OK, I'll drop the 石鹸玉 and close it. I've proposed a 石鹸玉/せっけんだま entry.

@@ -10,3 +9,0 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>石鹸玉</keb>

石鹸玉	722
石けん玉	213
https://blog.goo.ne.jp/take10nbo/e/02aff32bb5b03b6e193a66668c7144e3 - picture with both 石鹸玉 and シャボン玉 captions.
https://ja.pngtree.com/freepng/transparent-soap-bubbles_488041.html - soap bubbles labelled 透明石鹸玉

Yes, 石鹸玉 is quite an outlier, and as the n-grams show, it's quite possibly often せっけんだま rather than しゃぼんだま.
That said, I'm seeing some images of soap bubbles labelled 石鹸玉, as well as cases where they are plainly soap balls.
What I suggest is adding a new 石鹸玉/石けん玉/せっけんだま entry with two senses: soap balls and soap bubbles, with the bubble sense xrefed to here with a note like "occ. read しゃぼん玉". Would that work?

ngrams:
シャボン玉 = 504440
石鹸玉 = 722

relatively speaking, this form is extremely rare (~0.1%).  in addition, google image hits for 石鹸玉 are mostly *not* of soap bubbles, but of soap balls or seemingly irrelevant things, so it is arguably not that common absolutely either.

further, there's no indication how often 石鹸玉 is expected to be read as シャボンだま without providing furigana.

i'm inclined to reject

https://headlines.yahoo.co.jp/hl?a=20191209-00010013-magacol-life&p=1

@@ -9,0 +10,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>石鹸玉</keb>

GG5: 一環の 【植】 monocyclic.

@@ -20,0 +21 @@
+<field>&bot;</field>

学術用語英和対訳集、日英・英日専門用語辞書、クロスランゲージ 37分野専門語辞書 https://ejje.weblio.jp/content/一環

PoS is pure guesswork

@@ -18,0 +19,4 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<gloss>monocyclic</gloss>
+</sense>

gg5, daij

@@ -16,3 +16,2 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<gloss>link (e.g. a part of a larger plan)</gloss>
-<gloss>one part of</gloss>
+<gloss>link (e.g. in a chain of events)</gloss>
+<gloss>part (of a plan, campaign, activities, etc.)</gloss>

https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=一環

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<gloss>one part of</gloss>

Thanks for the references, argument, etc.
It seems that 一環とする is the usual verbal form, but 一環して still gets 800k hits (一環として gets 9M). 一環する only gets 2k but 一環とする gets over 1M.
We don't have an "illegal POS" tag, so I suppose it has to go.

I see Unidic (correctly) doesn't have 何年 as a single morpheme, and MeCab/Unidic parses it as a morpheme pair with POSs of "名詞-数詞" and "名詞-普通名詞". It's a single something, but not really a noun. Anyway, I think I'll just put it aside now.

we have 何 as a prefix with this meaning, which, if correct, would make 何年 a single word, not an expression

A good question. We have 何ヵ月, 何箇, 何回, etc. tagged as nouns, but they're not really - you can't say 何回が as a subject. Probably "exp" is safer.
Any other views?

GG5; daijs

I suck at PoS, but should this be [exp]?

@@ -13,0 +14,5 @@
+<gloss>how many years</gloss>
+<gloss>how long</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -15 +19,0 @@
-<gloss>how many years</gloss>

G n-grams 4127641

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -8,0 +10 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

I'm putting it back.

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<s_inf>slightly formal or feminine</s_inf>

The note was really intended for わたし, 
not わたくし (I wouldn't call わたくし 
"_slightly_ formal"). The references were 
all about わたし.

My first thought was "no way" as I was taught that わたし and わたくし were essentially the same. But I agree that the politeness, and slightly feminine nuance, not to mention the later senses, make it an uncomfortable combination. I've proposed a split.

Aside: I first heard わたくし spoken in 1982 when we took my elder daughter (then 10) to a Girls Scouts meeting in Nagano-ken. They had a formal "promise" recital which included use of わたくし. I've also heard it used by males in formal speeches.

@@ -16,4 +15,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>わたくし</reb>
-<re_pri>ichi1</re_pri>
-</r_ele>
@@ -22 +17,0 @@
-<s_inf>slightly formal or feminine</s_inf>
@@ -26,14 +20,0 @@
-<sense>
-<stagr>わたくし</stagr>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<gloss>private affairs</gloss>
-<gloss>personal matter</gloss>
-<gloss>secrecy</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<stagr>わたくし</stagr>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<gloss>selfishness</gloss>
-</sense>

https://urapri.net/watashi-ichininshou
"「私」を一人称に使う男性は、どういう心理があるのでしょうか。
男性の一人称は、一般的に「僕」や「俺」が多いはずです。
仕事だけではなく、プライベートの場でも、わざわざ自分のことを私と呼ぶ男性の心理をご紹介します。
...
1.相手に対してかしこまっている
2.仕事で「私」という癖が抜けない
3.相手に良い印象を与えたいと思っている
4.少し距離を置きたいと思っている"


https://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q13120392353
Q: "男性が自分の事を「私」と言う事をどう思いますか？
[...]
男性なのだから「僕は〜」とかにしないと、女性やネカマ
と勘違いしてしまい大変迷惑です。"
BA: "40歳くらいのおっさんも社会的な場では私って言うでしょう・・・ [...]"
other A: "では政治家も「僕」と言えと。
面接でも「僕」と言えと。
昔の人は全員同じ自称でしたよ。
かしこまっていうのが「私」。
少し緩んだのが「僕」。"

https://www.chishikiyoku.com/entry/2017/06/09/200500
"男で一人称が「私」だと気持ち悪いらしい……どれ使えばいいんだ"

https://kids.nifty.com/cs/kuchikomi/kids_soudan/list/aid_190410280004/1.htm
"私は、ネットでも現実でも一人称が「私」です。
学校とかでいっつもオカマオカマっていじられて
最近ちょっと疲れてます。"
"ビジネス文書などでは、基本的な一人称は「私」ですね。

だからといって、大人っぽいとかは言えないとは思いますが、
その一人称は認めるべきだと思いますけどね。

私は、インターネット上では「私」、
日常生活では「俺」を使っています。"

https://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q11187575106
Q: "男性でプライベートでも一人称に「私」を使う方はいらっしゃいますか？
男性に質問です。
気になる方とLINEをしているのですが、相手の男性が使う一人称が「私」です。
その男性とは特に仕事上で知り合った訳ではないので、なぜ「私」を使うのか気になりました。"
A: "[...] 私は妻や親しい友人には「俺」ですし子供相手には「お父さん」、そこまで親しくない人には「私」・・・"
A: "仕事で常に「私」を使うので、プライベートでも自然と「私」になるのでしょう。
特別深い理由はないと思います。
もっと親密になれば、俺や僕になるかもしれませんね。"

Should we maybe split out　わたくし? I feel it's rather more formal than わたし (could prob. have a [pol] tag), and 2/3 senses are only わたく
し anyway

@@ -21,0 +22 @@
+<s_inf>slightly formal or feminine</s_inf>

@@ -22 +21,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

所ではない	41158
処ではない	1691
どころではない	154140

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

Aligning with 2842324.

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
@@ -14,0 +16,4 @@
+<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2842324">所じゃない・どころじゃない</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2842324">所じゃない・どころじゃない</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2842324">所じゃない・どころじゃない</xref>
@@ -16 +21,5 @@
-<gloss>(strongly emphatic) too preoccupied or busy to even think of ...</gloss>
+<s_inf>used to strongly dismiss something as being far removed from what is true or appropriate</s_inf>
+<gloss>not the time for</gloss>
+<gloss>not the place for</gloss>
+<gloss>far from</gloss>
+<gloss>anything but</gloss>
@@ -18 +27 @@
-<gloss>this is not an occasion for</gloss>
+<gloss>... isn't the word for it</gloss>

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss>.. is out of the question</gloss>
+<gloss>... is out of the question</gloss>

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miscanthus_sinensis

@@ -25 +25 @@
-<gloss>silver grass</gloss>
+<gloss>maiden silvergrass</gloss>

@@ -17,0 +17,4 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ススキ</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>
+</r_ele>
@@ -19,0 +23,1 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

sankoku, daijr

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーー─┬───────────╮
│ ボク │ 6,726,407 │
╰─ーー─┴───────────╯

@@ -15,0 +16,4 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ボク</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>
+</r_ele>
@@ -23,0 +28 @@
+<misc>&col;</misc>

What Robin wrote was fine but obviously some people find it confusing.

singular you, not plural
(a boy, not boys)

@@ -24 +24 @@
-<s_inf>when addressing young boys</s_inf>
+<s_inf>when addressing a young boy</s_inf>

https://kotobank.jp/word/可愛そう・可哀想-2025290
https://kotobank.jp/word/可愛そう-2019091

@@ -18,0 +19,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>可愛そう</keb>

@@ -31 +30,0 @@
-<s_inf>often as 〜に</s_inf>

as Robin pointed out on the other entry, given the 10:1 ratio, I don't think the note holds true or is needed.  i'd say either かわいそうに gets added as suggested or it gets nuked

可哀想に	134415
かわいそうに	318672
可哀想	1148140
かわいそう	2366089

See 可哀想に proposal (2842389).

@@ -30,0 +31 @@
+<s_inf>often as 〜に</s_inf>

See the deleted  2842382 for possible additional kanji forms.

seems hard to believe that this is a common term in the news.  likely to be confounded with a last name, e.g., this pro baseball player/coach
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/尾花高夫

@@ -6,2 +5,0 @@
-<ke_pri>news2</ke_pri>
-<ke_pri>nf45</ke_pri>
@@ -11,2 +8,0 @@
-<re_pri>news2</re_pri>
-<re_pri>nf45</re_pri>

https://kotobank.jp/word/オバナ-823129

the katakana form seems to get some play.  not sure if uk, but i suspect not.  there is some confounding, but オバナ very much comes up short in the ngrams

@@ -13,0 +14,4 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>オバナ</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>
+</r_ele>

koj, meikyo

@@ -16 +16,3 @@
-<gloss>Japanese pampas grass</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1475470">薄・すすき</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1475470">薄・すすき</xref>
+<gloss>(ear of) Japanese pampas grass</gloss>

adj-no doesn't agree with the glosses either so we lead with n by convention.

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -12 +12,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>

first pos/gloss agreement

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -12 +12,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<pos>&adv;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>

@@ -13 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>on board</gloss>
+<gloss>on board a ship</gloss>
+<gloss>aboard a ship</gloss>

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1521400">僕・ぼく・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1521400">僕・1</xref>

@@ -12,5 +11,0 @@
-<re_restr>僕女</re_restr>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>ボクおんな</reb>
-<re_restr>ボク女</re_restr>
@@ -20,0 +16 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2826544">ボクっ娘</xref>

僕女	1657
ボク女	1019
ぼく女	79

@@ -6,0 +7,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ボク女</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -8,0 +12,5 @@
+<re_restr>僕女</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ボクおんな</reb>
+<re_restr>ボク女</re_restr>

Daijr (xrefs to ボクっ娘)

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2826544">ボクっ娘・ボクっこ</xref>

wiki
ボク少女（ボクしょうじょ）、またはボクっ子（ボクっ
こ）、ボクっ娘（ボクっこ）、僕女（ぼくおんな）は、 
男性用一人称である「ボク」などを使う少女のこと。

not sure this needs to be an entry 
(depending on how common it actually is)

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<gloss>woman who uses boku to refer to herself</gloss>
+<gloss>woman who uses the usually male personal pronoun "boku" to refer to herself</gloss>

https://www.amazon.co.jp/四面-チーズ卸器-105×80×H235-中-M2180/dp/B004D2D7EM
G n-grams:
おろし器	30026
卸し器	174
卸器	123

Not just vegetables.

@@ -4,0 +5,3 @@
+<keb>おろし器</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -5,0 +9,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>卸器</keb>
@@ -13 +19 @@
-<gloss>(vegetable) grater</gloss>
+<gloss>grater</gloss>

GG5 (has it mixed up in the おろしがね entry.)

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<misc>&sl;</misc>
+<misc>&net-sl;</misc>

Proposed adding the source form.

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2842391">電話突撃</xref>

OK

daijr: "電話突撃からいう語"

I don't think it's right to call it an abbreviation. It's not interchangeable with 電話突撃.

@@ -16 +15,0 @@
-<misc>&abbr;</misc>
@@ -18 +17 @@
-<s_inf>abbr. of 電話突撃</s_inf>
+<s_inf>from 電話突撃</s_inf>

OK. I'll close this now, and propose an alignment of 所ではない with this one. I was considering the removal of それどころじゃない, but that needs some thought.

所じゃない	43177, 処じゃない	863, どころじゃない	195362
所ではない	41158, どころではない	154140, 所ではなかった	4182, どころではなかった	48021
それどころじゃない	76557, それどころではない	43452

I think it should be included. Along with どころではない, it is common, in many examples, meaning not obvious,  etc. They could be combined, although it would be messy. Certainly, the glosses should be aligned - Nicolas used the ones from どころではない.
We already have それどころじゃない/etc. We don't need both. If this goes ahead I think それどころじゃない can be dropped.

daij, gg5

I've tried to improve the glosses & note but this is a tricky one because the translation is highly dependent on context.
I'm not sure this (or どこではない) should even be an entry.

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
@@ -14,0 +16 @@
+<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
@@ -17 +19,5 @@
-<gloss>(strongly emphatic) too preoccupied or busy to even think of ...</gloss>
+<s_inf>used to strongly dismiss something as being far removed from what is true or appropriate</s_inf>
+<gloss>not the time for</gloss>
+<gloss>not the place for</gloss>
+<gloss>far from</gloss>
+<gloss>anything but</gloss>
@@ -19 +25 @@
-<gloss>this is not an occasion for</gloss>
+<gloss>... isn't the word for it</gloss>

http://jlptdictionary.com/viewentry.php?intEntryID=17816

this is not the scientific name of a species.  no real support for ハナススキ here.  google hits for ハナススキ correspond to the name of a singer

the important context of 花="in ear" is missing

for clarity, we should gloss the species name the same as 1475470

@@ -10,4 +9,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>ハナススキ</reb>
-<re_nokanji/>
-</r_ele>
@@ -16 +12,3 @@
-<gloss>maiden silvergrass (Miscanthus sinensis)</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1475470">薄・すすき</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1475470">薄・すすき</xref>
+<gloss>Japanese pampas grass in ear</gloss>

https://www.weblio.jp/content/花薄
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miscanthus_sinensis

植物名辞典 
https://www.webl
io.jp/content/%E
8%8A%B1%E8%96%84

乎婆奈	No matches
乎波奈	No matches
乎花	No matches
美花	21875 - name みか
麻花	5369 - name あさか

I agree it can be dropped. 
The only issue it whether 乎婆奈；乎波奈；乎花；美花；麻花 should go on the 尾花 entry as ik forms, or as a note. I'm leaving it for now.

for example here's all the different ways of writing おばな included in that dictionary, incl. 尾花.
https://www.weblio.jp/content/オバナ

with the exception of 尾花, it's basically a massive collection of obscure forms not supported by any major kokugo.  i think this entry can be dropped.  尾花 covers it

@@ -5,0 +6,15 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>乎婆奈</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>乎波奈</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>乎花</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>美花</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>麻花</keb>

Japanese pampas grass = maiden silvergrass = Miscanthus sinensis.  so the meaning given here seems to mostly overlap with "尾花【おばな】 (ear of) Japanese pampas grass".  we should stick with one english name for clarity

おばな is a gikun reading for 草花 but not for 尾花, but nevertheless they could be merged as 尾花,草花【おばな】.  depends on whether we think 草花【おばな】 is common enough to record.  it's not in any of the major kokugos, only the obscurish 動植物名よみかた辞典 provided

@@ -10,4 +9,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>オバナ</reb>
-<re_nokanji/>
-</r_ele>
@@ -18 +14,3 @@
-<gloss>maiden silvergrass (Miscanthus sinensis)</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1475470">薄・すすき</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1475470">薄・すすき</xref>
+<gloss>Japanese pampas grass (in ear)</gloss>

https://kotobank.jp/word/草花-483128 about half-way down

I think that's VERY dubious. 草花/くさばな/そうか is a very common word, and おばな is the Japanese pampas grass. I can find no other source for this combination and no examples of 草花 being used for Miscanthus sinensis. While I'm reluctant to avoid something in a published dictionary, I feel this one is a step too far.

動植物名よみかた辞
典 
https://kotobank
.jp/word/%E8%8D%
89%E8%8A%B1-
483128

The reason I added it was that it's not the main sense of 不明 (unclear; obscure, ...).
I agree that it's probably a bit redundant.

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1495060">不明・ふめい・2</xref>

gg5

Do we want to include x-refs in cases like this? Unless they help explain the meaning/etymology of an unusual term, I don't think they add much. This is a regular use of 不明.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>unknown nationality (vessel, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>of unknown nationality (of a vessel, plane, etc.)</gloss>

国籍不明	27724
GG5, Eijiro

Two weeks on; I'll clear it. It can be reopened if discussion arises.

石鹸玉	722
石けん玉	213

See the discussion at 1061740/シャボン玉 about the (rejected) addition of 石鹸玉 to that entry.

GG5
白骨死体	13212

@@ -13 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>corpse decomposed into skeleton</gloss>
+<gloss>dry bones of a corpse</gloss>
+<gloss>human skeleton</gloss>

Used in articles such as
https://bunshun.jp/articles/-/4593
https://www.pref.kyoto.jp/fukei/site/sousa/fukutiyama/index.html
https://www.police.pref.niigata.jp/sonota/mimoto_sousa/mimoto_sousa21/mimoto_sousa21.html
http://kyushu.env.go.jp/pre_2006/0326a.html
http://www.newsclip.be/article/2019/09/03/40642.html
So I believe this is a rather common word.

daijr, jwiki

https://kotobank.jp/word/chatボット-1813370

https://it-trend.jp/words/chatbot

I accidentally deleted part of my comment before submitting. Posting again here:
To the anonymous submitter: We don't automatically approve every commonly used expression. Two editors gave their views and left the submission open for others to comment. That's what the comments section is for. We can't read your mind. Your arguments for why a word/expression should be added are welcome. Snide and antagonistic remarks are not.

それはかわいそうに。I’m sorry to hear that. 
彼がかわいそうに。I feel sorry for him.

On reflection, I can see the case for including it but there are a couple of things to note.
かわいそうに is essentially an abbreviation of かわいそうに思う; it can take a subject or function as an interjection. In that respect, it is no different from かわいそう.
If "you cannot derive the meaning of this from the かわいそう entry", that suggests the かわいそう entry needs improving. It's the same word.
To the anonymous submitter: We cannot read your mind. Your arguments for why a word/expression should be added are welcome. Snide and antagonistic remarks are not.

@@ -19 +18,0 @@
-<gloss>poor you!</gloss>
@@ -20,0 +20,2 @@
+<gloss>pour soul!</gloss>
+<gloss>what a pity!</gloss>

可哀想に	134415
可哀相に	45447
可哀そうに	7376
かわいそうに	318672
GG5: まあかわいそうに! What a 「pity [shame]! | Poor 「man [girl, etc.]! | Poor 「thing [soul, creature, 
中辞典: かわいそうに! Poor thing [man, girl, etc.]!
Tanaka: かわいそうに、その少年は車にはねられた。 The poor boy was knocked down by a car.
Tanaka: かわいそうにその子供は餓死寸前だった。 The poor child was on the verge of starvation.

I'm comfortable with it as an entry. Obviously "uk". There are 23 Tanaka sentences with かわいそうに, and in most it seems to be used as a "Poor ..." adjective pattern, often as かわいそうにその....

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

I think this should definitely be an entry. It's surely a grammar point but a pretty damn 
obscure one. I can't think of any other similar expressions except (お)気の毒に. I also 
don't think this is worth this amount of arguing over it so I will just go ahead and 
approve it. If somebody disapproves, feel free to re-open the discussion of course.

I support adding the かわいそうに as an 
expression/interjection as its own entry. 
Its meaning is more than just かわいそう + 
に so the entry will be helpful for users. 
It's also very common. 

Plus, we do already have entries for the 
following:  

お大事に
焦らずに
お気の毒に

which are similar.

gg5

@@ -19,0 +20 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -21,3 +22,3 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<gloss>private affairs</gloss>
-<gloss>personal matters</gloss>
+<xref type="ant" seq="1273170">公・おおやけ・2</xref>
+<gloss>personal (affairs, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>private</gloss>

sense 2 should xref to 1273170 as an antonym but there seems to be some sense confusion over there

i prefer the note over the tag.  it seems weird to tag a pronoun that refers to yourself as "polite", and this is the only first-person pronoun that has a pol tag.  either it should be "humble" or "formal" or something else.  the note is the clearest way

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<misc>&pol;</misc>
+<s_inf>usu. more formal than わたし</s_inf>

The note is supwrfluous. わたし is
not tagged as pol but this is.

@@ -16 +15,0 @@
-<s_inf>usu. more formal than わたし</s_inf>

at least sense 1 is def. uk

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<misc>&sl;</misc>
+<misc>&net-sl;</misc>

電話突撃	5807
Daijr (電凸) entry: 〔電話突撃からいう語。「電突」とも表記〕

We have 電凸/電突 as an entry. It would be handy to have the source form too.
The gloss is from 電凸/電突. Perhaps both could be updated a bit.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">avoiding tax by buying take-out food, then eating it in the store</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">paying less consumption tax by buying take-out food, then eating it in the store</gloss>

https://www.tokyo-np.co.jp/article/economics/list/201911/CK2019110702000163.html
Many WWW hits. Shōgakukan's Top New Words of the Year for 2019 (winner)

Aligning.

@@ -9,2 +9 @@
-<gloss>Pokemon (RPG series) (trademark)</gloss>
-<gloss>Pocket Monsters</gloss>
+<gloss>Pokémon</gloss>

It was there 2000-2015, then deleted because it was in here. I'll raise the possibility of bringing it back.

@@ -9,2 +9,2 @@
-<gloss>Pokemon</gloss>
-<gloss>(abbr) Pocket Monsters (RPG series)</gloss>
+<gloss>Pokemon (RPG series) (trademark)</gloss>
+<gloss>Pocket Monsters</gloss>

Isn't this common enough to be in the main dict?

Been there; visited friends at Google Japan.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roppongi_Hills

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Omotesando Hills</gloss>
+<gloss>Omotesandō Hills</gloss>

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Omotesando_Hills

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tokyo_Midtown