Just noting that the second "transitive" in my previous comment should be "intransitive".

Thanks. I need to emphasize yet again the requirement for reasons to be given, especially in anonymous edits.

gg5, prog, wisdom, daij
っ放し	305,058		
っぱなし	3,655,134

DIJG says that when the preceding verb is transitive, っぱなし "means that someone does something to X and leaves X as it is without putting it back to its original state, which is not the proper way." When the preceding verb is transitive, っぱなし "means that something or something keeps doing something."
Prog and wisdom split along these lines.
Dropping spec1 from the kanji form.

@@ -6 +5,0 @@
-<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -15 +14,9 @@
-<s_inf>negative nuance, with the state being improper, unpleasant, etc.</s_inf>
+<s_inf>after the -masu stem of a verb; indicates that something is left in an improper state</s_inf>
+<gloss>leaving (on, open, unfinished, etc.)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&suf;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<s_inf>after the -masu stem of a verb</s_inf>
+<gloss>(doing) continuously</gloss>
+<gloss>constantly</gloss>
@@ -17,3 +23,0 @@
-<gloss>have been ...-ing</gloss>
-<gloss>leaving (something) on</gloss>
-<gloss>leaving (something) still in use</gloss>

漬けっぱなし is obviously not negative so "oft." makes sense. Also note is too long and clumsy and goes into too much detail

Need a case for an edit like that. 
I agree about the reading.

@@ -12,3 +11,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>っはなし</reb>
-</r_ele>
@@ -18 +15 @@
-<s_inf>oft. negative nuance</s_inf>
+<s_inf>negative nuance, with the state being improper, unpleasant, etc.</s_inf>

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<gloss>ignoring (somebody)</gloss>
+<gloss>ignoring (someone)</gloss>

Meikyo

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

OK. Leave as it is.

* both mention it but end with "という"

トライして	454248

Maybe

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

meikyo has vi only. maybe vt too?


をトライして	10346
にトライして	87754

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

gg5, daij

Added sense.

@@ -11,0 +12,6 @@
+<gloss>attempt</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<field>&sports;</field>
+<gloss>try (rugby)</gloss>

koj, prog

@@ -36,0 +37,8 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1111730">フリースケーティング</xref>
+<field>&figskt;</field>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<gloss>free skating</gloss>
+<gloss>long program</gloss>

gg5, prog, daij, meikyo
フリーのカメラマン	6,199		
フリーなカメラマン	0

名•形動 in the kokugos.
According to the refs, sense 3 isn't abbreviation. However, daijr has a separate "フリーランサーの略" sense.
The "one-size-fits-all" sense looks like an abbreviation to me.

@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -13,2 +14,3 @@
-<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
-<gloss>free (of cost)</gloss>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>free (of charge)</gloss>
@@ -17,3 +19,2 @@
-<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="1111920">フリーランス</xref>
-<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -20,0 +22 @@
+<gloss>independent</gloss>
@@ -23 +25,8 @@
-<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1111910">フリーランサー</xref>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<gloss>freelancer</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -25 +34,2 @@
-<gloss>one-size</gloss>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<gloss>one-size-fits-all</gloss>

saw as "頭のサイズ46センチからフリー” on a baby hat

@@ -21,0 +22,5 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1111700">フリーサイズ</xref>
+<gloss>one-size</gloss>
+</sense>

Quite possibly. Thanks.

A bit more info. It is from https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/カトリーヌ・ド・メディシス

カトリーヌはマルグリットを彼女の意思から切り離し、二度と会うことはなかった。

This appears to be a translation of the English "Catherine cut Margaret out of her will and never saw her again" (at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catherine_de'_Medici). However, I guess it may be a mistranslation (translator not understanding the sense in which "will" is meant).

I think it's incorrect to use for a testamentary will.

Are you sure it wasn't 遺志?　Daijisen and Daijirin have a second sense in their 意思 entries but it concerns 
"intent/intention" as a legal term, e.g. criminal intent.

I've seen this used as a translation of English "will" in the sense of a document stating what one wants to happen to one's possessions after one's death. This sense is missing here (or not explicit), but I'm not certain it's a correct translation.

meikyo

@@ -25,0 +26 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

daij, meikyo

Added senses.

@@ -16 +15,0 @@
-<pos>&vs;</pos>
@@ -20,0 +20 @@
+<gloss>ring</gloss>
@@ -22,0 +23,19 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<gloss>participation (e.g. in a plot)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>one flavour</gloss>
+<gloss>one charm</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>one ingredient (in traditional Chinese medicine)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<field>&Buddh;</field>
+<gloss>universality (of the teachings of Buddha)</gloss>
+</sense>

gg5, koj
烏の行水	        2028
からすの行水	2018
カラスの行水	13710

@@ -3,0 +4,6 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>カラスの行水</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>からすの行水</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -12,0 +19 @@
+<misc>&id;</misc>
@@ -13,0 +21 @@
+<gloss>hurried bath</gloss>

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

gg5, prog, daij

I think this is clearer.
Don't see the need for those x-refs.

@@ -17,2 +17 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1223440">記録・1</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1223440">記録・3</xref>
+<gloss>mention (in a document)</gloss>
@@ -19,0 +19 @@
+<gloss>entry</gloss>
@@ -21,2 +20,0 @@
-<gloss>description</gloss>
-<gloss>mention</gloss>
@@ -24,3 +21,0 @@
-<gloss>registration</gloss>
-<gloss>booking</gloss>
-<gloss>entry</gloss>

@@ -17 +17,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1223440">記録</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1223440">記録・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1223440">記録・3</xref>

I think there's a 鬼-ish nuance that's worth highlighting. I see 中辞典 merges them.

@@ -19,0 +20 @@
+<gloss>wizard</gloss>
@@ -21 +21,0 @@
-<gloss>wizard</gloss>

reopen.  see comments below

see comments on 奇才

"wizard" is a better gloss from the standpoint of distinguishing from 奇才.  probably the same reason that gg5 leads with "devilish gift for..." and "wizard".  i would kind of prefer that it remain first

@@ -17,0 +18,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1777830">奇才</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1777830">奇才</xref>

gg5

Probably best not to lead with "wizard".

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<gloss>genius</gloss>
@@ -19,2 +20,2 @@
-<gloss>genius</gloss>
-<gloss>great talent</gloss>
+<gloss>remarkable talent</gloss>
+<gloss>exceptional ability</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 詰め寄る │ 65,351 │ 94.1% │
│ 詰めよる │    745 │  1.1% │ 🡠 sK
│ 詰寄る　 │    326 │  0.5% │ 🡠 (in daijr/s, shinmeikai)
│ つめ寄る │    212 │  0.3% │ 🡠 adding
│ つめよる │  2,814 │  4.1% │
╰─ーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -10 +10 @@
-<keb>詰めよる</keb>
+<keb>詰寄る</keb>
@@ -13 +13,6 @@
-<keb>詰寄る</keb>
+<keb>詰めよる</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>つめ寄る</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

gg5
G n-grams:
詰め寄る	65351
詰寄る	326
詰めよる	745

@@ -7,0 +8,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>詰めよる</keb>
@@ -26 +29,2 @@
-<gloss>to press someone (e.g. for an answer)</gloss>
+<gloss>to press (e.g. for an answer)</gloss>
+<gloss>to hound</gloss>

daijs

@@ -22,0 +22,4 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5r;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

Somehow was left off the remaining sense. It's commonly ～する.

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<pos>&vs;</pos>

gg5, prog

Don't see a need for a separate [vs] sense here.

@@ -18,10 +18,6 @@
-<gloss>publication (e.g. article in paper)</gloss>
-<gloss>appearance</gloss>
-<gloss>insertion</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&vs;</pos>
-<gloss>to insert (e.g. an article)</gloss>
-<gloss>to run (e.g. in a newspaper)</gloss>
-<gloss>to carry (e.g. an article)</gloss>
-<gloss>to post (e.g. on the Web)</gloss>
+<gloss>publication (e.g. of an article in a newspaper)</gloss>
+<gloss>carrying (e.g. a story)</gloss>
+<gloss>running (e.g. a serial)</gloss>
+<gloss>insertion (e.g. of an advertisement)</gloss>
+<gloss>printing</gloss>
+<gloss>posting (e.g. on the web)</gloss>

only an [exp] can be marked as [id].  in any case, the mailing list is the place for conversation

I don't think the constituent parts are just kanji - 月並み is a compound of two words, 魂柱 isn't. Surely "leg-pulling" is just as 
idiomatic in usage as "pulling one's leg"?

Here the only "constituent parts" are the kanji. That doesn't make it idiomatic, any more than 魂柱 is.

Point taken. But the usage is idiomatic, though? "Not apparent from its constituent parts." Wouldn't it better to change the definition in 
the help file to "idiomatic usage"?

a single word cannot be an idiom.  the tag for [id] says it is defined as "idiomatic expression".  if an entry doesn't take [exp] then it can't take [id]

correct restriction is つきなみ; also applies to 月次 with that reading

@@ -33,2 +33 @@
-<stagk>月並み</stagk>
-<stagk>月並</stagk>
+<stagr>つきなみ</stagr>
@@ -37 +35,0 @@
-<misc>&id;</misc>

御免	642659
ご免	135318
ごめん	5311698
ゴメン	1370461

All 37 sentences are sense 1.

@@ -14,0 +15,4 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ゴメン</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>

koj, daij, meikyo, shinmeikai, gg5

gg5 combines senses 1 & 2 (doesn't make sense to me) and senses 3 & 4, which perhaps makes more sense

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1270680">ごめんなさい</xref>
@@ -19,3 +20,10 @@
-<gloss>(I'm) sorry</gloss>
-<gloss>(my) apologies</gloss>
-<gloss>no thanks</gloss>
+<gloss>I'm sorry</gloss>
+<gloss>my apologies</gloss>
+<gloss>excuse me</gloss>
+<gloss>pardon me</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&int;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1270690">ごめんください・1</xref>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>may I come in?</gloss>
@@ -26 +34,16 @@
-<s_inf>usu. 〜はごめんだ</s_inf>
+<misc>&hon;</misc>
+<gloss>permission</gloss>
+<gloss>leave</gloss>
+<gloss>license</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<misc>&hon;</misc>
+<gloss>dismissal</gloss>
+<gloss>discharge</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<s_inf>usu. as 〜はごめんだ</s_inf>
@@ -31,8 +53,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<misc>&uk;</misc>
-<gloss>permission</gloss>
-<gloss>leave</gloss>
-<gloss>dismissal</gloss>
-<gloss>discharge</gloss>

wisdom
https://www.thoughtco.com/when-do-you-use-sumimasen-as-i-am-sorry-3953913
https://voyapon.com/gomenasai-how-apologize-japanese/

"your pardon" is too formal and archaic for this sense

@@ -19,2 +19,2 @@
-<gloss>your pardon</gloss>
-<gloss>sorry</gloss>
+<gloss>(I'm) sorry</gloss>
+<gloss>(my) apologies</gloss>

Good suggestions. I'll cut back sense 1 to just the "int" style.

@@ -18 +17,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -21,2 +20,2 @@
-<gloss>being sorry</gloss>
-<gloss>declining (something)</gloss>
+<gloss>sorry</gloss>
+<gloss>no thanks</gloss>

The first sense is now a mix of int and n glosses and looks a little confusing to me. Wouldn't it be better to split n and int? I think 
it'd be more helpful to just list int glosses in the first sense (e.g. "your pardon; apologies; sorry")

meikyo ([vt] only on sense 2)

@@ -20,0 +21 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -27,0 +29 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
@@ -38,0 +41 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

更生	601082
甦生	5146

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

Koj

See 1596520.

@@ -7,0 +8,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>甦生</keb>

gg5

Better glosses.

@@ -26 +25,0 @@
-<gloss>rejuvenation</gloss>
@@ -28,2 +27,3 @@
-<gloss>reorganisation</gloss>
-<gloss>restoring</gloss>
+<gloss>rebuilding</gloss>
+<gloss>recovery</gloss>
+<gloss>restoration</gloss>

@@ -30 +30 @@
-<xref type="ant">広域</xref>
+<xref type="ant" seq="1278470">広域・2</xref>

See my comments on 広域.

Feel free to improve the gloss, of course.
[ant] should be sense 2 in 広域

@@ -27,0 +28,6 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="ant">広域</xref>
+<gloss>close-up view (of a digitally displayed map)</gloss>
+<gloss>zoomed-in view</gloss>
+</sense>

gg5, prog

I think this is one of those rare cases where it's better to split out [adj-na] usage into a separate sense.
Since the noun form refers to "specific items of information" rather than "the quality of being detailed", it's not immediately obvious from the noun glosses what 詳細な actually means.

@@ -18 +17,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
@@ -20,0 +20,7 @@
+<gloss>specifics</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
+<gloss>detailed</gloss>
+<gloss>specific</gloss>
+<gloss>minute</gloss>

gg5 G-ngrams

mostly a noun
plural makes sense here

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -18,2 +19 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>detail</gloss>
+<gloss>details</gloss>

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -16 +16,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

since we have an entry for 電子式卓上計算機 (as we should), i think it makes sense to stick with our customary style

世界大百科事典: "かつては電子式卓上計算機と呼称したが，1979年にJIS B 0117で正式に電卓となった"

I don't think this should be marked as [abbr] when 電卓 is the only name recognised by JIS. The long name is obsolete. None of the kokugos even have a entry for 電子(式)卓上計算機.
If we have to mention it, I'd prefer a "abbr. of 電子式卓上計算機" note.

@@ -19 +18,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2415180">電子卓上計算機</xref>
@@ -21,0 +21 @@
+<gloss>pocket calculator</gloss>

Oops. 
Rehauling a bit.
I think this is an idiom rather than a proverb, based on daij.

@@ -12,3 +12,3 @@
-<misc>&proverb;</misc>
-<gloss>don't cover your head and leave your bottom exposed</gloss>
-<gloss>you have to be careful not to expose your weak point while attempting to protect yourself</gloss>
+<misc>&id;</misc>
+<gloss>burying one's head in the sand (while leaving other parts of one's body exposed)</gloss>
+<gloss>exposing one's weak point while attempting to protect oneself</gloss>

gloss one already seems to cover the lit sense?

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<gloss g_type="lit">hiding one's head without hiding one's bottom</gloss>

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<misc>&proverb;</misc>

I don't think sense 4 should have a food tag. It's a growing technique, not a cooking process.

@@ -43,2 +43 @@
-<field>&food;</field>
-<gloss>blanching (of vegetables; by depriving of light)</gloss>
+<gloss>blanching (of vegetables; by depriving them of light)</gloss>

mk

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -24,0 +26 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -31,0 +34 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -38,0 +42,2 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<field>&food;</field>

daijr/s

@@ -32,0 +33 @@
+<field>&finc;</field>
@@ -38 +39 @@
-<gloss>blanching (e.g. of vegetables; by depriving of light)</gloss>
+<gloss>blanching (of vegetables; by depriving of light)</gloss>

G n-grams:
軟膏	280989
軟こう	5770

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>軟こう</keb>

mk

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーー─┬───────┬───────╮
│ 聞き漏らす　 │ 5,413 │ 89.5% │
│ 聞きもらす　 │   492 │  8.1% │
│ 聞き洩らす　 │    90 │  1.5% │ <- koj, oukoku, meikyo
│ ききもらす　 │    53 │  0.9% │
├─ーーーーーー─┼───────┼───────┤
│ 聞き漏らした │ 5,055 │ 90.0% │
│ 聞きもらした │   391 │  7.0% │
│ 聞き洩らした │   131 │  2.3% │
│ ききもらした │    37 │  0.7% │
╰─ーーーーーー─┴───────┴───────╯

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

Ngrams

@@ -8,0 +9,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>聞き洩らす</keb>

Also written 聞き洩らす.

MW 
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/apothecary

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<gloss>apothecary</gloss>

Only refers to the person.

@@ -18 +17,0 @@
-<gloss>apothecary</gloss>

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<gloss>apothecary</gloss>
@@ -23,0 +25 @@
+<gloss>apothecary</gloss>

G n-grams:
くすり屋	22002

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>くすり屋</keb>

We should have it somewhere. RP uses this term and my other EJs use 薬屋. I'll move it 
there.

I don't think an old word like "apothecary" is a fitting translation for a modern term like 薬剤師, which refers to licensed pharmacists.

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<gloss>pharmacist</gloss>
@@ -17,2 +17,0 @@
-<gloss>pharmacist</gloss>
-<gloss>apothecary</gloss>

http://ejje.weblio.jp/content/apothecary  
http://mtgwiki.com/wiki/熟練の薬剤師/Master_Apothecary  
http://kotobank.jp/word/apothecary

The JMDICT didn't have a match for "apothecary", and this seemed to be the most common equivalent when I searched.

@@ -18,0 +18,1 @@
+<gloss>apothecary</gloss>

Add POS to proverbs
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<pos>&v5g;</pos>

Not a lit. (and the English expression is of 
course used figuratively as well)

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<gloss g_type="lit">the one who smelt it dealt it</gloss>
+<gloss>the one who smelt it dealt it</gloss>

Yes

@@ -13 +12,0 @@
-<gloss>the one who smelt it dealt it</gloss>
@@ -14,0 +14 @@
+<gloss g_type="lit">the one who smelt it dealt it</gloss>

-> gender-neutral fart language.  should it be a lit gloss?

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>he who smelt it dealt it</gloss>
+<gloss>the one who smelt it dealt it</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
269,136	 96.9%	脅かす
    202	  0.1%	嚇かす
    174	  0.1%	威かす
  8,287	  3.0%	おどかす

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -14,0 +16 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

No idea. They were there in my last pre-database version from 2010.

what happened here with the addition of the news1/nf1 frequency tags?  were they missing?  did they get lost in a split?  where did they come from?

@@ -7,4 +6,0 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>脅やかす</keb>
-<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
269,136	 93.6%	脅かす
    480	  0.2%	脅やかす
     45	  0.0%	劫かす
 18,029	  6.3%	おびやかす

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

the xref was presumably there as a disambig between the two identical kanji forms.

gg5, daij

I don't think the x-ref ref is necessary. None of the refs mention 脅かす.

@@ -22,2 +21,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1578070">脅かす・おどかす</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1578070">脅かす・おどかす</xref>
@@ -24,0 +23 @@
+<gloss>to frighten</gloss>
@@ -29,0 +29 @@
+<gloss>to threaten (e.g. peace)</gloss>

G n-grams:
事迹	112
事跡	20252
事蹟	11111

Reordering kanji forms.

@@ -4,3 +3,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>事迹</keb>
-</k_ele>
@@ -11,0 +9,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>事迹</keb>

G n-grams:
とびひの治療	460
飛び火の治療	No matches

The impetigo sense is [uk]. I don't think it should be tagged [med], given that it's not a technical term.

@@ -38 +37,0 @@
-<field>&med;</field>
@@ -39,0 +39 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

daij, gg5, prog

Senses 2 and 3 are [vs].
Sense 2 has to involve leaping flames. 飛び火 would not be used to describe the spread of a fire through a single house, for instance.

@@ -20 +20 @@
-<gloss>shower of flying sparks</gloss>
+<gloss>flying sparks</gloss>
@@ -24 +24,2 @@
-<gloss>spreading fire</gloss>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<gloss>spread of fire (due to leaping flames)</gloss>
@@ -27,0 +29 @@
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
@@ -33,0 +36 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2833646">膿痂疹</xref>
@@ -35,0 +39 @@
+<misc>&col;</misc>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

I agree. The law dictionaries don't have kokoku or interlocutory.

特別抗告　was in the news today: 
https://www.asahi.com/articles/ASL6C4R5VL6CUTIL027.html

The proposed meaning is consistent with Daijirin and Kenkyusha(I am not 
sure if gg5 is the correct citation for my smartphone version, but it does 
say 第5版). 
Daijirin:下級裁判所の決定・命令を不服として、上級裁判所に不服を申し立てること。
gg5: (法) a protest; a complaint; an appeal

I suggest there is no need to include the romaji "kokoku" in the Meaning. 
In my opinion "appeal" is a valid translation because, although procedural 
details may differ, the underlying concept is common to different 
jurisdictions.

"Interlocutory"　is a particular type of appeal so should be in a separate 
entry. 

When the issue about deleting the romaji (kokoku) is settled I will submit 
revisions for 準抗告、特別抗告　and 即時抗告 which have the same issue. I will 
also have a go at separating entries for "urgent" and "interlocutory", that 
is if it can be done without calling for a lawyer. Also can take the 
opportunity to update the cross-referencing.

@@ -17 +17,2 @@
-<gloss>kokoku (interlocutory) appeal</gloss>
+<field>&law;</field>
+<gloss>appeal</gloss>

gg5, prog, ウィズダム

@@ -36,0 +37,2 @@
+<gloss>husky voice</gloss>
+<gloss>guttural voice</gloss>
@@ -37,0 +40 @@
+<gloss>gravelly voice</gloss>

G n-grams:
だみ声	18635
濁声	3546
訛み声	No matches
訛声	57
ダミ声	31849
だみごえ	209
だくせい	66
ダミごえ	2

Dunno how 濁 came to be だみ.

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ダミ声</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -11,3 +13,0 @@
-<keb>訛み声</keb>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
@@ -17 +17 @@
-<keb>ダミ声</keb>
+<keb>訛み声</keb>
@@ -19,0 +20,4 @@
+<reb>ダミごえ</reb>
+<re_restr>ダミ声</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -20,0 +25,4 @@
+<re_restr>だみ声</re_restr>
+<re_restr>濁声</re_restr>
+<re_restr>訛声</re_restr>
+<re_restr>訛み声</re_restr>

@@ -14,0 +15,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ダミ声</keb>

gg5

GG5 notes "日本では調剤師という職業名はなく, 薬剤師が調剤を行わなければならない."

@@ -12 +12,3 @@
-<gloss>pharmacist</gloss>
+<gloss>prescriptionist</gloss>
+<gloss>compounder</gloss>
+<gloss>dispenser</gloss>

gg5
G n-grams:
膝詰め	1563
ひざ詰め	1014
膝づめ	501
膝詰	342

@@ -5,0 +6,9 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ひざ詰め</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>膝づめ</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>膝詰</keb>
@@ -12 +21,3 @@
-<gloss>knee to knee</gloss>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<gloss>(sitting) knee-to-knee</gloss>
+<gloss>face-to-face</gloss>

G n-grams:

一味　　 1,299,071 73.4%
ひと味　   449,188 25.4%
ひとあじ    21,608  1.2%

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ひと味</keb>

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2221670">一味違う</xref>

daijr

Only daijr has two senses but I think is helpful for showing that the words is used figuratively.
I don't think [adv] is right. None of the kokugos mention adverbial usage. 一味違う is a special case.

@@ -11 +10,0 @@
-<pos>&adv;</pos>
@@ -14 +13,6 @@
-<gloss>peculiar flavor</gloss>
+<gloss>(degree of) flavouring</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>distinctive quality</gloss>
+<gloss>special charm</gloss>

reopen

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1661990">売り方・1</xref>
@@ -23,0 +25 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1661990">売り方・2</xref>

koj, daij

temp approve for xref

@@ -7,0 +8,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>買方</keb>
@@ -18,0 +22,4 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>method of buying</gloss>
+</sense>

daijr entry for 鬼才.  all sources keep them apart despite very similar meanings
〔同音語の「奇才」は世にも珍しいすぐれた才能のことであるが、それに対して「鬼才」は人間とは思われないほどのすぐれた才能をいう〕

@@ -12 +12,3 @@
-<gloss>genius</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1224220">鬼才</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1224220">鬼才</xref>
+<gloss>rare genius</gloss>

gg5

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>quick-wittedness</gloss>

Aligning with そう

@@ -19,0 +20 @@
+<gloss>so</gloss>

koj, daij, gg5

merge

@@ -6,0 +6,7 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>然様</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>佐様</keb>
+<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>
@@ -12,1 +19,4 @@
-<pos>&adv;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>like that</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
@@ -14,2 +24,1 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>like that</gloss>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -17,0 +26,6 @@
+<gloss>indeed</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&int;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>let me see...</gloss>

daijr: "薬の材料。特に漢方薬の材料となる草木などの生薬"

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -13,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>ingredients (for Chinese medicine)</gloss>

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<field>&food;</field>

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicken_katsu

@@ -11,0 +12,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1037720">カツ</xref>
+<gloss>chicken katsu</gloss>

Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>チキン・カツ</reb>

gg5, prog

@@ -12,0 +13,3 @@
+<gloss>contents (of a record)</gloss>
+<gloss>recorded items</gloss>
+<gloss>entries</gloss>

Doubt it.

Was the s necessary?

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>fried eggs</gloss>
+<gloss>fried egg</gloss>

Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>フライド・エッグ</reb>

We can delete the new sense I added (forgot to mention it).

@@ -41,5 +40,0 @@
-<sense>
-<pos>&v1;</pos>
-<pos>&vt;</pos>
-<gloss>to serve (good food)</gloss>
-</sense>

GG5, sense 1:
あの店ではうまいステーキを食わせる. That restaurant serves good steaks.
彼の奥さんはよく晩飯を食わせてくれた. His wife often gave me dinner.

Makes more sense for the example for sense 1.

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<gloss>to serve (e.g. in a restaurant)</gloss>

gg5, prog

More glosses.
I note that the sentences aren't correctly tagged.

@@ -13,2 +13,4 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2007890">食わす</xref>
-<gloss>to feed</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2007890">食わす・1</xref>
+<gloss>to feed (e.g. an animal on oats)</gloss>
+<gloss>to let eat</gloss>
+<gloss>to force to eat</gloss>
@@ -19 +21,3 @@
-<gloss>to provide</gloss>
+<gloss>to support (e.g. a family)</gloss>
+<gloss>to provide for</gloss>
+<gloss>to keep</gloss>
@@ -24 +28,3 @@
-<gloss>to inflict</gloss>
+<gloss>to inflict (damage)</gloss>
+<gloss>to deal (e.g. a blow)</gloss>
+<gloss>to administer</gloss>
@@ -28,0 +35,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2835972">一杯食わせる</xref>
+<gloss>to deceive</gloss>
@@ -29,0 +38,6 @@
+<gloss>to trick</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>to serve (good food)</gloss>

I don't think the tag makes much sense here.

@@ -12,2 +12 @@
-<field>&MA;</field>
-<gloss>sai (an Okinawan weapon)</gloss>
+<gloss>sai (Okinawan weapon)</gloss>

Entry created

I think it was decided that [adj-no] shouldn't be on pronoun entries.

@@ -19 +18,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

adj-no doesn't sound correct

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos>

google

@@ -18 +18,4 @@
-<gloss>oil-absorbent paper used cosmetically to absorb oil from (facial) skin</gloss>
+<gloss>blotting sheet (as a cosmetic aid for removing oils and make up)</gloss>
+<gloss>blotting paper</gloss>
+<gloss>oil absorbing sheet</gloss>
+<gloss>oil absorbing paper</gloss>

GG5,大辞林、広辞苑

Add 脂取り紙 as kanji; all the dictionaries list only this form, but 油取り紙 (with 油) is about twice as common on Google.

@@ -9,0 +9,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>脂取り紙</keb>

Entry created

GG5

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>smash hit</gloss>

Arguably col, I guess, but... nah.

@@ -13 +12,0 @@
-<misc>&sl;</misc>

Entry created

G n-grams:
ボンボヤージュ	16737
ボンヴォヤージュ	701
ボンボヤージ	895
ボンボワイヤージュ 89
---
ボン・ヴォヤージュ	        4382
ボン・ボヤージュ	        2281
ボン・ボヤージ	        200
ボン・ボワイヤージュ	689

Merging in forms from 2835976.

@@ -4,0 +5,9 @@
+<reb>ボンボヤージュ</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ボンヴォヤージュ</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ボンボヤージ</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -5,0 +15,9 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ボン・ボヤージュ</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ボン・ヴォヤージュ</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ボン・ボヤージ</reb>

Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ボン・ボワイヤージュ</reb>

@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@
+<gloss>have a nice trip</gloss>

@@ -8,1 +8,1 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&int;</pos>

@@ -31 +31 @@
-<lsource xml:lang="fre"/>
+<lsource xml:lang="fre">bon voyage</lsource>

G n-grams:
ボンボヤージュ	16737
ボンヴォヤージュ	701
ボンボヤージ	895
ボンボワイヤージュ 89
---
ボン・ヴォヤージュ	        4382
ボン・ボヤージュ	        2281
ボン・ボヤージ	        200
ボン・ボワイヤージュ	689

Merging in forms from 2835976.

@@ -4,0 +5,9 @@
+<reb>ボンボヤージュ</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ボンヴォヤージュ</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ボンボヤージ</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -5,0 +15,9 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ボン・ボヤージュ</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ボン・ヴォヤージュ</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ボン・ボヤージ</reb>

Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ボン・ボワイヤージュ</reb>

A+B.

Entry created

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicken_katsu

@@ -21,0 +22 @@
+<gloss>chicken katsu</gloss>

Entry created

G n-grams:
カムコーダー	8914
カムコーダ	4878
キャムコーダー	No matches
キャムコーダ	89

daijr/s have キャムコーダー.

@@ -6,0 +7,9 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>カムコーダ</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>キャムコーダー</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>キャムコーダ</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -9 +17,0 @@
-<field>&comp;</field>

Entry created

Aligning.
I don't think it's ever read ぱなし outside of っぱなし. Could be helpful for lookups, though.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
@@ -15 +16 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1008020">っ放し・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1008020">っぱなし・1</xref>
@@ -17 +18,10 @@
-<s_inf>negative nuance, with the state being improper, unpleasant, etc.</s_inf>
+<s_inf>usu. as ...っぱなし; after the -masu stem of a verb; indicates that something is left in an improper state</s_inf>
+<gloss>leaving (on, open, unfinished, etc.)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1008020">っぱなし・2</xref>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<s_inf>usu. as ...っぱなし; after the -masu stem of a verb</s_inf>
+<gloss>(doing) continuously</gloss>
+<gloss>constantly</gloss>
@@ -19,3 +28,0 @@
-<gloss>have been ...-ing</gloss>
-<gloss>leaving (something) on</gloss>
-<gloss>leaving (something) still in use</gloss>

-> note

@@ -18 +18,2 @@
-<gloss>keep ...-ing (negative nuance, with the state being improper, unpleasant, etc.)</gloss>
+<s_inf>negative nuance, with the state being improper, unpleasant, etc.</s_inf>
+<gloss>keep ...-ing</gloss>

@@ -19,1 +19,1 @@
-<gloss>leaving  (something) on</gloss>
+<gloss>leaving (something) on</gloss>

GG5

もうちょっとしたら	1204
もうちょいしたら	103

The note doesn't add much, imo.

@@ -9 +9 @@
-<gloss>in a little while (referring to the very near future on the order of minutes)</gloss>
+<gloss>in a little while</gloss>

While 近いうちに or そのうちに both have similar meanings, they don't suffice in this situation, which specifically refers to the very near future. It carries a different nuance than すぐ or 今すぐ and is useful in conversation when you're talking about your plans or expectations of the near future. 今私は本を読んでるが、もうちょっとしたら出かけようと思う。I'm reading a book right now, but I think I'm going to head out soon.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>the youngest daughter</gloss>
+<gloss>youngest daughter</gloss>

Daijirin

daijr/s

@@ -13,2 +13,3 @@
-<gloss>blanching (cultivation method)</gloss>
-<gloss g_type="expl">whitening (of vegetables, etc.) by depriving of light</gloss>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1460740">軟化・4</xref>
+<gloss>blanching (of vegetables; by depriving them of light)</gloss>

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blanching_(cooking)

Not the cooking method.

@@ -13 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>blanching (vegetables)</gloss>
+<gloss>blanching (cultivation method)</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">whitening (of vegetables, etc.) by depriving of light</gloss>

I do too. At the worst they are harmless.

we have been pretty consistent about trying to follow kokugos (and japanese handbooks of grammar for english speakers) in including entries for parts of speech like this.  i strongly think they should all be kept.

For the record, I don't really think this should be an entry.
Not sure if the glosses are helpful or not but maybe this is good enough for now (at least until the issue on how to handle glossless 
entries is resolved)

@@ -10,2 +10,3 @@
-<s_inf>だ after certain verb forms</s_inf>
-<gloss>indicate past or completed action</gloss>
+<s_inf>だ after certain verb forms; indicate past or completed action</s_inf>
+<gloss>did</gloss>
+<gloss>(have) done</gloss>
@@ -16 +17,2 @@
-<gloss>indicates light imperative</gloss>
+<s_inf>indicates mild imperative</s_inf>
+<gloss>(please) do</gloss>

6-yo typo!

Fixing typo. This should be exactly the same as 2089020・だ
[2], right?

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<gloss>indicate past completed or action</gloss>
+<gloss>indicate past or completed action</gloss>

Did this a couple of days ago, but must have missed the final step.

@@ -6,3 +5,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>よー</reb>
@@ -29,14 +25,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&int;</pos>
-<misc>&fam;</misc>
-<gloss>hey</gloss>
-<gloss>yo</gloss>
-<gloss>hi</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&prt;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="2029090">よ</xref>
-<s_inf>empathetic version of よ</s_inf>
-<gloss>come on</gloss>
-<gloss>hey</gloss>

Saw as よお for sense  4. suggest splitting out 4 and 5 together with よー

No further comments. Closing.

Fine, but I suggest trimming back the notes as they rather swamp the entry. The "食べる→食べよう" spells out the context.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<s_inf>attaches to the verb stem of non-五段 verbs, e.g. 食べる→食べよう; indicates intention</s_inf>
+<s_inf>on non-五段 stem, e.g. 食べる→食べよう; indicates intention</s_inf>
@@ -18 +18 @@
-<s_inf>attaches to the verb stem of non-五段 verbs; indicates suggestion or invitation</s_inf>
+<s_inf>on non-五段 stem; indicates suggestion or invitation</s_inf>
@@ -23 +23 @@
-<s_inf>attaches to the verb stem of non-五段 verbs; indicates speculation</s_inf>
+<s_inf>on non-五段 stem; indicates speculation</s_inf>

Thanks for the clarification. I was going to argue these senses shouldn't be included because it's a conjugation for only a limited set 
of verb classes (一段 and する/くる?) and we don't have similar entries for -そう, -とう, etc. which should be equally valid... but I 
realized these senses are actually included in daijs' and daijr's よう entries and we do actually have an entry for "た" ("indicates past 
tense") in JMDict as well. 
_
My preference would still be to follow GG5's example to not include these senses and also not have an entry for た, but I guess that'd be 
a topic for the mailing list instead of the comment section of this one entry.
_
In the meanwhile, I've tried improve the 3 senses because I don't think the definitions/notes were very clear. I've moved the previous 
glosses into usage notes and added actual glosses. To what extent the glosses are helpful, I'm not sure, but until the separate issue of 
glossless senses are resolved, maybe this will do. I also moved the previous sense 1 to sense 3 as I think it's the least common aux-v 
usage (if that's indeed the correct PoS).
_
"verb stem" - is this the right term? I forget

@@ -12,2 +12,3 @@
-<s_inf>non-五段 verbs, e.g. 食べよう</s_inf>
-<gloss>indicates speculation</gloss>
+<s_inf>attaches to the verb stem of non-五段 verbs, e.g. 食べる→食べよう; indicates intention</s_inf>
+<gloss>(I) will</gloss>
+<gloss>(I) shall</gloss>
@@ -17 +18,2 @@
-<gloss>indicates will</gloss>
+<s_inf>attaches to the verb stem of non-五段 verbs; indicates suggestion or invitation</s_inf>
+<gloss>let's</gloss>
@@ -21,2 +23,6 @@
-<s_inf>indicates invitation</s_inf>
-<gloss>let's</gloss>
+<s_inf>attaches to the verb stem of non-五段 verbs; indicates speculation</s_inf>
+<gloss>(I) wonder (if)</gloss>
+<gloss>might it be (that)</gloss>
+<gloss>maybe</gloss>
+<gloss>perhaps</gloss>
+<gloss>perchance</gloss>
@@ -35,0 +42 @@
+<gloss>hey</gloss>

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<misc>&id;</misc>

GG5, ルミナス, etc.

@@ -12,1 +12,3 @@
-<gloss>to be incline to go</gloss>
+<pos>&v5k;</pos>
+<gloss>to head towards</gloss>
+<gloss>to be inclined to go towards</gloss>

http://kotobank.jp/word/足が向く

@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+<lsource ls_wasei="y">in camera</lsource>

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<xref type="ant" seq="2830370">アウトカメラ</xref>

www images

@@ -9 +9 @@
-<gloss>front-facing camera in a smartphone, tablet or other portable device</gloss>
+<gloss>front camera (smartphone, tablet, etc.)</gloss>

反対語　アウトカメラ

I managed to reverse the readings, the in-camera is the 
front-facing or "selfie" camera while the アウトカメラ is 
the  rear-facing camera.

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<reb>アウトカメラ</reb>
+<reb>インカメラ</reb>

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<lsource ls_wasei="y">out camera</lsource>

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<xref type="ant" seq="2830369">インカメラ</xref>

www images

@@ -9 +9 @@
-<gloss>camera in a smartphone, tablet or other portable device that has the lens facing away from the user</gloss>
+<gloss>rear camera (smartphone, tablet, etc.)</gloss>

http://www.weblio.jp/content/アウト�
%82%AB%E3%83%A1%E3%83%A9

反対語　インカメラ
ＩＴ用語

for the record, i checked meikyo.  it is the only of my sources that specifies a pos for -っぱなし entries, and it reports noun for all four of its entries, with no evidence that they consider it an exp:
あけっ‐ぱなし【開けっ放し（明けっ放し）】 = 名・形動
うちっ‐ぱなし【打ちっ放し】 = 名
かちっ‐ぱなし【勝ちっ放し】 = 名
やりっ‐ぱなし【▽遣りっ放し】 = 名

the only relevant entries with specified pos in daijs/daijr are also n, with none called 連語:
開けっ放し／明けっ放し = ［名・形動］
遣りっ放し =［名・形動］

even if you do consider it verb stem + suffix, as opposed to noun + suffix, we don't consider those expressions.  E.g., 乗りにくい is an adj-i, not exp,adj-i

なり is a noun

This is a verb + suffix. I'm surprised we don't consider this an expression.

っぱなし is a suffix.  in edict, noun+suffix = noun, not expression.  even compound nouns are not marked as expressions

@@ -14 +13,0 @@
-<pos>&exp;</pos>

This is an expression. Regular use of the っぱなし grammar point.
I don't think "howling" or "resounding" are good glosses.

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
@@ -16,3 +17 @@
-<gloss>sounding continuously (e.g. phone)</gloss>
-<gloss>howling</gloss>
-<gloss>resounding</gloss>
+<gloss>sounding continuously (phone, alarm, etc.)</gloss>

G n-grams:
さだかではない	11732
吝かではない	3169

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos>

http://www.weblio.jp/content/吝かではない

I guess not.

yeah, no entry for そうですか suggests that this entry might be unneeded. shinmeikai does have an entry for さいです (not さいですか), but they don't have an entry for just さい (which we do now)

Glosses need to be in question form.
Is this necessary now that we have an entry for さい? We don't have そうですか.

@@ -10 +9,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1006650">そうだ・1</xref>
@@ -15,2 +14,2 @@
-<gloss>that is so</gloss>
-<gloss>that is right</gloss>
+<gloss>is that so?</gloss>
+<gloss>really?</gloss>

https://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q1331914868
G n-grams: 7962

From the forked/amended 2835807 (now さい).
I think it's worth keeping. I see MeCab/Unidic mess up the parsing, interpreting it as 際+ですか.

Old term.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>pharmacist</gloss>
+<gloss>apothecary</gloss>

gg5, daij

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<misc>&hist;</misc>

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>Sam-il Movement</gloss>

koj daij https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/March_1st_Movement

ＫＯＤ追加語彙, ルミナス

@@ -6,0 +7,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ナンバー・スクール</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -9 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>numbered high school (in the old school system)</gloss>
+<lsource ls_wasei="y">number school</lsource>
+<gloss>(one of) the eight earliest and most prestigious high schools (Meiji period)</gloss>

daij koj

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<misc>&hist;</misc>

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>Minister of Communications and Transportation</gloss>
+<gloss>Minister of Communications and Transportation (1885-1949)</gloss>

koj

Merging with 2203400.

ボン・ヴォヤージュ	4382
ボン・ボヤージュ	2281
ボン・ボヤージ	200
ボンヴォヤージュ	701
ボンボヤージュ	16737
ボンボヤージ	895

They should be in frequency order, with the dotted versions following.

@@ -12,0 +13,9 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ボンヴォヤージュ</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ボンボヤージュ</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ボンボヤージ</reb>
+</r_ele>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/ボン・ヴォヤージュ

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ゲージ・タイ</reb>

Quite uncommon.

@@ -9 +9 @@
-<gloss>gauge tie (on a railroad)</gloss>
+<gloss>gauge tie (railroad)</gloss>

https://ejje.weblio.jp/content/ゲージタイ

ＫＯＤ追加語彙 (xrefs to 雰囲気)

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1505070">雰囲気・1</xref>
@@ -15,0 +17 @@
+<gloss>ambience</gloss>

km ngrams
空気感	4302
daij

Didn't expect to actually find this one in the kokugo's.

ｇｇ５

G n-grams: 4490

A lot of the top Google results are for ジュースクレンズ.

km 166

saw on product