gg5
"株主総会場はやじと怒号で高ぶっていた.　The shareholders meeting was tense with jeering and shouting."

We usually put that sort of information on the first gloss.
I think these glosses still work OK.

@@ -24,2 +24,2 @@
-<s_inf>of one's feelings, etc.</s_inf>
-<gloss>to become aroused</gloss>
+<gloss>to become aroused (of emotions, nerves, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>to become excited</gloss>
@@ -26,0 +27 @@
+<gloss>to become worked up</gloss>
@@ -33,0 +35 @@
+<gloss>to be self-important</gloss>

Probably better as a sense-wide note.

@@ -24 +24,2 @@
-<gloss>(of one's feelings, etc.) to become aroused</gloss>
+<s_inf>of one's feelings, etc.</s_inf>
+<gloss>to become aroused</gloss>

Sense #1 makes it seem like this is a verb that takes a person as its subject: "SHE is highly strung; HE is excited; THEY are worked up; etc." However, as far as I can see, たかぶる rarely takes a *person* as its subject. 
Typically, it takes one's *feelings* (感情, 気分 etc.) or one's *nerves* (神経) as its subject, NOT a person.
E.g.
- 気持ちもすごく高ぶっています
- 高ぶった神経を落ち着かせ、
- 感情が高ぶって眠れなくなった
- 気持ちが高ぶったので
- 不安を感じる時、落ち着かない時、神経が高ぶっている時にできる ...
- 高ぶった肌にかすかに歯を立てられるのはどんな感じだろうと、
- 彼の気持ちが高ぶっている時 : 
- 高ぶったような気分と凝った体に 

In J-E dictionaries, the examples of usage that are given are also like that:
E.g. 
- 感情が高ぶる grow [get] excited 《at》; be worked up 《about》. (新和英中辞典)
- 試験の前で私の神経は*高ぶっていた I was very nervous before the examination. (ルミナス和英辞典)
- 気持ちが高ぶるのを抑えきれない. I am so full of emotion I can't suppress it. (GG5)
- 彼は今神経が高ぶっているから近づかないほうがいい. He is 「highly strung [worked up] right now, so it would be better to stay away from him. (GG5)
(So "highly strung" and "very nervous" and "worked up" seem to correspond to 神経が高ぶっている rather than just 高ぶっている.)

In J-J dictionaries, you get definitions of たかぶる that essentially mean "to become heightened, aroused"; not "to be highly strung".
E.g. 
- 興奮する。亢進する。 「神経が−・る」 (スーパー大辞林 3.0)
- （神経などのはたらきが）高まる。 (三省堂国語辞典)
The Sanseido definition, in particular, strongly suggests that たかぶる rarely if ever takes a person as its subject, and 高まる means "to become heightened" rather than "to be highly strung".

@@ -24,3 +24,2 @@
-<gloss>to be highly strung</gloss>
-<gloss>to get excited</gloss>
-<gloss>to get worked up</gloss>
+<gloss>(of one's feelings, etc.) to become aroused</gloss>
+<gloss>to become stirred up</gloss>

gg5

@@ -32,0 +33 @@
+<gloss>to be pompous</gloss>

closing.  can be raised on the mailing list if needed

i mean our other option is to nuke the majority of these の entries altogether and just expect readers to know that が may be replaced by の when used prenominally

Xのadjい expressions are always prenominal. Only in relative clauses can が can be replaced with の.
The issue is that we have nothing on these entries to indicate that. The glosses and PoS tags on 住み心地が良い and 住み心地の良い are the same.

住み心地のよい	6594
住み心地のよかった	88
住み心地のよくない	23
住み心地がよい	692   <- not an entry
住み心地がよかった	215
住み心地がよくない	98

I agree that the Xのadjい are usually prenominal and inflect far less often than their equivalent Xがadjい brethren, but I think that where possible this should be reflected in their respective translations. Phrases like these ending in an adjective are more likely to be prenominal or sentence-ending. It's probably more a grammar point than something that should be tagged.
I'll close this for now to shorten the list.

i could be wrong, but if memory serves, i think we used [exp,adj-f] for these at one point, or at least the argument has been raised before.  the problem is that the inflection isn't handled correctly. i guess we could call them [exp,adj-f,adj-i] but it seems excessive

dunno what to do but i agree that it would be better if we could indicate that all of these are used prenominally

I think it's looking OK now.

Isn't the "thing inside one's body ..." gloss sufficient for explaining 虫の知らせ? Whether the insect is real or figurative doesn't seem relevant to me. Meikyo and shinmeikai don't even mention the traditional belief.
It might be better to lead with the descriptive gloss and add "believed to ..."

@@ -35,3 +35,3 @@
-<s_inf>from an ancient belief of an internal insect</s_inf>
-<gloss>(one's) latent consciousness</gloss>
-<gloss>something triggering feelings and thoughts</gloss>
+<s_inf>from a traditional belief of an internal insect</s_inf>
+<gloss>thing inside one's body believed to influence one's thoughts and feelings</gloss>
+<gloss>(one's) unconscious</gloss>

Koj: 潜在する意識。ある考えや感情を起こすもとになるもの。古くは心の中に考えや感情をひき起こす虫がいると考えていた。

Maybe this works.

@@ -35,2 +35,3 @@
-<gloss>(one's) unconscious</gloss>
-<gloss>thing inside one's body that stirs one's feelings and thoughts</gloss>
+<s_inf>from an ancient belief of an internal insect</s_inf>
+<gloss>(one's) latent consciousness</gloss>
+<gloss>something triggering feelings and thoughts</gloss>

I still feel quite strongly that an explanatory note on sense 3 is appropriate and helpful. I want to put an xref here from 虫の知らせ but what's the point if we don't explain that this was originally used literally? I think the etymology/traditional belief has bearings on how the word is used/understood today as well.

10 days on. I'll settle on Robin and my preference. It can be reopened if needed.

@@ -35 +34,0 @@
-<s_inf>from the trad. belief that humans have a bug inside which can stir emotions and thoughts</s_inf>

Trimming & standardizing.

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<s_inf>following adjective stem</s_inf>
+<s_inf>following adj. stem</s_inf>
@@ -20 +20 @@
-<s_inf>following adjective stem or noun</s_inf>
+<s_inf>following adj. stem or noun</s_inf>

Probably don't need the second half of the note.
Daijr says "一部の名詞に付いて" for sense 2.

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<s_inf>following adjective stem to represent another's apparent emotion</s_inf>
+<s_inf>following adjective stem</s_inf>
@@ -20 +20 @@
-<s_inf>on nouns also</s_inf>
+<s_inf>following adjective stem or noun</s_inf>

(a) I don't mind the note on sense 1, but I liked "on adj-stem" for brevity.
(b) possibly a note and xref would help sense 2.

@@ -18,0 +19,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1928810">得意がる・とくいがる</xref>
+<s_inf>on nouns also</s_inf>

is the full note necessary on sense 1?  seems obvious from the glosses.  and doesn't sense 2 (at a minimum) also apply to nouns?

I think this and 日本産業規格 should stay as entries here. They are not really named-entities, as they are the labels for the collections of standards.
I have proposed JMnedict entries for the former and current JISC organization names.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<s_inf>former name</s_inf>
+<s_inf>name until 2019</s_inf>

Possibly not needed any more. Already in the names dictionary.

@@ -11,0 +12,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2842035">日本産業規格</xref>
+<s_inf>former name</s_inf>

daij, meikyo, gg5, chujiten
G n-grams:
尻軽	15003
尻がる	No matches

Splitting into senses. The JEs only have sense 1.
Dropping 尻がる.

@@ -6,3 +5,0 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>尻がる</keb>
@@ -16,4 +13,4 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<gloss>agility</gloss>
-<gloss>fickleness</gloss>
-<gloss>frivolous</gloss>
+<gloss>loose</gloss>
+<gloss>promiscuous</gloss>
+<gloss>unfaithful</gloss>
+<gloss>wanton</gloss>
@@ -21,0 +19,15 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>quick</gloss>
+<gloss>brisk</gloss>
+<gloss>energetic</gloss>
+<gloss>active</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>rash</gloss>
+<gloss>thoughtless</gloss>
+<gloss>careless</gloss>
+</sense>

Unidic, Goi Taikei (both have にっぱく alone)

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>にちはく</reb>
+<reb>にっぱく</reb>
@@ -11 +11 @@
-<reb>にっぱく</reb>
+<reb>にちはく</reb>

digital daijisen

@@ -6,0 +7,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>にちはく</reb>
+</r_ele>

Hardly worth it.

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>to repine at one's hard lot</gloss>
+<gloss>to complain about one's hard lot</gloss>

N-grams:
不遇をかこつ	46
不遇を託つ	5

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>不遇をかこつ</keb>
+</k_ele>

Added additional PoS via batch update.Added additional PoS via batch update.
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@
+<pos>&v5t;</pos>

what a mess

I don't think so. I vote for it to go.

Do we really need this?

多ければ多いほどいい	7425
多ければ多い程いい    264
おおければおおいほどいい	< 20

adj-ix/i fixup.

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>多ければ多いほどいい</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -13,0 +17,3 @@
+<keb>多ければ多い程いい</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -17,0 +24,11 @@
+<re_restr>多ければ多いほど良い</re_restr>
+<re_restr>多ければ多いほどよい</re_restr>
+<re_restr>多ければ多い程良い</re_restr>
+<re_restr>多ければ多い程よい</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>おおければおおいほどいい</reb>
+<re_restr>多ければ多いほどいい</re_restr>
+<re_restr>多ければ多いほど良い</re_restr>
+<re_restr>多ければ多い程良い</re_restr>
+<re_restr>多ければ多い程いい</re_restr>
@@ -21 +38 @@
-<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-ix;</pos>

Google n-grams:
多ければ多い程よい	117
多ければ多い程良い	859
多ければ多いほどよい	2978
多ければ多いほど良い	4961
おおければおおいほどよい	22

Yes, I'll create an ~いい entry.

@@ -5 +5,4 @@
-<keb>多ければ多い程よい</keb>
+<keb>多ければ多いほど良い</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>多ければ多いほどよい</keb>
@@ -11,4 +14 @@
-<keb>多ければ多いほどよい</keb>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>多ければ多いほど良い</keb>
+<keb>多ければ多い程よい</keb>
@@ -20,0 +21,2 @@
+<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2827290">多ければ多いほどいい・おおければおおいほどいい</xref>

ノリの良い	52924
ノリのよい	10890
のりの良い	5368
のりのよい	3040
乗りの良い	4557
乗りのよい	975
ノリのいい	89484
のりのいい	6386
乗りのいい	3954

adj-ix/i xix. Missing 乗り versions.

@@ -6,0 +7,22 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>のりの良い</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>乗りの良い</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>乗りのいい</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>乗りのよい</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ノリのいい</reb>
+<re_restr>ノリの良い</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>のりのいい</reb>
+<re_restr>のりの良い</re_restr>
+<re_restr>乗りの良い</re_restr>
+<re_restr>乗りのいい</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
@@ -8,0 +31,7 @@
+<re_restr>ノリの良い</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>のりのよい</reb>
+<re_restr>のりの良い</re_restr>
+<re_restr>乗りの良い</re_restr>
+<re_restr>乗りのよい</re_restr>
@@ -11 +40,4 @@
-<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-ix;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1354720">乗り・のり・4</xref>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1901140">ノリが良い・ノリがよい・3</xref>

Xref problem

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1901140">ノリが良い・3</xref>

N-grams:
ノリの良い	52924
ノリのいい	89484
ノリのよい	10890

Fix POS. Split.

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>ノリのいい</reb>
+<reb>ノリのよい</reb>
@@ -12,2 +12,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1901140">ノリが良い</xref>
-<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<xref type="see" seq="1901140">ノリが良い・3</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2822160">ノリのいい</xref>

Entry created

adj-ix/i fix.

Xref problem

@@ -9 +8,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1901140">ノリが良い・3</xref>

Split from 2238120.

nikk

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

gg5
G n-grams:
億劫がら	        2809	  
億劫がらず	2426

@@ -12,2 +12,5 @@
-<gloss>to show unwillingness to do</gloss>
-<gloss>to be reluctant to do</gloss>
+<s_inf>usu. in the negative</s_inf>
+<gloss>to show unwillingness (to do)</gloss>
+<gloss>to be reluctant (to do)</gloss>
+<gloss>to look annoyed</gloss>
+<gloss>to show signs of finding something bothersome</gloss>

gg5

Helpful to have.

G n-grams:

まあいいか 219,647 58.5%
まいっか　  49,786 13.3%
まあいっか  42,002 11.2%
まっいいか  37,341  9.9% <- adding
まっいっか  25,768  6.9% <- adding
まいいっか     903  0.2% <- [sk]
まぁいっか  No matches   <- [sk]

@@ -13,0 +14,6 @@
+<reb>まっいいか</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>まっいっか</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -14,0 +21 @@
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
@@ -17,0 +25 @@
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

Looks good.

Less context-specific glosses.

@@ -21,2 +21,5 @@
-<gloss>oh well, I'll take it then</gloss>
-<gloss>I guess it's OK</gloss>
+<misc>&col;</misc>
+<gloss>oh well, fine</gloss>
+<gloss>fine, I guess</gloss>
+<gloss>alright, I suppose</gloss>
+<gloss>OK, then</gloss>

This has been sitting here for a month. I'll approve it and if anyone wants to discuss it, it can be reopened.

Looking at examples, I don't really think a "to ..." works that well.
There's a sentence I can index.

@@ -16,2 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>to stand out (from others)</gloss>
-<gloss>to become significantly different</gloss>
+<gloss>a gap develops</gloss>
+<gloss>a significant difference emerges</gloss>

perhaps "to diverge; to differ", etc.

"勉強する人としない人とでは差がついています    There is a gap [lit: a gap has developed] between those who study and who don’t study."
"一艇身以上の差がつく" - "a gap of at least one boat length develops"

I'm not sure it's possible to gloss this as "to ~". It means "a gap/difference develops". The subject is always 差.

https://hinative.com/ja/questions/1804389 : 差がつく => 差(difference)が，より大きくなる
http://3040english.info/gap-difference/
差がつく	348887
差が付く	18527

Quite common, and the meaning a bit muddy (common 付く problem). Probably worth keeping.

@@ -6,0 +7,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>差が付く</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -11,3 +14,4 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>to become different (better)??</gloss>
-<gloss>to stand out from others (??)</gloss>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<pos>&v5k;</pos>
+<gloss>to stand out (from others)</gloss>
+<gloss>to become significantly different</gloss>

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>to stand out from others (??)</gloss>

https://kotobank.jp/word/藩屏・藩屛-363760
https://ejje.weblio.jp/content/藩屏

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
藩屏	2942
藩屛	No matches

From 1074040.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<s_inf>name from 2019</s_inf>

i think so.  we might consider moving the old one to enamdict now or after some set period

https://www.meti.go.jp/policy/economy/hyojun-kijun/jisho/jis.html

New name since July of this year. We have the former name (日本工業規格) in the main dictionary so I assume this can go here.

Daijr

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<gloss>Tanka people</gloss>
+<gloss>Tanka people (of southern China)</gloss>

https://ja.wikip
edia.org/wiki/%E
8%9B%8B%E6%B0%91
Britannica

"里地里山は、農地、ため池、樹林地、草原など多様な自然環境を有する地域です。"
里地里山	7210
里地	24632
里山	863962

A slightly different take on it. It's clearly 里地 + 里山. I've just proposed the 里地 entry.

@@ -12 +12,3 @@
-<gloss>land that has been cultivated over a long period of time to exist in harmony with the natural environment around it.</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2842038">里地</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2018870">里山・2</xref>
+<gloss>mountain villages and neighbouring agricultural, forest, etc. areas</gloss>

https://www.env.go.jp/nature/satoyama/jyuuyousatoyama.html

This term seems to be used a lot within biology articles and websites. Not sure if it would be better to have the entry together or separate as I have seen articles that only use 里地.

Daijr: 里山と、その周辺にある農地や集落などを含めた地域。

I'm copping out and going for GG5's simple gloss.

ご心配なく	211632
心配ない	237137
心配しない	184858

Yes common, but hardly the sort of you'd need to look up in a dictionary. ない can be appended to heaps of things. 結構です is extremely common, but ...

It's certainly common but I don't think it needs to be an entry.

https://thesaurus.weblio.jp/content/心配ない

I'm sure I'm not the only one who's heard someone repeating 心配ない!心配ない! as a response

gg5
G n-grams: 4993

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<gloss>on the occasion of</gloss>

に当たり	951809
にあたり	2013446
Daujr - equates it to に当たって and に際して, which are both entries.

@@ -10,0 +11,4 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2136040">に際して</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1009820">に当たって・にあたって</xref>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

https://www.weblio.jp/content/に当たり

encountered in 2019 book

Incorrect reading. Correct reading on 5582553.

I think this can go from here. It's not really a named-entity, and it's in JMdict.

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/日本産業規格

I'm not sure how best to indicate in the names dictionary that this is an old name (if it's necessary at all).

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>Nihonkougyoukikaku</gloss>
+<gloss>Japanese Industrial Standards (former name)</gloss>
+<gloss>JIS</gloss>