Daijr (マタニティードレス)

Drop it. Those "gaiX" tags just mean "found in some common old glossaries".

@@ -9 +8,0 @@
-<re_pri>gai1</re_pri>

マタニティードレス	2039
マタニティドレス	3618

Can gai1 really be right for マタニティードレス?

@@ -4,0 +5,3 @@
+<reb>マタニティドレス</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -6,0 +10,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>マタニティ・ドレス</reb>

Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -8,0 +8,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>マタニティー・ドレス</reb>
+</r_ele>

@@ -19,0 +20 @@
+<gloss>to dip up</gloss>

gg5
G n-grams:
 すくい上げる	16721
 掬い上げる	 4751
 掬いあげる	  928
 すくいあげる	 5924

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>すくい上げる</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -8 +11 @@
-<keb>すくい上げる</keb>
+<keb>掬いあげる</keb>
@@ -16 +19 @@
-<gloss>to dip or scoop up</gloss>
+<gloss>to scoop up</gloss>

G n-grams:
 照りつける	130475
 照り付ける	  9457
 照付ける	   393
 てりつける	   540

reordering

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>照付ける</keb>
+<keb>照りつける</keb>
@@ -11 +11 @@
-<keb>照りつける</keb>
+<keb>照付ける</keb>

I agree, (So do several kanwas.)

In KanjiDic 染 has the kun-readings 
  そ.める, -ぞ.め, -ぞめ, そ.まる, し.みる, じ.みる, し.み, -し.める
I think
  そ.まる、そ.める、し.みる、 し.み
should suffice.
The readings -ぞ.め, -ぞめ　are redundant
The reading じ.みる should be -じ.みる and is also redundant.
The reading -し.める is for 焚き染める and 煮染める which are quite rare.

G n-grams:
シミ	2308123
染み	701986
しみ	1867821

シミ is not explicitly in references, but Google images for it mostly show skin spots, whereas those for 染み are more general spots.

@@ -32,0 +33,2 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<s_inf>esp. シミ</s_inf>

koj daijs

https://dl.ndl.go.jp/info:ndljp/pid/1188633/408
mentions exports of Japanese playing cards coming to an halt 大戦中.
I was going to mark the new sense [obs] and call it
"the Great War; World War I" until I saw koj's definition.

@@ -19,0 +20,6 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1373930">世界大戦</xref>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<gloss>world war</gloss>

OK

i don't think that reading belongs here.  it is not supported by any dictionary.  references like "frequency of okurigana use" are not trustworthy here.  for a very common term with an obvious reading such as this one, okurigana is only supplied when the author is intentionally using an unusual reading (e.g. gikun) probably for artistic purposes

personally i would not bother with this now that おおいくさ is properly recorded.

@@ -16,3 +15,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>おおいくさ</reb>
-</r_ele>

いくさ is a kun reading of 戦, so not "ik". おおいくさ is more usually associated with 大軍/おおいくさ which means the same as 大戦 but is much less common. I'll set up an entry for it. They could be merged, but we don't like merges based on marginal readings, as is the case here.

https://www.asahi.com/ajw/articles/14426250
VOX POPULI: End finally in sight for Japan’s ‘tanshin funin’ custom
"Nippon no Tanshin Funin," a report written by author Kiyoshi Shigematsu, takes issue with the eponymous Japanese 
corporate custom under which married men leave their families behind to live as "temporary bachelors" when assigned to 
posts that make daily commuting from their homes impossible.
https://www3.nhk.or.jp/nhkworld/en/news/backstories/1284/
Leading snack maker Calbee decided in June to stop transferring employees for an unaccompanied posting.

@@ -16,2 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>job transfer away from one's home</gloss>
-<gloss>taking up a new post leaving one's family behind</gloss>
+<gloss>(intra-company) job transfer away from one's family</gloss>
+<gloss>unaccompanied posting</gloss>

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

@@ -15 +14,0 @@
-<misc>&yoji;</misc>

溺れて死ぬ	1401
溺れ死ぬ	4861

Sitting here for quite a while. Maybe an xref is enough.

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<s_inf>usu. as 溺れて死ぬ etc. when referring to death through drowning</s_inf>
+<xref type="see" seq="2012460">溺れ死ぬ</xref>

Given that we have 溺れ死ぬ as an entry, I don't think the note is needed. With these glosses, the meaning is unambiguous.

We keep chewing on this one.

https://www3.nhk.or.jp/news/html/20220827/k10013790261000.html
海転落の孫助けようとした祖父溺れ死亡

discussed in the FB translator's group recently (Aug 21).
this note is maybe a little crude and might need some work but something like it might be helpful?

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<s_inf>usu. as 溺れて死ぬ etc. when referring to death through drowning</s_inf>

OK

@@ -35,2 +35,2 @@
-<gloss>to read (a calibration, a tape, etc.)</gloss>
-<gloss>to scan (a bar code)</gloss>
+<gloss>to read (calibration, tape, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>to scan (bar code)</gloss>

大辞林 + 大辞泉

It does not mean "read between the lines" by itself

@@ -22,0 +23,7 @@
+<gloss>to read and understand</gloss>
+<gloss>to take in</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5r;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>to sense from external cues</gloss>
@@ -24 +30,0 @@
-<gloss>to read between the lines</gloss>
@@ -29,0 +36 @@
+<gloss>to scan (a bar code)</gloss>

daij

@@ -11,0 +11,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>読取る</keb>

I think that's plenty of forms.

Reopening for review by other editors.

https://github.com/JMdictProject/JMdictIssues/issues
https://groups.google.com/g/edict-jmdict/

Not really a conversation to be had here.
Feel free to start a new discussion on the github issues forum or mailing list.

"とじ籠もる"*

i see no downside in including many search-only forms
if they're used in the wild (twitter, etc.) they might appear somewhere else and are useful
for example "とじ籠こもる" is at the very least used in a ranpo novel

@@ -29 +29 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2849036">龍頭・たつがしら</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2849036">龍頭</xref>

The part of a bell in question is called a canon, not a cannon.

@@ -25 +25 @@
-<gloss>cannon (of a bell)</gloss>
+<gloss>canon (of a bell)</gloss>

See discussion on entry 2849036.

@@ -25,0 +26,5 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2849036">龍頭・たつがしら</xref>
+<gloss>something in the shape of a dragon's head (esp. a helmet crest)</gloss>

ューズ	96615
りゅうず	8844
リュウズ	11956

From WWW images quite a lot are, and also for リュウズ.

@@ -13,0 +14,4 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>リュウズ</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>
+</r_ele>

Adding yoji tags based on gakken, shinmeikai and-or jitenon
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -26,0 +27 @@
+<misc>&yoji;</misc>

和気あいあいたる	108
わきあいあいたる	0
KM n-grams:
和気あいあい	7021	58.2%
和気藹々	3890	32.2%
和気藹藹	62	0.5%
和気靄々	18	0.1%
和気靄靄	4	0.0%
わきあいあい	1074	8.9%

Possibly a mis-parse in the Google n-grams. The JEs all use 和気あいあい in examples. The KM ones used a later parser/lexicon.

@@ -27 +26,0 @@
-<misc>&uk;</misc>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
177,042	 17.9%	和気あいあい
128,457	 13.0%	和気藹々
  3,189	  0.3%	和気藹藹
  1,285	  0.1%	和気靄々
    213	  0.0%	和気靄靄
677,200	 68.6%	わきあいあい

apparently [uk]?

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -17,0 +19 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -24,0 +27 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

Kanji thought it was, but his collection has turned out to be a bit over-inclusive.

@@ -25 +24,0 @@
-<misc>&yoji;</misc>

Is this yoji?

koj daijs

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1955700">舳先・へさき</xref>

Not entirely sure [vt] is needed. Only meikyo, iwakoku, and sankoku have both [vi] and [vt] tags. 

daijr/s, koj, meikyo, and sankoku don't say that the -も- okurigana is optional. I'm tagging 身籠る and 身篭る as [io].

姙る was just a rare itaiji form. Probably not needed.

@@ -8,6 +7,0 @@
-<keb>身籠る</keb>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>身篭る</keb>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
@@ -18 +11,0 @@
-<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -26 +19,9 @@
-<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>身籠る</keb>
+<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>身篭る</keb>
+<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>
@@ -32,0 +34 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
@@ -34 +35,0 @@
-<pos>&vt;</pos>

sankoku, iwakoku
Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ を身ごもる │  3,581 │ 15.5% │
│ を身ごもっ │ 19,455 │ 84.5% │
╰─ーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬───────┬───────╮
│ 身ごもる │ 5,593 │ 42.5% │
│ 身籠る　 │ 4,347 │ 33.0% │
│ 身篭る　 │ 1,961 │ 14.9% │
│ 身籠もる │   415 │  3.2% │
│ 身篭もる │    24 │  0.2% │ add rK
│ 妊る　　 │   129 │  1.0% │ add rK (daijr/s, obunsha, shinkok)
│ 孕る　　 │     0 │  0.0% │ add sK (daijr)
│ 姙る　　 │     0 │  0.0% │ remove - i dont see it anywhere
│ みごもる │   705 │  5.4% │
╰─ーーーー─┴───────┴───────╯

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -20,0 +22 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -24,3 +26 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>姙る</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -33,0 +34 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

daijs

@@ -11,0 +12,6 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>身籠もる</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>身篭もる</keb>

G n-grams:
 身ごもる	5593
 身籠る	4347
 身篭る	1961
 妊る	 129
 孕る	No matches
 姙る	No matches
 みごもる	 705

@@ -8,0 +9,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>身篭る</keb>

gg5
G n-grams:
 身を護る	  7336
 身を守る	289320
 みをまもる	   693

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>身を護る</keb>
+<keb>身を守る</keb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<keb>身を守る</keb>
+<keb>身を護る</keb>

https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=身を守る

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<gloss>to protect oneself</gloss>

Added additional PoS via batch update.Added additional PoS via batch update.
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -15,0 +15,1 @@
+<pos>&v5r;</pos>

Agree. Much more likely to be 帆を揚げる. etc.

G n-grams:
 帆を張る	3017
 帆を揚げる	1110
 帆を上げる	 752
 帆を立てる	 244
 帆をかける	  92
 帆を掛ける	  39

Not sure we need this expression.
We don't have any other 帆を～ expressions.

@@ -15,0 +15,1 @@
+<pos>&v1;</pos>

gg5 koj daijs

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>bow (e.g. of a ship)</gloss>
+<gloss>bow (of a ship)</gloss>

koj daijs

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1571380">艫・とも</xref>

daijs

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>舳</keb>

Corrected. Interestingly the Nelsons and S&H have prow for 艫.

koj

In kanjidic 舳 has the reading とも and 艫 has the reading へさき.
I think that is wrong
舳 = へ, へさき = bow (of a ship)
艫 = とも = stern
The definition of 艫 is also wrong.

Aligning.

@@ -13,2 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>furthermore</gloss>
-<gloss>adding to the above-mentioned</gloss>
+<gloss>another</gloss>
+<gloss>one more</gloss>
@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
@@ -19,2 +20,2 @@
-<gloss>not quite</gloss>
-<gloss>not very good</gloss>
+<gloss>(not) quite</gloss>
+<gloss>(not) very</gloss>

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2070970">もう一つ・2</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2070970">もう一つ・3</xref>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2070970">もう一つ</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2070970">もう一つ・1</xref>
@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2070970">もう一つ・2</xref>

大辞林

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2070970">もう一つ</xref>
@@ -14,0 +16,6 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<gloss>not quite</gloss>
+<gloss>not very good</gloss>
+<gloss>lacking</gloss>
+</sense>

Entry created

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<reb>マタニティー</reb>
+<reb>マタニティ</reb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>マタニティ</reb>
+<reb>マタニティー</reb>
@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -17 +15,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

Daijr, GG5, etc. etc.

See rejected  2790810.

@@ -7,0 +7,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>マタニティ</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -9,1 +12,12 @@
-<gloss>maternity</gloss>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<gloss>maternity (motherhood)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<gloss>maternity (pregnancy)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<gloss>maternity dress</gloss>

Entry created

gg5 koj daij have おほん
I have seen it written おっほん
G n-grams:
 おほん	4423
 おっほん	2037
 おほんおっほん	No matches

@@ -5 +5,4 @@
-<reb>おほんおっほん</reb>
+<reb>おほん</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>おっほん</reb>

Entry created

GG5, etc.
チビッコ	147054
チビっ子	24304
チビッ子	37616

Messier, but they're common enough to be worth including.

@@ -6,0 +7,6 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>チビッ子</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>チビっ子</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -8,0 +15,13 @@
+<re_restr>ちびっ子</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>チビッこ</reb>
+<re_restr>チビッ子</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>チビっこ</reb>
+<re_restr>チビっ子</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>チビッコ</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>
@@ -14,0 +34,3 @@
+<gloss>kid</gloss>
+<gloss>kiddy</gloss>
+<gloss>tot</gloss>

ちびっこ	585445
ちびっ子	336075
チビっ子	24304
チビッ子	37616

I think the glosses could be improved

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

Entry created

daijr/s
うかうか   	3223
うかうかして	1760

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<pos>&vs;</pos>

G n-grams:
 うかうか	90252
 ウカウカ	13390

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ウカウカ</reb>

Entry created

マタニティーブルー	7677
マタニティブルー	16658

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>マタニティブルー</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -8 +11 @@
-<reb>マタニティブルー</reb>
+<reb>マタニティ・ブルー</reb>
@@ -12,3 +14,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>マタニティ・ブルー</reb>

GG5, ルミナス, Daijr

Merge.

@@ -7,0 +7,9 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>マタニティブルー</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>マタニティー・ブルー</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>マタニティ・ブルー</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -9,1 +18,3 @@
-<gloss>maternity blue</gloss>
+<gloss>maternity blues</gloss>
+<gloss>post-natal depression</gloss>
+<gloss>post-partum blues</gloss>

Entry created

aligning

@@ -13 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>bow of a ship</gloss>
+<gloss>bow (of a ship)</gloss>
+<gloss>prow</gloss>

daij

マタニティ	1700401
マタニティー	71722

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>マタニティハラスメント</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -8 +11 @@
-<reb>マタニティハラスメント</reb>
+<reb>マタニティ・ハラスメント</reb>
@@ -12,3 +14,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>マタニティ・ハラスメント</reb>

http://www.eeoc.gov/laws/types/pregnancy.cfm

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<gloss>pregnancy discrimination</gloss>

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>マタニティー・ハラスメント</reb>
+<reb>マタニティハラスメント</reb>
@@ -11 +11 @@
-<reb>マタニティハラスメント</reb>
+<reb>マタニティー・ハラスメント</reb>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/マタニ�%8
3%86%E3%82%A3%E3%83%8F%E3%83%A9%E3%82%B9%E3%83%A1%E3%83%B3%E3%
83%88

@@ -9,0 +10,6 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>マタニティハラスメント</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>マタニティ・ハラスメント</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -13 +19 @@
-<gloss>workplace harassment against pregnant women</gloss>
+<gloss>workplace discrimination against pregnant women</gloss>

from the rejected イキってる entry

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<gloss>to be full of oneself</gloss>

zokugo
http://zokugo-dict.com/02i/ikiru.htm

Closing.

Setting up that split.

@@ -15,4 +14,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>ﾀﾋね</keb>
-<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>
-</k_ele>
@@ -26 +22 @@
-<s_inf>氏ね, 市ね, ﾀﾋね are Internet slang</s_inf>
+<s_inf>氏ね and 市ね are Internet slang</s_inf>

https://www.weblio.jp/content/タヒね

I'm inclined to split ﾀﾋね off into a separate entry along with タヒね and たひね. It can xref to here.

the current structure causes this to happen:
https://i.imgur.com/tE7DKCH.png

I assume ﾀﾋね is still read as "しね", and belongs in the kanji欄?

should たひね also be added to the reading欄 as [ik], also maybe restricted?

with a brief search, an instance of someone using "たひね" came up
https://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q13122598918

@@ -14,0 +15,4 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ﾀﾋね</keb>
+<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
@@ -17,4 +20,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>ﾀﾋね</reb>
-<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
@@ -26 +26 @@
-<s_inf>氏ね, 市ね are Internet slang</s_inf>
+<s_inf>氏ね, 市ね, ﾀﾋね are Internet slang</s_inf>

〈手／て／テ〉を〈取（り）／とり／トリ〉〈合／あ〉っ

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 手を取り合っ │ 55,647 │ 79.7% │
│ 手をとりあっ │ 10,345 │ 14.8% │ - add, sK
│ 手を取りあっ │  2,315 │  3.3% │ - add, sK
│ 手をとり合っ │  1,177 │  1.7% │ - add, sK
│ 手を取合っ　 │    142 │  0.2% │
│ てを取り合っ │     51 │  0.1% │
│ てをとりあっ │    187 │  0.3% │
╰─ーーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -5,0 +6,12 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>手をとりあう</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>手を取りあう</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>手をとり合う</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

@@ -25,0 +26 @@
+<gloss>to link hands</gloss>

大辞林 + 大辞泉

「手を取り合って生きる」

@@ -15,0 +16,12 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<pos>&v5u;</pos>
+<gloss>to do together</gloss>
+<gloss>to go arm in arm</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<pos>&v5u;</pos>
+<gloss>to join forces</gloss>
+<gloss>to cooperate</gloss>
+</sense>

目が合った	128609
GG5, 中辞典, etc.

In a way it's rather obvious, but I think it's useful to know thia expression is fairly common.

@@ -20,0 +21,3 @@
+<gloss>catching someone's eye</gloss>
+<gloss>making eye contact</gloss>
+<gloss>meeting a person's gaze</gloss>

daijs chujiten
目が合う	114687
目が会う	3692
目があう	11222

Really surprised this wasn't in alread.
Apologies for the lousy gloss

Rather marginal.

weblio https://ejje.weblio.jp/content/真空チューブ列車
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/真空チューブ列車
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vactrain

jitsuyo

功を焦る	1502
功をあせる	392

GG5, Eijiro.

1 example sentence.

@@ -13 +13,3 @@
-<gloss>to act hastily in pursuit of glory or success</gloss>
+<gloss>to act hastily in pursuit of glory</gloss>
+<gloss>to hasten after success</gloss>
+<gloss>to be too eager to succeed</gloss>

https://meaning-book.com/blog/20190215131639.html
https://www.weblio.jp/content/功をあせる

Daijr, ＫＯＤ追加語彙

daijs

like 転校

ｇｇ５

Seems パタニティ is more common than パタニティー

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>パタニティハラスメント</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -8 +11 @@
-<reb>パタニティハラスメント</reb>
+<reb>パタニティ・ハラスメント</reb>
@@ -12,3 +14,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>パタニティ・ハラスメント</reb>

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2801520">マタニティーハラスメント</xref>

ＫＯＤ追加語彙

Intended that for the abbreviated form.

@@ -18,2 +17,0 @@
-<misc>&abbr;</misc>
-<misc>&col;</misc>

https://www.huffingtonpost.jp/entry/story_jp_5cf4cc76e4b0e346ce809a4a
"夫の勤め先は元々、転勤の多い会社だ。転勤そのものについて2人は「仕方がないこと」と納得した。一方で、「せめて着任を1〜2カ月遅らせられないか」と会
社とは何度も交渉したが、全く聞き入れられなかった。「これはパタハラではないか」と感じたという。

「パタハラ」とは、育児をする男性への上司や同僚からの嫌がらせを総称するパタニティ（父性）・ハラスメントの略だ。"

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<gloss>parent who behaves like everyone owes them</gloss>
+<gloss>entitled parent</gloss>

I guess it's OK, but it would nice to have a watch-list for ephemera.

https://brava-mama.jp/2017071487914/
”「子持ち様」って呼ばれるのはどんな人？ ママという看板の間違った使い方"
+30 past 12 hrs on twitter

Worth having?
ironical I guess so joc?

GG5

@@ -16,2 +16,3 @@
-<gloss>the beginning</gloss>
-<gloss>the spark that lit the fuse</gloss>
+<gloss>origin of an affair</gloss>
+<gloss>spark that lit the fuse</gloss>
+<gloss>beginning</gloss>

jitsuyo
事の発端	55286
ことの発端	19787

Feel free to improve the glosses, of 
course.

ＫＯＤ追加語彙  〔巨大な紙に大きな筆で字を書く演技; 音楽に合わせてダンスをしながらグループで行うことが多い〕

Probably should.

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<gloss g_type="expl">large-scale team calligraphy combined with music and dance</gloss>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/書道パフォーマンス甲子園
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Performance_calligraphy

Should we add an explanatory gloss?

パタニティー	No matches
パタニティ	115

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<reb>パタニティー</reb>
+<reb>パタニティ</reb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>パタニティ</reb>
+<reb>パタニティー</reb>

Daijs

Since we have the longer harassment term, we should also have this to prevent parsing issues. マタニティー is an entry.

arch perhaps?

Might it be better to add 大戦 as a kanji form to this entry instead of having おおいくさ on 1414360?

Koj, Daijr
大戦	3135577
大軍	108230

See discussion on 1414360.

G n-grams
 靄がかかっ	12159
 靄が掛かっ	 1326
 もやが掛かっ	  936
 もやがかかっ	13917

@@ -9,0 +10,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>もやが掛かる</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -17 +19,0 @@
-<misc>&uk;</misc>

Changed my mind.

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1207590">掛かる・かかる・3</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1207590">掛かる・かかる・11</xref>

I'm changing the sequence number because the form has changed.

@@ -1,2 +1 @@
-<ent_seq>1574140</ent_seq>
@@ -5 +4 @@
-<keb>靄がかかった</keb>
+<keb>靄がかかる</keb>
@@ -8 +7 @@
-<keb>靄が掛かった</keb>
+<keb>靄が掛かる</keb>
@@ -11 +10 @@
-<reb>もやがかかった</reb>
+<reb>もやがかかる</reb>
@@ -15,2 +14,6 @@
-<gloss>hazy</gloss>
-<gloss>misty</gloss>
+<pos>&v5r;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1207590">掛かる・かかる・3</xref>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<s_inf>usu. as もやがかかって or もやがかかった</s_inf>
+<gloss>to be hazy</gloss>
+<gloss>to be misty</gloss>

もやがかかった	4881
もやがかかって	8299
もやがかかる	635

Maybe a もやがかかる entry with a note, "usu. as もやがかかって or もやがかかった",

靄がかかった	4394
靄が掛かった	465
もやがかかった	4881
もやがかかって	8299
もやがかかる	635
ルミナス has an example, and there's a もやがかかっていた usage in a Tanaka sentence.

I think this expression is worth having, but I'm not sure what the form should be.

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<gloss>misty</gloss>

Daijr, ルミナス

I think it's sufficiently covered by the イキる entry,

イキってる	1071
いきってる	816
イキる	1834

We already have "イキる; いきる (v5r) (col) to act cocky; to put on airs". I'm not sure this is needed.

@@ -4,3 +4,3 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>イキるイキってるイキる</keb>
-</k_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>イキってる</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -11,2 +11,3 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>being too full of oneself</gloss>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
+<gloss>to be too full of oneself</gloss>

https://nlab.itmedia.co.jp/nl/articles/1707/09/news012.html
https://studywalker.jp/minitest/0001/012/
https://hinative.com/ja/questions/7665496

Daijr

koj daijs

Daijr

koj daijr

@@ -20,0 +21 @@
+<misc>&derog;</misc>

@@ -25 +24,0 @@
-<gloss g_type="lit">short person</gloss>

https://kotobank.jp/word/ちび助-2061655
　　　　same as ちょびすけ, see daijr for this word
https://dic.nicovideo.jp/a/ちびすけ
　　　　小さい人を呼ぶ蔑称である
G n-grams:
 ちびすけ	51162
 チビ助  	44381
 チビすけ	21069
 ちび助  	11530