Daijirin

@@ -15,0 +16,4 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>hem (of trousers, skirt, etc.)</gloss>
+</sense>

大辞林

@@ -11,0 +12,4 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>lower garment (e.g. jeans, slacks, skirt, etc.)</gloss>
+</sense>

More correct.

Snappier?

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>to pull one's self together</gloss>
+<gloss>to pull oneself together</gloss>

GG5

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<gloss>to regain control (of oneself)</gloss>

https://kotobank.jp/word/気を取り直す-471912

@@ -16 +15,0 @@
-<gloss>to completely rethink</gloss>
@@ -17,0 +17 @@
+<gloss>to collect oneself (after a failure)</gloss>

gg5, daij

@@ -16 +16,6 @@
-<gloss>slide projector</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1073760">スライド・1</xref>
+<gloss>slide (used for projection)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2841017">幻灯機</xref>

Correct POS order
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
@@ -18 +18,0 @@
-<pos>&vt;</pos>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

Daijr, GG5, etc.

Yes, it now covers free subscriptions, although the kanji mean "buy+read".

@@ -18 +18,3 @@
-<gloss>paid subscription (e.g. magazine)</gloss>
+<gloss>buying and reading (book, magazine, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>subscribing (incl. free subscriptions)</gloss>
+<gloss>taking (e.g. newspaper)</gloss>

I just unsubscribed from an email newsletter and saw this kanji. The wording should be tweaked because it's not necessarily only paid subscriptions.

gg5 daijs

"firm" by itself is misleading, "trading firm" would work, but I think "trading company" suffices

@@ -19 +18,0 @@
-<gloss>firm</gloss>

Policy: "where a Japanese term or name is commonly used in English, such as "tofu" and "judo", macrons would typically not be included on the long vowels."

I guess "dojo" falls over the "commonly used in English" line. Annoys me a bit.

* OED: https://www.lexico.com/definition/dojo
* M-W: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/dojo
* Collins: https://www.collinsdictionary.com/us/dictionary/english/dojo
* Cambridge: https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/dojo

Quite common to see places named these in American cities these days.

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<gloss>dōjō</gloss>
+<gloss>dojo</gloss>

@@ -18 +18,2 @@
-<gloss>dojo (hall used for martial arts training)</gloss>
+<gloss>dōjō</gloss>
+<gloss>hall used for martial arts training</gloss>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

GG5, etc.

Yes.

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<gloss>coming to the surface</gloss>

"coming (up) to the surface", naybe?

@@ -20,0 +21 @@
+<pos>&n-suf;</pos>

Daijr, GG5, etc.

I think this is one sense. Daijirin's second sense concerns an obscure point in Buddhism.

@@ -23,4 +23,2 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
+<gloss>determined</gloss>
+<gloss>intent</gloss>
@@ -27,0 +26 @@
+<gloss>straightforward</gloss>

大辞林

@@ -23,0 +24,7 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
+<gloss>single-minded</gloss>
+<gloss>devoted to</gloss>
+<gloss>doing nothing but</gloss>
+</sense>

OK

Our entry for 摑み has [oK]; I assume that applies here too.

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
| 鷲掴み　　 | 100,296 | 39.9% |
| 鷲づかみ　 |  28,289 | 11.3% |
| わし掴み　 |  10,860 |  4.3% |
| ワシ掴み　 |   5,686 |  2.3% |
| わしづかみ |  96,516 | 38.4% |
| ワシづかみ |   4,038 |  1.6% | <- too common to drop, I think

| 鷲摑み　　 |   2,692 |  1.1% | <- daijr, mk, oukoku; adding
| 鷲摑　　　 |   2,821 |  1.1% | <- appears to overlap with 鷲摑み
| わし摑み　 |      96 |  0.0% |
| ワシ摑み　 |      25 |  0.0% |

@@ -15,0 +16,4 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>鷲摑み</keb>
+<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
@@ -18,3 +21,0 @@
-<re_restr>鷲掴み</re_restr>
-<re_restr>鷲づかみ</re_restr>
-<re_restr>わし掴み</re_restr>
@@ -24 +25 @@
-<re_restr>ワシ掴み</re_restr>
+<re_nokanji/>

わし掴み	10860

I think that's OK.

@@ -10,0 +11,3 @@
+<keb>わし掴み</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -16,0 +20 @@
+<re_restr>わし掴み</re_restr>

鷲掴み　　	100296
鷲づかみ　	28289
ワシ掴み　	5686
ワシづかみ	4038

How do I add ワシづかみ as a form?

@@ -9,0 +10,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ワシ掴み</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -11,0 +15,6 @@
+<re_restr>鷲掴み</re_restr>
+<re_restr>鷲づかみ</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ワシづかみ</reb>
+<re_restr>ワシ掴み</re_restr>

@@ -12,2 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>a political organization</gloss>
-<gloss>a political organisation</gloss>
+<gloss>political organization</gloss>
+<gloss>political organisation</gloss>

GG5 has 例え話. I don't think it's ik.

譬え話	3222
たとえ話	64573
譬話	786
例え話	53260
タトエ話	79

but daijs etc. only have 譬え話 (found only 
one entry (daijs+) containing 例え話). is 
例え ik with this meaning?

@@ -3,0 +4,6 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>たとえ話</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>例え話</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -8,3 +13,0 @@
-<keb>たとえ話</keb>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
@@ -12,3 +14,0 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>例え話</keb>

GG5

On raw Googits this is more common than 譬え話, but GG5 is the only ref that has it.

@@ -12,0 +13,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>例え話</keb>
+</k_ele>

Agree. Not a polearm.

When it comes to nagamaki, there is no pole involved. Just a perfectly normal (if long) sword hilt. They are no different to any other Japanese sword, other than the hilt length

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>polearm with sword blade</gloss>
+<gloss>sword with a very long grip</gloss>

While the term means sons it's used more widely.

@@ -32 +32 @@
-<gloss>phone scam in which the perpetrator typically pretends to be the son of the fraud victim</gloss>
+<gloss>phone scam involving calls from pretended relatives in distress</gloss>

@@ -32 +32 @@
-<gloss>type of fraud involving phone calls pretending distress</gloss>
+<gloss>phone scam in which the perpetrator typically pretends to be the son of the fraud victim</gloss>

@@ -13,0 +14,3 @@
+<keb>俺おれ詐欺</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -23,0 +27 @@
+<re_restr>俺おれ詐欺</re_restr>

daijs

@@ -8,0 +9,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>俺俺詐欺</keb>
@@ -19,0 +23 @@
+<re_restr>俺俺詐欺</re_restr>

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

男友達	222852
男友だち	4668

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>男友だち</keb>

I agree. "Boyfriend" is misleading.

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<gloss>boyfriend</gloss>

But "boyfriend" implies "romantic partner" which 男友達 doesn't.

GG5, etc.

The JEs have "boyfriend". I can't see how that Eijiro version justifies removing it.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<gloss>boyfriend</gloss>

gg5

I think this is fine.

@@ -14,2 +14 @@
-<gloss>(UNESCO) World Heritage</gloss>
-<gloss>World Cultural and Natural Heritage</gloss>
+<gloss>World Heritage (site)</gloss>

@@ -14,2 +14,2 @@
-<gloss>World Heritage (cultural, natural, etc.)</gloss>
-<gloss>World Cultural and Natural Heritage (UNESCO)</gloss>
+<gloss>(UNESCO) World Heritage</gloss>
+<gloss>World Cultural and Natural Heritage</gloss>

G n-grams 3723949

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -8,0 +10 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

Entry created

This is a fork.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nakiri_bōchō
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usuba_bōchō

These are some other rectangular bladed knives, that are not and could not be used as cleavers. (in much the same way, that cleavers could not be used as なた)

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>sturdy rectangular-bladed knife, used in woodcraft and hunting</gloss>
+<gloss>sturdy broad-bladed knife, used in woodcraft and hunting</gloss>

https://kitanodaichihamidorinariki.naturum.ne.jp/c20207447.html
http://www.hounen.co.jp/nata.htm
https://toyokuni.net/aa_images/kei/2007/shikoku_turukirinata/turukirinata.jpg
https://store.shopping.yahoo.co.jp/honmamon/4580149743151.html

Whilst I agree that the most "typical"/"normal" なた is superficially somewhat similar to a cleaver　(though not nearly as broad), a fundamental defining characteristic of a cleaver is still that it is a butcher/kitchen knife. (and again, the many significant differences I mentioned before)
There are many knives that a layman wouldn't be able to tell apart, just to look at them, that are nevertheless in very distinct and different categories. (the same applies to, e.g., axes)

...and many なた do not have that distinctive rectangular shape, as is clear from the references I mention. Note that 剣鉈 and 鉈鎌 are types of 鉈.

To me, the distinctive feature of a なた is the cleaver-like rectangular blade. (When I showed a picture several nata to my wife and asked her what she'd call them, she said "a cleaver".)

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>type of sturdy broad bladed knife, used in woodcraft and hunting.</gloss>
+<gloss>sturdy rectangular-bladed knife, used in woodcraft and hunting</gloss>

A cleaver is a butcher/kitchen knife.
It has a completely different purpose and also possess very different blades, to a nata. A lot broader blade (a lot broader than the handle, notably) and though they are relatively thick and sturdy, they are significantly less so, than a nata. A lot of typical uses of a nata (especially splitting wood), would utterly ruin any cleaver.
The closest thing to a nata, would be a machete or a hunting knife. (and ken'nata do look like the latter, as well as being used as such, in addition to its other uses)
It is neither, however, so it would be wrong to call it such.

The angle is notable (though not universal/required), but I guess it's not really necessary to mention.
Also the blade is often of uniform breadth (basically a rectangle) aside from ken'nata (剣鉈), which have a more typical knife shape as well as usually being straight, but the same applies to that, so no need to mention it either, I suppose.
Speaking of which: Adding an entry for 剣鉈 may be a good idea.

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>type of cleaver used in woodcraft and hunting</gloss>
+<gloss>type of sturdy broad bladed knife, used in woodcraft and hunting.</gloss>

To work better with the ken'nata entry

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">sturdy broad-bladed knife, used in woodcraft and hunting</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">sturdy broad-bladed knife, used in woodcraft and hunting (often with a rectangular blade)</gloss>

I don't think the "type of" contributes anything.

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">type of sturdy broad-bladed knife, used in woodcraft and hunting</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">sturdy broad-bladed knife, used in woodcraft and hunting</gloss>

I'm fine either way, though I lean towards just having the description.

I'm not a big fan of "type of..." expl glosses as the only gloss. I think it's better to include the Japanese term first in entries like 
these.
(I wouldn't mind "nata knife" or "nata machete" but "nata" by itself is perhaps "cleaner")

@@ -16 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>type of sturdy broad-bladed knife, used in woodcraft and hunting</gloss>
+<gloss>nata</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">type of sturdy broad-bladed knife, used in woodcraft and hunting</gloss>

鉈鎌	595
なたがま	190
ナタガマ	43
GG5

@@ -9,0 +10,4 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ナタガマ</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>
+</r_ele>
@@ -12 +15,0 @@
-<misc>&uk;</misc>

Fascine knives can be very different, to natagama/billhooks (and "sickle-shaped tool with a sharp inner edge", is just a description of a billhook. I.e. it is a repetition of "billhook". No need to state it twice)
Also, it is, in no way, like an axe.
(At any rate, Japanese natagama are certainly no more axe-like, than any other billhook, which they are essentially identical to, so... Just "billhook" should suffice)

@@ -14,2 +13,0 @@
-<gloss>fascine knife</gloss>
-<gloss>sickle-shaped tool with a sharp inner edge, halfway between a knife and an axe</gloss>

Entry created

GG5

Makes more sense to me.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<gloss>temporary worker (dispatched from an agency)</gloss>

Entry created

actually, without further evidence, i'm treating "ticket shop" as wasei (as in daijisen), which means that it's inappropriate as a gloss

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<gloss>ticket shop</gloss>

the problem is that i've never said "ticket shop" or "ticket reseller" in my life, so comparing 金券ショップ="ticket shop" with 駅="station" makes no sense.

we can keep the existing gloss as expl

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<gloss g_type="expl">shop where one can buy and sell gift certificates, coupons, travel and concert tickets, etc.</gloss>

The previous gloss was more informative, yes, but "a regular stopping place on a public transportation route, especially one on a railroad 
line with a platform and often one or more buildings" wouldn't be an appropriate translation in a J-E for 駅

I think the previous version was much more informative, and aligned with 金券屋 and チケットショップ. My inclination is to reject this amendment (which has no references supporting it.)

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>shop where one can buy and sell gift certificates, coupons, travel and concert tickets, etc.</gloss>
+<gloss>ticket reseller</gloss>

GG5 & Eijiro examples.

@@ -17 +17,2 @@
-<gloss>very messy (of a floor)</gloss>
+<gloss>very messy</gloss>
+<gloss>(stuff) all over the place</gloss>

"ＪＲ品川駅前、足の踏み場もないほどの人で埋め尽くされた。"
https://www.nhk.or.jp/politics/articles/feature/20430.html
wider than just messy

koj

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>足の踏み場もない</keb>
+</k_ele>

daijs

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
@@ -13 +14,2 @@
-<gloss>There's no place to stand in</gloss>
+<gloss>very messy (of a floor)</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="lit">no space even for one's feet</gloss>

Entry created

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<misc>&hist;</misc>
@@ -16 +17 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">Edo period police and military force dedicated to suppressing anti-shogunate activities</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">Edo-period police and military force dedicated to suppressing anti-shogunate activities</gloss>

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>shogunate police and military force located in Kyoto and dedicated to suppressing anti-shogunate activities (Edo period)</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">Edo period police and military force dedicated to suppressing anti-shogunate activities</gloss>

wiki gg5 koj

Very limited pos clues.

@@ -11 +11,2 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<misc>&obsc;</misc>
@@ -13 +14 @@
-<gloss>being defeated</gloss>
+<gloss>(being) defeated</gloss>

n? "after a losing battle"? not a noun

koj daijs

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>defeated</gloss>
+<gloss>being defeated</gloss>

https://kotobank.jp/word/敗余-599435

大辞林 第三版の解説
はいよ【敗余】
戦いに敗れたあと。 「忽ちにして－の兵を収めつ／不如帰 蘆花」

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>martial arts dojo</gloss>
+<gloss>martial arts area (within a school, gym, etc.)</gloss>

https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=武道場

Specifically, one in a 体育館 or high school, not a stand alone one.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<re_nokanji/>

抜きネタ	372
ぬきねた	< 20
ヌキネタ	66

Not common.

@@ -8 +8,4 @@
-<reb>ぬきねた</reb>
+<reb>ぬきネタ</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ヌキネタ</reb>
@@ -12 +15,3 @@
-<gloss>Scoop, exclusive news</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1455040">特ダネ・とくダネ</xref>
+<gloss>scoop</gloss>
+<gloss>exclusive news</gloss>

http://www2.oita-press.co.jp/nie/glossary/

Similar to 特ダネ or 独自ダネ.

調整豆乳	28425
調製豆乳	5236

I'm not really sure these are synonyms. Letting it go for now.

栄養・生化学辞典 https://kotobank.jp/word/調製豆乳-769405
https://image.entabe.jp/upload/20180524/images/IMG_0405.jpg

One of these might be [ik]

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>調製豆乳</keb>

調整豆乳	28425

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>adjusted soy milk</gloss>
@@ -14 +14,0 @@
-<gloss>adjusted soymilk</gloss>

weblio, weblio reibun https://ejje.weblio.jp/content/調整豆乳

Very common in packaging labels

Fair comment. I think that edit is fine.

@@ -14,2 +14 @@
-<gloss>unprocessed soy milk</gloss>
-<gloss>untreated soy milk</gloss>
+<gloss>soy milk without additives</gloss>

https://www.kurashiru.com/articles/766a3882-c85b-44ed-a7e2-5e06f55856ca

I have doubts about "unprocessed" and "untreated" as suitable glosses for 無調整, for the following reasons: 1. soymilk is by nature a "processed" or "treated" food (it does not simply flow naturally out of the soybean into the bottle); 2. there exists a specific definition of "無調整豆乳" that mentions additives (see the reference link) - would "pure soy milk; soy milk without additives" be a suitable gloss?

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2841003">調整豆乳</xref>

weblio https://ejje.weblio.jp/content/無調整豆乳

G n-grams: 91799
https://www.linguee.com/english-japanese/search?source=auto&query=データ化

Very common. But I'm not sure if "digitization" is the right translation in every context.
---
Nicolas, please note that the source here is "和英河川・水資源用語集", not Weblio, which is just a collection of many different dictionaries and glossaries.
A single source from Weblio usually isn't enough to determine whether or not a word is worth adding. Please try to find more references to support your submissions.

@@ -11,0 +12,2 @@
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<gloss>digitization</gloss>

weblio https://ejje.weblio.jp/content/データ化

爆発炎上	46902

Yes, it's the sum of the first senses of both parts, but I feel it's common enough to record. It should have had "exploding".

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>bursting into flames</gloss>
+<gloss>exploding in flames</gloss>

https://www.afpbb.com/articles/-/3205526
https://www.reuters.com/video/2018/08/07/イタリアでタンクローリーが爆発・炎上-影響で高速道路崩落字幕・6日?videoId=452232963
https://www.msn.com/ja-jp/news/world/米サンフランシスコでガス管が爆発・炎上/ar-BBThaUq
http://www.news24.jp/articles/2018/08/07/10400764.html

I don't think these glosses work because there's no mention of the "爆発" part. "Bursting into flames" doesn't usually imply an explosion.
I question if we need this entry at all. It literally means "exploding and going up in flames" and I note that it's often written as "爆発・炎上" (see examples above).

@@ -13,2 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>bursting in flames</gloss>
-<gloss>sudden explosive fire</gloss>
+<gloss>bursting into flames</gloss>
+<gloss>erupting in flames</gloss>

https://ejje.weblio.jp/sentence/content/"爆発炎上"

Splitting out

@@ -7,3 +6,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>NK細胞</keb>
-</k_ele>
@@ -12,4 +8,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>エヌケーさいぼう</reb>
-<re_restr>NK細胞</re_restr>

Shouldn't this be 2 separate entries

GG5/Daijr

黄色ブドウ球菌	46351
黄色葡萄球菌	90

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&med;</field>

GG5

@@ -13 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>hemorrhagic (haemorrhagic) shock</gloss>
+<gloss>hemorrhagic shock</gloss>
+<gloss>haemorrhagic shock</gloss>

Several refs have it. I'll propose an entry.

GG5

「出血性」 is used in a bunch of compounds (but not standalone) as "hemorrhagic". Not sure if we should have an entry for it, or if it's already covered by 「出血」.

G n-grams:
出血性の	4290

@@ -11 +11,2 @@
-<pos>&adj-pn;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<field>&med;</field>

GG5, ＫＯＤ追加語彙

See comments on 2841021.

split from ナチュラルキラー細胞

Daijr

@@ -13 +12,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1490900">貧乏</xref>
@@ -14,0 +14 @@
+<s_inf>inversion of 貧乏(びんぼう)</s_inf>
@@ -15,0 +16,2 @@
+<gloss>poverty-stricken</gloss>
+<gloss>destitute</gloss>

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AoUZU9IyVL4
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/幸せ!ボンビーガール

死んじまう	12614
死んじまった	11147

But that's true for all -じまう conjugations, and and 死んじまえ doesn't particularly stand out as a very common construction.
ちまう； じまう is already an entry.

I don't think this contraction is very obvious, especially because this word can appear without any kanji at all, as "しんじまえ".

死んでしまえ	58084
死んじまえ	17156

飲んじまえ	372
飲んでしまえ	4202
飲んじまう	833
飲んじまった	4126

It's a contracted form of 死んでしまえ, less 
common than the non-contracted form. I 
don't think it's necessary.

https://nlab.itmedia.co.jp/nl/articles/1811/13/news086.html
https://thesaurus.weblio.jp/content/死んじまえ
https://www.bengo4.com/c_1009/b_662774/

Maybe Kansai dialect?

https://kw-note.com/internet-slang/chill/
https://meaning.jp/posts/1062
https://word-dictionary.jp/posts/1863

I think I'll add an entry for チルる as well.

@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+<misc>&sl;</misc>

Heard on Terrace House as "屋上でチルしよう”
"屋上チルか”

Reformat initialsms
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -7,0 +8,3 @@
+<reb>ディー・アイ・ワイ</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -8,0 +12 @@
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

daijs

GG5

"dispatch work" seems to be an AmE term. Never heard it used elsewhere.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<gloss>temporary labor</gloss>

https://www.nhk.or.jp/politics/articles/feature/20430.html
"...シングルマザーの派遣労働経験者"...

OK.

This gets fewer than 300 Japanese hits on Google. Given that 反 can come before any country's kanji abbreviation, I feel this is far too obscure to include.

反伯	31

https://www.nikkeyshimbun.jp/2007/070606-32brasil.html
https://www.nikkeyshimbun.jp/2004/040528-21brasil.html

Reading is presumed; chiefly used by the Japanese community in Brazil, so not bound to have many web hits.