Fork. Stephen submitted a comment before this one.

Re: Robin
It is my understanding from reading here that the jisho.org maintainers are pretty responsive.  Is there a chance someone with existing connections could make a request:

    Please don't display the "usually kanji" or other kanji-dependent tags (eg. [gikun]) when no kanji are displayed due to [sK]?

Re:Marcus

I had/have the exact same viewpoint. From the vantage of studying kanji, rather than studying vocabulary, I like seeing these forms even if they are rare.  But I defer.
Here's the github discussion for reference:
https://github.com/JMdictProject/JMdictIssues/issues/75#issuecomment-1435712638

I don't think it makes much sense to hide away a rare kanji form with sK. Who's going to search for it considering how obscure it is? Why not have it marked rK instead, letting app developers etc. decide how mudh prominence they want to give it?

On 1011300, it was tentatively decided that [uk] should be kept on entries that only have sK kanji forms, out of consideration for websites/apps that don't support the tag.

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

Removed [uk].  Only kanji are [sK], so not needed.

@@ -14 +13,0 @@
-<misc>&uk;</misc>

I have referred this entry and its comments to Kim.

Yes, hiding rare irregular kanji forms is our usual practice. If 含羞む were in other refs, we'd tag it as rK.
Jim, Brian's suggestion to contact the people at jisho.org and alert them to the uk/sK issue seems like a good idea. At the same time, you could remind them about recently added field tags (e.g. ski, film, tv, rommyth) which still aren't supported on jisho.org.

Since the kanji form is in プログレッシブ it should be searchable. it is very rare and I agree it's probably best hidden. [uk] should stay as that has some impacts on apps using this data for parsing.

In a fork, Brian wrote:

  Re: Robin
  It is my understanding from reading here that the jisho.org maintainers are pretty responsive.  Is there a chance someone with existing connections could make a request:

      Please don't display the "usually kanji" or other kanji-dependent tags (eg. [gikun]) when no kanji are displayed due to [sK]?

  Re:Marcus

  I had/have the exact same viewpoint. From the vantage of studying kanji, rather than studying vocabulary, I like seeing these forms even if they are rare.  But I defer.
  Here's the github discussion for reference:
  https://github.com/JMdictProject/JMdictIssues/issues/75#issuecomment-1435712638

We decided a while ago that we didn't want both [iK] and [rK] tags on the same form, so the alternatives were to tag it [sK] or to drop it altogether.

We've been dropping rare and irregular forms which don't produce any n-gram counts (see: Robin's comment on 1238790). Since 含羞む gets a few hundred counts, I don't think we should dismiss the idea that people will search for it. I think having these search keys in the database can also be useful for programs that are designed to parse and tokenize text.

Many entries are affected by this policy. See for example comments on entry 2854734

meikyo: 「五時━に会おう」「財布には千円━しかない」

@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+<pos>&suf;</pos>

Japanese dictionaries gloss it as ちょうど, きっかり, etc. which are adverbs.

@@ -9 +9 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>

daijr

@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+<s_inf>used with times, amounts of money, etc.</s_inf>
@@ -11,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>precisely</gloss>
@@ -12,0 +15 @@
+<gloss>sharp</gloss>

Saint, GG 5, etc.

I think it should stay, but maybe not first gloss, as in Gg5. Luminous says the full term is 
wasei.

@@ -9 +8,0 @@
-<lsource xml:lang="eng">howling</lsource>
@@ -11,0 +11 @@
+<gloss>howl</gloss>

howl | houl |
noun
a long, loud, doleful cry uttered by an animal such as a dog or wolf.
• a loud cry of pain, fear, anger, amusement, or derision: he let out a howl of anguish | figurative : I got howls of protest from readers.
• [in singular] a prolonged wailing noise such as that made by a strong wind: they listened to the howl of the gale.
• Electronics a wailing noise in a loudspeaker due to electrical or acoustic feedback.

it's in the dictionary in macos.  i think it should remain as the primary gloss with the others being explanatory/supplemental

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Audio_feedback

I don't think it's typically called "howling" in English.

@@ -9 +9,3 @@
-<gloss>howling (esp. audio feedback)</gloss>
+<lsource xml:lang="eng">howling</lsource>
+<gloss>audio feedback</gloss>
+<gloss>acoustic feedback</gloss>

yuck

G n-grams:
フュージョン	393981
ヒュージョン	2818

@@ -7,0 +8,4 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ヒュージョン</reb>
+<re_inf>&ik;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>

gg5, daij

Two senses here.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<field>&comp;</field>
+<xref type="see" seq="1130490">ミクロ</xref>
@@ -14,0 +15,5 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<field>&comp;</field>
+<gloss>macro (instruction)</gloss>
+</sense>

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1127370">マクロ・1</xref>

gg5, prog

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>previous announcement</gloss>

oops

G n-grams: 300

A+B? Doesn't appear to be that commmon.

gg5, prog, ウィズダム和英辞典

@@ -12,0 +13,2 @@
+<gloss>false show of power</gloss>
+<gloss>bold front</gloss>

I think that's a good idea. I've created a new かし entry.

@@ -25,4 +24,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>かし</reb>
-<re_restr>河岸</re_restr>
-</r_ele>
@@ -34,11 +29,0 @@
-<sense>
-<stagr>かし</stagr>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>market on the riverbank (esp. fish market)</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<stagr>かし</stagr>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>place (for activities)</gloss>
-<gloss>venue</gloss>
-</sense>

I'd be happy to have かし (河岸) split off into its own entry.

gg5, daij

Added sense and restr tags.

@@ -31 +30,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -35,0 +35 @@
+<stagr>かし</stagr>
@@ -37,2 +37,7 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<gloss>fish market</gloss>
+<gloss>market on the riverbank (esp. fish market)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<stagr>かし</stagr>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>place (for activities)</gloss>
+<gloss>venue</gloss>

any dictionary

it's one word

@@ -32,1 +32,1 @@
-<gloss>river bank</gloss>
+<gloss>riverbank</gloss>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

gg5, prog

@@ -19 +19,2 @@
-<gloss>crowd</gloss>
+<gloss>crowding together</gloss>
+<gloss>clustering together</gloss>
@@ -21 +22 @@
-<gloss>dense</gloss>
+<gloss>swarm</gloss>

That's better.

OK. I think the gloss needs to change, though. It's intransitive.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -14 +15,2 @@
-<gloss>to change the state of things</gloss>
+<gloss>to change completely</gloss>
+<gloss>to transform</gloss>

It is getting some valid use, so I prefer to tag it as obscure. I suspect it's a back-formation from 様変わり.

@@ -11,0 +12,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1794380">様変わり・さまがわり</xref>
+<misc>&obsc;</misc>

G n-grams: 104

This isn't in any of my refs (only 様変わり). Can it go?

To enable EJ searches we avoid that style of spelling.

@@ -33,2 +33 @@
-<gloss>judgment</gloss>
-<gloss>judgement</gloss>
+<gloss>judg(e)ment</gloss>

https://www.dictionary.com/e/judgement-vs-judgment/

@@ -33,0 +34 @@
+<gloss>judgement</gloss>

@@ -33 +33 @@
-<gloss>judgement</gloss>
+<gloss>judgment</gloss>

gg5

@@ -25,0 +26,2 @@
+<gloss>glasses</gloss>
+<gloss>eyeglasses</gloss>
@@ -27 +28,0 @@
-<gloss>glasses</gloss>

Fork.

WordNet 
https://ejje.web
lio.jp/content/%
E6%B2%B3%E5%8E%9
F

@@ -26,0 +27 @@
+<gloss>flood plain</gloss>

gg5, oxford, merriam-webster

"Riverbed" is usually one word.

@@ -25 +25 @@
-<gloss>dry river bed</gloss>
+<gloss>dry riverbed</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
734,641	 58.1%	河原
526,071	 41.6%	川原
  4,277	  0.3%	磧
655,804	   -  	かわら

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

I don't think Wordnet's translation is correct. 氾濫原 is the more usual term for flood plain.

@@ -27 +26,0 @@
-<gloss>flood plain</gloss>

WordNet 
https://ejje.web
lio.jp/content/%
E6%B2%B3%E5%8E%9
F

@@ -26,0 +27 @@
+<gloss>flood plain</gloss>

daij, meikyo, gg5, prog, 中辞典

Expanding. Surprised we only had one sense all this time.

@@ -17,0 +18,24 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<gloss>to cramp up</gloss>
+<gloss>to tighten</gloss>
+<gloss>to stiffen</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5r;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<gloss>to be insistent</gloss>
+<gloss>to persist (in one's opinion)</gloss>
+<gloss>to stick to one's guns</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5r;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<gloss>to act tough</gloss>
+<gloss>to bluff</gloss>
+<gloss>to be defiant</gloss>
+<gloss>to be unruly</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5r;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>to prop up (e.g. with a post)</gloss>
@@ -19,2 +43,12 @@
-<gloss>to become stiff</gloss>
-<gloss>to become taut</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5r;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>to push out (one's legs or arms)</gloss>
+<gloss>to stretch (e.g. an arm against the wall)</gloss>
+<gloss>to press</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5r;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<field>&sumo;</field>
@@ -22,2 +55,0 @@
-<gloss>to stick to (one's opinion)</gloss>
-<gloss>to insist on</gloss>

daij, prog, gg5

I think we need to show that it's not just a chemistry term.

@@ -19,0 +20,9 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<gloss>sublimating (an emotion, impulse, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>channelling</gloss>
+<gloss>diverting</gloss>
+<gloss>converting</gloss>
+<gloss>elevating</gloss>
+</sense>

GG5

Also used in psychology.

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<field>&chem;</field>

@@ -11,0 +12,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2039940">横列</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2039940">横列</xref>

gg5, daij

Not [adj-no].

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -14,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>(vertical) line</gloss>

gg5, daij

Splitting into senses.

@@ -12 +12,5 @@
-<gloss>square formation</gloss>
+<gloss>square formation (of troops)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1671750">魔方陣</xref>

mk

@@ -19,0 +20 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

gg5, daij

@@ -7,0 +8,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>様変り</keb>
@@ -17,0 +21 @@
+<gloss>transformation</gloss>

gloss seems functionally identical to me

prog etc.

@@ -16,1 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>complete change</gloss>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<gloss>changing completely</gloss>

I completely missed that there was a long discussion below. If everyone settled on [obs], then there's probably no reason to relitigate.

Sankoku and daijirin say that 認知症 was proposed as a replacement for 痴呆症 in 2004.

https://www.edrdg.org/wiki/index.php/Editorial_policy
>> "obs" (obsolete). This is typically used for terms that were in use in the Meiji and early Showa periods, but are no longer in general use, e.g. they have been supplanted by another term.

Just going by the date ranges assigned to [arch] and [obs], I would have tagged this entry as [dated] rather than [obs].

Probably shouldn't have freq tags on an obs-tagged term.

@@ -6,2 +5,0 @@
-<ke_pri>news2</ke_pri>
-<ke_pri>nf37</ke_pri>
@@ -11,2 +8,0 @@
-<re_pri>news2</re_pri>
-<re_pri>nf37</re_pri>

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<field>&med;</field>

OK, let's make it "obs". I agree we need clearer guidelines for the tag.

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<misc>&obs;</misc>

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1709450">縦列</xref>

To distinguish from 縦列.

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>horizontal line</gloss>

Entry created

GG5 has "Clione limacina" too, but doesn't gloss it as "clione".

I guess if it's only "esp. of species Clione limacina" it can be just "clione".

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/クリオネ

I capitalised "Clione" because I assumed it did refer to the genus (in addition to the species Clione limacina). I realise now that can't be right (because there's no 属 after クリオネ).
That being said, I'm still not sure what クリオネ actually refers to. The jwiki article suggests it's a common name for species of genus Clione, but according to daijr, it *only* refers to Clione limacina, in which case the gloss should be "common clione".
Even if Wikipedia is correct, I'm not seeing any evidence that "Clione" refers to anything other than the genus. It appears to be always capitalised.

if capitalized, it commits a category error.  "Clione" refers to a genus (i.e., it's the proper name of a taxon; in Japanese, クリオネ属) not to individual organisms that belong to the genus.  at best, they would be "cliones" (uncapitalized), assuming that this genus name is in fact used as the common name of the organisms.  the original uncapitalized gloss was correct.  also, the gloss should not say it refers to the genus, since the genus name in Japanese is クリオネ属.  this is a member of the genus

@@ -9 +9 @@
-<gloss>Clione (genus of small floating sea slugs, esp. Clione limacina)</gloss>
+<gloss>clione (small floating sea slug of the genus Clione, esp. of species Clione limacina)</gloss>

gg5
daijr: "マキガイ綱ハダカカメガイ目の一種ハダカカメガイの通称。"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clione

Better?

@@ -9 +9,2 @@
-<gloss>clione</gloss>
+<gloss>Clione (genus of small floating sea slugs, esp. Clione limacina)</gloss>
+<gloss>naked sea butterfly</gloss>

Entry created

gg5, prog

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<gloss>to put on a bold front</gloss>

@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@
+<pos>&v5r;</pos>
@@ -13,0 +14,1 @@
+<gloss>to act brave</gloss>

Entry created

not that common, but there are examples on the web

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2836675">ＪＩＴコンパイラ・ジェーアイティーコンパイラ</xref>
@@ -13 +14,2 @@
-<gloss>Just-In-Time Compiler</gloss>
+<gloss>just-in-time compiler</gloss>
+<gloss>JIT compiler</gloss>

G n-grams:
ジャストインタイムコンパイラ	No matches
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/実行時コンパイラ

"JITコンパイラ" and "実行時コンパイラ" appear to be the usual translations. Do we want to add those (or get rid of this)?

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>Just In Time Compiler</gloss>
+<gloss>Just-In-Time Compiler</gloss>

Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ジャスト・イン・タイム・コンパイラ</reb>

Entry created

daijs

Not a computing term.

@@ -9 +8,0 @@
-<field>&comp;</field>

Entry created

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forward_pass#Rugby_football
https://laws.worldrugby.org/?law=11

I thought this was wasei until I checked the rules.
I've only ever heard "forward pass".

@@ -12 +12,3 @@
-<gloss>throw forward</gloss>
+<field>&sports;</field>
+<gloss>throw forward (rugby)</gloss>
+<gloss>forward pass</gloss>

Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>スロー・フォワード</reb>

Entry created

gg5, daij

I don't think "take into consideration" is quite right.

@@ -18 +18,2 @@
-<gloss>to not take into consideration</gloss>
+<gloss>to disregard</gloss>
+<gloss>to treat as useless</gloss>

gg5

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<gloss>to treat with disdain</gloss>

daijr/s
http://www.mytokachi.jp/mikeneko99/entry/10
http://minkara.carview.co.jp/en/userid/908037/blog/30442089/
"人の好意を無碍にするヤツは許さない"
ngrams

I think it probably should be merged. GG5 just had イケイケ with its "go-go" meaning, then added 行け行け in its "connecting; separating" sense. 
I'll set up a merge. This can be deleted if that's approved.

Shouldn't this be merged with 2656760? I think they're the same word.

GG5: 〔慎重さを欠いた積極性･抑制のきかない奔放性〕  and glossed as "go-go".

I don't think that makes a food case for the proposed changes. Better the way it was.

@@ -10 +10,3 @@
-<gloss>gaudily dressed and assertive</gloss>
+<misc>&dated;</misc>
+<gloss>fashionably clothed and assertive (esp. a woman)</gloss>
+<gloss>go-go</gloss>

i (male) was called イケイケ外人 by a friend of 
a friend when i wore sunglasses, 15 years ago. 
young people might not use it but people in 
their 30s probably do

@@ -10,2 +10 @@
-<misc>&dated;</misc>
-<gloss>(of a woman) fashionably clothed and sexually assertive</gloss>
+<gloss>gaudily dressed and assertive</gloss>

gg5, daij
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prevalence

Those old newspaper-based rankings almost certainly only applied to the other readings.

@@ -6,2 +5,0 @@
-<ke_pri>news1</ke_pri>
-<ke_pri>nf21</ke_pri>
@@ -11,2 +8,0 @@
-<re_pri>news1</re_pri>
-<re_pri>nf21</re_pri>
@@ -15,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1390060">川岸・かわぎし</xref>

Jim will have to clarify, but i think that unlike the news frequency lists (which were determined only by the frequency of headwords and for which the frequencies of the readings are unknown), the ichi1 list specifies headword/reading combos and therefore the ichi tag shouldn't be moved here from 河岸[かわぎし] since it would refer specifically to that combo

temp approve

@@ -6 +5,0 @@
-<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>
@@ -11,0 +11,2 @@
+<re_pri>news1</re_pri>
+<re_pri>nf21</re_pri>

Splitting from 1390060.

Better than "screen".

@@ -10 +10 @@
-<gloss>bezel-less (screen)</gloss>
+<gloss>bezel-less (display)</gloss>

daijs
"スマートフォン端末では2015年ごろからベゼルレスの画面を実現した端末が増え始めた"
"サムスンの「Galaxy S8」がベゼルレスを採用したモデルを発売"

daijr

Plenty of Google hits.

daijs

yikes

http://www.tbilisi.gov.ge/?lang=en
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tbilisi

@@ -9 +9 @@
-<gloss>Tbilisi (Russia)</gloss>
+<gloss>Tbilisi (Georgia)</gloss>

Adding spec1
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

Company name.

@@ -1,3 +1,2 @@
-<ent_seq>2302320</ent_seq>
-<ent_corp>jmdict</ent_corp>
+<ent_corp>jmnedict</ent_corp>
@@ -8,2 +7 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<field>&comp;</field>
+<misc>&company;</misc>

Not sure what this is. Delete?

Entry created

Adding spec1
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

@@ -11 +10,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>

Yes

@@ -1,3 +1,2 @@
-<ent_seq>2302300</ent_seq>
-<ent_corp>jmdict</ent_corp>
+<ent_corp>jmnedict</ent_corp>
@@ -12 +11 @@
-<field>&comp;</field>
+<misc>&product;</misc>

https://www.wdic.org/w/TECH/ジャストウィンドウ

This appears to be a product made by JustSystems in the 90s. Move to jmnedict?

Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ジャスト・ウィンドウ</reb>