Putting the "bin" glosses together.
"trash can" beats out "garbage can" in the n-grams.

@@ -29,0 +30 @@
+<gloss>trash can</gloss>
@@ -32 +32,0 @@
-<gloss>trash can</gloss>

ゴミばこ	1090
ごみばこ	8614

Dropping ゴミばこ and the associated restrictions.

@@ -25,2 +25 @@
-<reb>ゴミばこ</reb>
-<re_restr>ゴミ箱</re_restr>
+<reb>ごみばこ</reb>
@@ -28,7 +26,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>ごみばこ</reb>
-<re_restr>ごみ箱</re_restr>
-<re_restr>護美箱</re_restr>
-<re_restr>塵箱</re_restr>
-<re_restr>芥箱</re_restr>

ゴミ箱	1093282
ごみ箱	262905
護美箱	3379
塵箱	1115
芥箱	341

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -16,0 +18 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -19,0 +22 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

lsrc split

@@ -17,12 +16,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<lsource xml:lang="eng">diagram</lsource>
-<gloss>(railway) schedule</gloss>
-<gloss>timetable</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="1076680">ダイアグラム</xref>
-<misc>&abbr;</misc>
-<gloss>diagram</gloss>

I did wonder about it. Better to zap it if it's doubtful.

@@ -30,4 +29,0 @@
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>dyer</gloss>
-</sense>

i'm not convinced of "dyer".  gakken katakana has イヤーズ・カモミール, but that's all i can find in a dictionary supporting this

Daijr, GG5, 中辞典, etc.

Sense 2 and 3 probably come from a common source, but they now have different meanings.

@@ -19,0 +20 @@
+<lsource xml:lang="eng">diagram</lsource>
@@ -20,0 +22 @@
+<gloss>timetable</gloss>
@@ -23,0 +26 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1076680">ダイアグラム</xref>

Leave it for now.

Google images, google search results are dominated by the ring

I'm still not opposed to having these as two separate entries (based on the nakaguro)

@@ -11,0 +12,6 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<lsource ls_wasei="y">pair ring</lsource>
+<gloss>couple's ring</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">set of rings worn by unmarried, unengaged couples</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
@@ -17,6 +22,0 @@
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<lsource ls_wasei="y">pair ring</lsource>
-<gloss>couple's ring</gloss>
-<gloss g_type="expl">set of rings worn by unmarried, unengaged couples</gloss>
-</sense>

I can't find evidence either. I think the senses should reverse.

@@ -8,0 +8,9 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ペア・リング</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<sense>
+<stagr>ペアリング</stagr>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<gloss>pairing</gloss>
+</sense>
@@ -14,9 +23,0 @@
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<pos>&vs;</pos>
-<gloss>pairing</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>unmarried couple living together</gloss>
-</sense>

google images
daijs
"ペアリングできない"  89,600 results (bluetooth pairing)
can't find any evidence for the "unmarried couple living 
together" sense?

should pair ring maybe be split out? since it's ペア・リング?

@@ -10,0 +10,7 @@
+<lsource ls_wasei="y">pair ring</lsource>
+<gloss>couple's ring</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">set of rings worn by unmarried, unengaged couples</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>

Looks fine.

If we need a note, and I'm not entirely sure we do, I think this is sufficient.
I don't think "(medical)" is needed. The second gloss makes the meaning unambiguous.

@@ -22,4 +22,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1612760">お医者さん</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1159930">医師・いし</xref>
-<s_inf>less polite than 医師 or お医者さん</s_inf>
-<gloss>(medical) doctor</gloss>
+<s_inf>usu. as お医者さん in polite speech</s_inf>
+<gloss>doctor</gloss>

this entry is not お医者さん but 医者, so the note as it was didn't really make much sense. "less polite than..." helps explains the relation between this word and お医者さん and 医師 and makes the note relevant to this entry.

@@ -24 +24 @@
-<s_inf>お医者さん is polite</s_inf>
+<s_inf>less polite than 医師 or お医者さん</s_inf>

@@ -24 +24 @@
-<s_inf>lお医者さん is polite</s_inf>
+<s_inf>お医者さん is polite</s_inf>

Reopen.

Looks a lot better now.

meikyo
たま・う【▽賜う・▽給う】
動五
終止形・連体形、ならびに連用形は、「たもう」ということも多い。その場合、現代かなづかいは「たもう」とするのが一般的。

shimeikai has no entry for たもう, but one example sentence for たまう is given as たもう
「神の与えたもうた試練」

yeah, this is a mess.  e.g. koj has three separate entries (oubunsha kogo jiten has four) for:
--
たまう 【給う・賜う】
[1][v5u,vt][hon]
to give

たまう 【給ふ・賜ふ】       
[1][v2h-s,vt][arch,hum]
to receive
*but it's also a v4h variant of the other たまう

たも・う 【給ふ・賜ふ】
[1][v4h,vt][arch,hon]
to give
[1][v2h-s,vt][arch,hum]
to receive

but the conjugations of koj's たもう don't match the conjugation of たもう in modern japanese (described by meikyo above).  for modern japanese, we need たまう=v5u, たもう=v5u-s (but only conjugates as 終止形, 連体形, 連用形)

also, we generally don't give suffixes before the meaning of the standalone word, so the order should be swapped

@@ -13,3 +12,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>たもう</reb>
-</r_ele>
@@ -17,8 +14 @@
-<pos>&aux-v;</pos>
-<pos>&v5u-s;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="2134420">給え</xref>
-<s_inf>after the -masu stem of a verb</s_inf>
-<gloss>to do</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&v5u-s;</pos>
+<pos>&v5u;</pos>
@@ -28,0 +19,8 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&suf;</pos>
+<pos>&v5u;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2134420">給え</xref>
+<misc>&hon;</misc>
+<s_inf>after the -masu stem of a verb</s_inf>
+<gloss>to do ...</gloss>
+</sense>

See the discussion on 2840979.
I suspect the best solution will be to split the たまう and たもう versions of this and 
related entries into separate entries with their distinct pos tags.

Should we mark the たもう reading as not having a stem/ending boundary or conjugating? If we don't do so, some users or client software might 
pronounce it as タモウ or conjugate it as たもいます / たもえ.

As far as I know, only some words have the cross-boundary reading giving rise to a new combination of stem + ending:
【言う】いう→ゆう→ゆった
【酔う】えう→よう→よった
According to this link, 給う isn't such a word:
https://oshiete.goo.ne.jp/qa/1844024.html

See discussion on 2840979.

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<pos>&v5u;</pos>
+<pos>&v5u-s;</pos>
@@ -24 +24 @@
-<pos>&v5u;</pos>
+<pos>&v5u-s;</pos>

襟足	70,504	92.1%	
えり足	5,391	7.0%	
衿足	649	0.8%	- not in the kokugos but valid kanji for えり
領脚	0	0.0%	- in the kokugos
襟脚	88	0.1%    - in gg5

@@ -7,0 +8,4 @@
+<keb>領脚</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -8,0 +13 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -11,0 +17 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -14 +20,2 @@
-<keb>領脚</keb>
+<keb>襟脚</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -21,2 +28,2 @@
-<gloss>hairline at nape of neck</gloss>
-<gloss>nape of neck</gloss>
+<gloss>hairline at the nape of the neck</gloss>
+<gloss>nape</gloss>

Forget that. I didn't notice the "また，そのあたり" in daijr.

@@ -21 +20,0 @@
-<gloss>border of hair at back of neck</gloss>
@@ -22,0 +22 @@
+<gloss>nape of neck</gloss>

daij, gg5, prog

I don't think "nape" is right.

@@ -21 +20,0 @@
-<gloss>nape of neck</gloss>
@@ -22,0 +22 @@
+<gloss>hairline at nape of neck</gloss>

only an [exp] can be marked as [id].  in any case, the mailing list is the place for conversation

I don't think the constituent parts are just kanji - 月並み is a compound of two words, 魂柱 isn't. Surely "leg-pulling" is just as 
idiomatic in usage as "pulling one's leg"?

Here the only "constituent parts" are the kanji. That doesn't make it idiomatic, any more than 魂柱 is.

Point taken. But the usage is idiomatic, though? "Not apparent from its constituent parts." Wouldn't it better to change the definition in 
the help file to "idiomatic usage"?

a single word cannot be an idiom.  the tag for [id] says it is defined as "idiomatic expression".  if an entry doesn't take [exp] then it can't take [id]

correct restriction is つきなみ; also applies to 月次 with that reading

@@ -33,2 +33 @@
-<stagk>月並み</stagk>
-<stagk>月並</stagk>
+<stagr>つきなみ</stagr>
@@ -37 +35,0 @@
-<misc>&id;</misc>

@@ -29,0 +30 @@
+<gloss>to tattle</gloss>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

gg5, prog, daij

Not [adj-no].

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<gloss>revealing (information, a secret, etc.)</gloss>
@@ -15 +15,2 @@
-<gloss>revealing (e.g. a secret)</gloss>
+<gloss>telling</gloss>
+<gloss>letting out</gloss>

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<gloss>reveal (e.g. a secret)</gloss>
+<gloss>revealing (e.g. a secret)</gloss>

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<gloss>reveal (i.e. a secret)</gloss>
+<gloss>reveal (e.g. a secret)</gloss>

ウィズダム英和辞典 / ウィズダム和英辞典

@@ -24,0 +25,4 @@
+<gloss>to be outstanding</gloss>
+<gloss>to be remarkable</gloss>
+<gloss>to be striking</gloss>
+<gloss>to be notable</gloss>

GG5, etc.

@@ -22 +21,0 @@
-<gloss>to stand out</gloss>
@@ -24,0 +24 @@
+<gloss>to stand out</gloss>

https://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/word/en/際立つ/#je-18800

@@ -21,0 +22 @@
+<gloss>to stand out</gloss>

koj

@@ -20,0 +21 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

OK. Drop it.

@@ -22,10 +21,0 @@
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<pos>&vs;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="2843864">外出自粛</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2843864">外出自粛</xref>
-<misc>&abbr;</misc>
-<gloss>social distancing</gloss>
-<gloss>self-imposed quarantine</gloss>
-<gloss>isolation</gloss>
-</sense>

I don't like this 2nd sense at all. 自粛 and 外出自粛 are different things.

As I commented a few weeks back, I think it's more a euphemism. Maybe putting it in a separate sense works.

@@ -20,0 +21,7 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2843864">外出自粛</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2843864">外出自粛</xref>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
@@ -21,0 +29,2 @@
+<gloss>self-imposed quarantine</gloss>
+<gloss>isolation</gloss>

https://www.tokyo-np.co.jp/article/tochigi/list/202004/CK2020041902000130.html

As of spring 2020, 外出自粛 and 自粛活動 appear to be the Japanese-language analogues to "social distancing" as used in the United States.

@@ -20,0 +21 @@
+<gloss>social distancing</gloss>

Reopen.

Eijiro, GG5 examples. G n-grams:
俗に言う	233232
俗に言い	712
俗に言え	1371
俗に言っ	373
俗に言わ	10444

I've sat on this too long. While I can understand the Japanese OK, I think it's useful for people looking for the appropriate Japanese for the equivalent phrase in English, or to check if they've constructed something that's actually used in Japanese (as this expression clearly is). To quote the GG5 usages:
俗に言う癒し系の音楽 music to relax to, as people call it
俗に言えば［いわゆる］ to use a common 「word ［phrase］; in everyday language; in the language of the street; as is said in common 「talk ［speech, parlance>］; as is commonly said; as folks say; as the saying is
慣れると不思議さが減ると俗に言う． They say that familiarity takes the wonder out of things.
Temp approval with extra glosses (which I'm sure can be improved._

@@ -13 +13,5 @@
-<gloss>to be commonly referred to as ...</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1343150">所謂・いわゆる</xref>
+<gloss>to be commonly referred to as</gloss>
+<gloss>as people say</gloss>
+<gloss>as the saying is</gloss>
+<gloss>they say</gloss>

Certainly does but do we need this?

daij, gg5

Added sense.

@@ -18,0 +19,5 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>unexpected opposition</gloss>
+<gloss>unexpected obstacle</gloss>
+</sense>

〈区／區〉〈画／劃／畫〉

區畫	113

@@ -15,0 +16,4 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>區畫</keb>

We can hide the kyuuji form of 区

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

meikyo

区画	1284962
区劃	1309
區劃	337

or oK?

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -14,0 +16 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -24,0 +27 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

G n-grams:
区劃	1309
區劃	337

Please provide sources.
区劃 is in the dictionaries. It should be not be removed.
區劃 is not in the refs but 區 is an 異体字 so this is a valid form.

@@ -8,0 +9,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>区劃</keb>

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<keb>区劃</keb>
+<keb>區劃</keb>

切り戻す	6333
切り戻し	63912
https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=切り戻す

I have no record of where the original gloss came from, but it looks very doubtful.
With the exception of EDICT-derived material, all other WWW hits are to do with gardening.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>to switch-back (reversal of redundancy switching following repair)</gloss>
+<gloss>to prune back (plant, shrub, etc.)</gloss>

ok?

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>switch-back (reversal of redundancy switching following repair)</gloss>
+<gloss>to switch-back (reversal of redundancy switching following repair)</gloss>

where did all these noun-verbs come from?

@@ -11,1 +11,1 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&v5s;</pos>

GG5  & ルミナス as "心肺停止(状態)" G n-grams:
心肺停止状態	18130
心肺停止	58514

I guess so.

it's not. even eijiro doesn't bother

km
心肺停止状態	371

Not sure this entry is needed.

@@ -11,0 +12,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2394940">心肺停止</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2394940">心肺停止・1</xref>
@@ -13,0 +16,6 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see">心肺停止</xref>
+<s_inf>used by media to refer to a death not yet confirmed by a medical professional</s_inf>
+<gloss>showing no vital signs</gloss>
+</sense>

Entry created

なるほど。

i think this qualifies as slang

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<misc>&col;</misc>
+<misc>&sl;</misc>

Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>チェリー・ボーイ</reb>

Entry created

based on the ref comment, i assume the intention was to add 切り戻し not 切り戻.  following daij for [io]

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>切り戻</keb>
+<keb>切り戻し</keb>
@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>

https://www.weblio.jp/content/切戻し
切り戻し	63912
切戻し	2250
WWW images.

Gardening; not computing.

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>切り戻</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -12,3 +15,2 @@
-<field>&comp;</field>
-<gloss>cut back</gloss>
-<gloss>revert</gloss>
+<gloss>cutting back</gloss>
+<gloss>pruning</gloss>

Entry created

Quiet. Closing.

I wouldn't touch sense 1 - it's what all the references have. Sense 2 could become "[euph] unconfirmed death", but I think it's OK as-is.

realized daijr has this note:
〔蘇生の可能性を含む。医師による心臓停止・呼吸停止・脈拍停止・瞳孔散大の診断・宣言が必要とされる死亡に対していう〕

I was thinking a lot about this entry the day Abe was shot, when officially the "心肺停止" lasted for several hours. I can't be sure this entry was the basis for it but I saw his condition referred to as "showing no vital signs" in English-language media and I felt a pang of guilt as I wasn't really sure this was an entirely accurate description (after the 心肺停止 was first announced, he was flown to a hospital and had 30 or so liters of blood pumped into him, before they finally announced his death). 

I'm wondering what other editors think, should maybe sense 2 be reworked into a note on sense 1?

[note="oft. used in media for a death which is yet to be declared by a medical professional"]

Work?
Maybe just one sense with a "lit" translation would be best.

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<s_inf>media euphemism for unconfirmed death</s_inf>
+<s_inf>media term for unconfirmed death</s_inf>

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<misc>&id;</misc>

@@ -18,3 +18,3 @@
-<gloss>act on one's emotions</gloss>
-<gloss>be carried away by one's feelings</gloss>
-<gloss>get (become) emotional</gloss>
+<gloss>to act on one's emotions</gloss>
+<gloss>to be carried away by one's feelings</gloss>
+<gloss>to get emotional</gloss>

OK

Adding ant for the other direction.

@@ -17,0 +17,1 @@
+<xref type="ant" seq="2557400">冷静になる</xref>

Best handled with a cross-reference.

@@ -19,0 +20 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2029090">よ・1</xref>

I am reading from Daijisen that this can be equivalent to the sentence-ending "yo"

GG5, etc.

@@ -21,1 +21,2 @@
-<gloss>hey, hey you</gloss>
+<gloss>hey</gloss>
+<gloss>hey you</gloss>

GG5

Close relative of やいやい but different usage.

OK. I'll strip the verb conjugation code from the 10 entries listed in comment 10 below.

reopen

what a pain.  ok, well i'll approve what you're suggesting and then reopen because there are a ton of entries for this in the queue

@@ -16 +15,0 @@
-<pos>&v1;</pos>

信用できない	305779
信用できる	262320

When "adj-f" first emerged and got described as "noun or verb acting prenominally" I think I had in mind that the verb would either not be conjugating or was conjugated already, as in 得も言われぬ or ああいった. Then along comes 信用できる/信用できない and mucks things up. I'm very tempted to say that if a verb is usually prenominal, don't have a v1/v5x tag. I think that should work, and 信用できない can fend for itself. Of course 食べる doesn't get an "adj-f".
So, I guess I'm back to Marcus' earlier position, and drop the verb tag for these cases.

seems like the adj-f is unneeded.  e.g., 食べるもの means 'things to eat', but we don't mark 食べる or any other verb as adj-f.  i suggest adj-f not be used anywhere that it's tagged as a verb

GG5 examples, e.g. "後になる drop ［lag, trail, fall］ behind 《the others》"

I've checked a lot of examples and can't find support for the "esp. .."

@@ -13 +12,0 @@
-<s_inf>esp. as ～と, 後になったら, etc., to mean "afterwards"</s_inf>
@@ -14,0 +14,2 @@
+<gloss>to fall behind</gloss>
+<gloss>to lag</gloss>

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<gloss>to pass (of time)</gloss>

km
後になる	5192
後になると	1576
後になったら	226
後になるまで	106

useful?

Eiji, GG5 examples. N-grams: 14014

@@ -14 +14,2 @@
-<gloss>to build friendship</gloss>
+<gloss>to build intimacy</gloss>
+<gloss>to deepen a friendship</gloss>

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<gloss>to get acquainted</gloss>

https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=親交を深める

OK, let's use "on" when the gloss is otherwise a bit ambiguous. I'll go through and add them where I think it's needed. Something like:
重箱読み;重箱読(io) [じゅうばこよみ] /(n) (See 湯桶読み) mixed on-kun reading/
is probably OK.

i haven't looked at the other entries, but i agree that "on" could be confusing without the quotation marks.  i think we should standardize on:

"on" reading
  or
on-yomi / on'yomi

temp approve

It might not be the best approach. I just think that "popularly accepted on reading" is somewhat confusing to read.
Are there any alternatives?

Should we be using quotation marks for on and kun for readings? If so there are about 8 other entries containing them.
We don't put other ローマ字 in quotes.

just the causative form of 際立つ.  i don't think it's needed

https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=際立たせる

「村は夜の闇の中に沈みこんで、ひっそりと眠りについている。時折、家や街頭の明かりがポツポツと燈っているけれども、それはむしろ消滅しつつある村の寂しさをきわだたせるだけでしかない。」

gg5, koj

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<gloss>to be worse in one aspect</gloss>
+<gloss>to be a degree worse</gloss>
@@ -20 +20,2 @@
-<gloss>to relent a bit</gloss>
+<gloss>to make a concession</gloss>
+<gloss>to concede a point</gloss>

大辞泉

daijr/s

gg5, eij

gg5, eij

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/沖田浩之

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Okita Hiroyuki (1963.1-1999.3)</gloss>
+<gloss>Hiroyuki Okita (1963.1.7-1999.3.27)</gloss>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Okita Hiroyuki (1963.1-)</gloss>
+<gloss>Okita Hiroyuki (1963.1-1999.3)</gloss>