are much less 
prescriptive than 英英's and we don't have to worry about having weird effects like actually altering the target language/making a term become more accepted 
because "it's in the dictionary!".
 
It's interesting that "Naruto run" seems more commonly used/known in English than ナルト走り is in Japanese - several of the Japanese googits are about its 
popularity abroad.

I think this entry is at last somewhat useful. Not sure it's fair to call it "m-sl" (but then again I don't like the tag and think we should get rid of it)

Odd, I got 6000 hits  yesterday.
But the more important point is that this is just a goofy anime thing. It's not some widespread cultural phenomenon.
Indeed, ナルト走り would not be understand by someone who isn't familiar with Naruto, but that's true of all pop-culture references. You wouldn't expect to find something like "Carlton dance" in an English dictionary.
I feel quite strongly that this shouldn't go in.

リーダーズ+プラス

日英・英日専門用語辞書, weblio https://ejje.weblio.jp/content/風力原動機

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>person who grows up with smartphones</gloss>
+<gloss>person who has grown up with smartphones</gloss>

I think it can be assumed that they're accustomed to them.

@@ -13 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>person who grew up with (and is accustomed to using) smartphones</gloss>
+<gloss>person who grows up with smartphones</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="lit">smartphone native</gloss>

Too much?

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>person who grew up with smartphones</gloss>
+<gloss>person who grew up with (and is accustomed to using) smartphones</gloss>

daijs
I found at least one hit for this in English, but seems very marginal:
https://momentfeed.com/blog/from-digital-natives-to-smartphone-natives/

daijs also has スマートホンネイティブ but I don't think we need that.

google images...

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>ledge</gloss>

gg5
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/犬走り

wiki redir to 麻雀
マージャン荘	406
麻雀荘   	6356

cf
雀荘    	129337
ジャン荘 	506

wadoku, 日本標準産業分類 
https://www.weblio.jp/content/マージャンクラブ
mypedia 麻雀 entry:
"... 麻雀クラブ（雀荘）から一般家庭にまで広がったのは第２次大戦後で，日本独自のルールもつくられている。"

麻雀クラブ	4162
マージャンクラブ	1049


cf.
マージャン荘	406
麻雀荘   	6356

雀荘    	129337
ジャン荘 	506