I think I too prefer one sense, as in the 州 entry.
I like "prefecture (of Japan)", etc. though. I think it's clearer.

@@ -20,5 +19,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
-<gloss>department (e.g. France)</gloss>
@@ -25,0 +21 @@
+<gloss>department (France)</gloss>

two senses seems about right to me

@@ -19 +19,8 @@
-<gloss>prefecture (Japan), department (e.g. France). county (China, Taiwan, Norway, etc.), province (Italy, Spain, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>prefecture (Japan)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
+<gloss>department (e.g. France)</gloss>
+<gloss>county (China, Taiwan, Norway, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>province (Italy, Spain, etc.)</gloss>

リーダーズ+プラス: サリー《イングランド南東部の内陸州 ...》
中辞典: 【地名】 Surrey 《英国イングランド南東部の州》.

I was coming around to that position too. They are not really separate senses; just a case of different countries using different terms.
BTW, it seems the UK's counties are 州; not 県.
I'll approve this and reopen for (doubtless) ongoing discussion.

@@ -19,21 +19 @@
-<gloss>prefecture (Japan)</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
-<gloss>county (China, Taiwan, Norway, etc.)</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
-<gloss>province (Italy, Spain, etc.)</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
-<gloss>department (e.g. France)</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
-<gloss>district (e.g. Portugal)</gloss>
+<gloss>prefecture (Japan), department (e.g. France). county (China, Taiwan, Norway, etc.), province (Italy, Spain, etc.)</gloss>

I think this is excessive. I'd just go with one sense.

Does this make sense? I think it'd be weird to not have "prefecture of Japan" as its own sense, but it turns out I think having everything 
else together in a single sense is a little unsightly...

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
@@ -22 +23 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1331840">州・しゅう・1</xref>
+<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
@@ -23,0 +25,4 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
@@ -24,0 +30,4 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
@@ -25,0 +35,4 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&n-suf;</pos>

OK

I agree it should be "state" (for Germany) and "canton" (for Switzerland) etc. in the 州 entry. I don't think "major national administrative 
units" is a good gloss because it's an explanatory gloss when real translations can be used.

Isn't it inconsistent to have Land, Kanton and oblast in the 州 entry, but "county" here for the Norwegian fylke, and "province" for the Italian provincia? I think we should stick to English translations (e.g. canton), and not attempt to list too many.
How about "major national administrative units, e.g. county, province, department, etc."

jwiki(県)

this wiki article has along list of 県 around the world

@@ -23 +23,4 @@
-<gloss>administrative unit of a country (county, department, province, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>county (China, Taiwan, Norway, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>province (Italy, Spain, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>department (e.g. France)</gloss>
+<gloss>district (e.g. Portugal)</gloss>

Maybe this works. There's a messy overlap with 州/しゅう. For example Canada's provinces are 州, not 県.

@@ -22,5 +22,2 @@
-<gloss>county (China and Taiwan)</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>department (France)</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1331840">州・しゅう・1</xref>
+<gloss>administrative unit of a country (county, department, province, etc.)</gloss>

Wikipedia lists Norwegian, Danish and Swedish counties (fylke/amt/län) as 県, and also Italian provinces (provincia). 
daij have separate senses for Japanese and Chinese 県.

Should this maybe be 2 senses, one "Japanese prefecture", the other "county; province; department"?

Not needed.

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<gloss>prefecture (of Japan)</gloss>
+<gloss>prefecture (Japan)</gloss>
@@ -22 +22 @@
-<gloss>county (of China and Taiwan)</gloss>
+<gloss>county (China and Taiwan)</gloss>
@@ -26 +26 @@
-<gloss>department (of France)</gloss>
+<gloss>department (France)</gloss>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/フランスの地方行政区画
see also 海外県 in daijs

@@ -23,0 +24,4 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>department (of France)</gloss>
+</sense>

@@ -22 +22 @@
-<gloss>county (of China)</gloss>
+<gloss>county (of China and Taiwan)</gloss>

@@ -22,4 +22,3 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1258810">県・けん・2</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1258810">県・けん・2</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1258810">県・けん・2</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1258810">県・けん・2</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1258810">県・けん・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1258810">県・けん・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1258810">県・けん・1</xref>

@@ -28 +28 @@
-<gloss>state (US, Australia, India, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>state (US, Australia, India, Germany, etc.)</gloss>
@@ -30,2 +30 @@
-<gloss>Land (e.g. Germany)</gloss>
-<gloss>Kanton (e.g. Switzerland)</gloss>
+<gloss>canton (e.g. Switzerland)</gloss>

gg5 koj daij

@@ -22,5 +22,11 @@
-<gloss>state</gloss>
-<gloss>province</gloss>
-<gloss>county</gloss>
-<gloss>oblast</gloss>
-<gloss>department (of ancient China)</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1258810">県・けん・2</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1258810">県・けん・2</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1258810">県・けん・2</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1258810">県・けん・2</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1258810">県・けん・2</xref>
+<gloss>state (US, Australia, India, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>province (e.g. Canada)</gloss>
+<gloss>Land (e.g. Germany)</gloss>
+<gloss>Kanton (e.g. Switzerland)</gloss>
+<gloss>oblast (e.g. Russia)</gloss>
+<gloss>department (e.g. ancient China)</gloss>

@@ -36 +36,2 @@
-<gloss>(after someone's name) dear</gloss>
+<s_inf>after someone's name</s_inf>
+<gloss>dear</gloss>

eij
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/オーブラスチ

@@ -24,0 +25 @@
+<gloss>oblast</gloss>

http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/アメリカ合衆国の州

Definitely used as a suffix for US state names. I wasn't sure about for a continent, 
but googling "アジア州" and "ヨローパ州" has a number of hits.

@@ -20,0 +21 @@
+<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
@@ -27,0 +29 @@
+<pos>&n-suf;</pos>

@@ -23,1 +23,1 @@
-<gloss>county (UK)</gloss>
+<gloss>county</gloss>

daijs

not arch

@@ -18 +17,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -26 +24,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -32,0 +31,5 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<s_inf>Imperial Army jargon</s_inf>
+<gloss>civilian society</gloss>
+</sense>

splitting.  these readings don't actually have anything in common except 'countryside' which is [arch]ish for じかた.

@@ -16,3 +16,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>じかた</reb>
-</r_ele>
@@ -22,0 +19,2 @@
+<gloss>district</gloss>
+<gloss>region</gloss>
@@ -24,3 +23,0 @@
-<gloss>district</gloss>
-<gloss>region</gloss>
-<gloss>province</gloss>
@@ -31,0 +27,2 @@
+<xref type="ant" seq="1423430">中央・ちゅうおう・2</xref>
+<gloss>the country</gloss>
@@ -32,0 +30,1 @@
+<gloss>the provinces</gloss>
@@ -34,12 +33,0 @@
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<gloss>coast (esp. as seen from the water)</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<stagr>じかた</stagr>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<gloss>person singing ballads in noh</gloss>
-<gloss>person in charge of music in a Japanese dance performance</gloss>
-</sense>

@@ -43,1 +43,1 @@
-<gloss>person singing ballads in Noh</gloss>
+<gloss>person singing ballads in noh</gloss>

Kanji Haitani list

Adding yoji tagAdding yoji tag
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<misc>&yoji;</misc>

Nicholas is right in that Daijisen and Daijirin don't include this in their って entries, but instead have separate たって 
entries. We do have a たって entry for this usage likewise. Still, I think it'd be fine to keep that sense here while keeping the 
たって entry as well - I think it'd be helpful not least because I don't think somebody trying to figure out what this use of っ
て means would be very likely to find their way to the たって entry.

Marcus, this edit removes a sense you added in 2012. I notice that both your examples do have たって, and it seems to be coing from 経って. MeCab says たっ + て. Do you have a view on the proposal? I'm rather neutral - it's up the front for historical reasons.

Examples from the same sense in Daijirin 4.0:
"どうするかって、ぼくにも名案はないよ"
"早く行けって、それは無理だよ"

Regarding the "if ... then" sense. The examples given in the refs when this sense was added contain たって, not って. They're unrelated to the topical/quotational って. There's already an entry for たって.
The DJR definition given is describing the case where you raise the other person's speech as the topic and make a statement regarding it. I don't know if this needs to be explicitly defined separately from the topical/quotational usage of って.
The best I could come up with is "..., you say? (used to call something someone said into question and make a statement regarding it)".

@@ -20,5 +19,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&prt;</pos>
-<s_inf>indicates supposition</s_inf>
-<gloss>if ... then</gloss>

https://grammarist.com/usage/said/

Actually "the said ..." was intended. Both can be found.

@@ -40,0 +41 @@
+<gloss>the said ...</gloss>

Fixed a small grammatical issue.

@@ -41 +41 @@
-<gloss>the said ...</gloss>
+<gloss>said ...</gloss>

Moved usage notes into [note]s. Was then forced to add 
glosses to sense 1, 3 and 4.
Added "satirical" to sense 3 for clarification (「こんな
まずいもの食えるかって」)
_
This entry is also a great example why I think we should 
allow for senses with only notes for glosses. (sorry for 
beating a dead horse)

@@ -16 +16,5 @@
-<gloss>casual quoting particle</gloss>
+<s_inf>casual quoting particle</s_inf>
+<gloss>you said</gloss>
+<gloss>he said</gloss>
+<gloss>she said</gloss>
+<gloss>they said</gloss>
@@ -20 +24 @@
-<gloss>indicates supposition</gloss>
+<s_inf>indicates supposition</s_inf>
@@ -25,2 +29,2 @@
-<s_inf>as かって</s_inf>
-<gloss>indicates a rhetorical question</gloss>
+<s_inf>as かって; indicates a satirical or rhetorical question</s_inf>
+<gloss>do you seriously think that</gloss>
@@ -30 +34,4 @@
-<gloss>indicates certainty, insistence, emphasis, etc.</gloss>
+<s_inf>indicates certainty, insistence, emphasis, etc.</s_inf>
+<gloss>I already told you</gloss>
+<gloss>you should know by now that</gloss>
+<gloss>of course</gloss>

Reopening, with a few small edits.

@@ -29 +29 @@
-<gloss>indicates certainty, insistence, emphasis etc.</gloss>
+<gloss>indicates certainty, insistence, emphasis, etc.</gloss>
@@ -34 +34 @@
-<gloss>someone named...</gloss>
+<gloss>the said ...</gloss>
@@ -39 +39 @@
-<gloss>says that...</gloss>
+<gloss>says that ...</gloss>
@@ -44 +44 @@
-<gloss>I hear that...</gloss>
+<gloss>I hear that ...</gloss>
@@ -49,2 +49 @@
-<gloss>points to a term being defined</gloss>
-<gloss>means</gloss>
+<gloss>as for the term ...</gloss>
@@ -54,2 +53,2 @@
-<s_inf>equiv. of は</s_inf>
-<gloss>as for (topic marker)</gloss>
+<s_inf>equiv. of は topic marker</s_inf>
+<gloss>as for ...</gloss>

Daijr, GG5

I don't mind the additional senses (GG5 has 8) but I don't think they should go in front of the ones that were there already.
Editing for style and consistency. I'll approve this, then reopen for a while.

@@ -15 +14,0 @@
-<s_inf>abbr. for と and other similar combinations</s_inf>
@@ -17,27 +15,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&prt;</pos>
-<s_inf>abbr. for という</s_inf>
-<gloss>someone named...</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&prt;</pos>
-<s_inf>abbr. for と言っている</s_inf>
-<gloss>says that...</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&prt;</pos>
-<s_inf>abbr. for と聞いている</s_inf>
-<gloss>I hear that...</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&prt;</pos>
-<s_inf>abbr. for とは、というのは</s_inf>
-<gloss>points to a term being defined</gloss>
-<gloss>means</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&prt;</pos>
-<s_inf>same as は particle</s_inf>
-<gloss>as for X</gloss>
-<gloss>topic marker</gloss>
@@ -58,0 +31,26 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&prt;</pos>
+<s_inf>abbr. of という</s_inf>
+<gloss>someone named...</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&prt;</pos>
+<s_inf>abbr. of と言っている</s_inf>
+<gloss>says that...</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&prt;</pos>
+<s_inf>abbr. of と聞いている</s_inf>
+<gloss>I hear that...</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&prt;</pos>
+<s_inf>abbr. of とは, というのは</s_inf>
+<gloss>points to a term being defined</gloss>
+<gloss>means</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&prt;</pos>
+<s_inf>equiv. of は</s_inf>
+<gloss>as for (topic marker)</gloss>
+</sense>

gg5 koj daij

It's a start.

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<s_inf>abbr. for と, というのは and other similar combinations</s_inf>
+<s_inf>abbr. for と and other similar combinations</s_inf>
@@ -16,0 +17,27 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&prt;</pos>
+<s_inf>abbr. for という</s_inf>
+<gloss>someone named...</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&prt;</pos>
+<s_inf>abbr. for と言っている</s_inf>
+<gloss>says that...</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&prt;</pos>
+<s_inf>abbr. for と聞いている</s_inf>
+<gloss>I hear that...</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&prt;</pos>
+<s_inf>abbr. for とは、というのは</s_inf>
+<gloss>points to a term being defined</gloss>
+<gloss>means</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&prt;</pos>
+<s_inf>same as は particle</s_inf>
+<gloss>as for X</gloss>
+<gloss>topic marker</gloss>
@@ -30 +57 @@
-<gloss>indicates certainty, insistence, etc.</gloss>
+<gloss>indicates certainty, insistence, emphasis etc.</gloss>

I based it on daijs "３ （「かって」の形で）反語の意を表す。「こんなまずい
もの食えるか―」「だれが言うことを聞くか―」"
but irony was probably a poor translation for "反語", maybe 
this is better?

@@ -26,1 +26,1 @@
-<gloss>indicates irony</gloss>
+<gloss>indicates a rhetorical question</gloss>

I'd struggle to come up with one. I see Daijisen has "こんなまずいもの食えるか", which is more commonly seen as "こんなまずいもん食えるか" - from the examples around of that passage it's anything but ironical.

Please add an example of って illustrating [3][prt]  [as かって]  indicates 
irony. I could not find one anywhere. Thank you very much.

daijs:
"３ （「かって」の形で）反語の意を表す。「こんなまずいもの食えるか―」「だれが言
うことを聞くか―」

４ 自分の気持ちを主張する意を表す。「そんなこと知ってる―」「わかってるよ、もう言う
な―」→たって〔接助〕"

@@ -23,0 +23,9 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&prt;</pos>
+<s_inf>as かって</s_inf>
+<gloss>indicates irony</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&prt;</pos>
+<gloss>indicates certainty, insistence, etc.</gloss>
+</sense>

Hi, I understand that って can also be a sentence-final particle with a similar meaning to よ.

eij:
"「どうして先生に抗議しないの？」「そんなことしたって内申書にキズがつくだけだよ」
Why don't you protest against the teacher?" "It will only 
leave a black mark on my record."
"おい、怒鳴るのはやめろよ！そんなことしたって、この子は泣き止まないぞ。
Hey, don't yell at him. That won't make him stop crying."

Well spotted. I've preliminarily copied the gloss from the -
ば entry, though the usage seems a lot more restricted. 
Daijs doesn't gloss it as a conditional but like some kind 
of a topic marker: ”２ 相手の質問・命令・依頼などを受けて、それを話題とし
て示す意を表す。…と言われても。「今さら変更する―、急に困るね」「どうするか―、
決まってるだろ」”
Daij also have quite a few more senses (7 in daijr, 8 in 
daijs).

@@ -18,0 +18,5 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&prt;</pos>
+<gloss>indicates supposition</gloss>
+<gloss>if ... then</gloss>
+</sense>

Hi, my understanding is that in certain contexts ～って can signify a conditional.

Makino & Tsutsui DBJG P 510.

Since Makino & Tsutsui say it's simply a colloquial version of と, it's probably best to reference that.

@@ -14,1 +14,2 @@
-<s_inf>abbr for というのは and other similar combinations</s_inf>
+<xref type="see" seq="1008490">と・4</xref>
+<s_inf>abbr. for と, というのは and other similar combinations</s_inf>

No change to the above.
It may help to have a cross-link with the following in order to obviate the need for a fresh search to find what the main entry is short for, i.e., [note="abbr for というのは]:-

ってのは (exp) (See って) means; is; as for

Also, with regard to the note "and other similar combinations", I am wondering whether that loose comment can be firmed up with proper links.

No comment, so I'll close this off, and add it to というのは.

I'm quite comfortable adding ってのは to the dictionary, but I suspect it should be added to the と言うのは entry rather than here.
I've been looking through the usage of ってのは and というのは in the examples in GG5 (there are quite a few of each), and I'm starting to suspect there is a different nuance with ってのは.

I did not want to amend the above, but often in text [as demonstrated by the mass of results on Google] "ってのは" is used in much the same way as the above and, in context, equals "というのは". Your [A] references also show quite a few examples. Could "ってのは" be included in this entry to assist the searcher? One piece of text which I was reading was "一人っきりってのは". Helpfully, you have the first part [一人っきり], but not the last part.

If I am in the wrong road on this one, then a correct entry would be very helpful.

Entry created

Jim, in Tatoeba there are 621 ん that are tagged の

@@ -23 +23,2 @@
-<gloss>negative verb ending used in informal speech (abbr. of negative verb ending "nu")</gloss>
+<s_inf>negative verb ending used in informal speech; abbr. of negative verb ending ぬ</s_inf>
+<gloss>not</gloss>
@@ -29 +30,2 @@
-<gloss>abbr. of particle "no"</gloss>
+<s_inf>abbr. of particle の; indicates possessive</s_inf>
+<gloss>'s</gloss>
@@ -34 +36,5 @@
-<gloss>abbr. of particle "ni" (used especially when it precedes the verb "naru")</gloss>
+<s_inf>abbr. of particle に, used esp. when it precedes the verb なる</s_inf>
+<gloss>at (place, time)</gloss>
+<gloss>in</gloss>
+<gloss>on</gloss>
+<gloss>during</gloss>

@@ -30 +29,0 @@
-<xref type="see">の</xref>

daijs
１ 相手の意向を了解・承諾したときに用いる語。うん。「―、いいよ」
２ 疑問を表すときに用いる語。「―、何か変だぞ」
no mention of abbr

(I'm not touching the xref for の, that's happening 
automatically)

@@ -10 +9,0 @@
-<misc>&abbr;</misc>
@@ -13,0 +13,5 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&int;</pos>
+<gloss>huh?</gloss>
+<gloss>what?</gloss>
@@ -25,2 +29 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1469800">の・1</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1469800">の・4</xref>
+<xref type="see">の</xref>

PoS are wonky.  copying from xref targets
synching sense 1 with うん

@@ -11,1 +11,3 @@
-<gloss>used to express approval, especially in slurred or unclear speech (abbr. of interjection "un")</gloss>
+<gloss>yes</gloss>
+<gloss>yeah</gloss>
+<gloss>uh huh</gloss>
@@ -14,1 +16,2 @@
-<pos>&int;</pos>
+<pos>&aux-v;</pos>
+<pos>&suf;</pos>
@@ -19,1 +22,5 @@
-<pos>&int;</pos>
+<pos>&prt;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1469800">の・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1469800">の・4</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1469800">の・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1469800">の・4</xref>
@@ -23,1 +30,1 @@
-<pos>&int;</pos>
+<pos>&prt;</pos>

Probably just an xref.

@@ -9,0 +9,1 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1001090">うん</xref>

Should sense 1 just be combined with うん? We could give it a note if that's felt to be necessary.

@@ -14,1 +14,1 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2441300">ぬ</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2441300">ぬ・1</xref>
@@ -19,1 +19,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1469800">乃・の</xref>

Entry created

if both kanji versions are still desired as headwords, is there any reason this can't be merged with 之?

Reopening.

@@ -12,0 +12,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1469800">乃・の・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1469800">の・1</xref>

I need to approve this wo xrefs. I'll reopen it later.

@@ -12,1 +12,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1469800">乃・の・1</xref>

OK, I'm making this the 乃 version, and I'll take the kanji off 1469800.
All OK with wwwjdic and the examples.

@@ -4,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>乃</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -9,2 +12,3 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1469800">乃</xref>
-<gloss>indicates possessive among other uses (for full details and examples see the main entry (linked))</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1469800">乃・の・1</xref>
+<misc>&arch;</misc>
+<gloss>possessive particle</gloss>

Paul's preference for having 乃/の as the main "の" entry was to do with linking from the Tatoeba/Tanaka sentences. Without a kanji headword, WWWJDIC can bring up any entry with a reading of の. He also suggested the solo entry for の, as several users couldn't find 乃/の and tried to create new "の" entries.
I'd be quite happy to have just "の (also written 乃", but give me time to look into the WWJDIC implications. I may be able to do a workaround.

i've never understood the situation with の/乃/之.  i know Paul wanted this entry for の to make text glossing easier, but none of my dictionaries bothers with entries for 乃 or 之.

i'd be happy to have only an entry for の, with "also written as 乃, 之" in a note.  (see for example our entry for パン).  having three different entries for の seems unnecessary.

Any point in this entry ?

@@ -10,1 +10,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1469800">乃</xref>

Entry created

gg5 daijs
g ng

複数回答	95175