daijs: "ロボット。"
daijr: "ロボット1のこと。" (which in turn is 電気・磁気などを動力源とし、精巧な機械装置によって人間に似た動作をする人形。人造人
間。")
britannica: "「ロボット（RUR）」のページをご覧ください。"
GG5: "an android"
eij: "android / artificial human / droid / robot"

That a character in a manga referred to "人造人間" as a form of "サイボーグ" is irrelevant here, esp. as these are apparently 
officially called "androids" in the English version.
All Japanese dictionaries treat 人造人間 as a synonym of ロボット. A cyborg is something different, both in English and 
Japanese dictionaries.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<gloss>android</gloss>
@@ -13 +13,0 @@
-<gloss>android</gloss>
@@ -15 +14,0 @@
-<gloss>cyborg</gloss>

Dragon Ball N° 23 Kanzenban
https://ibb.co/fQ4jEe
https://ibb.co/e9fPEe

A cyborg is an organism, like we humans, that was modified with artificial parts. It belongs to the macro-category of jinzouningen, as well as 
androids/robots (completely mechanical things that resembles humans). Please, insert cyborg entry too. In the reference that I've upload, the 
character talks about N° 19 and N°20 jinzouningen as cyborgs. All the jinzouningen in Dragon Ball (but not only) are different kinds of jnz: for 
example, N°8 is a robot, N°17 and 18 are cyborgs, N°16 is another robot and Cell is an organism created from zero by a scientist. So, jinzouningen 
is, like a said, a macro-category, that include androids, cyborgs and organisms created from zero (with science or magic; about jnz created with 
magic/alchemy, see for example the introduction of Fullmetal Alchemist Live Action, on Netflix).

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<gloss>cyborg</gloss>

gg5, eij

i don't think this is two senses.  also it's not really a cyborg.  that's a real human with computer/machine elements

@@ -13,4 +13 @@
-<gloss>artificianthrope</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>android</gloss>
@@ -18 +14,0 @@
-<gloss>cyborg</gloss>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/ホムンクルス

Artificial human is the literal meaming. Robot and cyborg are only two type of things that belongs to jinzouningen's category. For example, also a 
human created with magic or alchemy (like in Fullmetal Alchemist) is a jinzouningen, an artificial human. "Artificianthrope" is a my neologism, that 
derive from "ARTIFICIal" + "anthrope", human in Greek.

@@ -11,0 +12,5 @@
+<gloss>artificial human</gloss>
+<gloss>artificianthrope</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>

Thank you for taking the time to state the case for your edits, Davide. A throw-away mention in Dragonball and an unusual usage of 
the word in a separate fantasy manga/anime does however not weigh heavier than the dictionaries quoted. Sci-fi/fantasy authors in 
particular often imbue unorthodox meanings to already existing words as part of their world creation. Unless this usage at least 
partially enters mainstream language use, it's not really our job to record that here. 
Your new reference is just the previous version of this very entry (this is JMDict - check the top of the page) as it were before 
Rene removed the "cyborg" gloss.

New reference:
https://ejje.weblio.jp/content/人造人間

No, pardon me.
If something is official is not automatically correct, and this is the case: the definition of "Androids", in Dragon Ball, is limited. Many things 
in the English Dragon Ball version are wrong. Indeed, as I said, jinzouningen is a big-category, in which there are robots, cyborgs and living 
beings (humanoids/human-based) created or modified artificially. In Dragon Ball, N° 8 is a robot, N°16 is a robot, N°17 is a cyborg, N°18 is 
another cyborg (she can even give birth), N°19 is a robot and so on: all are jinzouningen.


Are jinzouningen also the Homunculus, in Fullmetal Alchemist, beings created with "magic" (alchemy), and they are not robots, are "super humans", 
in flesh and bones but with super powers. See for example the introduction of Fullmetal Alchemist Live Action on Netflix, and you will hear the two 
main characters talking about artificial humams (the homunculus) as jinzouningen.

Strangely, if I search jinzouningen here on Jisho it will appear an entry with only "robot, cyborg (and Android)". Only if I click on "read more" 
appear also artificial human, the main translation (but cyborg is gone). 

I will not insist longer, but my advice is to insert firstly the literally meaning, artificial human, and then the variuous things that belongs to 
its cateogry: robot, cyborg, etc.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<gloss>artificial human</gloss>
@@ -13 +13,0 @@
-<gloss>artificial human</gloss>
@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<gloss>cyborg</gloss>

daijs: "ロボット。"
daijr: "ロボット1のこと。" (which in turn is 電気・磁気などを動力源とし、精巧な機械装置によって人間に似た動作をする人形。人造人
間。")
britannica: "「ロボット（RUR）」のページをご覧ください。"
GG5: "an android"
eij: "android / artificial human / droid / robot"

That a character in a manga referred to "人造人間" as a form of "サイボーグ" is irrelevant here, esp. as these are apparently 
officially called "androids" in the English version.
All Japanese dictionaries treat 人造人間 as a synonym of ロボット. A cyborg is something different, both in English and 
Japanese dictionaries.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<gloss>android</gloss>
@@ -13 +13,0 @@
-<gloss>android</gloss>
@@ -15 +14,0 @@
-<gloss>cyborg</gloss>

Dragon Ball N° 23 Kanzenban
https://ibb.co/fQ4jEe
https://ibb.co/e9fPEe

A cyborg is an organism, like we humans, that was modified with artificial parts. It belongs to the macro-category of jinzouningen, as well as 
androids/robots (completely mechanical things that resembles humans). Please, insert cyborg entry too. In the reference that I've upload, the 
character talks about N° 19 and N°20 jinzouningen as cyborgs. All the jinzouningen in Dragon Ball (but not only) are different kinds of jnz: for 
example, N°8 is a robot, N°17 and 18 are cyborgs, N°16 is another robot and Cell is an organism created from zero by a scientist. So, jinzouningen 
is, like a said, a macro-category, that include androids, cyborgs and organisms created from zero (with science or magic; about jnz created with 
magic/alchemy, see for example the introduction of Fullmetal Alchemist Live Action, on Netflix).

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<gloss>cyborg</gloss>

gg5, eij

i don't think this is two senses.  also it's not really a cyborg.  that's a real human with computer/machine elements

@@ -13,4 +13 @@
-<gloss>artificianthrope</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>android</gloss>
@@ -18 +14,0 @@
-<gloss>cyborg</gloss>

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>２進法</keb>
@@ -12,0 +16 @@
+<gloss>base-2</gloss>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

gg5, daij

-> noun gloss

@@ -13 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>check and accept (e.g. a receipt)</gloss>
+<gloss>checking and receiving (an invoice, goods, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>receipt</gloss>

Yes I did. Oops. Thanks.

I think you mean "something".

@@ -19 +19 @@
-<gloss>someone done out of spite</gloss>
+<gloss>something done out of spite</gloss>

daij, gg5
G n-grams:
当て付け	9383
当てつけ	17642

I think this makes the meaning clearer.

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>当て付け</keb>
+<keb>当てつけ</keb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<keb>当てつけ</keb>
+<keb>当て付け</keb>
@@ -18,0 +19,2 @@
+<gloss>someone done out of spite</gloss>
+<gloss>snide remark</gloss>
@@ -21 +23 @@
-<gloss>spiteful remark</gloss>
+<gloss>dig</gloss>

gg5

@@ -6,0 +6,7 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>当てつけ</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>当付</keb>
+<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>
@@ -13,0 +20,2 @@
+<gloss>innuendo</gloss>
+<gloss>spiteful remark</gloss>

G n-grams: 29

I don't think we need this. Not in the refs. A+B. Uncommon.

Kanji Haitani list

Adding yoji tagAdding yoji tag
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<misc>&yoji;</misc>

Entry created

Sorry, I didn't realise it was in the refs.

Well レーンボー is in Daijirin and Daijisen. Curious. It may as well stay as it's harmless.

I think レンボー is a name. It doesn't appear to mean "rainbow".
Also, do we need レーンボー? The n-gram counts are tiny. To me, [ik] signifies a spelling that's irregular/incorrect but somewhat common. It gets zero Google image results.

@@ -11,3 +10,0 @@
-<reb>レンボー</reb>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>

レンボー	520

@@ -10,0 +11,3 @@
+<reb>レンボー</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>

レインボー	870044
レーンボー	104
レインボウ	19696

Proposing to merge レーンボー (2472620).  "ik"?

@@ -9,0 +10,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>レーンボー</reb>
+</r_ele>

ＫＯＤ追加語彙 has it as a sub-entry in the 流血 entry:
"流血沙汰 bloodshed; bloody violence.", and has an example: "流血沙汰になる lead to 「bloodshed [bloody violence]."
G n-grams: 6103

Kanji Haitani entered it in 2007. He later put it on his yoji list, but I don't think it's a real yoji.
It's a bit obvious, but it's the sort of thing I don't mind keeping.

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<misc>&yoji;</misc>
@@ -14,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>bloody violence</gloss>

eijiro doesn't have it as an entry, but it has a couple of examples like
流血沙汰を招く
result in bloodshed

gg5 has 流血の惨事 for "bloodshed" instead

"bloody event" is certainly A+B and "bloodshed" is covered by 流血

seems unneeded

A+B?

Kanji Haitani list

Adding yoji tagAdding yoji tag
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<misc>&yoji;</misc>

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<gloss>closed-interval</gloss>
+<gloss>closed interval</gloss>

Entry created

Indeed.

daij, gg5

@@ -8,2 +8 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<field>&comp;</field>
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>

Entry created

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<field>&comp;</field>

Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ダスト・カバー</reb>

Entry created

Proposed merge with 1134320.

Entry created

Proposed merge with 2059970.

Entry created

Doesn't seem particularly useful or particularly harmful to me. I guess if JMdict is going to support [ok] readings then we may as well use it.

it's in shinkoku and jitenon kokugo too, i think it's useful to keep this information

@@ -8,0 +9,4 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>はくきゅう</reb>
+<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>

I think we can drop はくきゅう. It's only in the unabridged edition of nikk.

@@ -9,4 +8,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>はくきゅう</reb>
-<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>

I don't have access to nikk either, since 
it disappeared from yahoo. But since it's 
tagged ok and passed inspection, I think 
it's fair to assume it's correct unless 
somebody with a copy of nikk says 
different.

based on the refs, it is presumably from nikkoku, which i do not have access to

i agree.

I think adding this would be like adding any word from this list 
https://www.wsfcs.k12.nc.us/cms/lib/NC01001395/Centricity/Domain/1060/huxley_glossary.pdf
to an English-Japanese dictionary.
Unless it's widely used outside of this particular manga, which doesn't seem to be the case, I don't think we should add it. 
The livedoor blog has "探窟者" and in isolation, isn't very convincing.

http://blog.livedoor.jp/modacyoki/archives/51567397.html

Many hits are for メイドイナビス、but there are others. The site I linked to is older than the manga. (Also, it seems to be used for spelunking in Chinese.)

If it's only used in this manga, I don't think we should be adding it.

Hmmm. It's getting Googits, but it's so specific to a particular context (a manga series) it has the risk of being ephemeral.
I'm inclined to accept it, but what do others think?

G n-grams 22 (アナルレイプ gets 5 times more).

Thank you Mr Trump.
Very A+B. I don't think it's needed. Any supporters for this entry?

gg5