よみくさ is in Unidic, but it seems pretty rare.

@@ -10,3 +9,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>よみくさ</reb>
-</r_ele>

I can't find a source for the よみくさ reading. Remove?
Expunging "draught".

@@ -16 +15,0 @@
-<gloss>draught poem</gloss>

Aligning.

@@ -12,2 +12,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2535360">黄金比・おうごんひ</xref>
-<gloss>golden ratio (approx. 1.6180339887)</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2535360">黄金比</xref>
+<gloss>golden ratio</gloss>

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>golden mean</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2535360">黄金比・おうごんひ</xref>
+<gloss>golden ratio (approx. 1.6180339887)</gloss>

Eijiro: golden section
G n-grams: 22122
http://dic.nicovideo.jp/a/黄金率 - suggestions it's like 黄金律 and 黄金比
http://www.shimizu-camera.co.jp/glossary/detail5.html

Seems legitimate. Gloss could be better.

Is there a source for this?

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

gg5

Expunging "draught".

@@ -13,2 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>drafting</gloss>
-<gloss>draughting</gloss>
+<gloss>drafting (a plan, contract, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>drawing up</gloss>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -12,0 +13,2 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

gg5, prog

Expunging "draught".

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>beginning writing (a draft)</gloss>
@@ -14 +14,0 @@
-<gloss>draughting</gloss>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

Expunging "draught".

@@ -17,3 +17,2 @@
-<gloss>drafting</gloss>
-<gloss>draughting</gloss>
-<gloss>drawing up a bill</gloss>
+<gloss>drafting (e.g. a bill)</gloss>
+<gloss>drawing up</gloss>

gg5, daijr

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>approximate</gloss>
+<field>&math;</field>
+<gloss>approximate value</gloss>

gg5 G-ngrams

-> adj glosses

@@ -13,3 +13,4 @@
-<gloss>luxury</gloss>
-<gloss>magnificence</gloss>
-<gloss>extravagance</gloss>
+<gloss>luxurious</gloss>
+<gloss>magnificent</gloss>
+<gloss>extravagant</gloss>
+<gloss>sumptuous</gloss>

For the record, I think the ngram numbers are slightly misleading because you wouldn't say 今日は最悪の日だった, only 今日は人生最悪の日だっ
た。etc.  (confirmed with native informant), which is also part of why I question whether this really is a "true" adj-no. With this in mind, I think having 
adj-na first is sensible.

Over half the sentences are 最悪の...  worst.

G n-grams:
最悪の日	17397
最悪な日	10794

To tell the truth, I've still not figured out what a "true adj-no" is yet (it's more complicated than I first thought) but I think I would consider this [adj-no]. 最悪の日 doesn't mean "day of the worst case" but rather "worst/terrible day". I'd put [adj-no] first for that sense.
Agree with the new [col] sense but I think "disgusting"/"repulsive" are more appropriate for 最低 than 最悪.
Adverbial usage is [col] so I think it needs to be a separate sense. Also cleaner this way.

@@ -20 +19,0 @@
-<pos>&adv;</pos>
@@ -22,3 +21 @@
-<gloss>(in) the worst (case)</gloss>
-<gloss>(at) the worst</gloss>
-<gloss>(if) worst (comes to worst)</gloss>
+<gloss>worst</gloss>
@@ -30 +26,0 @@
-<gloss>the worst</gloss>
@@ -34,3 +30,7 @@
-<gloss>disgusting</gloss>
-<gloss>repulsive</gloss>
-<gloss>disagreable</gloss>
+<gloss>terrible</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
+<misc>&col;</misc>
+<gloss>in the worst case</gloss>
+<gloss>if worst comes to worst</gloss>

ngrams

最悪な人	94
最悪の人	39
最悪な場合	112
最悪の場合	7192

I think 最悪の mainly refers to "worst case", etc., so I'm not really sure this is a what Robin would call a true adj-no. Either way, I 
don't think adj-no should come first. 
I merged sense 1 and 2 (the adv sense) and created a new sense for the more casual but very common usage (which can't be used 
adverbially and essentially not as adj-no either, from my understanding)

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
@@ -18 +18,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
@@ -19,0 +20 @@
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
@@ -21 +22,3 @@
-<gloss>the worst</gloss>
+<gloss>(in) the worst (case)</gloss>
+<gloss>(at) the worst</gloss>
+<gloss>(if) worst (comes to worst)</gloss>
@@ -24 +27,2 @@
-<pos>&adv;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
+<pos>&int;</pos>
@@ -26 +30,7 @@
-<gloss>in the worst case</gloss>
+<gloss>the worst</gloss>
+<gloss>horrible</gloss>
+<gloss>horrid</gloss>
+<gloss>awful</gloss>
+<gloss>disgusting</gloss>
+<gloss>repulsive</gloss>
+<gloss>disagreable</gloss>

I found 2 genuine hits.

G n-grams: No matches

Not in the refs. Google hits are Chinese or lead back here.

@@ -57 +57 @@
-<gloss>slips of paper posted on shrine pillars by pilgrims</gloss>
+<gloss>slip of paper posted on shrine pillars by pilgrims</gloss>

@@ -31 +31,2 @@
-<gloss>check,receipt</gloss>
+<gloss>check</gloss>
+<gloss>receipt</gloss>

daijs, 新和英中辞典
_
sense 3 (sign;card;plate) → daijs: "１ 目的とする内容などを簡単
に書いて、人に示したり渡したりする紙片や木片。「遊泳禁止の―を立てる」
「質―」"

sense 1 and 2 could be merged

@@ -9,0 +10,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>簡</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -15,0 +19,8 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ふみた</reb>
+<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ふんだ</reb>
+<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>
@@ -17,0 +29 @@
+<gloss>ticket</gloss>
@@ -19 +31 @@
-<gloss>label</gloss>
+<gloss>check,receipt</gloss>
@@ -23,2 +35,2 @@
-<gloss>ticket</gloss>
-<gloss>card</gloss>
+<gloss>label</gloss>
+<gloss>tag</gloss>
@@ -27,0 +40,11 @@
+<gloss>sign</gloss>
+<gloss>card</gloss>
+<gloss>plate</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>playing card</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1653390">守り札</xref>
@@ -30,0 +54,4 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>slips of paper posted on shrine pillars by pilgrims</gloss>
+</sense>

14 sentences; all sense 1.

Two senses in daijs.

@@ -16,3 +16,8 @@
-<pos>&suf;</pos>
-<gloss>on the verge</gloss>
-<gloss>on the brink</gloss>
+<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
+<gloss>just before</gloss>
+<gloss>on the verge of</gloss>
+<gloss>on the brink of</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
@@ -20 +25 @@
-<gloss>just before</gloss>
+<gloss>just ahead of</gloss>

http://eow.alc.co.jp/寸前/UTF-8/?ref=sa
http://dic.yahoo.co.jp/dsearch?enc=UTF-8&p=寸前&dtype=3&dname=2na&stype=0&pagenum=1&index=02248500

@@ -18,0 +18,1 @@
+<gloss>on the brink</gloss>
@@ -19,0 +20,1 @@
+<gloss>just before</gloss>

gg5

I think this is clearer.

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>sex difference</gloss>
+<gloss>difference between the sexes</gloss>
+<gloss>sexual difference</gloss>

N-grams:
染み通る	1036
染み透る	1692
沁み透る	216
染通る	< 20
染透る	288
沁透る	< 20
染みとおる	2472

Freq, order.

@@ -3,0 +4,6 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>染みとおる</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>染み透る</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -8 +14 @@
-<keb>染み透る</keb>
+<keb>染透る</keb>
@@ -17,3 +22,0 @@
-<keb>染透る</keb>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
@@ -21,3 +23,0 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>染みとおる</keb>

"ふいているかいないのか、わからないほどの夜風。しんと静まり返ったこんな夜には、それすらも、耳の奥に染みとおるように感じられる。"

@@ -21,0 +22,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>染みとおる</keb>
+</k_ele>

gg5

Expunging "draught".

@@ -16,2 +16 @@
-<gloss>draft</gloss>
-<gloss>draught</gloss>
+<gloss>draft (for a speech, bill, etc.)</gloss>

gg5

Expunging "draught".

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<gloss>demand draught</gloss>
+<gloss>remittance check</gloss>

Various JEs.

https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=第一人者

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<gloss>foremost figure</gloss>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

gg5, daij

-> noun glosses

@@ -19 +19,4 @@
-<gloss>carry out</gloss>
+<xref type="ant" seq="1481320">搬入</xref>
+<xref type="ant" seq="1481320">搬入</xref>
+<gloss>carrying out (esp. heavy objects, artwork, furniture)</gloss>
+<gloss>taking out</gloss>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

daij

Best to have the examples on the first gloss.

@@ -16,0 +17,3 @@
+<xref type="ant" seq="1481290">搬出</xref>
+<gloss>carrying in (esp. heavy objects, artwork, furniture)</gloss>
+<gloss>bringing in</gloss>
@@ -18,2 +20,0 @@
-<gloss>bringing in (esp. heavy objects, artwork, furniture)</gloss>
-<gloss>carrying in</gloss>

GG5, etc.

@@ -17,2 +17,3 @@
-<gloss>take in</gloss>
-<gloss>bring in (esp. heavy objects, artwork, furniture)</gloss>
+<gloss>taking in</gloss>
+<gloss>bringing in (esp. heavy objects, artwork, furniture)</gloss>
+<gloss>carrying in</gloss>

新解さん

E.g. of “heavy objects” etc.

@@ -18,1 +18,1 @@
-<gloss>bring in</gloss>
+<gloss>bring in (esp. heavy objects, artwork, furniture)</gloss>

@@ -35 +35 @@
-<s_inf>used in dictionaries</s_inf>
+<s_inf>dictionary tag used in dictionaries</s_inf>

@@ -35,1 +35,2 @@
-<gloss>adverb (used in dictionaries)</gloss>
+<s_inf>used in dictionaries</s_inf>
+<gloss>adverb</gloss>

http://dic.yahoo.co.jp/guide/jj02/jj9.html
http://dic.yahoo.co.jp/guide/jj/jj8_4.html
http://www.japanknowledge.com/contents/hanrei/nikkoku/nikkoku0
5.html
used in daijs, daijr, nikk

@@ -31,0 +31,6 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1500440">副詞</xref>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<gloss>adverb (used in dictionaries)</gloss>
+</sense>

Tightening x-refs.
I don't think sense 2 is [arch]. It's in GG5 and meikyo.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1522630">本社</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1522630">本社・1</xref>
@@ -17,2 +17 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1585720">太鼓持ち</xref>
-<misc>&arch;</misc>
+<xref type="see" seq="1585720">太鼓持ち・1</xref>

無駄	7345062
ムダ	1600823
無駄な	1874553
ムダな	166755

Worth including? I've seen it written like this a few times. We also have 「ムダ毛」.

@@ -19,0 +20,4 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ムダ</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>
+</r_ele>

Let's close this for now. If we want to move adj-na to the front we can do so later (pending the results of the discussion on the 
mailing list).

@@ -20,0 +21 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -22,8 +22,0 @@
-<gloss>futile</gloss>
-<gloss>wasteful</gloss>
-<gloss>useless</gloss>
-<gloss>pointless</gloss>
-<gloss>vain</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>

a topic for the mailing list?

I don't like splitting adj-na/n here because it's very inconsistent with how we usually format our entries. If we decided to always 
split out the various PoS (like GG5 does) that'd be one thing, but as we haven't, I don't really see how this is a special case that 
warrants splitting.
On glossing a single sense like an adj-na or n, I don't have a strong opinion but I don't have an issue with basing it on the most 
common usage. I do feel this is something that needs to be properly formalize in our editing guidelines though, instead of relying 
on editors being aware of "what we usually do in these cases."

gg5

Expunging "draught".

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>preliminary draught</gloss>
+<gloss>abstract</gloss>

@@ -25 +25 @@
-<gloss>folds (e.g of a mountain)</gloss>
+<gloss>folds (e.g. of a mountain)</gloss>

G n-grams:
 襞	 44069
 ひだ	985563  - also a train line
 ヒダ	 88253
 襞を作る 	 29
 ひだを作る	463
 ヒダを作る	189
www-images:
  ひだ  mostly trains
  ヒダ  mostly folds etc

@@ -8,0 +9,4 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ヒダ</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>

mushrooms are not part of botany unless you want to anger systematists

@@ -34 +33,0 @@
-<field>&bot;</field>

Yes, I've since found some refs having 幇間 read "たいこもち: Most have it as ほうかん.
I think it's better to have たいこもち in the 幇間 entry.

Daijs has たいこもち for 幇間 but I imagine it's almost always read ほうかん so splitting is probably a good idea.
Should we keep 幇間 here or not?

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>太鼓持</keb>

Daijr, GG5, etc.

I can see no evidence that 幇間 can be read たいこもち. I think it was a mistaken merge many years ago. I'm proposing the entry be split.

@@ -7,3 +6,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>幇間</keb>
-</k_ele>
@@ -13,4 +9,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>ほうかん</reb>
-<re_restr>幇間</re_restr>
-</r_ele>
@@ -18,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2835571">幇間・ほうかん</xref>
@@ -25 +18,0 @@
-<stagr>たいこもち</stagr>

daij, gg5

I think sense 2 only applies to たいこもち.

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>幇間</keb>
+<keb>太鼓持ち</keb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<keb>太鼓持ち</keb>
+<keb>幇間</keb>
@@ -24,0 +25 @@
+<stagr>たいこもち</stagr>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 妖艶　　 │ 217,489 │ 99.9% │
│ 妖婉　　 │     284 │  0.1% │ - rK (kokugos)
│ ようえん │   6,410 │  N/A  │
╰─ーーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

gg5

@@ -22,0 +23 @@
+<gloss>captivating</gloss>

daijr/s

Added kanji form.

@@ -7,0 +8,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>妖婉</keb>

gg5, daijr

Added sense.
Expunging "draught".

@@ -18,2 +18,6 @@
-<gloss>draught papers</gloss>
-<gloss>callup notice</gloss>
+<gloss>call-up notice</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<s_inf>orig. meaning</s_inf>
+<gloss>red paper</gloss>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -16,0 +17,2 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

gg5, prog

@@ -17,2 +17,2 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<gloss>thick or dense growth</gloss>
+<gloss>growing thickly</gloss>
+<gloss>growing densely</gloss>

Expunging "draught".

@@ -13 +12,0 @@
-<gloss>overdraught</gloss>

Expunging "draught".

@@ -19 +18,0 @@
-<gloss>overdraught</gloss>

meikyo
公用文では「貸越し」。慣用の固定した「貸越金・貸越残高」などは送りがなをつけない。

another one of the cases where it shouldn't be written without okurigana unless it is part of a compound

Daijr, Koj,ngrams

Interesting that the okurigana-free version is the most common. The JEs all have 貸し越し or 貸越し.

@@ -5,0 +5,3 @@
+<keb>貸越</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -6,0 +9,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>貸越し</keb>

GG5 (has a combined entry: "モールスしんごう[ふごう]【モールス信号[符号]】". Other JEs separate.

I think we need both, with distinguishing glosses and xrefs.

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>Morse code</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2835549">モールス信号</xref>
+<gloss>Morse code (esp. the code)</gloss>

jwiki: "モールス符号を使った信号はモールス信号と呼ばれる。"

Technically speaking, they're separate things.

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2835548">モールス信号</xref>

ngrams
モールス信号	1331
モールス符号	680

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2835548">モールス信号</xref>

@@ -34,0 +35 @@
+<s_inf>part of speech tag used in dictionaries</s_inf>

not actually listed as such in daijs or daijs, interestingly. 
but daijs, daijr and nikk all use it, of course.

@@ -31,0 +31,6 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1531570">名詞</xref>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<gloss>noun</gloss>
+</sense>

@@ -25,0 +25,6 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&suf;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2296010">コード名</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2140420">学校名</xref>
+<gloss>name</gloss>
+</sense>

@@ -19,0 +20 @@
+<field>&gramm;</field>

@@ -21 +21 @@
-<s_inf>used in dictionaries</s_inf>
+<s_inf>part of speech tag used in dictionaries</s_inf>

i understand it, but i don't think it's necessary

中辞典

I don't understand that note (which came from Paul Blay in 2008).

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<s_inf>e.g. ing形, etc.</s_inf>
+<xref type="see" seq="1747110">活用形・かつようけい</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1579380">三角形・さんかくけい</xref>

@@ -22,2 +22,2 @@
-<gloss>(true) adjective</gloss>
-<gloss>i-adjective</gloss>
+<gloss>adjective</gloss>
+<gloss>i-adjective (in Japanese)</gloss>

gg5

Expunging "draught".

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>draught horse</gloss>
+<gloss>cart horse</gloss>

Entry created

gg5, prog

The JEs and smaller kokugos have this as 形動 only.
Sankoku describes senses 2 and 3 as 古風.

@@ -18 +17,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -23 +21,0 @@
-<gloss>sincere</gloss>
@@ -27 +24,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -28,0 +26 @@
+<misc>&dated;</misc>
@@ -29,0 +28 @@
+<gloss>well</gloss>
@@ -34,3 +33,2 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="1012210">忠実・ちゅうじつ</xref>
-<misc>&arch;</misc>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<misc>&dated;</misc>
@@ -38 +36,2 @@
-<gloss>devoted</gloss>
+<gloss>honest</gloss>
+<gloss>sincere</gloss>

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<re_nokanji/>

sankoku

@@ -10,0 +11,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>マメ</reb>

I don't think it's on-min

@@ -14 +13,0 @@
-<misc>&on-mim;</misc>

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<s_inf>orig. used to specifically make fun of Koreans, now broader</s_inf>
+<s_inf>orig. used specifically to make fun of Koreans, now broader</s_inf>

transliteration from Google Translate.
Lots of hits for 
ホルホル番組
ホルホル本
examples
https://kaikai.ch/board/26241/
"1933年の日本のホルホル本wwwww"
"世界に輝く日本の偉さはここだ！" (title of the book)
"ホルホル民族大日本人wwwwwww"
_
http://vip.blomaga.jp/articles/32443.html
"ホルホル本の痛さを的確に表現した例えｗｗｗｗｗ"
"世界から嫌われる中国と韓国 感謝される日本" (title of the book)
_
http://jap-land.blog.jp/archives/4176549.html
【悲報】日本人さん、案の定カズオ・イシグロでホルホルしてしまう
_
http://jap-land.blog.jp/archives/4560053.html
"白人Youtuber、日本のホルホル番組の実態を暴露"
"こういうホルホル見る限りやっぱチョンとジャップは精神的兄弟だわ"
"他人が賞取ってホルホルする奴はなぜなのか"

I think this mirrors how it's actually used better (nobody's using it to mean "ehem" in Japanese).
Basically all the hits I get relate to Nihonjin-ron type of stuff.
adj-no? Most frequently used without　の
_
Not sure if it's fair to call it on-mim - the original Korean might have been, but is the translation?

@@ -12,6 +12,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2036530">えへん</xref>
-<lsource xml:lang="kor"/>
-<gloss>ahem</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -21,2 +17,4 @@
-<gloss>self-satisfied laugh</gloss>
-<gloss g_type="expl">allegedly from the way that Koreans laugh in Internet dialogues</gloss>
+<s_inf>orig. used to specifically make fun of Koreans, now broader</s_inf>
+<lsource xml:lang="kor">heolheol</lsource>
+<gloss>self-satisfaction (esp. in a nationalistic sense)</gloss>
+<gloss>smugness</gloss>

Whatever.

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>top prospect</gloss>

Eゲイト英和辞典
used in daijs フロントランナー entry (（競走で）先頭を走る
人。リードしている人。また、選挙などでの最有力候補。)
ngrams

最有力候補	2161
最有力候補者	18

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>leading candidate</gloss>

https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=最有力候補

中辞典, GG5 examples.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>if I could wish for more</gloss>
+<gloss>if one were to wish for more</gloss>

大辞林
http://eikaiwa.dmm.com/uknow/questions/6336/

I don't think that second gloss is needed.

@@ -15,2 +15 @@
-<gloss>something or other</gloss>
-<gloss>unspecified matter</gloss>
+<gloss>something (or other)</gloss>

Eijiro, GG5 examples.

https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=何事か

"その女生徒は早苗の横へ座ると、聞きとれないほどの小さな声で、何ごとか話し始めた・・・・・"

gg5

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&physiol;</field>

More physiology.

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<field>&med;</field>

GG5, etc.

Usual form.

@@ -13 +12,0 @@
-<gloss>growing pain</gloss>

gg5

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 板バネ　 │ 25,975 │ 68.7% │
│ 板ばね　 │ 10,855 │ 28.7% │
│ 板発条　 │      0 │  0.0% │ - rK (daijr/s, koj)
│ いたバネ │    815 │  2.2% │ - drop
│ いたばね │    156 │  0.4% │
╰─ーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -14,4 +14,0 @@
-<reb>いたバネ</reb>
-<re_restr>板バネ</re_restr>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
@@ -19,2 +15,0 @@
-<re_restr>板ばね</re_restr>
-<re_restr>板発条</re_restr>

N-grams:
板ばね	10855
板発条	< 20
板バネ	25975

Reordering.

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>板バネ</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -10,3 +13,4 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>板バネ</keb>
-</k_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>いたバネ</reb>
+<re_restr>板バネ</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
@@ -18,4 +21,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>いたバネ</reb>
-<re_restr>板バネ</re_restr>
-</r_ele>
@@ -24 +24,2 @@
-<gloss>leaf spring, plate spring</gloss>
+<gloss>leaf spring</gloss>
+<gloss>plate spring</gloss>

koj daij gg5

ルミナス

Seems OK.

daij, koj

Not sure how to translate this.

Sound clip in wwwjdic

@@ -1,2 +1 @@
-<ent_seq>1869580</ent_seq>

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos>

"気は確かか" in 実用日本語表現辞典 
"気が確かである" in daijs 現し entry
ngrams

気は確か	206
気は確かだ	1
気は確かか	50
気が確か	73
気が確かか	2
気が確かだ	1
気が確かである

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>気は確かだ</keb>
+<keb>気は確か</keb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>きはたしかだ</reb>
+<reb>きはたしか</reb>
@@ -11 +11 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>

Unidic

https://www.weblio.jp/content/振れ取り

Daijr

Looks fun.

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<field>&sports;</field>

wiki

See 1969170.

@@ -12 +12,5 @@
-<gloss>Morse code</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1969170">モールス符号・モールスふごう</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1969170">モールス符号・モールスふごう</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1969170">モールス符号・モールスふごう</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1969170">モールス符号・モールスふごう</xref>
+<gloss>Morse code (esp. signalling)</gloss>

gg5

daijs (redir to ～符号), prog
ngrams
モールス信号	1331
モールス符号	680

Agreed.

I don't think "comp" is appropriate here. It relates to the web, sure, but it's not a tchnical term.

@@ -10 +9,0 @@
-<field>&comp;</field>

@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+<field>&comp;</field>

ngrams

まとめサイト	2032
纏めサイト	37
https://www.japantimes.co.jp/life/2012/01/18/digital/stealth-marketing-by-companies-is-polluting-online-forums/#.WvFUmJ0zbLY
"However, to sort though the huge number of posts on 2-channel can take time, and these days many people are not actually 
reading directly from 2-channel. Instead they read 2-channel matome (summary) sites and blogs that summarize lengthy 
discussions into short and concise reads."

GG5, ルミナス

Could be split.

https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=観光ガイド

Eij

jitsuyo
ngrams

最低最悪	1348
最悪最低	178
最悪最悪	32
最低最低	11
史上最低最悪の	30
史上最低最悪な	6
最低最悪な	164
最低最悪の	704

"最低最悪の場合"　5 googits
"最低最悪な場合" 4 googits
google first page of results:
"評判どおりの最低最悪なお粗末宿！"
"最低最悪だろうなぁ、サービス業としては。"
"私の20代を最低最悪にした「30の悪習慣」"
"ニアルチのバトルフィールド最低最悪の作戦"
"史上最低最悪の男達に殺された娘"

Does not seem to be used often adverbially or at all as "in the worst case scenario" - searching for "最低最悪どう" on google gets 
120 results and is mostly false hits like 
"自分だけさっさとベルトを締めて出発進行なんてのは最低最悪。どう、為に ..."
"相手はどう考えても最低最悪…どうしたら…"
"体調はもう最低最悪。どう考えても起き上がれない。。。"

Daijr, Koj, GG5, 中辞典, etc.

daij

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>having a hard time getting used to a new place (of children)</gloss>
+<gloss>having a hard time getting used to unfamiliar places (of children)</gloss>

ngrams 63
https://mikle.jp/viewthread/121865/
"行ったことのない場所にいくとグズグズ機嫌が悪くなったりすることを言うと思います..."

daijr, koj

daij, koj

gg5, daijs
G n-grams:
フェイスライン	91256
フェースライン	4209

daijr

Daijs.

I think it's pretty irregular.

@@ -8,0 +9,4 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>たいこもち</reb>
+<re_inf>&ik;</re_inf>

Proposing split from 1585720.

Adding spec1
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<pos>&unc;</pos>
+<misc>&fict;</misc>

ja.starwars.wikia.com/wiki/ドロイド 
1.7m googits