Barbara F. Kawakami, Japanese Immigrant Clothing in Hawaii 1885-1941 
(Honolulu, University of Hawaii Press, 1993), pp.182-183:

"When the kimono shroud was completed, the body of the deceased was 
carefully dressed with the right front overlapping the left front, which is 
known as the hidarimae manner. (Normally, a kimono is worn with the left 
front panel overlapping the right front panel.) In ancient times the Japanese 
had worn their kimono the hidarimae way. But this custom began to change in 
the seventh century, when Chinese court costumes were introduced. Because 
the Chinese wore their costumes overlapped in the opposite direction, there 
was a period of confusion: some Japanese held to the old way; some  adopted 
the Chinese way. Finally, in the eighth century, Emperor Gensho (715-723) 
instituted a dress code that required the Japanese to wear their kimono with 
the left front over the right. After that, wearing a kimono hidarimae was 
avoided in Japan; it was considered an omen of misfortune or even death. The 
issei immigrants to Hawaii of course brought these beliefs with them. Issei 
mothers would reprimand their children for inadvertently wearing their 
bedtime kimono overlapped the wrong way, and mothers would become 
especially upset if their daughters wore their kimono in the hidarimae manner 
on New Year’s Day, since that might mean that the whole year would be 
unlucky. A plantation mother might say, “You wearing make man style?” 
(Make means dead in Hawaiian.) To this day, when issei women see people of 
other ethnic groups at Obon dances or teahouse parties wearing kimono the 
hidarimae way, they have the same reaction: they feel it is a bad omen. The 
younger-generation Japanese probably do not even notice."

http://books.google.com/books?
id=3sAFvVIfwcIC&pg=PA183&lpg=PA183&dq=hidarimae&source=bl&ots=U0
94ODY-
CY&sig=_89H4M6zRxSx_UuxTYf4SW26PUk&hl=en&sa=X&ei=OuFNUfCbNcvry
AHzs4HoAg&ved=0CF4Q6AEwCg#v=snippet&q=hidarimae&f=false

Definition #2 is incorrect. It reads "right side tucked under the left" but it should 
read "left side tucked under the right."

@@ -21,1 +21,1 @@
-<gloss>wearing a kimono with the right side tucked under the left (from someone else's POV; normally used only for the dead)</gloss>
+<gloss>wearing a kimono with the left side tucked under the right (from someone else's POV; normally used only for the dead)</gloss>

daijr/s, prog, Luminous, 新和英中辞典

Prog and Luminous say right side over left, which makes it seem odd that it's 左前. 新和英中辞典 says right side under left, with an explanation that it's from someone else's POV (daijs also mentions this).

@@ -21,1 +21,1 @@
-<gloss>wearing a kimono with the right side tucked under the left (normally used only for the dead)</gloss>
+<gloss>wearing a kimono with the right side tucked under the left (from someone else's POV; normally used only for the dead)</gloss>

@@ -21,2 +21,1 @@
-<gloss>wearing a kimono with the right side tucked under the left</gloss>
-<gloss g_type="expl">this is normally used only for the dead</gloss>
+<gloss>wearing a kimono with the right side tucked under the left (normally used only for the dead)</gloss>

gg5 koj daij

@@ -16,2 +16,5 @@
-<gloss>downward course</gloss>
-<gloss>being badly off</gloss>
+<gloss>going badly (one's business, one's fortune, the economy)</gloss>
+<gloss>being in a bad financial situation</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -19,0 +22,1 @@
+<gloss g_type="expl">this is normally used only for the dead</gloss>

女坂　女きょうだい　女親 etc.
Isn't this clearer?

@@ -20 +20 @@
-<s_inf>less polite than 女性 or 女の人</s_inf>
+<s_inf>blunt outside of compounds; 女性 or 女の人 are preferable</s_inf>

"I think half of the point was that things like 女の刑事 and 女のライター are fine, not blunt"

I don't think this is true. 女の人 and 女の子 are fine but outside of these conpoubds, e.g. in 女のライター it's blunt.


女子アナウンサー	32553	48.0%
女性アナウンサー	33645	49.6%
女性のアナウンサー	978	1.4%
女アナウンサー	275	0.4%
女のアナウンサー	362	0.5%

I think half of the point was that things like 女の刑事 and 女のライター are fine, not blunt
the 2014 wording worked well for that

OK. I'll split off おみな and drop the others.

@@ -15,20 +14,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>おみな</reb>
-<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>おうな</reb>
-<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>うみな</reb>
-<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>おな</reb>
-<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>おんあ</reb>
-<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

おみな is in meikyo (古), sankoku (雅) and smk (雅). I think it should be split out into a separate [arch] or [poet] entry. I'd drop the others.
I don't it's worth having おな or おんあ as sk forms. 女 is almost always written with kanji.
How about this for the note?
I don't think "female sex" is needed.

@@ -40 +40,2 @@
-<s_inf>usu. considered blunt when used alone; 女性 or 女の人 are preferred</s_inf>
+<s_inf>less polite than 女性 or 女の人</s_inf>
+<gloss>woman</gloss>
@@ -42,2 +42,0 @@
-<gloss>woman</gloss>
-<gloss>female sex</gloss>

おんあのこ	45
Typo'd the typo... Maybe keep おな as a [sk]but do away w the other oks?

おんあ	1637	61.7%
おなのこ	1015	38.3%
おんあの子	0	0.0%
Should we maybe remove the oks? Don't know that they add much (even though it was I that added them 11 years back)

--


"被害者の女" site:asahi.com - 1 hit
「レイプ事件の被害者の女と加害者の男のあいだに生まれた、「極限的な愛」を描く作品だが
"被害者の女性" site:asahi.com - 81 uniques

Picking up the thread from 4 years ago... 女 is used on its own in news reporting but I think almost exclusively for criminals/suspects and almost never for the victim. In the same sentence here the victim is 女性, the suspect 女
https://www.jomo-news.co.jp/articles/-/413520
群馬県中之条町で2020年、自殺願望があったとされる女性が殺害され、所持品を奪われた事件で、強盗殺人や現住建造物等放火未遂などの罪に問われた埼玉県の無職の女（34）は1日までに…
https://news.yahoo.co.jp/articles/8c77e1d032e9d8c9bc4c3d38a9f61ea3800698c2
いわゆる「コンセプトカフェ」で働く女が、客の女性に売春をさせた疑いで逮捕された。
https://www.yomiuri.co.jp/national/20231110-OYT1T50317/
駅で女が酔った女性に「家まで送りましょう」、介抱装い自宅まで送り金品奪った疑い
Even when you search for 女を,女に the top news results are 女を逮捕, 女に逮捕状.

@@ -31,0 +32,4 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>おんあ</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>
@@ -35,2 +39,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1419990">男・おとこ・1</xref>
-<s_inf>can be blunt when used alone</s_inf>
+<xref type="see" seq="1419990">男・1</xref>
+<s_inf>usu. considered blunt when used alone; 女性 or 女の人 are preferred</s_inf>

Hard to get the right balance here. It's not really sensitive in the usual sense, and it's 
totally context dependent. I'm inclined to stick with what we've had for the last 5 years.

It is context-dependent. If you do a Google news search for 女が/女に/女を, you'll see plenty of examples where it's not remotely offensive or derogatory.
It's not considered polite in formal situations or when referring to a specific woman, but it's used all the time in casual speech without being rude.

I do think it's a useful note, but I agree it's less useful if it doesn't mention what to use instead. I don't think it's super 
context-dependent, 女 outside of compounds is almost always somewhat offensive/derogatory. Actually we could maybe do away with the 
note and just tag it with [sens]... though that might cause confusion (i.e. it's NOT [sens] in 女の子, 女姉妹, etc.)

Do we even need the note? I don't think it's particularly helpful to tell a learner that a word sounds "blunt" unless we explain what alternatives there are, but then it gets a bit complicated. It all depends on context, anyway.
I suggest dropping it.

I think so.

@@ -36 +36 @@
-<s_inf>can be blunt when used alone; 女の人 or 女の子 are preferable</s_inf>
+<s_inf>can be blunt when used alone</s_inf>

Too much?

@@ -36 +36 @@
-<s_inf>can be blunt when used alone</s_inf>
+<s_inf>can be blunt when used alone; 女の人 or 女の子 are preferable</s_inf>

How is this?

@@ -35,0 +36 @@
+<s_inf>can be blunt when used alone</s_inf>

Discussed this with a native speaker who said that using 
either 女 or 男 without affixing ～の人 (etc.) just comes across 
as 下品. 
_
Maybe a note? [note="can be perceived as vulgar when used 
outside of compounds"]

I think it's a good point, as it is a bit plain and blunt. It's also a nuance that I wouldn't expect a JE to reflect well if at all.
I don't think "sens" is the right tag. We need something to indicate bluntness. I'm suggesting putting "female" first to make it a bit more impersonal.

@@ -35,0 +36 @@
+<gloss>female</gloss>
@@ -37 +38 @@
-<gloss>female</gloss>
+<gloss>female sex</gloss>
@@ -44 +45 @@
-<gloss>woman</gloss>
+<gloss>(someone's) woman</gloss>

”「フランスの女。」と海。
「ちょっと、せめて、フランスの女！じゃなくて、女の人って言い方してよ～。"
http://soratoumih.exblog.jp/19453269/
"「しょうがねぇだろ……俺は『女』が苦手だ」
　あれ、何かデジャヴュ？
　じわじわと嫌な予感がする天馬達とは違い、水鳥はその発言に眉を顰める。
「コラ、剣城。それはどういう意味だ」
「どうって……そのままの意味ですけど」
「あたしに喧嘩売ってんのか」
「は？　売ってませんよ……ああ、成る程。違います、先輩は『女』じゃなくて『女の
人』です」
「…………は？」"
http://www.pixiv.net/novel/show.php?id=891010
"955
3 年前
ツイッター、女って… 
言葉遣いにほんとにひくわ。こういうきついとこ直接会った時に遭遇するとなんか凹む。 
ていうか怖い。
[...]
957
3 年前
>>955 
何気ないつぶやきで性格の悪さが浮き彫りになるなんてね。 
(女)じゃなくて(女の人)にしてたらずいぶん印象が変わったのに。 
普段から口が悪くて、ブスとかデブとかキモいとかダサいとか言いたい放題だから仕方な
いか… 
自分が言われたら冗談だとしても、ムッチャ怒るのに。"
http://r-2ch.com/t/model/1271412527/
"私は外国人に日本語を教えているのですが、｢昨日うちに男が来ました｣とか｢学校の
前に女がいます｣のような文を作ってしまう人がいるので、｢単に『男』『女』と言うと悪
い意味になることが多いので、『男の人』『女の人』を使ってください｣と教えていま
す。"
http://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q111
07497081

gg5
 2 〔愛人·情婦〕 a [one's] woman [girl, lover, girlfriend, mistress].
 捨てられた女　an abandoned [a discarded] woman [lover].
 彼に女ができた.　He's got a woman now.
 ·夫に女がいるらしい.　It seems my husband has another woman.
 女に入れ揚げる　lavish money [gifts] on a woman [women]
 ·おれの女に手を出すな.　Don't make any passes at my woman.
 女の元へ通う　frequently visit one's lover's [girlfriend's, mistress's] residence.
 女をこしらえる　take a lover [mistress]; take up with a girl [woman]
 ·女を囲う　keep a mistress
 ·女をもてあそぶ　toy [play, trifle, dally] with a girl [woman]; make a plaything of a woman.

if there's a reference for it, sure.  but gg5 uses it pretty freely without any indication of it

Should there maybe be a [sens] tag on 女? I mean I've been 
taught the preferred form is 女の人, 女性 or 女の子 and that 女 
by itself can be quite rude.

@@ -35,0 +35,3 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1419990">男・おとこ</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1419990">男・おとこ</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1419990">男・おとこ・1</xref>

koj, daij, gg5, prog, nc, meikyo

i think most of the readings added do not apply to both senses.  please check them and split if necessary

@@ -17,1 +17,1 @@
-<reb>おうな</reb>
+<reb>おみな</reb>
@@ -21,1 +21,1 @@
-<reb>おみな</reb>
+<reb>おうな</reb>
@@ -34,0 +34,1 @@
+<pos>&n-pref;</pos>
@@ -35,1 +36,8 @@
-<gloss>girl</gloss>
+<gloss>female</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>female lover</gloss>
+<gloss>girlfriend</gloss>
+<gloss>mistress</gloss>
+<gloss>woman</gloss>

daijs, daijr,  nikk

daijs and daijr give 8-9 meanings, including wife, mistress, 
prostitute, sexually mature woman, and female servant

@@ -16,0 +16,16 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>おうな</reb>
+<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>おみな</reb>
+<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>うみな</reb>
+<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>おな</reb>
+<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>
@@ -19,0 +35,1 @@
+<gloss>girl</gloss>

煩さい	119	0.0%

rare and irregular

@@ -19,2 +19 @@
-<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>
-<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

煩い	121168
五月蝿い	112593
五月蠅い	26896
煩さい	119
うるさい	2235184

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -18,0 +20 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

I guess so.

うっさい	37562
ok to include here?

@@ -25,0 +26,4 @@
+<re_nokanji/>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>うっさい</reb>

@@ -55,0 +56 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

I agree. Also, its frequency seems to come from the fact that it's a band name. Best omitted, I think.

@@ -23,4 +23,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>うるせー</reb>
-<re_nokanji/>
@@ -60,1 +56,2 @@
-<gloss>Shut up!</gloss>
+<gloss>shut up!</gloss>
+<gloss>be quiet!</gloss>

can it really qualify as adj-i if it doesn't end with い?

うるせー is used too.

@@ -23,0 +23,4 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>うるせー</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>

Unidic/ngrams

うるさい is by far the most common, but ウルサイ is a bit more common than the kanji forms.

@@ -23,0 +23,4 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ウルサイ</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>

@@ -51,1 +51,1 @@
-<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<pos>&int;</pos>

After creating that last entry, I noticed in the comment log for the word that a meaning of "be quiet" (similar to "shut up") had been vetoed once before.  I do think it would be useful to have it, though... I ran across the word in a conversation in a book, and I came here to find a meaning that seemed appropriate, but none of the more literal meanings in the other senses really captured this more colloquial and figurative use.

http://www.berlitz.co.jp/wm/07/0419.htm  
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20121126232002AAogyeK  
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090923230731AAv5VT6  
http://www.meetup.com/japanese-7/messages/boards/thread/6005630?thread=6005630

@@ -50,0 +50,4 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<gloss>Shut up!</gloss>
+</sense>

koj, daij, gg5, prog

'persistent' could arguably be its own sense, but i think 'bossy' belongs with 'fussy'.  swapping senses to match other dictionaries, and adding glosses to cover what i guess was the intended amendment above

@@ -16,0 +16,4 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>煩さい</keb>
+<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
@@ -28,4 +32,1 @@
-<gloss>fussy</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -35,0 +36,1 @@
+<gloss>persistent</gloss>
@@ -39,0 +41,7 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>fussy</gloss>
+<gloss>finicky</gloss>
+<gloss>picky</gloss>
+<gloss>particular</gloss>
+<gloss>nagging</gloss>
+<gloss>fastidious</gloss>

ぼくはコーヒーのブレンドにはなかなかうるさいほうでね。
I'm quite a stickler when it comes to my blend of coffee.

i think there are some instances where we've done a split like that, but i agree that it's unnecessary

I think this is just a way of using sense 1.

@@ -41,4 +41,0 @@
-<sense>
-<pos>&int;</pos>
-<gloss>be quiet! (command, esp. when someone is being obnoxious or impudent)</gloss>
-</sense>

Add “be quiet!” sense – v. commonly used in conversation. (Well, admittedly, *I* get told this a lot.)

@@ -41,0 +41,4 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&int;</pos>
+<gloss>be quiet! (command, esp. when someone is being obnoxious or impudent)</gloss>
+</sense>

Syn: 騒がしい

@@ -22,0 +22,1 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1403000">騒がしい</xref>

@@ -25,1 +25,1 @@
-<xref type="see">帰す</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1221240">帰す・かえす</xref>

Is 徒広い correct?
No KM ngram hits.
Most web hits seem to point back here.

Google ngrams (249).

Seems to be a typo (they sound almost the same). Common enough to be recorded, I think.

@@ -10,0 +10,4 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>だたっ広い</keb>
+<ke_inf>&ik;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
@@ -12,0 +16,7 @@
+<re_restr>だだっ広い</re_restr>
+<re_restr>徒広い</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>だたっぴろい</reb>
+<re_restr>だたっ広い</re_restr>
+<re_inf>&ik;</re_inf>
@@ -15,1 +26,1 @@
-<gloss>very (excessively) spacious</gloss>
+<gloss>excessively spacious</gloss>

unidic list

だたっ広い gets 31k hits, but it would be best to confirm if simple misspelling

Entry created

no, it's playback speed of the video.

GG5: 倍速[四倍速, 二十四倍速]CD-ROM ドライブ 【電算】 a 「double-speed [four-speed, twenty-four-speed] CD-ROM drive; a 「2X [4X, 24X] CD-ROM drive.
ルミナス: 倍速ドライブ 〔コンピューター〕 double-speed drive

Aren't they sense 2?

It seems that, for the first gloss, it isn't always double. The YouTube app has the various playback speeds translated as 1.25倍速, 1.5倍速, etc.

Thanks. Must have been a typo.

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<pos>&adj-pn;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-f;</pos>
@@ -18 +18 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">speed of CD drive, etc., in multiples of 150 KB/s</gloss>
+<gloss>speed of CD drive, etc., in multiples of 150 KB/s</gloss>

it had ( and ] paired together in the first entry, for some reason

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>double-speed (drive, etc.]</gloss>
+<gloss>double-speed (drive, etc.)</gloss>

GG5, etc.

By itself it's double speed.

@@ -10,0 +11,5 @@
+<pos>&adj-pn;</pos>
+<field>&comp;</field>
+<gloss>double-speed (drive, etc.]</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
@@ -13,2 +18 @@
-<gloss>x</gloss>
-<gloss g_type="expl">speed of CD drive etc., multiples of 150 KB/s</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">speed of CD drive, etc., in multiples of 150 KB/s</gloss>

https://kotobank.jp/word/倍速-759097
https://whatis.techtarget.com/definition/X-compact-disc-access-time

50倍速のCD-R = 50x CD-R

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&ctr;</pos>
@@ -13 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>speed (of CD ROM drives)</gloss>
+<gloss>x</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">speed of CD drive etc., multiples of 150 KB/s</gloss>

Entry created

@@ -5,1 +5,1 @@
-<keb>倍速ＣＤＲＯＭドイブ</keb>
+<keb>倍速ＣＤＲＯＭドライブ</keb>

Entry created

@@ -17,2 +17,2 @@
-<gloss>To be as busy as a bee</gloss>
-<gloss>Like Christmas and a birthday feast rolled into one</gloss>
+<gloss>to be as busy as a bee</gloss>
+<gloss>like Christmas and a birthday feast rolled into one</gloss>

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>盆と正月が一緒に来たよう</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -11,0 +15 @@
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>

Entry created

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<misc>&sl;</misc>
+<misc>&m-sl;</misc>

I suspect it's more common now. I think we should record it.

@@ -13 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>Naruto run (running with one's arms outstretched behind one, as in the anime Naruto)</gloss>
+<gloss>Naruto run</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">running with one's arms outstretched behind, as in the anime Naruto</gloss>

I get 32,000 results on google
I feel somebody who doesn't know the anime "Naruto" willl have no idea what 
this means if they come across it

G n-grams: 22
~6000 googits

I don't think we need this. Neither the term nor the act are especially common. People who do it are always imitating the anime.

https://twitter.com/search?q="ナルト走り”&src=typeahead_click&f=live
https://twitter.com/search?q="Naruto run”&src=typed_query&f=live

More common in English than in Japanese, but still relatively common in Japanese