@@ -9 +9 @@
-<gloss>.. being the case</gloss>
+<gloss>... being the case</gloss>
@@ -11 +11 @@
-<gloss>as might be expected (from ..)</gloss>
+<gloss>as might be expected (from ...)</gloss>

gg5

@@ -15,0 +16,2 @@
+<gloss>to carry out</gloss>
+<gloss>to perform</gloss>

I really don't like "applies to senses 11-14" in a note.

@@ -84 +84 @@
-<s_inf>form (for senses 11-14) : AをBにする</s_inf>
+<s_inf>as AをBにする</s_inf>
@@ -90,0 +91 @@
+<s_inf>as AをBにする</s_inf>
@@ -98,0 +100 @@
+<s_inf>as AをBにする</s_inf>
@@ -106,0 +109 @@
+<s_inf>as AをBにする</s_inf>

I've been waiting for someone else to comment on this. I guess you can go on forever with する, and every reference has a different version. I think I'll just let Luce's amendment go in - it seems useful, although 17 senses is a bit daunting.

these senses from the にする entry were useful. let's resurrect them.

@@ -80,0 +81,29 @@
+<pos>&vs-i;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<s_inf>form (for senses 11-14) : AをBにする</s_inf>
+<gloss>to place, or raise, person A to a post or status B</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&vs-i;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>to transform A to B</gloss>
+<gloss>to make A into B</gloss>
+<gloss>to exchange A for B</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&vs-i;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>to make use of A for B</gloss>
+<gloss>to view A as B</gloss>
+<gloss>to handle A as if it were B</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&vs-i;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>to feel A about B</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>

Makino & Tsutsui DBJG, p 310 "にする".

@@ -48,0 +49 @@
+<s_inf>as 〜にする</s_inf>

@@ -89 +89 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1270190">御・お</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1270190">御</xref>

Just responding to Francis: In the database the xref is quite explicit, but WWWJDIC simply uses text xrefs, so it tries to look up *all* entries starting with 御, of which there are hundreds.
As luck has it, 御/お/ご comes up third in the list.
A rewrite of WWWJDIC could solve this  8-)}

daij

@@ -19,0 +19,1 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -25,0 +26,1 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -31,0 +33,1 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -35,0 +38,1 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -44,0 +48,1 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -50,0 +55,1 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -56,0 +62,1 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -61,0 +68,1 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -67,0 +75,1 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -73,0 +82,1 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -80,0 +90,1 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -86,0 +97,1 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

The link "御 .お" does  not seem to work on my computer. Maybe there should be two links one to "御" and one to "お".

Apologies if I have not done it properly.

Just an x-ref

@@ -85,0 +85,1 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2136890">とする・1</xref>

See below.

I came. I saw. I failed.

でも、いったいなに、おもしろいでしたよ。

[I hope that is right!]

I think the entry is already quite clear.  I don't see why this entry should be 
singled out for addition of romaji, and I really don't see how adding romaji would 
help in any case.

See below.

I appreciate your taking all this trouble over my submission. It is just a pity that the system does not allow you to include Japanese in the glosses.

Just one final thought before you close the discussion down. I know that you do not like using romaji, but would it be intolerable to include it in this case, for example: (e.g. "why in the world? (ittainaze)"), etc.

What you are raising is the issue of having examples of the use of 一体. That 一体なぜ is one such, rather than it being a formal dictionary entry. It's the same in GG5, etc.
In JMdict we are sticking with the appropriate (I think) choice of what actually are headwords, and having examples, such as 一体なぜ, separate. If you look up 一体 in WWWJDIC you'll see the example "一体どこで彼に会ったんだ。 Where on earth did you meet him?". Normally we try and have one example per sense, but I have just flagged "いったいなぜ彼を駅に連れて行ったの？" as well (it will appear in a week, as Tatoeba's downloads are prepared weekly.)

See below.

Thank you for giving the time to explain your stand on this matter. I appreciate that because I am the novice here and I am keen to understand the complexities of the Japanese language. As I slowly work my way through Japanese text, looking for starting points and ending points of the sentence structure, I am motivated to search your site for help. When my initial search criteria does not give me any assistance, I try all sorts of other searches and sometimes I find the answer. In that way, when I have found the answer, I make a submission because I think that it may help another novice on the same route.

As to this submission, it is true that many examples of the Japanese “string of text symbols” can be found in the example sentences in the Tanaka corpus and that is, of course, some help, but they do not necessarily help with the definitive meaning of the particular “string of text symbols”, nor do they specifically help one to discover where a “headword” will start or stop so that individual entries can be analysed. In short, as between Japanese and English it often goes from idiom to idiom.

I think that it is the word “dictionary” in the context of a language like Japanese which is the hub of the problem. In English, expressions like “what on earth”, are no problem because there are three individual words in a string. Each of these words can be looked up. If I look them up in turn, in any order, e.g., "earth" first, I get the individual meanings, but I accept that I do not get a headword in the dictionary which is “what on earth”. However, [popping in to the library on my roaming] if I look up the word “earth” and read what it states, then – for example in Collins English Dictionary – I find one meaning as this: used as an intensifier in such phrases as “what on earth”, “who on earth”, etc.. Now, that matches what is in your site, except that I cannot look up the individual words for “what on earth”, etc., in Japanese; unless I already know them.

In the Japanese dictionary,“shogakukan”, it carries a link between the headwords “いったいぜんたい” and “いったい”. Likewise on your site, namely:-

一体全体; いったい全体 【いったいぜんたい】 (adv) (emph. form of 一体) ... the heck (e.g. "what the heck?"); ... in the world (e.g. "why in the world?"); ... on earth (e.g. "who on earth?")

However, in shogakukan it gives more. Under the headword “いったい” it gives “一体なぜ....” with the meaning “Why on earth ….”. Thus, like the English dictionary, with that clue, I can look up “なぜ” and see what it means. Also, under the headword “いったいぜんたい” it gives “一体全体どうした....” with a meaning of “What on earth....”, again, if necessary, I can look up “どうした” for its meaning.

My only point is this: that you have taken one helpful step on the road, namely: as in the English dictionary as noted above, by giving English meanings associated with the headword. However, I will not say, “What on earth stops you from including the “いったいなに”, “いったいなせ”, etc.” because I can imagine that a line has to be drawn somewhere; and, of course, you have also explained the mechanics of the system which prevent a simple inclusion under the main “headword”. However, the inclusion of the other expressions individually, which have already been included in English by description, would make it clear to the novice. In addition, it would even make clearer the usage in the helpful sentences in the Tanaka corpus.

I really have to agree with Rene. I think this has been pushed as far as it can go.

I still don't understand why things like いったいなに need to be added.  It's 
just standard use of an adverb.  I would never expect "why on earth" to appear 
in an English-English dictionary, nor いったいなに in a Japanese-Japanese 
dictionary, so why add it to this Japanese-English dictionary itself?  There are 
plenty of example sentences in the Tanaka corpus that give this exact 
example.  I'm not even convinced that 「いったいなに」 gets the parsing of the 
sentence correct in something like 「君は一体何を言おうとしているのか。」I'd 
guess that 一体 applies to 何を言おうとしているのか, not just to 何.

See below.

Thank you for posing that as a question.

To have an expert state the obvious is the basic dream of the novice who does not understand. Unfortunately, the novice usually gets the so called “obvious” from the non-expert; in short, most of the ordinary people who actually speak the language in question. In my own tongue [English], would I believe the general speaker of my tongue when I am told the meaning of some expression? Fortunately, when the language is used in a general context, understanding is easier for the native speaker. However, when the language is used in a specific context of some importance, we often have the great brains of the courtrooms arguing over the meaning.

I have come to regard your site as the living proof of the benefit of having your experts holding discussion over the meaning and understanding of the Japanese language. Moreover, you are not tied to the long delays of the printed published word, e.g., like the OED with 20 odd volumes. When I last exchanged a note with the editors on the meaning of the word “adversarial” and its first usage, they said that my comment was timely because they were just about to start again at “A” and again work their way through to “Z”. The cycle takes years to complete. However, as I understand it, I am sure that they revel in stating the obvious, so much so, that the big OED is, in my view, the dictionary where every beginner should start; unfortunately, the shear size is is the frightener for the novice. 

With your site, sized impedes no one because the overall size is not so obvious to anyone, save those who have created it. So, for my part, to the extent which time and facilities allow you to state the obvious, every novice who searches will applaud your work with equal measure.

Those verb conjugations are machine-generated, and only appear in WWWJDIC. 
Yes, I could put things like:
一体何;一体なに [いったいなに] /(exp) (See 一体)/
but isn't it just stating the obvious? There are a heap of Japanese words (全然, 全部, 本当, etc.) which do similar things.

See below.

I think that I am beginning to understand the situation a little better. Upon reading your comments, I am wondering whether you could deal with the Japanese in a similar manner as you do with various verb endings, for example: すれば seeする. Thus, we would get an entry which reads: 一体なに (いったいなに) see 一体, etc. for each of the variables. In this way, when someone searches for “一体なに”, they will find what they are looking for and then they can click on the cross-reference and find themselves reading your main explanations under “一体” and the result would be clear to most if not all.
I hope that is helpful.

The reason being that legacy programs using the old EDICT format can't cope with Japanese in glosses. That's part of the reason for the <<notes>>.
I'm going to reverse Rene's ordering. The Tanaka sentences have 133 examples for 一体/いったい and 132 of them are for the sense we are discussing. I'd have to renumber all the sense tags (can be done), but really with this sense dominating in modern Japanese, it should be first, regardless of what the 国語s say.
I'm also changing the "exemplar" example in WWWJDIC to a better one. And I'm adding an example sentence for 一体に.

@@ -16,0 +16,7 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
+<s_inf>before an interrogative, forms an emphatic question</s_inf>
+<gloss>...the heck (e.g. "what the heck?")</gloss>
+<gloss>...in the world (e.g. "why in the world?")</gloss>
+<gloss>...on earth (e.g. "who on earth?")</gloss>
+</sense>
@@ -37,7 +44,0 @@
-<sense>
-<pos>&adv;</pos>
-<s_inf>before an interrogative, forms an emphatic question</s_inf>
-<gloss>...the heck (e.g. "what the heck?")</gloss>
-<gloss>...in the world (e.g. "why in the world?")</gloss>
-<gloss>...on earth (e.g. "who on earth?")</gloss>
-</sense>

Japanese cannot be added to glosses.

See below.

That looks good, but would it not be possible to include the Japanese reading for each "e.g" [e.g. "what the heck?" (一体なに))] so that what is clear to the expert would also be clear to the novice?

This was in response to Francis's comment:
I can see where you are coming from in your comment "I've come round to the view that just one of quite a lot of 一体 + XXX constructions" in respect of my rejected submission for "一体なせ".
In view of that, I am wondering if this main entry could have the addition of an explanation like the following:-
gives the expressions like:...the heck, …the world, ...on earth, and followed by various question words, like, なに,　なせ,　どれ, in order to give (e.g. "what the heck?"); (e.g. "why in the world?"); (e.g. "who on earth?")
Something like that may help the novice who is searching for such expressions.

some kind of note is fine with me, although i think the glosses as given are 
sufficiently obvious.  but if it's included, i think the senses should be swapped 
so that it doesn't look like the note applies to the whole word.  the new ordering 
matches the sense ordering of kokugo dictionaries and progressive waei.  
hopefully that wouldn't mess with paul's stuff too much

@@ -16,7 +16,0 @@
-<sense>
-<pos>&adv;</pos>
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<gloss>...the heck (e.g. "what the heck?")</gloss>
-<gloss>...in the world (e.g. "why in the world?")</gloss>
-<gloss>...on earth (e.g. "who on earth?")</gloss>
-</sense>
@@ -39,1 +32,1 @@
-<pos>&adv;</pos>
+<pos>&n-adv;</pos>
@@ -44,0 +37,7 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
+<s_inf>before an interrogative, forms an emphatic question</s_inf>
+<gloss>...the heck (e.g. "what the heck?")</gloss>
+<gloss>...in the world (e.g. "why in the world?")</gloss>
+<gloss>...on earth (e.g. "who on earth?")</gloss>
+</sense>

I'd prefer stripping the articles from the other senses.

aligning with examples in other senses

@@ -79,4 +79,4 @@
-<gloss>to turn on (engine, radio, etc.)</gloss>
-<gloss>to set (dial, alarm clock, etc.)</gloss>
-<gloss>to put on (DVD, song, etc.)</gloss>
-<gloss>to use (device, implement, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>to turn on (an engine, radio, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>to set (a dial, alarm clock, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>to put on (a DVD, song, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>to use (a device, implement, etc.)</gloss>

Converting somebody to someone
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -89 +89 @@
-<gloss>to cause (somebody inconvenience, trouble, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>to cause (someone inconvenience, trouble, etc.)</gloss>

かける	8289469
掛ける	942767
懸ける	67775

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

I think it's more than just turning it on. I'll try and improve it.

@@ -78,4 +78,4 @@
-<gloss>to turn on (an engine, radio, etc.)</gloss>
-<gloss>to set (a dial, an alarm clock, etc.)</gloss>
-<gloss>to put on (a DVD, a song, etc.)</gloss>
-<gloss>to make a tool work</gloss>
+<gloss>to turn on (engine, radio, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>to set (dial, alarm clock, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>to put on (DVD, song, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>to use (device, implement, etc.)</gloss>

"to make a tool work" sounds awfully weird to me. Isn't the vacuuming covered by "to turn on (a machine)"?

Quiet. Closing.

GG5 (sense 3): 〔道具を機能させる･道具で処理する･機能をセットする･契約して掛け金を払う〕

Explains the 掃除機をかける usage.

@@ -80,0 +81 @@
+<gloss>to make a tool work</gloss>

@@ -93,0 +94 @@
+<field>&math;</field>

Anyone who reads as far as sense 25 is welcome to it.

Not sure this part of the note is needed (isn't it covered by the glosses?)

@@ -214 +214 @@
-<s_inf>after -masu stem of verb; indicates (verb) is being directed to someone</s_inf>
+<s_inf>after -masu stem of verb; indicates an action is being directed to someone</s_inf>

My unfavourate entry.

I prefer "also as X" over "also X"

@@ -118 +118 @@
-<s_inf>also 繋ける</s_inf>
+<s_inf>also as 繋ける</s_inf>

For consistency,

@@ -72 +72 @@
-<gloss>to throw (e.g. water) onto somebody</gloss>
+<gloss>to throw (e.g. water) onto</gloss>

lum

@@ -24 +24 @@
-<gloss>to hang up (e.g. a picture on the wall)</gloss>
+<gloss>to hang up (e.g. a coat, a picture on the wall)</gloss>
@@ -36,0 +37,2 @@
+<gloss>to lay</gloss>
+<gloss>to spread</gloss>

Better? An actual gloss.

@@ -212,2 +212,4 @@
-<s_inf>after -masu stem of verb</s_inf>
-<gloss>indicates (verb) is being directed to (someone)</gloss>
+<s_inf>after -masu stem of verb; indicates (verb) is being directed to someone</s_inf>
+<gloss>to address (someone)</gloss>
+<gloss>to direct (something, to someone)</gloss>
+<gloss>to do (something, to someone)</gloss>

I'll commit this now. I've spent a few hours going over the 291 sentences linked to this entry. They were a mess, as Paul Blay's original alignment with senses has been mangled by subsequent updates. I'll now embark on realigning them, which is quite a task.

restored lost prio tags

@@ -14,0 +15,3 @@
+<re_pri>ichi1</re_pri>
+<re_pri>news1</re_pri>
+<re_pri>nf20</re_pri>

To make this easier for whomever ends up checking this: 
except changing the order around, the only edits I made 
were
1) adding more glosses to sense ① (to hang)
2) adding more glosses ② "to cover"
3) changing the ⑤ "to take time/money" to "to spend 
time/money"
4) adding more glosses to ⑦ "to turn on"
5) adding more glosses to ⑧ "to cause"
6) adding a qualifier to ⑨ "to multiply"
7) adding more glosses to ⑪　"to sit"

(I think that covers it)

gg5 sense order
1. hang on (from), suspend
2. splash, pour (water) on, sprinkle. cover; wrap
3. start an engine, turn on radio, put on the brakes, 
lock a door, button up a coat et
4. snare, trap, net
5. spend (time), spend (money), use (time); take (time), 
put in (an effort)
6. cause (somebody) (trouble/inconvenience)
7. apply, administer, extend, offer
8. to offer a prayer, make a petition for
9. take sb (to trial), put sb to torture
10. stage; screen; put on; present
11. kanrendukeru, kakemochi suru, (play on words)
12. multiply
_daijs
(only bothered with the first few)
1 (㋐㋑㋒) to hang, to hoist
2 (㋐㋑) to put (a pot) (in contact with fire, e.g. on 
the stove); to weigh 
3. (㋐㋑㋒㋓) (架ける)to suspend between two points , to 
tie (eg a ribbon) around something, to put on a play)

_
(only bothered with the first few)
daijr: ❶   物をほかの物に取り付ける (with lots of 
subsenses: to hang; to fasten (something to a wall or 
high place, etc.), to hoist, put a pot on the fire, to 
weigh, to sit, to put on (glasses);to hang up (someone 
on a cross etc. as a punishment (crucifixion))
❷  上方から物を置く。 (with 2 subsenses: to cover 
something; to put something on top of something else (so 
that it's covered), and to pour/sprinkle (液体や粉末)
_____
I went through the 124 of the most recent tweets for "掛
ける" (not かける,かけて,etc. - just "掛ける"). I skipped 
compound verbs like 喋りかける etc. when they showed up 
(twitter automatically filtered most of them out)
the results were something like this:
36 声を掛ける、掛ける言葉　話を掛ける
9 迷惑を掛ける,心配を掛ける 
8  毛布を掛ける (all 8 spec. 毛布)
6  電話掛ける LINEで（電話を）掛ける
6  眼鏡・サングラスを掛ける
5  multiply
5  to pour (liquid on something) 
5  to hang (something on something)
4  呪いを掛ける 魔法をかける　催眠を掛ける
3  鍵かける
2  金を掛ける
and then a whole lot of other stuff that's more abstract 
or spread out. I'd say there's around 20-25 that could 
be translated as "put/put on" (including "毛布を掛ける" 
and "眼鏡をかける") but they still span across several of 
these senses.
There's of course several issues with this data but it's 
still somewhat useful.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1N2YWtP36eZvUkMTh
VRMURjOv4n_Zhtkj3OzDYYEUndQ/

Everybody's favorite entry.
_
I've changed the order of the senses while looking at 
gg5 and daij, twitter usage, while also giving (a 
little) consideration to make the word easier to 
understand for beginners. Sorry for wreaking havoc on 
the example sentences, but I think it had to be done 
eventually anyway. I have not added any new senses 
(though there's plenty of add) and I only added more 
glosses to a few of them. There's several that I think 
would still need editing/expansion. "apply (an 
insurance)" esp. sticks out as one that needs to be 
expanded.
_
掛ける is a really hard word to get to grips with for 
beginners, because there are so many meanings. One 
English gloss that mostly covers several of them well 
enough is "to put (on)". I think we'd make word easier 
to wrap their heads around if we pushed "put" up to the 
top. 
_
声を掛ける、話を掛ける was by far the most common usage of 
"掛ける" (in that particular surface form) on twitter. 
GG5 has this  in the middle and towards the bottom of "7 
【働きかける】 apply; administer; 【相手に作用を及ばす】 
extend; offer". daijs has "声を掛ける" in subsense ㋑ of 
sense 10, together with 電話を掛ける: "㋑送って相手に届かせ
る。「電話を―・ける」「言葉を―・ける」". daijr has it in a 
sub-subsense: "❸他にある作用を与える。他に影響を及ぼす。③  
言葉などによる働きかけをする。㋐  言葉を人に向けて発する。 
「部下に言葉を－・ける」 「生徒に声を－・ける」"
I haven't added it anywhere because it's such a headache 
and most (if not all) of the usage should be covered by 
声を掛ける, but it'd be great if somebody else would take 
the plunge. It should probably be a new sense, is my 
thinking.
_
Added "(arithmetic operation)" to "multiply" because it 
doesn't mean "the rabbits multiplied in the next few 
days", but it's maybe a little unsightly.
_
I changed "to take time/money" to "to spend" 
_
There are no xrefs to 掛ける - instead, 掛ける points to 
the various なんとかを掛ける entries. Shouldn't it be the 
other way around? Maybe that's another topic for the 
mailing list - how we're using the xrefs.

@@ -21 +21,3 @@
-<gloss>to hang (e.g. picture)</gloss>
+<gloss>to hang up (e.g. a picture on the wall)</gloss>
+<gloss>to let hang</gloss>
+<gloss>to suspend (from)</gloss>
@@ -28,31 +30,4 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1876640">腰を掛ける</xref>
-<misc>&uk;</misc>
-<gloss>to sit</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&v1;</pos>
-<pos>&vt;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="1884450">時間を掛ける</xref>
-<misc>&uk;</misc>
-<gloss>to take (time, money)</gloss>
-<gloss>to expend (money, time, etc.)</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&v1;</pos>
-<pos>&vt;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="1896610">電話を掛ける</xref>
-<misc>&uk;</misc>
-<gloss>to make (a call)</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&v1;</pos>
-<pos>&vt;</pos>
-<misc>&uk;</misc>
-<gloss>to multiply</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&v1;</pos>
-<pos>&vt;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="1260500">鍵を掛ける</xref>
-<misc>&uk;</misc>
-<gloss>to secure (e.g. lock)</gloss>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>to put on (e.g. a blanket)</gloss>
+<gloss>to put on top of</gloss>
+<gloss>to cover</gloss>
@@ -71,2 +46,30 @@
-<misc>&uk;</misc>
-<gloss>to cover</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1896610">電話を掛ける</xref>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>to make (a call)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1884450">時間を掛ける</xref>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>to spend (time, money)</gloss>
+<gloss>to expend</gloss>
+<gloss>to use</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2211750">塩をかける</xref>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>to pour (liquid) onto</gloss>
+<gloss>to sprinkle (powder or spices) onto</gloss>
+<gloss>to splash</gloss>
+<gloss>to throw (e.g. water) onto somebody</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>to turn on (an engine, radio, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>to set (a dial, an alarm clock, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>to put on (a DVD, a song, etc.)</gloss>
@@ -79,27 +82,26 @@
-<gloss>to burden someone</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&v1;</pos>
-<pos>&vt;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="1908300">保険を掛ける</xref>
-<misc>&uk;</misc>
-<gloss>to apply (insurance)</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&v1;</pos>
-<pos>&vt;</pos>
-<misc>&uk;</misc>
-<gloss>to turn on (an engine, etc.)</gloss>
-<gloss>to set (a dial, an alarm clock, etc.)</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&v1;</pos>
-<pos>&vt;</pos>
-<misc>&uk;</misc>
-<gloss>to put an effect (spell, anaesthetic, etc.) on</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&v1;</pos>
-<pos>&vt;</pos>
-<misc>&uk;</misc>
-<gloss>to hold an emotion for (pity, hope, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>to cause (somebody inconvenience, trouble, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>to burden (someone)</gloss>
+<gloss>to impose</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>to multiply (arithmetic operation)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1260500">鍵を掛ける</xref>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>to secure (e.g. lock)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1876640">腰を掛ける</xref>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>to take a seat</gloss>
+<gloss>to sit</gloss>
+<gloss>to rest (something on something else)</gloss>
+<gloss>to support (something on something else)</gloss>
@@ -113,46 +114,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&v1;</pos>
-<pos>&vt;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="2211750">塩をかける</xref>
-<misc>&uk;</misc>
-<gloss>to pour (or sprinkle, spray, etc.) onto</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&v1;</pos>
-<pos>&vt;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="2211350">裁判に掛ける</xref>
-<misc>&uk;</misc>
-<gloss>to argue (in court)</gloss>
-<gloss>to deliberate (in a meeting)</gloss>
-<gloss>to present (e.g. idea to a conference, etc.)</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&v1;</pos>
-<pos>&vt;</pos>
-<misc>&uk;</misc>
-<gloss>to increase further</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&v1;</pos>
-<pos>&vt;</pos>
-<misc>&uk;</misc>
-<gloss>to catch (in a trap, etc.)</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&v1;</pos>
-<pos>&vt;</pos>
-<misc>&uk;</misc>
-<gloss>to set atop</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&v1;</pos>
-<pos>&vt;</pos>
-<misc>&uk;</misc>
-<gloss>to erect (a makeshift building)</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&v1;</pos>
-<pos>&vt;</pos>
-<misc>&uk;</misc>
-<gloss>to hold (a play, festival, etc.)</gloss>
@@ -173,0 +130,58 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>to put an effect (spell, anaesthetic, etc.) on</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>to hold (a play, festival, etc.)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>to hold an emotion for (pity, hope, etc.)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2211350">裁判に掛ける</xref>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>to argue (in court)</gloss>
+<gloss>to deliberate (in a meeting)</gloss>
+<gloss>to present (e.g. idea to a conference, etc.)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>to increase further</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>to catch (in a trap, etc.)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>to set atop</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>to erect (a makeshift building)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1908300">保険を掛ける</xref>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>to apply (insurance)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

This term makes me exhausted.

Maybe better?

@@ -174,2 +174,7 @@
-<misc>&uk;</misc>
-<gloss>to pun</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1821300">掛詞</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1821300">掛詞</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1821300">掛詞</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1821300">掛詞</xref>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>to pun (on a word)</gloss>
+<gloss>to use (a word) as a pivot word</gloss>

daijs
"22 同音を利用して一つの語句に二つの意味を持たせる。掛け詞にす
る。「和歌では多く『海松布(みるめ)』に『見る目』を―・けて用いら
れる」"
_
daijr:
❿  言葉と言葉に関連を持たせる。
①  ある語句と他の語句との間に意味関係や文法関係をもたせる。 「関
係代名詞を名詞句に－・ける」
②  掛け言葉を言う。 「『長雨』を『眺め』に－・ける」
③  かこつける。意味づける。 「妹が名に－・けたる桜／万葉集 
3787」

also added "to wear" to the "put on glasses" sense

@@ -15,3 +14,0 @@
-<re_pri>ichi1</re_pri>
-<re_pri>news1</re_pri>
-<re_pri>nf20</re_pri>
@@ -68,0 +66 @@
+<gloss>to wear (a necklace, etc.)</gloss>
@@ -173,0 +172,7 @@
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>to pun</gloss>
+<gloss>to play on words</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>

we do not edit the example sentences.  please submit to the tatoeba project

Example sentence "ボブとメアリーはテープレコーダーをかけます, Bob and Mary play the recorder" seems to suffer from a misunderstanding about the type of "recorder" being referred to. The English sentence presumably refers to the musical instrument.

thanks

KM ngrams:
絵をかける	133
絵を掛ける	41
腰をかける	496
腰を掛ける	179
時間をかける	4334
時間を掛ける	391
電話をかける	10394
電話を掛ける	1114
鍵をかける	1330
鍵を掛ける	332
眼鏡をかける	784
眼鏡を掛ける	147
迷惑をかける	12342
迷惑を掛ける	1444
保険をかける	536
保険を掛ける	178
塩をかける	311
塩を掛ける	11
裁判にかける	630
裁判に掛ける	32

Seems that all senses are [uk].

not sure if it's actually [uk], but it's [uk]ish.

Sorry, but I don't think the n-grams are misleading at all in such cases. 複合動詞 are usually treated as a single morpheme and hence as a 1-gram by the good morphological analyzers. I just checked 出かける in both MeCab/Unidic and Chasen/IPADIC and in both cases it was left as a single morpheme. Unidic has a huge collection of composed 複合動詞, many of which have 掛ける/かける as the V2 component. I think the actual results leading to flagging this particular かける as "uk" are pretty solid.

N-grams are misleading in this case. "かける" is part of words like "出かける" where it's a modifying verb. By itself it's usually written as "掛ける". At least in the specific senses like "multiply".

I think that's OK. Quite hard to test, and refs are a bit varied. 
かける in all its forms is a horror.

n-grams
掛ける	40892
懸ける	1860
かける	306358

I think this is one of those entries where we can safely put [uk] on every sense
I'd also like to reorder these senses a bit so that the expressions come last, but that'd wreak havoc with the examples I think

@@ -22,0 +23 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -30,0 +32 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -36,0 +39 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -43,0 +47 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -48,0 +53 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -54,0 +60 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -60,0 +67 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -65,0 +73 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -71,0 +80 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -77,0 +87 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -82,0 +93 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -88,0 +100 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -93,0 +106 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -98,0 +112 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -105,0 +120 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -111,0 +127 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -118,0 +135 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -123,0 +141 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -128,0 +147 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -133,0 +153 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -138,0 +159 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -144,0 +166 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -154,0 +177 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -163,0 +187 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

@@ -154,0 +154,1 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1562300">話し掛ける・2</xref>

moving suffix sense 3 to end with the other one

@@ -32,7 +32,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&aux-v;</pos>
-<pos>&v1;</pos>
-<gloss>to be partway (verb)</gloss>
-<gloss>to begin (but not complete)</gloss>
-<gloss>to be about to ...</gloss>
@@ -159,1 +152,10 @@
-<pos>&aux-v;</pos>
+<pos>&suf;</pos>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
+<s_inf>after -masu stem of verb</s_inf>
+<gloss>to be partway doing ...</gloss>
+<gloss>to begin (but not complete) ...</gloss>
+<gloss>to be about to ...</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&suf;</pos>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>

->note

@@ -161,1 +161,2 @@
-<gloss>(after -masu stem of verb) indicates (verb) is being directed to (someone)</gloss>
+<s_inf>after -masu stem of verb</s_inf>
+<gloss>indicates (verb) is being directed to (someone)</gloss>

OK

I think this would be more useful here with a reference to 賭ける than as a note in 賭ける, so that people looking up 掛ける or 懸ける will find this meaning.

@@ -149,0 +149,10 @@
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1444840">賭ける・かける</xref>
+<gloss>to wager</gloss>
+<gloss>to bet</gloss>
+<gloss>to risk</gloss>
+<gloss>to stake</gloss>
+<gloss>to gamble</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>

daij, prog

I may take a longer look at the daij entries for this later and see if anything needs to be added, but for now, mainly correcting part-of-speech.

@@ -38,0 +38,1 @@
+<gloss>to be about to ...</gloss>
@@ -40,1 +41,0 @@
-<pos>&aux-v;</pos>
@@ -42,0 +42,1 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
@@ -47,1 +48,0 @@
-<pos>&aux-v;</pos>
@@ -49,0 +49,1 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
@@ -53,1 +54,0 @@
-<pos>&aux-v;</pos>
@@ -55,0 +55,1 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
@@ -58,1 +59,0 @@
-<pos>&aux-v;</pos>
@@ -60,0 +60,1 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
@@ -64,1 +65,0 @@
-<pos>&aux-v;</pos>
@@ -66,0 +66,1 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
@@ -70,1 +71,0 @@
-<pos>&aux-v;</pos>
@@ -72,0 +72,1 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
@@ -75,1 +76,0 @@
-<pos>&aux-v;</pos>
@@ -77,0 +77,1 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
@@ -81,1 +82,0 @@
-<pos>&aux-v;</pos>
@@ -83,0 +83,1 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
@@ -87,1 +88,0 @@
-<pos>&aux-v;</pos>
@@ -89,0 +89,1 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
@@ -93,1 +94,0 @@
-<pos>&aux-v;</pos>
@@ -95,0 +95,1 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
@@ -98,1 +99,0 @@
-<pos>&aux-v;</pos>
@@ -100,0 +100,1 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
@@ -103,1 +104,0 @@
-<pos>&aux-v;</pos>
@@ -105,0 +105,1 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
@@ -109,1 +110,0 @@
-<pos>&aux-v;</pos>
@@ -111,0 +111,1 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
@@ -115,1 +116,0 @@
-<pos>&aux-v;</pos>
@@ -117,0 +117,1 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
@@ -123,1 +124,0 @@
-<pos>&aux-v;</pos>
@@ -125,0 +125,1 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
@@ -128,1 +129,0 @@
-<pos>&aux-v;</pos>
@@ -130,0 +130,1 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
@@ -133,1 +134,0 @@
-<pos>&aux-v;</pos>
@@ -135,0 +135,1 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
@@ -138,1 +139,0 @@
-<pos>&aux-v;</pos>
@@ -140,0 +140,1 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
@@ -143,1 +144,0 @@
-<pos>&aux-v;</pos>
@@ -145,0 +145,1 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

G n-grams:
 間に合う	1354759
 間にあう	  19173
 まに合う	    312
 まにあう	  20208
Tanaka

@@ -11,0 +12,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>まに合う</keb>

djr; djs; prog3e; kenkyu中

The former senses 3 and 4 are one and the same, it seems to me.

While the new sense 4 is close to sense 1, I thought it has a 
negative connotation whereas the latter is neutral. Plus, 
according to djr/djs, it's usually is used in passive form when 
used in sense 4.

@@ -23 +22,0 @@
-<gloss>to question</gloss>
@@ -29 +28 @@
-<gloss>to charge (i.e. with a crime)</gloss>
+<gloss>to charge (e.g. with a crime)</gloss>
@@ -35 +34,3 @@
-<gloss>to care (about)</gloss>
+<s_inf>used in neg. form</s_inf>
+<gloss>without regard to</gloss>
+<gloss>to not matter</gloss>
@@ -40 +41,4 @@
-<gloss>without regard to (with negative verb)</gloss>
+<s_inf>usually in passive form</s_inf>
+<gloss>to call into question</gloss>
+<gloss>to doubt</gloss>
+<gloss>to question</gloss>

http://komonjyo.net/souroujiten.html

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<misc>&arch;</misc>

http://komonjyo.net/souroujiten.html

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<misc>&arch;</misc>

Entry created

I don't think sense 1 needs to have the English infinitive form as a translation. I felt the previous "becomes; will become; turns out" worked quite well. It's an expression; not a verb per se.

@@ -16,3 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>becomes</gloss>
-<gloss>will become</gloss>
-<gloss>turns out</gloss>
+<gloss>to become</gloss>
+<gloss>to turn out (to be)</gloss>

G n-grams:
 になる	163528095
 に成る	   292705
4 examples of に成る in Tatoeba

@@ -3,0 +4,4 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>に成る</keb>
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
+</k_ele>
@@ -10,0 +15 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -18,0 +24 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+<pos>&v5r;</pos>
@@ -15,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&v5r;</pos>

Agree with "exp". I think it's useful for beginners, although it rapidly becomes second nature to use it.
I see リーダーズ+プラス uses it as the Japanese gloss for the English suffixes "-en" and "ify".

1) i have no idea what sense one is about.  should it be formatted as "to ..."?  is it necessary/helpful at all?
2) this is not a suffix
3) i'm not sure this entry serves a purpose.  as mentioned above, it seems to be covered perfectly by the entry for なる.  i'd consider deleting it

@@ -9,1 +9,1 @@
-<pos>&suf;</pos>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
@@ -15,1 +15,1 @@
-<pos>&suf;</pos>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>

that note is far too long and convoluted.  taking the one from なる as you recommended

@@ -16,1 +16,3 @@
-<gloss>(In the forms of お+masu-stem+になる, ご+noun+になる this becomes the grammatical form creating an honorific verbal expression for) to do</gloss>
+<misc>&hon;</misc>
+<s_inf>as お+masu-stem+になる, ご+noun+になる, etc.</s_inf>
+<gloss>to do</gloss>

See below.

As a novice, I prefer the explanation under the "なる 《成る(P); 為る》" entry for the meaning of [2], ie, as follows:-

(8) (hon) (as お+masu-stem+になる, ご+noun+になる, etc.) to do ...;

Either way, I think the novice would like the same explanation form for both entries.

@@ -16,1 +16,1 @@
-<gloss>(with "o" and masu-stem of verb) grammatical form creating an honorific verbal expression</gloss>
+<gloss>(In the forms of お+masu-stem+になる, ご+noun+になる this becomes the grammatical form creating an honorific verbal expression for) to do</gloss>

Entry created

Entry created

Splitting out passive from honorific.

@@ -13,0 +14,6 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<s_inf>passive form of the verb する</s_inf>
+<gloss>to be done (to someone)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
@@ -16 +22 @@
-<s_inf>honorific or passive form of the verb する</s_inf>
+<s_inf>honorific form of the verb する</s_inf>

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<gloss>to be doing</gloss>

@@ -16 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>honorific or passive form of the verb "suru"</gloss>
+<s_inf>honorific or passive form of the verb する</s_inf>
+<gloss>to do</gloss>

G n-grams:
 される	100635305
 為れる	     1080

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -8,0 +10 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

Just one sense of xref is enough.

@@ -12,2 +12,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1157170">為る・する</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1157170">為る・する</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1157170">為る・する・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1157170">為る・する・1</xref>

Entry created

That makes sense to me.
But I wasn't sure that's how things are done in EDICT.

i'm not sure we need umpteen different forms of this
i'd be happy with entries just for 空気を読む and maybe also 空気が読めない.  the others can go, i think

Google n-gram counts
* 空気を読む: 37959
空気が読める: 11009
* 空気を読めない: 21207
* 空気読めない: 64576
空気が読めない: 48832
場の空気を読めない: 3123
場の空気が読めない: 4782
場の空気読めない: 590
EDICT has several of these related expressions (the ones with asterisks)
but 空気が読めない is a relatively common form that isn't in EDICT.

Making the gloss match the POS.

@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@
+<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
@@ -13,2 +14,2 @@
-<gloss>to be unable to read the situation</gloss>
-<gloss>to be unable to pick up on the mood of a conversation (e.g. A and B are complaining about C, and D joins the conversation praising C)</gloss>
+<gloss>unable to read the situation</gloss>
+<gloss>unable to pick up on the mood of a conversation (e.g. A and B are complaining about C, and D joins the conversation praising C)</gloss>

Entry created

daijr/s

I don't think "initials" makes sense in the context of Japanese (unless we add "romanization of").
Plenty of KYな examples on Twitter. Also refers to the person.
ケイーワイ surely isn't right?

@@ -11,3 +10,0 @@
-<reb>ケイーワイ</reb>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
@@ -16,0 +14 @@
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
@@ -18,0 +17 @@
+<misc>&sl;</misc>
@@ -20,3 +19,4 @@
-<s_inf>from the initials of 空気（が）読めない</s_inf>
-<gloss>being unable to read the situation</gloss>
-<gloss>being unable to pick up on the mood of a conversation</gloss>
+<s_inf>from 空気 (kūki) が読めない (yomenai)</s_inf>
+<gloss>unable to read the situation</gloss>
+<gloss>unable to pick up on the mood of a conversation</gloss>
+<gloss>person who is unable to read the room</gloss>
@@ -27 +27 @@
-<s_inf>from the initials of 危険 and 予知</s_inf>
+<s_inf>from 危険 (kiken) and 予知 (yochi)</s_inf>

https://kotobank.jp/word/ケーワイ-2121734
https://kotobank.jp/word/KYT-671128
https://kotobank.jp/jaesword/危険 危険を予知する｜prevenir el peligro (to prevent danger)

@@ -22,0 +23,6 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<s_inf>from the initials of 危険 and 予知</s_inf>
+<gloss>danger prevention (e.g. in the workplace)</gloss>

@@ -18 +18,3 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2406750">空気読めない</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2796070">空気が読めない</xref>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<s_inf>from the initials of 空気（が）読めない</s_inf>

I don't think the example is very helpful.

@@ -20 +20 @@
-<gloss>being unable to pick up on the mood of a conversation (e.g. A and B are complaining about C, and D joins the conversation praising C)</gloss>
+<gloss>being unable to pick up on the mood of a conversation</gloss>

Aligning glosses, merging in 2406770.

@@ -13,0 +13,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ケイワイ</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -18,0 +21,1 @@
+<gloss>being unable to pick up on the mood of a conversation (e.g. A and B are complaining about C, and D joins the conversation praising C)</gloss>

Entry created

@@ -24,0 +24,5 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<gloss>cherry blossom blooming</gloss>
+<gloss>cherry blossom falling</gloss>
+</sense>

i think that would make sense

Reopen for comments. I see Google images has squillions of pictures of cherry blossom for both this and 桜咲く. Should there be a second pair of glosses for "cherry blossom blooming/cherry blossom falling"?

@@ -20,0 +20,1 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2525060">桜咲く</xref>

Entry created

english wiki

meant nothing to me and seemed like ちょくやく without an explanation

@@ -11,0 +11,1 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
@@ -12,1 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>group of death (in a sport championship)</gloss>
+<gloss>group of death</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">highly competitive group containing too many strong competitors to advance to the next round of a tournament</gloss>

http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/死の組

see comments on 2406750

Dunno. Seems a bit obvious.

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>結婚出来る年齢</keb>

km
結婚できる年齢	73
婚姻適齢	72
https://www.sankei.com/life/news/170203/lif1702030007-n1.html
"成人年齢を２０歳から１８歳に引き下げる民法改正案に、結婚できる年齢（婚姻適齢）を男女とも「１８歳以上」に統一する規定が盛り込まれているこ
とが２日、政府関係者への取材で分かった。"

Worth including?