@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+<field>&food;</field>

ミート	1157084

Probably. I think it's more likely this ミート than the other one.

Should the gai1 stay here?

@@ -12,7 +11,0 @@
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<pos>&vs;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="1065260">ジャストミート</xref>
-<field>&baseb;</field>
-<gloss>hitting the ball squarely</gloss>
-</sense>

@@ -25 +25 @@
-<s_inf>usu. as 異口同音に</s_inf>
+<s_inf>usu. adverbially as 〜に</s_inf>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 異口同音　　　 │ 37,513 │ 97.8% │
│ 異句同音　　　 │    513 │  1.3% │ - [iK] to [sK]
│ いくどうおん　 │    329 │  0.9% │
│ いこうどうおん │      0 │  0.0% │ - drop restriction
╰─ーーーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -20 +19,0 @@
-<re_restr>異口同音</re_restr>

gg5
G n-grams:
異口同音	37492	  
異口同音に	30221

Daijr has the いこうどうおん reading.

@@ -17,0 +18,4 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>いこうどうおん</reb>
+<re_restr>異口同音</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
@@ -19,0 +24 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -21,2 +26,2 @@
-<gloss>in concert</gloss>
-<gloss>with one voice</gloss>
+<s_inf>usu. as 異口同音に</s_inf>
+<gloss>(saying) with one voice</gloss>
@@ -23,0 +29,3 @@
+<gloss>in chorus</gloss>
+<gloss>in unison</gloss>
+<gloss>as one</gloss>

Don't see a need for this when we have the 異口同音 entry.

Aligning.

@@ -13,0 +14,2 @@
+<gloss>immediately</gloss>
+<gloss>instantly</gloss>
@@ -15,3 +17 @@
-<gloss>instantly</gloss>
-<gloss>in a flash</gloss>
-<gloss>practically immediately after</gloss>
+<gloss>without a moment's delay</gloss>

間一髪を入れず  45

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<misc>&obsc;</misc>
@@ -14,0 +16 @@
+<gloss>in a flash</gloss>

See reasoning on 間髪を入れず

"In a flash", "in no time" sounds like they describe the rapid speed of the action that follows, when the expression is only about the immediacy of its beginning.

@@ -12,2 +12,5 @@
-<gloss>in a flash</gloss>
-<gloss>in no time</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1867250">間髪を入れず</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1867250">間髪を入れず</xref>
+<gloss>with nary a pause</gloss>
+<gloss>instantly</gloss>
+<gloss>practically immediately after</gloss>

I don't think "adherence" works.

@@ -23 +22,0 @@
-<gloss>adherence</gloss>

meikyo

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

I don't think adj-no is entirely right.

@@ -19 +18,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

GG5, etc.

@@ -21 +21,3 @@
-<gloss>entrance</gloss>
+<gloss>joining</gloss>
+<gloss>entry</gloss>
+<gloss>adherence</gloss>

もてはやす	6943
持てはやす	1591
もて囃す	62
持て囃す	1028
もて栄す	No matches
持て栄す	No matches
もて栄やす	No matches
持て栄やす	No matches
もて映やす	No matches
持て映やす	No matches

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<keb>もて囃す</keb>
+<keb>持て囃す</keb>
@@ -11 +11 @@
-<keb>持て囃す</keb>
+<keb>もて囃す</keb>

daijirin has 持て栄す.  sorted by hits

もて is a prefix that comes from もって(以て), so 持て appears to be ateji or iK

@@ -8,0 +8,3 @@
+<keb>もて囃す</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -12,4 +15,0 @@
-<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>もて囃す</keb>
@@ -19,0 +18,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>もて映やす</keb>
@@ -25,0 +27,2 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

daijs daijr

@@ -12,0 +12,7 @@
+<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>もて囃す</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>もて栄やす</keb>

Maybe a bit unnecessary. PLEASE make a case for such changes.

@@ -14 +13,0 @@
-<gloss>small edged weapon often used for throwing</gloss>

daijs doesn't describe it as an abbr. I don't think the note adds much.

@@ -29,2 +29 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2122570">全くもう</xref>
-<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<xref type="see" seq="2122570">まったくもう</xref>
@@ -32 +30,0 @@
-<s_inf>expression of exasperation</s_inf>

Please make a case for such amendments.

@@ -31,0 +32 @@
+<s_inf>expression of exasperation</s_inf>

@@ -33 +33 @@
-<gloss>good grief (expression of exasperation)</gloss>
+<gloss>good grief</gloss>

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -22,0 +24 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

meikyo

@@ -23 +23,2 @@
-<gloss>midfield</gloss>
+<field>&sports;</field>
+<gloss>midfield (in soccer)</gloss>

The kokugos and JEs handle this rather differently.

Daijisen

@@ -18,0 +19,4 @@
+<gloss>midpoint</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>

i wouldn't call this a suffix.  it just forms part compound nouns.  we don't indicate this

i see no evidence of it being an adverb either, and at a minimum n-adv certainly shouldn't be the first pos listed

@@ -15 +14,0 @@
-<pos>&n-adv;</pos>

Looks OK. 天之邪鬼 is hardly worth it.

nikk has あまんじゃく as a reading of 天邪鬼

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
| 天邪鬼　　　 | 126,102 | 50.8% |
| 天の邪鬼　　 |  32,499 | 13.1% |
| 天ん邪鬼　　 |      53 |  0.0% | <- in daijr, koj
| 天之邪鬼　　 |      33 |  0.0% |
| 天邪久　　　 |       0 |  0.0% | <- in koj
| あまのじゃく |  83,672 | 33.7% |
| あまんじゃく |   5,902 |  2.4% |

JP wikipedia was cited as a source for 天之邪鬼 in the edit history, but I don't see it in the article.
I know 之 is an alternate way of writing の... I guess that's sufficient?

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -17,0 +19 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -27,0 +30 @@
+<re_restr>天邪鬼</re_restr>

天邪鬼	126102
天の邪鬼	32499
天之邪鬼	33
天邪久	< 20   - in Koj
天ん邪鬼	53

@@ -10,0 +11,3 @@
+<keb>天ん邪鬼</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -16,3 +18,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>天ん邪鬼</keb>
-</k_ele>
@@ -20,0 +21,4 @@
+<re_restr>天邪鬼</re_restr>
+<re_restr>天の邪鬼</re_restr>
+<re_restr>天之邪鬼</re_restr>
+<re_restr>天邪久</re_restr>
@@ -23,0 +28 @@
+<re_restr>天ん邪鬼</re_restr>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/天邪鬼

天ん邪鬼 and 天の邪鬼 are alternate forms. So you could remove the 天ん邪鬼 entry.

@@ -10,0 +11,3 @@
+<keb>天之邪鬼</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -11,0 +15,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>天ん邪鬼</keb>
@@ -14,0 +21,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>あまんじゃく</reb>

gg5
 a devil (whose image is shown being trampled upon by one of the two guardian deities placed in a Buddhist temple gate); 〔性質〕 perverseness; 〔人〕 a perverse person; a cross-grained person.
==
wisdom
【つむじ曲がり】a contrary [a perverse] person.
prog
〔わざと逆らう性質〕perversity, a warped personality; 〔人〕a perverse [contrary] person, a cross-grained person
eij
あまのじゃくな
【形】
    perverse（人が）

restoring 'perverse'

@@ -19,0 +20,3 @@
+<gloss>perversity</gloss>
+<gloss>perverse person</gloss>
+<gloss>contrary person</gloss>
@@ -21 +23,0 @@
-<gloss>contrary person</gloss>

A weird non-displaying character got in after "polearm" which was screwing up later processing.

@@ -22 +22 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">polearm​ with a curved single-edged blade (similar to a glaive)</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">polearm with a curved single-edged blade (similar to a glaive)</gloss>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/薙刀

Naginatajutsu refers to the old-school martial art, different　to and separate from the modern sport of naginata.

To quote from the top of Japanese Wikipedia's article (above and before the actual article itself) on naginata (the weapon ...with a similar headnotes for the pages mentioned):
この項目では、武器としての薙刀について説明しています。
現代武道の薙刀については「なぎなた」をご覧ください。
古武道の薙刀については「薙刀術」をご覧ください。
(Kinda interesting how the art is typically written with hiragana, to distinguish the two, at least in writing. Just when I though that should be noted, I notice that a [uk]-tag has already been added. Nice)

@@ -28 +27,0 @@
-<gloss>naginatajutsu</gloss>

@@ -26 +26,4 @@
-<gloss>the art of using a naginata</gloss>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>naginata</gloss>
+<gloss>naginatajutsu</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">martial art of wielding the naginata</gloss>

Need to watch your phone inserting new-line characters, Marcus. If you put a line-break between words it will be OK.

@@ -22 +22 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">polearm​ with a curved single- edged blade (similar to a glaive)</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">polearm​ with a curved single-edged blade (similar to a glaive)</gloss>

Actually, I can't seem to find a source, written in Japanese, mention the term "atarashii naginata"... (not that I've done more than a quick search, mind you)

I think most of us regard it as one sense.

just because the meaning for something doesn't match the first gloss doesn't mean that additional senses are needed.  and it's not clear how additional senses would even help.  if it's not clear which gloss in sense 1 a particular example matches, how would it immediately become clear if an example matches sense 1 or sense 2 if the glosses are split?

is there any support for multiple senses from any other source?

i still think this is just one sense, as per all sources i see

In the quoted sentence:
"同署は勤務管理の状況などについて、関係者から事情
を聴く方針。"
I agree it's an issue the first word 
suggested for the 方針 here is "policy", 
because it's wrong and could be 
misunderstood to mean "the police have a 
general policy of hearing everybody 
involved" (which they probably do, but 
that's not what the sentence says). If we 
had two senses, we'd get around that.

i agree with Robin.  all japanese dictionaries have this as a single sense, as does gg5.  i don't see what splitting would really accomplish

Could we maybe split along the terms of "long-term" and "short term"? I.e. something like

[1][n]
plan (of action); course; direction
[2][n]
policy; objective; (guiding) principle

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -19,0 +20 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

無理強い	81966
無理じい	2154

@@ -7,0 +8,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>無理じい</keb>

gg5, prog

I think this is clearer.

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<gloss>forcing</gloss>
@@ -18,3 +19,2 @@
-<gloss>insistence</gloss>
-<gloss>pressure</gloss>
-<gloss>extortion</gloss>
+<gloss>coercion</gloss>
+<gloss>pushing (to do)</gloss>

Could this gloss be improved, maybe?

I don't see the need for "full name". It's not in the JEs.

@@ -22 +21,0 @@
-<gloss>full name</gloss>

Moving x-ref to correct sense.

@@ -21,2 +20,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1604730">名字</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1375190">姓・せい・1</xref>
@@ -27,0 +26 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1604730">名字</xref>

@@ -21,1 +21,1 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1604730">苗字</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1604730">名字</xref>

慇懃	16889
慇懃に	5279	  
慇懃な	4538
慇懃を	182
慇懃が	70

I think sense 1 should be glossed as an adjective.

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
@@ -12,4 +13,3 @@
-<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
-<gloss>politeness</gloss>
-<gloss>courtesy</gloss>
-<gloss>civility</gloss>
+<gloss>polite</gloss>
+<gloss>courteous</gloss>
+<gloss>civil</gloss>

gg5, daij

Splitting into senses.

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -11,0 +13,5 @@
+<gloss>politeness</gloss>
+<gloss>courtesy</gloss>
+<gloss>civility</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
@@ -13,2 +19 @@
-<gloss>courtesy</gloss>
-<gloss>intimacy</gloss>
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
@@ -15,0 +21 @@
+<gloss>(sexual) intimacy</gloss>

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<gloss>cosmopolite</gloss>

Daijr (splits senses), GG5, etc. (the JEs usu. only have sense 1.)

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>international celebrity</gloss>
+<gloss>internationally-minded person</gloss>
@@ -19,0 +20,4 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>international celebrity</gloss>
+</sense>

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&anat;</field>

GG5, etc.

Clearer.

@@ -11,0 +12,2 @@
+<gloss>spermatic duct</gloss>
+<gloss>vas deferens</gloss>

GG5

@@ -16,0 +17,2 @@
+<gloss>roar</gloss>
+<gloss>bellow</gloss>

吼え声	1798
吠え声	14525

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>吼え声</keb>
+<keb>吠え声</keb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<keb>吠え声</keb>
+<keb>吼え声</keb>

故あって	18946
故有って	444
ゆえあって	3346

Indeed.

https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=故あって

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>故あって</keb>
+</k_ele>

gg5, prog

I don't like "practically immediately after" as a gloss.

@@ -25 +25 @@
-<gloss>practically immediately after</gloss>
+<gloss>without a moment's delay</gloss>

GG5: 間髪をいれず 〔即座に〕 in (less than) no time; quick as a flash
間髪を入れず	14839
間髪を容れず	703
間髪をいれず	4586

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<keb>間髪を容れず</keb>
+<keb>間髪をいれず</keb>
@@ -11 +11 @@
-<keb>間髪をいれず</keb>
+<keb>間髪を容れず</keb>
@@ -21,0 +22,2 @@
+<gloss>immediately</gloss>
+<gloss>instantly</gloss>
@@ -23 +24,0 @@
-<gloss>instantly</gloss>

"In a flash", "in no time" sounds like they describe the rapid speed of the action that follows, when the expression is only about the immediacy of its beginning. This is why I removed them.

大辞泉 + 大辞林

I believe this is only used to describe the - lack of a - pause between a sequence of events, such as a question (event 1) and a response (event 2).

@@ -22,2 +22,3 @@
-<gloss>in no time</gloss>
-<gloss>in a flash</gloss>
+<gloss>with nary a pause</gloss>
+<gloss>instantly</gloss>
+<gloss>practically immediately after</gloss>

Too many brackets...

専門分野	794080
spec1?

@@ -12,3 +12,3 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<gloss>(one's) (special) field (of study)</gloss>
-<gloss>one's line</gloss>
+<gloss>area of expertise</gloss>
+<gloss>(one's) field</gloss>
+<gloss>(one's) line</gloss>

Adding yoji tags based on gakken, shinmeikai and-or jitenon
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<misc>&yoji;</misc>

意識朦朧	25870
意識もうろう	8504

Not considered yoji, right?

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>意識もうろう</keb>
@@ -13 +15,0 @@
-<misc>&yoji;</misc>

Kanji Haitani list

Adding yoji tagAdding yoji tag
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<misc>&yoji;</misc>

Entry created

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss>person who only dates foreigners</gloss>
+<gloss>person who only dates (non-Asian) foreigners</gloss>

ウィキペディア小見出し辞書 (weblio=  "性的嗜好として、主に欧米系の白人を好むこと。"
hatena: "同性愛者の世界でも伝統的に認知の高い概念であるが、一般的にはいわゆる白人や黒人の男性*1を好む女性に対して用いられることが圧倒的大多数である。"

Nicolas suggested 外人ハンター as an entry. it's not common in Japanese (nothing in the ngrams, ~4000 googits) but seems common in (expat) 
English (144k googits).

@@ -14 +14,4 @@
-<gloss>person who dates only foreigners</gloss>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<s_inf>abbr. of 外(国)人専門</s_inf>
+<gloss>gaijin hunter</gloss>
+<gloss>person who only dates foreigners</gloss>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/ゲイ用語
http://d.hatena.ne.jp/keyword/����
google image hits

there seems to be a strong association with this term applying to gay males who are attracted to white men

I doubt it's [uk], but if it were I'm sure it'd be written in 
katakana rather than hiragana.
_
"person who is physically attracted to foreigners" is odd as I 
think most people (not only Japanese) are physically attracted 
to foreigners (of all races)

@@ -12,3 +12,2 @@
-<misc>&uk;</misc>
-<misc>&vulg;</misc>
-<gloss>person physically attracted to foreigners</gloss>
+<misc>&derog;</misc>
+<misc>&sl;</misc>

This is a fork.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nakiri_bōchō
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usuba_bōchō

These are some other rectangular bladed knives, that are not and could not be used as cleavers. (in much the same way, that cleavers could not be used as なた)

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>sturdy rectangular-bladed knife, used in woodcraft and hunting</gloss>
+<gloss>sturdy broad-bladed knife, used in woodcraft and hunting</gloss>

https://kitanodaichihamidorinariki.naturum.ne.jp/c20207447.html
http://www.hounen.co.jp/nata.htm
https://toyokuni.net/aa_images/kei/2007/shikoku_turukirinata/turukirinata.jpg
https://store.shopping.yahoo.co.jp/honmamon/4580149743151.html

Whilst I agree that the most "typical"/"normal" なた is superficially somewhat similar to a cleaver　(though not nearly as broad), a fundamental defining characteristic of a cleaver is still that it is a butcher/kitchen knife. (and again, the many significant differences I mentioned before)
There are many knives that a layman wouldn't be able to tell apart, just to look at them, that are nevertheless in very distinct and different categories. (the same applies to, e.g., axes)

...and many なた do not have that distinctive rectangular shape, as is clear from the references I mention. Note that 剣鉈 and 鉈鎌 are types of 鉈.

To me, the distinctive feature of a なた is the cleaver-like rectangular blade. (When I showed a picture several nata to my wife and asked her what she'd call them, she said "a cleaver".)

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>type of sturdy broad bladed knife, used in woodcraft and hunting.</gloss>
+<gloss>sturdy rectangular-bladed knife, used in woodcraft and hunting</gloss>

A cleaver is a butcher/kitchen knife.
It has a completely different purpose and also possess very different blades, to a nata. A lot broader blade (a lot broader than the handle, notably) and though they are relatively thick and sturdy, they are significantly less so, than a nata. A lot of typical uses of a nata (especially splitting wood), would utterly ruin any cleaver.
The closest thing to a nata, would be a machete or a hunting knife. (and ken'nata do look like the latter, as well as being used as such, in addition to its other uses)
It is neither, however, so it would be wrong to call it such.

The angle is notable (though not universal/required), but I guess it's not really necessary to mention.
Also the blade is often of uniform breadth (basically a rectangle) aside from ken'nata (剣鉈), which have a more typical knife shape as well as usually being straight, but the same applies to that, so no need to mention it either, I suppose.
Speaking of which: Adding an entry for 剣鉈 may be a good idea.

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>type of cleaver used in woodcraft and hunting</gloss>
+<gloss>type of sturdy broad bladed knife, used in woodcraft and hunting.</gloss>

To work better with the ken'nata entry

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">sturdy broad-bladed knife, used in woodcraft and hunting</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">sturdy broad-bladed knife, used in woodcraft and hunting (often with a rectangular blade)</gloss>

I don't think the "type of" contributes anything.

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">type of sturdy broad-bladed knife, used in woodcraft and hunting</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">sturdy broad-bladed knife, used in woodcraft and hunting</gloss>

I'm fine either way, though I lean towards just having the description.

I'm not a big fan of "type of..." expl glosses as the only gloss. I think it's better to include the Japanese term first in entries like 
these.
(I wouldn't mind "nata knife" or "nata machete" but "nata" by itself is perhaps "cleaner")

@@ -16 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>type of sturdy broad-bladed knife, used in woodcraft and hunting</gloss>
+<gloss>nata</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">type of sturdy broad-bladed knife, used in woodcraft and hunting</gloss>

ＫＯＤ追加語彙: shut [freeze, leave] sb out; give sb the cold shoulder; cold-shoulder; 《英》
send sb to Coventry.

I like it. BrE.

@@ -11,0 +12,2 @@
+<gloss>to freeze out</gloss>
+<gloss>to send to Coventry</gloss>

it's cute but not all that common

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<misc>&col;</misc>
@@ -11 +11,0 @@
-<gloss>to send to Coventry</gloss>

Entry created

daijs

I don't think "number-crunching" or "taking tally" are right.

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>数合せ</keb>
@@ -16,2 +18,0 @@
-<gloss>taking tally</gloss>
-<gloss>number-crunching</gloss>

GG5

@@ -12,0 +12,4 @@
+<gloss>making the numbers balance</gloss>
+<gloss>fixing the numbers</gloss>
+<gloss>number-juggling</gloss>
+<gloss>making up the numbers (e.g. to form a majority)</gloss>

http://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/srch/all/数合わせ/m1u/

Promote from WI1.

Suggesting "taking tally" as a possible Enlgish translation based on usage and above reference.

Encountered in an Asahi article on the prime minster vote yesterday:

「…」、またぞろ親小沢と脱小沢の～だ。

Fork. I'll add these remarks to the main line.

味覚の秋 
食欲の秋 
実りの秋　
スポーツの秋
芸術の秋
行楽の秋
豊の秋  
麦の秋  
月の秋  


These expressions are also common, and many of them have entries in Daijisen/Daijirin

GG5, 中辞典
G-n-grams: 読書の秋	72703

Far from obvious.

@@ -11,2 +11,3 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>reading in autumn</gloss>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<misc>&id;</misc>
+<gloss>autumn, the best season for reading</gloss>

weblio

Not a good gloss but this is definitely somewhat idiomatic; over 1k ngrams in kyoto/melbourne. There are other "〜の秋" expressions too.

(if they weren't nouns, and we hadn't decided against tagging yojijukugo with the proverb tag, I might have tagged it as such)

I don't think these are idioms, by the way. It means exactly what it says on the tin, I'd say.

@@ -13 +12,0 @@
-<misc>&id;</misc>

I'll add them.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>

Google n-gram counts:
味覚の秋	11325  <- Daijr, 中辞典
食欲の秋	178737 <- GG5
実りの秋	48068  <- GG5, 中辞典
スポーツの秋	65034  <- GG5
芸術の秋	66042
行楽の秋	7514
豊の秋	2805  < Daijr
麦の秋	3665  <- Daijr "「麦秋(ばくしゆう)」に同じ。"
月の秋	3880

Reopening. Someone may like to look at the more common of these.

I agree it's cultural/usage and we can't stretch a dictionary to handling it. I'll close and reopen as the following was added in a fork.

味覚の秋 
食欲の秋 
実りの秋　
スポーツの秋
芸術の秋
行楽の秋
豊の秋  
麦の秋  
月の秋  

These expressions are also common, and many of them have entries in Daijisen/Daijirin

爆発炎上	46902

Yes, it's the sum of the first senses of both parts, but I feel it's common enough to record. It should have had "exploding".

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>bursting into flames</gloss>
+<gloss>exploding in flames</gloss>

https://www.afpbb.com/articles/-/3205526
https://www.reuters.com/video/2018/08/07/イタリアでタンクローリーが爆発・炎上-影響で高速道路崩落字幕・6日?videoId=452232963
https://www.msn.com/ja-jp/news/world/米サンフランシスコでガス管が爆発・炎上/ar-BBThaUq
http://www.news24.jp/articles/2018/08/07/10400764.html

I don't think these glosses work because there's no mention of the "爆発" part. "Bursting into flames" doesn't usually imply an explosion.
I question if we need this entry at all. It literally means "exploding and going up in flames" and I note that it's often written as "爆発・炎上" (see examples above).

@@ -13,2 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>bursting in flames</gloss>
-<gloss>sudden explosive fire</gloss>
+<gloss>bursting into flames</gloss>
+<gloss>erupting in flames</gloss>

https://ejje.weblio.jp/sentence/content/"爆発炎上"

OK. I'll let it go at that. I'll align ピアス穴.

I don't think "other than the ear" is correct considering the google results for "ear piercing"
also I don't think ピアスホール exclusively refers to a piercing made in the 耳たぶ, I think that's 
just daijr being very sloppy.

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<gloss>piercing</gloss>
+<gloss>piercing (esp. in the ear)</gloss>

Daijirin (ピアスホール): ピアス穴。ピアスをつけるために耳たぶに開けた穴。
That unreferenced definition of "piecing" seems to be from https://www.lexico.com/en/definition/piercing  
It's a bit problematic here ("typically other than the ears") as ピアスホール usually applies to the 耳たぶ, as mentioned in Daijirin. I think the gloss needs to mention both the ears and jewellery (since that's the main meaning of ピアス.)

piercing 
noun
1.
a small hole in a part of the body, typically other than the ears, made so as to insert a ring, stud, or other piece of jewellery.

@@ -14 +14,2 @@
-<gloss>hole in one's body (usu. ear) for attaching jewellery (jewelry)</gloss>
+<gloss>piercing</gloss>
+<gloss>piercing hole</gloss>

Daijr
ピアスホール	36820

Aligning.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>piercing</gloss>
+<gloss>piercing (esp. in the ear)</gloss>

@@ -14 +14,2 @@
-<gloss>hole in one's body (usu. ear) for attaching jewellery (jewelry)</gloss>
+<gloss>piercing</gloss>
+<gloss>piercing hole</gloss>

ピアスホール	36820
ピアス穴	11908
Daijr: mentions it in the ピアスホール entry.

ＫＯＤ追加語彙

Not sure OCTG works here. It would need to be expanded to "Oil country tubular goods", but that would be messy.

@@ -13 +12,0 @@
-<gloss>OCTG</gloss>

daijs
https://www.spi-information.com/report/14276.html
https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jcorr/60/4/60_4_190/_pdf

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<misc>&obsc;</misc>

daijs

ワンイシュー政党	No matches
単一争点政党	31

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2841048">ワンイシュー政党</xref>

Daijr

daijs

外人ハンター	No matches
外人専門	419
外専	2097
ガイセン	509

Needs better references than just a link 
to google.

Not in the usual refs, but gets a fair amount of hits https://www.google.com/search?hl=ja&ei=LMtAXar8OJzWmAXdsKKYCA&q="外人ハンター"&oq="外人ハンター"&gs_l=psy-ab.3...32734.33395..33642...0.0..0.176.287.0j2......0....1..gws-wiz.mwuKoEnIe84&ved=0ahUKEwiqwtnh3t3jAhUcK6YKHV2YCIMQ4dUDCAo&uact=5

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<field>&internet;</field>

I don't think it's slang.

@@ -9,2 +8,0 @@
-<misc>&sl;</misc>
-<lsource xml:lang="eng">Instagrammer</lsource>

I think this is enough.

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<gloss>Instagram user with a lot of followers and influence</gloss>

daijs, jitsuyo

Bulk addition of vi and vt from Meikyo
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -17,0 +19 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

Should the gai1 from the original entry maybe have moved here?

GG5: クラッチをミートさせる 【機】 ＝クラッチを入れる[つなぐ]

Splitting the "meet" sense(s) away from the "meat" one.

Daijr, ＫＯＤ追加語彙

It is a noun, although it's mostly prenominal. We usually don't have both "adj-no" and "adj-f".

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -12,2 +13 @@
-<pos>&adj-f;</pos>
-<gloss>oil-soluble</gloss>
+<gloss>oil solubility</gloss>

daijr, eij
油溶性	18780

(I copied the pos from Nicolas' ~の秋 
submission before I realized I didn't 
think id was right)

@@ -13 +12,0 @@
-<misc>&id;</misc>

why is this one marked id?  as i recall, the others were not...

味覚の秋	11325  <- Daijr, 中辞典, eij
食欲の秋	178737 <- GG5
実りの秋	48068  <- GG5, 中辞典
スポーツの秋	65034  <- GG5
芸術の秋	66042
行楽の秋	7514
豊の秋	2805  < Daijr%
麦の秋	3665  <- Daijr "「麦秋(ばくしゆう)」に同じ。"
月の秋	3880

味覚の秋	11325  <- Daijr, 中辞典, eij
食欲の秋	178737 <- GG5, daijs
実りの秋	48068  <- GG5, 中辞典
スポーツの秋	65034  <- GG5
芸術の秋	66042
行楽の秋	7514
豊の秋	2805  < Daijr%
麦の秋	3665  <- Daijr "「麦秋(ばくしゆう)」に同じ。"
月の秋	3880

味覚の秋	11325  <- Daijr, 中辞典, eij
食欲の秋	178737 <- GG5, daijs
実りの秋	48068  <- GG5, 中辞典, daijs
スポーツの秋	65034  <- GG5
芸術の秋	66042
行楽の秋	7514
豊の秋	2805  < Daijr%
麦の秋	3665  <- Daijr "「麦秋(ばくしゆう)」に同じ。"
月の秋	3880

it's in gg5 as an example of 秋:
読書[スポーツ]の秋　(the) autumn, the (best) time [season] for reading [sport(s)]

seems pointless, but it's in daijs, so...

味覚の秋	11325  <- Daijr, 中辞典, eij
食欲の秋	178737 <- GG5, daijs
実りの秋	48068  <- GG5, 中辞典, daijs
スポーツの秋	65034  <- GG5 (according to Jim - I could not find in my version of GG5), daijs
芸術の秋	66042
行楽の秋	7514
豊の秋	2805  < Daijr%
麦の秋	3665  <- Daijr "「麦秋(ばくしゆう)」に同じ。"
月の秋	3880

oops

i have no idea why this needs to be a thing because it's clearly covered by 秋, but it is indeed an entry in multiple dictionaries

味覚の秋	11325  <- Daijr, 中辞典, eij
食欲の秋	178737 <- GG5, daijs
実りの秋	48068  <- GG5, 中辞典, daijs
スポーツの秋	65034  <- GG5 (according to Jim - I could not find in my version of GG5), daijs
芸術の秋	66042  <- daijs
行楽の秋	7514
豊の秋	2805  < Daijr%
麦の秋	3665  <- Daijr "「麦秋(ばくしゆう)」に同じ。"
月の秋	3880

Never knew how crazy the Japanese were about the autumn, I guess.

味覚の秋	11325  <- Daijr, 中辞典, eij
食欲の秋	178737 <- GG5, daijs
実りの秋	48068  <- GG5, 中辞典, daijs
スポーツの秋	65034  <- GG5 (according to Jim - I could not find in my version of GG5), daijs
芸術の秋	66042  <- daijs
行楽の秋	7514 (skipping this one)
豊の秋	2805  < Daijr, daijs
麦の秋	3665  <- Daijr "「麦秋(ばくしゆう)」に同じ。"
月の秋	3880

This one is a little different from the others

味覚の秋	11325  <- Daijr, 中辞典, eij
食欲の秋	178737 <- GG5, daijs
実りの秋	48068  <- GG5, 中辞典, daijs
スポーツの秋	65034  <- GG5 (according to Jim - I could not find in my version of GG5), daijs
芸術の秋	66042  <- daijs
行楽の秋	7514 (skipping this one)
豊の秋	2805  < Daijr, daijs
麦の秋	3665  <- Daijr "「麦秋(ばくしゆう)」に同じ。"
月の秋	3880 <- nikk, 季語・季題辞典  (weblio)

This one is a little different from the others - it's not "autumn, the best season to view the moon", but "_a specific_ autumn when 
the moon is beautiful", or at least that's how I interpret nikk etc.

Worth having; meaning not obvious.

eij
年の取り方
how to grow old

いい年の取り方をする
age gracefully


年の取り方	9260
歳の取り方	5697
I often hear this as いい歳の取り方（をしている）

Maybe not obvious/worth having?

https://www.syoha.jp/ (their official website)
at the bottom: © 2022 NHK Party. All Rights Reserved.

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>NHK Party</gloss>

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>エヌエイチケイからこくみんをまもるとう</reb>
+<reb>エヌエイチケーからこくみんをまもるとう</reb>
@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>NHK Kara Kokumin wo Mamoru To (political party)</gloss>
+<gloss>NHK Kara Kokumin wo Mamoru Tō (political party)</gloss>

since they're in the upper house...

https://www.syoha.jp/ (their official website)
at the bottom: © 2022 NHK Party. All Rights Reserved.

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<gloss>NHK Party</gloss>

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<gloss>NHK Kara Kokumin wo Mamoru To (political party)</gloss>
+<gloss>NHK Kara Kokumin wo Mamoru Tō (political party)</gloss>

since they're in the upper house... this abbr is very common in the media
https://www.newsweekjapan.jp/stories/world/2019/07/nhk-2.php
https://www.sankei.com/west/news/190731/wst1907310028-n1.html
https://news.tv-asahi.co.jp/news_politics/articles/000160956.html
even on NHK's site:
https://www.nhk.or.jp/senkyo/database/sangiin/2019/00/hmb12_211.html

Bulk convert ling to gramm
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<field>&ling;</field>
+<field>&gramm;</field>

GG5: the recent past; 【文法】 〔イタリア語の〕 the present perfect.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1196030">過去・3</xref>
@@ -13,0 +15 @@
+<gloss>present perfect</gloss>

nikk (sense 2)
saw as a translation of the Italian "passato prossimo" in a Japanese book on Italian language
"passato prossimo" is sometimes translated as "present perfect tense" but I didn't feel entirely comfortable putting that in

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1196030">過去・かこ・3</xref>

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&ling;</field>

saw in book on Italian grammar
plenty of results on google

遠過去	1017

Maybe worth including.

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<gloss g_type="expl">time spent by a baby on their stomach while awake</gloss>

daijs, wiki

タミータイム	210
the google dictionary suggested "time spent by a baby on their stomach while awake" (if we need an expl, I mean)

GG5

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&sports;</field>

https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=壁打ち

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 間髪入れず　　 │ 61,014 │ 67.7% │
│ 間髪いれず　　 │ 28,621 │ 31.8% │
│ 間髪容れず　　 │    393 │  0.4% │ 🡠 sK
│ かんはついれず │      0 │  0.0% │
│ かんぱついれず │     90 │  0.1% │
╰─ーーーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

Aligning.

@@ -26 +26 @@
-<gloss>practically immediately after</gloss>
+<gloss>without a moment's delay</gloss>

間髪入れず	61014
間髪容れず	393
間髪いれず	28621

Aligning.

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<keb>間髪容れず</keb>
+<keb>間髪いれず</keb>
@@ -11 +11 @@
-<keb>間髪いれず</keb>
+<keb>間髪容れず</keb>
@@ -22,0 +23,2 @@
+<gloss>immediately</gloss>
+<gloss>instantly</gloss>
@@ -24 +25,0 @@
-<gloss>instantly</gloss>

https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=間髪入れず

Merging.

@@ -13,0 +14,4 @@
+<sense>
+<misc>&place;</misc>
+<gloss>14927 Satoshi (asteroid)</gloss>
+</sense>

弥 is the wrong kanji

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Kusama Yayoi (1929.03.22-; artist)</gloss>
+<gloss>Yayoi Kusama (1929.03.22-; artist)</gloss>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Kusama Yayoi</gloss>
+<gloss>Kusama Yayoi (1929.03.22-; artist)</gloss>

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<misc>&given;</misc>
+<misc>&male;</misc>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/玉林
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hluPcp_8FYY (~2:20)

Merge with existing 聡/さとし entry.

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/聡_(小惑星)

@@ -1,3 +1,2 @@
-<ent_seq>2841041</ent_seq>
-<ent_corp>jmdict</ent_corp>
+<ent_corp>jmnedict</ent_corp>
@@ -11 +10 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&organization;</misc>

https://natgeo.nikkeibp.co.jp/atcl/news/16/062300234/

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&person;</misc>

jwiki