@@ -23 +23 @@
-<gloss>(sound of) voice</gloss>
+<gloss>sound of a voice</gloss>

gg5, daij

At least two senses in the refs.

@@ -22 +22,7 @@
-<gloss>(the concept of) sound</gloss>
+<gloss>speech</gloss>
+<gloss>(sound of) voice</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<stagr>おんせい</stagr>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>sound (e.g. of a TV)</gloss>

gg5, prog

Not [adj-no].

@@ -18,4 +18,4 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<gloss>appearance</gloss>
-<gloss>exterior</gloss>
-<gloss>facade</gloss>
+<gloss>outward appearance</gloss>
+<gloss>exterior appearance</gloss>
+<gloss>outward show</gloss>
+<gloss>looks</gloss>

daijr/s, gg5

Added sense.
I don't think we need an [adj-f] sense.

@@ -16,2 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>opening page of book</gloss>
-<gloss>beginning of an essay</gloss>
+<gloss>beginning (of a book, magazine, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>opening page</gloss>
@@ -20,2 +20,3 @@
-<pos>&adj-f;</pos>
-<gloss>prefatory</gloss>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>beginning (of a matter)</gloss>
+<gloss>start</gloss>

gg5

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>(degree of) risk</gloss>
@@ -15 +16 @@
-<gloss>(level of) danger</gloss>
+<gloss>danger</gloss>

None provided. Cannot see this sense anywhere.
https://www.edrdg.org/wiki/index.php/Editorial_policy#References  "for amendments to existing entries, straightforward suggestions such as spelling changes or rewording of translations need not have references, but more substantial changes must be accompanied by references and/or a case for the change in the Comments field."

@@ -16,4 +15,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>self-preservation</gloss>

@@ -15,0 +16,4 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>self-preservation</gloss>

mk

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

gg5

@@ -17,2 +17,2 @@
-<gloss>measurement</gloss>
-<gloss>computation</gloss>
+<gloss>measuring</gloss>
+<gloss>weighing</gloss>

measure is 測度

@@ -22 +21,0 @@
-<pos>&vs;</pos>
@@ -25 +24 @@
-<gloss>measure</gloss>
+<gloss>distance function</gloss>

G n-grams 1923688

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -8,0 +10 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

gg5

@@ -17,2 +17,2 @@
-<gloss>blood relations</gloss>
-<gloss>kinsmen</gloss>
+<gloss>blood relative</gloss>
+<gloss>kinsman</gloss>

daijr

@@ -19,0 +20,5 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>flesh and bone</gloss>
+<gloss>(one's) body</gloss>
+</sense>

@@ -19,0 +20 @@
+<misc>&arch;</misc>

daijr, daijs, nikk: https://kotobank.jp/word/柵-68672
shinmeikai: （二）〔古〕 とりで。

@@ -17,0 +18,4 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>fortress</gloss>
+</sense>

G n-grams
柵	923735	  
柵の	151752	    
柵を	129434	  
柵が	99729	  
柵に	85703

also 10 tatoeba examples

@@ -6,2 +6 @@
-<ke_pri>news2</ke_pri>
-<ke_pri>nf35</ke_pri>
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -11,2 +10 @@
-<re_pri>news2</re_pri>
-<re_pri>nf35</re_pri>
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

新和英中辞典, Luminous

@@ -18,0 +18,1 @@
+<gloss>railing</gloss>

G n-grams 斬る	1119797

@@ -7,0 +8 @@
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -12,0 +14 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

@@ -16,0 +16,1 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

we've been weird about including or not including 旧字体.  there was a period when we accepted them regardless.  this seems fair, although i still think it would be best to have the general rule of not including them at all.  (just having a separate table that maps 旧字体 to modern kanji so that lookup software can implement it)

gg5

We don't generally include 旧字体 unless they're still used in contemporary Japanese. Those n-gram counts suggest that 嶄新 is obsolete.

@@ -25,0 +26 @@
+<gloss>innovative</gloss>

@@ -25 +25 @@
-<gloss>newness</gloss>
+<gloss>new</gloss>

GG5: 	the 「place [city, town, village] one 「is [comes, hails] from; one's native 
place; one's hometown; one's birthplace.
中辞典: one's home; one's hometown; one's home city [village]; one's birthplace

I agree. I've expanded it a bit.

@@ -14 +14,3 @@
-<gloss>birthplace</gloss>
+<gloss>the place one comes from</gloss>
+<gloss>one's birthplace</gloss>
+<gloss>one's hometown</gloss>

I recommend removing the definition "native place". It is not an idiomatic phrase used in American English or British English. That phrase seems to only occur in Indian English and is considered incorrect in 
American English and British English.

@@ -15 +14,0 @@
-<gloss>native place</gloss>

G n-grams 2001451

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -8,0 +10 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

kenkyuusha

@@ -29,0 +30,2 @@
+<gloss>fairly</gloss>
+<gloss>quite</gloss>

gg5
daijs: "ふさわしい程度を超えているさま。また、いちじるしいさま。並でないさま。過分。相当。「随分な御見舞をいただきました」「貯金も随分な額になった」"
meikyo: "並でないさま。いちじるしいさま。「寄付金が─な額になった」"

More glosses.
Daijs and meikyo have a second [adj-na] sense.

@@ -30,0 +31,2 @@
+<gloss>awfully</gloss>
+<gloss>terribly</gloss>
@@ -34,0 +37,2 @@
+<gloss>terrible</gloss>
+<gloss>horrid</gloss>
@@ -37,0 +42,6 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>remarkable</gloss>
+<gloss>extraordinary</gloss>
+</sense>

I think it would be too.

@@ -33,0 +34 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

Bulk update n-adv to n,adv
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<pos>&n-adv;</pos>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>

I don't think "between two and six times" works as a gloss. It would never be translated like that. Also, it's not as though 数回 never refers to 7+ times.

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<gloss>few times</gloss>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>between two and six times</gloss>
+<gloss>a few times</gloss>

G n-grams 1866503

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -8,0 +10 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

G n-grams 1822143

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -8,0 +10 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

G n-grams 2057522

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -11,0 +13 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

Tanaka: 33 ２回

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>２回</keb>

not in any of my sources

https://ejje.weblio.jp/content/二口目

It comes up on weblio as 'pet expression' but that means nothing really and it doesn't have an explanation in japanese.
It doesn't have an entry on kotobank or google dic.

daijr, daijs, nikk: https://kotobank.jp/word/某-486627

@@ -17,0 +18,9 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&pn;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1519690">某・それがし・2</xref>
+<misc>&arch;</misc>
+<misc>&hum;</misc>
+<misc>&male;</misc>
+<gloss>I</gloss>
+<gloss>me</gloss>
+</sense>

very common

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -8,0 +10 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

As in 本番運用.

@@ -45 +45 @@
-<gloss>production (environment)</gloss>
+<gloss>production environment</gloss>

https://developer.salesforce.com/docs/atlas.ja-jp.214.0.dev_lifecycle.meta/dev_lifecycle/lifecycle_multi_prod.htm

@@ -38,0 +39,7 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2857396">本番環境</xref>
+<field>&comp;</field>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<gloss>production (environment)</gloss>

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<gloss>performance (as opposed to practise)</gloss>
+<gloss>performance (as opposed to practice)</gloss>

Quiet, self-approving

https://www.kanjipedia.jp/kanji/0006714800

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ー─┬────────────╮
│ 麺 │ 11,220,420 │
│ 麵 │      5,001 │ - add, oK (kyūji)
│ 麪 │      2,516 │ - rK (daijr/s; itaiji)
╰─ー─┴────────────╯

@@ -10,0 +11,4 @@
+<keb>麵</keb>
+<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -11,0 +16 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

G n-grams
麺	11220420	  
麺は	 1072123	  
麺の	 980054

@@ -7,0 +8 @@
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -15,0 +17 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

i strongly suspect this is not used with this meaning as a standalone word anymore

@@ -22,0 +23 @@
+<misc>&arch;</misc>

Ok, let's be more precise here:
広辞苑 has:
1. 小麦粉。うどん粉。
2. 粉を練ったものを細長く切った食品。うどん・そばなどの総称。「昼食は―にする」
国語大辞典 has:
１ 小麦粉。麦粉。うどん粉。
２ うどん・索麺(そうめん)などの総称。麺類。
These are not from the kanji entries but from the word definitions.

@@ -20,0 +21,4 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>flour</gloss>
+</sense>

G n-grams:
捉える	846468
捕らえる	167817
捕える	 23479
--
捉え	2486170
捕らえ	 623064
捕え	  91983

reordering
adding spec1 to 捉える

@@ -3,0 +4,6 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>捉える</keb>
+<ke_pri>news2</ke_pri>
+<ke_pri>nf46</ke_pri>
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
+</k_ele>
@@ -14,5 +19,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>捉える</keb>
-<ke_pri>news2</ke_pri>
-<ke_pri>nf46</ke_pri>
-</k_ele>
@@ -24,0 +26 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

gg5, prog, daijr/s

Added sense.

@@ -28,0 +29,2 @@
+<gloss>to catch</gloss>
+<gloss>to capture</gloss>
@@ -30 +31,0 @@
-<gloss>to capture</gloss>
@@ -31,0 +33,2 @@
+<gloss>to grab</gloss>
+<gloss>to catch hold of</gloss>
@@ -36 +39 @@
-<gloss>to grasp</gloss>
+<gloss>to grasp (e.g. meaning)</gloss>
@@ -38 +41,7 @@
-<gloss>to treat (as)</gloss>
+<gloss>to capture (e.g. features)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>to captivate</gloss>
+<gloss>to move (one's heart)</gloss>

捕らえる is about four times as common as 捕える (according to Google).  It also is much better represented in the Tanaka corpus.  I suggest switching headword order around.

@@ -4,4 +4,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>捕える</keb>
-<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>
-</k_ele>
@@ -13,0 +9,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>捕える</keb>
+<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

I think "one" does look better here.

@@ -19,5 +19,5 @@
-<gloss>a round</gloss>
-<gloss>a circuit</gloss>
-<gloss>a revolution</gloss>
-<gloss>a lap</gloss>
-<gloss>a turn</gloss>
+<gloss>one round</gloss>
+<gloss>one circuit</gloss>
+<gloss>one revolution</gloss>
+<gloss>one lap</gloss>
+<gloss>one turn</gloss>

I think it'd OK. The meaning is clear.

Shouldn't all these "a" be replaced with "one"?

restoring missing tags

@@ -11,0 +12,3 @@
+<re_pri>ichi1</re_pri>
+<re_pri>news1</re_pri>
+<re_pri>nf13</re_pri>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>beginning of a book or scroll</gloss>
+<gloss>beginning (of a scroll, book, etc.)</gloss>

G n-grams 1951055

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -11,0 +13 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>３年</keb>

I completely missed that there was a long discussion below. If everyone settled on [obs], then there's probably no reason to relitigate.

Sankoku and daijirin say that 認知症 was proposed as a replacement for 痴呆症 in 2004.

https://www.edrdg.org/wiki/index.php/Editorial_policy
>> "obs" (obsolete). This is typically used for terms that were in use in the Meiji and early Showa periods, but are no longer in general use, e.g. they have been supplanted by another term.

Just going by the date ranges assigned to [arch] and [obs], I would have tagged this entry as [dated] rather than [obs].

Probably shouldn't have freq tags on an obs-tagged term.

@@ -6,2 +5,0 @@
-<ke_pri>news2</ke_pri>
-<ke_pri>nf37</ke_pri>
@@ -11,2 +8,0 @@
-<re_pri>news2</re_pri>
-<re_pri>nf37</re_pri>

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<field>&med;</field>

OK, let's make it "obs". I agree we need clearer guidelines for the tag.

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<misc>&obs;</misc>

Let's close this with an arch for now. I tried raising the issue on the mailing list on April 6 but there wasn't much response.

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<misc>&arch;</misc>

It's not mentioned in the policy document, but when we 
discussed this on the mailing list in 2012, Jim 
suggested that:
"if the term was really only used in the Edo period or 
earlier,
it should be marked "arch".
- if the term was used up to, say. early Showa, but is 
no longer
current, it should be marked "obs". (ウンシャン from 
"unschön"
is an example - it was a Meiji-to-early-Showa term)"
Maybe this should be discussed again on the mailing 
list.

We have a lot of other entries tagged [arch] that have examples from the Meiji era.
I don't think this word is ever used nowadays except in the form 如才ない. I'd argue that makes it [arch].

The two examples in daijr are from 1692 and 江戸後期, but 
the first daijs example is from 1895 e.g. well into Meiji 
(Meiji 28). 「お前に―は有るまいけれど」

@@ -17 +16,0 @@
-<misc>&arch;</misc>

daij, koj

The existing glosses were for 如才ない, which has the complete opposite meaning.
Appears to be [arch].

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>如在</keb>
@@ -12,11 +15,7 @@
-<gloss>affable</gloss>
-<gloss>slick</gloss>
-<gloss>smooth-tongued</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>smart</gloss>
-<gloss>sharp</gloss>
-<gloss>clever</gloss>
-<gloss>skillful</gloss>
-<gloss>adroit</gloss>
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1762340">如才ない</xref>
+<misc>&arch;</misc>
+<gloss>sloppiness</gloss>
+<gloss>carelessness</gloss>
+<gloss>inattention</gloss>
+<gloss>oversight</gloss>

daij gg5 さめる examples

@@ -25 +25,2 @@
-<gloss>to awaken</gloss>
+<gloss>to wake up</gloss>
+<gloss>to awake</gloss>
@@ -27 +28,8 @@
-<gloss>to snap out (of something)</gloss>
+<gloss>to snap out (of a day dream, etc.)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
+<gloss>to awaken (to the truth, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>to come to a realization</gloss>
+<gloss>to come to one's senses</gloss>

Wierd. Fixed.

There are two 目が覚めて and one 目が覚める that have been tagged が

@@ -9,3 +9,0 @@
-<keb>眼が覚める</keb>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
@@ -16,0 +13,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>眼が覚める</keb>

G n-grams 4402632

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -8,0 +10 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

Entry created

I think this sounds more natural.

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<s_inf>the city name is officially written with hiragana</s_inf>
+<s_inf>the city name is officially written in hiragana</s_inf>

I guess so. It's an odd case.

Does this work?

@@ -14,2 +14,2 @@
-<misc>&uk;</misc>
-<gloss>Saitama (city)</gloss>
+<s_inf>the city name is officially written with hiragana</s_inf>
+<gloss>Saitama (city, prefecture)</gloss>

I think so.

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

G n-grams:
 埼玉	10779034
 さいたま	 6128710
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saitama,_Saitama

The official name of the city is さいたま, not 埼玉.
Should we mark the entry as [uk]?

not even in eijiro

A+B.

Entry created

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cassock

Not a type of cassock, just the French word for cassock.
I can't find any evidence for the "stern" sense. Dropping it.

@@ -10,5 +10,2 @@
-<gloss>soutane (a type of cassock worn by Roman Catholic priests)</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>stern</gloss>
+<gloss>soutane</gloss>
+<gloss>cassock</gloss>

@@ -10 +10 @@
-<gloss>soutane</gloss>
+<gloss>soutane (a type of cassock worn by Roman Catholic priests)</gloss>

Entry created

@@ -9 +9 @@
-<lsource xml:lang="fre"/>
+<lsource xml:lang="fre">soutane</lsource>

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cassock

Not a type of cassock, just the French word for cassock.
I can't find any evidence for the "stern" sense. Dropping it.

@@ -10,5 +10,2 @@
-<gloss>soutane (a type of cassock worn by Roman Catholic priests)</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>stern</gloss>
+<gloss>soutane</gloss>
+<gloss>cassock</gloss>

@@ -10 +10 @@
-<gloss>soutane</gloss>
+<gloss>soutane (a type of cassock worn by Roman Catholic priests)</gloss>

Entry created

Aligning with 広島/ヒロシマ.

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<s_inf>ナガサキ esp. when referring to the 1945 atomic bombing</s_inf>
@@ -20,5 +20,0 @@
-<sense>
-<stagr>ナガサキ</stagr>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>atomic bombing of Nagasaki</gloss>
-</sense>

Is there really a case for sense 2?

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<gloss>Nagasaki (city)</gloss>
+<gloss>Nagasaki (city, prefecture)</gloss>

G n-grams 6475465

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -8,0 +10 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/長崎市への原子爆弾投下
長崎県、長崎市などを指す「長崎」が「ナガサキ」とカタカナで表記される場合は長崎市への原爆投下を指すことが多い。

http://d.hatena.ne.jp/keyword/�ʥ�����
特に被爆地としての長崎市が語られる場合、（ヒロシマと共に）片仮名で「ナガサキ」と記述されることが多い。

potential upgrade from enamdict for historical signficance.  ナガサキ should be handled in any case (though google image hits are not as supportive as in the case of ヒロシマ)

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<gloss>Nara (city)</gloss>
+<gloss>Nara (city, prefecture)</gloss>

G n-grams 6341959

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -8,0 +10 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

Just "n" for places.

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<pos>&n-pr;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&n-pr;</pos>

Deserves to be in main dict due to cultural and historical significance

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<gloss>LDP-blamer</gloss>

I think it's fine as an entry. If I encounter ジミンガー I 
want to look it up. (Would prefer JIS-compatible 
characters.)

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<s_inf>from 自民が…; used to mock critics of the LDP</s_inf>
+<s_inf>from 自民が ..; used to mock critics of the LDP</s_inf>

>"ジミンガー doesn't actually mean "blaming things on the Liberal Democratic Party of Japan". It's just an expression used to mock those who criticise the LDP."

When people say things like "またジミンガーかよ" or "なぜ4条改正反対なのか、何故憲法改正反対なのか、ジミンガーを使わずに述べてほしい。", I think "blaming things on the LDP" 
is a perfectly fair translation. It's not great when it's used like this, though: "ジミンガー言う前に自身の“変態報道”& #偏向報道 を省みなさい！" I've tried revising it 
a little.
_
>" a beginner learner or someone who isn't familiar with Japanese politics would have no idea what it means"

I'm not a beginner learner and I'm familiar with Japanese politics but I was stumped when I saw this (as 悪性ジミンガ病 or sth like that). I'm sure lots of Japanese 
people who aren't on 2ch or discuss politics on twitter (i.e. the vast majority) would have no idea what it meant either (with or without the 病). Case in point, I 
just showed one of the ジミンガー tweets to a native speaker, and their interpretation was "地味な人ってこと？"

I don't know that I would necessarily be opposed to including something like "but her e-mails" but one obvious difference is that this isn't actually stylized as 
"自民が・・・" where it's obvious what's intended and what each word is, i.e. it's as if "but her e-mails" were commonly stylized as "bthereemelz".

@@ -15,2 +15,2 @@
-<s_inf>from 自民党が…</s_inf>
-<gloss>blaming things on the Liberal Democratic Party of Japan</gloss>
+<s_inf>from 自民が…; used to mock critics of the LDP</s_inf>
+<gloss>it's the Liberal Democratic Party of Japan's fault</gloss>

Perhaps not plenty more, but I don't consider this the sort of thing appropriate for a dictionary anyway.

ジミンガー doesn't actually mean "blaming things on the Liberal Democratic Party of Japan". It's just an expression used to mock those who criticise the LDP.

It would be like adding "But her emails" to an E->J dictionary.

I think we can safely ignore it. Sure, a beginner learner or someone who isn't familiar with Japanese politics would have no idea what it means, but dictionaries don't need to cover every bit of written language.

Adding yoji tags based on gakken, shinmeikai and-or jitenon
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<misc>&yoji;</misc>

Yoji?

daij wiki

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>１０００万</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -11,0 +15,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>一〇〇〇万</keb>

Aligning

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<gloss>10,000,000</gloss>
@@ -19 +19,0 @@
-<gloss>10,000,000</gloss>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/10000000

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>１千万</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -8 +11 @@
-<keb>１千万</keb>
+<keb>１０００００００</keb>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Isao Takahata (1935.10.29-2018.04.05)</gloss>
+<gloss>Isao Takahata (1935.10.29-2018.04.05), director</gloss>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Takahata Isao (1935.10-)</gloss>
+<gloss>Isao Takahata (1935.10.29-2018.04.05)</gloss>