OK. Indexed now.

Reopen.

Since we're tagging it as "exp" I think the "to", etc. should be included fully.
There are ~140 sentences using this. I'd like to set up examples for each sense, so I;ll approve and then reopen.

@@ -14,2 +14,2 @@
-<gloss>(to) anyone</gloss>
-<gloss>(to) everyone</gloss>
+<gloss>to anyone</gloss>
+<gloss>to everyone</gloss>
@@ -19,2 +19,2 @@
-<gloss>(by) anyone</gloss>
-<gloss>(by) everyone</gloss>
+<gloss>by anyone</gloss>
+<gloss>by everyone</gloss>
@@ -24,2 +24,2 @@
-<gloss>(in) everyone</gloss>
-<gloss>(in) anyone</gloss>
+<gloss>in everyone</gloss>
+<gloss>in anyone</gloss>

Should the to's, by's, and in's really be in brackets, when they're all what's differentiating the different senses?

Sense 1 examples:
だれにも言うなよ - don't say it *to* anyone
誰にも明白だ - it's clear *to* everyone
Sense 2 examples:
誰にも止められない - can't be stopped *by* anyone
誰にも気付かれずに - unnoticed *by* everyone
誰にもできる仕事 - job that can be done *by* anyone
Sense 3 examples:
誰にも夢がある - everyone has dreams / [lit] there are dreams *in* everyone
誰にも過ちがある - everyone makes mistakes / [lit] there are mistakes *in* everyone

I'd like to suggest splitting the senses according to the uses of に, so that each sense has a different meaning. "Anyone" can appear in positive sentences so I don't think a positive/negative split is the way to go.
For this proposed split to work, we'd need example sentences indexed for each sense, but I think this approach is ultimately clearer.
I should note that even with this split, a single sense may contain multiple meanings of に.

@@ -14,2 +14 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1416860">誰も・1</xref>
-<s_inf>effectively 誰も with に</s_inf>
+<gloss>(to) anyone</gloss>
@@ -16,0 +16,4 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<gloss>(by) anyone</gloss>
@@ -21,5 +24,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1416860">誰も・2</xref>
-<s_inf>with neg. verb</s_inf>
-<gloss>(to) anyone</gloss>
-<gloss>(by) anyone</gloss>
-<gloss>(to) none</gloss>
+<gloss>(in) everyone</gloss>
+<gloss>(in) anyone</gloss>

daijs, 百科事典マイペディア

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ブズキ</reb>

ＫＯＤ追加語彙, RP

Usually don't try and "explain" English glosses, but this may be an exception.

@@ -9 +9,4 @@
-<gloss>bouzouki (musical instrument)</gloss>
+<field>&music;</field>
+<lsource xml:lang="gre"/>
+<gloss>bouzouki (instrument)</gloss>
+<gloss>bousouki</gloss>

daijr

Saw this while searching for another term and was thrown for a loop trying to ascertain what it was.

@@ -9 +9 @@
-<gloss>bouzouki</gloss>
+<gloss>bouzouki (musical instrument)</gloss>

Entry created

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -9 +10 @@
-<ke_inf>&ik;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -13 +13,0 @@
-<re_restr>じゃ無い</re_restr>
@@ -18 +18 @@
-<re_restr>ぢゃ無い</re_restr>
+<re_inf>&ik;</re_inf>

I've split off the kana-only more-colloquial versions. I think the "ik" was in the wrong place.

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&ik;</ke_inf>
@@ -18,9 +18,0 @@
-<re_inf>&ik;</re_inf>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>じゃねー</reb>
-<re_nokanji/>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>じゃねぇ</reb>
-<re_nokanji/>

even though it is "nokanji", i don't think we would normally keep a reading merged together with a headword with which it cannot possibly correspond.  じゃねー/じゃねぇ cannot match じゃ無い, so i don't think they should be in here.

i am more indifferent on ぢゃない, but given that it's marked ik, and corresponds to only one of the headwords, i think it should be split out

ぢゃない is pronounces the same way as じゃ
ない so I don't think it should be split 
out together with じゃねー.

じゃ無い	399899
ぢゃ無い	11231
じゃない	72991758
ぢゃない	140601
じゃねー	1458222
じゃねぇ	1103887

As these are more colloquial, perhaps they should go in their own entry?

daijs - ［名・形動］

I don't think this should be [exp] - our other ～足らず entries don't seem to be (only checked two of them, though)

@@ -17 +17,2 @@
-<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>

You guys, not me, are the ones making a dictionary and it's in your 
interest, not necessarily mine, that the dictionary is as complete as 
possible. The way I see it, I'm doing you a favor by letting you know 
that hey, this one common word is missing, you might want to include it. 
Being met with a hostile sourpuss attitude because I didn't hand it to 
you on a silver plate is simply unbecoming, especially when it would have 
taken you 5 seconds of effort to realize it's included in other major 
dictionaries. Apparently you (Rene) thought that time (and then some) was 
wiser spent on "schooling" me. I get that this is a volunteer effort for 
you too, but if doing even the minimal amount of work needed to confirm a 
simple entry suggestion like this is a bother, then maybe you should ask 
yourself why you've decided to take up lexicography as a hobby in the 
first place.

ＫＯＤ追加語彙 (言葉 entry extension): 人間関係では言いすぎもよくないが, 言葉足らずもよくない. In personal relationships it is no good saying too much, but it is no good 「saying too little [being tongue-tied, suppressing what you want to say], either.
Eijiro: lack of talk
JMdict: 意余って言葉足らず （いあまってことばたらず） (exp) unable to find adequate words (e.g. to express feelings); being at a loss for words
Google n-grams:
言葉足らず	102959
ことば足らず	1277
言葉たらず	2952

I fully support Rene's response. If you can't find a reference, at least provide some samples of sentences where it's being used, accompanied by plausible translations. Just saying "many many hits on google" is tossing the whole task to others.

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>言葉たらず</keb>
@@ -14 +17 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
@@ -16 +19,2 @@
-<gloss>lack of clarity (because unsufficient instruction, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>being tongue-tied</gloss>
+<gloss>suppressing what you want to say</gloss>

if you don't want to put in the minimum effort to supply a reference, why are you making a submission?  the reference box exists for a reason

but you have tools at your disposal to look it up, e.g. the ngrams, etc. and 
you supposedly have access to lots of dictionaries not freely available 
online. if you don't want to even make the minimum effort to confirm an entry 
submitted in good faith, why are you an editor in the first place?

I stand corrected. Your Google-fu is much stronger than mine :). Must be a newer term, as it wasn't in my 
macOS OED or turning up with `define "golden egg" -goose`.

https://www.lexico.com/definition/golden_egg
"A source of continual or guaranteed success, 
profit, or wealth."
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2009-
02-03/for-pawnshops-the-recession-is-a-golden-
egg
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/amp/opinion/mo
ckingbirds-sequel-is-a-golden-egg-for-a-
desperate-publishing-industry/article22849491/
http://wach.com/news/local/house-of-raeford-
chicken-plant-is-a-golden-egg-for-west-
columbia
https://www.nytimes.com/2003/02/23/nyregion/li
-work-biotech-golden-egg-or-wrong-basket.html
https://www.nytimes.com/1997/12/12/sports/tv-
sports-nfl-s-golden-egg-ready-to-bulge.html
http://knoxblogs.com/atomiccity/2010/06/27/thi
s_is_a_golden_egg_for_oak_r/

@@ -21,0 +22 @@
+<gloss>golden egg</gloss>

"Golden egg" doesn't have this meaning. It _is_ part of the phrase "kill the goose that lays the golden egg", 
but that's referring to literal golden eggs in that story.

@@ -22 +21,0 @@
-<gloss>golden egg</gloss>

This is pretty much obvious from n-suf

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<s_inf>in noun compounds</s_inf>

I think we can drop [n].

@@ -8 +7,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>

Not in references, but obviously valid. Seems always to be a suffix.

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
@@ -9,0 +11 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2112490">筋トレ</xref>
@@ -13,0 +16 @@
+<gloss>workout</gloss>

see: 筋トレ (muscle building)、チントレ (penis practice)、チャリトレ (bicycle practice)、脳トレ (brain practice)

Looks good.

Trying to make the glosses less context-specific.

@@ -12,3 +12,5 @@
-<gloss>there's no telling (what sort of ...)</gloss>
-<gloss>it's anybody's guess</gloss>
-<gloss>who knows what might happen</gloss>
+<misc>&col;</misc>
+<gloss>there's no knowing</gloss>
+<gloss>there's no telling</gloss>
+<gloss>it's anyone's guess</gloss>
+<gloss>who knows?</gloss>

言うもんじゃない	13399

I feel this is worth letting through. もんじゃない/ものじゃない is very common, but its meaning depends on the context. In cases like 言うもんじゃない is means "shouldn't". The meaning of this construction isn't obvious (to me at least.)

分かったもんじゃない	9217
知ったもんじゃない	183
言ったもんじゃない	39
聞いたもんじゃない	No matches

分かったもんじゃない certainly stands out as a common use of the ～もんじゃない.

Feels too compositional to me. もんじゃない/ものじゃない can appear after all sorts of verbs.

I didn't propose a merge as the alignment with the kanji forms was messy and this is osb. I thought it better to keep them apart.

@@ -11,0 +12,2 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>

なんもかんも	10639
なんもかも	3475
なにもかも	213039 (already an entry)

Should this really be a separate entry from なにもかも?

https://www.weblio.jp/content/なんもかんも

GG5, 理化学英和辞典, 医学英和辞典
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Threose

GG5. Eijiro. N-grams: 339

GG5
取れ過ぎ	910

gg5, daij
gakken: 文章語
堵列	486

@@ -12,0 +13,2 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<misc>&form;</misc>
@@ -13,0 +16,2 @@
+<gloss>forming a row</gloss>
+<gloss>lining up (side by side)</gloss>

Daijr, GG5

GG5, Kagaku, Kenchiku
トレッスル	2563

Daijr: "【イタリア treviso】"
GG5: 〔イタリア原産のキク科の野菜〕 trevise.

Yes, very confusing. GG5's gloss - trevise - seems not to be an English word at all.

https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radicchio
https://www.italianfoodexcellence.com/the-radicchio-family/
https://fr.wiktionary.org/wiki/trévise
https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radicchio

this one is slightly confusing.  the japanese term comes from the french name (Trévise) for an italian city (Treviso) made into a common noun (trévise).

there is a protected geographical indication for a kind of radicchio from the Treviso region, which is called "Radicchio Rosso di Treviso"; however, this type of radicchio has a very distinctive shape, and a google image search for トレビス suggests that トレビス (and  トレヴィス) is being used to refer indiscriminately to all kinds of radicchio (red chicory), and daijr simply says "赤芽チコリとも。"  

on the other hand, if you search for トレビーゾ, you will get definite image matches for the cultivar called "Radicchio Rosso di Treviso"

the french wiktionary link also suggests that trévise means "radicchio", and the french wikipedia page for radicchio says that radicchio is sometimes *incorrectly* called "trévise" in french.

"treviso" and "trevise" don't seem to get much play outside of "Radicchio Rosso di Treviso"

so i think the best gloss for this is simply "radicchio"

in summary:
トレビス = radicchio (from the incorrect french name "trévise" for radicchio)
トレビーゾ = "Radicchio Rosso di Treviso" (a protected name for a cultivar of radicchio from the italian place of origin Treviso)

@@ -12,3 +12,2 @@
-<lsource xml:lang="ita"/>
-<gloss>treviso (Cichorium intybus var. foliosum)</gloss>
-<gloss>trevise</gloss>
+<lsource xml:lang="fre">trévise</lsource>
+<gloss>radicchio (Cichorium intybus var. foliosum)</gloss>

Daijr, GG5, ＫＯＤ追加語彙
トレビス	5442
トレヴィス	1108

GG5
トレンチャー	1325

I'd floated a "辛いもの" entry, but it's really a step too far. I'm dropping it and putting in a note instead.

@@ -16,2 +16 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2841726">辛いもの・からいもの</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2841726">辛いもの・からいもの</xref>
+<s_inf>usu. 辛いもの, etc.</s_inf>

my reading of the ref is that からもん is for sense 2 only, although it wouldn't be surprising if it actually applied to both

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<stagr>からもの</stagr>

辛い物	66176
辛いもの	446700
辛物	395
GG5: 本場のカレーにはとても辛いものがある. Authentic (Indian) curries can be really hot.
ひどく辛いものや油っこいものは胃によくありません. Very 「spicy [hot] or oily foods are not good for the stomach.

We've got to have the more common form(s). I'll make a い物 and xref this to it.

@@ -9,0 +10,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>からもん</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -12 +15,2 @@
-<s_inf>more often as 辛い物</s_inf>
+<xref type="see" seq="2841726">辛いもの・からいもの</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2841726">辛いもの・からいもの</xref>
@@ -17 +21,4 @@
-<gloss>daikon (variety of radish)</gloss>
+<misc>&arch;</misc>
+<misc>&fem;</misc>
+<s_inf>secret language of court ladies</s_inf>
+<gloss>daikon</gloss>

日本国語大辞典 https://kotobank.jp/word/辛物-1763944

G n-grams:

まあいいか 219,647 58.5%
まいっか　  49,786 13.3%
まあいっか  42,002 11.2%
まっいいか  37,341  9.9% <- adding
まっいっか  25,768  6.9% <- adding
まいいっか     903  0.2% <- [sk]
まぁいっか  No matches   <- [sk]

@@ -13,0 +14,6 @@
+<reb>まっいいか</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>まっいっか</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -14,0 +21 @@
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
@@ -17,0 +25 @@
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

Looks good.

Less context-specific glosses.

@@ -21,2 +21,5 @@
-<gloss>oh well, I'll take it then</gloss>
-<gloss>I guess it's OK</gloss>
+<misc>&col;</misc>
+<gloss>oh well, fine</gloss>
+<gloss>fine, I guess</gloss>
+<gloss>alright, I suppose</gloss>
+<gloss>OK, then</gloss>

This has been sitting here for a month. I'll approve it and if anyone wants to discuss it, it can be reopened.

Thanks

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<pos>&v5r;</pos>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>

の理解を得る	46360 <- GG5 draws attention to this pattern - 住民の理解を得る gain the understanding of residents
理解を得る	87305

Well, they're harmless and given that they occur fairly often I think they're useful to confirm that an expression is recognized and in use. I've often put together what I thought was a usable phrase/clause/whatever in Japanese or French and been told: "well, you *could* possibly say that but we're more likely to say ....".  It's good to be able to check the pattern.
I'm inclined to keep this and the others.

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<s_inf>often 〜の理解を得る</s_inf>

yeah, we could probably do without a bunch of them

Personally, I don't think we need this or any of those other 理解を〜 expressions. They're all literal and rather obvious.

Yes, I think it's a step too far, and ignores that 辛いもの can mean more than that. I'll just add a note to the new 辛物 entry.

I don't think this is needed.

辛い物	66176
辛いもの	446700
辛物	395
GG5: 本場のカレーにはとても辛いものがある. Authentic (Indian) curries can be really hot.
ひどく辛いものや油っこいものは胃によくありません. Very 「spicy [hot] or oily foods are not good for the stomach.

Built from 辛物 (2841723). Maybe a little obvious, but useful in association with 辛物.

i think it's basically fine.  this is slightly more concise

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>imposition of a punishment</gloss>
+<gloss>imposing a punishment</gloss>

koj, daijr, daijs, nikk: https://kotobank.jp/word/科刑-461016
Found in the Constitution of Japan

Don't know how to word this in English...

Oops

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>トトレチャコフ</reb>
+<reb>トレチャコフ</reb>

GG5

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>トトレチャコフ</reb>

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<misc>&unclass;</misc>
+<misc>&dei;</misc>

Yes, we should.
We can clean these up later by searching for "deity".

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<gloss>Nigihayahi no Mikoto</gloss>
+<gloss>Nigihayahi no Mikoto (Shinto deity)</gloss>

https://ejje.weblio.jp/content/饒速日命
digital daijisen https://kotobank.jp/word/饒速日命-591173
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/ニギハヤヒ

I feel like we really could do with a tag for names related to myth/religion