Fork

Can we come up with a better wording for the note? I had no idea what it was trying to say until I saw Robin's note in the comments.

oft. used with this meaning
梅肉エキス　肉エキス　チキンエキス

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<gloss>stock</gloss>

OK. I'll put things back and spell it out.

@@ -14 +13,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2168240">エキストラクト</xref>
@@ -16 +15,2 @@
-<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<s_inf>abbr. of "extract", not エキストラクト</s_inf>
+<lsource xml:lang="dut"/>

daijs: "(オランダ)extract（抽出物、の意）から"
koj: "extract(オランダ)の略。抽出物・浸出物の意"
meikyo "extract(オランダ)から。抽出物の意"

I'll repeat what I said before. I don't see how this can be tagged as an abbreviation when none of the dictionaries (kokugos or JEs) have an エキストラクト entry.
The etymological notes in the kokugos make it quite clear that エキス is an abbreviation of "extract", not エキストラクト.
By having an abbr tag, we're saying that エキス is the shortened form of エキストラクト, which isn't true.
エキストラクト is also used in Japanese but it came later.

https://www.ajinomotoafmtrading.co.jp/product/others/product_02.html
チキンエキス that is liquid, but very thick. boullion, broth, stock are all thin, aren't they...?
I remember my mom using this sometimes, though:
https://www.amazon.com/Knorr-Touch-Taste-Concentrated-Bouillon/dp/B00BHFA8XG/ref=cm_cr_arp_d_product_top?ie=UTF8
which is in similar consistency.

@@ -18 +18,2 @@
-<gloss>stock (powder)</gloss>
+<gloss>concentrate</gloss>
+<gloss>concentrated stock</gloss>

Maybe more accurate.

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<gloss>stock</gloss>
+<gloss>stock (powder)</gloss>

"stoxk powder"?

Stock is a watery liquid. Is エキス used with that meaning? I'm not sure it is.
I agree about the etymology note. Maybe this is better.

@@ -15,2 +15 @@
-<s_inf>abbr. of "extract", not エキストラクト</s_inf>
-<lsource xml:lang="dut"/>
+<s_inf>abbr. of Dutch "extract"</s_inf>

G n-grams:
花崗岩	135569
花こう岩	14279
かこう岩	423

花 is 常用漢字. Don't need かこう岩.

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<keb>かこう岩</keb>
+<keb>花こう岩</keb>

@@ -15 +14,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

gg5 koj daijs

I don't think "standard" is correct

@@ -18,0 +19,3 @@
+<gloss>basics</gloss>
+<gloss>fundamentals</gloss>
+<gloss>basis</gloss>
@@ -20,2 +22,0 @@
-<gloss>basis</gloss>
-<gloss>standard</gloss>

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oHIyyr7CPeI

Not necessarily on signs.

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

Thanks

I'm not seeing much evidence that this is used on signs so reverting to 休み中 might be best.

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>お休み中</keb>
+<keb>休み中</keb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>おやすみちゅう</reb>
+<reb>やすみちゅう</reb>
@@ -12 +12,9 @@
-<gloss>closed</gloss>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>during vacation</gloss>
+<gloss>during the holidays</gloss>
+<gloss>during one's break</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<s_inf>usu. as お休み中</s_inf>
+<gloss>(temporarily) closed</gloss>

お休み中	296752
休み中	444447

While tidying up orphaned example sentences, I found there are 6 indexed to the original 休み中, of which 5 refer specifically to "vacation" or "holiday". I can index them to お休み中, but I think it needs something more direct than "on break". Alternatively, perhaps 休み中 can be revived as an entry.

a little questionable, I think.

@@ -14 +13,0 @@
-<gloss>while vacationing</gloss>

gg5, daijs, meikyo

Added sense.

@@ -17,0 +18,5 @@
+<gloss>form of a character (e.g. simplified, traditional)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1344100">書体</xref>
@@ -18,0 +24 @@
+<gloss>typeface</gloss>
@@ -20 +25,0 @@
-<gloss>lettering</gloss>

gg5, daij

Splitting into senses.

@@ -16,2 +15,0 @@
-<gloss>calligraphic style</gloss>
-<gloss>calligraphic styles</gloss>
@@ -19,0 +18,5 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>style of handwriting</gloss>
+<gloss>calligraphic style</gloss>
+</sense>

mk

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -26,0 +28 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -32,0 +35 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

Thanks; done now.

I kept it open because Jim said he needs to tag sentences.

feel free to self-approve a change such as this

[n] goes first.

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -18 +18,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -24,0 +25 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -26 +26,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -30,0 +31 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -32 +32,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1515210">母方・ははかた・1</xref>
@@ -21,0 +23 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1515210">母方・ははかた・2</xref>

gg5 koj daijs
G n-grams:
  父方の祖母	20320
  父方の祖父	15882
  ...

clearer with two senses i think
also useful for E->J lookups

@@ -18 +17,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -20,0 +20,4 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<gloss>paternal (grandfather, uncle, etc.)</gloss>
+</sense>

gg5, prog

Don't agree with "point of sale". That's something else.
Not [adj-no].

@@ -21,4 +21,4 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<gloss>place where things are sold</gloss>
-<gloss>point of sale</gloss>
-<gloss>POS</gloss>
+<gloss>selling area</gloss>
+<gloss>counter</gloss>
+<gloss>section</gloss>
+<gloss>department</gloss>
@@ -26 +25,0 @@
-<gloss>counter (in shop)</gloss>

中辞典

@@ -31 +31 @@
-<xref type="see">買い場</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2828622">買い場</xref>

gg5 daijs

@@ -27,0 +28,7 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2828620">売り時</xref>
+<xref type="see">買い場</xref>
+<gloss>favorable time to sell</gloss>
+<gloss>good time to sell</gloss>
+</sense>

@@ -40 +40 @@
-<gloss>rays of the sun</gloss>
+<gloss>rays of the Sun</gloss>

slight change of ordering makes the entry easier to read

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<keb>日ざし</keb>
+<keb>陽差し</keb>
@@ -20 +20 @@
-<keb>陽差し</keb>
+<keb>日ざし</keb>

dajs: 日差（し）／▽陽▽射し
daijr:  日差し・陽射し
G n-grams:
 日差し	1683418
 日射	119297  -- also  にっしゃ, probably false match
 日射し	83012
 日ざし	46526
 日差	26350  
 陽射し	454011
 陽差し	18044
 陽射	11562
 陽ざし	28992
 陽差	282
---------------------------------------------------
 日差しが強く	73600
 陽射しが強く	11847
 日射しが強く	2405
 日ざしが強く	1057
 日射が強く	450    日射 is also  にっしゃ, probably false match
 陽差しが強く	247
 陽ざしが強く	273
 陽射が強く	126
 日差が強く	75
 陽差が強く	No matches

messy

@@ -10,0 +11,3 @@
+<keb>陽射し</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -14 +17 @@
-<keb>陽射</keb>
+<keb>日ざし</keb>
@@ -17 +20 @@
-<keb>陽射し</keb>
+<keb>陽差し</keb>
@@ -20 +23,7 @@
-<keb>日ざし</keb>
+<keb>陽ざし</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>日差</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>陽射</keb>

gg5: "場内はしんと静まりかえった"

Not exclusively [vs]. Probably shouldn't lead with that PoS.

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
@@ -12 +12,0 @@
-<pos>&adv;</pos>
@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<gloss>deathly quiet</gloss>

G n-grams:
しんと	91967
シンと	65912

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>シンと</reb>

gg5 koj daijs
G n-grams:
  御影石 	133687
  みかげ石	 10457
  みかげいし	   868

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>みかげ石</keb>
@@ -11,0 +15 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1195110">花崗岩・かこうがん</xref>

meikyo

g n-gram
大根おろし 388607
大根下ろし 4519
大根卸し 4032
だいこんおろし 10969
だいこおろし 65

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>大根下ろし</keb>

daij

Splitting into senses.

@@ -18,0 +19,3 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>

I think we need "translation" in at least one of the glosses.

@@ -13,2 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>super-liberal interpretation</gloss>
-<gloss>making understandable, readable through free interpretation</gloss>
+<gloss>super-liberal translation</gloss>
+<gloss>making understandable and readable through free interpretation</gloss>

Entry created

daij, koj

Not just a computing term.

@@ -8,2 +8,2 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<field>&comp;</field>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1958400">多言語</xref>

Entry created

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
@@ -12 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>An Lushan Rebellion (in China, 755-763 CE)</gloss>
+<misc>&hist;</misc>
+<gloss>An Lushan Rebellion (in China; 755-763 CE)</gloss>

The standard term in English is "An Lushan rebellion".
I checked three books about Chinese history,
including History of Imperial China (6 volumes) from Harvard Univ. Pr.

reordered glosses
An Lushan Rebellion gets more than 1000 times as many googits as An-Shi Rebellion

@@ -12,2 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>An-Shi Rebellion (755-763 CE)</gloss>
-<gloss>An Lushan Rebellion</gloss>
+<gloss>An Lushan Rebellion (in China, 755-763 CE)</gloss>
+<gloss>An-Shi Rebellion</gloss>

Or died of famine, etc.

dupe branch

km

事ム所	46

I wouldn't be opposed to adding this to the 事務所 entry as an alternative reading but I don't think it's common enough to 
warrant inclusion on its own.

Reopen.

ありがーと	783
ありがと	4255043
ありがとう	95539750
ありがーとう	352
アリガート	146

I'm going to close this and then reopen it to reduce the clutter. I intend to get to the broader issue of handling oddball variants, but it will be a while. I like RObin's comments about ありがーと and I'm tossing in some n-gram counts in that area. It's interesting how common ありがと is.

i agree, but i don't think it fits in enamdict and we have a history of letting these kinds of things in.

i think ideally all these bizarre orthographical variants would just be handled by some kind of software interface to the dictionary that allows for fuzzy matching

Meant to delete it.

There's not really a clear consensus here but it's been almost 6 months now. I'm going to delete this based on arguments made by me, 
Robin, and Rene. I'll add it to the 事務所 entry but as I've said, I wouldn't be miffed if it isn't included at all.

reopen as a reminder

close and reopen. given the extent of the conversation, probably this is a matter for the mailing list

It might be the case that it's much more common in handwritten Japanese than online.
https://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q118149731
"私は急いでメモしないといけないときに、一種の略字として
まだれ（广）の中に“Ｋ”や“Ｏ”を入れて「慶応」としたり、
... こういう表記で、他に便利なのはありませんか？
...
事務所は事ム所だな。務はみんなムにしちゃう。"
https://books.google.co.jp/books?
id=KlYNMV9Ot0MC&lpg=PA430&ots=RhPIs9dLWH&dq=%22'%E4%BA%8B%E3%83%A0%E6%89%80%22%20%22%E5%8B%99%22&pg=PA430#v=onepage&q=%22
'%E4%BA%8B%E3%83%A0%E6%89%80%22%20%22%E5%8B%99%22&f=false
"全く務の字が一寸むづかしい貸めに、軍なる片暇名でその務音を示し間に合せてみる" (1936)
(149 unique hits on google books for 事ム所)
If so, I think that strengthens the case to include it, but it's hard to look into of course.
In general, we have included some pretty obscure kanji forms in plenty of entries. As long as they're properly marked as 
iK or oK, I don't think it's that much of an issue. Dictionary developers can decide for themselves how prominently (or 
not) they want to display these.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panda_bonds

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&finc;</field>

https://www.ifinance.ne.jp/glossary/bond/bon228.html

G n-grams:
申す迄もなく	243
申すまでもなく	18957

Pretty common. I think it's worth having.

@@ -4,0 +5,3 @@
+<keb>申すまでもなく</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -5,0 +9,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>申す迄も無く</keb>
@@ -11,2 +17,6 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>Needless to say</gloss>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2067940">言うまでもなく</xref>
+<misc>&hum;</misc>
+<gloss>needless to say</gloss>
+<gloss>obviously</gloss>
+<gloss>of course</gloss>

吾輩は猫である (1906), 
from:
Natsume Soseki, Teihon Soseki zenshu vol. 1, Tokyo: Iwanami shoten, 2016, pag. 158
https://www.iwanami.co.jp/book/b266526.html

It is the same of the less formal sentence 言うまでもなく.

象鳥	180
ぞうちょう	1071
ソウチョウ	295

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

daijr, koj

@@ -11 +11,2 @@
-<gloss xml:lang="mas">Tokumitsu</gloss>
+<misc>&male;</misc>
+<gloss>Tokumitsu</gloss>

man's first name/given name