@@ -22 +22 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1755120">山の手・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1755120">山の手・2</xref>

@@ -23 +23 @@
-<gloss>Shitamachi (low-lying area of eastern Tokyo near Tokyo Bay, inc. Asakusa, Shitaya, Kanda, Fukugawa, Honjo, Nihonbashi, Kyobashi and surrounds)</gloss>
+<gloss>Shitamachi (low-lying area of eastern Tokyo near Tokyo Bay, incl. Asakusa, Shitaya, Kanda, Fukugawa, Honjo, Nihonbashi, Kyobashi and surrounds)</gloss>

@@ -18,0 +18,4 @@
+<gloss>low-lying part of a city (usu. containing shops, factories, etc.)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -19,1 +23,0 @@
-<gloss>low-lying part of a city (usu. containing shops, factories, etc.)</gloss>

I guess this is OK. These days Tokyo's Shitamachi is regarded as bigger than that.

Not my favourite word.

@@ -21,2 +21,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1658020">山手・やまて・2</xref>
-<gloss>hilly section of a city (usu. residential)</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1658020">山手・2</xref>
+<gloss>hilly section of a city (usu. upscale residential)</gloss>

I see the したまち entry is split this way.

@@ -19,0 +20,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1185940">下町・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1658020">山手・やまて・2</xref>
@@ -24,2 +26 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1185940">下町・1</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1658020">山手・やまて</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1185940">下町・したまち・2</xref>

@@ -19,0 +20,4 @@
+<gloss>hilly section of a city (usu. residential)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -22 +25,0 @@
-<gloss>hilly section of a city (usu. residential)</gloss>

@@ -23 +23 @@
-<gloss>Yamanote (hilly residential section of western Tokyo, inc. Yotsuya, Aoyama, Koishikawa, Hongo, Ichigaya, Akasaka, Azabu and surrounds)</gloss>
+<gloss>Yamanote (hilly residential section of western Tokyo, incl. Yotsuya, Aoyama, Koishikawa, Hongo, Ichigaya, Akasaka, Azabu and surrounds)</gloss>

@@ -15 +15,2 @@
-<gloss>uncalled-for or impertinent remark</gloss>
+<gloss>uncalled-for remark</gloss>
+<gloss>impertinent remark</gloss>

daijs
Google n-grams:
差し出口	1657
差出口	533

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>差出口</keb>

OK

In a grammatically correct sentence, this is always 〜を抜きにして or 〜は抜きにして. I think we need to add the を here. It feels incomplete without it.
However, with the updated 抜き entry, I'm not sure this entry is even needed.

http://jlptdictionary.com/viewentry.php?intEntryID=189 which in turn cites 日本語表現文型辞典, p. 429

Essentially same meaning, but useful in more kinds of sentences

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<gloss>without</gloss>

Entry created

Fork. Someone made the edit before you.

Syncing.

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss>Wamyoruijusho (famous Heian-period Japanese dictionary)</gloss>
+<gloss>Wamyōruijushō (famous Heian-period Japanese dictionary)</gloss>

Daijr, Koj (merge).

Merging 2094010.

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>倭名鈔</keb>
@@ -11,0 +15 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2094020">倭名類聚鈔・わみょうるいじゅしょう</xref>

Entry created

Sigh.

"Names of dictionaries" isn't mentioned in that list, so this should really be 
in the names dictionary according to policy.

Weird? I don't think so. We try and keep to a consistent subset of proper names with the rest being in JMnedict/Enamdict. It would be silly to exclude all proper names, and a mess if we put in all 740,000 from JMnedict/Enamdict. The broad guidelines for enclusion are at http://www.edrdg.org/wiki/index.php/Editorial_policy#Proper_Names

... but Daijirin has hundreds if not thousands of proper names in the 
dictionary. out of those thousands, jmdict has cherrypicked Japanese cities, 
foreign capitals, a handful of super famous people like Mozart, and... 
historical dictionaries? Isn't it a rather weird subset?

大辞林:  わみょうしょう 【和名抄・倭名鈔】
「倭名類聚鈔わみようるいじゆしよう」の略。
広辞苑 ditto.

We have good company for our silliness.

キジルシ	654

@@ -21,0 +22,4 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>キジルシ</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>
+</r_ele>

Sorry, I didn't notice this had been closed/reopened.

koj says the き in き印 is the same as the き in きちがう
ngrams
  キ印	9352
  気印	224
  き印	218

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>気印</keb>
@@ -15,0 +19 @@
+<re_restr>気印</re_restr>

G n-grams:
キ印	9352
き印	218
きじるし	1365
キじるし	149

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>キ印</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -7,0 +11,4 @@
+<reb>キじるし</reb>
+<re_restr>キ印</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -8,0 +16 @@
+<re_restr>き印</re_restr>
@@ -12,2 +20,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1221900">気違い</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1221900">気違い</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1221900">気違い・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1221900">気違い・1</xref>

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1755120">山の手・2</xref>
@@ -13,2 +14 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1755120">山の手・2</xref>
-<gloss>the refined speech of the uptown residents of Tokyo</gloss>
+<gloss>refined speech of the uptown residents of Tokyo</gloss>

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1755120">山の手・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1755120">山の手・2</xref>

@@ -15,1 +15,1 @@
-<gloss>the refined speech of the uptown residents Tokyo</gloss>
+<gloss>the refined speech of the uptown residents of Tokyo</gloss>

pretty sure the xref is pointing at the wrong thing

@@ -12,1 +12,1 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1185940">下町</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1718880">下町言葉</xref>

Trimming a little.

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<s_inf>spoken representation of ellipses (...); usu. denotes silence</s_inf>
+<s_inf>spoken version of ellipses (...); usu. denotes silence</s_inf>

Trying to add more detail. "from ..." might be confusing to some.
I don't think uk is necessary given that it's spoken.
I'd go with int over exp.

@@ -11,2 +11 @@
-<pos>&exp;</pos>
-<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<pos>&int;</pos>
@@ -15 +14 @@
-<s_inf>spoken language; from …</s_inf>
+<s_inf>spoken representation of ellipses (...); usu. denotes silence</s_inf>

https://en.m.wiktionary.org/wiki/dot_dot_d
ot

@@ -15,2 +15,2 @@
-<s_inf>from ・・・</s_inf>
-<gloss>silence</gloss>
+<s_inf>spoken language; from …</s_inf>
+<gloss>dot dot dot</gloss>

the 由 form does not appear in the による entry

に依らず	7331
によらず	207814
に因らず	1314
に拠らず	3669
に由らず	482

I encountered に因らず in the wild, so we'd better add the other forms.

@@ -5,0 +6,9 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>に拠らず</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>に因らず</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>に由らず</keb>

GG5, Eijiro (examples) G n-grams:
に依らず	7331
によらず	207814

We have quite a few of these による derivatives.

I just want to note that the "(カタカナ発音)" entries in Eijiro are simply katakana transcriptions of English words. They're not translations.

チョコボ	391262

チョコボ is a useful comparison. It's (correctly) an entry in JMnedict, and very common. However, there's no way it would be mistaken as a gairaigo derived from a common English verb.
Anyway I'll drop it. If someone comes across it and is not into games terminology they're on their own.

I don't think "overpower" is misleading/wrong as that's the etymology. I agree with Robin that this shouldn't be an entry. I'm sure many 
Final Fantasy terms like "chocobo" for example will get way more than 5k hits in the ngrams but they still don't have a place in jmdict.

As I wrote initially: "Just need to flag that it doesn't seem to be "overpower" in its usual English sense."
Given that it gets over 5k in the n-grams, and that Eijiro has "オーバーパワー〔カタカナ発音〕 : overpower" which is misleading and probably wrong, I think it's useful to have some entry to counter that. The FF dictionary has "斧術士のアクション。" which isn't a lot of use - we don't have an entry for 斧術士 (22 n-gram count.)

I was implying that it shouldn't be an entry if it's only used in the way I described. It's appears to be a name that refers to different things in different games; therefore it's not possible to define. It's very common in Japanese video games to make up names for things by combing common English words. They're not worth recording unless they're generic terms.

@@ -11,2 +11 @@
-<gloss>rumtopf</gloss>
-<gloss g_type="expl">fruit preserved in rum and sugar</gloss>
+<gloss>rumtopf (fruit preserved in rum and sugar)</gloss>

English vs German capitalization rules.

@@ -10,2 +10,2 @@
-<lsource xml:lang="ger"/>
-<gloss>Rumtopf</gloss>
+<lsource xml:lang="ger">Rumtopf</lsource>
+<gloss>rumtopf</gloss>

ルムトプフ - 69 Googits, ラムトプフ - 9 Googits.

I'd prefer to keep it with an "ik" tag, but I'm not fussed.

On twitter, there's plenty of hits for ルムトプフ, but only 3 tweets in total (i.e. since the advent of twitter) for ラムトプフ.

@@ -6,3 +5,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>ラムトプフ</reb>

Tsk, tsk. I should have noticed that - I saw the "ger", but not its misconstruction.

Daijr

Try and avoid hyphens in romanizations.

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1182060">黄身・きみ</xref>
@@ -16,2 +17,2 @@
-<gloss>kimi-zushi</gloss>
-<gloss g_type="expl">sushi in which fried egg yolk is used instead of rice</gloss>
+<gloss>kimizushi</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">sushi with egg yolk instead of rice</gloss>

weblio reibun https://ejje.weblio.jp/content/黄身鮨
daijirin etc https://kotobank.jp/word/黄身鮨-475748
http://wasyokunowa.tokyo/2015/05/06/みょうが寿司　黄身酢し　山芋寿司　三種類の/

hard to say.  seems more like an example sentence than an entry

どうでしょうか	1932066

I really wonder about this. Sure it's common, but so are many others (なんですか: 5183824). It's どう + でしょうか, both of which are entries. We'd normally only include something like this if it had an idiomatic meaning, and this one doesn't.

Forgot to mention, but this is also used as a more polite way of questioning something someone else had said

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<gloss>(I) doubt it</gloss>

weblio https://ejje.weblio.jp/content/どうでしょうか

Should be common enough to be useful

That seems to be the case.

koj, nikk

Mostly used in Korea-related texts

I agree. I don't see a need for it.

助けを求める	117768
78 Tanaka sentences, several examples in GG5.

Maybe this is a bit obvious to include. Not in the slightest idiomatic.

https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=助けを求める

Indeed. I don't think we need it.

意外	6843509
意外に	3171457
意外にも	604430

Isn't this just も added to 意外に to give it a bit of emphasis? You see XXにも all the time - it's a language usage rather than a term to go in a dictionary, IMO.

https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=意外にも
https://ejje.weblio.jp/sentence/content/"意外にも"

ＫＯＤ追加語彙 has this as an entry, xref to ジグザグ航行
之字運動	286
ジグザグ航行	237

之字 by itself seems not to get much use. I found a reference to climbing Fuji on a "之字路".

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>zig-zag motion</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2841773">ジグザグ航行</xref>
+<gloss>zig-zag motion (esp. warship)</gloss>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/之字運動

Encountered while translating Kanpeki no Kantai, volume 1, page 108.  With reference to the motion of ships in wartime when trying to evade enemy fire.

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2841774">何事によらず</xref>

Nikkoku: 事物・事態を選択しないさま。どんなものでもよい、何であろうと。何には依るまい。
https://japanese.stackexchange.com/questions/27642/meaning-of-何によらず
何に依らず	43
何によらず	1430
なにによらず	172
Tanaka: 人前で話すようなことは何によらず彼はいつも敬遠する。 He tends to shy away from anything that involves public speaking.

Came up in the context of the quoted Tanaka sentence pair. Doesn't seem to fit the usual によらず meaning.

GG5 (ジグザグ entry)
之字運動	286
ジグザグ航行	237

何事に依らず	113
何事に拠らず	23

@@ -5,0 +6,6 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>何事に依らず</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>何事に拠らず</keb>

GG5
何事によらず	3802
https://japanese.stackexchange.com/questions/27642/meaning-of-何によらず  (one comment was "何事によらず means the same, and is more common, according to BCCWJ Corpus.")

Adding spec1
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/ディオニュソス譚
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dionysiaca