wisdom

Align with 1667510

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<gloss>driving licence</gloss>

G n-grams 934516

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -8,0 +10 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

gg5

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<gloss>leverage</gloss>

G n-grams: 1091097

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -8,0 +10 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

Clout is too informal for this, I think.

@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@
+<gloss>influence</gloss>

G n-grams 28081092

@@ -7,0 +8 @@
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -12,0 +14 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

All the examples are sense 1.

daij, 中辞典

Two senses in the kokugos.
I think "one's father's occupation" is confusing.

@@ -17,4 +17,6 @@
-<gloss>trade</gloss>
-<gloss>occupation</gloss>
-<gloss>line of work</gloss>
-<gloss>one's father's occupation</gloss>
+<gloss>family trade</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>one's occupation</gloss>
+<gloss>one's trade</gloss>

GG5, etc.

I'll demote that original gloss.

@@ -16,1 +16,0 @@
-<gloss>one's father's occupation</gloss>
@@ -21,0 +20,1 @@
+<gloss>one's father's occupation</gloss>

新和英中辞典, ルミナス和英辞典, Eijiro

@@ -17,0 +17,4 @@
+<gloss>family business</gloss>
+<gloss>trade</gloss>
+<gloss>occupation</gloss>
+<gloss>line of work</gloss>

G n-grams 1747322

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -8,0 +10 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

gg5, prog, daij

I don't think "commerce" is right.

@@ -20 +19,0 @@
-<gloss>commerce</gloss>
@@ -21,0 +21,2 @@
+<gloss>profession</gloss>
+<gloss>job</gloss>

G n-grams 1051587

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -8,0 +10 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

G n-grams 1988683

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -8,0 +10 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

Refs are conflicted about transitivity. I guess it can be both.

[vi]: shinmeikai, meikyo
[vt]: oukoku

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
| 丸儲け　　 | 50,036 | 75.9% |
| 丸もうけ　 |  4,134 |  6.3% |
| まる儲け　 |  3,242 |  4.9% |
| まるもうけ |  8,486 | 12.9% |

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
| 　丸儲けし　 | 499 |
| を丸儲けし　 |  97 |
| 　丸儲けする | 351 |
| を丸儲けする |  20 |

@@ -18,0 +19,2 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

I think they're two different things, but let's close it.

My bad, I wasn't aware that "clear profit" meant "a profit 
after all expenses have been paid", I just assumed it meant 
"obvious profit". Maybe they don't need to be split into 
two senses?

@@ -20,4 +19,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<pos>&vs;</pos>

まる儲け	3242 (in GG5 example)
GG5: a clear 「gain [profit]. ～する make [realize, get] a clear 「gain [profit]《of 100,000 yen》.
中辞典: 《make》 a clear profit ¶彼は 30 万円丸もうけした. He made a clean profit of 300,000 yen.
ルミナス: (まるまるの利益) clear profit [C]; (元手や費用なしで得るもうけ) profit 「gained [made] without funds and charges
Daijr: 元手がかからず、収入が全部もうけであること。

From the JEs I'd say it now commonly means making a good profit, although originally it meant there was no initial investment.

@@ -9,0 +10,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>まる儲け</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -16 +19,6 @@
-<gloss>great profit (which doesn't require any investment)</gloss>
+<gloss>clear profit</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<gloss>great profit (without any investment)</gloss>

G n-grams 782333

@@ -7,0 +8 @@
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -12,0 +14 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

I think it's potentially confusing to not split senses here, 
even if the kokugo's don't.

@@ -16,0 +16,1 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1270380">御社・1</xref>
@@ -17,1 +18,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1270380">御社・1</xref>
@@ -21,0 +21,4 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&hon;</misc>

see comment on 御社

@@ -16,0 +16,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1270380">御社</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1270380">御社</xref>
@@ -17,1 +19,3 @@
-<gloss>(your) company</gloss>
+<s_inf>written style</s_inf>
+<gloss>your company</gloss>
+<gloss>your shrine</gloss>

gg5, prog

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>point in common</gloss>

G n-grams 790140

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -8,0 +10 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

A note is fine. I think. I was wanting to avoid "charm".

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<s_inf>spoken to ward off misfortune</s_inf>
@@ -22 +22,0 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">spoken to ward off misfortune</gloss>

I think "charm spoken to ward off misfortune" is an explanatory gloss whereas "spoken to ward off misfortune" is a usage note.

To me, "spoken to ward off misfortune" is a usage note, 
not an expl. A test I suggested on the mailing list: "(I 
think) an expl should be able to be used as a (wordy) 
stand-alone translation of the word, e.g. 'I like two-
person comedy acts' doesn't look too off as a 
translation of  '漫才が好き'"
That's just my suggestion, though.

Daijr, GG5, etc.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knocking_on_wood

I think these spoken phrases are not really charms. To me it's really an explanatory gloss.

@@ -17 +16,0 @@
-<s_inf>charm to ward off lightning and misfortune</s_inf>
@@ -19,0 +19,2 @@
+<gloss>heaven forbid</gloss>
+<gloss>God help me</gloss>
@@ -20,0 +22 @@
+<gloss g_type="expl">spoken to ward off misfortune</gloss>

Having "charm..." as an expl rather than a note opens up 
for misunderstandings, I think (くわばらくわばら is not an 
omamori type of lucky charm)

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<s_inf>charm to ward off lightning and misfortune</s_inf>
@@ -20 +20,0 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">charm to ward off lightning and misfortune</gloss>

G n-grams 1410606

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -8,0 +10 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

1) http://home.alc.co.jp/db/owa/bdicn_sch?w=agreement
.
2) 本契約は、本契約で取り扱われた事項に関する当事者間のすべての了解と合意を規定するものであり。
This Agreement sets forth the entire understanding and agreement between the parties as to the matters 
covered herein
.
3) Agreement（契約・契約書） シリーズの最初はなんと言ってもこの言葉Agreementです。この言葉は一般の辞書では、「意見の一致、同意、合
意、協定、契約、条約、調和、  ...

@@ -13,0 +13,1 @@
+<gloss>agreement</gloss>

G n-grams 1796457

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -8,0 +10 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

G n-grams 1724051

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -8,0 +10 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

G-ngrams 1728905

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -8,0 +10 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

OK

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -18,5 +19,4 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>fair</gloss>
-<gloss>impartial</gloss>
-<gloss>just</gloss>
-<gloss>objective</gloss>
+<gloss>fairness</gloss>
+<gloss>impartiality</gloss>
+<gloss>justice</gloss>
+<gloss>objectivity</gloss>

G n-grams:
公平を	51091
公平さを	10432
--
公平が	11016
公平さが	2654

I think noun glosses are preferable when noun usage is reasonably common.

GG5 has a quite a few 公平を examples and 公平 (as a noun) is significantly more common than 公平さ.

G n-grams:
公平	1563820	  
公平な	 514667	  
公平に	 229869	 
公平で	  76143	
公平を	  51091
公平さ	  33809
公平の	  36875

reverting to adj

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
@@ -18,5 +19,4 @@
-<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
-<gloss>fairness</gloss>
-<gloss>impartiality</gloss>
-<gloss>justice</gloss>
-<gloss>objectivity</gloss>
+<gloss>fair</gloss>
+<gloss>impartial</gloss>
+<gloss>just</gloss>
+<gloss>objective</gloss>

N-grams

Adjectival usage seems dominant.

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
@@ -18 +18,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
@@ -20 +20 @@
-<gloss>high price</gloss>
+<gloss>highly priced</gloss>

I would not mind splitting into a [n] and an [adj-na] sense
and keeping these proposed glosses

@@ -20,0 +21,3 @@
+<gloss>expensive</gloss>
+<gloss>valuable</gloss>
+<gloss>costly</gloss>

daij

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -18 +19 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="ant" seq="1153740">安価</xref>

gg5, daij, meikyo
些細	1057783
瑣細	338

Not a noun.

@@ -6,0 +7,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>瑣細</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -14 +17,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -15,0 +19 @@
+<gloss>trifling</gloss>
@@ -16,0 +21 @@
+<gloss>insignificant</gloss>

G n-grams
 些細	1057783
 ささい	 270965

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -8,0 +10 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

gg5, daij

Don't agree with "mistake".

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<gloss>disaster</gloss>
@@ -14 +14,0 @@
-<gloss>mistake</gloss>

G n-grams 1175386

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -8,0 +10 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

G n-grams 14577828

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -8,0 +10 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

gg5

original seems fine

@@ -15,0 +15,1 @@
+<gloss>raising children</gloss>

@@ -13,1 +13,3 @@
-<gloss>raising children</gloss>
+<gloss>child rearing</gloss>
+<gloss>child raising</gloss>
+<gloss>parenting</gloss>

G n-grams 私自身	3168180

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -8,0 +10 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&pn;</pos>

G n-grams 1385527

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -8,0 +10 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

G n-grams 751811

@@ -7,0 +8 @@
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -12,0 +14 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

G n-grams 2151888

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -8,0 +10 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

G n-grams 3944456

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -8,0 +10 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

gg5

@@ -19,0 +20,2 @@
+<gloss>convention</gloss>
+<gloss>agreement</gloss>

A+B.

G n-grams 2829401

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -8,0 +10 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

老爺	12542

老爺 is rather marginal. If it's only sense 2 it's probably best left in its own.

親父	2953915	31.1%
親爺	126179	1.3%
親仁	6774	0.1%
おやじ	3079537	32.4%
オヤジ	3325151	35.0%


うちに親父	462	2.7%
うちのおやじ	4111	24.4%
うちのオヤジ	12304	72.9%
(i.e. this is the father sense rather than "false hits" for 老爺 geezer)

not 100% sure uk applies to all senses but...

I wonder if 老爺 shouldn't be merged in here?

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -14,0 +16 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -28,0 +31 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -36,0 +40 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -43,0 +48 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -48,0 +54 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -53,0 +60 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

meikyo: しん‐ぷ【親父】〘名〙〔文〕父親。「御━様によろしく」

親父 can be read しんぷ. I'll make a new entry for it.

I agree. I'll put 老爺/ろうや into its own entry. しんぷ belongs with 神父 - a different sort of father.

@@ -14,3 +13,0 @@
-<keb>老爺</keb>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
@@ -25,8 +21,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>ろうや</reb>
-<re_restr>老爺</re_restr>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>しんぷ</reb>
-<re_restr>親父</re_restr>

gg5, prog, daij, meikyo

Splitting into senses.
I think 老爺 and しんぷ should be split out. There's almost no overlap. Shinmeikai is the only ref that says おやじ can be written as 老爺.

@@ -33,0 +34,4 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>オヤジ</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>
+</r_ele>
@@ -35,0 +40 @@
+<misc>&fam;</misc>
@@ -36,0 +42,8 @@
+<gloss>one's old man</gloss>
+<gloss>dad</gloss>
+<gloss>pops</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&fam;</misc>
+<gloss>middle-aged (or older) man</gloss>
@@ -37,0 +51,5 @@
+<gloss>geezer</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&fam;</misc>
@@ -38,0 +57,10 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>proprietor (of a restaurant, store, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>landlord</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<dial>&hob;</dial>
+<gloss>grizzly bear</gloss>

Thanks

https://www.city.beppu.oita.jp/seikatu/todokede_syoumei/kakusyusyoumei/detail11.html
https://www.city.miyazaki.miyazaki.jp/life/resident/procedure/302243.html
https://www.mhlw.go.jp/jouhou/hogo06/

Added information, for the record: a few references for the second sense.

GG5, etc.

The refs only have the invoice sense.

@@ -15 +15,2 @@
-<gloss>job invoice</gloss>
+<gloss>account</gloss>
+<gloss>invoice</gloss>
@@ -19 +20 @@
-<gloss>application form (to request information)</gloss>
+<gloss>information request form</gloss>

https://www.city.ishigaki.okinawa.jp/kurashi_gyosei/kurashi/todokede_toroku_shomei/2411.html
https://www.city.shima.mie.jp/material/files/group/19/kosekiseikyusyo20190501.pdf
https://www.city.kita.tokyo.jp/koseki/documents/yusoyokosekisyomeisyonokohuseikyusyo.pdf
https://www.city.aisai.lg.jp/contents_detail.php?co=kak&frmId=11273
https://www.city.katori.lg.jp/download/toroku/shimin001.html
etc.

At least in North Amercia "application form" connotates jobs, university courses, participatory activities/events, licences or permissions, etc., while in the case of 請求書 the meaning is different and specific, I think we may want to add something along the lines of "to request information"

@@ -16,0 +17,4 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>application form (to request information)</gloss>
+</sense>

G n-grams 1770459

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -8,0 +10 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

G n-grams 1410217

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -8,0 +10 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

not necessarily "to be washed" - 洗濯物を干す

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>clothes to be washed</gloss>
+<gloss>laundry</gloss>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

gg5

I don't think "laying down" is a good gloss.

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<gloss>fitting</gloss>
@@ -20 +21 @@
-<gloss>laying down</gloss>
+<gloss>putting on</gloss>

daijr: "相場や物価が引き続いて上がること"

@@ -13,2 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>continued advance</gloss>
-<gloss>spiral upward</gloss>
+<gloss>continued advance (in market price)</gloss>
+<gloss>continued rise</gloss>

I think that gloss should lead.

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>great success</gloss>
@@ -15 +15,0 @@
-<gloss>great success</gloss>

GG5

https://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/word/en/大成功/#clj-1221002
https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=大成功

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<gloss>great success</gloss>

G n-grams 797654

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -8,0 +10 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

G n-grams 998914

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -8,0 +10 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

Adding sK/sk forms.

@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

函 is jinmeiyou

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
| 投函　　 | 626,376 | 96.7% |
| 投かん　 |   3,791 |  0.6% |
| とうかん |  17,281 |  2.7% |

HiddenForm 投かん

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

G-ngrams
投函	626376
投かん	  3791
とうかん	  17281

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -11,0 +13 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

おｋ

@@ -34 +33,0 @@
-<misc>&euph;</misc>

I think that usage has become so ubiquitous that it probably isn't considered particularly euphemistic any more.

maybe?

@@ -33,0 +34 @@
+<misc>&euph;</misc>

https://www.city.miyazaki.miyazaki.jp/fs/4/2/7/6/9/8/_/413586.pdf
日本語が不自由な外国人

It feels a little weird to have "inability" and "disability" in the same sense.

@@ -33,0 +34 @@
+<gloss>inability</gloss>
@@ -35,0 +37 @@
+<gloss>nonfluency (in a language)</gloss>

daij, koj

None of the kokugos consider this a pronoun. I don't think we should either.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<pos>&pn;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<gloss>our company</gloss>
@@ -16 +16,0 @@
-<gloss>our company</gloss>

Bulk update: deletion of adj-noBulk update: deletion of adj-no
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -14 +13,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

G n-grams 12960366

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -8,0 +10 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

@@ -14 +14,2 @@
-<gloss>our firm (company)</gloss>
+<gloss>our firm</gloss>
+<gloss>our company</gloss>

gg5

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<gloss>famous person</gloss>

G n-grams 6747196

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -8,0 +10 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

新和英中辞典
GG5
Genius WaEi

@@ -12,0 +13,2 @@
+<gloss>public figure</gloss>
+<gloss>big name</gloss>

子犬	2,167,952	80.2%	
仔犬	448,989	16.6%	
小犬	61,316	2.3%	
子いぬ	8,721	0.3%	
仔いぬ	261	0.0%	
子イヌ	15,161	0.6%	
仔イヌ	402	0.0%

@@ -12,0 +13,8 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>子いぬ</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>子イヌ</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

Daijr

As suggested by Robin in 2573310.

@@ -21,0 +22,4 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>small dog</gloss>
+</sense>

G n-grams
子犬	2167952
仔犬	 448989
小犬	 61316

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -14,0 +16 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

daij, gg5

Indeed. I'll make a new entry for 刺し違える.

@@ -15 +14,0 @@
-<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -17,0 +17,7 @@
+<gloss>to put in the wrong place</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<field>&sumo;</field>
+<gloss>to make a mistake in deciding the winner</gloss>

刺し違える (to stab each other) is a completely different thing, right? So I'm removing it from here.

@@ -6,3 +5,0 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>刺し違える</keb>
@@ -21 +17,0 @@
-<gloss>to stab at each other</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 痛ましい　 │ 127,732 │ 91.3% │
│ 傷ましい　 │   2,232 │  1.6% │ 🡠 rK (daijr/s, koj, etc.)
│ いたましい │   9,893 │  7.1% │
╰─ーーーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

gg5, prog

@@ -25 +25,2 @@
-<gloss>tragical</gloss>
+<gloss>tragic</gloss>
+<gloss>sad</gloss>

@@ -15 +14,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2169460">ぐしょ濡れ</xref>

gg5, prog

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -14 +14,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<gloss>dripping wet</gloss>
@@ -18 +19,2 @@
-<gloss>wet to the skin</gloss>
+<gloss>drenched</gloss>
+<gloss>soaked</gloss>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

daijr: "取引市場で，相場が引き続いて上がる"

Not just any rise.

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss>continuous rise</gloss>
+<gloss>continuous rise (in market price)</gloss>

G n-grams 1292104

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -8,0 +10 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

I think so.

Not in my refs
However there are 32 tagged examples in Tanaka
Might as well let it stay

[noun]+中

G n-grams 752044

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -8,0 +10 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

gg5

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>a treaty power</gloss>
+<gloss>treaty power</gloss>
+<gloss>treaty signatory</gloss>

gg5 koj daijs
G n-grams: 6160864

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -8,0 +10 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>
@@ -12 +14,2 @@
-<gloss>vacation abroad</gloss>
+<gloss>trip abroad</gloss>
+<gloss>overseas travel</gloss>

daij, koj, gg5, prog

Sense 3 is not the original meaning.

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss>impression (of a person)</gloss>
+<gloss>manner (towards others)</gloss>
@@ -21,4 +21,4 @@
-<s_inf>orig. meaning</s_inf>
-<gloss>most impressive passage</gloss>
-<gloss>highlight</gloss>
-<gloss>punch line</gloss>
+<gloss>most impressive part</gloss>
+<gloss>best part</gloss>
+<gloss>high point</gloss>
+<gloss>climax</gloss>

Retaining the old order. New sense is not in the JEs.

@@ -20,0 +21,7 @@
+<s_inf>orig. meaning</s_inf>
+<gloss>most impressive passage</gloss>
+<gloss>highlight</gloss>
+<gloss>punch line</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -24,6 +30,0 @@
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<s_inf>orig. meaning</s_inf>
-<gloss>most impressive passage</gloss>
-<gloss>punch line</gloss>
-</sense>

大辞泉

@@ -20,0 +21,6 @@
+<misc>&col;</misc>
+<gloss>beginning</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<s_inf>orig. meaning</s_inf>

I think so.

Not in my refs
However there are 32 tagged examples in Tanaka
Might as well let it stay

Just [noun]+中.

G n-grams 791136

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -8,0 +10 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

G n-grams 1139019

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -8,0 +10 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

@@ -14 +13,0 @@
-<gloss>a murder</gloss>

G n-grams 1263222

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -8,0 +10 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

gg5, prog

-> singular form

@@ -12,2 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>signatory countries</gloss>
-<gloss>members of a treaty</gloss>
+<gloss>signatory (country)</gloss>
+<gloss>party (to a treaty)</gloss>

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2835108">オオツチグモ</xref>

GG5, JWN

@@ -9 +9,5 @@
-<gloss>tarantula</gloss>
+<gloss>tarantula (common name for large spiders)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>European wolf spider (Lycosa tarentula)</gloss>

Should have been dropped in the previous edit.

@@ -16,4 +15,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>おおざか</reb>
-<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>
-</r_ele>
@@ -21 +16,0 @@
-<stagr>おおさか</stagr>

why is there おおざか reading if it doesn't apply to any senses?

Sure.

@@ -24,5 +23,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<misc>&arch;</misc>
-<gloss>large hill</gloss>

daijr: もと「大坂」と書いたが，1871年（明治4）大阪府は「坂」を「阪」に改めた
       中世・近世では「おおざか」が普通だった

"large hill" is a direct translation of the characters but I'm not seeing a "large hill" sense in any of the refs. Can we drop it?

@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>
@@ -16,0 +18 @@
+<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>

@@ -21 +21 @@
-<gloss>Osaka (city)</gloss>
+<gloss>Osaka (city, prefecture)</gloss>

@@ -24 +24 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&num;</pos>

My IME suggested this for the いちまん input
nikk
長距離競走
〘名〙 陸上競技で、三〇〇〇メートル以上の距離の競走のこと。普通行なわれているのは、三〇〇〇メートル、五〇〇〇メートル、一〇〇〇〇メートルの三種目だが

@@ -15,0 +16,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>一〇〇〇〇</keb>
+</k_ele>

I can live with it.

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/10000

OK?

@@ -3,0 +4,4 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>１万</keb>
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
+</k_ele>
@@ -9 +13,2 @@
-<keb>１万</keb>
+<keb>１００００</keb>
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>

I don't know (don't track them.)
I see that searching for Bukkōji works in both wwwjdic and jisho.org, but Bukkoji fails in jisho.org and works in wwwjdic due to a partial match.
We have just on 900 entries with ō in the glosses.

@@ -15 +14,0 @@
-<gloss>Kōbe</gloss>

I don't think it's needed. How often are macrons used in lookups?

We have 7 entries with 神戸 and as usual in JMdict we don't use macrons. I'm about to run a big Kou->Kō conversion in JMnedict, and it might be an idea to have a version with the macron searchable here.

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<gloss>Kōbe</gloss>

aligning with other city entries

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<gloss>Kobe (port city near Osaka)</gloss>
+<gloss>Kobe (city)</gloss>

G n-grams 15867166

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -8,0 +10 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

Entry created

G n-grams 14717809

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -8,0 +10 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

Entry created

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<gloss>Sapporo (city in Hokkaidoa)</gloss>
+<gloss>Sapporo (city in Hokkaido)</gloss>

aligning

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<gloss>Sapporo (city)</gloss>
+<gloss>Sapporo (city in Hokkaidoa)</gloss>

G n-grams 10970260

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -8,0 +10 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

http://www.edrdg.org/wiki/index.php/Editorial_policy#Proper_Names

Sapporo is fine - it's both a prefectural capital and a "Designated City".

Just wondering whether names are supposed to be allowed to remain in EDICT?

daijr/s

Also a 形容動詞.
Aligning with びしょ濡れ.
I don't think the x-ref is necessary.

@@ -10,0 +11,2 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
@@ -12,2 +13,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="1612930">びしょ濡れ</xref>
@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<gloss>dripping wet</gloss>
@@ -16 +17,2 @@
-<gloss>wet to the skin</gloss>
+<gloss>drenched</gloss>
+<gloss>soaked</gloss>

Entry created

日本大百科 (オオツチグモ): "同科のおもな種類には、トリクイグモAvicularia aviculariaがあり、南アメリカに分布している。体長5センチ内外で、鳥類を食べるというので古来この名があり、別にトリトリグモともよばれてきた。"

Not seeing it in the kokugos but 日本大百科's オオツチグモ entry gives トリクイグモ and トリトリグモ as Japanese names for that species.

鳥食蜘蛛	No matches
鳥食い蜘蛛	No matches <- in GG5
とりくいぐも	No matches

GG5 has "a bird spider; Avicularia avicularia." for this. I'm suggesting it as another sense, but GG5 is a bit error-prone in these names.

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>鳥食い蜘蛛</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -19,0 +23,6 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<misc>&obsc;</misc>
+<gloss>bird spider (Avicularia avicularia)</gloss>

Daijs now redirects to オオツチグモ.

@@ -16,2 +16 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2003260">タランチュラ</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2003260">タランチュラ・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2835108">オオツチグモ</xref>

Entry created

Daijs now redirects to オオツチグモ.

@@ -16,2 +16 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2003260">タランチュラ</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2003260">タランチュラ・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2835108">オオツチグモ</xref>

Entry created

gg5

@@ -15 +15,2 @@
-<gloss>on the whole</gloss>
+<gloss>general</gloss>
+<gloss>as a whole</gloss>

G n-grams 3732211

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -8,0 +10 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

GG5

nikk, jwn, life, eij

刺し違える	4802
さしちがえる	54
刺しちがえる	214
刺違える	60

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>刺しちがえる</keb>

daij, gg5

Splitting from 1593770.