I have referred this entry and its comments to Kim.

Yes, hiding rare irregular kanji forms is our usual practice. If 含羞む were in other refs, we'd tag it as rK.
Jim, Brian's suggestion to contact the people at jisho.org and alert them to the uk/sK issue seems like a good idea. At the same time, you could remind them about recently added field tags (e.g. ski, film, tv, rommyth) which still aren't supported on jisho.org.

Since the kanji form is in プログレッシブ it should be searchable. it is very rare and I agree it's probably best hidden. [uk] should stay as that has some impacts on apps using this data for parsing.

In a fork, Brian wrote:

  Re: Robin
  It is my understanding from reading here that the jisho.org maintainers are pretty responsive.  Is there a chance someone with existing connections could make a request:

      Please don't display the "usually kanji" or other kanji-dependent tags (eg. [gikun]) when no kanji are displayed due to [sK]?

  Re:Marcus

  I had/have the exact same viewpoint. From the vantage of studying kanji, rather than studying vocabulary, I like seeing these forms even if they are rare.  But I defer.
  Here's the github discussion for reference:
  https://github.com/JMdictProject/JMdictIssues/issues/75#issuecomment-1435712638

We decided a while ago that we didn't want both [iK] and [rK] tags on the same form, so the alternatives were to tag it [sK] or to drop it altogether.

We've been dropping rare and irregular forms which don't produce any n-gram counts (see: Robin's comment on 1238790). Since 含羞む gets a few hundred counts, I don't think we should dismiss the idea that people will search for it. I think having these search keys in the database can also be useful for programs that are designed to parse and tokenize text.

Many entries are affected by this policy. See for example comments on entry 2854734

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss>Qiang language</gloss>
+<gloss>Qiang (language)</gloss>

Interesting.

Wikipedia and yahoo dictionary

@@ -14,0 +15,4 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>Qiang language</gloss>
+</sense>

https://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q1375214868
『チャン語』という言い方(ただし、侮辱用語)がある

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<misc>&vulg;</misc>
+<misc>&derog;</misc>

I think that's a good idea. I've created a new かし entry.

@@ -25,4 +24,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>かし</reb>
-<re_restr>河岸</re_restr>
-</r_ele>
@@ -34,11 +29,0 @@
-<sense>
-<stagr>かし</stagr>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>market on the riverbank (esp. fish market)</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<stagr>かし</stagr>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>place (for activities)</gloss>
-<gloss>venue</gloss>
-</sense>

I'd be happy to have かし (河岸) split off into its own entry.

gg5, daij

Added sense and restr tags.

@@ -31 +30,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -35,0 +35 @@
+<stagr>かし</stagr>
@@ -37,2 +37,7 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<gloss>fish market</gloss>
+<gloss>market on the riverbank (esp. fish market)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<stagr>かし</stagr>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>place (for activities)</gloss>
+<gloss>venue</gloss>

any dictionary

it's one word

@@ -32,1 +32,1 @@
-<gloss>river bank</gloss>
+<gloss>riverbank</gloss>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

gg5, prog

@@ -19 +19,2 @@
-<gloss>crowd</gloss>
+<gloss>crowding together</gloss>
+<gloss>clustering together</gloss>
@@ -21 +22 @@
-<gloss>dense</gloss>
+<gloss>swarm</gloss>

That's better.

OK. I think the gloss needs to change, though. It's intransitive.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -14 +15,2 @@
-<gloss>to change the state of things</gloss>
+<gloss>to change completely</gloss>
+<gloss>to transform</gloss>

It is getting some valid use, so I prefer to tag it as obscure. I suspect it's a back-formation from 様変わり.

@@ -11,0 +12,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1794380">様変わり・さまがわり</xref>
+<misc>&obsc;</misc>

G n-grams: 104

This isn't in any of my refs (only 様変わり). Can it go?

Fork.

WordNet 
https://ejje.web
lio.jp/content/%
E6%B2%B3%E5%8E%9
F

@@ -26,0 +27 @@
+<gloss>flood plain</gloss>

gg5, oxford, merriam-webster

"Riverbed" is usually one word.

@@ -25 +25 @@
-<gloss>dry river bed</gloss>
+<gloss>dry riverbed</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
734,641	 58.1%	河原
526,071	 41.6%	川原
  4,277	  0.3%	磧
655,804	   -  	かわら

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

I don't think Wordnet's translation is correct. 氾濫原 is the more usual term for flood plain.

@@ -27 +26,0 @@
-<gloss>flood plain</gloss>

WordNet 
https://ejje.web
lio.jp/content/%
E6%B2%B3%E5%8E%9
F

@@ -26,0 +27 @@
+<gloss>flood plain</gloss>

gg5, daij

Splitting into senses.

@@ -12 +12,5 @@
-<gloss>square formation</gloss>
+<gloss>square formation (of troops)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1671750">魔方陣</xref>

OK. Done.

@@ -14,9 +13,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>せつざん</reb>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>せっさん</reb>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>せっせん</reb>
-</r_ele>
@@ -24,3 +14,0 @@
-<stagr>ゆきやま</stagr>
-<stagr>せつざん</stagr>
-<stagr>せっさん</stagr>
@@ -32 +19,0 @@
-<stagr>ゆきやま</stagr>
@@ -35,8 +21,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<stagr>せつざん</stagr>
-<stagr>せっさん</stagr>
-<stagr>せっせん</stagr>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="1103970">ヒマラヤ</xref>
-<gloss>Himalayas</gloss>

I propose splitting out せつざん；せっさん；せっせん into a separate entry. It would be a lot cleaner.

daij, prog

Made a mistake with the restr tags in my previous amendment.

@@ -32,3 +32 @@
-<stagr>せつざん</stagr>
-<stagr>せっさん</stagr>
-<stagr>せっせん</stagr>
+<stagr>ゆきやま</stagr>

Daijr, n-grams:
雪山	506456
せつざん	2901
ゆきやま	5281
せっさん	1670
せっせん	1387

I suspect from the n-grams, Daijirin's rather convoluted xrefs and the fact that most JEs only have ゆきやま, that that's the more common reading.

@@ -10 +10 @@
-<reb>せつざん</reb>
+<reb>ゆきやま</reb>
@@ -15 +15 @@
-<reb>ゆきやま</reb>
+<reb>せつざん</reb>
@@ -23,0 +24 @@
+<stagr>ゆきやま</stagr>
@@ -25 +25,0 @@
-<stagr>ゆきやま</stagr>

gg5, daij

Added sense.

@@ -19,0 +20,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>せっせん</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -20,0 +24,3 @@
+<stagr>せつざん</stagr>
+<stagr>ゆきやま</stagr>
+<stagr>せっさん</stagr>
@@ -22 +28,2 @@
-<gloss>snowy mountains</gloss>
+<gloss>snowy mountain</gloss>
+<gloss>permanently snow-covered mountain</gloss>
@@ -24,0 +32,3 @@
+<stagr>せつざん</stagr>
+<stagr>せっさん</stagr>
+<stagr>せっせん</stagr>
@@ -26 +36,9 @@
-<gloss>piles of snow</gloss>
+<gloss>pile of snow</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<stagr>せつざん</stagr>
+<stagr>せっさん</stagr>
+<stagr>せっせん</stagr>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1103970">ヒマラヤ</xref>
+<gloss>Himalayas</gloss>

meikyo

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<misc>&col;</misc>
@@ -14 +15 @@
-<gloss>to put on an airs</gloss>
+<gloss>to put on airs</gloss>

スカす	4171
スカした	13034
スカして	11492

You're probably right. It takes a bit of digging.

It's hard to tell which spelling is more common for this meaning, but スカす is more likely to be this than すかす.

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>スカす</reb>
+</r_ele>

koj, meikyo, gg5

Intransitive.

@@ -8,0 +9,3 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<gloss>to be affected</gloss>
+<gloss>to put on an airs</gloss>
@@ -10,2 +12,0 @@
-<gloss>to be affected</gloss>
-<gloss>to put on an air</gloss>

Entry created

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forward_pass#Rugby_football
https://laws.worldrugby.org/?law=11

I thought this was wasei until I checked the rules.
I've only ever heard "forward pass".

@@ -12 +12,3 @@
-<gloss>throw forward</gloss>
+<field>&sports;</field>
+<gloss>throw forward (rugby)</gloss>
+<gloss>forward pass</gloss>

Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>スロー・フォワード</reb>

Entry created

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>sit spin (figure skating)</gloss>
+<field>&figskt;</field>
+<gloss>sit spin</gloss>

koj

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>sit spin</gloss>
+<gloss>sit spin (figure skating)</gloss>

Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>シット・スピン</reb>

Entry created

gg5, daij

I don't think "take into consideration" is quite right.

@@ -18 +18,2 @@
-<gloss>to not take into consideration</gloss>
+<gloss>to disregard</gloss>
+<gloss>to treat as useless</gloss>

gg5

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<gloss>to treat with disdain</gloss>

daijr/s
http://www.mytokachi.jp/mikeneko99/entry/10
http://minkara.carview.co.jp/en/userid/908037/blog/30442089/
"人の好意を無碍にするヤツは許さない"
ngrams

dupe branch

km

事ム所	46

I wouldn't be opposed to adding this to the 事務所 entry as an alternative reading but I don't think it's common enough to 
warrant inclusion on its own.

Reopen.

ありがーと	783
ありがと	4255043
ありがとう	95539750
ありがーとう	352
アリガート	146

I'm going to close this and then reopen it to reduce the clutter. I intend to get to the broader issue of handling oddball variants, but it will be a while. I like RObin's comments about ありがーと and I'm tossing in some n-gram counts in that area. It's interesting how common ありがと is.

i agree, but i don't think it fits in enamdict and we have a history of letting these kinds of things in.

i think ideally all these bizarre orthographical variants would just be handled by some kind of software interface to the dictionary that allows for fuzzy matching

Meant to delete it.

There's not really a clear consensus here but it's been almost 6 months now. I'm going to delete this based on arguments made by me, 
Robin, and Rene. I'll add it to the 事務所 entry but as I've said, I wouldn't be miffed if it isn't included at all.

reopen as a reminder

close and reopen. given the extent of the conversation, probably this is a matter for the mailing list

It might be the case that it's much more common in handwritten Japanese than online.
https://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q118149731
"私は急いでメモしないといけないときに、一種の略字として
まだれ（广）の中に“Ｋ”や“Ｏ”を入れて「慶応」としたり、
... こういう表記で、他に便利なのはありませんか？
...
事務所は事ム所だな。務はみんなムにしちゃう。"
https://books.google.co.jp/books?
id=KlYNMV9Ot0MC&lpg=PA430&ots=RhPIs9dLWH&dq=%22'%E4%BA%8B%E3%83%A0%E6%89%80%22%20%22%E5%8B%99%22&pg=PA430#v=onepage&q=%22
'%E4%BA%8B%E3%83%A0%E6%89%80%22%20%22%E5%8B%99%22&f=false
"全く務の字が一寸むづかしい貸めに、軍なる片暇名でその務音を示し間に合せてみる" (1936)
(149 unique hits on google books for 事ム所)
If so, I think that strengthens the case to include it, but it's hard to look into of course.
In general, we have included some pretty obscure kanji forms in plenty of entries. As long as they're properly marked as 
iK or oK, I don't think it's that much of an issue. Dictionary developers can decide for themselves how prominently (or 
not) they want to display these.

I think it probably should be merged. GG5 just had イケイケ with its "go-go" meaning, then added 行け行け in its "connecting; separating" sense. 
I'll set up a merge. This can be deleted if that's approved.

Shouldn't this be merged with 2656760? I think they're the same word.

GG5: 〔慎重さを欠いた積極性･抑制のきかない奔放性〕  and glossed as "go-go".

I don't think that makes a food case for the proposed changes. Better the way it was.

@@ -10 +10,3 @@
-<gloss>gaudily dressed and assertive</gloss>
+<misc>&dated;</misc>
+<gloss>fashionably clothed and assertive (esp. a woman)</gloss>
+<gloss>go-go</gloss>

i (male) was called イケイケ外人 by a friend of 
a friend when i wore sunglasses, 15 years ago. 
young people might not use it but people in 
their 30s probably do

@@ -10,2 +10 @@
-<misc>&dated;</misc>
-<gloss>(of a woman) fashionably clothed and sexually assertive</gloss>
+<gloss>gaudily dressed and assertive</gloss>

gg5, daij
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prevalence