@@ -13 +12,0 @@
-<re_pri>ichi1</re_pri>
@@ -16,0 +16 @@
+<re_nokanji/>

@@ -13,0 +14,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ダルい</reb>

Yes, I have  a problem with だりぃ being here, as it's clearly not the same POS. It's common enough to be recorded. I've proposed an entry for it.

@@ -18,5 +18,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>だりぃ</reb>
-<re_nokanji/>
-<re_inf>&ik;</re_inf>

I was thinking it might help in text glossing since it's a 
fairly common surface form, but I wouldn't mind having it 
taken out

i don't think だりぃ should be in here

"【１】「だるい」は、体の状態のみにいうが、「けだるい」「かったるい」は気分につ
いて用いられることもある。" / 類語例解辞典
http://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/leaf/thsrs/1385/m0u/

たるい is in daijs, daijr ("〔近世「たるい」とも〕")
__
"ダルい（-）とは、面倒くさくて……あれなことを言うんよ。以後、変換がダルいのでだ
るいと表記する。 (...) だるいの使い方
説明するのがだるい。
みたいに使うんだよ。わかった？"
http://ja.uncyclopedia.info/wiki/ダルい

"すげー暇だしどっか行きてぇ。けど雨だしな、外出んのだりぃ。"
https://twitter.com/_965tty/status/373997902281994240
_
"はぁ～講習会で有楽町とかマジだりぃ。終わったらいつもの秋葉原でも行くかな"
https://twitter.com/M_WisteriaField/status/37399706982588006
5
_
"奈良行くのだりぃｗｗｗ"
https://twitter.com/un1080/status/373996199998525440
_
"勉強だりぃーけど明日テストォォォォw"
https://twitter.com/kotone06171/status/373996946895015937
_
"本棚つくるのだりぃww"
https://twitter.com/KPPFM/status/373995707528527874
_
"試合だるぴ。"
https://twitter.com/da_toyo43/status/373998052157046784
_
"会長警報とかなんだよっ!!!だるっ。とっとと東京帰れっっ!!!バイトだるいなぁ...。
こーゆーのあるからめんどいんだよね(´･ω･`)"
https://twitter.com/di_bambino/status/373998020993363968
_
"また履歴書書くのかよ
学校だるーだる"
https://twitter.com/WagaWagayu/status/373999461858410496
_
"バイトだるーいwww
もーめんどくさーいwww"
https://twitter.com/ar23_52kkp/status/373999438135447552

daijs definition of だるい: "１ 疲れや病気などで、からだを動かすのがお
っくうである。かったるい。「高熱で全身が―・い」"
prog ex: "足がだるい"
eij ex: "だるい気分" "最近体がだるいんです" "全身がだるい" etc.
_
the correct usage of the word is usually to use the body, a 
body part or 気分 as the subject to be modified. to say 
school, homework, part-time work etc. is だるい seems to 
clearly fall outside the standard usage of the word. same 
for saying that doing something is だるい (e.g. "説明するのがだる
い" ""奈良行くのだりぃ" )
_
the twitter examples are all very "fresh" - all were posted 
in the past hour.

@@ -15,0 +15,9 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>たるい</reb>
+<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>だりぃ</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>
+<re_inf>&ik;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>
@@ -24,0 +33,7 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<misc>&sl;</misc>
+<gloss>bothersome</gloss>
+<gloss>tiresome</gloss>
+</sense>

”ちょっとめんどくさい時にすぐダルいって使うやついるけど 
あれ相当感じ悪くみえるわ。悪気はないんだろうけどな”
"ウザイとかダルイとか似たようなもんだろ 
なんで30代が理解できないんだよ"
http://www.logsoku.com/r/poverty/1327299208/

I think this kind of usage is pretty recent (and probably 
not just restricted to Kansai). We were talking to a middle-
aged policeman who arrived at the scene and when my friend 
mentioned in passing how the kids were saying "だるい", the 
policeman scoffed. 
I can't find too much online either but I guess it's fine 
just to record this instance of this usage in the comments 
for now.

koj, daij

i lived in osaka for five years, and i don't recall ever hearing this.  can't find any support in any of the standard refs or in a (brief) search online either.  nothing we can do unless a solid ref surfaces, i think

@@ -7,0 +7,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>懈い</keb>
@@ -16,1 +19,0 @@
-<gloss>feel heavy</gloss>
@@ -18,0 +20,2 @@
+<gloss>listless</gloss>
+<gloss>heavy (heart, legs, etc.)</gloss>

came across an interesting usage of this word today in 
Takatsuki, northern Osaka. I happened upon some kids (I'd 
guess around 12-y-o) who had accidentally started a fire in 
the reeds by the river. As the fire grew larger they kept 
saying ”だるい！だるい！ほんまだるい！"
to me it seemed like they were using it in place of "やばい" 
but my native-speaking friend who was with me suggested it 
was more like "めんどい" (though she wasn't necessarily all 
that familiar with this usage)

I think I too prefer one sense, as in the 州 entry.
I like "prefecture (of Japan)", etc. though. I think it's clearer.

@@ -20,5 +19,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
-<gloss>department (e.g. France)</gloss>
@@ -25,0 +21 @@
+<gloss>department (France)</gloss>

two senses seems about right to me

@@ -19 +19,8 @@
-<gloss>prefecture (Japan), department (e.g. France). county (China, Taiwan, Norway, etc.), province (Italy, Spain, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>prefecture (Japan)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
+<gloss>department (e.g. France)</gloss>
+<gloss>county (China, Taiwan, Norway, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>province (Italy, Spain, etc.)</gloss>

リーダーズ+プラス: サリー《イングランド南東部の内陸州 ...》
中辞典: 【地名】 Surrey 《英国イングランド南東部の州》.

I was coming around to that position too. They are not really separate senses; just a case of different countries using different terms.
BTW, it seems the UK's counties are 州; not 県.
I'll approve this and reopen for (doubtless) ongoing discussion.

@@ -19,21 +19 @@
-<gloss>prefecture (Japan)</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
-<gloss>county (China, Taiwan, Norway, etc.)</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
-<gloss>province (Italy, Spain, etc.)</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
-<gloss>department (e.g. France)</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
-<gloss>district (e.g. Portugal)</gloss>
+<gloss>prefecture (Japan), department (e.g. France). county (China, Taiwan, Norway, etc.), province (Italy, Spain, etc.)</gloss>

I think this is excessive. I'd just go with one sense.

Does this make sense? I think it'd be weird to not have "prefecture of Japan" as its own sense, but it turns out I think having everything 
else together in a single sense is a little unsightly...

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
@@ -22 +23 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1331840">州・しゅう・1</xref>
+<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
@@ -23,0 +25,4 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
@@ -24,0 +30,4 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
@@ -25,0 +35,4 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&n-suf;</pos>

OK

I agree it should be "state" (for Germany) and "canton" (for Switzerland) etc. in the 州 entry. I don't think "major national administrative 
units" is a good gloss because it's an explanatory gloss when real translations can be used.

Isn't it inconsistent to have Land, Kanton and oblast in the 州 entry, but "county" here for the Norwegian fylke, and "province" for the Italian provincia? I think we should stick to English translations (e.g. canton), and not attempt to list too many.
How about "major national administrative units, e.g. county, province, department, etc."

jwiki(県)

this wiki article has along list of 県 around the world

@@ -23 +23,4 @@
-<gloss>administrative unit of a country (county, department, province, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>county (China, Taiwan, Norway, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>province (Italy, Spain, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>department (e.g. France)</gloss>
+<gloss>district (e.g. Portugal)</gloss>

Maybe this works. There's a messy overlap with 州/しゅう. For example Canada's provinces are 州, not 県.

@@ -22,5 +22,2 @@
-<gloss>county (China and Taiwan)</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>department (France)</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1331840">州・しゅう・1</xref>
+<gloss>administrative unit of a country (county, department, province, etc.)</gloss>

Wikipedia lists Norwegian, Danish and Swedish counties (fylke/amt/län) as 県, and also Italian provinces (provincia). 
daij have separate senses for Japanese and Chinese 県.

Should this maybe be 2 senses, one "Japanese prefecture", the other "county; province; department"?

Not needed.

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<gloss>prefecture (of Japan)</gloss>
+<gloss>prefecture (Japan)</gloss>
@@ -22 +22 @@
-<gloss>county (of China and Taiwan)</gloss>
+<gloss>county (China and Taiwan)</gloss>
@@ -26 +26 @@
-<gloss>department (of France)</gloss>
+<gloss>department (France)</gloss>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/フランスの地方行政区画
see also 海外県 in daijs

@@ -23,0 +24,4 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>department (of France)</gloss>
+</sense>

@@ -22 +22 @@
-<gloss>county (of China)</gloss>
+<gloss>county (of China and Taiwan)</gloss>

@@ -11,0 +11,1 @@
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -16,0 +17,1 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

@@ -11,0 +11,1 @@
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -16,0 +17,1 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

@@ -25,0 +25,1 @@
+<xref type="ant" seq="1185200">下手・へた・1</xref>

chuujiten

@@ -23,0 +24 @@
+<gloss>grown-up</gloss>

大人	27911386
大人な	624485
大人の	10290308
大人の感じ	4817
大人の雰囲気	189009
大人な感じ	48246
大人な雰囲気	41831

g n-grams:
大人な感じ	48246	  
大人な雰囲気	41831  
大人な女性	9915	  
大人な味	9271	  
大人な人	8489	  
大人な対応	7969	  
大人なシステム	5509	  
大人なシステムヘルメット	5499	  
大人な気分	4909	  
大人な方	4687

@@ -21,0 +22 @@
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>

OK. I did wonder.

@@ -21 +21 @@
-<pos>&adj-pn;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

gg5
 大人の　adult; grown-up; 〔大人向けの〕 for adults

should it be adj-no (includes adj-pn) instead?

GG5 (has a separate sense when it's used prenominally.)

@@ -20,0 +21 @@
+<pos>&adj-pn;</pos>

入れる is also used as the verb for applying/inking a tattoo -- 入れ墨／刺青を入れる. It's probably a variant sense of "to set (a jewel, etc.)", but I don't really see it reflected in any of the definitions here.

g n-grams:
古創	46
古疵	112
古傷	71264

Reordering.

@@ -5 +5,3 @@
-<keb>古創</keb>
+<keb>古傷</keb>
+<ke_pri>news2</ke_pri>
+<ke_pri>nf32</ke_pri>
@@ -11,3 +13 @@
-<keb>古傷</keb>
-<ke_pri>news2</ke_pri>
-<ke_pri>nf32</ke_pri>
+<keb>古創</keb>

OK. Shunting those two senses off.

@@ -29,20 +28,0 @@
-<sense>
-<pos>&aux-adj;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="2257550">ない・1</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2257550">ない・1</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2257550">ない・1</xref>
-<misc>&col;</misc>
-<s_inf>verb-negating suffix; may indicate question or invitation with rising intonation</s_inf>
-<gloss>not</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<stagr>ねー</stagr>
-<stagr>ねえ</stagr>
-<stagr>ねぇ</stagr>
-<pos>&adj-pn;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="1529520">無い・1</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1529520">無い・2</xref>
-<gloss>nonexistent</gloss>
-<gloss>not being (there)</gloss>
-<gloss>not had</gloss>
-</sense>

I don't mind it being a separate entry, 
but then I think sense 3 should go with 
it, and that it should include ね as a 
reading (but it should come last, after ね
ー, ねえ,ねぇ)

I think "suf" would be wrong for sense 4 
(but maybe fine for sense 3). Exp would be 
safer I guess.

I think sense 4 should go off into its own entry. It seems to be here because it shares the lesser surface forms, but it's not related to the main meanings. It's most related semantically to sense 1 of 1529520 (無い/ない) but adding it there would be a mess.
As for POS I think I'd duck and call it "suf".

I made it adj-pn just because the 無い 
entry is adj-i, but that might not be 
ideal, I don't know.
I think it's worth including. The 
difference between できねー etc. and ねー is 
that できねー is sufficiently covered by 
sense 3 ("can not"). but it doesn't really 
comprehensibly cover the ねー in 興味ねー.

We're combining two very different meanings into one entry here. The ねえ in 興味ねー is completely unrelated to the ねえ in ですねー. If anything, the former belongs in the ない entry.
But do we even need sense 4? Any adjective or verb with an あい sound can be written/spoken like this (e.g. うるせえ, できねー, わかんねー, 知らねえ).
Also, why adj-pn?

An attempt

@@ -35,0 +36,11 @@
+<sense>
+<stagr>ねー</stagr>
+<stagr>ねえ</stagr>
+<stagr>ねぇ</stagr>
+<pos>&adj-pn;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1529520">無い・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1529520">無い・2</xref>
+<gloss>nonexistent</gloss>
+<gloss>not being (there)</gloss>
+<gloss>not had</gloss>
+</sense>

無い (negation of ある) is not the same as verb-negating suffix.

Covered by sense 3?

”ねー", "ねえ" (but maybe not ね) are also 無い as in 興味ねー

@@ -19,3 +19,3 @@
-<s_inf>at sentence end</s_inf>
-<gloss>indicates emphasis, agreement, request for confirmation, etc.</gloss>
-<gloss>is it so</gloss>
+<s_inf>at sentence end; indicates emphasis, agreement, request for confirmation, etc.</s_inf>
+<gloss>right?</gloss>
+<gloss>don't you think</gloss>

G n-grams:
 そうですねー	193777
 そうですねえ	 85869

reordering

@@ -9 +9 @@
-<reb>ねえ</reb>
+<reb>ねー</reb>
@@ -12 +12 @@
-<reb>ねー</reb>
+<reb>ねえ</reb>

several examples in Tatoeba

@@ -9,0 +10,6 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ねー</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ねぇ</reb>

@@ -20,0 +21 @@
+<gloss>listen</gloss>

I don't really agree with ” usu. ね” either, but most of 
all I just wanted to move up "(sentence end)" to the note

@@ -13,2 +13,2 @@
-<s_inf>usu. ね</s_inf>
-<gloss>(sentence end) indicates emphasis, agreement, request for confirmation, etc.</gloss>
+<s_inf>at sentence end</s_inf>
+<gloss>indicates emphasis, agreement, request for confirmation, etc.</gloss>

OK.

I don't think that note was very true, though there is of 
course a nuance definition between "ね！" and "ねー"

@@ -19 +18,0 @@
-<s_inf>usu. ねえ</s_inf>

See discussion on 2257550.
I can't point at specific references, but I'm sure I've heard it used this way.

@@ -23,0 +23,7 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&aux-adj;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2257550">ない・1</xref>
+<misc>&col;</misc>
+<s_inf>verb-negating suffix; may indicate question or invitation with rising intonation</s_inf>
+<gloss>not</gloss>
+</sense>

Entry created

Jim, in Tatoeba there are 621 ん that are tagged の

@@ -23 +23,2 @@
-<gloss>negative verb ending used in informal speech (abbr. of negative verb ending "nu")</gloss>
+<s_inf>negative verb ending used in informal speech; abbr. of negative verb ending ぬ</s_inf>
+<gloss>not</gloss>
@@ -29 +30,2 @@
-<gloss>abbr. of particle "no"</gloss>
+<s_inf>abbr. of particle の; indicates possessive</s_inf>
+<gloss>'s</gloss>
@@ -34 +36,5 @@
-<gloss>abbr. of particle "ni" (used especially when it precedes the verb "naru")</gloss>
+<s_inf>abbr. of particle に, used esp. when it precedes the verb なる</s_inf>
+<gloss>at (place, time)</gloss>
+<gloss>in</gloss>
+<gloss>on</gloss>
+<gloss>during</gloss>

@@ -30 +29,0 @@
-<xref type="see">の</xref>

daijs
１ 相手の意向を了解・承諾したときに用いる語。うん。「―、いいよ」
２ 疑問を表すときに用いる語。「―、何か変だぞ」
no mention of abbr

(I'm not touching the xref for の, that's happening 
automatically)

@@ -10 +9,0 @@
-<misc>&abbr;</misc>
@@ -13,0 +13,5 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&int;</pos>
+<gloss>huh?</gloss>
+<gloss>what?</gloss>
@@ -25,2 +29 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1469800">の・1</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1469800">の・4</xref>
+<xref type="see">の</xref>

PoS are wonky.  copying from xref targets
synching sense 1 with うん

@@ -11,1 +11,3 @@
-<gloss>used to express approval, especially in slurred or unclear speech (abbr. of interjection "un")</gloss>
+<gloss>yes</gloss>
+<gloss>yeah</gloss>
+<gloss>uh huh</gloss>
@@ -14,1 +16,2 @@
-<pos>&int;</pos>
+<pos>&aux-v;</pos>
+<pos>&suf;</pos>
@@ -19,1 +22,5 @@
-<pos>&int;</pos>
+<pos>&prt;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1469800">の・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1469800">の・4</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1469800">の・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1469800">の・4</xref>
@@ -23,1 +30,1 @@
-<pos>&int;</pos>
+<pos>&prt;</pos>

Probably just an xref.

@@ -9,0 +9,1 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1001090">うん</xref>

Should sense 1 just be combined with うん? We could give it a note if that's felt to be necessary.

@@ -14,1 +14,1 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2441300">ぬ</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2441300">ぬ・1</xref>
@@ -19,1 +19,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1469800">乃・の</xref>

Entry created

Not a question I can really answer, but I note that many references split ない into two entries in a similar way.
1529520 has been an entry from the beginning of this dictionary, and has been edited a lot. It was split into senses in early 2008 by Rene, shortly after he added this entry.

Is there a reason that these senses aren't part of the 1529520 ない entry?

Just meant to say my addition was actually already covered by a separate entry.

@@ -10 +10 @@
-<s_inf>verb and adjective-negating suffix; may indicate question or invitation with rising intonation</s_inf>
+<s_inf>verb-negating suffix; may indicate question or invitation with rising intonation</s_inf>

Quite possibly, but it's been there for years and I'm reluctant to chop it. Harmless.

Sorry, is the adjectival use maybe covered by the 無い entry's "not" sense?

@@ -10 +10 @@
-<s_inf>verb- and adjective-negating suffix; may indicate question or invitation with rising intonation</s_inf>
+<s_inf>verb and adjective-negating suffix; may indicate question or invitation with rising intonation</s_inf>

i.e. かわいく_ない_

@@ -10 +10 @@
-<s_inf>verb-negating suffix; may indicate question or invitation with rising intonation</s_inf>
+<s_inf>verb- and adjective-negating suffix; may indicate question or invitation with rising intonation</s_inf>

potentially this means a lot of changes to other entries that end in -nai

https://japanese.stackexchange.com/questions/28944/should-i-use-なすぎる-or-なさすぎる

Rene has pointed out in the long-running adj-i/adj-ix debate that sense 1 should be "aux-v". I agree.

@@ -9 +9 @@
-<pos>&aux-adj;</pos>
+<pos>&aux-v;</pos>

I'll close this and propose the change to the ねえ entry.

I suggest adding it as another sense of the ねえ/ね entry and having xrefs.

As far as I can tell, we don't have anything anywhere indicating the use of ねえ/ねー/ねぇ in place of ない, and it's probably worth having. My first thought was adding it here, but maybe a separate entry with [col] and an xref here would be better?

->notes

@@ -10,1 +10,2 @@
-<gloss>not (verb-negating suffix; may indicate question or invitation with rising intonation)</gloss>
+<s_inf>verb-negating suffix; may indicate question or invitation with rising intonation</s_inf>
+<gloss>not</gloss>
@@ -16,1 +17,2 @@
-<gloss>emphatic suffix (used after the root of an adjective)</gloss>
+<s_inf>after the root of an adjective</s_inf>
+<gloss>emphatic suffix</gloss>

Entry created

@@ -13,2 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>trust me, I'm talking from experience</gloss>
-<gloss>word to the wise</gloss>
+<gloss>trust me, speaking from experience</gloss>
+<gloss>words from the wise</gloss>

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>word to the wise</gloss>

twitter

This is how I read it.

@@ -12,2 +12,2 @@
-<pos>&v5r;</pos>
-<gloss>only someone who's been through it can talk about it</gloss>
+<gloss>take it from me</gloss>
+<gloss>trust me, I'm talking from experience</gloss>

GG5 (sub-entry & example). N-grams: 22341

Not uncommon saying.

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>those who have had first-hand experience can say fact</gloss>
+<pos>&v5r;</pos>
+<gloss>only someone who's been through it can talk about it</gloss>

https://dic.pixiv.net/a/経験者は語る

"continually whispering many uninteresting 
things"?is this really a good gloss for an 
adverb? I find this entry very confusing

喃喃	613
喃々	778
なんなん	908652

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>喃喃</keb>
+<keb>喃々</keb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<keb>喃々</keb>
+<keb>喃喃</keb>
@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2840437">喋々・ちょうちょう</xref>

GG5; daijr

Not sure about the PoS.

与えたもう	1877
与え給う	3361
与え賜う	672
あたえたもう	99
与えたまう	263
あたえたまう	118

As in 彼らに平安を与え給え.

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>与え給う</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -8 +11 @@
-<keb>与え給う</keb>
+<keb>与え賜う</keb>
@@ -11 +14 @@
-<keb>与え賜う</keb>
+<keb>与えたまう</keb>
@@ -14,0 +18,9 @@
+<re_restr>与え給う</re_restr>
+<re_restr>与えたもう</re_restr>
+<re_restr>与え賜う</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>あたえたまう</reb>
+<re_restr>与え給う</re_restr>
+<re_restr>与え賜う</re_restr>
+<re_restr>与えたまう</re_restr>

https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=与えたもう
https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=与え給

与えたもう --> 与えたもうた

weblio https://ejje.weblio.jp/content/私のほうこそ

google images
g n-grams:
チーズドッグ	2136

They seem to be somewhat different from what would be considered a typical "cheese dog" in America though.

Self-approving to avoid unintentional forking of the original in jmnedict

I'm moving this back to jmdict and making a separate entry for _ザ_・イエロー・モンキー.

@@ -1,3 +1,2 @@
-<ent_seq>5742063</ent_seq>
-<ent_corp>jmnedict</ent_corp>
+<ent_corp>jmdict</ent_corp>
@@ -11,2 +10,4 @@
-<misc>&organization;</misc>
-<gloss>Yellow Monkey (band)</gloss>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&derog;</misc>
+<gloss>yellow monkey</gloss>
+<gloss>gook</gloss>

https://www.news-postseven.com/archives/20150126_296290.html
"日本人を“イエローモンキー”と呼んで憚らない差別主義者だったチャーチル首相は"
This is interesting because I can't find any mentions of Churchill ever referring to the Japanese (or anybody else) as "yellow monkeys" 
in English. "Yellow monkey" here is probably not a translation of whatever actual words Churchill might have used to describe the 
Japanese but an interpretation or a shorthand of his views, represented with a word Japanese people can understand. 

https://www.sankei.com/premium/news/190222/prm1902220010-n1.html
"_みなさん「イエローモンキー」という言葉をご存じだと思います_。黄色人種に対する蔑称（べっしょう）、人種差別の言葉。" (my emphasis. "a word everyone 
knows")

twitter:
29m ago:
"それって日本人はサル並みってことじゃん草
ｲｴﾛーﾓﾝｷｰってことね・・・。"
2h ago:
"ウッドロウ・ウィルソン大統領(パリ講和会議で有名になった、米国大統領(民主党))も相当な 日本差別主義者ですよ。
イエローモンキーと言って周囲に罵り拡散させたク⚪野郎ですから。"
4h ago:
"麻猿「おいらはイエローモンキーさ！それ以上でもそれ以下でもなぁい！」"
7h ago:
"この電話番号はただいま貴様のようなイエローモンキーに対しては一切使用されておりません"
9h ago:
"#安倍晋三 が海外に税金をばらまき、国民をどんどん貧困にして、経済的徴兵制を実施中w
#ジャパンハンドラー が #安倍晋三 を使って、米国の戦争に荷担させ、#軍産複合体 を儲けさせ、イエローモンキーの #アホン人 大量殺戮を画策中www"
10h ago:
"ルカ「最近知ったんだけど、牛って赤色に過剰反応するわけじゃないんだね」
悦匡「牛はただ単に目の前でヒラヒラする物にイラついているだけですよ。ルカさんだって目の前でゴミ虫が高速で反復横飛び開始したら殴りたくなるでしょう？そう
いう事です」
ユリ「斬新な例えだなイエローモンキー」"
11h ago:
"こういう非人道的な政府の姿勢が日本の評価をどんどん下げていることに気付かないんだろうか？かつてエコノミックアニマルとかイエロー・モンキーとか蔑まれたの
は無理解と妬みも背景にあったが、現代では理解したうえで嘲笑われ、軽蔑されているんだよ、日本人。"
11h ago:
"未だイエローモンキー扱い…"
11h ago:
"白くないよおおおおおおおおおおおおお(´；ω；｀)
イエローモンキーだよ(´･_･`)"
12h ago:
"色白は本当うらやま!!!!
私も黒いほうではないけど、
イエローモンキーすぎて！"

9 hits past 12 hrs.
エコノミックアニマル only gets 5 hits
グック gets no hits (with the meaning "gook") the past 24 hrs
(ジャップ obviously gets squadrillions)

Look... the expression's been used in Japanese since at least the 60's. I've actually heard it used in conversation more than once. The 
native informant I previously mentioned has too. It's in Wikipedia, Hatena, Pixiv Hyakkajiten. It gets 9 hits the past 12 hours on 
twitter (i.e. the ones above, so that's excluding everything that was or could have been about the band). If this hasn't "entered the 
Japanese language" then we should probably slash a large portion of the gairaigo already in jmdict because I seriously doubt even a 
quarter of them would clear this bar of actual usage. The argument that it's not helpful for translation purposes could also be applied 
to a majority of our gairaigo entries (but they, and this entry, are still useful in other ways). I also disagree entirely with the 
notion that the bar should be set higher for derogative terms than non-derogative ones and that it'd ever be harmful to include a slur 
that is in use (or has actually been in use - and even if it in someway would be, I don't think it's relevant to what we're doing here 
and not something we should have to consider)

I note that those examples are all quotes or explanations.
Even if it's widely known by Japanese people, I don't really see it as a Japanese expression. I think there needs to be evidence of widespread usage (beyond quotes, etc.) before something like this can be considered to have entered the Japanese language.
My comment about it not being harmless had to do with the offensive nature of the term. If we're going to include a racial slur that isn't in any dictionary, we need to have some pretty good justification for doing so.
Ultimately, I just don't think this is needed. It's a transliteration of English, it's not especially common, and I can't see it being helpful for translation purposes.

Plenty of hits on google books including a 
1984 example: "白人はわしらのことをイエロー・モ
ンキーいうてます"

a 1967 example:
"ふたりの白人少年が、にやにやわらっていた。どちら
も、ジムぐらいの十三、四さい。少年たちは、両手をこ
しにあてると、あごをつきだした。「ヘイ、イエロー・ 
モンキー..."

the usage of the word by Japanese is also 
briefly discussed in the 1998 book 
"Japanese Culture and Communication: 
Critical Cultural Analysis" (on Google 
Books) 

and again, though it's not in gg5 or 
daijr, it's in both Wiki and Hatena (and 
also in the pixiv百科事典)

I feel it's a word that's widely known 
among Japanese, including older 
generations, unlike say alot of the slang 
expressions we have. It's a little similar 
to エコノミックアニマル also in that it's an 
English expression only rarely used in 
English but one that Japanese people 
imagine is being frequently used to 
ridicule them, so it has taken on a life 
on its own in Japan.
I do think it's perfectly "harmless" to 
include because it's without a doubt 
correct to say it's used in Japanese with 
the meaning suggested.
(Robin, thanks for the suggestion, but I 
can't resize the box on mobile)

Marcus's comment from a fork:
"Worth noting also that I talked to a (bilingual) native speaker about this and she said she can't recall ever actually hearing the word in English but has heard Japanese people use it"
--------------
It probably is used more in Japanese than in English (I haven't heard it either) but I still feel it's pretty obscure and not worth adding.
With other submissions, we could say "it's harmless, let's add it" but that's not the case here. I think we need better examples of usage.
Considering that we have entries for イエロー and モンキー, I think it's safe to ignore anyway. In context, the meaning should be clear.
----
By the way Marcus, to stop your comments from being split onto different lines like that, try resizing the text box before submitting (it doesn't matter how much - even a couple of pixels should do it). That worked for me when I had the same problem.

I'm not sure the usage is up the level that would justify an entry, especially for a term that has the potential to be highly offensive.
It's a bit different with ジャップ as it's in Daijirin, GG5, etc.

https://anond.hatelabo.jp/touch/2019061011
3240?mode=amp
日本人はイエローモンキーの中でも群を抜いて醜いぞ　

映画のアジア人は中国人が９割

https://www.reddit.com/r/newsokur/comments
/34pjxp/%E6%B5%B7%E5%A4%96%E5%9C%A8%E4%BD%
8F%E3%81%AE%E6%97%A5%E6%9C%AC%E4%BA%BA%E6%
97%A5%E6%9C%AC%E3%81%AB%E6%88%BB%E3%81%A3%
E3%81%A6%E3%81%8F%E3%82%8B%E3%81%A8%E3%82%
A4%E3%83%A9%E3%82%A4%E3%83%A9%E3%81%99%E3%
82%8B%E6%97%A5%E6%9C%AC%E4%BA%BA%E3%81%AF%
E5%B9%BC%E7%A8%9A%E3%81%A7%E7%BE%A4%E3%82%
8C%E3%81%9F%E3%81%8C%E3%82%8A%E8%87%AA%E5%
88%86%E3%81%AE%E6%84%8F%E8%A6%8B%E3%82%92%
E6%8C%81%E3%81%9F%E3%81%AA%E3%81%84%E8%A6%
AA%E9%9B%A2%E3%82%8C%E3%82%82%E5%AD%90/
"白人コンプ丸出しのイエローモンキーは黄色にも白に
も黒にもなれない"
https://www.reddit.com/r/newsokur/comments
/32jm3t/%E4%BC%81%E6%A5%AD%E3%82%84%E5%AD%
A6%E6%A0%A1%E3%81%A7%E8%8C%B6%E9%AB%AA%E8%
89%B2%E8%A6%8B%E6%9C%AC%E5%B0%8E%E5%85%A5%
E7%B6%9A%E3%80%85_%E8%8C%B6%E9%AB%AA%E3%81
%AF%E7%A4%BE%E4%BC%9A%E4%BA%BA%E3%81%A8%E3
%81%97%E3%81%A6%E3%82%A2%E3%82%A6%E3%83%88
%E3%81%A7%E3%82%82%E7%9C%9F%E3%81%A3%E9%BB
%92%E3%82%82%E3%81%B9%E3%81%9F%E3%83%BC%E3
%81%A3%E3%81%A8%E3%81%97%E3%81%A6%E9%80%86
%E3%81%AB%E4%B8%8D%E8%87%AA%E7%84%B6/
"ずっと思ってたけど黄色人に茶髪は猿みたいで似合わ
ない
[–]behkn 6 points 4 years ago 
黒でも猿だしどっちでもいいんじゃ
[–]nanashitest 3 points 4 years ago 
黒髪は肌色とのコントラストが引き立つからメリハリが
つくんだよ
茶髪はのぺーっとした印象になるし顔の造形も相まって
正にイエローモンキー"

https://enpedia.rxy.jp/wiki/海�%A
4%96%E5%8E%A8
「白人イケメンと比べると日本人はまるでイエローモン
キー」

I think the word has real usage. I've 
heard it in conversation more than once. 
"どうせ僕たちのことをイエローモンキーだと思ってる
でしょ" etc. It's similar to ジャップ土人 
which seems relatively common on some 
left-leaning parts of the Japanese 
Internet. It's also the exact same thing 
as ジャップ, which is also an entry.

A fair point. All the WWW hits I can see are for the band. I think we need to be wary of gairaigo expressions which are really transliterations of English, etc. with no real usage in Japanese.
I'll move this entry to enamdict as the band name.

@@ -1,3 +1,2 @@
-<ent_seq>2840984</ent_seq>
-<ent_corp>jmdict</ent_corp>
+<ent_corp>jmnedict</ent_corp>
@@ -11,4 +10,2 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<misc>&derog;</misc>
-<gloss>yellow monkey</gloss>
-<gloss>gook</gloss>
+<misc>&organization;</misc>
+<gloss>Yellow Monkey (band)</gloss>

Can this really be considered Japanese? It's not in any of the dictionaries. In what context would it be used other than to explain the English term?

Hmm

hatena: 蔑称として 黄色人種、日本人に対する、主に白人による蔑称。
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/イエローモンキー
(the band got the name from this meaning of the word: "バンド名の「イエローモンキー」とは、主に西洋圏で使用される東洋人に対する蔑称
である。")
https://studymanager.jp/post-703/

I don't think you can use a macron at syllable break?

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Shimōsa-Nakayama Station</gloss>
+<gloss>Shimousa-Nakayama Station</gloss>

wiki

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Shimousanakayama Station</gloss>
+<gloss>Shimōsa-Nakayama Station</gloss>

Hmm

hatena: 蔑称として 黄色人種、日本人に対する、主に白人による蔑称。
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/イエローモンキー
(the band got the name from this meaning of the word: "バンド名の「イエローモンキー」とは、主に西洋圏で使用される東洋人に対する蔑称
である。")
https://studymanager.jp/post-703/