I endorse Rene's comments.

@@ -10 +9,0 @@
-<misc>&uk;</misc>

204 (龍鬚菜) & 22 (竜髭菜) ngrams but see below

including these as headwords makes a mess of the entry.  it's almost inconceivable to me that they would ever be provided without telling the reader without アスパラガス furigana, and all the web hits i find just seem to be websites saying "did you know asparagus is also written as 竜髭菜", etc.  google image hits for 龍鬚菜　look nothing like what we normally call "asparagus" in english, and suggest that they correspond to Asparagus schoberioides, which is a different species

this could perhaps take a "also written as 竜髭菜" note, but given its rarity, and the fact that no dictionary bothers, i don't think it's needed

--
実用日本語表現辞典 and a number of the other sources provided at weblio do not appear to be particularly great.  if they are not one of the major kokugos, please do some additional checking at least into frequency of use

@@ -4,6 +3,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>龍鬚菜</keb>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>竜髭菜</keb>
-</k_ele>
@@ -12 +5,0 @@
-<re_inf>&gikun;</re_inf>

実用日本語表現辞典 https://www.weblio.jp/content/竜髭菜

@@ -3,0 +4,6 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>龍鬚菜</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>竜髭菜</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -5,0 +12 @@
+<re_inf>&gikun;</re_inf>
@@ -9,0 +17 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

@@ -10 +10 @@
-<gloss>okra (herb) (Abelmoschus esculentus)</gloss>
+<gloss>okra (Abelmoschus esculentus)</gloss>

I don't think an expl gloss is necessary here.

@@ -12,2 +12 @@
-<gloss>casket</gloss>
-<gloss g_type="expl">ornamental box</gloss>
+<gloss>casket (ornamental box)</gloss>

gakken katakana
キャスケット
casket
小箱．

yes, the correct splitting here is:
カスケット;キャスケット = casket

キャスケット;カスケット = casquette

@@ -6,0 +7,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>キャスケット</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -9,17 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>style of watch with a rectangular face</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>ornamental box</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>fishing lure</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="2826649">キャスケット</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2826649">キャスケット</xref>
-<gloss>(largish) cap</gloss>
-<gloss>newsboy cap</gloss>
-<gloss>newsie cap</gloss>
+<gloss>casket</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">ornamental box</gloss>

britt: https://kotobank.jp/word/カスケット-44539

This entry needs a bit of an overhaul. What I'd suggest:

1. Remove the watch sense. Not in any refs. Searching 「カスケット 時計」 only turns up that single Baby G watch.
2. Remove "fishing lure". Not in any refs. Seems to be mainly the name brand of the company, in which case it should only be in namedict.
3. Keep "ornamental box", integrating "casket" as a gloss.
4. Since the newsboy sense has a different etymology ("casquette"), it needs to be its own entry.

To summarize, this entry should only be "casket" as an ornamental box. There needs to be a new entry for the newsboy sense as "カスケット".

Aligning.

@@ -20,0 +21 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2826649">キャスケット</xref>
@@ -21,0 +23,2 @@
+<gloss>newsboy cap</gloss>
+<gloss>newsie cap</gloss>

Indeed.

@@ -10 +9,0 @@
-<misc>&uk;</misc>

Removing 袋鼠；更格廬；長尾驢. I think they are so obscure and unsupported they just clutter the entry. Anyone digging will probably notice these comments.

@@ -4,9 +3,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>袋鼠</keb>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>更格廬</keb>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>長尾驢</keb>
-</k_ele>

I don't think we need to include super-obscure ateji forms unless they're widely supported by the major refs. Daijr appears to be the only one that has these.

Again, not sure we need them. Is 更格廬 ateji? While the two others are gikun/jukujikun?

@@ -3,0 +4,6 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>袋鼠</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>更格廬</keb>
+</k_ele>

Doesn't appear to be adj-no.

@@ -10 +9,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -15 +13,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

Daijr

Close to just noise. Drop it.

@@ -7,3 +6,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>パナラマ</reb>

* daijs
* koj
* enwiki: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panorama#As_popular_spectacle

パノラマ	891556
パナラマ	37

The second form is nearly negligible and not in any refs. Warrants [ik] or removal?

@@ -15,0 +16,5 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<gloss>panoramic painting</gloss>
+</sense>

至上	503901
至上な	910
至上の	68273

Chuujiten: "至上の highest"

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

gg5

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<gloss>trilby</gloss>

aligning with 中折れ帽子

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<pos>&vs;</pos>
@@ -16,0 +16 @@
+<gloss>fedora</gloss>

Daijr

I think 2 and 3 are the same sense. Make sure the glosses are nouns.

@@ -14,0 +14,1 @@
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
@@ -20,6 +21,2 @@
-<gloss>for something to be interrupted in the middle</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<pos>&vs;</pos>
-<gloss>broken in the middle</gloss>
+<gloss>being interrupted in the middle</gloss>
+<gloss>being broken in the middle</gloss>

daijirin

Can be used in non sexual contexts e.g. 中折れ階段

@@ -13,0 +13,1 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1424810">中折れ帽子</xref>
@@ -14,0 +15,11 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<gloss>stopping in the middle</gloss>
+<gloss>for something to be interrupted in the middle</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<gloss>broken in the middle</gloss>

gg5

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<gloss>trilby</gloss>

中折帽	800
中折れ帽	7398

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>中折れ帽</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -12,0 +16 @@
+<gloss>fedora</gloss>

gg5

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<gloss>trilby</gloss>

中折帽子   	252
中折れ帽子	3706

Changed headword based on n-grams.

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>中折帽子</keb>
+<keb>中折れ帽子</keb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<keb>中折れ帽子</keb>
+<keb>中折帽子</keb>

Simplify restrictions.

@@ -15,6 +14,0 @@
-<re_restr>鳩胸</re_restr>
-<re_restr>はと胸</re_restr>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>ハトむね</reb>
-<re_restr>ハト胸</re_restr>

prog

Should just be a regular gloss.

@@ -25 +25 @@
-<gloss>pigeon chest (Pectus carinatum, deformity of the chest, protruding ribs and sternum)</gloss>
+<gloss>pigeon chest (deformity of the chest, protruding ribs and sternum)</gloss>
@@ -26,0 +27 @@
+<gloss>pectus carinatum</gloss>

daijs (has a diagram for stirrup: https://kotobank.jp/word/鳩胸-603227#E3.83.87.E3.82.B8.E3.82.BF.E3.83.AB.E5.A4.A7.E8.BE.9E.E6.B3.89)

@@ -31,0 +32,12 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>iron armor with protruding chest</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>curved front portion of a stirrup</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>curve at the base of a shamisen neck</gloss>

daijr, meikyo, DIJG

There are two senses here.

@@ -9,0 +10,2 @@
+<s_inf>after a noun</s_inf>
+<gloss>when it comes to ...</gloss>
@@ -11,6 +13,8 @@
-<gloss>when it comes to ...</gloss>
-<gloss>if it comes to ...</gloss>
-<gloss>as far as ... is concerned</gloss>
-<gloss>if it's the case that</gloss>
-<gloss>if it's true that</gloss>
-<gloss>if ... happens, then ...</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<pos>&conj;</pos>
+<gloss>if it's the case that ...</gloss>
+<gloss>if it turns out that ...</gloss>
+<gloss>if it's true that ...</gloss>
+<gloss>in that case</gloss>

どんな時どう使う日本語表現文型辞典 http://jlptdictionary.com/viewentry.php?intEntryID=16919

@@ -13,0 +14,3 @@
+<gloss>if it's the case that</gloss>
+<gloss>if it's true that</gloss>
+<gloss>if ... happens, then ...</gloss>

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<gloss>funeral palor</gloss>
+<gloss>funeral parlor</gloss>

gg5

This refers to the business, not the person.

@@ -16 +16,3 @@
-<gloss>undertaker</gloss>
+<gloss>undertaker's office</gloss>
+<gloss>funeral home</gloss>
+<gloss>funeral palor</gloss>

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>undertaker's</gloss>
+<gloss>undertaker</gloss>

月即別	< 20
月祖別	< 20
ウズベキスタン	169172

Removing 月即別；月祖別.
As with カンガルー, these virtually unknown kanji versions are a distraction. I thought about a note, but I don't think they warrant even that.

@@ -4,6 +3,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>月即別</keb>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>月祖別</keb>
-</k_ele>
@@ -15 +8,0 @@
-<misc>&uk;</misc>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/ウズベキスタン#国名
https://matome.naver.jp/odai/2133635631711573501

I'm tempted to say it's ateji, but it might be gikun. Seems to be based off https://kotobank.jp/word/ウズベク・ハン(月即別汗)-34637

@@ -3,0 +4,6 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>月即別</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>月祖別</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -8,0 +15 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

daij, gg5, prog
ばっさり	168272
バッサリ	224145

Splitting into senses.

@@ -6,0 +7,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>バッサリ</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -9 +12,11 @@
-<gloss>with a single stroke</gloss>
+<pos>&adv-to;</pos>
+<misc>&on-mim;</misc>
+<gloss>(cutting) with a single stroke</gloss>
+<gloss>lopping off (branches, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>(cutting hair) short</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
+<pos>&adv-to;</pos>
+<misc>&on-mim;</misc>
+<gloss>drastically (slash a budget, etc.)</gloss>
@@ -11 +24 @@
-<gloss>drastically</gloss>
+<gloss>ruthlessly (discard, etc.)</gloss>

Entry created

gakken katakana

カスケット
casquette 《フランス》｟服｠
前びさしのついた帽子．
キャスケットとも．

the correct splitting under our new system is by language of origin. so these should be merged

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>カスケット</reb>

カスケット	7821
キャスケット	80714

"newsboy cap" is a particularly American term/concept. I think we need the original more descriptive gloss as well.

@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+<gloss>(largish) cap</gloss>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/キャスケット
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newsboy_cap

if approved, we should update sense 4 of カスケット, as well as add an xref there pointing to this entry.

@@ -10 +10,2 @@
-<gloss>(largish) cap</gloss>
+<gloss>newsboy cap</gloss>
+<gloss>newsie cap</gloss>

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<field>&cards;</field>

shorter and more correct.

@@ -13,2 +13 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2826486">株札・かぶふだ・1</xref>
-<gloss>local card game (usu. a local version of hanafuda or kabufuda)</gloss>
+<gloss>local card game (esp. hanafuda)</gloss>

I'm sorry if I said that, or gave that impression, as we obviously do use abbreviations a lot. Apart from the obvious ones like "etc.", "i.e." and "e.g.", there are "usu." (457), "esp." (1977), "incl." (79), "var." (205), etc.
The Shorter OED has 4 pages of abbreviations at the front. Many are field tags, but it has a lot I wouldn't bother with. To me it's about saving display space. I see we have 14 cases of "oft." This is only one character shorter than "often", and I doubt it's needed.
I'll think about drafting something for the editorial policy.

I'm fine either way, but I distinctly 
remember you (Jim) telling me a good 
number of years ago in a comment that we 
only use such abbreviations in notes, and 
I've tried to adhere to that ever since. 
(there's a chance I'm misremembering, but 
I don't think I am). Might it be an idea 
to make a note of it in the policy 
document? The words we usually abbreviate 
and the ones we don't, etc.

Such abbreviations are fine in glosses. They're widely used in English lexicography. The main point is that they shorten the text (reducing paper/screen space) without making it harder to read.

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<gloss>local card game (usually a local version of hanafuda or kabufuda)</gloss>
+<gloss>local card game (usu. a local version of hanafuda or kabufuda)</gloss>

I agree. Also, we have entries for these uses of バック and ハメ.

I agree with Rene that this isn't common enough to be worth including.

I wondered about "doggy style" as a gloss, but the images mostly show the "passive" partner on top. Anyway, not my, er, field of expertise.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2537960">ハメ</xref>

i'm sure things have changed since the ngrams were compiled but this gets 25 google and 5 k-m

plus:
"In order to show you the most relevant results, we have omitted some entries very similar to the 57 already displayed.
If you like, you can repeat the search with the omitted results included."

this gloss is what the images suggest.  we have ハメ marked as vulg

see note above; i'm not sure this is worth recording as the meaning is pretty obvious from context and it does not seem to be particularly common

@@ -6,0 +7,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>バック・ハメ</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -9,2 +12,2 @@
-<misc>&col;</misc>
-<gloss>having sex with one's back turned away</gloss>
+<misc>&vulg;</misc>
+<gloss>fucking from behind (e.g. doggy style)</gloss>

Adult websites

No idea how to phrase this gloss

gg5, koj

Difficult to translate.
Moving "rustle" to the end. It doesn't fit with most of the examples.

@@ -10 +9,0 @@
-<gloss>with a rustle</gloss>
@@ -12,0 +12 @@
+<gloss>with a thud</gloss>
@@ -13,0 +14,2 @@
+<gloss>with a swish</gloss>
+<gloss>with a rustle</gloss>

GG5, 中辞典
ばさりと	3458
ばさり	5267
ばっさり	168272
ばさっと	11159

These ばさ../ばっさ... adverbs are all close, and the references are rather inconsistent as to meaning.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&bus;</field>

超過収益力	1050

超過+収益+力

https://www.money-zine.com/definitions/investing-dictionary/excess-earning-power/
会計用語キーワード辞典 https://kotobank.jp/word/超過収益力-803583
日英・英日専門用語辞書 https://ejje.weblio.jp/content/超過収益力

digital daijisen, sanseido etc https://kotobank.jp/word/烏鵲-439656

Daijs, https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/オクラ
陸蓮根	527
おかれんこん	54
オカレンコン	181

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1034270">オクラ</xref>

https://kotobank.jp/word/陸蓮根-1728456

daij, koj
G n-grams: 117
http://yourei.jp/瑰麗

If it's also adj-na (which it is in this case), we don't need an adj-nari tag.
Not arch, just obscure.

@@ -12,2 +12,3 @@
-<pos>&adj-nari;</pos>
-<gloss>beautiful</gloss>
+<misc>&obsc;</misc>
+<gloss>extraordinarily beautiful</gloss>
+<gloss>exceptionally pretty</gloss>

Is "adj-na" implied by "adj-nari"? I forget. I don't think this is archaic, based on the examples in daij.
We really should have a tag for ［文］, shouldn't we? [literary]?

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>

digital daijisen etc https://kotobank.jp/word/瑰麗-458735

Probably arch

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1424800">中折れ帽</xref>
@@ -13,0 +15 @@
+<gloss>trilby</gloss>

中折れハット	26243
中折ハット	509

中折れ帽   	7398
中折れ帽子	3706

More common than the other 中折れ＊ terms, so worth an entry IMO.

金欲	8028
きんよく	616
Unidic
https://president.jp/articles/-/1397
https://store.line.me/stickershop/product/1120659/ja
https://oshiete.goo.ne.jp/qa/6703601.html
Eijiro: 金欲のとりこになる be captivated by hunger for money

Not in main references, but listed in Unidic as a morpheme and meaning fairly clear from usage examples.

GG5
かいれい	2310
改令	127

OOps. Not used here.

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<re_nokanji/>

britannica https://kotobank.jp/word/ウズベク・ハン(月即別汗)-34637
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Öz_Beg_Khan