@@ -29,0 +30 @@
+<gloss>to tattle</gloss>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

gg5, prog, daij

Not [adj-no].

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<gloss>revealing (information, a secret, etc.)</gloss>
@@ -15 +15,2 @@
-<gloss>revealing (e.g. a secret)</gloss>
+<gloss>telling</gloss>
+<gloss>letting out</gloss>

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<gloss>reveal (e.g. a secret)</gloss>
+<gloss>revealing (e.g. a secret)</gloss>

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<gloss>reveal (i.e. a secret)</gloss>
+<gloss>reveal (e.g. a secret)</gloss>

There's no need to include "be" with intransitive verb translations unless it's the only way to do them. You need it in cases like "to be amazed" or "to be torn off", but "to burn" is fine for 焦げる.

To be consistent with other intransitive verbs' definition, the format of "to BE [past participle]" should be used.

@@ -19,4 +19,4 @@
-<gloss>to burn</gloss>
-<gloss>to scorch</gloss>
-<gloss>to char</gloss>
-<gloss>to singe</gloss>
+<gloss>to be burned</gloss>
+<gloss>to be scorched</gloss>
+<gloss>to be charred</gloss>
+<gloss>to be singed</gloss>

@@ -20 +20 @@
-<gloss>to scotch</gloss>
+<gloss>to scorch</gloss>

gg5, prog

Wasn't sure whether to put these glosses into the passive form but with the [vi] tag they're probably fine.

@@ -20 +20,3 @@
-<gloss>to be burned</gloss>
+<gloss>to scotch</gloss>
+<gloss>to char</gloss>
+<gloss>to singe</gloss>

石鹸	3338077
石けん	2267712

Noted. I'll comment further on the シャボン entry.

see rejected submission on シャボン.  石鹸 was suggested as a headword there and シャボン was changed to gikun (which doesn't make sense because it can't be a gikun reading for the foreign word that it corresponds to).  if anywhere, シャボン should be added as a gikun reading here.

however, 石鹸=シャボン is not supported by any dictionary, although daijs has 石鹸=サボン.  i think that should be handled as gikun here or as an "also written as" note on サボン

Daijr

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>

@@ -11,0 +12,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>石鹼</keb>

Reopen.

Eijiro, GG5 examples. G n-grams:
俗に言う	233232
俗に言い	712
俗に言え	1371
俗に言っ	373
俗に言わ	10444

I've sat on this too long. While I can understand the Japanese OK, I think it's useful for people looking for the appropriate Japanese for the equivalent phrase in English, or to check if they've constructed something that's actually used in Japanese (as this expression clearly is). To quote the GG5 usages:
俗に言う癒し系の音楽 music to relax to, as people call it
俗に言えば［いわゆる］ to use a common 「word ［phrase］; in everyday language; in the language of the street; as is said in common 「talk ［speech, parlance>］; as is commonly said; as folks say; as the saying is
慣れると不思議さが減ると俗に言う． They say that familiarity takes the wonder out of things.
Temp approval with extra glosses (which I'm sure can be improved._

@@ -13 +13,5 @@
-<gloss>to be commonly referred to as ...</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1343150">所謂・いわゆる</xref>
+<gloss>to be commonly referred to as</gloss>
+<gloss>as people say</gloss>
+<gloss>as the saying is</gloss>
+<gloss>they say</gloss>

Certainly does but do we need this?

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<misc>&proverb;</misc>

ぎょうちゅう	2775	6.1%
ぎょう虫	29307	64.8%
蟯虫	4673	10.3%
ギョウちゅう	0	0.0%
ギョウ虫	4097	9.1%
ギョウチュウ	4354	9.6%

@@ -15,6 +14,0 @@
-<re_restr>ぎょう虫</re_restr>
-<re_restr>蟯虫</re_restr>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>ギョウちゅう</reb>
-<re_restr>ギョウ虫</re_restr>

gg5 wiki
G n-grams:
 ぎょう虫   	29307
 蟯虫      	 4673
 ギョウチュウ	 4354
 ギョウ虫   	 4097
 ぎょうちゅう	 2775

@@ -4,0 +5,3 @@
+<keb>ぎょう虫</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -5,0 +9,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ギョウ虫</keb>
@@ -8,0 +15,10 @@
+<re_restr>ぎょう虫</re_restr>
+<re_restr>蟯虫</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ギョウちゅう</reb>
+<re_restr>ギョウ虫</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ギョウチュウ</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>
@@ -11,0 +28 @@
+<gloss>pinworm (Enterobius vermicularis)</gloss>
@@ -13 +29,0 @@
-<gloss>pinworm</gloss>

Rejecting this side of the fork should fix it.

Yes, I'd looked at the ふうしゃ entries and not the かざぐるま ones. The windmill Wikipedia entry has both readings. I'll cancel it all.

The kokugos all have 風車 (ふうしゃ) for sense 1 of かざぐるま.
Should they really be split?

Daijr, GG5, etc, etc. Google images

This needs to be split. All the refs have ふうしゃ and かざぐるま in different entries with different meanings. I can't find a case of かざぐるま being associated with a windmill.

@@ -11,3 +10,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>かざぐるま</reb>
@@ -16,4 +12,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>カザグルマ</reb>
-<re_nokanji/>
@@ -25,13 +17,0 @@
-<sense>
-<stagr>かざぐるま</stagr>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>pinwheel (toy)</gloss>
-<gloss>windmill (toy)</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<stagr>かざぐるま</stagr>
-<stagr>カザグルマ</stagr>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<misc>&uk;</misc>
-<gloss>Clematis patens (species of climbing plant)</gloss>
-</sense>

Surely the non-toy sense should go first?

@@ -9,0 +10,3 @@
+<reb>ふうしゃ</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -13,3 +15,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>ふうしゃ</reb>
@@ -21,0 +22,4 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>windmill</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
@@ -26,4 +29,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>windmill</gloss>

@@ -39 +38,0 @@
-<stagr>カザグルマ</stagr>

風車	        608894	98.2%
風ぐるま	        5991	1.0%
カザグルマ	5070	0.8%

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -23 +24 @@
-<re_nokanji/>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

I really wonder if this should be split.

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/中央防波堤埋立地#歴史 (windmill picture description)

風ぐるま	5991

@@ -8,0 +9,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>風ぐるま</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -10,0 +14 @@
+<re_restr>風車</re_restr>

G n-grams:
 清々しい   	345604
 清清しい   	 63033
 すがすがしい	331242

see also Rene's comment

@@ -17 +16,0 @@
-<misc>&uk;</misc>

for me:
清々しい-5,850,000
すがすがしい-3,290,000
清清しい-741,000

I get 2,830,000 for すがすがしい

prog

When I Google "すがすがしい", sometimes I get 29M hits, other times I get 71M hits. Not sure what's going on, but either way it looks [uk] to me (I get about the same number of hits for the kanji forms as Nils).

@@ -17,0 +17,1 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -21,0 +22,1 @@
+<gloss>refreshed</gloss>

5,020,000 清々しい
2,840,000 すがすがしい
  679,000 清清しい

remove [uk]
more glosses and examples

@@ -17,1 +17,3 @@
-<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>refreshing (e.g. feeling, scene, wind, morning air)</gloss>
+<gloss>brisk</gloss>
+<gloss>bracing</gloss>
@@ -19,1 +21,0 @@
-<gloss>refreshing</gloss>

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panther
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/panther

gg5 has "panther" but the word is so ambiguous that I think it is best avoided

@@ -22 +21,0 @@
-<gloss>panther</gloss>

@@ -22,0 +22,1 @@
+<gloss>panther</gloss>

daijs
http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/ヒョウ

@@ -14,0 +14,4 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ヒョウ</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>
+</r_ele>
@@ -16,2 +20,2 @@
-<gloss>leopard</gloss>
-<gloss>panther</gloss>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>leopard (Panthera pardus)</gloss>

Not entirely sure [vt] is needed. Only meikyo, iwakoku, and sankoku have both [vi] and [vt] tags. 

daijr/s, koj, meikyo, and sankoku don't say that the -も- okurigana is optional. I'm tagging 身籠る and 身篭る as [io].

姙る was just a rare itaiji form. Probably not needed.

@@ -8,6 +7,0 @@
-<keb>身籠る</keb>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>身篭る</keb>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
@@ -18 +11,0 @@
-<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -26 +19,9 @@
-<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>身籠る</keb>
+<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>身篭る</keb>
+<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>
@@ -32,0 +34 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
@@ -34 +35,0 @@
-<pos>&vt;</pos>

sankoku, iwakoku
Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ を身ごもる │  3,581 │ 15.5% │
│ を身ごもっ │ 19,455 │ 84.5% │
╰─ーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬───────┬───────╮
│ 身ごもる │ 5,593 │ 42.5% │
│ 身籠る　 │ 4,347 │ 33.0% │
│ 身篭る　 │ 1,961 │ 14.9% │
│ 身籠もる │   415 │  3.2% │
│ 身篭もる │    24 │  0.2% │ add rK
│ 妊る　　 │   129 │  1.0% │ add rK (daijr/s, obunsha, shinkok)
│ 孕る　　 │     0 │  0.0% │ add sK (daijr)
│ 姙る　　 │     0 │  0.0% │ remove - i dont see it anywhere
│ みごもる │   705 │  5.4% │
╰─ーーーー─┴───────┴───────╯

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -20,0 +22 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -24,3 +26 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>姙る</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -33,0 +34 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

daijs

@@ -11,0 +12,6 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>身籠もる</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>身篭もる</keb>

G n-grams:
 身ごもる	5593
 身籠る	4347
 身篭る	1961
 妊る	 129
 孕る	No matches
 姙る	No matches
 みごもる	 705

@@ -8,0 +9,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>身篭る</keb>

The "rendering" doesn't really add anything.

@@ -21 +21 @@
-<gloss>native Japanese reading (rendering) of a Chinese character</gloss>
+<gloss>native Japanese reading of a Chinese character</gloss>

GG5

@@ -22,0 +23,8 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&suf;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1718690">処世訓・しょせいくん</xref>
+<gloss>precept</gloss>
+<gloss>lesson</gloss>
+<gloss>one's teachings</gloss>
+</sense>

koj, daijr, daijs

@@ -14,0 +14,4 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>くに</reb>
+<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>
@@ -16,0 +20,1 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1576900">音・おん・4</xref>

gg5 wiki

@@ -9 +9 @@
-<gloss>puma</gloss>
+<gloss>puma (Puma concolor)</gloss>
@@ -11 +11 @@
-<gloss>American lion</gloss>
+<gloss>mountain lion</gloss>

Entry created

Quiet. Closing.

I wouldn't touch sense 1 - it's what all the references have. Sense 2 could become "[euph] unconfirmed death", but I think it's OK as-is.

realized daijr has this note:
〔蘇生の可能性を含む。医師による心臓停止・呼吸停止・脈拍停止・瞳孔散大の診断・宣言が必要とされる死亡に対していう〕

I was thinking a lot about this entry the day Abe was shot, when officially the "心肺停止" lasted for several hours. I can't be sure this entry was the basis for it but I saw his condition referred to as "showing no vital signs" in English-language media and I felt a pang of guilt as I wasn't really sure this was an entirely accurate description (after the 心肺停止 was first announced, he was flown to a hospital and had 30 or so liters of blood pumped into him, before they finally announced his death). 

I'm wondering what other editors think, should maybe sense 2 be reworked into a note on sense 1?

[note="oft. used in media for a death which is yet to be declared by a medical professional"]

Work?
Maybe just one sense with a "lit" translation would be best.

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<s_inf>media euphemism for unconfirmed death</s_inf>
+<s_inf>media term for unconfirmed death</s_inf>

花も恥じらう	2409
花も恥らう	7624

Curious.

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>花も恥じらう</keb>
+<keb>花も恥らう</keb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<keb>花も恥らう</keb>
+<keb>花も恥じらう</keb>

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>花も恥らう</keb>

花も恥じらい	44
花も恥じらっ	22
花も恥じらう	2409

A few inflected versions.

daij

I think this is adj-f rather than a verb, looking at the usage

@@ -12,3 +12,4 @@
-<pos>&v5u;</pos>
-<gloss>(girl) who outblooms even a flower</gloss>
-<gloss g_type="lit">even the flower will blush (before her beauty)</gloss>
+<pos>&adj-f;</pos>
+<misc>&id;</misc>
+<gloss>outblooming even a flower (of a young girl)</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="lit">even the flower blushes (before her beauty)</gloss>

gg5

OK. I'll strip the verb conjugation code from the 10 entries listed in comment 10 below.

reopen

what a pain.  ok, well i'll approve what you're suggesting and then reopen because there are a ton of entries for this in the queue

@@ -16 +15,0 @@
-<pos>&v1;</pos>

信用できない	305779
信用できる	262320

When "adj-f" first emerged and got described as "noun or verb acting prenominally" I think I had in mind that the verb would either not be conjugating or was conjugated already, as in 得も言われぬ or ああいった. Then along comes 信用できる/信用できない and mucks things up. I'm very tempted to say that if a verb is usually prenominal, don't have a v1/v5x tag. I think that should work, and 信用できない can fend for itself. Of course 食べる doesn't get an "adj-f".
So, I guess I'm back to Marcus' earlier position, and drop the verb tag for these cases.

seems like the adj-f is unneeded.  e.g., 食べるもの means 'things to eat', but we don't mark 食べる or any other verb as adj-f.  i suggest adj-f not be used anywhere that it's tagged as a verb

Two weeks and no comment. Closing.

それと分かる	13168
それとわかる	19440

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
@@ -11,0 +13 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

GG5

@@ -14,0 +14,2 @@
+<gloss>recognizable</gloss>
+<gloss>observable</gloss>

http://ejje.weblio.jp/content/それと分かる　　
http://thesaurus.weblio.jp/content/それと分かる

Aligning.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -14,0 +16 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -21,2 +22,0 @@
-<pos>&v5s;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="2761770">へそで茶を沸かす・1</xref>
@@ -25,3 +25,10 @@
-<gloss>what a hoot!</gloss>
-<gloss>joke of the century!</gloss>
-<gloss g_type="lit">one's navel boils water</gloss>
+<gloss>what a joke!</gloss>
+<gloss>don't make me laugh!</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<pos>&v5s;</pos>
+<misc>&id;</misc>
+<gloss>to split one's sides laughing</gloss>
+<gloss>to be convulsed with laughter</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="lit">one's navel boils water (using the heat generated by laughing)</gloss>

My apologies, thank you for the clarification from both of you.  I was about to come back and say this was presumptuous of me, and that this is clearly an issue in jisho.org.

jisho.org clearly usually handles this just fine(for short terms). And now I see, as you said, that it includes the readings after *all* of the links.  I guess I never thought anything of it.  It was just a coincidence that this broken link happened to have an explicit reading embedded in jmdict, and then I made a lot of assumptions.

It looks like the length of this particular expression pushes it into some kind of tokenizer, after which the "reading" half is no longer identified as an element. But that's jisho's  problem.  Thanks again.

This is something being addressed in the "NG" version of the database, which is under development.
If you set up an xref to just the entry alone ([see=2761770]) you get the reading in the XML edition, whether it's needed or not.

One seems like plenty.

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

〈嫌よ嫌よ／いやよいやよ／イヤよイヤよ〉も〈好／す〉きの〈内／うち〉

Jitsuyou leads with the うち form

Presumably newer than the n-grams

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -14,0 +16 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -17,0 +20 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -20,0 +24 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -24,9 +27,0 @@
-<re_restr>嫌よ嫌よも好きのうち</re_restr>
-<re_restr>嫌よ嫌よも好きの内</re_restr>
-<re_restr>いやよいやよも好きのうち</re_restr>
-<re_restr>いやよいやよも好きの内</re_restr>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>イヤよイヤよもすきのうち</reb>
-<re_restr>イヤよイヤよも好きのうち</re_restr>
-<re_restr>イヤよイヤよも好きの内</re_restr>

Sharp eyes!

One of the readings was missing a "よ".

@@ -23 +23 @@
-<reb>いやよいやもすきのうち</reb>
+<reb>いやよいやよもすきのうち</reb>

gg5 wiki
G n-grams:
 蟯虫症     	1009
 ぎょう虫症	856

Fork. I need to reject it.

i agree.  all refs i can see are related to china.  i think we should consider this as a chinese word that's not japanized

I really don't think this is a Japanese word, only a Chinese one.  It doesn't belong here.
https://www.jetro.go.jp/ext_images/_Reports/01/91c49e2fc5e39931/20160013.pdf
”IoT とは、機械・機器や設備などあらゆるモノに通
信機能を持たせてインターネットと接続し、相互に制
御する仕組みのこと。既に具体化に向けた動きが世界
各国で加速中だ。中国では「物聯網」と呼ばれる。" (with rubies over the kanji: ウーレンワン)

http://www.spc.jst.go.jp/hottopics/1601/r1601_crcc01.html
https://www.translatorscafe.com/tcterms/en-AU/question.aspx?id=86567

聯網 is used for the Internet in Chinese, and yes 物聯網 is IOT.

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>ものがたりもiswhatBingTranslatorgivesbutIdon'treallybelieveit.</reb>
+<reb>ウーレンワン</reb>
@@ -12 +12,3 @@
-<gloss>Internet of things</gloss>
+<lsource xml:lang="chi"/>
+<gloss>Internet Of Things</gloss>
+<gloss>IOT</gloss>

I found it in a Japanese document talking about China telecoms services.  The usage was 物聯網サービス

It's really Chinese but there are a few references in current Japanese literature.  Probably mostly talking about IOT in China.
I doubt that this will become a common usage in Japanese.  Mostly just of current interest.

OK. I've added it to my special glossing file.

I'm in favor of rejecting

http://tech.nikkeibp.co.jp/it/article/COLUMN/20101026/353396/
http://www.nec.co.jp/press/ja/1011/2904.html

I don't think we need it. In most of the links I found, it's referring to a governmental scheme/project rather than the concept of IoT itself.

Or "in Chinese".
Rene (in a forked thread) favoured rejecting it. Any other views? I won't lose sleep if it goes, but I might pop it in my "glossing extras" file for WWWJDIC.

Is this better? Based on the examples 
posted...

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<gloss>Internet of Things (Chinese name)</gloss>
+<gloss>Internet of Things (in China)</gloss>

おもんねー	1162
おもんねーな	76

Not worth "adj-na".

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>

G n-grams, too.

I see Unidic has おもん as a morpheme derived from 面白い. I don't think it's stand-alone.

@@ -8,0 +9,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>おもんねえ</reb>

km
おもんねー	28
おもんね	11
おもんねえ	7
https://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q11116885871
12 hits past hour on twitter for おもんねー

Daijr, GG5, etc.

Two clear senses. Sense 2 could be improved.

@@ -6,0 +7,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>フラッシュ・カード</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -9 +12,6 @@
-<gloss>flash card</gloss>
+<field>&comp;</field>
+<gloss>flash memory card</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>flash card (education, sports, etc.)</gloss>

WISDOM, daijr

Adding spec1
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

英和コンピューター用語辞典