I guess it works.

Better? The lsrc would normally be on the first sense

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<lsource xml:lang="fre">nouvelle</lsource>
@@ -17,2 +17,0 @@
-<lsource xml:lang="fre">nouvelle</lsource>
-<gloss>nouvelle</gloss>

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<lsource xml:lang="fre"/>
+<lsource xml:lang="fre">nouvelle</lsource>

daijs

@@ -11,0 +12,4 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>mid-length novel</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>

Moving lsrc tag to first sense.

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<lsource xml:lang="fre">roman</lsource>
@@ -25 +25,0 @@
-<lsource xml:lang="fre">roman</lsource>
@@ -37 +37 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1560810">ロマン主義・ロマンしゅぎ</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1560810">ロマン主義</xref>

We could add "state of being romantic", but it's hardly needed.

I meant romanticism as in "the state or 
quality of being romantic."

Romance and romanticism are not the same thing and should be in separate senses.

@@ -32,0 +33,5 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1148000">ロマンチシズム</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1560810">ロマン主義・ロマンしゅぎ</xref>

Here's my go at it. I reinstated "Arthurian romance" for sense 1, as it's a good match of what's in daij. I changed the order of the other 
senses based on twitter recent hits and Google Images. 

sense 2 is GG5's ③, daijr ③, nikk ③. I got the "great undertaking" and "epic adventure" from daijr's definition.

@@ -13,3 +13,2 @@
-<lsource xml:lang="fre">roman</lsource>
-<gloss>novel</gloss>
-<gloss>roman</gloss>
+<gloss>romance (e.g. Arthurian romances)</gloss>
+<gloss>heroic tale</gloss>
@@ -19,2 +18,9 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1147950">ロマンス・1</xref>
-<gloss>romance (film, novel)</gloss>
+<gloss>(nigh) impossible dream</gloss>
+<gloss>adventurous spirit</gloss>
+<gloss>great undertaking</gloss>
+<gloss>epic adventure</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<lsource xml:lang="fre">roman</lsource>
+<gloss>(full-length) novel</gloss>
@@ -27,6 +33 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>adventurous spirit</gloss>
-<gloss>impossible dream</gloss>
-<gloss>great ambition</gloss>
+<gloss>romanticism</gloss>

No further comments.

Reopen.

I'll lock this edit it, and reopen if anyone wants to discuss it further. I'll also be closing off 2837807 and deleting 2454360 (何とかして) as this edit effectively merges it here.

@@ -26,0 +27 @@
+<s_inf>handling, dealing with</s_inf>

See discussion on (possibly deleted) 2837807. I'm proposing to add "vs" to sense 2 to cover the very common 何とかして/なんとかして and cancel that entry (2454360).
Alternatively a third "vs" sense could be added here.

@@ -24,0 +25 @@
+<pos>&vs;</pos>

daij, meikyo

not a noun

@@ -18,2 +17,0 @@
-<pos>&adv;</pos>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -26 +23,0 @@
-<pos>&exp;</pos>
@@ -28 +24,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>

daij, koj
五体	99913
五體	184

As Rene said, it's confusing to have so many x-refs. We'd need 10 to be complete. I think it's better to have none.
I think we can drop 五體. It's not in the refs.
I think it's worth having a sense that reflects the original definition.

@@ -10,3 +9,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>五體</keb>
-</k_ele>
@@ -20 +16,0 @@
-<stagk>五体</stagk>
@@ -23 +18,0 @@
-<gloss>limbs</gloss>
@@ -27,10 +22,6 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1281960">行書</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1883930">真書</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1883930">真書・1</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1402000">草書</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2148970">大篆</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2038580">八分・はっぷん・2</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1628220">隷書</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1568280">楷書</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1570300">篆書</xref>
-<gloss>the five styles in Japanese calligraphy</gloss>
+<gloss>the five styles of writing Chinese characters</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<s_inf>orig. meaning</s_inf>
+<gloss>the five parts of the body (head, two hands and two feet; or head, neck, chest, hands and feet)</gloss>

the xrefs should probably just be dropped.  since there are more than five here, it's quite confusing

dropping xref to 書道
tightening xref to 八分

@@ -28 +27,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1344130">書道</xref>
@@ -32 +31 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2038580">八分・はっぷん</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2038580">八分・はっぷん・2</xref>

It's usually ~に/で, so a noun gloss it tricky. I'd like at least one gloss without "(in)".
Although very marginal, having that 人まえ version is harmless.

@@ -8,0 +9,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>人まえ</keb>
@@ -17,0 +21 @@
+<gloss>presence of other people</gloss>
@@ -19 +22,0 @@
-<gloss>(in) the company of other people</gloss>

人前	2392803
人まえ	1265
~1:2000

@@ -9,3 +8,0 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>人まえ</keb>

gg5 koj daijs

clearer

@@ -21,2 +21,3 @@
-<gloss>the public</gloss>
-<gloss>company</gloss>
+<gloss>(in) public</gloss>
+<gloss>(in) the company of other people</gloss>
+<gloss>(in) front of others</gloss>

@@ -8,0 +9,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>人まえ</keb>

[vt,vi]: meikyo, sankoku, obunsha
[vt]: shinmeikai, iwakoku

@@ -16,0 +17,2 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -21,0 +24,2 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

gg5, daij

I think it's clearer to have two senses here, as in daijs.

@@ -17 +17,6 @@
-<gloss>soil preparation</gloss>
+<gloss>levelling of ground (for construction)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<gloss>preparation of soil (for planting)</gloss>

OK. Let's stick to that.

I think "kanji" is fine when the term relates specifically to Japanese but 楷書 doesn't so I prefer "Chinese characters" here.

Some of the entries related to calligraphy refer to "Chinese characters" and others to "kanji". Can we settle on one or the other? I prefer "kanji" in the context of explaining Japanese terms, but I'm not fussed if we use the other.

Aligning.

@@ -18,3 +18,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2524060">楷書体</xref>
-<gloss>square style of handwriting</gloss>
-<gloss>printed style of handwriting</gloss>
+<gloss>printed style (of writing Chinese characters)</gloss>
+<gloss>square style</gloss>

daij/koj: "古くは「ぶんじょ」とも"

@@ -18,0 +19,4 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ぶんじょ</reb>
+<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>
@@ -24,2 +28,2 @@
-<gloss>paperwork</gloss>
-<gloss>note</gloss>
+<gloss>papers</gloss>
+<gloss>notes</gloss>
@@ -32 +36,2 @@
-<gloss>document addressed to someone in particular (jargon used in paleography)</gloss>
+<s_inf>paleography term</s_inf>
+<gloss>document addressed to someone</gloss>

GG5 has もんじょ meaning "old historical documents", but I'm not sure it's correct. I suspect they are influenced by 文書館.

daij wiki

@@ -29,0 +29,5 @@
+<sense>
+<stagr>もんじょ</stagr>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>document addressed to someone in particular (jargon used in paleography)</gloss>
+</sense>

@@ -12,2 +12,2 @@
-<field>&sports;</field>
-<gloss>downhill (alpine skiing event)</gloss>
+<field>&ski;</field>
+<gloss>downhill</gloss>

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&sports;</field>

gg5
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Downhill_(ski_competition)

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>downhill racing (skiing)</gloss>
+<gloss>downhill (alpine skiing event)</gloss>
+<gloss>downhill race</gloss>

Might not be obvious to everyone.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>downhill racing</gloss>
+<gloss>downhill racing (skiing)</gloss>

Fork

Daijr.

Clearer. There's an xref to 楷書 so no need to say it again.

@@ -13,2 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>square style</gloss>
-<gloss>another name for "kaisho"</gloss>
+<gloss>square style of writing kanji</gloss>
+<gloss>block style</gloss>

OK

I think 行書 and 草書 should have been aligned with this, rather than the other way round.
It was decided in the comments of 楷書 (1568280) to use "Chinese characters" instead of "kanji".

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>printed style of kanji</gloss>
+<gloss>printed style (of writing Chinese characters)</gloss>

Aligning with the 行書 and 草書 entries.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>printed style (of writing Chinese characters)</gloss>
+<gloss>printed style of kanji</gloss>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Hebrew</gloss>
+<gloss>Hebrew (language)</gloss>

Time to close it.

Reopen, but not for long.

This has been around too long. I'm aligning the POS with 2756750 and closing. I'll  reopen for a bit if anyone wants to tackle a split/merge.

@@ -39,0 +40,2 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>

Can you set up that split and the ボッコボコ merge? I find it hard with just a tablet.

daij

I think ぽこぽこ should be split out (and ぼっこぼこ brought back in). ぼこぼこ and ぽこぽこ only partially overlap, and the meaning is 
not identical. daijr: " ぼこぼこ 一 ① よりも、軽い感じを表す語。"

@@ -20 +20 @@
-<gloss>burbling</gloss>
+<gloss>with a burble</gloss>

https://yoji.jitenon.jp/cat/search.php?getdata=準備万端+&search=contain

I check against that site. Kanji Haitani went a bit overboard with his list, IMHO.

https://kokugoryokuup.com/zyunnbibanntann/
「準備万端」という四字熟語があります。

This blog about yoji has an entry:
http://erohaa.blog66.fc2.com/blog-entry-470.html

I'm not certain what criteria need to be met for an expression to be
considered yoji. Is there a reason why the tag was removed?

GG5, 中辞典

https://www.weblio.jp/content/準備万端

@@ -11,5 +11,3 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<misc>&yoji;</misc>
-<gloss>every preparation (arrangement)</gloss>
-<gloss>all sorts of preparations</gloss>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<gloss>fully prepared</gloss>
+<gloss>all ready</gloss>

Kanji Haitani list

Adding yoji tagAdding yoji tag
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<misc>&yoji;</misc>

Locking this in for now.

I've proposed a "vs" to be added to sense 2 of the 何とか entry, and the deletion of this one if that is approved.

probably [uk] like the other なんとか entries; k/m n-grams are not enough.

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

Entry created

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>study of historial documents</gloss>
+<gloss>study of historical documents</gloss>

daijr: 古文書の様式・材料・署名・花押・印章・書風・用語・文体などを分析して，文書の真偽を鑑定し，体系化したり，またその内容から文書授受者の関係やその歴史的背景を研究する学問。
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/古書体学
"欧米には日本語でいう「古文書学」に正確に対応する学問概念がなく、欧米では「文書形式学」や「古書体学」として細分化して認識されている。"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diplomatics
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palaeography

古文書学 covers a lot more than palaeography.

@@ -11,0 +12,3 @@
+<gloss>study of historial documents</gloss>
+<gloss>diplomatics</gloss>
+<gloss>diplomatic</gloss>

OK

https://ameblo.jp/michaelgabrielraphael/entry-12155651509.html
https://gendai.ismedia.jp/articles/-/40576?page=2
https://p-shirokuma.hatenadiary.com/entry/20060720/p3
G n-grams:
ボッコボコ	34585
ボッコボコに	23652
ボッコボコが	No matches
ボッコボコを	31

I don't think this is a noun or vs. It's almost always in the form ボッコボコにする (or される, etc.). In daijs's ぼこぼこ entry, this sense is 形動.
I've added a second sense. I see this usage quite a lot.

@@ -11,2 +10,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<pos>&vs;</pos>
@@ -15,3 +13,12 @@
-<s_inf>emphatic form of ぼこぼこ</s_inf>
-<gloss>viciously beating</gloss>
-<gloss>hitting and kicking repeatedly</gloss>
+<misc>&col;</misc>
+<s_inf>usu. as ボッコボコにする, ボッコボコにされる, etc.; emphatic form of ぼこぼこ</s_inf>
+<gloss>severely beaten up</gloss>
+<gloss>repeatedly punched and kicked</gloss>
+<gloss>thoroughly defeated</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
+<misc>&col;</misc>
+<gloss>attacked relentlessly (with words)</gloss>
+<gloss>fiercely criticised</gloss>
+<gloss>bombarded with verbal abuse</gloss>

This has been around too long. I'm aligning the POS with sense 4 of 1983930 and closing. I'll leave 1983930 open for a bit if anyone wants to tackle a split/merge.

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>

tough to say.  right now, it shouldn't be merged because the PoS is different, but there's no reference for the PoS

Are we sure this should be kept separate from the main ぼこぼこ entry?

Daijr, GG5

Correct. Thanks.

広辞苑、第四版  
https://www.weblio.jp/content/墓域  
https://dic.yahoo.co.jp/search/?p=墓域&stype=full&aq=-1&oq=&ei=UTF-8

reading should be ぼいき; the current reading ばいき is probably a typo.

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>ばいき</reb>
+<reb>ぼいき</reb>

GG5

@@ -13,0 +13,1 @@
+<gloss>land set aside for burial</gloss>

daij nikk

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1419390">弾み・はずみ・2</xref>

GG5 (弾み entry)

daijs, eij, prog

I'm not pushing this one at this stage - it's really very marginal.

辞官	1031	 
辞官し	58
辞官落飾	49	  
辞官と	31	  
辞官隠居	31

辞官納地 accounts for about 60% of usage, but there seem to be enough other examples to make 
it worth recording.

From what I can tell, 辞官 (virtually) always appears as part of 辞官納地 (i.e. it was created for that expression).
Considering that it's in none of the dictionaries, I don't think we can say that 辞官 itself is a word.

辞官	1031
https://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q10159946830
"辞官とは官位を返上すること"
Unidic - has it as a morpheme.

An entry has gone in for the historical compound 辞官納地, so this component should be 
covered.

Locking this in for now.

I suggest this and the なんとかして entry be rolled into sense 2 of 何とか, with "vs" added.

なんとか is marked vs in daijs so this does 
perhaps not need to be its own entry. We 
do have なんとかして separate from なんとか 
thougg. And also a なんとかなる entry.

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>何とかする</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -8,2 +11,4 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>to manage to</gloss>
+<pos>&vs-i;</pos>
+<gloss>to (somehow) handle (something)</gloss>
+<gloss>to deal with</gloss>
+<gloss>to manage</gloss>

https://ejje.weblio.jp/content/なんとかする

ＫＯＤ追加語彙
トランスミュージック	2509
トランスパーティー	689

ＫＯＤ追加語彙
トランスミュージック	2509
トランスパーティー	689
トランスパーティ	230

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 浪漫　　 │ 749,772 │ 99.7% │
│ 浪曼　　 │     928 │  0.1% │ - rK (daijr, gg5)
│ ろうまん │   1,089 │  0.1% │
╰─ーーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

I'm moving the lsrc tag to the first sense. It will become entry-wide eventually.

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<lsource xml:lang="fre">roman</lsource>
@@ -30 +30,0 @@
-<lsource xml:lang="fre">roman</lsource>

Not a problem. I kept it small because it's quite rare, but synchronisation is fine.

We should probably align this with the ロマン entry.
I don't think the note is necessary when there are ateji tags in the kanji field.

@@ -18,5 +18,26 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1147940">ロマン・2</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1147940">ロマン・3</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1147940">ロマン・4</xref>
-<s_inf>ateji form of ロマン, ローマン</s_inf>
-<gloss>romance, etc.</gloss>
+<gloss>romance (e.g. Arthurian romances)</gloss>
+<gloss>heroic tale</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>(nigh) impossible dream</gloss>
+<gloss>adventurous spirit</gloss>
+<gloss>great undertaking</gloss>
+<gloss>epic adventure</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<lsource xml:lang="fre">roman</lsource>
+<gloss>(full-length) novel</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1147950">ロマンス・2</xref>
+<gloss>romance</gloss>
+<gloss>love affair</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1148000">ロマンチシズム</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1560810">ロマン主義</xref>
+<gloss>romanticism</gloss>

yeah, i think we can do without this.  otoh it is in eijiro, but it seems pretty obvious from 思いやられる

先が思いやられる	53932
思いやられる	79161

This used to be an entry (2221010), and two years ago it was trimmed back to 思いやられる. Do we really want to go back to it?

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2221010">思いやられる・おもいやられる</xref>

https://ja.glosbe.com/ja/en/先が思いやられる

Daijr, GG5, etc.

@@ -12 +12,8 @@
-<gloss>spoiled person</gloss>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<gloss>overreliance on others</gloss>
+<gloss>excessive babyishness</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1790040">甘えん坊・あまえんぼう</xref>
+<gloss>spoiled person (esp. child)</gloss>

https://kotobank.jp/word/甘ったれ-427064

この寺は八文字屋本で有名な自笑一族の墓のあるところ、かつて掃苔したときとは、五条通の拡張工事で、趣きも変わっていた。(off-line article)

萩市の徳隣寺で林三介、海潮寺で長井雅楽、保福寺で金子重輔、長寿寺で入江九一と河上彌市を
掃苔しました。... そしてこの度ようやく掃苔することができました。
https://blog.goo.ne.jp/bakumatsusotaiya/e/c2cfd7710457aa790771dfe75f5c80cf

まさに光陰矢の如しであるが、その間、掃苔した箇所は恐らく400を優に超えていよう。
http://souryuanzuisou.blog.fc2.com/blog-entry-840.html

智積院を掃苔した方、いないでしょうか。
https://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q14106488119

also vs

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
@@ -15,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&vs;</pos>

Daijr, ＫＯＤ追加語彙

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>visit a grave (especially during the Bon festival)</gloss>
+<gloss>visit to a family grave (esp. during the Bon festival)</gloss>
@@ -16,2 +16 @@
-<gloss>cleaning a gravesite or tomb</gloss>
-<gloss g_type="lit">to clean mos from a gravestone or tomb</gloss>
+<gloss>removal of moss from a tombstone</gloss>

広辞苑：（墓石の苔を掃（はく）意）墓参り。特に盂蘭盆（うらぼん）の墓参  
kotobank.jp: 墓の苔(こけ)をきれいに取り去ること。転じて、墓参り。特に盂蘭盆前の墓参りをいう。  
www.weblio.jp: 〔墓石の苔（こけ）を掃き清める意〕墓参り。特に、盂蘭盆（うらぼん）の墓参をいう。墓掃除。

typo

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>ヘブライみじ</reb>
+<reb>ヘブライもじ</reb>

gg5, daij

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>２世帯住宅</keb>
+</k_ele>

GG5, Daijr

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>two-household house</gloss>
+<gloss>two-family house</gloss>
+<gloss>house for a two-generation family</gloss>

correct reading

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>にせいだいじゅうたく</reb>
+<reb>にせたいじゅうたく</reb>

https://kotobank.jp/word/二世帯住宅-349937

gg5, daij

gg5, daijr
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Outrigger_ski
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/チェアスキー#呼称

daijr/s, jwiki, www-images
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/シットスキー#概略

Daijs redirects to チェアスキー but jwiki explains the difference in usage (supported by www-images).

gg5, daij

Adding spec1
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

@@ -20 +20 @@
-<misc>&unclass;</misc>
+<misc>&myth;</misc>

I think this can close.

http://www.edrdg.org/wiki/index.php/Editorial_policy#Proper_Names

Generally proper names, including mythological thingos, would go in JMnedict/enamdict. See the policy link above. We don't (yet) have a category for them, hence the "unclass(ified)".